ML090410124

EN-WM-100, Rev. 3, Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification.

ML090410124
Person / Time
Site:	Palisades
Issue date:	01/30/2008
From:	Legere D Entergy Corp
To:	NRC Region 1
John Richmond
References
EN-WM-100, Rev 3
Download: ML090410124 (28)

Text

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 1 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification Procedure Contains NMM REFLIB Forms: YES X NO Effective Procedure Owner: Dennis Legere Executive Sponsor: Joseph P. DeRoy Date

Title:

Director, Outage and

Title:

VP, Ops Support Work Management 1/30/2008 Site: Site:

Echelon Echelon Exception Site Site Procedure Champion Title Date*

ANO James Hoffpauir Manager, P&SO GGNS Matthew Rohrer Manager, P&SO IPEC Joe DiChiara Manager, P&SO JAF Dave Wallace Manager, P&SO PNPS Arnold Owens Manager, P&SO RBS Brent Matherne Manager, P&SO VY Chris Wamser Manager, P&SO W3 Gregory Fey Manager, P&SO PLP Marty Richey Manager, P&SO Director Outages and HQN Dennis Legere Work Control Basis Statement This revision incorporated minor editorial changes and included applicability for Palisades station. This revision does not include any intent changes in process or guidance.

Site and NMM Procedures Canceled or Superseded By This Revision EN-WM-100, Rev. 2 Process Applicability Exclusion)

All Sites: Specific Sites: ANO GGNS IPEC JAF PNPS RBS VY W3 PLP

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 2 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 PURPOSE................................................................................ 3

2.0 REFERENCES

......................................................................... 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS........................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES................................................................. 8 5.0 DETAILS.................................................................................. 9 6.0 INTERFACES......................................................................... 21 7.0 RECORDS ............................................................................. 21 8.0 OBLIGATION AND REGULATORY COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCES.......................................................... 21 9.0 ATTACHMENTS .................................................................... 21 ATTACHMENT 9.1 ON LINE WR PRIORITY MATRIX............................. 23 ATTACHMENT 9.2 ON-LINE SCREENING FLOWCHART ...................... 24 ATTACHMENT 9.3 WR DEFICIENCY DESCRIPTION GUIDANCE......... 25 ATTACHMENT 9.4 EXAMPLE HARD COPY WR/WO ............................. 26 ATTACHMENT 9.5 EXAMPLE WR SCREENING COMMITTEE REPORT27 ATTACHMENT 9.6 IAS WORK REQUEST PROCESSING

SUMMARY

... 28

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 3 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification 1.0 PURPOSE

[1] To describe the process used for generation, screening, and classification of Work Requests (WRs).

2.0 REFERENCES

[1] ANSI N18.7 - 1976, Administrative Control and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants

[2] Entergy Quality Assurance Program Manual (QAPM)

[3] EN-WM-101, On-Line Work Management Process

[4] INPO 97-013, Guidelines for the Conduct of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Stations

[5] INPO Guideline AP-928, Work Management Process Description

[6] EN-LI-102, Corrective Action Process

[7] 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(3) & (a)(4) 3.0 DEFINITIONS

[1] Equipment Number - A unique alphanumeric identification assigned to permanent plant components.

[2] Emergency Maintenance: The correction of a condition or deficiency that:

(a) Constitutes an immediate and direct threat to the health and safety of the public.

(b) Requires immediate attention to prevent deterioration of plant conditions to a possible unsafe or unstable level, which would then constitute an immediate and direct threat to the health and safety of the public.

(c) Poses a significant industrial hazard that must be corrected immediately to prevent or mitigate actual serious injury or death.

The Shift Manager can authorize the immediate start of repair efforts, in parallel with initiation and planning of a Priority 1 Work Request/Work Order. The Work Order should be completed as soon as practical to document the repairs.

[3] Expedited Work Order - Work determined to be Emergency Maintenance where the need exists, as determined by the Shift Manager, to commence work in the field prior to detailed work package planning. The work performed under an expedited work order must be that which can be characterized as skill-of-the-craft. An expedited work order is not a routine activity, but may be utilized in situations where an immediate threat is

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 4 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification present to personnel safety. The Shift Manager is responsible for assessing the risk of performing work under an expedited work order.

