|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARML23216A0362023-08-0707 August 2023 Notification of an NRC Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and RFI RS-23-077, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-16016 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23079A2262023-03-20020 March 2023 Form 5.1-1 Post-Examination Check Sheet (Quad Cities, 2023) IR 05000254/20233012023-03-0707 March 2023 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000254/2023301; 05000265/2023301 ML23079A2222023-02-21021 February 2023 Form 2.1-1 Examination Preparation Checklist ML23079A2192023-02-21021 February 2023 Form 1.3-1 Exam Security Agreement SVP-23-007, Licensee Post-Exam Submittal Letter (SVP-23-007, Quad Cities, 2023)2023-02-0909 February 2023 Licensee Post-Exam Submittal Letter (SVP-23-007, Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2282023-02-0808 February 2023 Post-Exam Review Comments (None) ML23020A4132023-01-23023 January 2023 Operator License Examination Approval - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, January 2023 ML23079A2072023-01-13013 January 2023 Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2042023-01-13013 January 2023 Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2032022-11-11011 November 2022 Licensee Proposed Exam Cover Letter (SVP-22-065, Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A0842022-10-17017 October 2022 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A0432022-10-17017 October 2022 Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023).pdf ML23079A0272022-10-0505 October 2022 Licensee Outline Submittal Email (Quad Cities, 2023) ML22188A1752022-07-11011 July 2022 Confirmation of Initial License Examination RS-22-045, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-25025 March 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21281A1242021-10-0808 October 2021 GFE Results, September 2021 IR 05000254/20213012021-08-23023 August 2021 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000254/2021301; 05000265/2021301 ML22192A2062021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile Outline Submittal Comments ML22192A2052021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet-Final ML22192A2032021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-7 Operating Test Review Worksheet-Final ML22192A1922021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-201-1 ML22192A1932021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-201-3 Security Agreement-Final ML22192A1952021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-403-1 Written Exam Quality Checklist ML22192A2042021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-4 Rejected KAs ML22192A1962021-06-22022 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Post-Exam Submittal Letter-06-22-2021 ML22193A2862021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO Written Exam-Final ML22193A2872021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO List of Reference Handouts-Final ML22193A0932021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO Admin JPMs-Final ML22193A1072021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered Simulator Scenarios-Final ML22193A1052021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered Simulator and Inplant JPMs-Final ML21152A1022021-06-0202 June 2021 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML22193A3112021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Simulator Scenarios ML22193A3102021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Simulator and Inplant JPMs ML22193A3012021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist ML22193A3082021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML22193A3002021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist ML22193A3032021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-6 Written Exam Quality Checklist ML22193A2992021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-3 Operating Test Quality Checklist ML22193A3122021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Written Exam-RO and SRO ML22193A3222021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-D-1 Scenario Outlines ML22193A3202021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-301-2 RO and SRO Sim-Inplant Systems Outlines ML22193A3142021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist ML22193A3192021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-301-1 RO and SRO Admin Topics Outlines 2023-08-07
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARML23216A0362023-08-0707 August 2023 Notification of an NRC Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and RFI RS-23-077, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-16016 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23079A2262023-03-20020 March 2023 Form 5.1-1 Post-Examination Check Sheet (Quad Cities, 2023) IR 05000254/20233012023-03-0707 March 2023 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000254/2023301; 05000265/2023301 ML23079A2192023-02-21021 February 2023 Form 1.3-1 Exam Security Agreement ML23079A2222023-02-21021 February 2023 Form 2.1-1 Examination Preparation Checklist SVP-23-007, Licensee Post-Exam Submittal Letter (SVP-23-007, Quad Cities, 2023)2023-02-0909 February 2023 Licensee Post-Exam Submittal Letter (SVP-23-007, Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2282023-02-0808 February 2023 Post-Exam Review Comments (None) ML23020A4132023-01-23023 January 2023 Operator License Examination Approval - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, January 2023 ML23079A2072023-01-13013 January 2023 Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2042023-01-13013 January 2023 Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A2032022-11-11011 November 2022 Licensee Proposed Exam Cover Letter (SVP-22-065, Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A0842022-10-17017 October 2022 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023) ML23079A0432022-10-17017 October 2022 Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist (Quad Cities, 2023).pdf ML23079A0272022-10-0505 October 2022 Licensee Outline Submittal Email (Quad Cities, 2023) ML22188A1752022-07-11011 July 2022 Confirmation of Initial License Examination RS-22-045, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-25025 March 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations IR 05000254/20213012021-08-23023 August 2021 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000254/2021301; 05000265/2021301 ML22192A1952021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-403-1 Written Exam Quality Checklist ML22192A2032021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-7 Operating Test Review Worksheet-Final ML22192A1932021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-201-3 Security Agreement-Final ML22192A2052021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet-Final ML22192A2062021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile Outline Submittal Comments ML22192A2042021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-4 Rejected KAs ML22192A1922021-07-0909 July 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-201-1 ML22192A1962021-06-22022 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Post-Exam Submittal Letter-06-22-2021 ML22193A1052021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered Simulator and Inplant JPMs-Final ML22193A2862021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO Written Exam-Final ML22193A2872021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO List of Reference Handouts-Final ML22193A0932021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered RO and SRO Admin JPMs-Final ML22193A1072021-06-14014 June 2021 2021 QC Ile Administered Simulator Scenarios-Final ML21152A1022021-06-0202 June 2021 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML22193A2992021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-3 Operating Test Quality Checklist ML22193A3082021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML22193A3032021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-401-6 Written Exam Quality Checklist ML22193A3102021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Simulator and Inplant JPMs ML22193A3122021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Written Exam-RO and SRO ML22193A3002021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist ML22193A3012021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist ML22193A3112021-05-0505 May 2021 2021 QC Ile Proposed Simulator Scenarios ML22193A3202021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-301-2 RO and SRO Sim-Inplant Systems Outlines ML22193A3142021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist ML22193A3162021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklists ML22193A3192021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-301-1 RO and SRO Admin Topics Outlines ML22193A3222021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-D-1 Scenario Outlines ML22193A3212021-04-0707 April 2021 2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-401-1 and ES-401-3 2023-08-07
[Table view] |
Text
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 1 F 2 Y N S 2 H 3 Y M S Will EDG load a bus after an OC condition? Load shedding occur?
RE: Yes, bus is deenergized and picked up by EDG.
3 H 3 Y M S 4 F 1 X N N U OP Bkrs open after 30 seconds? Closed not a creditable distractor with question as is? K/A is ability question not a knowledge question. Question too easy. RE: Changed second bullet to when breaker opens ..
5 H 2 N S 6 H 3 Y N S 7 H 2 Y N S 8 H@ 2 Y B S 9 H 2 Y B S 10 F 2 Y M S 11 H 3 Y M S Licensee provided TS Bases as reference to RO question, RE:
Licensee has included same information in lesson plans for ROs.
TS Bases provided to NRC review for information only. Ref to TS basis (and TS basis) removed.
12 F@ 2 Y N S 13 F 2 Y B S 14 F 3 Y B S 15 F 3 Y B S K/A asks for effect to NPSH not vortexing! RE: Same symptoms but different causes. RE: Keep question as is!
16 H@ 3 Y B S 17 F 3 Y B S 18 F 3 Y N S 1
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 19 H 2 Y B S 20 H@ 2 N M S K/A requires using EOPS in conjunction with AOPs. AOPs not included in stem or distractors. RE: Actions in distractors are from AOPs. Will keep question as is.
21 H 3 Y N S Is this information that would be know by an RO. RE: Yes 22 H@ 2 Y N S 23 F 3 Y N S 24 H 2 Y B S 25 H@ 3 Y M S 26 F 2 Y N S 27 F 3 Y B S 28 H 3 Y B S 29 H@ 2 X Y M E Per the explanation, distractor C is correct, not distractor A as indicated. Why is B not correct? RE: Information provided to support correct answer is in error. Will change justification for correct answer. Since Q & A were correct, changed this from U to E
30 H 3 Y N S 31 H 2 Y B S 32 H@ 2 Y B S 33 F 2 Y M S Why is A incorrect. Chief believed that rods would indicate 00 post-scram? RE: If ind. Rod scram sw. held in position, rod would indicate on full core display, not 00 34 H 2 Y M S 35 F 2 Y M S 36 H@ 2 Y B S 37 H 3 Y M S 2
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 38 F 2 Y B S 39 F 2 Y B S 40 H 2 Y B S 41 F@ 3 Y B S 42 H 2 Y M S 43 H 2 Y N S 44 F 2 Y N S 45 F@ 3 Y B S 46 H 3 Y M S 47 H 3 Y N S 48 F@ 2 Y B E Remove is after DG. RE: Comment incorporated.
49 H 3 Y M S 50 F 2 Y M S Need procedural guidance for 11 oclock position. RE: provided in QCOP 6600-02, step F.2.j!
51 F 2 Y M S 52 F 2 Y M S Is 1B SWP normally selected for standby? RE: Yes, its the only SWP with an auto start feature.
53 F@ 2 Y B S 54 F@ 2 Y B S 55 H 4 Y B S What value, Blocks to Full on RWM? K/A ask effect of loss of malfunction of RWM. RE: Malfunction is in DFWLC which inputs to RWM. Blocks to Full disabled = doesnt enforce rod blocks above 10% pwr.
56 H@ 2 Y B S 57 H@ 2 Y B S 3
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 58 F 2 Y B S 59 F 2 Y B S 60 H@ 2 Y N S 61 H 2 Y N S 62 H 2 Y M S 63 F@ 3 Y B S 64 H 2 Y N S 65 F 2 Y B S 66 F 2 Y M S 67 F@ 2 Y B S 68 H 2 Y M S 69 F 3 Y B S 70 F 2 Y M S 71 F@ 2 Y N S 72 F 2 Y N S 73 F 2 Y B S 74 H 3 Y M S 75 F@ 2 Y B E Switch B and A distractors so that they are in order from least significant to most significant! RE: Comment incorporated.
1 H 3 Y Y N S Per QCOA 0202-04, D.2 actions to insert CRAM rods appears to be correct action! Why is distractor A incorrect? RE: Insert ALL CRAM rods is in correct! Only insert enough to get out of Region II.
4
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 2 H 3 Y Y N S 3 M 4 Y Y N S 4 H 2 Y Y N S 5 H@ 2 Y Y N S 6 H 2 Y Y N S 7 H 3 Y Y N S 8 H 2 Y Y M S 9 H@ 2 Y Y N S 10 H 3 Y Y N S K/A asks for H concentrations and H monitoring availability. RE:
Providing H concentration provides no additional information to question. Stem already has SRO in QGA 200-5, Hydrogen Control.
11 H 3 Y Y N S 12 F@ 3 Y Y N S If RCIC flow controller placed in Manual at 400 gpm, would that still render RCIC inoperable? D distractor, would RCIC eventually need to be declared inoperable for this condition? RE: Yes, RCIC is still inoperable. Yes, RCIC eventually would be declared inop.
Stem asks for IMMEDIATE actions!
13 H 3 N Y N S K/A A2 requires predicting impact and procedure to correct. TS is used as procedure but no predicting of impact in answer. RE: In order to deduce the correct TS, applicant would need to know what impact was.
14 H 3 N Y N U K/A A2 requires predicting impact AND procedure to correct control or mitigate. Missing procedure reference. RE: Procedure references were pulled out to make the question look neater.
Reference procedures put back in distractors.
15 H@ 3 Y Y N S 16 H 2 Y Y N S 17 H 2 Y Y M S 18 H@ 2 Y Y N S 5
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 19 H 2 Y Y M S 20 F 3 Y Y B S 21 F@ 2 Y Y B E Remove temporary from stem since answer contains temporary.
RE: Will replace with portable.
22 F 2 Y Y M S 23 F 2 Y Y B S 24 F 2 Y Y N S 25 H@ 3 X Y Y B U Last bullet in stem states, .. ready to provide SAMG decision making. Correct distractor includes entering into SAMGs. Clue in stem (SAMG) needs to be deleted. RE: moved bullet from stem to distractor A.
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
- 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
- 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
- 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
- The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
- The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
- The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
- The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
- One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
- 4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
- The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
- The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
- The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
- The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
- 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
- 6. Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section D.2.f.
- 7. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 8. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
6
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
@ - Denotes 30 initial review questions that verified references, K/A conformance, level of difficulty and level of knowledge.
RKWalton 10/20/2009 7