Text

2006 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the Period January Through December 2006
	ML071220274
Person / Time
Site:	Kewaunee
Issue date:	04/27/2007
From:	Hartz L; Dominion, Dominion Energy Kewaunee
To:	; Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR/ADRO
References
	07-0287, FOIA/PA-2010-0209
	Download: ML071220274 (257)
	v • d • e

Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. D DomilnlO N490 Highway 42, Kewaunee, WI 54216-9511 APR 27 Z007 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 07-0287 Attention: Document Control Desk KPS/LIC/NW: RO Washington, DC 20555 Docket No. 50-305 License No. DPR-43 DOMINION ENERGY KEWAUNEE. INC.

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION 2006 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT Enclosed is a copy of the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) 2006 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January through December 2006. This report is submitted to meet the requirements of KPS Technical Specification 6.9.b.2 and 10 CFR 50.36a(a)(2).

In a letter from Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (DEK) to the NRC, dated April 28, 2006 (reference 1), a required correction from the 2001 to 2005 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Reports was identified. The item identified was a computer program used to calculate gaseous releases that did not include the volume purged at the end of the release. The updated data is included with this report.

If you have questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Mr.

Mike Hale at 920-388-8103.

Very truly yours, Leslie N. Hartz Site Vice President, Kewaunee Power Station Reference

1. Letter from Michael G. Gaff ney (DEK) to Document Control Desk (NRC) dated April 28, 2006, "Radioactive Effluent Release Report January - December 2005."

Enclosure Commitments made by this letter: NONE

Serial No. 07-0287 Page 2 of 2 cc: Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, Illinois 60532-4352 Ms. Margaret H. Chernoff Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 8 G9A Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Kewaunee Power Station Mr. W. A. Nestel Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 700 Galleria Parkway Atlanta, GA 30339 Mr. Don Hendrikse WI Division of Public Health Radiation Protection Section Room 150 Madison, WI 53701-2659 Ms. Deborah Russo American Nuclear Insurers 95 Glastonbury Blvd.

Glastonbury, CT 06033

ilDominion 2006 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Kewaunee Power Station Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.

DOCKET 50-305 KEWAUNEE POWER STATION ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT January 1 - December 31, 2006 Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.

Kewaunee, Wisconsin

Table of Contents Section Description 0.0 Sum m ary ...................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Effluent D ose Lim its ................................................ ......................................... 3 2.0 G aseous Effluents ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) for Gaseous Effluents ............................ 4 2.2 Gaseous Batch Release Statistics ....................... .......................................... 6 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Data .................................................................................. 6 Table 2.1 Gaseous Effluents - Summation of all Releases .......................... 7 Table 2.2 Gaseous Effluents ................................ 8 Table 2.3A Gaseous Total of all Releases .................................................. 10 Table 2.3B Gaseous Release Continuous .................................................. 18 Table 2.3C Gaseous Release Batch ............................................................ 26 Table 2.4 Dose From Gaseous Effluents ................................................. 34 3.0 Liquid Effluents .......................................................................................... 36 3.1 Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) for Liquid Effluents .............................. 36 3.2 Liquid Batch Release Statistics .............................................................. 38 3.3 Liquid Effl uent D ata.. ................................................... ................................ 38 Table 3.1 Liquid Effluents - Summation of all Releases............... 39 Table 3.2A Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases 1st Quarter ............ 40 Table 3.2B Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases 2nd Quarter ............ 42 Table 3.2C Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases 3rd Quarter ....................... 44 Table 3.2D Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases 4th Quarter ....................... 46 Table 3.3A Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases 1st Quarter ................ 48 Table 3.3B Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases 2nd Quarter .............. 50 Table 3.3C Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases 3rd Quarter .............. 52 Table 3.3D Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases 4th Quarter ............... 54 Table 3.4 Dose From Liquid Effluents ..................................................... 56 4.0 Unplanned Releases .................................................................................. 58 5.0 Meteorological Data .................................................................................... 58 6.0 Solid Waste Disposal .................................................................................. 58 Table 6.1 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments ............................... 59 7.0 Progiamm Revisions................ I........................................................................ 61 8.0 Reportable Occurrences ....... ..................................................................... 62 Appendix A Meteorological Data Appendix B Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)

Appendix C Revised Gas Doses (2001-2005)

Page 2 of 63

0.0

SUMMARY

During 2006 all solid, liquid, and gaseous radioactive effluents from the Kewaunee Power Station were well below regulatory limits. For individual effluent streams, the quarterly limit most closely approached was:

GASEOUS: Ingestion Pathway-Organ Liver Quarterly Limit (mRems) 7.5 Actual Dose (mRems) 0.0001337 ( 4 th Quarter)

% of Specification 0.001783 LIQUID: Ingestion Pathway-Organ Total Body Quarterly Limit (mRems) 1.5 Actual Dose (mRems) 0.009768 ( 2 nd Quarter)

% of Limit 0.6512 SOLID: No upper limit for solid radioactive waste applies.

Cubic Meters Shipped 93.4 m3 (3298 ft3)

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of Kewaunee Technical Specifications, Section 6.9.b.2 and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Section 3/4.7. It includes data from all effluent releases made from January 1 - December 31, 2006. The report contains summaries of the gaseous and liquid releases made to the environment including the quantity, characterization, time duration and calculated radiation dose at the site boundary resulting from these releases. The report also includes a summation of solid waste disposal, revisions to the Process Control Program and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, and addresses the cumulative meteorological data. Values indicated as 0 (zero) in this report refer to actual values less than the detection limits. A table of these less than (LLD) values is identified in sections 2.1 and 3.1.

1.1 Effluent Dose Limits Specifications are set to insure that offsite doses are maintained as low as reasonably achievable while still allowing for practical and dependable operation of the Kewaunee Plant.

The Kewaunee Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) describes the methodology and parameters used in:

1.) The calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints.

2.) The calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates and cumulative quarterly and annual doses. The ODCM methodology is acceptable for use in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 20.1302; 10 CFR 50, Appendix I; and 40 CFR 190.

Page 3 of 63

2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) for Gaseous Effluents Gaseous radioactive effluents are released in both the continuous mode and the batch mode. The auxiliary building stack is sampled continuously for particulates, halogens and Strontium by an "off-line" sample train. This stack is also grab-sampled daily for gaseous gamma emitters. Batch releases are sampled prior to ielease for principal gaseous and particulate gamma emitters, halogens and tritium.

The LLDs for gaseous radioanalyses, as listed in Table 4.4 of the Kewaunee ODCM are:

Analysis LUD (pCi/ml)

Gaseous Principal Gamma Emitters 1.00 E-04 Iodine 131 3.00 E-12 Particulate Principal Gamma Emitters 1.00 E-11 Particulate Gross Alpha 1.00 E-11 Strontium 89, 90 1.00 E-l1 Noble Gases, Gross Beta or Gamma 1.00 E-06 The nominal "a priori" LLD values are shown below.

Isotope a priori LLD (gCi/ml)

a. Gaseous emissions:

Kr-87 5.61E-08 Kr-88 1.02E-07 Xe-133 6.68E-08 Xe-133m 2.75E-07 Xe-135 2.99E-08 Xe-138 1.13E-07 Page 4 of 63

b. Particulate emissions:

Mn-54 1.11E-13 Fe-59 2.27E-13 Co-58 2.28E-13 Co-60 3.57E-13 Zn-65 1.68E-13 Mo-99 2.73E- 13 Cs-134 4.69E-13 Cs-137 1.68E-13 Ce-141 2.08E-13 Ce-144 1.24E-12

c. Other identifiable gamma emitters:

Ar-41 3.97E-10 Kr-85 8.63E-05 .. d Kr-85m 4.62E-08 Kr-89 2.04E-06 Xe-127 4.20E-08 Xe-131m 1.82E-06 Xe-135m 1.90E-08

-_a Xe-137 2.88E-07 1-131 1.32E-13

d. Composite particulate samples:

Sr-89 1 E-14 Sr-90 1 E-14 Gross Alpha 1.00 E-14 These "a priori" LLDs represent the capabilities of the counting systems in use, not an after the fact "a posteriori" limit for a particular measurement.

Page 5 of 63

2.2 Gaseous Batch Release Statistics The following is a summation of all gaseous batch releases made during 2006.

Number of batch releases ..................... 65 Total time for all batch releases (min) ............ 26,749.0 Maximum time for a batch release (min) ............. 2,694.0 Average time for a batch release (min) ............. 411.5 Minimum time for a batch release (min) ............. 6.0 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Data The following table 2.1 presents a quarterly summation of the total activity released and average release rates of four categories of gaseous effluents. Table 2.2 lists the quarterly sums of individual gaseous radionuclides released by continuous and batch modes. Table 2.3 is essentially the same data, but is presented as monthly summations. Table 2.4 presents the dose limits for gaseous effluents, and the calculated doses this year from gaseous effluents.

Page 6 of 63

Table 2.1 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Gaseous Effluents - Summation of all Releases Fission and Activation Gases 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Activity Released (Ci) 3.411E-003 6.97713-003 5.655E-002 2.158E-003 Average Release Rate (ptCi/sec) 4.338E-004 8.873E-004 7.193E-003 2.744E-004 lodines Total Activity Released (Ci) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Average Release Rate (liCi/sec) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Particulates Total Activity Released (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 Average Release Rate (j.Ci/sec) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 1.093E-006 Gross Alpha Released (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 7.326E-005 Tritium Total Activity Released (Ci) 2.007E+000 1.983E+000 2.114E+000 4.877E+000 Average Release Rate (liCi/sec) 2.552E-001 2.523E-001 2.688E-001 6.203E-001 Page 7 of 63

Table 2.2 "

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Gaseous Effluents Nuclides Released (Ci)

Continuous Mode 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Fission Gases Total 0.OOO13+000 O.OOOE+O00 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 lodines Total 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Particulates Mn-54 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 8.439E-008 Co-57 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 3.618E-008 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 3.002E-008 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.00013+000 7.518E-006 Co-60 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 6.790E-007 Cs-137 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 0.000E+000 2.478E-007 Total O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 Page 8 of 63

Table 2.2(cont)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Gaseous Effluents Nuclides Released (Ci)

Batch Mode Fission Gases -s Ar-41 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 1.353E-002 O.OOOE+000 Xe-133m 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 4.430E-004 O.OOOE+000 Xe-133 3.411E-003 6.977E-003 4.256E-002 2.158E-003 Xe-135 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 1.704E-005 O.OOOE+000 Total 3.411E-003 6.977E-003 5.655E-002 2.158E-003 Iodines

-- d Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Particulates Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Page 9 of 63

Table 2.3A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Xe-133 O.OOOE+000 3.411E-003 0.OOOE+000 3.411E-003 Total 0.OOOE+O00 3.411E-003 O.OOOE+000 3.41 1E-003 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000

.Page 10 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Summary January February March Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 3.411E-003 O.OOOE+000 3.411E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) O.OOOE+000 1.614E+000 3.928E-001 2.007E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 11 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total

- Xe-133 O.OOOE+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003 Total O.OOOE+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003

.Particulates (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.000E4-OOO Halogens (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 12 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Summary April May June Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 4.584E-001 1.263E+000 2.618E-001 1.983E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 13 of 63

Table 2.3A(con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Ar-41 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 1.353E-002 1.353E-002 Xe-133m 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 4.430E-004 4.430E-004 Xe-133 0.OOOE+000 2.437E-003 4.012E-002 4.256E-002 Xe-135 0.OOOE+000 1.206E-005 4.980E-006 1.704E-005 Total 0.0012+O000 2.449E-003 5.410E-002 5.655E-002 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Total 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total

%- Total O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 14 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Summary July August September Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 2.449E-003 5.41 OE-002 5.655E-002 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 5.016E-003 4.009E-002 2.069E+000 2.114E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 15 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total

-" Xe-133 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Total 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Mn-54 0.OOOE+000 8.439E-008 0.OOOE+O00 8.439E-008 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 3.618E-008 0.OOOE+000 3.618E-008 Co-58 0.00E+O00 3.002E-008 0.OOOE+000 3.002E-008

. Co-60 0.000E+000 7.518E-006 O.OOOE+000 7.518E-006 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 6.790E-007 O.OOOE+000 6.790E-007 Cs-137 O.OOOE+000 2.478E-007 0.OOOE+000 2.478E-007 Total 0.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 0.000E+000 8.595E-006 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Total O.OOOE+0OO 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+0OO Page 16 of 63

Table 2.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Total of all Releases Summary October November December Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 Total Tritium (Ci) 3.001E+000 8.445E-001 1.032E+000 4.877E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) 7.326E-005 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 7.326E-005 Page 17 of 63