[4] Indus Asset Suite (IAS) - The Software product used by the Entergy Fleet for Work Management, Engineering Change, Materials Purchasing and Contracts and for the creation of new controlled documents and revisions to controlled documents (controlled document information populates EDMS via an interface).

[5] Job Type - The code that identifies at the TASK level the type of work to be performed.

Refer to EN-WM-105. The following definitions characterize the equipment degradation aspects of the identified issue:

(a) Corrective Maintenance - The classification of any work on power block systems, structures, or components (SSCs) where the SSC has failed or is significantly degraded to the point that failure is imminent (within its operating cycle/PM interval) and no longer conforms to or is incapable of performing the SSCs design function. An SSC should be considered failed or significantly degraded if the deficiency is similar to any of the following examples:

Is removed from service because of actual or incipient failure Significant component degradation that affects system operability -The SSC may be determined operable by engineering assessment, but the degradation is significant and requires immediate corrective action. This normally includes any deficiency that requires a basis for continued operation as defined in NRC Generic Letter 91-18, and should be considered as corrective maintenance.

Creates the potential for rapidly increasing component degradation.

Releases fluids that create significant exposure or contamination concerns. Minor leaks that can be controlled and managed by simple drip catch containments would not be included here.

Significant component degradation identified from the conduct of predictive, periodic, or preventive maintenance which, if not resolved, could result in equipment failure or significant additional damage prior to its next scheduled preventive maintenance period.

(b) Elective Maintenance - The classification of any work on power block equipment in which potential or actual degradation is minor and does not threaten the components design function or performance criteria, and the failure of a non-significant component that does not threaten the systems design function or performance criteria:

Minor leaks that do not justify immediate action to repair

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 5 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification Minor degradation identified by predictive, periodic, or planned preventive maintenance activities that warrant attention to maintain the long-term reliability of the equipment but is not expected to result in failure prior to its next scheduled preventive maintenance period.

Other minor plant equipment deficiencies that do not affect plant operation, nuclear or plant reliability or the ability of station operators to properly respond to normal, off-normal, or accident transients or conditions.

(c) Other Maintenance - The classification of work not reflecting a material condition deficiency on station power block equipment. The following would be included in this classification:

Proactive actions to enhance station equipment performance that are not directly related to existing deficiencies (betterment activities)

Work efforts to rebuild removed components for return to stock and reuse at the later date Pre-outage work required to support planned or forced outage activities Minor deficiency monitoring (MDM) work Investigations or inspections on fully functional power block or non-power-block equipment related to industry operating experience or generic issues.

(d) Toolpouch Maintenance - Toolpouch Maintenance consists of work that requires no documentation in permanent plant records and is within the skill of the individual to perform. This includes standard nuclear power plant work practices such as control of consumable materials, tool control and radiological work practices. It may be corrected in the field by the individual identifying the deficiency, or corrected by another qualified person. A work request is initiated to track tool pouch work when the issue is not corrected at the time of identification. The work request is processed using the Open Minor Maintenance IAS option.

(e) Contingency Maintenance - Work to be performed if a component is found to be in a degraded state during other repairs or inspections. Contingency work is not counted in the corrective, elective, or other maintenance backlog.

[6] Minor Deficiency Monitoring (MDM) process - A process for the management of low-level maintenance deficiencies whose significance is such that it would not prudently warrant taking the equipment out of service to repair by itself. All MDM activities would be defined as Other maintenance (priority 5F), irrespective of power

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 6 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification block determination. Stations shall ensure that MDM items are clearly identified and tracked using work order attributes to allow ready identification and consideration for inclusion if the equipment is removed from service for other reasons, or if further degradation would raise the significance of the deficiency. Formal tracking and monitoring programs are required and the EPRI modeled leak monitoring is an example. Stations must ensure that periodic cross-functional reviews are performed (minimum annual review) on the total inventory of MDM maintenance activities to ensure that the significance of these deficiencies, individually or in the aggregate, has not changed and that they are correctly grouped in this category.

[7] Minor Maintenance - Work that can be conducted using Skill of the Craft without detailed written work instructions and meets the following criteria:

No power reduction No risk significant work No entry into a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) / Allowed Outage Time (AOT)

No entry into a Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) time clock Does not impact safety related functions or environmental qualification Limited impact on resources external to the performing group - minimal coordination Limited special controls (General access Radiation Work Permits (RWPs), as an example)

No welding on plant equipment No complex work No plant configuration changes No impact on program requirements (e.g. ,MOV, AOV, ISI, IST)

No impact on reactivity management; no impact on the ability to monitor, measure, or control reactor power or fuel criticality status.

[8] Predictive Maintenance (PDM) - The application of inspection and diagnostics based analysis methods to monitor and trend the performance or functional condition of equipment and to warn of impending failure or degradation of components.

[9] Priority - Work Requests and Work Orders are assigned a priority based on the

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 7 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification significance of the condition identified. For on line work, the priority is determined in accordance with Attachment 9.1. Each priority state is shown below along with guidelines for starting the work.

Priority 1: Begin immediately following planning of the work order and work around the clock.

Priority 2: Schedule at earliest opportunity within T-3.

Priority 3: Schedule at next available system week within the 12 week process or next available system window.

Priority 4: Schedule as resources allow within the normal process.

Priority 5: Work only when time allows (fill in activity).

Priority 8: Outage work where performance is mandatory (required / de-rate)

Priority 9: Outage work where performance is discretionary (potential)

[10] Power Block Equipment - All SSCs required for the safe and reliable operation of the station. It will include all safety-related and balance-of-plant system and components required for the operation of the station, including radioactive waste processing and storage, and switchyard equipment maintained by the station. Systems, structures, or components required to maintain federal or state regulatory compliance should be included in this grouping. This classification does not include buildings or structures that support station staff, such as offices or storage structures, or the HVAC and support systems focused only on habitability of those structures.

[11] Skill Of The Craft - A task that workers are familiar with and experienced in performing, which are not complex in the actions required and are common to their craft.

Familiarity may have been gained through training or on the job performance. To perform the task safely and successfully, the worker would not require further instruction or oversight.

[12] Work Instructions - A set of work steps included in a work package provided to direct how work is to be accomplished.

[13] Work Request Screening Committee - The Work Request Screening Committee, chaired by Scheduling, meets each normal workday and reviews WRs contained on the work screening report (Attachment 9.5). The standard report is WEB based and includes work requests that have not been previously converted to work orders or approved as toolpouch, and includes all work requests generated since the previous meeting.

, Scheduling will review the work screening report prior to the meeting and provide

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 8 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification suggested schedule dates for any work requests where the proposed scheduled date is inside T-15.

At a minimum, the following site departments/personnel are members of the Work Request Screening Committee:

Operations Engineering Planning Scheduling Maintenance (knowledgeable of the division and scope of work between the Mechanical, Electrical, I&C, and FIN team areas of responsibility)

[14] Work Request - (WR) The document used to identify items for screening to determine if it will be processed via the work order process. Toolpouch work is tracked by a work request when the issue is not corrected at the time of identification.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

[1] The Director PS&O is responsible for the maintenance of this procedure.

[2] The Planning and Scheduling/Outage Manager or designee is responsible for direction and oversight to ensure proper classification and prioritization of work activities.

[3] Engineering Managers or designees are responsible for direction and oversight to ensure Engineering input to the Work Request Screening Committee with respect to priority and work requests that identify key system health issues.

[4] The Shift Manager (SM) is responsible for direction and oversight pertaining to the following:

Identifying plant conditions or situations that warrant Emergency Maintenance Identifying plant conditions or situations that warrant Priority 1 Maintenance Determining the need for an Expedited Work Order for Priority 1 Maintenance Assessing the risk of performing work under an Expedited Work Order Ensuring OPS assessment of new work requests is performed each shift Communicating emergent work issues to the Work Week Manager

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 9 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification

[5] The Planning Supervisor is responsible for:

Inputting data to IAS received from the Work Request Screening Committee and converting the appropriate work requests to work orders. Work Requests should be converted to Work Orders within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of classification.

Starts the cancellation process for WRs identified for cancellation during the WR screening meeting.

Documenting the justification for canceling a work request in IAS.

Ensuring the review of work requests classified as Corrective or Elective for extensive Engineering Support and Long Lead time parts within 2 working days of classification

[6] Scheduling is responsible for chairing the Work Request Screening Committee and providing suggested schedule dates based on their knowledge of future schedules.

[7] All plant personnel are responsible for initiating WRs to document needed repairs, if Toolpouch maintenance cannot be performed.

5.0 DETAILS 5.1 PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS None 5.2 WR GENERATION

[1] The WR generation, screening and classification flow charts are shown below. The table following the flow charts contains an explanation of each part of the process.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 10 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT MANUAL INFORMATIONAL USE 11 of 28 Work Request (WR) Generation, Screening and Classification

[2] The Work Request generation, screening and classification flow charts are shown below. The table following the flow charts contains explanation of each part of the process:

Work Requests Converted to Work B Orders Since Last Screening Meeting Are Reviewed By the Screening Committee Is WR Work description Request WR Prioritization complete needed?

A Yes and accurate? Yes (Attachment 9.1 &

Section 3.0)

Screening Screening Committee Committee Screening Committee No No Reject WR Clarify Description Planning Originator Determine Need Unit Condition Determine Date (Pri 1 & 2, at Work Package Required, Boric Planning Center &

minimum) & Job Type Acid, & Leaker List Discipline Type Screening Screening Screening Screening Committee Committee Committee Committee Is work request Can work be Toolpouch Is work request Minor performed on-line Planning &

No Maintenance No (Attachment 9.2) ? Yes Scheduling Process Screening Screening Screening Committee Committee Committee Yes Yes No Open as minor Convert to minor Outage Scope maintenance work maintenance work Review Team request order Planning Planning

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 12 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

The individual discovering the deficiency, or another person, can repair it, if qualified to do so, Deficiency utilizing Toolpouch Maintenance, and if:

Identified the activity does not affect a safety related function there is no risk of a plant transient the activity does not require either a procedure, work instructions or material other than consumable Toolpouch Maintenance No the activity does not involve work on ASME Code or EQ equipment Originator the activity does not alter plant configuration the activity is not complex and is within the skill of the personnel Yes the activity does not affect a Maintenance Rule function Perform work now the activity requires no additional support beyond that for normal plant access Originator If the requirements for Toolpouch Maintenance are not met, the identifier should generate a WR in IAS. IAS required actions for Work Request Is there a Initiation, Operability Screening and Classification duplicate open Initiate WR WR?

No are contained in Attachment 9.6.

Originator Originator The identifier of the activity provides the following information:

Yes Originator name (Defaults in IAS)

No Further Action The date identified (Defaults in IAS)

Necessary identification of the component including Equipment Number A description of the deficiency (Attach. 9.3)

Recommended solution, if known

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 13 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

If the deficiency meets any of the following criteria, the Shift Manager shall be notified immediately.

Safety or operations it is potentially reportable impacted? No it affects the operability or functionality of a Originator safety related system it could cause a plant trip or transient it presents an immediate threat to personnel or equipment safety Yes The Shift Manager uses the information provided Notify Shift by the identifier to determine whether work should Manager be started prior to the next Work Request Immediately Screening meeting.

Originator A Condition Report may be required in accordance with applicable site corrective action program requirements.

If plant conditions meet the requirements of Emergency Maintenance, the Shift Manager may direct work activities to begin immediately, prior to the generation of a WR. When time permits an Urgent - Priority 1 WR should be initiated. For Emergency Maintenance, any or all steps in the work control process can be bypassed at the discretion of Shift Manager. The work performed shall be documented at the completion of the work.

The SM ensures Operability Screening is performed for new work requests each shift.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 14 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

If the Shift Manager (SM) determines that the Priority 1 Work Item?

Perform Operability work process should start immediately, SM Assessment Shift No prioritizes the WR as Priority 1 and assigns the Manager Operations WR to an implementing department, and performs the screening and classification. The SM contacts Yes the appropriate personnel to initiate the planning of the work package and to begin repairs.

Perform Operability Expedited Work Assessment Order Needed Yes For Priority 1 work, the SM may elect to initiate an Shift Operations Manager expedited work order to allow work to commence Expedite Work Request in the field prior to completion of detailed work No Approval, Convert to package planning. The work performed under an Expedited Work Order And Perform Operability Initiate Further Planning As expedited work order must be that which can be Assessment Needed characterized as skill-of-the-craft. An expedited Shift Manager Operations work order is not a routine activity, but may be utilized in situations where an immediate threat is Craft Commences Initiate Planning Work present to personnel or equipment safety, or Process Maintenance station availability. The Shift Manager is Shift Manager responsible for assessing the risk of performing work under an expedited work order.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 15 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

The Work Request Screening Committee reviews WRs on the next normal working day. The meeting is chaired by Scheduling. The Planning Supervisor, or designee, inputs the data that results from the meeting for each work request.

The Planning Supervisor / designee is responsible for identifying and initiating the work request cancellation process. Justification for canceling a work request will be based on the criteria below.

The Planning Supervisor / designee will document the justification for canceling a work request in IAS.

The Planning Supervisor may cancel a WR if any of the following criteria are met:

a duplicate WR exists the problem no longer exists or cannot be duplicated the problem is added to another WR or WO WR that requests a modification to the plant may be canceled to the plant configuration change process.

A WR may not be canceled to a repetitive task until the task has been completed.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 16 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

The Work Request Screening Committee reviews the information on the WR to determine whether the component identification and description of the deficiency provide an adequate basis for planning, scheduling and equipment history. If the information provided is not adequate, the Work Request Screening Committee will assign an individual to obtain and bring this information back to the committee.

If changes are made to the WR, which may affect operability, functionality, or additional planning and scheduling is required; then the individual that made the changes is responsible for notifying the departments affected, and the Shift Manager.

If Loss of Redundant Equipment will cause a reduction in generation capacity or loss of a function or the system aggregate changes due to deficiency then re-prioritize per Attachment 9.1.

(Prioritization Matrix)

The Work Request Screening Committee prioritizes the WR using the definitions in Section 3.0 and Attachment 9.1 for guidance.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 17 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

The Work Request Screening Committee determines the Need date for Priority 1 and Priority 2 work requests (subject to WWM approval), at a minimum. Need dates for Priority 3, 4 and 5 work requests may be assigned. Unit Coordinator Scheduling will review the work request screening report prior to the meeting and provide suggested dates for any work requests where the proposed schedule date is inside T-15.

The Work Request Screening Committee determines the maintenance job type (Corrective, Elective, Other or Contingency maintenance).

The Work Request Screening Committee determines the Unit Condition Required and; Boric Acid and Leaker List applicability.

The Work Request Screening Committee determines the Planning Center and Discipline.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 18 OF 28 MANUAL The Work Request Screening Committee determines the maintenance level (Compliance, Reference or Minor Maintenance).

5.2[2] cont.

The Work Request Screening Committee determines whether work is Toolpouch. Any work request that is designated as Toolpouch is dispositioned as a Minor Maintenance work request.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 19 OF 28 MANUAL The Work Request Screening Committee determines whether work is Minor Maintenance.

Any work request that is designated as Minor Maintenance is subsequently converted to a Minor Maintenance work order.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 20 OF 28 MANUAL 5.2[2] cont.

The Work Request Screening Committee determines if work can safely be performed on-line, using Attachment 9.2. Any work that is designated as requiring an outage is subsequently reviewed by the Outage Scope Review Team.

Work designated for on-line performance is factored into the scheduling process in accordance with WM-101, On-Line Work Management Process.

5.3 PROVISION FOR HARDCOPY WORK REQUESTS

[1] In the event that Indus Asset Suite (IAS) is inoperative for an extended period of time, work requests should be handwritten. Attachment 9.4 is to be used to hand write a work request.

[2] The initiator obtains a blank copy of attachment 9.4, and fills in Unit, Equipment Number, Equipment Name, Condition Description, Date/Time Reported, and applicable Condition Report number, if any.

[3] The handwritten work request is brought to the Work Management Center during normal working hours; for other than normal working hours it is taken to the applicable Control Room.

[4] An applicable Operations SRO performs the operability review and signs the work

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 21 OF 28 MANUAL request

[5] During normal working hours, work requests deemed to meet Priority 1 criteria by the Shift Manager will be given to the Planning Supervisor to plan the work package; for other than normal working hours the SM contacts the appropriate personnel to initiate the planning of the work package.

[6] Work requests not meeting Priority 1 criteria are collected at the Work Management Center, and screened at the work request screening meeting. The Planning Supervisor retains the work requests following screening for entry into IAS when it becomes available.

