ML080980298
| ML080980298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/2008 |
| From: | Garchow S Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| 50-313/08-301, 50-368/08-301 50-313/08-301, 50-368/08-301 | |
| Download: ML080980298 (26) | |
Text
October 1, 2007 NOTE TO: Tom McKernon FROM:
Tony Gody, Chief Chief Examiner, Operations Branch Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
SUBJECT:
EXAM1 NATION ASS1 G NMENT You have been assigned as Chief of the Arkansas luclear One - Unit 2 examination. The operating test has been scheduled to be completed by February 29, 2008. Thank you for contacting Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 2 facility to finalize the details of the examination.
You are reminded that the RPS/IP system must be maintained to ensure that the examiners and numbers of candidates are accurate. In addition, you are reminded that only qualified examiners are permitted to conduct any part of the examination.
Tony Gody, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
do0 3' os0 Replaces NUREG-1021 Revision 9, ES Forms 201-1 and 501-1
~
CHIEF:
Tom I FACILITY: I Arkansas Nuclear One -
McKernon Jnit 2 I DATE of OPERATING EXAM:
2/25/2008 I
Due Date Description Date Complete I Initials I Notes 8/29/07 Exam Administration Date Confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)
NRC Staff & Facility Contact Assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 10/28/07 1/07 ImCr I 10/28/07 Facility Contact Briefed on Security & Other Req's (C.2.c)
Corporate Notification Letter (ES-201 Att-3) Sent (C.2.d) 10/28/07 1 1/27/07 Reference Material Due (if NRC authored) (C.l.e; C.3.c)
Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)
Outlines Review & NRC Feedback Provided (c.2.h; C.3.e) 12/1 7/07 Draft Exams wIReferences Due (C.l.e,f,g,h; C.3.d)
- Peer Reviewer Completes Review of Exam on ES-401-9 1/26/08 1/26/08
- NRC BC Approves Feedback to Facility (C.2.h; C.3.f) 1/26/08 1 / g o 8
'Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f & h; C.3.g)
Preliminary Applications Due (C.l.I;C.2.g; ES-202) 1 131 108 Preliminary Applications Reviewed (C.1.I;C.2.g)
Final Applications Due (C.l.I;C.2.i;ES-202)
On-Site Preparatory Week to Validate Operating Exam 2/1 1/08 On-Site Audit (10%) of License App's (ES-202 C.2.e)
Final Appl. OKed & Waiver Letters Sent (ES-204; C.2.e) 2/1 8/08 2/18/08 NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h) 2/1 8/08 Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-4) and List of Applicants (ES-201-4) Prepared (C.2.i)
Proctor Rules Review w/Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k) 2/18/08 2/18/08 Exam Material to Exam Team (C.3.i) 2/25/08 Administer Operating Exam On-Site Facility Graded Exam & Comments Received 3/8/08 311 1/08 NRC Written Exam Grading Completed 311 1108 Examiners Document Exam Grades on ES Forms 3/21/08 NRC Chief Examiner Grading Review Completed 3/22/08 NRC BC Review Completed 3/26/08 LicenseIDenials Signed & Report Issued 3/26/08 RPSIIP Number of Examinees Updated 6 produced by Chief Examiner L - l / l I o y 2276-411 0108 411 7/08 Examination Report Issued Package Closed Out 411 7/08 Chief QA of ADAMS and SlSP review complete
' Indicates the due dates are more conservative than the ES-201-1 requires.
/
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Date of Examination: 02/22 -02129 2008 Item
- 1.
W R
I T
T E
N -
- 2.
S I
M U
L A
T 0
R
- 3.
W
/
T
- 4.
e E
N E
R A
L Task Description
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
- b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- c.
- d.
- a.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
- c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- a.
- b.
- c.
- a.
- b.
- c.
- d.
Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
- e.
- f.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a Initials
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:
- Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-201, Page 25 of 27
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Date of Exam: 02/22/2008 Exam Level: RO SRO [XI were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exam, consult the NRR OL program ofice).
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
- the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or X the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
~~
other (explain)
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Date of Examination: 2/25-2/29 2008 Operating Test Number: 2008-1
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA nitiab b* - -
C#
a
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
- b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
C.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a).
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Date
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.
ES-301, Page 24 of 27
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Scenario Numbers: I
/ 2 / 3 Operating Test Number: 2008-1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a
b*
C#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
- 3.
Each event description consists of e
e 0
0 0
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible orecedina incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- 6.
- 7.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
- 8.
- 9.
I O.
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form alona with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
- 13.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario: See Section D.5.d)
I Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8)
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4)
- 4.
Major transients (1-2)
- 5.
EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2)
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3)
ES-301, Page 25 of 27
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 NA NA NA Facility: ANO-2 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 NA NA NA 1
2 CREW POSITION I
CREW POSITION NOR NA
--+
I/C NA MAJ I NA 3
0 5
0 6
NA I,1 I
NA I NA 2
5 2
0 1
1 4
2 0
Instrtictions:
1, Circle the applicant level antl enter the operating test iiumber and Form ES-D-I eveiit nuiiibeis Tor each eveiit type: TS are not applicable Tor RO applicants. lZOs iiitist seive 111 both the "at-the-conliols (ATC)"
and "balaiice-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do oiie scenario, iiicluding at least two insti timent or com~ioiient (1/C) iiialliinctions and one iiiajor transient, in the ATC posit ion.
Rcactivity manipulations may be conducted uiider noiiiial or controlled abnoimal conditions (iefer to Section D.5.d) but iiitist be signilicant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (4 ) Reactivity antl iioriiial evolutions may be rcplaced with additional insti ument or componeiit ~iialfunctions on ;I 1-Tor-I basis.
Whenever practical, both insti tuiient aiicl coiiiponcnt malliinctions should be iiicluded; oiily those that require vcrilinble actions that piovicle insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum iequirements specified Ibr the applicant's license level in the right-hand columiis.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
E§-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 1
Date of Exam:02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 1
/I Facility: ANO-2 1
rn 2
-I Y
-0 (D
(D CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 00 4:
v)
A 0
NA I
NA NA RX 0
NA NA
~
NA NOR NA 1
3,7,9 1-;
5 I
4 I/C NA NA 8,9 NA NA MAJ 6
NA NA NA NA TS NA I
- 1.
Circle tlie applicant level and cnter tlie operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both tlie ai-the-controls (AFC) and balance-of-plaiit (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least iwo instrument or componcnl (K) malfunctions and oiie iiiajor transient. in tlie AlC positioii.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted tinder normal or controlled abnormal conditioiis (le fer to Scction D.5.d) but mils1 be signilicaiit per Section C.2.a or Appciidix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaccd with additional iristruiiient or compoiient malftlnctions on a I-for-I basis.
Wlieiiever practical, both instrument and compoiiciil malfunctions SI~OLIILI be incluclecl; only those that require veriliable actions that piovide insight to tlie applicants coiiipetence count toward tlie iiiiiiimtiiii requirements specifed for tlie applicants license level in tlie right-hand coltuiiiis.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
5. GodolLod
Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301 11 Facility: ANO-2 RX NOR I/C MAJ TS Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 1
CREW POSITION I
I
-m NA 2
CREW POSITION NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0
6 NA I
2 5
2 0 -
1 1
4 2
0 I.
Circle the applicant level and enter the opelaling test ntiinber and Foriii ES-D-I event nuiiibeis for each evcnl type; TS are iiot applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve iii both the at-the-coiitiols (ATC) and balance-01-plaiit (BOP). positions: Instant SROs iiiust do one scenario, including at least two instiuinent or component (I/C) iiialfiinctions and oiic iiiajor transient, in the ATC posilioii.
Reactivity inanipulations inay be conducted tinder normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but mtist be significant per Section C.2.a of Appe~iclix D. (.L) Reactivity ant1 normil evolutions may be ieplacecl with additional instiument or component iiialliinctions on a I-for-I basis.
Whenever practical, both instrumcnt and component malliiiictioiis should bc included; only those that require verifiable actions that piovide insight to the applicaiits co~iipetence count to\\vnrd the minimum reqtiiiements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael BI anc hard NRC Reviewer:
- 5. G,voL$
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: ANO-2 a
Date of Exam:02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 2
1 CREW POSITION CREW POSITION cn 7-J 0
RX 1
1 1
NA NA NA I
NA I 1
NOR 1
4 8,9 I/C 5
4 NA 2
0 2
MAJ TS NA 0
- 1.
Ciicle tlie applicant level and enter the operating test ntimber and Form ES-D-1 event numbers lbr cacli event type; TS ate not applicable for I C 0 applicants. ROs must serve in both tlie "at-the-controls (ATC)"
antl "balance-ol~plant (BOP)" positions: Instant SROs must do one scenario. inclucling at least two instrument or component (I/C) malliinctions and one ma-jor transient. in tlie ATC position.
Reactivity maiiipuldtions may be coiiducted under iioniial or controlled nbnoriiial conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) bul must be significant per Seclioii C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity antl iioniial evolutions m~iy be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctious on n 1-Cor-1 basis.
Whenever praciical. both instrument and component iiialfinictions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that providc insight 10 tlie applicant's competence count to\\vard the miniiiium reqtiiiements specified I'or tlie applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
- s. GOLrG\\pyod
E§-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-304 -5 NA
'acility: ANO-2 2,3,7 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 2
1 is z z
c z
'3 m
-I Y
U m
- 2.
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION m
B -
NA NA NA NA -
NA m
0 si yi RX NA NA
~
0 1
~
2 1
NOR 0
NA I
1.5 1
70 0
Al I/C 5
4 NA I
6 2
2 MAJ TS
---I-- -
NA 1 NA NA NA I
NA 0
0 I I Instructions:
1.
Ciicle the applicant lcvel and enter the operating test iitiiiiber and Form ES-D-I ekent numbers Ibr each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
nnd "balaiice-ot'plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario. including at least hvo instrument or coiiipoiient (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity niaiiipulatioiis may be conducted under norinal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but iiiusl be signilicant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) lieactivity and norinal evoliiiions may be ieplaced with Lidtlitional instruiiient or coiiipoiieiit malfuiictions 011 a 1 -for-I basis.
Whcnever practical, both instrument and coiiiponcnt malliinctions should bc included; only those that rcquire veiilinblc actions that provide insight to the applicant's coiiipetence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the light-hand columns.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: ANO-2 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 -
5 z z
c H
rn ID 2.
-i Y
-0 ID 1
2 CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 2
0 NA NA RX 1
1 NA NOR 1
1 1
9 4
IIC MAJ NA NA NA 6
2 2
TS 4 5 7 3
2 Instructions:
I.
Circle tlie applicant level and enter tlie operatiiig test iiumber and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; 1's ale not applicable I'or RO applicants. ROs intist scrve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-ol'plant (BOP)" positioi instrument or component ( 1 K ) iiid liui Reactivity manipulations niay be conducted tinder iiornial or controllecl abnoriiial conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a ol' Appendix D. ("1 Reactivity and noriiial evolutions may be replacccl id11 additional instrument or component molfuiictions on a I-for-L basis.
Wlicnever practical, both instrument and componcnt malftinctioiis should be iiicludcd: only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count to\\vartl the iiiiiiiiiitiiii requirciiients specified I'or the applicant's liceiisc level in the right-hand columns.
Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least l\\vo oils and one major transient, in tlie ATC position.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
SI Garc/Ld
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: ANO-2 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 1
2 CREW POSITION CREW POSITION m
0
-u -
NA RX NA NA NA NA
~
NA 0
NA NA NA NA NOR 1
1 NA NA NA NA I/C NA 6
2 NA
~
NA NA NA NA NA 1
MAJ TS NA 6
4,5,7 NA 2
Instructions:
- 1.
Circle the applicant level and enter tlie operating test number and Foriii ES-D-I event nuiiibers For each event type; TS are not applicable Tor RO applicants. ROs mist serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) amd balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario. including at least two instrument 01 componcnt (IiC) iiinlliinctioiis and one mqjor transicnt, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under iioriiial or controlled abiioriiial conditions (refix to Section D.5.d) but iiiiist be significant per Section C.2.a of Appeiidix D. ( K, Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additioiial instrument or cowpoiieiit iiialfuiictions on a 1 -for-1 basis.
- 2.
- 3.
Whenever practical. both instrument and component maltiinctioiis sliotild be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide iiisight to the applicants competence count toward tlie iiiinimuiii requirements specilied Ibr the applicants liconse level in the right-hand columns.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
- acility: ANO-2 Date of Exam: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No: 1 cn A
0 ir 10 RX NOR I/C MAJ TS 1
CREW POSITION NA NA NA NA NA 3
0 NA NA NA NA NA W
0
-0 NA NA
~
NA NA NA C
I NA 1
6 3,5,7 NA NA Instructions:
- 1.
Circle tlie applicant level and entei the operating test nunibci and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event typc: TS ale not applicable for RO applicaiits. ROs must serve in both the at-the-contiols (ATC) and balaiice-of-plait (BOP) positioiis: Instant SROs iiitist do one scenario. including at least two instrument or coniponcnt (I/C) malfunctions and one iiiajor transient, in h e ATC position.
Reactivity maniptilations may be conducted iinder normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but intis1 be significant per Seclion C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity ant1 iiornial evolutions may be replaced with iidclitioiial instrument oi component maltiinctions on a I-lor-1 basis.
Whenever prac~ical, both instrument and component malhinctions slioiild bc included: only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants coniiietence count toward tlie iiiininitini requirements specilied Lor tlic applicants license level in the light-hand columns.
- 2.
- 3.
Author:
Michael BI anc hard NRC Reviewer:
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Interpret / Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
Date of Examination: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS Facility: ANO-2 Competencies RO-2,4 SCENARIO l
l 2
3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 4
NA NA NA NA NA NA (1 1 (2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
Instrnctions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaliiate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS Competencies Interpret / Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
RO-1, 3, 5 SCENARIO Notes:
(1)
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event niimbers tlmf will allow the exainiiiers to evaluate every applicable coinpeteiicy for every applicant.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
S - Gar-oL~
ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies Facility: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 SRO-I1 Interpret / Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (I)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 3,5,6,7,9 NA NA 2,3,4,5,6,7 5 6 NA NA N/A 3,5,6,7,9 NA NA 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 3,5,6,7,9 NA NA 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 NA NA 4,5,7 NA NA Instriicfions:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event nun7bers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
s G&krtL4?Ls/
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facilitv: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 02/25/2008 Operating Test No.: I Competencies Interpret I Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
APPLICANTS SRO - U1 Notes:
(1)
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
Instriic tioiis:
Circle the applicant's license'type and enter one or more event niimbers that will allow the examiners to evalirate every applicable competency for eveiy applicant.
Author:
Michael B Ian chard NRC Reviewer:
s* G4rc.h.QJ
ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: ANO-2 Date of Examination: 07/17/2006 Operating Test No.: 1 Competencies Interpret / Diagnose ll Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (I)
Operate Control t Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
APPLICANTS SRO - U2 SCENARIO 1
2 I
NA I
2,3,5,6,7,8 3
NA NA NA NA NA NA 4
NA NA NA NA NA NA (1)
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
Instriictions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event limbers that will allow the examiners to evaliiate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
Michael Blanchard NRC Reviewer:
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: AN0 Unit 2 Date of Exam: 02/22/2008 Exam Level: RO SRO I
Initials Item Description a
- 1.
- 2.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, 5 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature
- a. Author I
.-i Date
{&?2
- b. Facility Reviewerr) a-27-b~
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
3 l ~ f l f
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5
~
E 0
P m
E m
X E
w e n
r
~
E 0
m E
CI E
d w
U fn 0
- 0.
ni a,
ba cd PI n
3 0
?I w
~
S O
m C
.I-E d
Y
.id u) 0 L
ni ci W
I-
i o i o i
i z
z W
W I
I a
a W
w 3-0 0
I I
0 0
W W
6 6
(3 (3
r T-7.- 0 0
00 W
0 0
0 0
N N
m m
00 00 (D
W 0
0 0
0 0
0 In 0
In 0
m m
a, a,
6 6
In hi U
0 u
Q Y) m c
n d
c 0
En 2
0 a,
6 L
m a,
0 3
Z ln m
fn c
m 2
L e -
m c
P 0
s? Y 0
3 0
K cr) 2:
I" Z v )
3 -
L O 3
Z 0
W 0
0 2
P
-r-0 L -
m c
P 0
0 K Y 0
3 0
0 W
a, 6
L m
a, 0
3 Z
- 0) m fn c
m 5
Q e L
m 0
t-c 0
s? Y P.l 3 2 (0
W W
0 0
N 0
2 P
L -
m 0
t-c 0
0 K Y N
3 0
K v) 0 a,..
6 L
m a,
0 3
Z In m
fn m
5 4
L Y-0 m -
c 0
I s? Y 0
3 0
K (I)
-I a W
0 0
00 0
0 Eo 0
0 N
-?
0 s
0 si I
0
M hi U
0 0
Q II) m c
a C
0 m
B W
d c
0 m
'2 d
L -
m 0
t-4-4 0
0 E
fl:
N 13 v) 2 T- -
0 E
v)