ML071360445

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Presentation Slides, Plant Performance Review Indian Point Energy Center, from 2007 Annual Assessment Meeting - Entergy'S
ML071360445
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2007
From:
Entergy Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML071360445 (28)


Text

Plant Performance Review Indian Point Energy Center April 26, 2007

Agenda

  • Overview Fred Dacimo
  • Plant Performance Tony Vitale
  • Corrective Action Program Jim Comiotes Safety Conscious Work Environment

- Procedure Upgrade

  • Engineering Update Tom Orlando
  • Closing Fred Dacimo 2

Progress at Indian Point

  • Evaluated FEMA Exercise
  • Successful Force-on-Force Exercise
  • Low dose record at IP3
  • 3R14 Refueling outage
  • Capability Factor IPEC - Highest net generation in stations history 3

Challenges at Indian Point

  • Emergency Notification System
  • Unplanned Shutdowns
  • Safety Conscious Work Environment
  • Procedure Adequacy 4

Plant Performance Tony Vitale Operations Manager

Plant Performance IP2 Capability Factor Capability Factor - Month Capability Factor - YTD YTD Goal(%)

99.69 99.82 99.98 98.84 98.75 98.88 100 89.02 89.78 88.36 88.9 87.04 85.44 84.03 81.3 80 77.59 60 40 20 0

Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07

Plant Performance IP3 Capability Factor Capability Factor - Month Capability Factor - YTD YTD Goal (%)

100 100 99.99 99.99 99.99 99.98 99.16 99.23 99.97 99.99 98.69 98.85 98.98 99.08 100 80 72.35 60 40 20 0

Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07

Unplanned Shutdowns

  • Analyzed shutdowns for common causes
  • Root cause investigations showed three (3) focus areas

- Maintenance work and trouble shooting practices

- Procedure adequacy

- Completion and implementation of Single Point Vulnerability study 8

Operational Focus 3/4 Shift Manager Leadership 3/4 Plan of the Day 3/4 Fleet Peer Group 3/4 Operator Training 3/4 Aggregate Index 9

Operator Aggregate Impact Index IP2 Operator Aggregate Im pact Index - Non-Outage Goal Operator Aggregate Im pact Index - Non-Outage 1.20 1.00 0.91 0.96 0.89 good 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.75 0.63 0.63 0.60 0.54 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.20 0.00 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 10

Operator Aggregate Impact Index IP3 Operator Aggregate Impact Index - Non-Outage Goal Operator Aggregate Impact Index - Non-Outage 1.20 1.00 good 0.83 0.80 0.58 0.60 0.5 0.48 0.46 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.43 0.45 0.40 0.37 0.3 0.32 0.26 0.2 0.20 0.00 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 11

Corrective Maintenance Non-Outage CM Backlog Non-Outage Goal 70 60 60 51 50 50 49 47 40 38 good 36 35 35 33 31 30 30 29 27 20 20 10 0

Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07

Elective Maintenance Non-Outage Outage Non-Outage Goal 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07

Industrial Safety Recordable Injury Rate - Month Recordable Injury Rate - YTD Goal - YTD 3.00 2.64 2.50 2.34 2.00 1.50 1.38 1.01 1.05 1.18 0.89 0.9 0.9 0.95 1.00 0.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 RIR = number of recordable injuries/200,000 person-hours

Infrastructure Improvements Vapor Containment Sump Modification New Reactor Coolant Pump 15

Infrastructure Improvements Pavement Resurfacing New Outage Control Center 16

Focus Areas - 2007

  • Industrial Safety
  • Human Performance
  • Material Condition
  • Work Control
  • Alignment 17

Corrective Action Program Jim Comiotes Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance

Corrective Action Program Station Improvements

  • Improvements have been made

- Common Cause Procedure

- Apparent Cause evaluation score sheets

- Condition Report generation rate high

- Condition Report back log 19

7

-0 ar M 7 0

b-Fe 7 0

n-Ja 6 0

c-De 6 Continued Condition Report 0

v-No 6

-0 ct O 6 0

p-Se 6 0

g-Au 6

IPEC Open and Initiated Condition Reports l-0 Ju 6 0

n-Ju 6

-0 ay M 6 r-0 Ap 6

-0 ar M 6 0

b-Open Condition Month Fe 06 n-Ja 5 0

c-De 5 0

v-Inventory Reduction Condition Reports No 5 Reports

-0 ct O 5 0

p-Se 5 0

g-Au Initiated 5

l-0 Ju 5 0

n-Ju 5

-0 ay M 5 r-0 Goal = 750 Ap 5

-0 ar M 5 0

b-Fe 5 0

n-Ja 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Number of CRs

Corrective Action Program Corrective Action Program has identified two areas for focused attention:

3/4Safety Conscious Work Environment 3/4Procedure Upgrade 21

Safety Conscious Work Environment

  • Issue Identification

- Entergy survey showed declining trend

- Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection (NRC)

  • Program Diagnostics

- Survey of Employee Concerns cases

- Independent assessment

- Independent document review

  • Programmatic Enhancements

- Executive Review Board

- Executive Protocol Group

- Training 22

Safety Conscious Work Environment

  • Improved Management/Employee Communication Plan

- Vice President small group meetings with employees

- Periodic meetings

- Messages from site leadership

- Tailgate articles

- ECP Communication

  • Restructured Station Calendar

- Leadership team presence at work site (in-field coaching)

- Weekly management/employee meetings (tailgates) 23

Safety Conscious Work Environment

  • Measures of Progress

- Traditional Performance Indicators

- Feedback from tailgate

- June Assessment

- Follow up Assessment in January 24

Procedure Upgrade Project

  • Corrective Action Program identified procedure adequacy as site issue
  • Procedure upgrades are mainly operations, maintenance and instrument and control
  • Action plan developed in late 2006
  • Intensive resources being applied to ensure high quality product and incorporation of best practices of both units
  • Procedures screened to ensure high priority ones completed first
  • The project will be completed by end of 2008.

25

Engineering Tom Orlando Director, Engineering

Engineering 2006 Performance

  • Fleet Standardization
  • Design Basis

- Design Basis Initiative

- Component Design Basis Inspection (IP2)

  • Backlog Reduction

- Corrective Action Program

- Engineering Request

- Configuration Management

  • Focus on Engineering Quality 27

Closing Remarks Fred Dacimo Site Vice President