|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML13357A3192013-12-19019 December 2013 Comment (00589) of John M. Garza on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011 Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment ML1019301262010-07-0606 July 2010 Comment (1) of George Robertson, South Carolina & Gas Company, on Pr 50 Regarding American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and Revised ASME Code Cases ML0929407572009-10-19019 October 2009 2009/10/19-Comment (36) of Jeffrey B. Archie on Behalf of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (Sce&G) on Proposed Rules Pr 50 and 52, Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations ML0717604982007-06-25025 June 2007 Comment (5) Submitted by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Bruce Thompson. on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 73, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials ML0705701522007-02-23023 February 2007 Comment (1) Submitted by Damon Bryson on Proposed Rules PR-40, 72, 74 and 150 Re Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System ML0536301082005-12-21021 December 2005 Comment (65) Submitted by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Jeffrey B. Archie on Proposed Rule PR-26 Re Fitness for Duty Programs ML0510402252005-03-30030 March 2005 Comment (21) Submitted by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Jeffrey B. Archie on Proposed Rule Pr 2, 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 63, 71, 72, 73, 76 & 150 Re Protection of Safeguards Information ML0320404772003-07-16016 July 2003 Comment (9) Submitted by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Steven A. Byrne, on Sander C. Perle Petion for Rulemaking PRM 20-25 Re Requirements That Dosimetry Used as Primary Dosimeter Shall Be Accredited ML0306300212003-02-0707 February 2003 Comment (44) Submitted by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Stephen A. Byrne Re Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-79, Protection for Daycare Centers and Nursery Schools in Radiological Emergency ML0231102062002-10-30030 October 2002 Comment (17) Submitted by Sce&G Company, Stephen A. Byrne on Proposed Rule (Dfr) PR-Chapter 1 Re Maintenance and Submission of Information 2013-12-19
[Table view] |
Text
1 SECY - PRM-73-13, comments on the Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Union of Concerned Scientists (72 Fed. ~e@a@Z4l4[
PRM-73-13 (72FR17440)
From:
To:
Date:
"THOMPSON, BRUCE L" <BTHOMPSON@scana.com>
<secy@nrc.gov>
Mon, Jun 25,2007 1.06 PM Q
Subject:
PRM-73-13, comments on the Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Union of Concerned Scientists (72 Fed. Reg. 17440)
Reference:
Mr. Douglas J. Walters, Nuclear Energy Institute letter to DOCKETED the Secretary, USNRC, dated June 22, 2007 USNRC June 25,2007 (2:26pm)
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) has reviewed the above OFFICE OF SECRETARY subject Petition for Rulemaking and the referenced letter from the RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Nuclear Energy lnstitute (NEI) to the USNRC. SCE&G endorses the comments made by NEI in the referenced letter.
Should you have any questions, please call Mr. Bruce Thompson at (803) 931-5042 at your convenience.
1 c:\temp\GW}00001 .TMP Page I 1 Mail Envelope Properties (467FF5EF.8BO : 15 : 43 184)
Subject:
PRM-73-13, comments on the Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by the Union of Concerned Scientists (72 Fed. Reg. 17440)
Creation Date Mon, Jun 25,2007 1 :05 PM From: "THOMPSON, BRUCE L" <BTHOMPSON@scana.com>
Created By: BTHOMPSON@scana.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWP002.HQGWD001 SECY (SECY)
Post Office Route TWGWP002.HQGWD001 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 477 Monday, June 25,2007 1:05 PM TEXT.htm 2268 Mime.822 5344 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled