ML081820859
| ML081820859 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 07/07/2008 |
| From: | Tam P NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| To: | Rencheck M Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Tam P | |
| References | |
| BL-07-001, TAC MD7590, TAC MD7591 | |
| Download: ML081820859 (6) | |
Text
July 7, 2008 Mr. Michael W. Rencheck Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT:
DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: SECURITY BULLETIN 2007-01 SECURITY OFFICER ATTENTIVENESS (TAC NOS. MD7590 AND MD7591)
Dear Mr. Rencheck:
By letter dated February 11, 2008, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) submitted the required written response to Security Bulletin 2007-01 Security Officer Attentiveness for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The response was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(f) and 10 CFR 70.22(d).
The NRC staff has reviewed I&Ms submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete the final assessment of your response. Security Bulletin 2007-01 requested licensees to provide information regarding administrative and managerial programs and controls established to prevent, identify, and correct security personnel inattentiveness, complicity, and failures to implement the behavioral observation program by individuals among licensee security personnel including security contractors and subcontractors. The NRC staff will use the additional information received to inform the Commission and to determine if further regulatory action is warranted or if additional assessment of licensee program implementation is needed.
The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. We request your response within 35 days of the date of issuance of this letter. Before submitting your response, you should evaluate it for proprietary, sensitive, safeguards, or classified information and handle such information appropriately. If you have any question, please contact me at 301-415-1451.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: See next page
Mr. Michael W. Rencheck July 7, 2008 Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT:
DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: SECURITY BULLETIN 2007-01 SECURITY OFFICER ATTENTIVENESS (TAC NOS. MD7590 AND MD7591)
Dear Mr. Rencheck:
By letter dated February 11, 2008, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) submitted the required written response to Security Bulletin 2007-01 Security Officer Attentiveness for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The response was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(f) and 10 CFR 70.22(d).
The NRC staff has reviewed I&Ms submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete the final assessment of your response. Security Bulletin 2007-01 requested licensees to provide information regarding administrative and managerial programs and controls established to prevent, identify, and correct security personnel inattentiveness, complicity, and failures to implement the behavioral observation program by individuals among licensee security personnel including security contractors and subcontractors. The NRC staff will use the additional information received to inform the Commission and to determine if further regulatory action is warranted or if additional assessment of licensee program implementation is needed.
The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. We request your response within 35 days of the date of issuance of this letter. Before submitting your response, you should evaluate it for proprietary, sensitive, safeguards, or classified information and handle such information appropriately. If you have any question, please contact me at 301-415-1451.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL3-1 r/f RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource LRegner, NRR/DORL MBanic, NRR/DPR FPeduzzi, NSIR RCorreia, NSIR RidsNrrLATHarris RidsNrrPMPTam Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession Number: ML081820859 OFFICE LPL3-1/PM LPL3-1/LA NSIR*
LPL3-1/BC NAME PTam THarris LJames DATE 7/1/08 7/1/08 7/1/08
- See package of e-mails from NSIR (Accession No. ML081820158)
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVIEW OF RESPONSE TO SECURITY BULLETIN 2007-01 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NO. 50-315 AND 50-316 In responding to each of the following questions, the licensee should provide information that addresses measures that are currently in place, and any additional planned actions with expected completion dates.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1a and requests the following additional information:
(1)
Describe the process for security post rotations including the rotation process for isolated positions. Include the following information in your response:
A description of the security post rotation process including, but not limited to: (1) a discussion of the types of posts a typical security officer would rotate through during a normal shift; (2) a discussion on whether the type of activity (i.e. roving or foot patrol or stationary in a Bullet Resisting Enclosure (BRE)) performed at each individual post is taken into consideration when a security officer moves from post to post throughout the shift; and (3) the length of time at each post. When responding, particular emphasis should be placed on whether the licensee takes into consideration the activities associated with each post assignment when formulating its post rotation schedules for each shift (i.e., rotating from foot patrol to BRE to Vital Area patrol, or rotating from BRE to ready room to BRE, etc.)
