ML072410440
| ML072410440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/2007 |
| From: | Kuo P NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR |
| To: | Shapiro S Rockland Friends United for Safe Energy (FUSE) |
| Pham B, NRR/DLR/REBB, 415-8450 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML072410399 | List: |
| References | |
| LTR-07-0458 | |
| Download: ML072410440 (6) | |
Text
August 28, 2007 Ms. Susan Shapiro, Esq.
FUSE 21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, New York 10977
Dear Ms. Shapiro:
I am responding to your letter dated June 27, 2007, regarding the license renewal application (LRA) for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, submitted by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. on April 23, 2007. In your letter, you provided a list of Complaints/Contentions/Allegations Regarding Indian Points Current Flawed and Failing Operation, and requested that ALL the above iterated and all other problems that affect the safe operation of IP MUST BE fully investigated and repaired in order to maintain intended function, and bring Indian Point into FULL COMPLIANCE with the 10 CFR [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations] rules and regulations, as well as its original DB [design basis] prior to the NRC accepting the licensee's license renewal application, or being granted a new superceding license.
By letter dated July 25, 2007, the NRC staff accepted the LRA for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 for docketing and review. This acceptance does not constitute a determination that a renewed license should be issued, and does not preclude the staff from submitting such requests for additional information as the staff may determine are appropriate or necessary, as its review proceeds. As stated in the notice of acceptance for docketing and opportunity for hearing published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (72 FR 42134), any contention filed as part of a request for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene, with respect to license renewal, must be filed in accordance with the Commissions Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2.
With respect to the complaints brought forth in your letter, the NRC staff will further consider these issues, to the extent that they are relevant to license renewal, during the course of its review of the LRA. In addition, any concern brought forth in your letter that may affect current safe operation of the plant has been, or will be, considered in the appropriate process pertaining to the current operating license.
Thank you for your interest in the license renewal process at Indian Point.
Sincerely,
/RA/
P. T. Kuo, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page
August 28, 2007 Ms. Susan Shapiro, Esq.
FUSE 21 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, New York 10977
Dear Ms. Shapiro:
I am responding to your letter dated June 27, 2007, regarding the license renewal application (LRA) for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, submitted by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. on April 23, 2007. In your letter, you provided a list of Complaints/Contentions/Allegations Regarding Indian Points Current Flawed and Failing Operation, and requested that ALL the above iterated and all other problems that affect the safe operation of IP MUST BE fully investigated and repaired in order to maintain intended function, and bring Indian Point into FULL COMPLIANCE with the 10 CFR [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations] rules and regulations, as well as its original DB [design basis] prior to the NRC accepting the licensee's license renewal application, or being granted a new superceding license.
By letter dated July 25, 2007, the NRC staff accepted the LRA for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 for docketing and review. This acceptance does not constitute a determination that a renewed license should be issued, and does not preclude the staff from submitting such requests for additional information as the staff may determine are appropriate or necessary, as its review proceeds. As stated in the notice of acceptance for docketing and opportunity for hearing published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2007 (72 FR 42134), any contention filed as part of a request for a hearing or petitions for leave to intervene, with respect to license renewal, must be filed in accordance with the Commissions Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2.
With respect to the complaints brought forth in your letter, the NRC staff will further consider these issues, to the extent that they are relevant to license renewal, during the course of its review of the LRA. In addition, any concern brought forth in your letter that may affect current safe operation of the plant has been, or will be, considered in the appropriate process pertaining to the current operating license.
Thank you for your interest in the license renewal process at Indian Point.
Sincerely,
/RA/
P. T. Kuo, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION: See next page Adams Accession: Pkg: ML072410399; Incoming: ML071930400; Response: ML072410440 OFFICE LA:NRR:
DLR PM:REBB:
DLR D:DLR NAME SFigueroa BPham GCwalina EWilliamson RFranovich PTKuo DATE 8/13/07 8/9/07 8/14/07 8/10/07 8/16/07 8/28/07 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to S. Shapiro from P. T. Kuo, dated August 28, 2007
SUBJECT:
LTR-07-0458 - LTR. SUSAN SHAPIRO RE: COMPLAINTS ON INDIAN POINT DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsEdoMailCenter RidsSecyMailCenter RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrWpcMail RidsRgn1MailCenter RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb BPham RFranovich KGreen JCaverly RAuluck MKowal JBoska ECobey, RI GMeyer, RI MMcLaughlin, RI NMcNamara, RI RBarkley, RI GBowman, RI CHott, RI RConte, RI MCox, RI DJackson, RI BWittick, RI NSheehan, RI OPA DScrenci, RI OPA SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA RShane, OCA UShoop, OEDO
cc:
Michel Lee, Esq., Chairman Council on Intelligent Energy &
Conservation Policy (CIECP) 265 Madison Road Scarsdale, NY 10583 Sherwood Martinelli Green Nuclear Butterfly 351 Dyckman Street Peekskill, NY 10566 Kenneth Okin 570 Scarborough Road Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 Lucille Weinstat 8 Half Moon Road Beacon, NY 12508 Marilyn Elie 2A Adrian Court Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567 Allegra Dengler 60 Judson Avenue Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 Patricia C. Kenschaft 56 Gordonhurst Avenue Montclair, NJ 07043 Frederick D. Chichester 56 Gordonhurst Avenue Montclair, NJ 07043 Bonnie Schepira 126 Walgrove Avenue Dobbs Ferry, NY 10522 Laurie Evans P.O. Box 560 Katonah, NY 10536 Gary Shaw 9 Van Cortlandt Place Croton on Hudson, NY 10520 Elizabeth C. Segal 33 Fairview Avenue Tarrytown, NY 10591 Fred Silverman 18 Twin Ponds Drive Bedford Hills, NY 10507 Ellen Saltzman 3091 Hickory Street Yorktown, NY 10598 Matthew Zeltzer 24 First Avenue Nyack, NY 10960 Joyce Bressler 24 First Avenue Nyack, NY 10960 Victor Tiship 80 Seifert Lane Nyack, NY 10960 Remy Chevalier 25 Newtown Turnpike Weston, CT 06883 Manna Jo Greene Hudson River Sloop Clearwater 112 Market St.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Mark Mantell 3805 Cranberry Ln.
Shrub Oak, NY 10588 Margo Schepart 2651 Broadview Drive Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 Corrina Kurtz 509 Van Cortlandt Park Avenue Yonkers, NY 10705
cc: Andrew L. Fishkin 22 Lark Lane Croton on Hudson, NY 10520 Dorice Madronero 4 Regis Court Suffern, NY 10901 Leslie A. Mantrone 19 Somerstown Road Ossining, NY 10562 John Crockett 24 Sol Drive Carmel, NY 10512