ML072640022

License Renewal ACRS Full Committee Brief of September 6, 2007

ML072640022
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	09/06/2007
From:	Perry Buckberg Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML072640022 (29)

Text

Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Safety Evaluation Report Staff Presentation to the ACRS Perry Buckberg Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation September 6, 2007.V: 9 Introduction e Overview" Section* License" Section 2: Scoping and Screen ing Review Renewal Inspections 3: Aging Management Review Results*Section 4: Time-Limited Aging (TLAAs)Analyses 2 It Overview* LRA Submitted by Letter, January° GE BWR3 -MARK 1 Containment 27, 2006 e 2028 MWth, 690 MWe* Op License DPR-35 Expires June 8, 2012* Located in Plymouth, MA 3 Overview" SER Issued June 28, 2007 o SSER to be Issued September, 2007" Open Items (4) Have Been Closed" Four (4) License Conditions" 92 RAIs Issued, 329 Audit Questions* =82% Consistent With GALL Report, Revision 1 4 I Review Highlights

° AMP GALL Audit-May 22, 2006" Scoping and Screening Methodology

-June 6 -June 9, 2006" AMR GALL Audit-June 19, 2006" AMP/AMR Status Briefing-July 17 -19, 2006 Audit 0 Regional Inspections

-September 18 -22, 2006-October 2 -6, 2006-December 6 -7, 2006 5 Section 2: Scoping and Screening Review Section 2.1 -Scoping and Screening Methodology

• On-site Audit -June 6 -June 9, 2006* Pilgrim included all system components in scope if any components were (a)2 -exceptions stated Section 2.3* 4 Additional Components Brought Into Scope Section 2.2, 2.4, 2.5* No Omissions 6 Section 2: Scoping and Screening Review Section 2.3-Mechanica I Systems* Open Item 2.3.3.6: Security Diesel-LRA Did not Include System Drawings-Referred to Regional Inspector to Determine System Components in Scope Staff Considered the 3/9/2007 Inspector Input Adequate to Close the Open Item 7 Section 2: Scoping and Screening Summary* The Applicant's Scoping Methodology Meets The Requirements Of 10 CFR Part 54.4* Scoping And Screening Results, As Amended, Included All SSCs Within The Scope Of License Renewal And Subject To AMR 8 License Renewal Inspections Glenn Meyer Region I v Scoping and Screening 0 54.4(a)(2)

-Non-safety SSCs Whose Failure Could Impact Safety SSCs" Spatial and Structural Interactions" LRA Drawings and Procedures Reviewed" Plant Walkdowns Performed 10 Scoping and Screening Conclusions" Spatial Interaction

-Acceptable" Structural Interaction

-Corrected" Scoping and Screening Acceptable for License Renewal 11 Aging Management e* ~ R~G&~0 I. 0 0 0* Reviewed* Reviewed 26 AMP Prog rams Programs, Evaluations, and Records" Program Procedures" Operational Experience Information

• Prior Pilgrim Issues Performed Plant Walk Downs* Interviewed Cognizant Personnel 12

• p~REG .Inspection A Conclusions

• Scoping and Aging Management Programs Support Conclusion That Aging Effects will be Managed* Drywell Shell Monitoring 13 ,Ib Current Performance" Licensee Response Column (Column I) of the NRC's Action Matrix -Green Pis and Findings" No Cross-cutting Issues" Reactor Oversight Process Baseline Inspections 14 Performance Indicators Radiation Safeguards Safety Occupational Public Physical Radiation Radiation Protection Safety Safety (NOT PUBLIC)Performance Indicators ISNor1/2l m. $tP E rniiengolyAC

P4A' yse h'0F s*rVIP gjENjT.Sionw Sytem WaleT'IS7t

, Jactor, Coolantl Dr ý ill/Eecs syste Io-Micgali.R Dr4ll -15 40 Inspection Findings 2Q12007 1MG findings~'

$is qluarA ilqaf 2QQ00O7 e- r, tis quarterj [u l 4QW2006 iisqut&Most Significant Inspection Findings din ~ i$j findings E,~i q rer I i nN findings t hef tiqureris Afisce/Ianeous findings 16 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Aging Management Review Time Limited Aging Analysis Open Items Fire Protection Program -(B.1.13.1)

Open Item 3.0.3.2.10:

-Applicant did not Adequately Address how to Manage the Aging Effects of Inaccessible Seals.-Applicant Stated (ACRS) and Documented (June 2007) That There are Actually No Inaccessible Seals at PNPS 18 Co ntainment I nservice Inspection Program (B.1.16.1 e Orpen Item 3.0.3.3.2:

Regional Inspection Documented:

• Inoperative Bellows Rupture Drain Flow Switch e Drain Monitoring Inconclusive

& Undocumented e Water on Torus Room Floor 19 Containment Inservice Inspection Program (B.1.16.1 9 Ooen Item 3.0.3.3.2:

-Replace Switches Now and in 15 years-Identified Non-Aggressive Groundwater as Source of Water on Torus Room Floor e Tested November 2006 and June 2006-Provided Documentation of Drain Monitoring i Committed to Obtain Drywell UT Data 20 Containment Inservice REG Inspection Program (B.1.16.1)'.

Open Item 3.0.3.3.2:

-Torus Structure" Provided Evaluation of Effect on Torus Basemat* Commitments to Evaluate Groundwater/Torus Water i Commitment to Inspect Condition of Torus Hold Down Bolts and Grout 21 Section 4.2: Reactor Vessel Z"PA°Q Neutron Embrittlement 0'.Six TLAAs Affected by Neutron Fluence-Reactor Vessel Fluence-Pressure-Temperature Limits-Upper Shelf Energy-Adjusted Reference Temperature

-Circumferential Weld Inspection Relief-Axial Weld Failure Probability 22 Section 4.2: Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement

• Open Item 4.2-Pilgrim -The First BWR-3 to Use RAMA Methodology to Calculate'Neutron Fluence-Dosimetry Data was not Available with Which to Benchmark the RAMA Calculated Results-Result -Fluence Calculation Not Acceptable Per Reg Guide 1.190 23 V Section 4.2: Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement 0 Open Item 4.2-Applicant's Back Calculation of Limiting Fluence Values Considered Acceptable by the Staff-TLAA Identified Which Established the Limiting Fluence Value* Axial Welds @ RV Inner Surface -3.37 x 1018 n/cm2 (E > 1.0 MeV)24 REG Section 4.2: Reactor Vessel A0 Neutron Embrittlement Open Item 4.2 License Condition 4.2.6: On or before June 8, 2010, the applicant (Entergy) will submit to the NRC correctly benchmarked RV neutron fluence calculations, consistent with RG 1.190, that will confirm that the neutron fluence for the lower intermediate shell axial welds, at the inner surface of the RV, will not reach the limiting value of 3.37 x 1018 n/cm2 (E > 1.0 MeV) by the end of the period of extended operation (54 EFPY).25 Section 4.2: Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement

° Open Item 4.2-Commitment 47: Submit to the NRC An Action Plan for Benchmarking the Reactor Pressure Vessel Fluence Evaluation.

-Entergy Plan Submitted August 23, 2007.26 Section 4.3: Metal Fatigue Reactor Water Environment

-Removed Exception to Fatigue Monitoring Program regarding Environmentally Assisted Fatigue.-Combined FMP and EAF -FMP is Now Consistent with GALL.27'0'. .

Conclusions

• On the basis of its review of the LRA, with the closing of Open Items 2.3.3.6, 3.0.3.2.10, 3.0.3.3.2 and 4.2, the staff determines that the requirements of 10 CFR 54.29(a) have been met.28 Questions