ML090410147

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
EN-WM-102, Rev. 2; Work Implementation and Closeout
ML090410147
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/2008
From:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
NRC Region 1
John Richmond
References
EN-WM-102, Rev 2
Download: ML090410147 (25)


Text

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 1 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout Procedure Contains NMM REFLIB Forms: YES NO Effective Date 03/27/2008 Procedure Owner:

Title:

Site:

Dennis Legere Director, Outage and Work Management Executive Sponsor:

Title:

Site:

Joseph P. DeRoy VP, Ops Support Echelon Exception Date*

Site Site Procedure Champion Title ANO James Hoffpauir Manager, P&SO N/A BRP N/A N/A GGNS Matthew Rohrer Manager, P&SO IPEC Paul Studley Manager, P&SO JAF Dave Wallace Manager, P&SO PNPS Marty Richey Manager, P&SO PLP Arnold Owens Manager, P&SO RBS Brent Matherne Manager, P&SO VY Chris Wamser Manager, P&SO W3 Gregory Fey Manager, P&SO N/A NP N/A N/A N/A HQN N/A N/A Site and NMM Procedures Canceled or Superseded By This Revision EN-WM-102 Rev 1 Process Applicability Exclusion: All Sites:

Specific Sites: ANO BRP GGNS IPEC JAF PLP PNPS RBS VY W3 Change Statement This revision changes the timeframe to print work packages from T-1 to T-2, specifies the need for timely work closure within IAS (pg. 19) and addresses clarifications resulting from the Work Management Academy. This revision allows the Work Group Supervisor and Surveillance Coordinator to delegate taking Work Orders to Complete status by changing their responsibility from performance to ensure. Minor editorial changes have also been incorporated into this revision.

  • Requires justification for the exception

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 2 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE................................................................................ 3

2.0 REFERENCES

......................................................................... 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS........................................................................... 4 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES................................................................. 5 5.0 DETAILS.................................................................................. 7 6.0 INTERFACES......................................................................... 23 7.0 RECORDS............................................................................. 23 8.0 OBLIGATION AND REGULATORY COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCES.......................................................... 23 9.0 ATTACHMENTS.................................................................... 23 ATTACHMENT 9.1 STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABLE QA RECORDS IN WORK PACKAGES...24 ATTACHMENT 9.2 WORK PACKAGE QA RECORDS..25

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 3 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to provide instructions for complying with plant programs and procedures that control task performance in addition to, or in conjunction with work-specific procedures. Additionally, this procedure provides flow charts for work implementation, and close out.

2.0 REFERENCES

[1]

Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual

[2]

EN-AD-101 Procedure Process

[3]

EN-AD-103 Document Control and Records Management Activities

[4]

EN-HU-101 Human Performance Program

[5]

EN-HU-102 Human Performance Tools

[6]

EN-MA-105 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment

[7]

EN-MA-119 Material Handling Program

[8]

EN-MA-125 General Troubleshooting

[9]

EN-OP-102 Protective and Caution Tagging Process

[10]

EN-LI-102 Corrective Action Process

[11]

EN-WM-100 Work Order Generation, Screening and Classification

[12]

EN-WM-101 On-Line Work Management Process

[13]

EN-WM-105 Planning Procedure

[14]

MA-104, Qualifications of Maintenance Personnel

[15]

EN-MA-101 Conduct of Maintenance

[16]

ENS-MP-115 Material Issues and Returns

[17]

ENN-MP-116 Material Receiving and Returns

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 4 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 3.0 DEFINITIONS Indus Asset Suite (IAS) - The Software product used by the Entergy Fleet for Work Management, Engineering Change, Materials Purchasing and Contracts and for the creation of new controlled documents and revisions to controlled documents (controlled document information populates Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)via an interface).

Releasing Organization - Operations Department is responsible for authorizing performance of the work. An Operations Representative will have defined the Control Room Communications requirement on all Work Orders that are on the schedule, and thus authorized work to progress on schedule under these constraints on the Work Order.

Scope - The work boundaries established for a specific task or activity as identified in the Work Package.

Scope Change - Any work/activity that is not addressed in the original Work Package.

Scope change may be discovered during package walkdown or during actual work.

Team Leader - Any member of the plant staff, employee or contractor, qualified by training and experience to provide direction and oversight to several team members. Examples would be Step-Up Supervisors, Lead Workers, Working Foremen, etc.

Team Member - Any member of the plant staff, employee or contractor, qualified by training and experience to perform one or more maintenance activities.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 5 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

[1] The Director PS&O is responsible for maintenance of this procedure.