Table 2.3B Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.0OOE+000 Page 18 of 63

Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Summary January February March Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Total Halogens (Ci) 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 1.606E+000 3.895E-001 1.995E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Page 19 of 63

Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Page 20 of 63

Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Summary April May June Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 4.505E-001 1.259E+000 2.618E-001 1.971E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 21 of 63

Table 2.3B (con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

- Isotope July August September Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000

%. Particulates (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Page 22 of 63

Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Summary July August September Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.00OE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Halogens (Ci> O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 o.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 o.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 1.013E+000 1.013E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000

-- d Page 23 of 63

Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Total O.OOOEtOOO O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+OOO Particulates (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 8.439E-008 0.000E+000 8.439E-008 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 3.618E-008 O.OOOE+000 3.618E-008 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 3.002E-008 0.OOOE+000 3.002E-008 Co-60 O.OOOE+000 7.518E-006 O.OOOE+000 7.518E-006 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 6.790E-007 O.OOOE+000 6.790E-007

._ Cs-137 O.OOOE+000 2.478E-007 O.OOOE+000 2.478E-007 Total 0.000E+000 8.595E-006 O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 Halogens (Curies)

% Isotope October November December Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 24 of 63

-W Table 2.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Continuous Mode Only Summary October November December Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 O.OOOE+000 8.595E-006 Total Tritium (Ci) 2.999E+000 8.43713-001 1.032E+000 4.874E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+OOO O.OOOE+000 Page 25 of 63

Table 2.3C Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Xe-133 0.OOOE+OOO 3.411E-003 0.OOO13+000 3.411 E-003 Total O.OOOE+OOO 3.41 1E-003 0.OOOE+00O 3.411E-003 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.O00E+O00 O.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope January February March Total Total O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 Page 26 of 63

Table 2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 1st Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Summary January February March Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 3.411E-003 O.OOOE+000 3.411 E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) O.OOOE+000 8.147E-003 3.238E-003 1.138E-002 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Page 27 of 63

Table 2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Xe-133 O.OOOE+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003 Total 0.000E+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total Total O.OOOE+OOO O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope April May June Total ft_ Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.O00E+O00 Page 28 of 63

Table.2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2nd Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Summary April May June Total

-S Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 4.933E-003 2.044E-003 6.977E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 7.925E-003 4.171E-003 7.830E-005 1.217E-002 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 29 of 63

Table 2.3C (con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Ar-41 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 1.353E-002 1.353E-002 Xe-133m 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 4.430E-004 4.430E-004 Xe-133 0.OOOE+000 2.437E-003 4.012E-002 4.256E-002 Xe-135 O.OOOE+000 1.206E-005 4.980E-006 1.704E-005 Total 0.OOOE+000 2.449E-003 5.410E-002 5.655E-002 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOO13+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00

%._ Halogens (Curies)

Isotope July August September Total Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.O00E+O00 Page 30 of 63

Table 2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3rd Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Summary July August September Total Total Noble Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 2.449E-003 5.410E-002 5.655E-002 Total Halogens (Ci) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+O00 0.OOOE+000 O.00013+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 5.016E-003 4.009E-002 1.056E+000 1.101E+000 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.00013+000 0.OOOE+000 0.00013+000 Page 31 of 63

Table 2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Noble Gasses (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Xe-133 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Total 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Particulates (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Total O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Halogens (Curies)

Isotope October November December Total Total O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 32 of 63

Table 2.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4th Quarter Gaseous Release Batch Mode Only Summary Octolber November December To tal Total Noble Gases (Ci) 1.389E-004 1.893E-003 1.255E-004 2.158E-003 Total Halogens (Ci) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Particulate Gross Beta-Gamma Half-Lives>8 Days (Ci) 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total Tritium (Ci) 1.972E-003 8.793E-004 7.747E-005 2.929E-003 Total Particulate Gross Alpha (Ci) 7.326E-005 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 7.326E-005 Page 33 of 63

Table 2.4 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Dose From Gaseous Effluents The offsite dose limits from radioactive materials in gaseous effluents are specified in Section 3/4.4 of the Kewaunee ODCM and can be summarized as follows:

Whole Body Skin Limit Gamma Beta Organ Quarterly 5.0 mRad 10.0 mRad 7.5 mRem Annual 10.0 mRad 20.0 mRad 15.0 mRem The total release of gaseous effluents during each quarter of 2006 was within limits. The following offsite doses were calculated using equations 2.7, 2.8, and 2.11 from the Kewaunee ODCM.

Calculated offsite doses versus quarterly limits are shown below:

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr h~.

1. Gamma-Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.0003E+000 5.OOOE+000 5.OOOE+000 5.0003E+000 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.374E-007 2.810E-007 1.610E-005 8.693E-008

% of Specification 2.748E-006 5.621E-006 3.220E-004 1.739E-006

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+001 1.0003E+001 1.000E+001 1.000E+001 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.087E-007 8.360E-007 1.025E-005 2.586E-007

% of Specification 4.087E-006 8.360E-006 1.025E-004 2.586E-006

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRems) 7.500E+000 7.500E+000 7.500E+000 7.500E+000 Actual Dose (mRems) 4.239E-005 4.190E-005 4.465E-005 .1.337E-004

% of Specification 5.652E-004 5.586E-004 5.954E-004 1.783E-003 Liver Liver Liver Liver Page 34 of 63

Table 2.4 (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Dose From Gaseous Effluents In addition, the cumulative annual offsite doses for the period January 1 - December 31, 2006 versus the ODCM annual limits were:

Annual

1. Gamma-Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.000E+001 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.660E-005

% of Specification 1.660E-004

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 2.OOOE+001 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.175E-005

% of Specification 5.874E-005

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRems) 1.500E+001 Actual Dose (mRems) 2.627E-004

% of Specification 1.751E-003 Liver Page 35 of 63

3.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3.1 Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) for Liquid Effluents Liquid radioactive effluents are released as both batch releases and continuous releases. Each batch is sampled prior to release and analyzed for gamma emitters and tritium. A fraction of each sample is retained for a monthly proportional composite which is then analyzed for Gross Alpha, Strontium 89, Strontium 90 and Iron 55.

The LLD's for liquid batch release radioanalyses, as listed in Table 4.3 of the Kewaunee Power Station Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, are:

Analysis LLD (UCi/ml)

Principal Gamma Emitters 1.00 E-06 Iodine 131 1.00 E-06 Tritium 1.00 E-05 Gross Alpha 5.00 E-07 Strontium 89, 90 5.00 E-08 Iron 55 1.00 E-06 The actual obtained "a priori" LLD values for batch releases are shown below.

Batch Releases Isotope 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Average a priori LLD (RCi/ml)

Mn-54 7.81E-10 1.35E-07 7.81E-10 7.88E-10 3.43E-08 Fe-59 1.74E-09 1.73E-09 1.74E-07 1.75E-09 4.48E-08 Co-58 7.66E-10 7.66E-08 7.66E-10 7.73E-10 1.97E-08 Co-60 1.15E-09 1.03E-09 1.15E-09 1.17E-09 1.13E-09 Zn-65 1.96E-09 1.95E-09 1.96E-09 1.98E-07 5.1OE-08 Mo-99 5.49E-09 5.57E-09 5.49E-09 5.81E-07 1.49E-07 Cs-134 7.22E-08 6.OOE-10 6.01E-10 1.28E-07 5.04E-08 Cs-137 8.98E-08 7.47E-10 8.36E-08 7.59E-10 4.37E-08 Ce-141 1.1 8E-07 1.1 8E-07 6.54E-08 4.77E-08 8.73E-08 Ce-144 2.93E-07 1.76E-09 6.95E-07 1.76E-09 2.48E-07 1-131 4.44E-08 4.46E-10 4.44E-10 5.58E-08 2.53E-08 H-3 3.12E-06 3.97E-06 3.71E-06 3.46E-06 3.57E-06 Sr-89 1.20E-08 1.60E-08 1.50E-08 1.20E-08 1.38E-08 Sr-90 7.30E-09 7.10E-09 7.60E-09 7.50E-09 7.38E-09 Gross Alpha 5.20E-09 4.60E-09 5.40E-09 6.OOE-09 5.30E-09 Fe-55 7.40E-07 6.90E-07 7.20E-07 9.OOE-07 7.63E-07 Page 36 of 63

Continuous liquid releases are grab sampled weekly and analyzed for principal gamma emitters. A fraction of each weekly sample is retained for a monthly proportional composite which is then analyzed for Tritium, Gross Alpha, Strontium 89, Strontium 90 and Iron 55.

The LLD's for liquid continuous release radioanalyses, as listed in Table 4.3 of the Kewaunee Power Station Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, are:

Analysis LLD (jtCi/ml)

Principal Gamma Emitters 5.00 E-07 Iodine 131 1.00 E-06 Tritium 1.00 E-05 Gross Alpha 5.00 E-07 Strontium 89, 90 5.00 E-08 -4 Iron 55 1.00 E-06 The actual obtained "a priori" LLD values for continuous releases are shown below.

-a Continuous Release Isotope 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Average a priori LLD (11Ci/ml)

Mn-54 1.30E-10 1.45E-08 1.30E-08 1.71E-08 1.12E-08 Fe-59 4.92E-08 2.89E-10 3.48E-08 2.92E-10 2.11 E-08 Co-58 2.55E-08 2.85E-08 1.28E-10 1.29E-10 1.36E-08 Co-60 2.30E-08 1.72E-10 1.91E-08 3.37E-08 1.90E-08 Zn-65 3.26E-10 3.26E-08 5.54E-08 3.29E-08 3.03E-08 Mo-99 2.68E-07 1.55E-07 2.93E-07 1.92E-07 2.27E-07 Cs-134 8.59E-08 3.8 1E-08 1.OOE-10 2.18E-08 3.65E-08 Cs-137 3.92E-08 4.1OE-08 3.54E-08 1.27E-10 2.89E-08 Ce-141 4.89E-08 3.20E-08 3.08E-08 4.72E-08 3.97E-08 Ce-144 2.94E- 10 2.44E-07 2.29E-07 1.87E-07 1.65E-07 1-131 3.09E-08 2.80E-08 2.06E-08 1.86E-08 2.45E-08 H-3 3.12E-06 3.97E-06 3.71E-06 3.46E-06 3.57E-06 Sr-89 1.40E-08 1.70E-08 1.85E-08 1.40E-08 1.59E-08 Sr-90 7.75E-09 7.25E-09 8.60E-09 7.40E-09 7.75E-09 Gross Alpha 5.40E-09 4.35E-09 5.75E-09 5.05E-09 5.14E-09 Fe-55 7.25E-07 7.05E-07 7.OOE-07 8.20E-07 7.38E-07 Page 37 of 63

3.2 Liquid Batch Release Statistics The following is a summation of all liquid batch releases made during 2006.

Release Type Number Gallons Released A SGBT Monitor Tk. 13 117,858 B SGBT Monitor Tk. 13 120,871 A CVC Monitor 18 120,435 B CVC Monitor 18 118,440 Both WCTs 2 2,900 Total. time for all batch releases ............. 29,728.0 Min.

Maximum time for a batch release ............... 1,264.0 Min.

Minimum time for a batch release .............. 33.0 Min.

Average time for a batch release .............. 464.5 Min.

3.3 Liquid Effluent Data The following Table 3.1 presents a quarterly summation of the total activity released and average concentration for all liquid effluents. It also presents the gross alpha activity released, volume of waste released and volume of dilution water used. Tables 3.2 and 3.3 are monthly summations of the same information in Table 3.1. Table 3.2 contains the quantity of the individual isotopes released to the unrestricted area for batch releases. Table 3.3 presents a monthly summation of gross radioactivity, tritium,ngross alpha and isotopic activity for the secondary blowdown and leakage releases. It also presents the monthly total volume for these releases and dilution volumes. Table 3.4 presents the doses from liquid effluents for each quarter and the calculated doses this year from liquid effluents.

Page 38 of 63

TABLE 3.1 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Summation of all Releases 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Fission and Activation Products Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) 1.729E-003 3.345E-003 3.297E-002 5.886E-003 Average Concentration (jiCi/ml) 1.573E-01 1 1.817E-011 2.022E-010 5.093E-0 11 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 3.832E+001 1.277E+002 8.428E+001 2.466E+001 Average Concentration (PtCi/ml) 3.487E-007 6.939E-007 5.168E-007 2.134E-007

% of Tech. Spec.

Limit(3.OE-3 gCi/ml) 1.162E-002 2.313E-002 1.723E-002 7.113E-003 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Average Concentration (gCi/ml) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000

% of Tech. Spec.

Limit(2.OE-4 RCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 o.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released Batch (liters) 1.772E+005 4.069E+005 7.270E+005 5.076E+005 Continuous (liters) 1.849E+007 2.271E+007 1.935E+007 1.537E+007 Total (liters) 1.867E+007 2.312E+007 2.008E+007 1.588E+007 Volume of Dilution Water Batch (liters) 1.927E+009 7.377E+009 1.469E+010 5.059E+009 Continuous (liters) 1.080E+01 1 1.767E+01 1 1.484E+01 1 1.105E+011 Total (liters) 1.099E+01 1 1.840E+01 1 1.631E+011 1.1 56E+0 11 Page 39 of 63

TABLE 3.2A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases January February March Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) 5.617E-004 7.527E-004 4.146E-004 1.729E-003 Avg. Cone.

(gCi/ml) 1.766E-009 6.045E-010 1.141E-009 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 1.648E+000 3.516E+001 1.510E+000 3.832E+001 Avg. Cone.

(jCi/ml) 5.182E-006 2.823E-005 4.157E-006 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(tCi/ml) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Avg. Cone.

(jtCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 3.1371E+004 1.132E+005 3.258E+004 1.772E+005 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 3.179E+008 1.245E+009 3.634E+008 1.927E+009 Page 40 of 63

TABLE 3.2A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases Isotope (Ci) January February March Total Ag-1 10m 1.237E-004 1.782E-004 1.3 1OE-004 4.329E-004 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Co-58 5.251E-005 2.008E-005 1.214E-005 8.473E-005 Co-60 2.032E-004 1.068E-004 9.045E-005 4.004E-004 Fe-55 8.469E-005 3.057E-004 8.797E-005 4.784E-004 H-3 1.648E+000 3.516E+001 1.5 1OE+000 3.832E+001 Mn-54 2.663E-005 0.000E+000 1.256E-005 3.918E-005 Nb-95 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 0.0003E+000 0.000E+000 Sb-125 7.092E-005 1.419E-004 8.0411E-005 2.933E-004 Sr-89 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Sr-90 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total 1.648E+000 3.516E+001 1.511E+000 3.832E+001 Page 41 of 63

-TABLE 3.2B Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases April May June Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) 6.182E-004 1.496E-003 1.231E-003 3.345E-003 Avg. Cone.

(tCi/ml) 7.410E-0 10 5.854E-010 3.086E-010 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 2.390E+000 8.428E+001 4.103E+001 1.277E+002 Avg. Cone.

. (j.tCi/ml) 2.865E-006 3.298E-005 1.029E-005 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(tCi/ml) 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci)

- 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(*tCi/ml) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 3.531E+004 2.080E+005 1.636E+005 4.069E+005 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 8.342E+008 2.550E+009 3.988E+009 7.377E+009 Page 42 of 63

TABLE 3.2B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases Isotope (Ci) April May June Total Ag-l 10m 1.415E-004 2.494E-005 3.168E-005 1.981E-004 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-60 5.056E-005 O.OOOE+000 1.105E-005 6.16 1E-005 Fe-55 2.048E-004 1.206E-003 9.491E-004 2.360E-003 H-3 2.390E+000 8.428E+001 4.103E+001 1.277E+002 Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Nb-95 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sb-125 2.213E-004 2.643E-004 2.390E-004 7.246E-004 Sr-89 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Sr-90 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Total 2.391 E+000 8.428E+001 4.103E+001 1.277E+002 Page 43 of 63

TABLE 3.2C Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases July August September Total

- Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) 7.132E-004 6.735E-005 3.21.9E-002 3.297E-002 Avg. Conc.

(1tCi/ml) 1.286E-010 1.787E-011 5.992E-009 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 2.425E+001 2.005E+001 3.997E+001 8.428E+001 Avg. Conc.

(iiCi/ml) 4.374E-006 5.322E-006 7.440E-006 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(JACi/ml) O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(.tCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 2.398E+005 1.449E+005 3.422E+005 7.270E+005 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 5.544E+009 3.768E+009 5.372E+009 1.469E+0 10 Page 44 of 63

TABLE 3.2C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases Isotope (Ci) July August September Total Ag-i lOm 7.846E-005 O.OOOE+000 4.065E-003 4.144E-003 Alpha 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 2.981E-004 2.981E-004 Co-58 3.937E-005 8.340E-006 3.889E-003 3.937E-003 Co-60 7.088E-005 O.OOOE+000 2.023E-002 2.031 E-002 Fe-55 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 H-3 2.425E+001 2.005E+001 3.997E+001 8.428E+001 Mn-54 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 2.803E-003 2.803E-003 Nb-95 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 1.589E-004 1.589E-004 Sb-125 5.245E-004 5.901E-005 7.435E-004 1.327E-003 Sr-89 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Sr-90 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Total 2.425E+001 2.005E+001 4.OOOE+001 8.431E+001 Page 45 of 63

TABLE 3.2D Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases October November December Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) 1.794E-003 1.919E-003 2.174E-003 5.886E-0.03 Avg. Cone.

(AtCi/ml) 1.724E-009 7.810E-010 1.391E-009 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 9.042E+000 1.21 1E+001 3.512E+000 2.466E+001 Avg. Conc.

([tCi/ml) 8.690E-006 4.930E-006 2.248E-006 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(gLCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(jICi/ml) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 1.739E+005 2.034E+005 1.304E+005 5.076E+005 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 1.040E+009 2.456E+009 1.562E+009 5.059E+009 Page 46 of 63

TABLE 3.2D (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Batch Releases Isotope (Ci) October November December Total Ag-110m 2.582E-004 2.385E-004 1.625E-004 6.591E-004 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 1.756E-004 1.446E-004 9.552E-005 4.157E-004 Co-60 5.709E-004 5.821E-005 3.525E-005 6.644E-004 Fe-55 6.954E-004 8.134E-004 5.215E-004 2.030E-003 H-3 9.042E+000 1.211E+001 3.512E+000 2.466E+001 Mn-54 6.038E-005 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 6.038E-005 Nb-95 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sb-125 3.364E-005 6.638E-004 1.359E-003 2.056E-003 Sr-89 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-90 O.OOOE+000 O.0OOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total 9.044E+000 1.211E+001 3.514E+000 2.467E+001 Page 47 of 63

TABLE 3.3A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases January February March Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000

Avg.Conc.

(jtCi/ml) 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Tritium Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

([tCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(gtCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(gtCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 6.195E+006 6.664E+006 5.633E+006 1.849E+007 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 4.348E+010 3.050E+010 3.399E+010 1.080E+01 1 Page 48 of 63

TABLE 3.3A (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases Isotope (Ci) January February March Total Ag-ilOm O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Alpha O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-60 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Fe-55 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 H-3 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Nb-95 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-89 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-90 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 49 of 63

TABLE 3.3B Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases Apri1 May June Toital Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(jtCi/ml) O.OO0E+OOO O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Tritium Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(R.Ci/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O0'OO0E+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Conc.

(1tCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+OOO O.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(jtCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 4.817E+006 1.254E+007 5.350E+006 2.271E+007 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 4.589E+010 6.972E+010 6.105E+010 1.767E+01 1 Page 50 of 63

TABLE 3.3B (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases Isotope (Ci) April May June Total Ag-110m O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-60 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Fe-55 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 H-3 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Nb-95 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sb-125 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-89 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-90 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 51 of 63

TABLE 3.3C Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases July August September Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(gtCi/ml). 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Tritium Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(JlCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O000 0.OOOE+000 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(tCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Avg. Cone.

(AtCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O000 O.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 8.123E+006 7.639E+066 3.589E+006 1.935E+007 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 7.693E+O 10 5.325E+010 1.820E+010 1.484E+01 1 Page 52 of 63

TABLE 3.3C (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases Isotope (Ci) July August September Total Ag-ll0m O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-57 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-60 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Fe-55 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 H-3 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 .. d Nb-95 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-89 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Sr-90 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Page 53 of 63

TABLE 3.3D Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases October November December Total Gross Radioactivity Total Release Excluding H3 and Dissolved Gases (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Avg. Cone.

(l+/-Ci/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Tritium Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+O00 Avg. Cone.

,, (gCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Dissolved Gases Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+OOO O.OOOE+O00 Avg. Cone.

(gCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+0OO Gross Alpha Activity Total Release (Ci) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Avg. Cone.

(gCi/ml) O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.OOOE+000 Volume of Waste Released (liters) 7.633E+006 5.236E+006 2.502E+006 1.537E+007 Volume of Dilution Water (liters) 4.561E+O10 3.302E+010 3.190E+010 1.105E+01 I Page 54 of 63

TABLE 3.3D (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Liquid Effluents - Continuous Releases Isotope (Ci) October November December Total Ag-1 10m. O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Alpha O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Co-57 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-58 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Co-60 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Fe-55 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 H-3 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.000E+000 Mn-54 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 O.OOOE+000 Nb-95 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Sb-125 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Sr-89 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 Sr-90 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 Total O.OOOE+000 O.OOOE+000 0.000E+000 0.OOOE+000 Page 55 of 63

Table 3.4 Annual Radioactive Effluent Report 2006 Dose From Liquid Effluents The dose to a member of the public from total liquid radioactive releases for each quarter was below the ODCM limits of 1.5 mrems to the total body and less than or equal to 5 mrems to any organ.

Additionally, the dose to a member of the public from total liquid radioactive releases for the year was below the ODCM limits of 3 mrems to the total body and less than or equal to 10 mrems to any organ.

Instantaneous release concentrations are limited by the individual radionuclide concentrations established in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, for unrestricted areas. During the report period, none of the isotopes released exceed the concentrations specified in Appendix B. The following offsite doses were calculated using equation 1.7 from the Kewaunee ODCM.

Organ Dose Quarterly Percent 1st Qtr Dose Total Limit of Limit mRem mRem Total Body 2.865E-004 1.5 1.910E-002 Bone 7.026E-006 5.0 1.405E-004 Liver 2.903E-004 5.0 5.8051E-003 Thyroid 2.792E-004 5.0 5.584E-003 Kidney 2.804E-004 5.0 5.607E-003 Lung 2.819E-004 5.0 5.638E-003 GI-LLI 3.440E-004 5.0 6.880E-003 Organ Dose Quarterly Percent 2nd Qtr Dose Total Limit of Limit mRem rnRem Total Body 7.377E-004 1.5 4.918E-002

, Bone 2.501 E-005 5.0 5.001E-004 Liver 7.506E-004 5.0 1.501E-002 Thyroid 7.332E-004 5.0 1.466E-002 Kidney 7.332E-004 5.0 1.466E-002 Lung 7.428E-004 5.0 1.486E-002 GI-LLI 7.481E-004 5.0 1.496E-002 Page 56 of 63

Table 3.4 (Con't)

Annual Radioactive Effluent Report 2006 Dose From Liquid Effluents Organ Dose Quarterly Percent 3rd Qtr Dose Total Limit of Limit mRem mRem Total Body 7.773E-004 1.5 5.182E-002 Bone 1.799E-006 5.0 3.598E-005 Liver 8.479E-004 5.0 1.696E-002 Thyroid 4.527E-004 5.0 9.054E-003 Kidney 5.344E-004 5.0 1.069E-002 Lung 4.528E-004 5.0 9.056E-003 GI-LLI 8.937E-003 5.0 1.787E-001 Organ Dose Quarterly Percent 4th Qtr Dose Total Limit of Limit mRem mRem Total Body 6.448E-004 1.5 4.299E-002 Bone 7.924E-005 5.0 1.585E-003 Liver 6.965E-004 5.0 1.393E-002 Thyroid 5.978E-004 5.0 1.196E-002 Kidney 6.071 E-004 5.0 1.214E-002 Lung 6.283E-004 5.0 1.257E-002 GI-LLI 9.815E-004 5.0 1.963E-002 Calculated Dose This Year Organ Dose Annual Total Limit of Limit mRem mRem Total Body 2.446E-003 3.0 8.154E-002 Bone 1.131 E-004 10.0 1.131E-003 Liver 2.585E-003 10.0 2.585E-002 Thyroid 2.063E-003 10.0 2.063E-002 Kidney 2. 155E-003 10.0 2.155E-002 Lung 2.106E-003 10.0 2.106E-002 GI-LLI 1.101E-002 10.0 1.101E-001 Page 57 of 63

4.0 UNPLANNED RELEASES No unplanned releases were made from the Kewaunee Power Station during the report period.

5.0 METEOROLOGICAL DATA Meteorological data for 2006 is retained on file at the Kewaunee Power Station. The data on file includes a continuous strip chart recording and a 15-minute interval listing of wind speed, wind direction and atmospheric stability. This is more conservative than the requirements of ODCM Section 3/4.6. See Appendix A for missing meteorological data and the joint frequency distribution tables.

