ML071710119

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Technical Specifications for Amendment No. 266, Issuance of Amendments Relocation of Response Time Testing Limits (TAC Nos. MD2804 & MD2805)
ML071710119
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/2007
From:
Plant Licensing Branch III-2
To:
Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
Shared Package
ml071300511 List:
References
TAC MD2804, TAC MD2805
Download: ML071710119 (10)


Text

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No.266 , are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

(3) Special Low Power Test Program PSE&G shall complete the training portion of the Special Low Power Test Program in accordance with PSE&G's letter dated September 5, 1980 and in accordance with the Commission's Safety Evaluation Report "Special Low Power Test Program",

dated August 22, 1980 (See Amendment No. 2 to DPR-75 for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 2) prior to operating the facility at a power level above five percent.

Within 31 days following completion of the power ascension testing program outlined in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report, PSE&G shall perform a boron mixing and cooldown test using decay heat and Natural Circulation. PSE&G shall submit the test procedure to the NRC for review and approval prior to performance of the test. The results of this test shall be submitted to the NRC prior to starting up following the first refueling outage.

(4) Initial Test Program PSE&G shall conduct the post-fuel-loading initial test program (set forth in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report, as amended) without making any major modifications of this program unless modifications have been identified and have received prior NRC approval. Major modifications are defined as:

(a) Eliminatioxn of any test identified in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report, as amended, as essential; (b) Modification of test objectives, methods or acceptance criteria for any test identified in Chapter 13 of the Final Safety Analysis Report, as amended, as essential; (c) Performance of any test at a power level different by more than five percent of rated power from there described; and Amendment No. 266

3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.1 REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.1.1 As a minimum, the reactor trip system instrumentation channels and interlocks of Table 3.3-1 shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3-1.

ACTION:

As shown in Table 3.3-1.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS, 4.3.1.1.1 Each reactor trip system instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations for the MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-1.

4.3.1.1.2 The logic for the interlocks shall be demonstrated OPERABLE prior to each reactor startup unless performed during the preceding 92 days.

The total interlock function shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 18 months during CHANNEL CALIBRATION testing of each channel affected by interlock operation.

4.3.1:1.3 The REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME of each reactor trip function shall be verified to be within its limit at least once per 18 months. Neutron detectors are exempt from response time testing. Each verification shall include at least one logic train such that both logic trains are verified at least once per 36 months and one channel per function such that all channels are verified at least once every N times 18 months where N is the total number of redundant channels in a specific reactor trip function as shown in the "Total No. of Channels" column of Table 3.3-1.

.SALEM UNIT.2 3/4 3-1 Amendment No. 266

Page Left Blank Intentionally SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-9 Amendment No266

Page Left Blank Intentionally SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-10 Amendment No.266

INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.2 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.2.1 The Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) instrumentation channels and interlocks shown in Table 3.3-3 shall be OPERABLE with their trip setpoints set consistent with the values shown in the Trip Setpoint column of Table 3.3-4.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3-3.

ACTION:

a. With an ESFAS instrumentation channel trip setpoint less conservative than the value shown in the Allowable Values column of Table 3.3-4, declare the channel inoperable and apply the applicable ACTION requirement of Table 3.3-3 until the channel is restored to OPERABLE status with the trip setpoint adjusted consistent with the Trip Setpoint value.
b. With an ESFAS instrumentation channel inoperable, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-3.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.2.1.1 Each ESFAS instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations for the MODES and at frequencies shown in Table 4.3-2.

4.3.2.1.2 The logic for the interlocks shall be demonstrated OPERABLE during the automatic actuation logic test. The total interlock function shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 18 months during CHANNEL CALIBRATION testing of each channel affected by interlock operation.

4.3.2.1.3 The ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES RESPONSE TIME of each ESFAS function shall be verified to be within the limit at least once per 18 months. Each verification shall include at least one logic train such that both logic trains are verified at least once per 36 months and one channel per function such that all channels are verified at least once per N times 18 months where N is the total number of redundant channels in a specific'ESFAS function as shown in the "Total No. of Channels" Column of Table 3.3-3. The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable to MSIV closure time testing.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable to the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump provided the surveillance is performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after the secondary steam generator pressure is greater than 680 psig.

SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-14 Amendment No.266

Page Left Blank Intentionally SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-1'28 Amendment No. 266

Page Left Blank Intentionally I SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-29 Amendment No.266

Page Left Blank Intentionally I SALEM -,UNIT 2 3/4 3-30 Amendment No. 266

Page Left Blank Intentionally SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-31 Amendment No 266

Page Left Blank Intentionally I SALEM - UNIT 2 3/4 3-32 Amendment No. 266