ML081690802

Meeting Summary on FitzPatrick AA Meeting - Feedback Form

ML081690802
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	05/29/2008
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC Region 1
References
MN 08-010
Download: ML081690802 (2)

Text

PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK

SUMMARY

MN NO:08-010 Meeting Date: April 8, 2008 Meeting Location: Joint News Center, Osweqo County Airport, Fulton, NY Meeting Purpose/Licensee: Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Northeast to discuss the NRCs annual assessment of the safety performance of the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant for the calendar year 2007.

Was the overall public perception of the meeting POSITIVE or NEGATIVE? POSITIVE Summary of feedback received (consider the factors described on the next page):

The opportunity to speak with the NRC staff after the meeting was particularly valuable.

Any useful suggestions / ideas: There were no useful suggestions or ideas provided in the feedback forms.

Constructive criticism (what can be improved): None provided Actions recommended as a result of feedback received: None.

Other actions planned: None.

Individual feedback form information was entered into the Public Meeting Feedback System.

Branch Chief Meeting Sponso Division Director G:\DRP\BRANCH2\MEETlNGS\2008 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT MEETINGS\FITZ\FITZ PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK

SUMMARY

.DOC

Factors to consider in summary of feedback received:

1. Provide some perspective regarding the meeting atmosphere. For example, was the public concerned because of some earlier event? What recent news had motivated people to come to the meeting?

2. Were people expecting to have an opportunity to express their views, when the meeting was not intended or designed to provide such an opportunity?

3. Has the publics perception of, or opposition to, the meeting subject already been strongly expressed in the area media?

Keep in mind that the purpose of this analysis is on the quality of NRC communications and how to improve them. The purpose does not include how to persuade stakeholders to like the message; they may not like the NRC, the licensee, or the message to be delivered. Our objective is to make our communications to the stakeholders more effective.