6.0 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Table 6.1 is a summation of solid wastes shipped during 2006. Presented are the types of wastes, major nuclide composition, disposition of the wastes. Table 6.1 contains the radionuclide content (curies) and percent abundance for each type of waste.

Page 58of 63

Table 6.1 Annual Radioactive Effluent Report 2006 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL

1. Type of Waste

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottom None None

b. Dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc. None None

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. 2.60E-01 9.34E+01

d. Other None None

2. Estimate of Major Nuclide by Composition

a. Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottom Nuclide % Ci None N/A N/A

b. Dry Compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.

Nuclide % Ci Cr51 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Mn54 1.48E-02 3.85E-03 Co57 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Co58 5.05E-01 1.31E-01 Co60 3.71E-02 9.64E-03 Zr95 2.57E-03 6.67E-04 Nb95 8.94E-03 2.33E-03 Agl10m 9.44E-03 2.46E-03 Cs134 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Cs137 2.86E-04 7.45E-05 Sb 124 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Sb125 1.88E-03 4.89E-04 SnI 13 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Fe55 2.70E-01 7.03E-02 Fe59 8.79E-04 2.28E-04 C14 5.59E-04 1.45E-04 Ni59 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Tc99 6.51E-04 1.69E-04 1129 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Nb94 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Pu238 1.52E-06 3.96E-07 Page 59 of 63

Pu241 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 Am241 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 H3 1.98E-03 5.16E-04 Ni63 1.44E-01 3.76E-02 Sr90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ra226 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Sr89 0.60E+00 0.06E+00 Zn65 3.3 1E-04 8.62E-05 Agl08m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ba140 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cel41 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cm242 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cm243 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Pu239 4.82E-07 1.25E-07 Rul03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1133 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Zr97 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1135 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ce144 8.78E-04 2.28E-04 Nb97 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs138 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1131 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Sn117m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.00E+00 2.60E-01

c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc.

Nuclide Ci None N/A N/A

d. Other Nuclide Ci None N/A N/A

3. Solid Waste Disposition NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION 3 Highway RACE LLC Memphis, TN B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS NUMBER OF SHIPMENTS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION No irradiated fuel shipments were made from the Kewaunee Power Station during 2006.

Page 60 of 63

7.0 PROGRAM REVISIONS

-S In accordance with Technical Specifications 6.18.b.3 and 6.19.a, the revisions to the Process Control Program, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and radioactive waste treatment systems are listed below.

7.1 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) has been revised during this report period. (See Attachment B) 7.2 Major Changes to the Radioactive Liquid, Gaseous and Solid Waste Treatment Systems Major changes to the radioactive liquid, gaseous or solid waste systems are submitted in the annual Updated Final Safety Analysis Report consistent with Technical Specification 6.19.

On June 27, 2006 PORC approved NAD-1.16 "Solid Radioactive Waste Process Control Program (PCP) revision "G". As required by T.S. 6.19 the revision needs to be noted in the 2006 Annual Effluent Report. Changes were:

1) Deleted all text regarding site solidification process because the solidification system at KPS has been abandoned in place and is not used.

2) Deleted all text regarding Waste Evaporator Bottoms because this system also has been abandoned in place and is not used.

3) Other changes were editorial in nature.

Page 61 of 63

8.0 REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES 8.1 In the 2005Annual Effluent Release Report KPS described that the dose for certain waste gas decay tank releases were under reported due to not accounting for purges of the tanks. This occurred in releases from 2001 through 2005. The following pages show the quarterly and annual affects of increased release totals. The increases were determined by:

1. Reviewing the releases from waste gas decay tanks for the years 2001 through 2005 and identifying, which were purged. If there was no clear indication that the tank was purged, then purging was assumed.

2. For tanks that were purged the additional volume of the tank was added to the release volume to determine the corrected volume.

3. The ratio of the corrected volume to the original volume was determined

4. This ratio was used as a multiplier for the gamma whole body dose, the beta-skin dose and the ingestion pathway-organ dose to determine the total dose for each release.

5. The original doses for each release was subtracted from the corrected doses to determine the additional doses for each release.

6. The additional dose information was added to the quarterly and annual summary information provided in Table 2.4 of each year's Annual Effluent Release Reports.

7. The original, corrected and additional dose for each type, by quarter and for each year is reported in the attached pages. (See. Attachment C)

The largest change in Gamma Whole Body dose was in 2001. The additional dose was 1.605 E-6 mRads. The percent of the specification remained in the E-4 range of the allowable annual dose of 10 mRads.

The largest change in Beta-skin dose was also in 2001. The additional dose was 3.114 E-6 mRads.

The percent of the specification remained in the E-4 range of the allowable annual dose of 20 mRads.

The largest change in Ingestion Pathway-Organ dose was in 2005. The additional dose was 2.944 E-8 mRads. The percent of the specification remained in the E-3 range of the allowable annual dose of 15 mRads.

8.2 Per ODCM 3.1 Action b, "With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.1. Exert best efforts to return the instruments to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner."

The four liquid effluent monitors in service at KPS were each out of service greater than 30 days at some time during 2006. Some were returned to service shortly thereafter due to intervention, others remain out of service.

R-16 and R-20 have flow delivery issues that contributed to the high unavailability time. R-18 and R-19 have issue with non-linear response in the response region where the high alarms setpoints are Page 62 of 63

established. All four radiation monitoring channels have related non-linear response in the regions required to support certain aspects of the Emergency Action Levels (EAL) as described in the station EAL Classification charts.

Long term corrective action is in progress with project design/study phase completing mid-2007.

Station management expectations are to have the design change implemented during 2007. The design changes will be to address flow-monitoring issues associated with R-16 and R-20 and to address upper range expansion, or extended range capacity, for all four liquid monitors, R-16, R-18, R-19, and R-20.

R-16 Alternate flow calculations have determined minimum required flows are achievable and thus returned the radiation monitor channel to service. Long term expanded range capacity remains an issue.

R-18 The high alarm setpoints have been reduced to correspond with the linear response region. Long term expanded range capacity remains an issue.

R-19 The high alarm setpoints have been reduced to correspond with the linear response region. Long term expanded range capacity remains an issue.

R-20 Alternate flow calculations were unable to determine that minimum required flows are achievable and thus the radiation monitor channel remains out of service. Long term expanded range capacity remains an issue.

Page 63 of 63

Appendix A Kewaunee Power Station 2006 Meteorological Data Missing Data First Quarter: 5.75 hours8.680556e-4 days 0.0208 hours 1.240079e-4 weeks 2.85375e-5 months Second Quarter: 222.50 hours5.787037e-4 days 0.0139 hours 8.267196e-5 weeks 1.9025e-5 months Third Quarter: 123.50 hours5.787037e-4 days 0.0139 hours 8.267196e-5 weeks 1.9025e-5 months Fourth Quarter: 37.00 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months Note: A total of 388.75 hours8.680556e-4 days 0.0208 hours 1.240079e-4 weeks 2.85375e-5 months of data is missing or otherwise unavailable. This represents the availability of 95.55 % of the data for the year. Continuous strip chart indication for 2006 data is available onsite.

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 FIRST QUARTER 2006 Total Hours Missing = 5.75 Total Hours - 2160 Stability Class A Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 2.25 12.5 12.25 1.25 0 28.25 NNE 0 0 0.25 2.25 7.25 1.5 0 11.25 NE 0 0.25 2.25 19.75 8.75 1.75 0 32.75 ENE 0 0.5 0 17.75 19.5 5 0 42.75 E 0 0.25 0.75 4.25 20.25 19 0.25 44.75 ESE 0 0.25 0.25 8.25 3.75 0 0 12.5 SE 0 0.75 1.25 6 7.75 0 0 15.75 SSE 0 0.25 0.75 11 16.75 6.5 3.5 38.75 S 0 0 2.25 13.25 12.5 10.25 1.75 40 SSW 0 0 6 2.75 2.5 0 0 11.25 SW 0 0 2.5 1.5 3.25 0 0 7.25 WSW 0 0 1.5 3.25 13.25 0 0 18 W 0 1.5 8.25 13.5 17.75 5.75 1.75 48.5 WNW 0 0.25 6.5 17.25 31.75 6 0.25 62 NW 0 0.25 10.75 23.25 8.75 2.5 0 45.5 NNW 0 0 6.5 12.25 3 3.5 0 25.25 TOTAL 0 4.25 52 168.75 189 63 7.5 484.5 Stability Class B Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0.25 1 10.5 4.25 0 0 16 NNE 0 0 0 2 4.5 0.5 0 7 NE 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0.25 ENE 0 0 0 1 4.75 0 0 5.75 E 0 0 0 2 4.5 0 0 6.5 ESE 0 0 1.5 0.25 1375 0 0 3.5 SE 0 0 1.25 1.5 0.5 0 0 3.25 SSE 0 0 0.25 3 16.5 1.25 0 21 S 0" 0 1.75 1 0.25 0 0.75 3.75 SSW 0 0 3.25 2.5 0.25 0 0 6 SW 0 0 3.25 0 2 0 0 5.25 WSW 0 0 0 0.25 2.25 0 0 2.5 W 0 0 0.75 5.25 4.75 2.25 0 13 WNW 0 0 0.75 4.5 5.75 0.5 0 11.5 NW 0 0 0.75 3.25 4 0.25 0 8.25 NNW 0 0 2.5 7.25 6.25 0.75 0 16.75 TOTAL 0 0.25 17 44.25 62.25 5.75 0.75 130.25 Page A2 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class C Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 2.5 8.75 5 1.5 0 17.75 NNE 0 0.25 0 7 9.5 0 0 16.75 NE 0 0.25 0 2.5 0 0 0 2.75 ENE 0 0 0 2.75 0.75 0 0 3.5 E 0 0 0 3.5 0 0 0 3.5 ESE 0 1 1 3.25 0 0 0 5.25 SE 0 0 2.25 0.5 0.5 0 0 3.25 SSE 0 0 0.25 5.25 3.5 0.25 0 9.25 S 0 0.25 2 3.25 0 0.25 0 5.75 SSW 0 0 3.25 2.5 0.75 0.25 0 6.75 SW 0 0 3.25 0.75 2.75 0 0 6.75 WSW 0 0 1.25 0.75 2.5 1.25 0 5.75 W 0 0 4 8.25 3 2.25 0 17.5 WNW 0 0.5 2 6.5 6.75 0.25 0 16 NW 0 0 1.75 5 0.75 0 0 7.5 NNW 0 0 4.25 9 6.75 5.25 0 25.25 TOTAL 0 2.25 27.75 69.5 42.5 11.25 0 153.25 Stability Class D Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0.25 6.5 33 6 2 0 47.75 NNE 0 0 1.5 12.5 4.5 0.5 1.5 20.5 NE 0 0.25 1.25 2 2.5 0.25 0 6.25 ENE 0 0.25 0.25 2.5 7.75 0 0 10.75 E 0 1.25 2.75 1 2.5 0 0 7.5 ESE 0 4.25 3.5 1.5 3.75 1.25 0 14.25 SE 0 1.25 2.5 3.75 0.25 0..

0 7.75 SSE 0 1 4 17.5 10.75 0 0 33.25 S 0 0.25 7.5 9.5 3.25 2.25 0 22.75 SSW 0 0 10 33 6.25 0 0 49.25 SW 0 1.25 9.75 12.5 9.25 5.75 0 38.5 WSW 0 0.75 10.5 7.75 10.5 6 0 35.5.

W 0 0.5 11.5 27.25 28.5 6.75 0 74.5 WNW 0 0.25 12.75 20 30.75 4.75 0 68.5 NW 0 0.25 9.25 21.75 15.75 2.25 0 49.25 NNW 0 0 12 36 21.25 3.25 0 72.5 TOTAL 0 11.75 105.5 241.5 163.5 35 1.5 558.75 Page A3 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class E Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0.25 1.5 4.5 16.5 1.5 0.75 0 25 NNE 0 1.25 1.25 12.5 0 0 0 15 NE 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 ENE 0 1 0.5 4.5 0 0 0 6 E 0 1 0.75 4 0 0 0 5.75 ESE 0 1.25 1.75 2.5 0 0 0 5.5 SE 0 1 2.5 4 3 0 0 10.5 SSE 0 1.25 4.75 8 4.5 3 0 21.5 S 0 0.5 9.75 7 5 2 0.5 24.75 SSW 0 0.5 13.25 15.25 0 0 0

29 SW 0 1.25 10.5 11.75 6.25 0 0 29.75 WSW 0 2.25 10.5 13.5 22.5 4 0 52.75 W 0 1 9.25 31 12.5 1.75 0 55.5 WNW 0 1.5 15.25 28.5 7 1 0 53.25 NW 0 1.5 7.25 10.75 1.25 0 0 20.75 NNW 0 1.25 18.25 15.25 5 0 0 39.75 TOTAL 0.25 19 111 186 68.5 12.5 0.5 397.75 Stability Class F Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1 1.75 1.75 0 0 0 4.5 NNE 0 0.5 2.25 0.25 0 0 0 3 NE 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0.75 ENE 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 E 0 0.5 0.75 0 0 0 0 1.25 ESE 0 0.5 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 1 SE 0 0.5 3.75 0.75 0 0 0 5 SSE 0 0.25 3.75 1.5 1.5 0.5 0 7.5 S 0 1 6 5 0 0 0 12 SSW 0 1.5 10.25 2 0 0 0 13.75 SW 0 4.75 8 7.75 0 0 0 20.5 WSW 0 4 10 7.25 2.25 0 0 23.5 W 0 3.25 8 5.25 0.5 0. 0 17 WNW 0 0.75 9.25 21.5 0 0 0 31.5 NW 0 1.5 11.25 8.25 0 0 0 21 NNW 0 6.5 5 10.75 0 0 0 22.25 TOTAL 0 26.5 81.5 72.25 4.25 0.5 0 185 Page A4 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class G Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 2.25 6.75 2.5 0 0 0 11.5 NNE 0 0.25 0.75 0 0 0 0 1 NE 0 0.25 3 0 0 0 0 3.25 ENE 0 0.75 0 0.25 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0.75 ESE 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 .75 SE 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 SSE 0 0.75 8 3.75 0 0 0 12.5 5 0 1.25 10 4 0 0 0 15.25 SSW 0 2.75 22.5 0 0 0 0 25.25 SW 0 2.25 16.5 7 0 0 0 25.75 WSW 0 2.75 16.25 6.75 0 0 0 25.75 W 0 1 27.5 15.5 0 0 0 44 WNW 0 1.25 17.25 6 0 0 0 24.5 NW 0 2.75 22.75 2 0 0 0 27.5 NNW 0 6.25 19 0.25 0 0 0 25.5 TOTAL 0 25.25 171.5 48 0 0 0 244.75 Page A5 of Al 7

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 2 nd QUARTER 2006 Total Hours Missing = 222.5 Total Hours = 2184 Stability Class A Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0.5 0.5 6 24 3.75 0.75 0.25 35.75 NNE 0 0.5 1.75 35.25 48.5 2 0 88 NE 0 0 4.5 65.25 17.5 0 0 87.25 ENE 0 0 5 8 0.5 0 0 13.5 E 0 0 8.25 6.25 0 0 0 14.5 ESE 0 0 14 10.75 2.25 0 0 27 SE 0 0.25 9 7.5 0.5 0 0 17.25 SSE 0 0 8.5 8.25 9.5 1.5 1.75 29.5 S 0 0 2.5 11.25 5.75 0 0 19.5 SSW 0 0.25 3.25 6.25 0 0 0 9.75 SW 0 0 2 13 3.75 1.75 0.5 21 WSW 0 0 1 7.5 4.5 0.75 0 13.75 W 0 0 3.75 7.75 1.75 0 0 13.25 WNW 0 0 8.25 10 6.75 1.75 0 26.75 NW 0 0.25 11.5 12 3 1.5 0 28.25 NNW 0 0.25 11.75 15.25 3.75 4 0.5 35.5 TOTAL 0.5 2 101 248.25 111.75 14 3 480.5 Stability Class B Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0.25 1.25 2.5 1.75 1 0 6.75 NNE 0 0.25 2.25 8.25 10.75 1.25 0 22.75 NE 0 0 2.5 7.25 1 0.25 0 11 ENE 0 0 1 0.75 0 0 0 1.75 E 0 0 1.25 0.5 0 0 0 1.75 ESE 0 0 0.75 0 1.75 0.75 0 3.25 SE 0 0 2 2.5 0 0 0 4.5 SSE 0 0 1.5 2 0.75 0.25 0 4.5 S 0 0 0.25 9 2.5 0 0- 11.75 SSW 0 0 0 2.75 0 0 0 2.75 SW 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 1.25 WSW 0 0 1.25 0.25 0 0 0 1.5 W 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 0.75 WNW 0 0 1.75 2 1.75 0.25 0 5.75 NW 0 0.25 1.5 1.5 0.25 1.5 0 5 NNW .0" 0.25 1.25 2.75 1 0 0 5.25 TOTAL 0 1.25 18.75 42.75 21.5 5.75 0.25 90.25 Page A6 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class C Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1 2.75 2.75 2 1 0 9.5 NNE 0 0 2.25 14 15.25 2.5 0 34 NE 0 0.25 1 10.25 2.75 0 0 14.25 ENE 0 0 1.25 3.5 0.25 0 0 5 E 0 0 2.25 3 1.25 0 0 6.5 ESE 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 SE 0 0 2 4.75 0 0 0 6.75 SSE 0 0 1 2 0.25 0.5 0 3.75 S 0 0 0.25 4 0.5 0 0 4.75 SSW 0 0 0.25 4.25 0 0 0 4.5 SW 0 0 0.25 0.5 0 0.75 0 1.5 WSW 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.25 0 0 1.25 W 0 0 1 0.25 0.5 0.5 0 2.25 WNW 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0 0 1.5 NW 0 0 1.75 1.25 2 0 0 5 NNW 0 0 1.5 3.25 0 0 0 4.75 TOTAL 0 1.5 18.75 54.75 25.5 5.25 0 105.75 Stability Class D Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0.25 5.5 5.25 3.25 1.75 0 16 NNE 0 0.75 11.75 34 21.25 1.75 0 69.5 NE 0 0 9.5 26.5 3.5 0 0 39.5 ENE 0 1 6.25 10.75 3.25 0 0 21.25 E 0 1.25 10.25 4.25 0 0 0 15.75 ESE 0 1 6.75 4 0 0.25 0 12 SE 0 0.75 5.25 3.25 2.5 0 0 11.75 SSE 0 0.75 9.25 16 3.25 2.25 0 31.5 S 0 0.5 8 13 3.75 0 0 25.25 SSW 0 0.5 8.75 18.25 0 0 0 27.5 SW 0 0.5 2.25 1 0.25 2.5 0 6.5 WSW 0 0.25 6.25 3.75 1 1.5 0 12.75 W 0 0.25 5 2 0.75 1 0 9 WNW 0 0.25 6 8.5 2.25 0 0 17 NW 0 0.25 7.75 0.25 0.75 0 0 9 NNW 0 0 7 12.5 1.75 0 0 21.25 TOTAL 0 8.25 115.5 163.25 47.5 11 0 345.5 Page A7 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class E Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0.5 1.75 13.5 5.75 0.25 0 0 21.75 NNE 0 0.5 15.5 28 8 0 0 52 NE 0 3 19.75 16.5 1.75 0 0 41 ENE 0 1.25 16.25 5 0 0 0 22.5 E 0 1 19.5 5.25 0.25 0 0 26 ESE 0 4.25 11.75 2.25 0 0.25 0.25 18.75 SE 0 3.75 13 3.25 1.25 1.25 0.75 23.25 SSE 0 4 16.25 9.25 6.75 2 0 38.25 S 0 2.5 29.25 21.25 4 0 0 57 SSW 0 2.5 17 5.5 1.25 0 0 26.25 SW 0 4.25 3.25 2 0.25 5.5 4 19.25 WSW 0 2.75 4 2.25 0.75 0 2 11.75 W 0 3 4.75 3.75 0 0.25 0.25 12 WNW 0 1.75 5.5 4.75 0 0 0 12 NW 0 4.25 5.75 0.5 0 0 0 10.5 NNW 0 1.25 17.5 10 0.25 0 0 29 TOTAL 0.5 41.75 212.5 125.25 24.75 9.25 7.25 421.25 Stability Class F Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1 8.75 1.5 0.5 0 0 11.75 NNE 0 1 6 3 1 0.25 0 11.25 NE 0 2.25 11 9.5 1.25 0 0 24 ENE 0 1 7 1.25 0 0 0 9.25 E 0 1.25 5.25 0.25 0 0 0 6.75 ESE 0 0.75 5.5 0.75 0 0 0 7 SE 0 0.75 8 0.5 1 0.5 0 10.75 SSE 0 0.5 8.75 4.25 3.5 0 0 17 S 0 1.75 13.25 3.5 2 0.25 0 20.75 SSW 0 2.5 6 0.5 0 0 0 9 SW 0 0.25 9.25 2.25 0 1.25 3 16 WSW 0 0.75 7 2.5 0.75 0 0 11 W 0 4 4.25 5.25 0 0 0 13.5 WNW 0 2.5 6.25 2.5 0 0 0 11.25 NW 0 2.25 5.25 0.5 0.25 0 0 8.25 NNW 0 1.75 14 1.25 0 0 0 17 TOTAL 0 24.25 125.5 39.25 10.25 2.25 3 204.5 Page A8 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class G Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 6.5 5.25 3 0.5 0 0 0 15.25 NNE 0 3 1.25 0.5 0.25 0 0 5 NE 0 1.5 8 3.75 0 0 0 13.25 ENE 0 0.5 3.5 1 0.25 0 0 5.25 E 0 0.75 4.5 1.25 0 0 0 6.5 ESE 0 1 7.75 1 0.5 0 0 10.25 SE 0 1.5 12.75 2.5 0.75 0 0 17.5 SSE 0 2.75 17.75 25 8 0 0.25 53.75 S 0 3.5 19.75 13 0.5 0 0 36.75 SSW 0 7 6.5 3 0.25 0.5 0 17.25 SW 0 4.75 22 2 0 0 0 28.75 WSW 0 4.75 19 2.25 0 0 0 26 W 0 7 18.25 2.25 0 0 0 27.5 WNW 0 1.25 17.5 2 0 0 0 20.75

.NW 0 3.5 13.25 0 0 0 0 16.75 NNW 0 3.75 9.25 0.25 0 0 0 13.25 TOTAL 6.5 51.75 184 60.25 10.5 0.5 0.25 313.75 Page A9 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 3 'd QUARTER 2006 Total Hours Missing =123.5 Total Hours =2208 Stability Class A Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1.75 12.5 3.75 0 0 0 18 NNE 0 2.5 9.75 9.75 2.25 0 0 24.25 NE 0 0.25 10.5 37.25 42.25 4.75 0 95 ENE 0 0.25 4.5 43.25 2 0 0 50 E 0 0.5 3.75 25.75 2.5 0 0 32.5 ESE 0 0.25 4 13.25 0 0 0 17.5 SE 0 0.5 3 9.5 0 0 0 13 SSE 0 0 3 1.- 0 0 0 4 S 0 0.25 4.5 0.75 0 0 0 5.5 SSW 0 0.5 13.75 4.75 1.75 0 0 20.75 SW 0 0.75 10.25 10 6.75 0 0 27.75 WSW 0 0.5 4 2.5 0.25 0 0 7.25 W 0 0.25 3 0.75 0 0 0 4 WNW 0 1 9.5 4.75 0 0 0 15.25 NW 0 1.5 7.25 0 0 0 0 8.75 NNW 0 1.75 4.75 0.25 0 0 0 6.75 TOTAL 0 12.5 108 167.25 57.75 4.75 0 350.25 Stability Class B Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 3.75 3.25 0 0 0 7 NINE 0 0 5.75 2.75 0 0 0 8.5 NE 0 0 1.5 7.5 2.75 0 0 11.75 ENE 0 0 2.5 4 0 0 0 6.5 E 0 0 1 1.75 0 0 0 2.75 ESE 0 0 0.25 0.75 0 0 0 1

