ML093200484
| ML093200484 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/11/2009 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML093200484 (6) | |
Text
1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
STROUD, MICHAEL D [MSTROUD@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:00 AM To:
Green, Kimberly
Subject:
Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc Attachments:
Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc
- Kim, See one comment on the November 3, 2009 telecon summary.
Thanks Mike
<<Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc>>
Hearing Identifier:
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
1862 Mail Envelope Properties (A79A58994C541C48BBCFB319610763CB0610A7F0)
Subject:
Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc Sent Date:
11/11/2009 11:00:02 AM Received Date:
11/11/2009 11:00:07 AM From:
STROUD, MICHAEL D Created By:
MSTROUD@entergy.com Recipients:
"Green, Kimberly" <Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
LITEXETSP002.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 142 11/11/2009 11:00:07 AM Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc 58944 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
DATE, 2009 LICENSEE:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2009, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING METEOROLOGICAL DATA USED FOR THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSES Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant) held a telephone call on November 3, 2009, to obtain clarification on how the meteorological data that were used in the severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMA) analysis were averaged. As stated in the Environmental Report five recent years of data were averaged and used as input for the MACCS2 analysis; however, the applicant did not describe how the averaging of the data was conducted.
During the call, the staff asked Entergy to describe how it averaged the data, and to verify the data for wind direction. Entergy stated that it averaged five years worth of meteorological data.
For each year, there are 8,760 data points. The applicant stated that it averaged each corresponding data point (i.e., same data point for each year) for all five years. It clarified that it averaged each parameter separately, i.e., wind speed, direction, precipitation, and humidity.
The applicant stated that it will confirm with its contractor how the data were averaged, and indicated that another phone call might be needed.
The enclosure provides a listing of the participants.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Kimberly Green, Safety Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: See next page Field Cod
DATE, 2009 LICENSEE:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY:
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CALL HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2009, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING METEOROLOGICAL DATA USED FOR THE SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ANALYSES Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant) held a telephone call on November 3, 2009, to obtain clarification on how the meteorological data that were used in the severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMA) were averaged. As stated in the Environmental Report five recent years of data were averaged and used as input for the MACCS2 analysis; however, the applicant did not describe how the averaging of the data was conducted.
During the call, the staff asked Entergy to describe how it averaged the data, and to verify the data for wind direction. Entergy stated that it averaged five years worth of meteorological data.
For each year, there are 8,760 data points. The applicant stated that it averaged each corresponding data point (i.e., same data point for each year) for all five years. It clarified that it averaged each parameter separately, i.e., wind speed, direction, precipitation, and humidity.
The applicant stated that it will confirm with its contractor how the data were averaged, and indicated that another phone call might be needed.
The enclosure provides a listing of the participants.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Kimberly Green, Safety Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS Accession Number: G:\\ADRO\\DLR\\RPB2\\Indian Point\\Safety Review\\Telecon Summaries\\Telecon Summary 11-03-09 MACCS2 Met Data.doc OFFICE PM:RPB2:DLR LA:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME DATE 11/DD/09 11/DD/09 11/DD/09 11/DD/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Field Cod
ENCLOSURE TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NOVEMBER 3, 2009 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Kim Green U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Bob Palla NRC Nate Bixler Sandia National Laboratory (SNL)
Joe Jones SNL Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Clem Yeh Entergy Kou John Hong Entergy Doug Gaynor Entergy