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1b. and requests the following additional information:
(2)
Describe any licensee processes or programs that are in place to identify problems in climate controlled security areas. What methods are used to track, inspect, and ensure timely repairs are completed? Include the following information in your response:
A description of how the security areas are maintained, including, but not limited to: (1) a discussion of the maintenance and/or preventive maintenance process and programs in place for these security areas including an overview and brief discussion on routine inspection schedules by maintenance personnel; (2) a discussion on the process a security officer can follow to report concerns with the up keep and maintenance of his or her post; and (3) a discussion on the timeliness of repairs and any follow up actions taken by the licensee to ensure the repairs are completed and resolved adequately.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1c. and requests the following additional information:
(3)
What is the level of involvement from management personnel who do not have direct responsibility for the security program (including executive and corporate management)
in conducting behavior observations of security personnel? Include the following information in your response:
A description of any processes in place for licensee and/or contract management personnel, who work day to day at the site or visit the site on a routine basis from a corporate office or other applicable offsite location, for conducting behavior observations of security personnel while on duty at their assigned posts. Examples should include, but are not limited to, a discussion of random or scheduled observations conducted by licensee and/or contract management personnel such as the Plant Operations Shift Managers or other Plant Operations Shift Supervisors, Plant Maintenance Supervisors (licensee and contractor), or Quality Assurance Supervisors etc. The discussion should include whether these random or scheduled observations are proceduralized and the required or recommended level of licensee and/or contract management involvement.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1 and requests the following additional information:
(4)
Are security personnel provided opportunities to participate in any personnel surveys regarding the work environment? If so, what is the frequency of the surveys, the average participation rate of security personnel as compared to the general site average, and the process for providing feedback and addressing the results from the survey?
(5)
How is the licensees policy regarding site employee attentiveness and/or inattentiveness communicated to personnel, both licensee and contractor, and at what frequency?
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 2 and requests the following additional information:
(6)
Describe the process for employees to file reports through the site corrective action program (CAP). Can employees file CAP reports without prior supervisory/management review or approval? Include the following information in your response:
Describe the process for employees to file reports through the CAP. Discuss the supervisor/management review and/or approval process including, but not limited to:
(1) does a supervisor/manager have the authority to reject a report before entering it into the corrective action program without additional management review and approval; and (2) does a supervisor/manager have the authority to modify the report before such report has been entered into the CAP.
(7)
Can the employees view the status and disposition of reports directly, or must this information be requested? If yes, please describe the process.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 4 and requests the following additional information:
(8)
Are formal assessments of the security program conducted by organizations/individuals that do not have direct responsibility for the security program? If so, provide information on the process, including, but not limited to, the organizations and levels of management involved, the frequency of such activities, and any tracking of how findings are resolved.
(9)
How are self-assessment findings and relevant operating experience information communicated to the security force? Describe those processes, including, but not limited to, information such as the criteria by which such information is identified, the frequency of such communications, the responsible department(s) or position(s) for such communications, and the recipients of such communications. Include the following information in your response:
Describe the process including, but not limited to: (1) formal or informal communication methods; (2) procedures that ensure availability of the policy to the staff; and (3) training opportunities for the staff to read and understand the policy.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 5 and requests the following additional information:
(10)
How do you assess the effectiveness of your oversight of contractors and subcontractors? Include the following information in your response:
Describe the licensees program for oversight of contractors and subcontractors including, but not limited to: (1) a brief overview and description of the licensees procedures that describe the oversight process; (2) include a detailed list (bulleted is preferred) of assigned duties for the licensee supervisor(s) or manager(s) responsible for overseeing contractors and subcontractors at the site; (3) include a detailed list (bulleted is preferred) of the assigned duties for the contractor and subcontractor supervisor(s) or manager(s) responsible for overseeing the contractor and subcontractor staff at the site; and (4) a brief discussion of the corporate (management) involvement with the oversight of contractors and subcontractors at the site.
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Attorney General Department of Attorney General 525 West Ottawa Street Lansing, MI 48913 Township Supervisor Lake Township Hall P.O. Box 818 Bridgman, MI 49106 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector's Office 7700 Red Arrow Highway Stevensville, MI 49127 Kimberly Harshaw, Esquire Indiana Michigan Power Company One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Mayor, City of Bridgman P.O. Box 366 Bridgman, MI 49106 Special Assistant to the Governor Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, MI 48909 James M. Petro, Jr.
Regulatory Affairs Manager Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Waste and Hazardous Materials Div.
Radiological Protection Section Radiological Assessment Unit Constitution Hall, Lower-Level North 525 West Allegan Street P. O. Box 30241 Lansing, MI 48909-7741 Joel P. Gebbie, Plant Manager Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 Lawrence J. Weber, Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106