ML071510139
| ML071510139 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 02/08/2007 |
| From: | Gerard van Noordennen Yankee Atomic Electric Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME |
| References | |
| Download: ML071510139 (39) | |
Text
Figure 5-1 Tritium in Downgradient Monitoring Wells 2004-2006 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 CL E. 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 A-0 Aug-04 Nov-04 Feb-05 May-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Sample date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
500 Yankee Nuclear Distribution of Tritium in Groundwater in Glaciofluvial Unit, Sept. 2006 Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: Kriging with Anisotropy ratio of 1.5, long axis oriented N65W Contour Intervals begin at 1000 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval Figure 5-2 2/13/07
500 Yankee Nuclear Distribution of Tritium in Groundwater in Upper Till Unit, Sept. 2006 Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: Kriging with Anisotropy ratio of 1.5, long axis oriented N65W Contour Intervals begin at 1000 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval Figure 5-3 MW-104D value from 10/11/06 2/13/07
Stratigraphic Legend SGF Aso STill sýp SandLensi pq cjzý 0
'ýýO 0 0
-0 P
0 0
0 C) 0 0
I 0*
LI S. I I I [ T T T ~1 A 1 272.800 7 -X 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272.600 273,000 Y I I I I I I 3 t I 3 I I I 3,093,800,0 3,093,600.0 3,093,400.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section AA' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Sept. 6, 2006, in pCilL Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour intervals increase from 500 pCi/L by a factor of 2 over next lower interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure5-5 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I
9)O C) Stratigraphic Legend 0 jGF i SandLens1 Till2 00 C0C U1 0 0 Till I 003 CA O iý Sand-Lens3-CO rdI4 Ln 0
C0 I/-I 9tnd -Lens4 31-2 31-3 X -I- I i-X ýock I
2272,000.0 I I
- I 272,200.0 2 2I 0 .
272,400.0 272,600.0 V y
I T 3,093,600.0 3,093,700.0 3,093,800.0 3,093,900.0 Yankee NuclearFiaGrud Cross Section BB' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Sept. 06, 2006, in pCiIL Final Groundwater te Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-6 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft.
Stratigraphic Legend GF Tdl
'Ný,,(b& 0 ýSandLensl C0 0
- Sond-Leng3 LO 014
- 0. tknd -Lens4
-/ GL2 GL3 V Rock 272,400.0 272,500.0 3,094,000.0 3,093,500.0 3,093,000.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section CC' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Sept. 6, 2006, in pCilL Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-7 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft.
Q)
Stratigraphic 0
Legend 0
0 0- i 0 500 100 0
N t'3 0
0 0 0 -0 0 o Ca
- 0) 500 s2ni I en-3 0
-- 0 TH14 CD 0
I 0 0
0 0I 0)
GL2 Lems-4 n,.F%
Li CD C)
GL3 I Q_ Rock y- ~ I 272,300.0 272,400.0 272,500.0 272.600.0 Y 1 3 I I y 3,093,600.0 3,093,800.0 Yankee NuclearFiaGrud Cross Section DD' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Sept. 6, 2006, in pCiIL Final Groundwaterte Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-8 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I1I
Stratigraphic Legend 0'
- 0. 0
- 00) -0
-0 500~
0 0O) -0
-0
-0 0
0 500 -- 500 -. 500o 0
/
C)
C))
-0
-0 0
0)
TH14 to
/ GL3 X j I T I -- I -- . I I - I x Rock GL2Smr'-Lens3 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 Y V I3I I I I 3,9,I I 0 I I I I 3,093,625.0 3,093,600.0 Cross Section EE' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Sept. 6,2006, in pCilL Final Groundwater te Yankee NuclearFiaGrud Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-9 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I1I
500 0)
Cý ct Cq ch ct (co 272,000 273,000 Yankee Nuclear Distribution of Tritium in Groundwater in Glaciofluvial Unit, Dec. 2006 Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: Kriging with Anisotropy ratio of 1.5, long axis oriented N65W Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval Figure5-10 2/13/07
C C
CL C- M Ct C) 272,000 273,000 Yankee Nuclear Distribution of Tritium in Groundwater in Upper Till Unit, Dec. 2006 Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: Kriging with Anisotropy ratio of 1.5, long axis oriented N65W Contour Intervals begin at 1000 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval Figure 2/13/07 Fiur 5
Stratigraphic Legend GF Tdl P '-0 SandLens1 6sý' 0 N(Z' C.
