ML093340461

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Written Retake Exam Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML093340461
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/2009
From:
NextEra Energy Seabrook
To: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML092330362 List:
References
TAC U01798
Download: ML093340461 (5)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: .5'~rook CW('~~~ Date of Examination: loiLlo_CJ Developed by: Written - Facility -g[ NRC 0 /I OperaifR~ - Facility EJ I-:lRe 8 N Pr Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) ..... 'O~"j lf~

. .~ {} J.y 5

-120. 2. NRC examiners and facility contact aSSigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

~r-

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) -rF

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) "'j()

iF

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C. i.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] N~

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, I ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's; ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) iF I

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} lP'

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

Tf Tf-

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) If

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) . If

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) -r~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) [P (P

-7 13. Written examinations ac.d g~eFatiAEI te~ approved by NRC supervisor (Co2.i; C.3.h) T~

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2';: Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) l\

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) rF

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3,i) IJ~

.. Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date case-by identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee,

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201. Page 24 of 27

Seabrook Station 2009 NRC Remediation Written Exam ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Seabrook Date of Examination: 10/1/09 Initials Item Task Description a b* C#

[,l-

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

f> 1f

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KiA categories are appropriately sampled. F(.. \tJ) tf
c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. T'I- \fi) -rf
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KiA statements are appropriate. Tt v ('!t-, --~

sing Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of no olutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transl

b. Assess whether there are enoug '0 sets (and spares e projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the ew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, a~ that e licant can be tested using at least one new or significa Ified scenario, that no scenario u licated from the applican ' estes), and that scenarios will not be repeated on s extent pOSSible, assess whether the outline(s) confonn(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

W 1 (2)

T (3)

(4)

(5) b.

etermine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N

c. Ensure that KiA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A l e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column *c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ATTACHMENT 3 Form ES-210-3, Examination Security Agreement E5-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I ac1<;nowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s}

of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly cli¥ulge any information about Ihese examinations to any persolls who have l}y the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct evaluate. Of provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of exam ina inalion lion administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator Of communicator is acceptable if the indiVidual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect fee<lback) Furltlennore, I am aware of the physical security measures and reqUirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of tihis 3:;1reement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facilit)' management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestiOns thaI eKamination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing eKaminallons administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into tihis security l¥,Ifeement until the completion of examination adminislration, I did nol instruct, evaluale, or feed/Jack to those applicants who were administered l.hase licensing examinations. except as specifically noled below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TlTLE.I RESPONSIB1L1TY -----siGNATURE (1) eo GII.NII til""'" 151 "'"1'W.TE NOTE

3.

4.

4#-1

-llf1 'llJ7

,6. .-

- Mvh -~c:.. < --.!.IJ.)

~a

7. y~- t!tl1t" t? /
8. Y ~ - Y11 1ft (. I f.4!l-:.

-~ffl/lf:' fl.

12'~~= ~.vC%fi>> ______ ~

12~'~~~~~~~ __~~~~____________ ~

~~:;; =*~k" = -~':V/ 7':;YJ.:)ft'~ r~~'

B,--'71'~~~(,.I..I~~~ --:-:-=~~ ~

14 ....r.::::,~:!LJ>~.L---J,..e+"'-'-':...:: "-'I----:~~-------.::c6~=-'~----

~ ,~ I,' _ ._ .*

zc A

""-"J.

ES-201, 21 of 28 Page 8 8

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: S"',~ ,h5 rwO rwO/L /L Date of Exam: /0 II /oq Exam Level: RO ~1 SRO [2' !

Initial Item Description a b' c*

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. teL .~ 1f iU...- ~? r"(~
2. a. NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions,
b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. iU... f"(~

I 3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 rc.L [;/ "\,

"\,-

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

TLC ~it'

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or ~) 1(-'

_ the examinations were developed independenlly; or )~L-

_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or

_ other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent ~ Bank Modified Mod;',d New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest [t,L- 1)) -C~

[t,L new or modified); enter the actual RO I/ SRO-only question distribution( s) at right.

~r/~8'

~r/ i/o 1)0

/)0 Ib //()..

lId..

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA F.-I F.-I- 1.7; i~

exam are written at the comprehensionl analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right.

77.'+/ >~ (,). ~ /~ 4 4-

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers p.-L ~) K~ ,~

or aid in the elimination of distractors,

9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; ILL- $7 ~,

deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. fLL ~ li~ i~
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

i{'L. -'1J)'

"'(~

a.

b.

c, d.

Author Facility Reviewer (0)

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NRC Regional Supervisor y.,.,;AI AIerN erN

,lJf}'t)

,-n IN\

Printed Name I

'J 1v1-1(}tJf-V C.

f ;5JZ..~'

51Z..~' LJ..rtF R f(H I ~ {171 r{

U J-I.c.

Sign~~.

Sign~~_

CMSIOL-J J-I.4 ...... s~/t /-y-j

./

~../JK

...<"../

r{, ,..::t: ~

/ --sr ~ ... ~Cr11

~

JK v

~.-

1\

Il Date

~is":/.

""l r!t Note: o The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial ilems in Column 'c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : Exam Level: R~SROI Initials Item Oescri tion a b c

1. Tf
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Date
a. Grader 10/1 )oe,
b. Facility Reviewer(*) .-. lAo /O)f

/ O)f )01

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) oIJ/ar m(¢/ar
d. NRC Supervisor (*) /o/C,/o9

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML093340461&oldid=2560715"