.SE 0 0.25 1 1.5 0 0 0 2.75 SSE 0 0 1.25 0.75 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 1.25 0 0 0 0 1.25 SSW 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0.25 SW 0 0 1.25 0.25 0 0 0 1.5 WSW 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 W 0 0 1.5 0.25 0 0 0 1.75 WNW 0 0.5 5.25 3 0 0 0 8.75 NW 0 0.5 8.5 0 0 0 0 9 NNW 0 0.75 2 0 0 0 0 2.75 TOTAL 0 2.25 37 25.75 2.75 0 0 67.75 Page A10 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class C Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 2.75 0.25 0 0 0 3 NNE 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 NE 0 0 2.75 8 2.25 0 0 13 ENE 0 0 0 4.75 0.25 0 0 5 E 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 ESE 0 0.25 0.75 1.25 0 0 0 2.25 SE 0 0 1.75 0.75 0 0 0 2.5 SSE 0 0 .1.25 0.25 0 0 0 1.5 S 0 0 0.5 0.25 0 0 0 0.75 SSW 0 0 1 0.25 0 0 0 1.25 SW 0 0.25 0.25 0.5 0 0 0 1 WSW 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 W 0 0 0.5 0.75 0 0 0 1.25 WNW 0 0.25 7 1.5 0 0 0 8.75 NW 0 1 2.25 0 0 0 0 3.25 NNW 0 0.5 1.75 0 0 0 0 2.25 TOTAL 0 2.25 25 22.5 2.5 0 0 52.25 Stability Class D Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1.5 5.75 0.25 0 0 7.5 NNE 0 2 14.75 5 0 0 21.75 NE 0 1 13 25.5 16.25 0.25 56 ENE 0 0.25 3.5 31 2 0 36.75 E 0 0 2 12.25 0 0 14.25 ESE 0 0.25 12.5 10.25 0.25 0 23.25 SE 0 0.25 4.75 4.75 0.5 0 10.25 SSE 0 0 10.75 23 3 0 36.75 S 0 0 3.75 2 0 0 5.75 SSW 0 0.75 3.5 0.75 0 0 5 SW 0 1.25 2 1.75 0 0 5 WSW 0 0.5 2.5 0 0 0 3 W 0 1 3.25 2.25 0 0 6.5 WNW 0 2 9 5 0 0 16 NW 0 1.5 4.75 1.75 0 0 8 NNW 0 1.5 4.75 0.75 0 0 7 TOTAL 0 13.75 100.5 126.25 22 0.25 262.75 Page All of Al7

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class E Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 2 3.5 0 0 0 0 5.5 NNE 0 3.75 6 4.5 0.25 0 0 14.5 NE 0 1.75 8.25 44.75 15.5 0.25 0 70.5 ENE 0 1 10 16.25 0 0 0 27.25 E 0 1.75* 13 14.75 1.25 0 0 30.75 ESE 0 3.5 32.25 12 1 0 0 48.75 SE 0 6 53 17.25 4 0 0 80.25 SSE 0 3.5 42.5 43.25 4.75 0 0 94 S 0 2.5 7 2 0.25 0 0 11.75 SSW 0 1.25 13.5 1.75 0 0 0 16.5 SW 0 0 6.25 0.5 0 0 0 6.75 WSW 0 0.75 3.5 0.25 0.25 0 0 4.75 W 0 0.25 9.75 1 0 0 0 11 WNW 0 0 6.25 0.25 0 0 0 6.5 NW 0 0.5 4 0 0 0 0 4.5 NNW 0 0.75 1.75 0 0 0 0 2.5 TOTAL 0 29.25 220.5 158.5 27.25 0.25 0 435.75 Stability Class F Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 5.5 3 0 0 0 0 8.5 NNE 0 2.75 8.5 1 0 0 0 12.25 NE 0 2 17.75 4.75 0 0 0 24.5 ENE 0 2 11.5 14.75 0 0 0 28.25 E 0 2 10.25 0 0 0 0 12.25 ESE 0 2.75 31.75 9.5 0.75 0 0 44.75 SE 0 2.75 62.5 23.75 4.5 0 0 93.5 SSE 0 2.25 40 11.75 6 1.5 0 61.5 S 0 2 5.75 0.75 0 0 0 8.5 SSW 0 1.75 2.5 0 0 0 0 4.25 SW 0 0.5 4 0 0 0 0 4.5 WSW 0 0 2.25 0 0 0' 0 2.25 W 0 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0.25 WNW 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 NW 0 0.75 0.5 0 0 0 0 1.25 NNW 0 0.75 0.5 0 0 0 0 1.25 TOTAL 0 28 201 66.25 11.25 1.5 0 308 Page A12 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class G Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0.5 9.75 5 0 0 0.25 0 15.5 NNE 0 13.5 16 0.5 0 0 0 30 NE 0 13 29.5 2 0 0 0 44.5 ENE 0 7 19.25 3.25 0 0 0 29.5 E 0 6 17.75 0.5 0 0 0 24.25 ESE 0 12.5 51.75 4 0 0 0 68.25 SE 0 27 86 50 3.25 0 0 166.25 SSE 0 19.25 42.75 27.25 6.5 0 0 95.75 S 0.25 13 9.75 0 0 0 0 23 SSW 0 12.25 5.5 0.25 0 0 0 18 SW 0.25 11.25 4.75 0 0 0 0 16.25 WSW 0.25 6.75 5 0 0 0 0 12 W 0 7.5 4.75 0 0 0 0 12.25 WNW 0.5 8.75 1.25 0 0 0 0 10.5 NW 4 13.25 7 0 0 0 0 24.25 NNW 1.25 12.75 3.5 0 0 0 0 17.5 TOTAL 7 193.5 309.5 87.75 9.75 0.25 0 607.75 Page A13 of Al7

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 4 th QUARTER 2006 Total Hours Missing = 37.00 Total Hours = 2184 Stability Class A Wind Direction CALM. 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0.75 13 8.25 8.5 4.25 0 34.75 NNE 0 0 6 16.25 5.5 0 0 27.75 NE 0 0 0.75 7.25 11 0.75 0 19.75 ENE 0 0.75 2.5 10 31.5 7.5 0 52.25 E 0 0.25 3.75 5 36.5 16.25 0 61.75 ESE 0 0.25 4.5 10 12.75 8.25 0 35.75 SE .0 0 3 5.75 24.75 11 0.75 45.25 SSE 0 0 16.5 10.75 7.25 .8.75 6.75 50 S 0 0.75 11.5 2 0.5 1.5 0 16.25 SSW 0 0.75 6.5 11.75 6 0 0 25 SW 0 2.25 6.75 6.75 2.5 0.75 0 19 WSW 0 1.75 5.75 9.75 5.5 0 0 22.75 W 0 1.5 7 19.5 8 0 0 36 WNW 0 0.5 11.5 23.5 12.5 0.75 0 48.75 NW 0 0 16 8.75 5 0.5 0 30.25 NNW 0 1 15.75 8.75 8.75 2 0 36.25 TOTAL 0 10.5 130.75 164 186.5 62.25 7.5 561.5 Stability Class B Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 0.5 0.25 0.25 1.75 0 2.75 NNE 0 0 2.25 2.5 1.5 0 0 6.25 NE 0 0 1.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0 4 ENE 0 0.25 1.75 4 1.5 0 0 7.5 E 0 0.25 0.25 0 5 4 0 9.5 ESE 0 0 0 1.75 0 0 0 175 SE 0 0.25 1 4.75 3 0 0 9 SSE 0 0 9.5 4.5 2.25 0 1 17.25 S 0 0 2.25 2.75 0.25 0 0 5.25 SSW 0 0 1.25 5.5 1.75 0 0 8.5 SW 0 0.25 1.25 4.5 1.75 0 0 7.75 WSW 0 0.25 1.75 4.25 0.25 0 0 6.5 W 0 0 2.5 7.75 4.75 0 0 15 WNW 0 0 2.25 8.75 1.25 0 0 12.25 NW 0 0.25 5 3.5 1.25 0 0 10 NNW 0 1-0 0.75 2 9.25 1.5 0 13.5 TOTAL 0 1.5 34 57e5 34.75 8 1 136.75 Page A14 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class C Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 0 0 1.25 1.25 0 0 2.5 NNE 0 0 1.5 4.75 1 0 0 7.25 NE- 0 0 1 1.75 0.5 0.5 0 3.75 ENE 0 0 1.25 3 2 0 0 6.25 E 0 0 0.5 5.75 4 1.5. 0 11.75 ESE 0 0 0.25 1.5 1.25 0 0 3 SE 0 0 2 5.75 4 0 0 11.75

ýSSE 0 0 9.5 4.5 3 0 1.25 18.25 5 0 0.25 1.75 3.25 0.5 0 0 5.75 SSW 0 0 4.25 7 1.5 0 0 12.75 SW 0 0 0.75 5 1.5 0 0 7.25 WSW 0 0.5 0.5 6 2.5 0 0 9.5 W 0 0 2.5 3.5 2.5 0 0 8.5 WNW 0 0 3.25 4.75 0.25 0 0 8.25 NW 0 0.5 4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 6 NNW 0 0.5 1 4.5 5.25 0 0 11.25 TOTAL 0 1.75 34 62.75 31.5 2.5 1.25 133.75 Stability Class D Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1.25 7.25 15.5 5 0 0 29 NNE 0 0.5 5 20.75 9.25 0 0 35.5 NE 0 0 12.25 1.75 2.5 1 0 17.5 ENE 0 0.25 10 11.75 7.75 0 0 29.75 E 0 1 1.75 9.25 11 1.75 0 24.75 ESE 0.25 1 4.75 7.25 5.25 1 0 19.5 SE 0 0.25 10.25 14 3.75 1.25 0 29.5 SSE 0 0.25 24.75 27.25 3.25 2.75 0.5 58.75 5 0 0.5 9.25 7.5 0 0 0 17.25.

SSW 0 0 11.25 10.5 0.25 0 0 22 SW 0 0.25 12.75 8 9.75 0 0 30.75 WSW 0 0 5 10.25 6 0 0 21.25 W 0 0.75 11.5 12.25 10.25 0.5 0 35.25 WNW 0 1 17.75 24.5 1 0 0 44.25 NW 0 0.25 13.75 15.25 9.75 0 0 39 NNW 0 0.5 5.5 15.75 1.75 0 0 23.5 TOTAL 0.25 7.75 162.75 211.5 86.5 8.25 0.5 477.5 Page A15 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class E Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0.25. 2.5 6.5 7.25 0 0 0 16.5 NNE 0 1 4.25 15.75 1.5 0 0 22.5 NE 0 3.25 15.25 6 1 0 0 25.5 ENE 0 4.75 8.5 7.5 1 0 0 21.75 E 0.25 2 4.75 1.25 0.5 0 0 8.75 ESE 0 3.75 1.25 1 0 0 0 6 SE 0.25 1 22 9 0 0 0 32.25 SSE 0 2.75 29.25 20.5 1.25 0.5 0 54.25 S 0 1.75 6.5 9.5 0 0 0 17.75 SSW 0 5.75 27.5 10 0.5 0 0 43.75 SW 0 4.25 10.75 12 8 0.25 0 35.25 WSW 0 3.5 8 4 4.25 0 0 19.75 W 0 1.25 5.75 7 5.25 0 0 19.25 WNW 0 0.25 14.5 1.25 0 0 0 16 NW 0 3 17.25 11.75 0 0 0 32 NNW 0 4.25 13.5 4.25 0 0 0 22 TOTAL 0.75 45 195.5 128 23.25 0.75 0 393.25 Stability Class F Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 2.5 5 0.5 0 0 0 8 NNE 0 3 6.5 0.25 0 0 0 9.75 NE 0 1.25 8.5 1 0 0 0 10.75 ENE 0 1.5 6.5 0 0 0 0 8 E 0 1.5 4 0 0 0 0 5.5 ESE 0 2.5 0.75 0 0 0 0 3.25 SE 0 3.5 7.25 3.25 0 0 0 14 3.75 0 0 0 .19.5 SSE 0 4 11.75 S 0 2 8.5 1 0 0 0 11.5 SSW 0 1.25 6.75 2 0 0 0 10 SW 0 0.5 10.5 1 0 0 0 12 WSW 0 1.75 8.25 4 0 0 0 .14 W 0 2 5.75 6.75 0 0 0 14.5 WNW 0 1.5 17 1 0 0 0* 19.5 NW 0 6 5.75 0 0 0 0 11.75 NNW 0 4.25 4.75 1.25 0 0 0 10.25 25.75 .0 0 0 182.25 TOTAL 0 39 117.5 Page A16 of A17

APPENDIX A Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2006 Stability Class G Wind Direction CALM 1-3 4-7 8-12 13-18 19-24 >24 TOTAL N 0 1 8.5 0 0 0 0 9.5 NNE 0 5 23 0 0 0 0 28 NE 0 2.75 30.75 0 0 0 0 33.5 ENE 0 2.25 21.25 0 0 0 0 23.5 E 0 1.25 1.25 0 0 0 0 2.5 ESE 0 1.5 1.5 0.75 0 0 0 3.75 SE 0 4.25 5.75 8.5 0 0 0 18.5 SSE 0 8 7.25 0.5 3.25 0 0 19 S 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 11 SSW 0 5.5 7 0 0 0 0 12.5 SW 0 5.75 8.5 0 0 0 0 14.25 WSW 0 6.25 12 0 0 0 0 18.25 W 0 7.75 11.25 0 0 0 0 19 WNW 0 11 4.75 0 0 0 0 15.75 NW 0 11.5 6.25 0 0 0 0 17.75 NNW 0 7.75 6.25 1.25 0 0 0 15.25 TOTAL 0 87.5 160.25 11 3.25 0 0 262 Page A17 of A17

Appendix B Kewaunee Power Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)

Revision 10 December 14, 2006

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)

Revision 10 December 14, 2006 Reviewed By: Tom Webb,ý"d Date: ZpI' Plant Operations Review Committee Approved By:.?LCvj 4s.M& J*ames M. Hale Date: %_1_l__

Manager, Ragiological Protection and Chemistry Approved By: 09*ANm- rn- Date: Z2-,/1- 04 Manager, Regulatory Affairs RECOMB DEC 1 4 2M6

Abstract This document has been developed in accordance with the commitment made by letter dated August 21, 1984 (from D.C. Hintz to S.A. Varga). It provides the current methodologies and parameters to be used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents and gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints for the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS). J. Stewart Bland Consultants, Inc. of Maryland was contracted to develop this document; however, rigorous review and final acceptance of this document has been provided by KPS. Implementation of this document is the responsibility of the current owner/operator of KPS.

REV. 10 12/14/2006

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Table of Contents Introd uction ................................................................ ;............................................................. 0-1 D efin itions .............................................................................................................................. 0-2 1.0 Liquid Effluent .................................................................... :......................................... 1-1 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................... 1-1 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination ................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown and Service W ater) ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values .................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits - 10CFR20 ............................................... 1-4 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculations - 10CFR50 .................................................... 1-5 1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ......................................................................... 1-7 1.6 Onsite Disposal of Low-Level Radioactively Contaminated Waste Streams ...... 1-8 1.7 Heating Boiler Blowdown Operation with Primary-to-Secondary Leak ............. 1-9 Figure 1 Liquid Radioactive Effluent Flow Diagram .................................... 1-10 Table 1.1 Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations .................... 1-11 Table 1.2 Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factors .......................... 1-12 Table 1.3 Bioaccumulation Factors (BFi) ......................... 1-14 2.0 G aseous Effluents .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls .......................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Waste Gas Holdup System ...................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Condenser Evacuation System ................................................................ 2-1 2.1.3 Containment Purge .................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.4 Auxiliary Building Vent ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.5 Containment Mini-Purge/Vent System .................................................... 2-2 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination .................... 2-2 2.2.1 Containment and Auxiliary Building Vent Monitor ................................ 2-2 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values .................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations - 10CFR20 .............. 2-4 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gas ................................................. 2-4 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates ....................... 2-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Table of Contents (con't) 2.4 Gaseous Effluent Dose Calculations - IOCFR50 ................................................ 2-6 2.4.1 Unrestricted Area Dose - Noble Gases ................................................... 2-6 2.4.2 Unrestricted Area Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates .......................... 2-7 2.5 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ....................................................................... 2-9 2.6 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards - 40CFR190 ........................... 2-10 2.7 Incineration of Radioactively Contaminated Oil ............................................. 2-10 2.8 T otal D ose ........................................................................................................ 2-10 Figure 2 Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Flow Diagram ............................... 2-12 Figure 3 Simplified Heating Boiler Fuel Oil Piping System ....................... 2-13 Table 2.1 Dose Factors for Noble Gases ...................................................... 2-14 Table 2.2 Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations .............. 2-15 Table 2.3 Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for D ose C alculations .......................................................................... 2-16 Table 2.4 Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT ................................ 2-17 Table 2.5 Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN .................................... 2-19 Table 2.6 Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD ................................... 2-21 Table 2.7 Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT ................................ 2-23 Table 2.8 Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT ................................ 2-25 Table 2.9 Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN ................................... 2-27 Table 2.10 Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD ............................... 2-29 Table 2.11 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT ....................... 2-31 Table 2.12 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN .......................... 2-33 Table 2.13 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD ........................ 2-35 Table 2.14 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT ..................... 2-37 Table 2.15 Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors ............................................ 2-39 3/4 Radiological Effluent Specifications and Surveillance Requirements ..................... 3-1 3/4.0 Applicability and Surveillance Requirements ..................................................... 3-1 3/4.1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation .................................. 3-2 3/4.2 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ................................ 3-3 ii REV. 10 12/14/2006

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL Table of Contents (con't) 3/4.3 Liquid Effluents ................................................................................................... 3-4 Concentration ...................................................................................................... 3-4 Dose .................................................................................................................. 3-5 Liquid Radwaste Treatment System ................................................................... 3-6 3/4.4 Gaseous Effluents ................................................................................................ 3-7 D ose R ate ............................................................................................................ 3-7 Dose-Noble Gases ............................................................................................... 3-9 Dose-Iodine-131, Iodine-133, Tritium and Radionuclides in Particulate Form 3-10 Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System ............................................................... 3-12 3/4.5 Total Dose ......................................................................................................... 3-14 3/4.6 Reporting Requirements .................................................................................... 3-16 Table 3.1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation .............. 3-17 Table 3.2 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation ............ 3-18 Table 4.0 Frequency Notation ......................................................................... 3-20 Table 4.1 Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements .................................................................................. 3-21 Table 4.2 Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Surveillance Requirements .............................................................. 3-22 Table 4.3 Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program ......... 3-23 Table 4.4 Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program ....... 3-25 Appendices Appendix A Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Liquid Radioactive Effluents . A-1 Table A-1 Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Drinking Water Pathways .... A-5 Table A-2 Adult Liver and Total Body Dose Assessment ............................. A-6 Appendix B Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Gaseous Radioactive Effluents .. B-1 Table B-I Effective Dose Factors - Noble Gases ....................................... B-5 Appendix C Evaluation of Conservative, Default Effective EC Value for Liquid Effluents . C-1 Table C-I Calculation of Effective EC (ECj)........................................... C-4 Site Maps ....................................................................................................... D-I Appendix D Figure D- 1 Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Release Points ................................ D-3 Appendix E Onsite Disposal of Low-Level Radioactively Contaminated Waste Streams .... E- 1 iii REV. 10 12/14/2006

KEWAUNEE POWER STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MVIANUAL Introduction The Kewaunee Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) describes the methodology and parameters used in:

1) The calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and

2) The calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates and cumulative quarterly and yearly doses.

The methodology stated in this manual is acceptable for use in demonstrating compliance with 10CFR20.1302, 10CFR50, Appendix I, and 40CFR190.

More conservative calculational methods and/or conditions (e.g., location and/or exposure pathways) expected to yield higher computed doses than appropriate for the maximally exposed person may be assumed in the dose evaluations.

The ODCM will be maintained at the station for use as a reference guide and training document of accepted methodologies and calculations. Changes will be made to the ODCM calculational methodologies and parameters as is deemed necessary to assure reasonable conservatism in keeping with the principles of 10CFR50.36a and Appendix I for demonstrating radioactive effluents are ALARA.

Rev. 10 0-1 12/14/2006

Definitions

1. ACTION ACTION shall be that part of a specification which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions.

2. GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting off-gases from the primary coolant system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity released to the environment.

3. INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE

a. CHANNEL CHECK

b. CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST

c. CHANNEL CALIBRATION

d. SOURCE CHECK As defined in the Technical Specifications.

4. MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC shall include all persons who are not occupationally associated with the plant. This category does not include employees of the utility, its contractors or vendors. Also excluded from this category are persons who enter the site to service equipment or to make deliveries. This category does include persons who use portions of the site for recreational, occupational, or other purposes not associated with the plant.

5. OPERABLE-OPERABILITY As defined in the Technical Specifications.

6. PURGE - PURGING PURGE or PURGING is the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other OPERATING condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

Rev. 10 0-2 12/14/2006

7. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING MANUAL (REMM)

The REMM shall contain the current methodology and parameters used in the conduct of the radiological environmental monitoring program.

8. SITE BOUNDARY, The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land is neither owned, nor leased, nor otherwise controlled by the licensee.

9. UNRESTRICTED AREA An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY access to which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional, and/or recreational purposes.

10. VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine or radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal and/or HEPA filters for the purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release to the environment. Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents. Engineered Safety Feature atmospheric cleanup systems (i.e., Auxiliary Building special ventilation, Shield Building ventilation, spent fuel pool ventilation) are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components.

Rev. 10 0-3 12/14/2006

. 1.0 Liquid Effluents 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls installed at Kewaunee for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, Criteria 60 and 64, are summarized as follows:

1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) - R- 18 provides this function on the liquid radwaste effluent line, R-19 on the Steam Generator blowdown.

2) Alarm (only) - R-20 and R-16 provide alarm functions for the Service Water discharges.

3) Composite Samples - Samples are collected weekly from the steam generator blowdown and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Samples are collected weekly from the Turbine Building Sump and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. The weekly samples are composited for monthly tritium and gross alpha analyses and for quarterly Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55 analyses. During periods of identified primary-to-secondary leakage (with the secondary activity > 1.0E-05 gtCi/ml), grab samples from the Turbine Building sump are collected daily and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

These samples are composited for monthly tritium and gross alpha analyses and for quarterly Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55 analyses.

4) Liquid Tank Controls - All radioactive liquid tanks are located inside the Auxiliary Building and contain the suitable confinement systems and drains to prevent direct, unmonitored release to the environment. A liquid radioactive waste flow diagram with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls is presented as Figure 1.

1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of Technical Specification 6.16.b.l.B and ODCM Specification 3.1, alarm setpoints shall be established for the liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to unrestricted areas shall be limited to ten times the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2, for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 tCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases). The following equation] must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions:

c_ IOxC(F+f) f (1.1)

Adapted from NUREG-0133 to include the application of 10 limes the Effluent Concentration (EC) of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2.

1-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

where:

1OxC = ten times the effluent concentration limit of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2, in [tCi/ml. For dissolved and entrained noble gases equals 2x 10-4 ptCi/ml.

c = the setpoint, in pCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, which is inversely proportional to the volumetric flow of the effluent line and proportional to the volumetric flow of the dilution stream plus the effluent stream, represents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.1.

f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below.

F = the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time.

[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), then (F + f) z F.]

1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors (Radwaste, Steam Generator Blowdown and Service Water)

The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Kewaunee Power Station are determined by the following equations:

sp C) + bkg (1.2)

Z C xRR lOxEC, where:

SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm)

Ci = the concentration of radionuclide "i" in the liquid effluent (RCi), to include gamma emitters only 10 x ECi = ten times the EC value corresponding to radionuclide "i" from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 (gCi/ml) 1-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

SENi = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated for radionuclide "i" (cpm per gCi/ml). The default calibration value from Table 1.1 may be used for gamma emitting radionuclides in lieu of nuclide specific values.

CW = the circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of release (gal/min)

RR = the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min) bkg = the background of the monitor (cpm)

The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the circulating water dilution is at its lowest. Reduction of the waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to meet the discharge criteria. At its lowest value, CW will equal RR and equation (1.2) reverts to the following equation:

SP < (C, xSEN). +bkg (1.3)

Ci (10x-EC,)

1.2.2 Conservative Default Values Non-gamma emitting radionuclides (H-3, Fe-55, Sr-89/90) are not detected by the effluent monitor and, therefore, are not directly included in the above setpoint equation. These non-gamma radionuclides can, however, contribute a sizable fraction of the total EC limit (refer to Appendix C). The method specified below for establishing default setpoints provides conservatism to account for these non-gamma emitters and ensures that the setpoint meets the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.1 including all radionuclides. Refer to Appendix C for further discussion.

Conservative alarm setpoints have been determined through the use of generic, default parameters. Table 1.1 summarizes all current default values in use for Kewaunee. They are based upon the following:

a) substitution of the default effective EC (EC,) value of 1.OE-06 gCi/ml (refer to Appendix C for justification),

where, ECe = Z-"Ci (1.4)

(ECi) 1-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

b) substitution of the lowest operational circulating water flow, in gal/min; and, c) substitution of the highest effluent release rate, in gal/min, -

d) substitution of the default monitor sensitivity.