0 0
0-0 0
nd Lens4 0-0 GL2 x 271,800 II I 1 1 I 1 I F~n1 I i I1 I x GL3-272.000 272,200 272.400 272.600 272,800 273,000 Rock Y I I - I II Y 3,093,800.0 3,093,600.0 3,093,400.0 te Yankee NuclearFiaGrud Cross Section AA' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Dec. 6, 2006, in pCi/L Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-12 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I/./0
5b Ab Stratigraphic 0*Nz Legend
-0 i -0
-0 x--
-0 0
/ Sand ens3
- o.
0)
Td[4 1000 "/
7O CC 0 -0 0 0 a3) 06: I GL2 GO!
ROckF x S T- T . ....1..................... I . I X 272,000.0 272,200.0 272,400.0 272,600.0 y
3I,30 I I I 3 3,093,600.0 3,093,700.0 3,093,800.0 3,093,900.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section BB' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Dec. 6, 2006, in pCil/L Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-13 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I1I
Stratigraphic Legend GF
"ý'Ap Till Sand_Lensi
-p
-8 Ti12 0
Ti0l4 K 0' 0
atnd Lens4 GL2 an LnS 0
X I I I--1 1 1 I- - -... 1 x Y II 272,400.0 272,500.0 IF T 3
3,093,500.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section CC' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Dec. 6,2006, in pCi/L Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-14 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft.
Nlzý 61ý'
Stratigraphic Legend 6
-0
-co
--0 D'
0 0 0 C
C 0
- 0
-0 0-T~dI ei4 0
C>
00 01O lknd ýLens4 It') o 7/I GL2 o GL3 Rock XI x I
272,300.0 I I I I 272,500.0 272,400.0 272,600.0 Y- Y 3
3,093,600.0 3 3,093,800.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section DD' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Dec. 6, 2006, in pCl/L Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-15 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I1I
Stratigraphic of Legend GF TnL Cý Sand-Lens1 0
C5 o 0 C- -0 0
C5 0 C) 0 -0
-500 .--- 0' 0 0
0 0 0 0 -0
-0 "11114 00 0O -0 ens4 Lnd 0 0' 7, .1.)n GL2 GL3 x I I x Rock 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 ,#
Y III I T I3I I I 5 3,093,625.0 3,093,600.0 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section EE' Showing Isocons of Tritium on Dec. 6, 2006 Final Groundwater Power Station See Figure 5-4 for X-Section Location Condition Report Rowe, MA Contouring Algorithm: 3-D Inv. Distance with N65W Directional Bias Contour Intervals begin at 500 pCi/L and increase by a factor of 2 for each succeeding interval X-axis: Mass State Plane Grid Coordinates, NAD83, Ft. 2/13/07 Figure 5-16 Y-axis: Elevation, NAVD88, Ft. I1I
Figure 5-17 Tritium in MW-105B Q1 through Q4 2006 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 4-I-
2,000 1,000 0 -
Feb-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Sample Date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Figure 5-18 Tritium in Down-Trending Monitoring Wells 2006 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 o 25,000 E
20,000 1-15,000 10,000 5,000 0 -
Dec-05 Feb-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Sample date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Figure 5-19 Tritium in Down-Trending Monitoring Wells 2006 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 o 5,000 a.
E 4,000 I-3,000 2,000 1,000 0 -
Dec-05 Feb-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Sample date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Figure 5-20 Upward Tritium Trend MW-11OC 3,000 2,500 2,000 0.