[7] Work requests not meeting Priority 1 criteria are usually not planned until IAS has returned to service due to the quality control built into the IAS process. The Work Week Manager will determine the need to plan a hand written non-Priority 1 work order.

[8] The hand written work request will be the cover sheet for the hand written work order.

EN-WM-105 Planning will be used as the guide to provide as complete a hand written work order as possible.

6.0 INTERFACES

[1] Indus Asset Suite (IAS) 7.0 RECORDS None 8.0 OBLIGATION AND REGULATORY COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCES Document Document Section NMM Procedure Section Site Applicability QAPM B.1.C 3.0[2], 3.0[9], 5.2 All 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 On Line WR Priority Matrix 9.2 On-Line Screening Flow Chart

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 22 OF 28 MANUAL 9.3 Work Request Deficiency Description Guidance 9.4 Example Hard Copy WR 9.5 Example Work Request Screening Committee Report 9.6 IAS Work Request Processing

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 23 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.1 ON LINE WR PRIORITY MATRIX PRIORITIZATION MATRIX WORK TYPE Power Block Non-Power Block Buildings &

Failure or Failure or Component Hoist, M&TE, Support COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION Significant Significant Degraded or Shop Work, Systems, WORK SIGNIFICANCE Degradation with Degradation Non- Enhancement Grounds, System with System Significant Mods, Tools Inoperable or Operable and Component Pre-outage, Site Unavailable Available failure MDM Betterment Corrective Corrective Elective Other Other CLASS 10 8 6 4 3 Technical Specification AOT Entry 100 80 60 40 Regulatory Non-compliance X (1A) (2A) (3B) (4A)

Maintenance rule risk significant system function affected 10 Risk to or loss of generation Significant:

Personnel Safety Concern Control Room Deficiency Security Deficiency 90 72 54 36 27 Control Room Annunciator (1B) (2B) (3D) (4B) (4F)

Operator workaround Key System Health Issue Fire Impairment Maint Rule(a)(1) Action 9 ALARA or Equip Safety Concern 80 64 48 32 24 Regulatory Compliance Threat (2A) (3A) (3F) (4C) (4G)

PDM Required Action 8 Operator Burden 70 56 42 28 21 Out Of Spec Reading (2C) (3C) (3G) (4E) (4H)

Ops Concern 7 All other maintenance rule systems 60 48 36 24 18 Non-significant Control (3B) (3F) (4B) (4G) (5A)

Room Deficiency 6 50 40 30 20 15 Balance of plant systems 5 (3E) (4A) (4D) (4I) (5C)

Minor security issue 40 32 24 16 12 Minor safety or ALARA issue 4 (4A) (4C) (4G) (5B) (5D)

Building & structures & 12 9 X X X support systems 3 (5D) (5E)

Grounds 8 6 Tools X X X (5F) (5G)

All other 2 PRI NORMAL SCHEDULING GUIDANCE**

EMER See section 3.0 for emergency maintenance requirements 1 Red (100-90) = Begin immediately following work order planning and work around the clock 2 Yellow (89-70) = Schedule at earliest opportunity within T-3 Orange (69-42) = Schedule at next available system week within 12 week process or next 3 available system window 4 White (41-19) = Schedule as resources allow within the normal process 5 Green (18-1) = Work only when time allows (fill-in activity)

Point Values = Class X Work Type and is for information only

• • Exceptions to normal guidance will be controlled and approved by appropriate management.

Note: Alpha-numerical ratings are used to signify sub-classifications of each priority.

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 24 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.2 ON-LINE SCREENING FLOWCHART Sheet 1 of 1 All work will be performed on-line unless it meets one of the following criteria to be assigned as outage work. Any exception to this guidance shall require concurrance of the Outage Scope Review Team YES OUTAGE

1. The activity requires entry into Technical Specification 3.0.3/3.0.C action statement?

SCOPE NO YES

2. The activity causes SSC unavailability resulting in a RED instantaneous On-Line risk?

NO

3. The activity requires the unit to be in cold shutdown, refueling or defueled? YES NO

4. It is highly likely that the entire work scope will exceed any of the TS/TRM completion times requiring YES shutdown?

NO YES

5. The activity includes significant personnel safety or radiation hazards that exist only if done on-line?

NO

6. The activity requires a local leak rate test that cannot be performed at-power? YES NO

7. The activity requires a PMT or other operability test that cannot be performed on-line and the time YES from work completion to PMT completion is unacceptable?