[2] The Implementing Work Group Manager is responsible for providing direction and oversight to ensure their personnel are in compliance with the requirements of this procedure.

[3] The Shift Manager is responsible for direction and oversight pertaining to releasing work on plant components.

[4] The OPS Work Control center is responsible for:

x Determining the required level of Control Room communication and documenting this information in the Task Nuclear Details (IAS).

x Determining if Operations review of a work order task is required after field work is completed and documenting the requirement in Task Nuclear Details (IAS).

[5] Implementing Work Group Supervisors / Team Leaders are responsible for:

x Coordinating and controlling work activities in accordance with EN-MA-101 Conduct of Maintenance.

x Assignment of qualified personnel to conduct activities based on documented training and qualification records.

x Ensuring pre-job briefings are performed commensurate with the complexity of the job and skill level of personnel involved in the brief.

x Ensuring permits effective dates are valid for the period when the work will be performed.

x Review and concurrence of work performed documentation.

x Ensure completion of non-surveillance Work Orders in (IAS) and routing completed Work Package documentation to Electronic Documents Management System.

x Ensuring Handoffs to other disciplines are completed in a timely manner for all Work activities that contain multi-discipline tasks.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 6 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 4.0 cont.

[6] The Surveillance Coordinator ensures completion of work orders associated with surveillance tasks in (IAS) to ensure the task is credited on the appropriate date.

[7] The Implementing Work Group Coordinator is responsible for appraising the Work Week Manager of the status of scheduled work activities and work not performed per the schedule.

[8] The Implementing Work Group Supt. Is responsible for ensuring work orders that have all WO tasks in a finished status are set to complete within 30 days.

Note: The fleet standard WEB based Work Order Report Tk Finish-WO not Close identifies work orders where all WO tasks are in a FINISHED status, but the work order is not in a COMPLETE status.

[9] Craft Personnel / Team members are responsible for:

x Identification of and compliance with the required level of Control Room Communication indicated on the work order package prior to commencing field work.

x Documenting work performed and setting the work order task to H/OPS or Finished status in (IAS) upon completion of field work.

x Providing Work Order Feedback via Action Tracking

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 7 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 5.0 DETAILS 5.1 PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS None 5.2 WORK CONTROL PROCESS The Work Control process is shown in the following high level flow chart. Details of the Identify are contained in EN-WM-100, Work Order Generation, Screening and Classification; Plan details are contained in EN-WM-105, Planning; and Schedule details are contained in EN-WM-101, On-Line Work Management Process.

START IDENTIFY PLAN SCHEDULE PERFORM TEST CLOSEOUT STOP 5.3 PERFORM WORK AND TEST This section contains flow charts pertaining to the Plan, Perform and Test segments of the process. The steps in each flow chart are explained on the pages after the chart.

Activities are represented by logic symbols in the first column of the two-column table.

The adjacent column contains a narrative description.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 8 OF 25 Work Implementation and Closeout 5.3 cont.

WR Screened as Toolpouch And Opened As Minor Maintenance Scheduled &

Planned WO Package Print Work Request As Desired Implementing Dept Update IAS As Necessary Perform Work Package Acceptance?

Implementing Dept.

Yes Print Information Copy Of WO Package Implementing Department Set WO Task To WORKING In IAS If Required, Return WO To Planning Implementing Department Perform Walkdown Implementing Department Print Control Copy Of WO Package During T-2 Week Planning As Needed, Obtain Materials As Needed, Obtain Tools Identify And Comply With Operations Communication Requirements Implementing Departments Implementing Departments Implementing Departments A

B A

Operations Communication Complete?

Implementing Dept.

Yes No B

Perform Work Implementing Department C

Scope Change Needed?

Perform Maintenance Tests No Perform Operability Tests Implementing Depts.

Implementing Departments Operations C

To Close Out Flow Chart Yes No Package Walkdown?

Implementing Dept.

Yes No WO Package Replanned/

Rescheduled As Needed Implementing Dept Implementing Dept Progress Work Status Implementing Department

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 9 OF 25 5.3 cont.

x When the Work Screening Committee screens a WR as Tool-pouch Maintenance Then the implementing organization o Makes any required notifications (control room, work management center, RP etc.)

o Performs the work (the WR may be printed or not) o When work is finished, then completion comments are entered into the Work Request the Minor Maintenance Work Request is advanced to a status of Completed o Permanent Record documentation is not required.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 10 OF 25 5.3 cont.

Friday of T-9, scheduled packages are planned and ready for implementing department acceptance.

Corrective and Elective compliance packages are routed in (IAS) by Planning to Maintenance for package acceptance. Package acceptance is documented by Maintenance in (IAS) by approving the routed item. Package acceptance should be based on the following:

x work instructions review for accurate technical content is performed by a qualified individual x ability to implement work instructions as written x support requirements enabling implementation o scaffolding o engineering o operations o environmental considerations (heat, cooling, lighting, etc.)

x protective tagging request submitted /

identified x permits required for implementation identified (examples, not all-inclusive) o confined space o hot work o fire impairment o job safety hazard analysis o transient fire load o excavation o chemical use x materials o materials listed or reserved are correct and special requirements are identified

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 11 OF 25 5.3 cont.

x Any unique or one-of-a-kind tools or M&TE listed on the Tools panel in (IAS) will be available and in calibration on the scheduled date. The fleet standard WEB based Work Order Report WO EQ/MTE Reservation by Date identifies unique tools and MTE that have been reserved.

x procedure(s) reference / drawings are relevant and accurate for work to be performed x control room / work management center communication / notification requirements are understood / clear x handoffs to other departments / division of responsibility is clear and delineated in Work Order instructions or tasks x post maintenance testing is accurate and will o determine if the identified problem(s) have been corrected o could identify a different failure introduced by the work order o contains definitive acceptance criteria o incorporates applicable OE (past experience)

The package review for acceptance is a critical success factor to ensure the ability to complete the work as scheduled.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 12 OF 25 5.3 cont.

Print Information Copy Of WO Package Implementing Department Implementing Department Perform Walkdown Package Walkdown?

Implementing Dept.

Yes No If Required, Return WO To Planning WO Package Replanned/

Rescheduled As Needed The implementing group determines when a physical walk down is appropriate. The following should be performed when it is determined that a walk down is appropriate:

x all of package acceptance should be performed x hands on verification of material, reservation /

staging as required x physical confirmation of special tools and M&TE, reservation / staging as required x in-field walkdown of work site to include (examples) o physical environment (lighting, heat, cold, cramped conditions, etc.)

o verification of other activities scheduled in parallel (scope, location, scaffold, welding, sensitive work, etc.)

o any activities that may interfere with work in the area o Potential Industrial Safety issues If the work order is returned to planning for the incorporation of comments x Contact the Planner or enter feedback to planning via Action Tracking x If the work scope changes, return the package to Planning for additional planning

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 13 OF 25 5.3 cont.

During the T-2 week, the Planning Department, with Administrative Services assistance, prints a Master Copy of the work order package. All tasks containing detailed instructions for performing the task will be printed. Scaffold, insulation, and maintenance retest tasks will not normally be printed. Operation retests are printed when there is not a separate work order package to document the test results. The planner will indicate that tasks must be printed by checking the print box on the IAS work order task instructions (M102) panel.

x The Work Package will include:

o Task description, impact statement and work instructions o Attachments (as required) weld data sheets Parts/materials requests Drawings ASME repair/replacement FME sheet Valve data sheets Permits Operating Experience x Surveillance Work Packages will be in Red folders, PMs will be in Green folders, and EM, CM, OT maintenance will be in Yellow folders.

x

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 14 OF 25 5.3 cont.

The implementing department obtains materials and parts from the staging or storage area prior to the planned start of work.

The implementing department obtains tools and test equipment from the staging or storage area prior to the planned start of work.

Review communication requirements specified by the work order 0 - OPERATIONS HAS NOT APPROVED THIS WO TASK FOR WORK 1 - NO ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATIONS REQUIRED - START IAW SCHEDULE 2 - NOTIFY WORK CONTROL CENTER VIA PHONE PRIOR TO START OF WORK 3 - NOTIFY WORK CONTROL CENTER IN PERSON PRIOR TO START OF WORK 4 - NOTIFY CONTROL ROOM VIA PHONE PRIOR TO START OF WORK 5 - NOTIFY CONTROL ROOM IN PERSON PRIOR TO START OF WORK 6 - NOTIFY SECURITY SHIFT MANAGER PRIOR TO START OF WORK NOTE: Communication requirements are noted on the front of work order

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 15 OF 25 5.3 cont.

Verify all prerequisites have been met prior to setting the work order task to working x

Protective tags, permits, etc.

x Any soft holds must be removed before passport will allow the work order task to be set to working.

Permits are checked for effective dates and revalidated as required by the Approving group on the working day prior to or on the day that the work will commence.

The work activity is performed in accordance with the work package, site procedures, and company policies and guidelines. Except in the case of tool pouch maintenance, the work instructions shall be present at the work site during the performance of maintenance activities or the individual performing the work shall be in direct communication with the individual directing the activity per the Work Package. Scheduled work that is not completed at the end of the shift will be progressed in IAS with the time remaining until completion. The IAS Work Order Progression Work Flow is used for progressing scheduled work not completed by the end of shift.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 16 OF 25 5.3 cont.

A scope change has occurred if any of the following are identified during performance of the work:

x The additional scope is outside the tagging boundary.

x The activity is not covered by the PMT.

x The activity will change radiological controls or ALARA.

x The classification of the work activity will change (Compliance, Reference, Minor) such as:

- Additional components affected

- Goes outside skill of individual

- Complex activity added x Activity requires a change to the impact statement.

x The work instructions require revision other than a clarification or editorial change.

x Additional components or systems are affected.

x A part substitution is required.

x The change has the potential for an LCO entry.

x The acceptance criteria changes.

x The activity requires additional corrective maintenance for a preventive maintenance package.

x The change requires re-review by any of the groups involved in the initial review or creates the necessity for review by additional group.

If any of the above conditions are found during performance of the work activity, then additional actions are required prior to continuing the work.

These actions may include any of the following:

Re-planning and rescheduling the work package x

Revising the PMT x

Revising the Impact Statement x

Performing additional work package reviews x

Initiating a condition report when a new adverse condition is identified so that an operability review will be performed A decision will be made if the additional work can be accomplished in present work window. If not, the Work Order will be rescheduled.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 17 OF 25 5.3 cont.

Maintenance and operability tests are performed to ensure the maintenance was performed properly and no new equipment issues were introduced.

Maintenance that renders Technical Specifications required equipment inoperable must have Operability testing successfully completed prior to declaring the equipment operable. This testing is documented as a separate task on the Work Order.

Operations documents successful completion of the operability testing in (IAS) by setting this task to a Finished status.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 18 OF 25 5.4 WORK CLOSE OUT The Flow Chart represents the Work Order Close-Out Process. Each section of the process is explained on the following pages.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 19 OF 25 5.4 cont.

Worker completes input on WO task OPS review required Work Order Task goes to H/OPS OPS reviews and releases task for operability Task goes to Finished status YES NO Record created in Record Management Every Department is responsible for finishing their work order task rows in a timely manner to facilitate automatic schedule updates. This includes start and stop times, M&TE information, detailed description of work performed/parts replaced, UTC replacement information, feedback, and as found information (in or out of tolerance, material condition, etc.). If Operations review is required, then the task will go to the H/OPS status. If not, then the task will go to the Finished status.

Operations completes the Operability testing task or reviews the task if the Ops review required block was checked by the planner, and releases the task for Operability. The WO task will go to the Finished status.

Each work order task has a record place holder in the Records Management System. This allows scanning of any documentation created by the WO into the record. Documents that contain supplemental work order information with data, signatures must be scanned if not captured electronically in IAS.

All work order tasks where a Master copy of the task has been printed are required to have at least one page scanned to the record place holder unless supervision communicates to ASG that there is no documentation to scan. This action enables Records Management to ensure completeness of supplemental documents.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 20 OF 25 5.4 cont.

All WO Tasks Finished Supervisor reviews WO YES Report generated for outside review based on attributes in WO Task Any unused materials are returned to stores When all the Work Order Tasks are in the Finished status, the lead discipline supervisor reviews the Work Order Tasks for accuracy and completeness.

Unused materials are returned to the warehouse.

Items Returned to Stores are documented in Action Tracking and the material is tagged with the Action Request number.

In lieu of closure routing, groups that perform completion reviews are required to flag Work Orders with an appropriate attribute to ensure that the fleet based WEB report will display work orders requiring closure review. The correct attribute name is identified by Completion Route followed by the name of the reviewing group. The attribute may be assigned at any time, but is typically assigned when the work order is initially routed to the review group during the planning process. The Work Order Report - Attribute Search by WO identifies work orders requiring closure review. It is the responsibility of the reviewing groups to obtain the report and review applicable WO task(s).

This review is not required to complete the WO.

Groups that may be flagged to review the Work Order Task include:

IST Snubbers Check Valves Welding Engineering ASME Section XI Relief Valves AOV and MOV EQ ANSII

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 21 OF 25 5.4 cont.

Supervisor reviews WO Surveillance?

Surveillance Coordinator ensures the WO is taken to Complete Status Supervisor ensures WO is taken to Complete status YES NO If the WO is a Technical Specification Surveillance task, the Surveillance Coordinator reviews the WO and ensures the WO is taken to the complete status after verifying the surveillance PMRQ credit date.

For repetitive tasks, the First Line Supervisor (FLS) ensures the PMRQ is credited on the correct date by verifying the PMRQ credit date (M301 panel) reflects the correct date prior to setting the work order to COMPLETE Once the FLS review is finished, the WO is set to the complete status (except when the work order is a surveillance task as noted above).

When the Work Order is COMPLETE in (IAS) and the appropriate documentation has been scanned to placeholders where the Master has been printed, the electronic copy of the Work Order is established in records.

All supplemental documents should be transmitted within 30 days of setting the Work Order to COMPLETE status. If, for any reason, the Work Order status is reversed from COMPLETE, then a manual transmission of any modified records to the Records Management group is required.

Also notification to the Records Management group is required to ensure that the original record is not impacted.

QA records are generated by Reference Packages or Compliance Packages.

Those elements of a work package that are considered QA Records are specified in

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 22 OF 25.2.

All organizations requiring information from the work package are responsible for obtaining that information in process or following closure.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 23 OF 25 5.5 CANCELING OR CLOSING WORK ORDERS WITH NO WORK PERFORMED Work Orders may be canceled or closed without work performed if any of the following criteria is met:

A duplicate Work Order exists The problem no longer exists or cannot be duplicated The problem is added to another Work Order of the same type The PS/O Manager/Maintenance Manager establishes that it is not a problem or that it is not economical to work Operations approval prior to cancellation or closing is required for:

Corrective actions that are not addressed by the criteria above Work Orders coded as Ops Aggregate The reason for cancellation, new Work Order number, and authorizing individual should be noted as applicable.

Prior to a WO being closed with no work performed, the WO and CR will be presented to the CRG for discussion if the Work Order has been assigned the attribute CR CLOSED TO THIS ITEM?

6.0 INTERFACES Indus Asset Suite (IAS) 7.0 RECORDS All work package elements identified as QA records will be maintained pursuant to EN-AD-103.

8.0 OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS IMPLEMENTED BY THE PROCEDURE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Standards for Acceptable QA Records in Work Packages 9.2 Work Package QA Records

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 24 OF 25 ATTACHMENT 9.1 STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABLE QA RECORDS IN WORK PACKAGES Sheet 1 of 1 STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTABLE QA RECORDS IN WORK PACKAGES 1.

All entries shall be legible.

2.

Errors shall be lined through, initialed and dated.

3.

Date started is the date the work actually begins.

4.

Date completed is the date when Operations has accepted the work as complete and all required approvals are obtained..

5.

Work performed includes the as-found condition, corrective actions, and the results of post maintenance testing.

6.

Failure description is a brief narrative on the apparent cause of failure, if known. A reference to a Condition Report, if available, is sufficient.

7.

Cleanliness Control/FME is the documentation of the results of the cleanliness inspection prior to closure of safety-related systems or components.

8.

Engineering input is any record generated by an engineering organization, which was required to perform the work.

9.

Verification is the documentation of the activities performed to ensure a condition conforms to specified requirements.

10.

Post Maintenance Testing is the description of the testing performed and documentation of results.

11.

ASME records are those QA records specified by the organization responsible for compliance with the ASME B&PV codes.

12.

EQ Documentation are those QA records that demonstrate requirements for Equipment Qualification have been maintained.

13.

MOV Data sheets are records demonstrating compliance with NRC Generic Letter 89-10 commitments.

14.

Data Sheets are the records of quantitative or qualitative measurements, which are the basis for the success or failure of an activity important to quality.

15.

Vendor Information is documentation supplied by a vendor not directly controlled by the plant used to verify, clarify or support work instructions.

QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-102 REV. 2 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 25 OF 25 ATTACHMENT 9.2 WORK PACKAGE QA RECORDS Sheet 1 of 1 Work Package QA Records TYPES OF RECORDS Cover sheets Date started/Completed Materials Work performed Cause of failure/Failure description Procedure (where QA info. is recorded)

Work Instructions Cleanliness Control/FME Engineering input Lifted Leads/Verifications Post Maintenance Testing Torque Sheets EQ Documentation ASME Repair/Replacement MOV Data Sheet Data Sheets Vendor info. (When used to enhance work instructions)

Special process documentation Reactivity Screening documents