ML090640374

Comment (14) E-mail Regarding Iplr Dseis

ML090640374
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	02/27/2009
From:	Public Commenter Public Commenter
To:	Division of License Renewal
NRC/NRR/DLR
References
73FR80440
Download: ML090640374 (2)

Text

IPRenewalCEmails From: PATRICIA CHERNOFF [patriciachernoff@verizon.net]

Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:35 PM To: IndianPointEIS Resource I oppose the relicensing of Indian Point because I fear the maintaining of such an aging facility endangers the lives of the millions of residents in the area including those living in New York City.

We know that Indian Point because of its age is beyond the point where it can be insured for safety. And we know that Indian Point was unwisely build on a fault which makes it a greater risk in terms of its stability. Entergy has irresponsibly taken it on for what profit they can make from it. Much work has been done by our government representatives to oppose the licensing of Indian Point, yet this struggle goes on. Why? Do we not see the wisdom in insuring the health and safety of the residents of New York by closing this facility down?

I personally have worked to close down Indian Point for 30 years! the accident at Three Mile Island showed us many years ago the folly of building nuclear facilites near heavily populated areas but we seem unable to learn from this and other past errors.

Patricia A. Chernoff 771 West End Ave. #10K New York,NY 10025-5539 1

Federal Register Notice: 73FR80440 Comment Number: 14 Mail Envelope Properties (F7D96A4BA97D4F35808521172956C3A7)

Subject:

Sent Date: 2/27/2009 2:34:49 PM Received Date: 2/27/2009 2:35:00 PM From: PATRICIA CHERNOFF Created By: patriciachernoff@verizon.net Recipients:

"IndianPointEIS Resource" <IndianPoint.EIS@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: PC271361796384 Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1078 2/27/2009 2:35:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: