|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML22119A0112021-12-31031 December 2021
Comment (42) of Sierra Club, Lower Hudson Group on Holtec'S Decommissioning Plan for Indian Point
ML21299A1592021-10-26026 October 2021
Comment (35) of Theresa Knickerbocker on Comments on NRC Public Meeting on the Holtec PSDAR
ML21295A2342021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (28) of Susan Van Dolsen on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A0302021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (25) of Pete Harckham on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1522021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (4) of Courtney M. Williams on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A7252021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (31) of Courtney M. Williams on Behalf of Safe Energy Rights Group on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A4032021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (29) of Mary Finneran Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A7242021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (30) of Dan Galinko on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1692021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (39) of Bonnie Webber on Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1622021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (36) of Catherine Skopic on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1672021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (37) of Ellen Weininger on Behalf of Grassroots Environmental Educational on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1572021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (34) of Michel Lee on Docket Id NRC-2021-0125. Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR)
ML21295A7262021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (32) of Doug Couchon on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1682021-10-22022 October 2021
Comment (38) of Richard Webster on Behalf of Riverkeeper, Inc., on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21294A3752021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (24) of Jacquelyn Drechsler and Jocelyn Decrescenzo on Indian Point Regarding the Casks and Canisters for Containment of Radioactive Nuclear Waste
ML21294A0762021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (21) of J. Mullee of Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21294A3032021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (23) of Pete Harckham on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21299A1562021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (33) of Alyse Peterson on Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A2322021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (27) of Jeff Schumann on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21295A0322021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (26) of Sandy Galef on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML22119A0102021-10-21021 October 2021
Comment (41) of Laura Burkhardt on Decommissioning of Indian Point
ML21293A2082021-10-20020 October 2021
Comment (20) of Nivo Rovedo on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21293A2072021-10-20020 October 2021
Comment (19) of Patrick Hewes on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21293A2052021-10-19019 October 2021
Comment (18) of Patrick Hewes on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21293A1162021-10-17017 October 2021
Comment (3) of T. Reidsr on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21293A2002021-10-15015 October 2021
Comment (17) of Benjamin Boykin, Alfreda A. Williams Et. Al. on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21286A7622021-10-10010 October 2021
Comment (16) of Daria Gregg on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A5562021-10-0505 October 2021
Comment (11) of John Spring on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21278A8672021-10-0505 October 2021
Comment (15) of Marsha Upton on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A5582021-10-0101 October 2021
Comment (12) of Kale Roberts on Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A5632021-09-22022 September 2021
Comment (14) of Marilyn Mitchell on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A5592021-09-12012 September 2021
Comment (13) of Amy Mott on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Units 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A5552021-09-0505 September 2021
Comment (10) of Madeleine Glick on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21243A4392021-08-23023 August 2021
Comment (2) of J. M. Singletary on Behalf of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning
ML21218A0922021-08-0505 August 2021
Comment (9) of Catherine Skopic on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21218A0912021-08-0404 August 2021
Comment (8) of Dale Saltzman on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3;Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21215A3282021-08-0101 August 2021
Comment (7) of Marie Inserra on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21211A0772021-07-29029 July 2021
Comment (7) of Stephen Kent on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21215A3272021-07-29029 July 2021
Comment (6) of Stephen Kent on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21210A1462021-07-28028 July 2021
Comment (06) of Linda D. Puglisi on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21215A3302021-07-28028 July 2021
Comment (1) of Linda D. Puglisi on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21204A1332021-07-23023 July 2021
Comment (3) of Buddy Buchanan on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21204A1352021-07-23023 July 2021
Comment (5) of Buddy Buchanan on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21204A1342021-07-23023 July 2021
Comment (4) of Buddy Buchanan on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21204A1312021-03-0101 March 2021
Comment (1) of Herschel Specter on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML19108A3062019-04-18018 April 2019
Comment (23) of Joan Vogt on Agency Activities in Response to a Portion of the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act
ML18192B9652018-07-0808 July 2018
Comment (108) of Jacuelyn Drechsler Opposing Draft Letter to the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding the Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies
ML17188A3332017-07-0707 July 2017
Public Comments on Indian Point License Renewal L11 - Comment of Andrew Raddant on Behalf of Us Department of Interior
ML17188A3392017-07-0707 July 2017
Public Comments on Indian Point License Renewal L14 - Comment of Susan Shapiro on Behalf of Phase
ML17188A3382017-07-0707 July 2017
Public Comments on Indian Point License Renewal L13 - Comment of John Sipos
2021-09-05
[Table view] |
Text
From: "michel" <ciecplee@verizon.net>
To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/16/2007 12:16:06 PM
Subject:
reSubmission of Comments on the Scope of the Environmental Review of Indian Point (Michel Lee- CIECP)
Dear Chief,
Kindly exchange this submission for the one originally transmitted on October 12th. This version has corrected paragraph numbering and contact information.
Thank you.
Subject:
Submission of Comments on the Scope of the Environmental Review of Indian Point (Michel Lee - CIECP)
October 11, 2007 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Chief,
It is respectfully submitted that the special circumstances of Indian Point
- i.e., its siting in a uniquely congested demographic area, 24 miles north of New York City , within 50 miles of over 20 million people, and its status as an identified and widely recognized terrorist target - warrants a particularly stringent and comprehensive analysis of all environmental factors, including:
(1) The environmental consequences of a terrorist attack that leads to a major and potentially rapid radiation release; (2) The prognosticated effects and conditions of global warming; (3) The potential health and environmental consequences of using the Hudson River as a source of public drinking water (as per the plan of Rockland County);
(4) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of dumping radionuclides into the Hudson River, combined with an analysis of the synergistic interaction of such radionuclides with other known Hudson River pollutants like PCBs, endocrine disruptors (including dioxins) and mercury; (5) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of additional releases of radiation and other chemical toxins into the atmosphere, combined with an analysis of the synergistic interaction of such elements with other known pollutants such as mercury; (6) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of additional releases of radiation and other chemical toxins released by Indian Point into the environment (especially toxic metals like cadmium) upon populations most susceptible to radiation and toxic chemicals, such as
women, adolescents, children, babies, breast-fed infants and the embryo/fetus.
(7) All reasonable energy alternatives, especially the renewable clean forms of energy that are widely viewed as the energy technologies of the "future" as well as efficiency technologies and demand-side options; (8) Environmental justice, especially the environmental and health impacts on poor communities and communities of color in the event of a large radiation release incident (e.g., the continued impact on those communities in New Orleans, long after Katrina) as well as the environmental impacts of 20 additional years of uranium mining and nuclear fuel processing and disposition upon Native American populations, people of color, and poor communities; (9) The long-term tax and economic effects of placing a term high level nuclear waste dump on the banks of the Hudson River for an indefinite, and potentially centuries-long, duration.
(10) The continued explosive population growth in the region (calculated using the same percentage of growth that has occurred over the past 20),
which will exponentially increase the potential damage calculation for virtually every area of concern.
In addition, I support consideration of the broad areas requested by members of the public and public interest groups during the September 19, 2007 public EIS meeting, including:
- Historic or Cultural Resources
- Taxes, Community Development
- Human Health Sincerely, Michel Lee, Esq.
Chairman Council on Intelligent Energy
& Conservation Policy 265 Madison Rd Scarsdale, New York 10583 (914) 420-5624 ciecplee@verizon.net
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 308 Mail Envelope Properties (47309666.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000000.1.145062.1)
Subject:
reSubmission of Comments on the Scope of the Environmental Review of Indian Point (Michel Lee- CIECP)
Creation Date: 10/16/2007 12:16:06 PM From: "michel" <ciecplee@verizon.net>
Created By: ciecplee@verizon.net Recipients
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4149 10/16/2007 12:16:06 PM TEXT.htm 19139 11/6/2007 4:29:26 PM Mime.822 26325 11/6/2007 4:29:26 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard
Page 1 of 2
Dear Chief,
Kindly exchange this submission for the one originally transmitted on October 12th. This version has corrected paragraph numbering and contact information.
Thank you.
Subject:
Submission of Comments on the Scope of the Environmental Review of Indian Point (Michel Lee - CIECP)
October 11, 2007 Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Chief,
It is respectfully submitted that the special circumstances of Indian Point - i.e., its siting in a uniquely congested demographic area, 24 miles north of New York City , within 50 miles of over 20 million people, and its status as an identified and widely recognized terrorist target - warrants a particularly stringent and comprehensive analysis of all environmental factors, including:
(1) The environmental consequences of a terrorist attack that leads to a major and potentially rapid radiation release; (2) The prognosticated effects and conditions of global warming; (3) The potential health and environmental consequences of using the Hudson River as a source of public drinking water (as per the plan of Rockland County);
(4) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of dumping radionuclides into the Hudson River, combined with an analysis of the synergistic interaction of such radionuclides with other known Hudson River pollutants like PCBs, endocrine disruptors (including dioxins) and mercury; (5) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of additional releases of radiation and other chemical toxins into the atmosphere, combined with an analysis of the synergistic interaction of such elements with other known pollutants such as mercury; (6) The potential health and environmental consequences of 20 additional years of additional releases of radiation and other chemical toxins released by Indian Point into the environment (especially toxic metals like cadmium) upon populations most susceptible to radiation and toxic chemicals, such as women, adolescents, children, babies, breast-fed infants and the embryo/fetus.
(7) All reasonable energy alternatives, especially the renewable clean forms of energy that are widely viewed as the energy technologies of the future as well as efficiency technologies and demand-side options; (8) Environmental justice, especially the environmental and health impacts on poor communities and communities of color in the event of a large radiation release incident (e.g., the continued impact on those communities in New Orleans, long after Katrina) as well as the environmental impacts of 20 additional years of uranium mining and nuclear fuel processing and disposition upon Native American populations, people of color, and poor communities; (9) The long-term tax and economic effects of placing a term high level nuclear waste dump on the banks of the Hudson River for an indefinite, and potentially centuries-long, duration.
file://C:\EMailCapture\IndianPointLRScoping\308\attch1.htm 11/6/2007
Page 2 of 2 (10) The continued explosive population growth in the region (calculated using the same percentage of growth that has occurred over the past 20), which will exponentially increase the potential damage calculation for virtually every area of concern.
In addition, I support consideration of the broad areas requested by members of the public and public interest groups during the September 19, 2007 public EIS meeting, including:
z Wildlife and Fish z Water and Air Resources z Historic or Cultural Resources z Taxes, Community Development z Environmental Justice z Land Use z Human Health Sincerely, Michel Lee, Esq.
Chairman Council on Intelligent Energy
& Conservation Policy 265 Madison Rd Scarsdale, New York 10583 (914) 420-5624 ciecplee@verizon.net file://C:\EMailCapture\IndianPointLRScoping\308\attch1.htm 11/6/2007