NO

8. The activity breaches primary containment? YES NO

9. The activity poses an unacceptable risk to unit availability? YES NO ONLINE 10. The activity requires YES 11. Is there significant YES a load reduction? UCLF impact?

NO NO

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 25 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.3 WR DEFICIENCY DESCRIPTION GUIDANCE Sheet 1 of 1 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

1. Unacceptable - Valve leaks Acceptable - Valve packing leak; no adjustment left; leaking ~10 drops/minute

2. Unacceptable - Motor does not start Acceptable - Motor does not start; motor rotates by hand; breaker does not appear tripped

3. Unacceptable - Indication cannot be calibrated in Spec Acceptable - Indication out of calibration in low range; reads 5 psi high; appears bourdon tube damaged.

WHAT IS THE MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM?

1. Approximately 1/2 gpm leak

2. Not repeatable, unreliable, do not use HOW DISCOVERED

1. During maintenance

2. During surveillance

3. During Post Maintenance Testing

3. During walk down, manager observation INFORMATION OR CONCERNS

1. Leakage may impinge on MCC if it worsens

2. Was noisy during prior shift.

3. Out of acceptable tolerance at 20 psig, (13psig Setpoint, 8psig-18psig)

ADDITONAL LOCATION INFORMATION

1. Include CLARIFYING location information (e.g. above tank, below grating, near column row etc.)

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 26 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.4 EXAMPLE HARD COPY WR/WO Sheet 1 of 1 Unit: Date/Time Reported:

Equipment Number: Equipment Name:

Condition Report #:

Condition

Description:

Operability Review (SRO Signature):

Attach Work Instructions, Including Post Peer Review:

Maintenance Testing Requirements Permits: Hold Card/Clearance:

RWP:

References:

Parts:

Workers: Man-hours:

As Found Conditions:

Work Performed:

Completed Date/Time:

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 27 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.5 EXAMPLE WR SCREENING COMMITTEE REPORT Sheet 1 of 1

NUCLEAR QUALITY RELATED EN-WM-100 REV. 3 MANAGEMENT INFORMATIONAL USE PAGE 28 OF 28 MANUAL ATTACHMENT 9.6 IAS WORK REQUEST PROCESSING

SUMMARY

Sheet 1 of 1 Work Request Initiation If the requirements for Tool pouch Maintenance are not met, the identifier generates a WR by logging in to IAS.

The identifier of the activity provides the following information:

identification of the component including Equipment Number a detailed description of the deficiency (Attach. 9.3) recommended solution, if known The work request is initiated (IAS displays the WR number) when the originator records the problem description and selects Enter or Apply. This action sets up a series route path to Operations (SRO) for Operability Screening and Classification for action. New work requests are routed to Engineering for Information only.

The identifier must submit the request for Operability Screening by selecting the OK button after the work request number is displayed. This action changes the Work Request status from ORIG To H/APPR, sends a AAA message to Operations SRO alert group members and routes the Work request into Operations inbox for operability screening.

Operability Screening When a new work request is submitted for approval, The SM ensures Operability Screening is performed for new work requests each shift. WRs requiring Operability Screening may be accessed by SROs in the Operations SRO alert group by selecting the ALERTS button on the IAS toolbar. Upon completing the operability screening, the SRO selects the Option to Approve Work Request. IAS captures the approving SRO signature electronically and the WR is routed to the Classification inbox for disposition by the Planning Supervisor/designee.

Classification The Planning Supervisor/designee accesses the Work Flow for Work Request Screening and enters the following information: Priority, Job Type, Disc, Planning Center, Unit Condition required. The need date may be entered and the outage indicator is checked if the Unit Condition Required is 5. The Approve Work Request button is enabled after required fields are entered and the Planning Supv. / designee approves the work request. The Work Request status is changed from H/APPR to APPROVED. For tool pouch maintenance, the work request status is changed to Minor Maintenance request and is not converted to a work order. Approved work requests not opened as Minor Maintenance enter the work order process described in WM-105 Planning