ML080640763
| ML080640763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/2008 |
| From: | Burton N - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Lathrop K, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, RAS 15120 | |
| Download: ML080640763 (1) | |
Text
RAs 45-c)
Nancy Burton 147 Cross Highway Redding Ridge CT 06876 Tel. 203-938-3952/NancvBurtonCTcaol.com DOCKETED USNRC February 22, 2008 (2:30pm)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF February 22, 2008 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop - T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001 Dr. Kaye Lathrop Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 190 Cedar Lane East Ridgway CO 81432 Re: In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3)/Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR
Dear Administrative Judges:
This letter responds on behalf of Connecticut Residents Opposed to Relicensing of Indian Point ("CRORIP") and myself to the february 19, 2008 letter of Entergy's counsel to the Licensing Board regarding upcoming oral argument.
We generally adopt the comments,of-petitionersState of-:New Yofknd,R verkeper Inc. submitted in separate letter to the Licensing Board o
nd-iverke--er, With specific regard to CRORIP and myself as petitioners, we reserve the right to present oral argument on standing to address any points and reservations raised by Entergy and NRC staff in their answers to CRORIP's petition. With regard to CRORIP's sole proposed contention - concerning the issue of human health - we do not object to having CRORIP's oral argument scheduled.with, oral argument of other petitioners who have presentedrelated contentions. Indeed, we believe sched.iling,.s uch,argumenlts..iin -
sequence would best facilitate the proceedings.
cc: Service List.,
cer
". AN ncy u rýt cn PýLmr sec f - c)")--