E 1,500 --0-MW-1100 I--
1,000 500 0 -
Feb-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Sample Date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Figure 5-21 Tritium in MW-107C 2003-2006 60,000 50,000 Soil Remed iation in SFP/IXP Area 40,000 It I E 30,000 I I 20,000 Well-head damaged allowing
- MWIO0C
, surface water into monitori g well 10,000 0
0 Jun-03 Dec-03 Jun-04 Dec-04 Jun-05 Dec-05 Jun-06 Dec-06 Jun-07 Sample Date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Figure 5-22 Tritium in CFW-6 2006 3000 2500 2000 a
E 1500 1000 500 01-Feb-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Sample date Yankee Nuclear Power Station Final Groundwater Rowe, MA 2/8/2007 Condition Report
Yankee Nuclear FSS Tritium Soil Concentrations in Concrete Rubble Storage Area Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA A FSS Data Point for Soil Concentration of Tritium 2/2/07 Figure 5-23 Contoured Concentrations of Tritium are in pCi/gram
c, 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,00ce f V) 0ý CD 0 0ý vi0 T_ CD OD- -CD oCt CO to Ct C)r r Reactor ITte C41- -Ci1 o o)
, ," o 0o )
CD '
CL k.Ar.
0\"l*
0 ; \CD CL o CL e* "-.. , *Feet c
"'*--... ,3,000 4,500 *. 6,000 Q 0)
CL, Co , =Go
°l
- ,D-- ,,
C)li 00A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,000 Yankee Nuclear Location of Known Bedrock Elevations Final Groundwater Condition Report Power Station Bedrock Elevation known from seismic work, drilling, or field mapping Rowe,Indicates area of no-flow boundary around outside of groundwater model 1/07 Figure 6-1
Q 40 o 271,500 271,700 1
271,900 1
272,100 1
272,300 1
272,500 1
272,700 I 272,900 a
273,100 1
'~
CD ct C,)
CO 47 Ct Cn Ct m Ct 0
Q I.-.
-4n, 0)
C.)
CD Ct C.) 4 Cm CA
/
Ct Cý m,
C.
CO CD Cm Q,
CD M)
C,)
Feet 0 50 100 200 300 400 500 I I I I I I 271,500 271,700 271,900 272,100 272,300 272,500 272,700 272,900 273,100 Final Groundwater Yankee Nuclear Location of Borings and Monitoring Wells Condition Report Power Station Rowe, MA Geologic borings and monitoring wells, not including ISFSI boreholes Figure 6-2 1 which did not go to bedrock 1/12/07
' 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,00cg qr- F,-
AMR*
L94 4 `M WT 7,
&%4o4c na 2070 o 7M 750%1,50 3,00 4500E6000 Yankee Nuclear Groundwater Model Finite-Difference Grid Final Groundwater Condition Report Power Station Oj Model Boundary Rowe, MA I Indicates area of no-flow boundary around outside of groundwater model 1/12/07 Figure6-3
o 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,000 o 4 o o, CID SI ot r q m v
I Former Reactor Site I o Ct t Ct oM-0 k Go-o S" 00
"* Feet vi
-,,.....0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 R R*J 40 ' e C/q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,000 Pre-demo Groundwater Model Boundary Conditions Final Groundwater Yankee Nuclear Constant Head Condition Report Power Station Rowe, MA 3rd-Type Node, or Drain Figure 6-4 Indicates area of no-flow boundary around outside of groundwater model 1/12/07
Yankee Nuclear Elevation of Top of Bedrock Surface Final Groundwater Power Station Contouring algorithm: minimum curvature with 100' grid spacing Condition Report Rowe, MA Contour Interval 50' Figure 6-5 Referenced to NAVD88 1/13/07
oc 260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,0009 CD 4 A.,
O g aC, Ct Ct o o CD CD C2.
CDC C'C m -Ob Ck Q1')
M 3 C, Ct R C4 I"T-260,000 262,000 264,000 266,000 268,000 270,000 272,000 274,000 276,000 278,000 280,000 282,000 284,000 286,000 Yankee Nuclear Layer 1 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-6 1/13/07
Legend Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value 14 10.00 13 5.000 12 1.000 II 6.000e-003 10 5.600e-002 0.150 8 1,000 7 1.000e-002 6 10.00 5 LI 1.000 4 0.100 3 5.000 6.000e-002 C-S-fl- F 1 Li- 10.00 Yankee Nuclear Cross Section along Center of Row 22 of the Model Final Groundwater Power Station Showing Layering and Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Condition Report Rowe, MA Hydraulic Conductivity in Feet per Day 1/30/07 Figure 6-6A
Legend Hydraulic Conductity Zone Value 14 10.00 13 12 1.000 11 6.000e-003 10 5.600e-002 9 0.150 8 1.000 7 1.000e-002 10.00 5 1.000 4 0.100 3 5.000 2 6.000e-002 1 10.00 CýSecb-Cross Section along Center of Column 48 of the Model Final Groundwater Yankee Nuclear Showing Layering and Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Condition Report Power Station Rowe, MA Hydraulic Conductivity is in Feet per Day 1/30/07 Figure 6-6B
.70,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 p I I IC D
C2 CO eC" 00 01 Cý CO 00 Vi*
CO)
Ct C2 (,i Ct CO Ct
- o.
0 00 270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 2 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-7 1/13/07
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 a
/-a 0m, Q
a, MW7\z)
CC egeno a,
I .3 Zon Qi a) 2
-I CIt ac C*
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 3 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-8 1/13/07 Fgr
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 27 00 271,800 I
272,000 I
272,200 I
272,400 I
272,600 I
272,800 I
27 D0 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 p Q a
R Q
Cli 0)
Ct CM C*
/ Q Ct C.
Q cct M_ C) e)
Ct co .egend Ct
.4 Zonelt r
C" 0
C Cq C) 0 m = F11j A Cm, CD Ci C*
CD C x CD 01 C4 Ck Cý 0
C*
02 270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 4 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-9 1/13/0 7
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Ci It -
M R
Cq 0
-ar Ch 0**
Cq Ci
- 0) M Q
cli Q
CD cli M CI, R
m 0
N4.
Mo 270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 5 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-10 1/13/07
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0j, I C2 Im 9i It ap ct a~
/z Legend IC A
C' L Zone am ak en 7,", 40j, -3 2
[
N Ca
-I I N 0 (2j IR N4 m
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 6 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-11 1/13/07
273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 C
C 6ýI C
C Ck 0C C I .egend CO C"
C)
V CP /1 C*
40
- 0) 2 Ci Ct
)/I I Ct 9
CD C2 Ic Cý m2 -C, CP C'V C,)
Cq 0.
Ct CM 0
R 222 270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 2749400 Yankee Nuclear Layer 7 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-12 1/1 3/07
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400
't liii aRo CD 0
Ci 14 0)
Ct m
Ct C2.
Ut Co Ct C4 Q
Legend Q)
Ct a L8,9,11,13 Zoi C*
Ct M
2 2 Q 0)
-9 CO Ck
.C Ct M'
0) 0),
Wz C'
2 0 270,800 271,000 271 ,200 271,400 271,600 271,800 272,000 272,200 272,400 272,600 272,800 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 Yankee Nuclear Layers 8, 9, 11, and 13 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-13
270,800 271,000 271,200 271,400 271,600 273,000 273,200 273,400 273,600 273,800 274,000 274,200 274,400 0)
CD m
Ci Ct
°R 0 one Ro 3o R*
- '* o Cqo 0 1 R
em 27,002100 7,2011,00716027,0 220000,002240 7,602200 730027,0 23600236007,8024R0OO42027,0 Yankee Nuclear Layer 10 Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution Final Groundwater Power Station Condition Report Rowe, MA Figure 6-14 1/13/07