ML100350192
| ML100350192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/2010 |
| From: | Burmeister B Entergy Operations |
| To: | Wang A Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| Wang, A B, NRR/DORL/LPLIV, 415-1445 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME2817 | |
| Download: ML100350192 (1) | |
Text
From:
BURMEISTER, BARRY M [BBURMEI@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:55 PM To:
Wang, Alan Cc:
CHATTERTON, WALTER G
Subject:
FW: Little question for River Bend guys on ME2817 - Request for Alternative RBS-ISI-015 Importance:
High From: CHATTERTON, WALTER G As discussed on our telephone conference with the NRC this morning, all nozzle-to-shell welds that are included in our Request for Relief RBS-ISI-015 had no indications with the following exceptions:
B13-D001-N05B-1: Three (3) relevant indications were recorded that were acceptable to the requirements of IWB-3000, and no further evaluations were required. Indications have no determinable through wall. Previous (inspection) data was reviewed with no significant changes noted. 93% code coverage was acheived.
B13-D001-N06c-1: One (1) relevant indication was recorded that was acceptable to the requirements of IWB-3000, and no further evaluations were required. Indication has no determinable through wall.
Previous (inspection) data was reviewed with no significant changes noted. 92.7% code coverage was acheived.
From: Wang, Alan [1]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:03 PM To: BURMEISTER, BARRY M
Subject:
FW: Little question for River Bend guys on ME2817 - Request for Alternative RBS-ISI-015 Barry, from the reviewer. He is going on rotation next week for 3 months so he would like resolve before he leaves.
I was wondering if we could discuss, or get a quick informal answer to a question I had concerning ME2817. Namely, the applicants commented that they had previously inspected certain vessel nozzles twice, but did not mention if they found anything. This is pertinent to my review and whether I will need to issue an RAI or not.
Either a call, or an email reply would be satisfactory (presuming they did not find any indications of note). If notable indications were found, I would suggest that they voluntarily supplement their application to document these in relation to the ME2817 RBS-ISI-015 application.
Alan E-mail Properties
Mail Envelope Properties (CD4D1C0F74BA5D4694C454B66FE5945607346759)
Subject:
FW: Little question for River Bend guys on ME2817 - Request for Alternative RBS-ISI-015 Sent Date: 2/3/2010 5:54:37 PM Received Date: 2/3/2010 5:54:37 PM From: BURMEISTER, BARRY M Created By: BBURMEI@entergy.com Recipients:
Alan.Wang@nrc.gov (Wang, Alan)
Tracking Status: None wchatte@entergy.com (CHATTERTON, WALTER G)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
CCTEXETSP006.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 10665 2/3/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceHigh ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: