|
---|
Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARML1116406212011-06-13013 June 2011 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supplemental Attachment to the Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson ML1115304492011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 12 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304462011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3C in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115303392011-06-0101 June 2011 New and Significant Information from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident in the Context of Future Operation of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML1115303452011-06-0101 June 2011 Declaration of Dr. Gordon R. Thompson in Support of Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Contention and Related Petitions and Motions ML1115304432011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3B in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304452011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 11 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304442011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 3A in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1115304412011-06-0101 June 2011 Exhibit 5 in Support of Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Re Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima ML1113905652011-05-12012 May 2011 Fukushima Fallout Regulatory Loopholes at U.S. Nuclear Plants ML1113905712011-04-28028 April 2011 Transcript of Briefing on the Status of NRC Response to Events in Japan and Briefing on Station Blackout ML1106009342011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000015-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of James V. Ramsdell Jr., Concerning the Impact of Specific Meteorological Conditions on the Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis ML1106009352011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000016-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Rebuttal Testimony of S. Tina Ghosh Concerning Pilgrim Watch'S Application of NUREG-1150 and NUREG-1465 ML1106009322011-02-0202 February 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000014-00-BD01 - NRC Staff Testimony of Nathan E. Bixler and S. Tina Ghosh Concerning the Impact of Alternative Meteorological Models on the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis ML1106008802011-02-0101 February 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000013-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008822011-02-0101 February 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000014-00-BD01 - Rebuttal Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station SAMA Analysis ML1106008782011-01-31031 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000011-00-BD01 - URS-TR-10-0003, Rev. 1, ENT-Exposure Index Calculation - Exposure Index Analysis Using MACCS2 and Calmet: Sensitivity Study Supporting the Pilgrim Station SAMA Analysis. ML1106009382011-01-30030 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000023-00-BD01 - Statement by Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in the Matter of Entergy Corporation, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application ML1106009372011-01-30030 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000022-00-BD01 - Declaration of Bruce A. Egan, Sc.D., Cmm, in Support of Pilgrim Watch'S Response Opposing Entergy'S Initial Statement of Position on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008982011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000016-00-BD01 - NUREG/CR-6853, Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three-Dimensional Model ML1106008972011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000015-00-BD01 - Revisiting Goiania - 1987 Radiological Accident in Goiania, Brazil ML1106009282011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000011-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for Nathan E. Bixler ML1106008962011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000014-00-BD01 - Kamiar Jamali, Use of Risk Measures in Design and Licensing of Future Reactors ML1106009102011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000001-00-BD01 - Applicant'S Environmental Report, Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis. ML1106008792011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000012-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula on Source Term Used in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis ML1106008722011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000006-00-BD01 - Er Attachment E, Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives Analysis ML1106008712011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000005-00-BD01 - LRA Er Section 4.21 ML1106009002011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - PWA000018-00-BD01 - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to State of New York'S Motion for Partial Summary Disposition of NYS Contention 16/16A ML1106009292011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000012-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for S. Tina Ghosh ML1106008662011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - ENT000001-00-BD01 - Testimony of Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula and Dr. Steven R. Hanna on Meteorological Matters Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106009302011-01-0303 January 2011 Official Exhibit - NRC000013-00-BD01 - Statement of Qualifications for James V. Ramsdell, Jr ML1106008692010-12-31031 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000004-00-BD01 - Analysis of Annual Wind Roses and Precipitation within About 50 Miles of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, and Use of Calmet to Calculate the Annual Distribution of Trajectories from the Pilgrim Stati ML1106008672010-12-30030 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000002-00-BD01 - Declaration of Kevin R. O'Kula in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1106008682010-12-22022 December 2010 Official Exhibit - ENT000003-00-BD01 - Declaration of Steven R. Hanna in Support of Entergy'S Pre-filed Testimony on Pilgrim Watch Contention 3 ML1013304352010-05-12012 May 2010 NRC Staff'S Initial Brief in Response to the Board'S Order (Regarding Deadlines for Submission of Parties) ML1106009022009-12-31031 December 2009 Official Exhibit - PWA000019-00-BD01 - What'S in the Black Box Known as Emergency Dose Assessment ML1106008912009-05-31031 May 2009 Official Exhibit - PWA000010-00-BD01 - Jennifer E. Thorp, the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study ML1106009262009-05-31031 May 2009 Official Exhibit - NRC000010-00-BD01 - the Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study NRC-2007-0019, FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking2008-08-0808 August 2008 FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking ML1112203542008-08-0808 August 2008 FRN the Attorney General of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Attorney General of California; Denial of Petitions for Rulemaking ML0810904402008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 11, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.1.13 Water Chemistry Control BWR Program ML0810904752008-04-15015 April 2008 2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 8, License Renewal Application, Appendix B.0.3 ML0810905332008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 14, Amendment No. 176 Excerpt (3/4.5-7 - 3/4.5-8) ML0810902922008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 17, Bptip: NUREG-1891, Rev. 1, X I M32, 3.0.3.2.1, Buried Pipes and Tanks Inspection Program, 3-35 to 3-38 ML0810902462008-04-15015 April 2008 2008/04/15-Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Applicant Exhibit 2, Pilgrim License Renewal Application, Pages from Appendix B ML0811202612008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 23, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.2 Staff'S Review Process ML0810904382008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 9, NUREG-1891 (Sept. 2007, Published Nov. 2007) Excerpt - 3.0.3.2.16 Service Water Integrity Program ML0810905242008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 8, Nureg/Cr 6876, Risk Informed Assessment of Degraded Buried Piping Systems in Nuclear Power Plants; Brookhaven National Laboratory; Us NRC, June 2005. from Sections.. ML0810906152008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Staff Exhibit 28, NRC Region III Report Excerpt - Service Water (SX) System ML0810906162008-04-15015 April 2008 Pilgrim April 2008 Evidentiary Hearing - Intervenor Exhibit 53, 2-Photographs of Corrosion on Pipes at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 2011-06-13
[Table view] |
Text
LIv.J~r\rc I r-- U .-. .-
April 15, 2008 (10:00am) ~dWANo1 5,-t&.
'fi*
O--- Wi.t.ve.or.
Ocwi OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF, JITF.,o XI.M34 BURIED PIPING AND TANKS INSPECTION A lmT IJ Program Description rlawm -- /beW//"
The program includes (a) preventive measures to mitigate corrosion, and (b) periodic inspection to manage the effects of corrosion on the pressure-retaining capacity of buried steel piping and tanks. Gray cast iron, which is included under the definition of steel, is also subject to a loss of material due to selective leaching, which is an aging effect managed under Chapter XI.M33, "Selective Leaching of Materials."
Preventive measures are in accordance with standard industry practice for maintaining external coatings and wrappings. Buried piping and tanks are inspected when they are.excavated during maintenance and when a pipe is dug up and inspected for any reason.
This program is an acceptable option to manage buried piping and tanks, except further evaluation is required for the program element/attributes of detection of aging effects (regarding inspection frequency) and operating experience, Evaluation and Technical Basis
- 1. Scope of Program:The program relies on preventive measures such as coating, wrapping and periodic inspection for loss of material caused by corrosion of the external surface of buried steel piping and tanks. Loss of material in these components, which may be exposed to aggressive soil environment, is caused by general, 1itting, and crevice corrosion, and microbiologically-influenced corrosion (MIC). Periodic inspections are performed when the components are excavated for maintenance or for any other reason.
The scope of the program covers buried components that are within the scope of license renewal for the plant.
- 2. Preventive Actions: In accordance with industry practice, underground piping and tanks are coated during installation with a protective coating system, such as coal tar enamel with a fiberglass wrap and a kraft paper outer wrap, a polyolifin tape coating, or a fusion bonded epoxy coating to protect the piping from contacting the aggressive soil environment.
- 3. ParametersMonitored/inspected:The program monitors parameters such as coating and wrapping integrity that are directly related to corrosion damage of the external surface of buried steel piping and tanks. Coatings and wrappings are inspected by visual techniques. Any evidence of damaged wrapping or coating defects, such as coating perforation, holidays, or other damage, is an indicator of possible corrosion damage to the external surface of piping and tanks.
- 4. Detection of Aging Effects: Inspections performed to confirm that coating and wrapping are intact are an effective method to ensure that corrosion of external surfaces has not occurred and the intended function is maintained. Buried piping and tanks are opportunistically inspected whenever they are excavated during maintenance. When opportunistic, the inspections are performed in areas with the highest likelihood of corrosion problems, and in areas with a history of corrosion problems, within the areas made accessible to support the maintenance activity.
September 2005 Xl M-111 NUREG-1801, Rev, I 7
The applicant's program is to be evaluated for the extended period of operation. It is anticipated that one or more opportunistic inspections may occur within a ten-year period.
Prior to entering the period of extended operation, the applicant is to verify that there is at least one opportunistic or focused inspection is performed within the past ten; years. Upon entering the period of extended operation, the applicant isto perform a focused inspection within ten years, unless an opportunistic inspection occurred within this ten-year period.
Any credited inspection should be performed in areas with the highest likelihood of corrosion problems, and in areas with a history of corrosion problems.
- 5. Monitoring and Trending: Results of previous inspections are used to identify susceptible locations.
- 6. Acceptance Criteria: Any coating and wrapping degradations are reported and evaluated according to site corrective actions procedures.
- 7. Corrective Actions: The site corrective actions program, quality assurance (QA) procedures, site review and approval. process, and administrative controls are implemented in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.The staff finds the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to address the corrective actions, confirmation, process, and administrative controls.
- 8. Confirmation PrDcess: See Item 7, above.
- 9. Administrative Controls: See Item 7, above.
- 10. Operating Experience: Operating experience shows that the program described here is effective in managing corrosion of external surfaces of buried steel piping and tanks.
However, because the inspection frequency isplant-specific and depends on the plant.
operating experience, the applicant's plant-specific operating experience is further evaluated for the extended period of operation.
References 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear.Power Plants, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 2005.
NUREG-1801, Rev. I X1 M-1 12 September 2005