The default setpoint equation is provided below:

SP ECxlOxSENxCW + bkg (1.5)

RR 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits - 10 CFR 20 ODCM Specification 3.3.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Circulating Water System) to less than ten times the concentrations as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2E-04 g.Ci/ml. Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. In the event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.1 may be performed using the following equation:

where:

][(Ci + (10x ECi))x (RR + CW)]_< 1 (1.6)

Ci = concentration of radionuclide "i" in the undiluted liquid effluent (jtCi/ml) 10 x ECi = ten times the EC value corresponding to radionuclide "i" from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 (4Ci/ml)

- 2E-04 tCi/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases RR - the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)

CW - the circulating water flow rate (dilution water flow) at the time of the release (gal/min) 1-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation - 10 CFR 50 ODCM Specification 3.3.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to members of the public from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from the Kewaunee Power Station to:

during any calendar quarter;

< 1.5 mrem to total body

< 5.0 mrem to any organ

° during any calendar year;

3.0 mrem to total body-

< 10.0 mrem to any organ.

Per Surveillance Requirement 4.3.2, the following calculational methods may be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Kewaunee.

Do= 1.6 7 E- 02 x VOL xZ (Ci x Aio) (1.7)

CW where:

Do = dose or dose commitment to organ "o", including total body (mrem)

Aio = site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ "o" for radionuclide "i" (mrem/hr per gCi/ml) (Table 1.2)

CQ = average concentration of radionuclide "i", in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (tCi/ml)

VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)

CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min) 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min) 1-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Ai0 ) are presented in Table 1.2 and have been derived in accordance with guidance of NUREG-0133 by the equation:

Ai0 = 1.14E + 05[(Uw + Dw)+(UFxBFi)]DFi (1.8) where:

ANo = composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ "o" of an adult for radionuclide "i", for the fish ingestion and water consumption pathways (mrem/hr per tCi/ml) 1.14E+05 = conversion factor (pCi/p.Ci x mi/kg + hr/yr)

Uw = adult water consumption (730 kg/yr)

Dw = dilution factor from the near field area within 1/4 mile of the release point to the nearest potable water intake for the adult water consumption (842, unitless)

UF = adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr)

BFi = bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide "i" in fish from Table 1.3 (pCi/kg per pCi/l)

DFi = dose conversion factor for nuclide "i" for adults in pre-selected organ "o", from Table E- 11 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, 1977 and NUREG 0172, 1977 (mrem/pCi)

The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.3.2 and Surveillance Requirement 4.3.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per Surveillance Requirement 4.3.1.1, Table 4.3.

Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the required minimum analysis frequency of Table 4.3.

In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculational equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.2. (Refer to Appendix A for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)

2Adapted from the Kewaunee Final Environmental Statement,Section V.

1-6 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Total Body DIb=9.67E + 03 x VOL xzC (1.9)

CW Maximum Organ Dax = 1.18E+04xVOL C (1.10)

I.-

CW where:

Ci = average concentration of radionuclide "i", in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (tCi/ml)

VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)

CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min)

Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem)

= conservatively evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem) 9.67E+03 = product of the hour-to-minute conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative total body dose conversion factor (Cs-134, total body

-- 5.79E+05 mrem/hr per ItCi/ml) 1.18E+04 = product of the hour-to-minute conversion factor (hr/min) and the conservative maximum organ dose conversion factor (Cs-134, liver

-- 7.09E+05 mrem/hr per gCi/ml) 1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ODCM Specification 3.3.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the quarterly projected doses exceed:

0.18 mrem to the total body, or

0.62 mrem to any organ.

The applicable liquid waste streams and processing systems are as delineated in Figure 1.

1-7 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Dose projections are made at least once per 31 days by the following equations:

Dtbp = DLb(91 +d) (0.11)

D.iap= Dnkx(91+d) (1.12) where:

Dtbp = the total body dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)

Dtb = the total body dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.7) or (1.9) (mrem)

Dftaxp = the maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)

Dmax = the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (1.7) or (1.10) (mrem) d = the number of days to date for current calendar quarter 91 = the number of days in a calendar quarter 1.6 Onsite Disposal of Low-Level Radioactively Contaminated Waste Streams During the normal operation of Kewaunee, the potential exists for in-plant process streams, which are not normally radioactive to become contaminated with very low levels of radioactive materials. These waste streams are normally separated from the radioactive streams. However, due mainly to infrequent, minor system leaks, and anticipated operational occurrences, the potential exists for these systems to become slightly contaminated. At Kewaunee, the secondary system demineralizer resins, the service water pretreatment system sludges, the make-up water system resins, and the sewage treatment plant sludges are waste streams that have the potential to become contaminated at very low levels. During the yearly testing of a batch of pre-treatment sludge, it was found that approximately 15,000 cubic feet of sludge had been contaminated with Cs-137 and Co-60.

The potential radiation doses to members of the public from these onsite disposal methods are well below 1 mrem per year. This dose is in keeping with the guidelines of the National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) in their Report No. 91, in which the NCRP established a "negligible individual risk level" at a dose rate of I mrem per year.

1-8 REV. 10 12/14/2006

It is for these type 'wastes that the NRC acknowledged in Information Notice No. 83-05 and 88-22 that the levels of radioactive material are so low that control and disposal as a radwaste are not warranted. The potential risks to man are negligible and the disposal costs as a radwaste are unwarranted and costly.

This waste material will be monitored and evaluated prior to disposal to ensure its radioactive material content is negligible. It shall then be disposed of in a normal conventional manner with records being maintained of all materials disposed of using these methods.

Approvals for specific alternate disposal methods are listed in Appendix E. Currently, only service water pretreatment (SWPT) facility lagoon sludge and sewage treatment plant sludge have been approved for disposal by land spreading.

1.7 Heating Boiler Blowdown Operation with Primary-to-Secondary Leak During operation with a primary-to-secondary leak, the potential exists for non-radioactive systems to become contaminated. One such system is the heating system. Activity is transferred from the reactor coolant system into the secondary main steam system through the leak and then into the heating system. Heating boiler operation following operation with a primary-to-secondary leak will result in the heating boiler becoming contaminated.

When the heating boiler is operated, it must be periodically blown down to remove impurities, which collect in the system. This blowdown is normally directed to the steam generator blowdown tank but can be diverted to the circulating water discharge. Either way, the blowdown becomes a release path for radioactivity to the environment. The heating boiler blowdown is sampled, using current plant procedures, whenever the primary-to-secondary leakage exceeds 10 gallons per day and the gross gamma activity or tritium activity exceeds 1.OE-05 jgtCi/ml. The results of these samples allow for the activity being released to the environment to be quantified. This is similar to the method used for the turbine building sump release path. The radioactive effluent limits of 10 CFR Part 20, 40 CFR 190, and Technical Specifications can therefore be maintained.

1-9 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Figure 1 Liquid Radioactive Effluent Flow Diagram T~sbo eu~adcqF-gp j 84rWBiIrg17SPTL o MImae" OS-frp

',Jl "~,11 RxcUmr. knkjt- ~.9 chn9) 51"mId~ CIW" A NIoWo00r,

/Skxzge o tD III I w Tenk 7swtTA Aumb" aAmw SWndpos

LAIM LLý mt"W K'KJ4LN COCUMFY3.O 1-10 REV. 10 12/14/2006 IL L - I I I - L IL . f. , I L 1, - - I, I - L IL

Table 1.1 Parameters for Liquid Alarm Setpoint Determinations Parameter Actual Value Default Value* Units Comments ECe calculated I.OE-06** jiCi/ml Calculate for each batch to be released Ci measured N/A RCi/ml ITaken from gamma spectral analysis of m r/i liquid effluent EC, as determined N/A gCi/mI Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, E___adetemine N/A____ __ti/ml Table 2, Col. 2 Sensitivity (SEN)

R-18 as determined 1.OE+08 Radwaste effluent R-19 as determined I .0E+08 cpm per Steam Generator blowdown R-20 as determined 1.OE+08 tCi/mi Service Water - component cooling R-1 6 as determined 9.8E1+07 Service Water - Containment fan cooling CW as determined 2.58E+05 gpm Circulating Water System default =

winter, single CW pump Release Rate (RR)

R-18 as determined 8.OE+01 Determined prior to release; release rate can be adjusted for Technical Specification compliance h6.

R-19 as determined 2.OE+02 gpm Steam Generator A and B combined R-20 as determined 5.OE+03 Service Water -component cooling R-16 as determined I.5E+03 Service Water - Containment fan cooling Background (bkg)

R-18 as determined 2.OE+03 cpm Nominal values only; actual values may R-19 as determined 8.OE+01 be used in lieu of these reference values R-20 as determined 6.OE+01 R-16 as determined 8.OE+01 R-t8.Ot.(SP)

Setpoint* calculated 5.00E+05 + bkg cpm Default alarm setpoints; more I- R-19 .... calculated 5.OOE+05 + bkg conservative values may be used as deem appropriate and desirable for assuring I

R-20 calculated 5.1 6E+04 + bkg

+ bkg regulatory compliance and for R-16 calculated 1.69E+05 + bkg maintaining releases ALARA.

Setpoint* (SP) with no Circulating Water System flow, CW=0 R-18 calculated 6.25E+04+ bkg For outages with no Circulating Water R-19 calculated 2.50E+04 + bkg System flow (CW--0) and a dilution flow R-20 calculated 1.001E+03'+ bkg cpr as provided by the Service Water system R-16 calculated 3.26E+03 + bkg of 5,000 gpm total.***

Refer to Calculation # C10690 for the default setpoint calculation.

- Refer to Appendix C for derivation

- - b SW flow is based on N-SW-02 Operating Parameters and Service Water Pump Flow Curves.

The default alarm setpoints for R-18 and R-19 are based upon the linear calibration range of those radiation monitors in accordance with CAP 37265 and DCR 26981.

1-11 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 1.2 Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factors (mrem/hr per gCi/mi)

Nuclide Bone Liver T.Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI H-3 - 3.30E-1 3.30E-1 3.30E-1 3.30E-1 3.30E-1 3.30E-1 C-14 3.13E+4 6.26E+3 6.26E+3 6.26E+3 6.26E+3 6.26E+3 6.26E+3 Na-24 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 4.09E+2 P-32 1.39E+6 8.62E+4 5.36E+4 . - 1.56E+5 Cr-51 - 1.28E+0 7.63E-1 2.81 E-1 1.69E+0 3.21 E+2 Mn-54 - 4.38E+3 8.36E+2 - 1.30E+3 - 1.34E+4 Mn-56 - 1.10E+2 1.96E+1 - 1.40E+2 - 3.52E+3 Fe-55 6.61 E+2 4.57E+2 1.06E+2 - 2.55E+2 2.62E+2 Fe-59 1.04E+3 2.45E+3 9.40E+2 - 6.85E+2 8.17E+3 Co-57 2.11E+1 3.51E+1 - - 5.36E+2 Co-58 - 8.99E+1 2.02E+2 .- 1.82E+3 Co-60 2.58E+2 5.70E+2 - - - 4.85E+3 Ni-63 3.13E+4 2.17E+3 1.05E+3 - - - 4.52E+2 Ni-65 1.27E+2 1.65E+1 7.52E+O - - 4.18E+2 Cu-64 1.01 E+1 4.72E+O - 2.53E+1 - 8.57E+2 Zn-65 2.32E+4 7.38E+4 3.33E+4 - 4.93E+4 - 4.65E+4 Zn-69 4.93E+1 9.43E+1 6.56E+0 - 6.13E+1 - 1.42E+1 Br-82 - - 2.27E+3 - - 2.61 E+3 Br-83 - - 4.05E+1 - -- 5.83E+1 Br-84 - - 5.24E+1 - - 4.12E-4 Br-85 - - 2.15E+0 - -

Rb-86 - 1.01 E+5 4.71E+4 - - 1.99E+4 Rb-88 - 2.90E+2 1.54E+2 4.OOE-9 Rb-89 - 1.92E+2 1.35E+2 Sr-89 2.24E+4 - 6.44E+2 3.60E+3 Sr-90 5.52E+5 - 1.35E+5 - 1.59E+4 Sr-91 4.13E+2 - 1.67E+1 - - 1.97E+3 Sr-92 1.57E+2 - 6.77E+0 - - 3.10E+3 Y-90 5.85E-1 - 1.57E-2 - - 6.21E+3 Y-91m 5.53E-3 - 2.14E-4 - - - 1.62E-2 Y-91 8.58E+O - 2.29E-1 - - 4.72E+3 Y-92 5.14E-2 - 1.50E-3 - - 9.OOE+2 Y-93 1.63E-1 - 4.50E-3 - - 5.17E+3 Zr-95 2.70E-1 8.67E-2 5.87E-2 - 1.36E-1 - 2.75E+2 Zr-97 1.49E-2 3.01 E-3 1.38E-3 - 4.55E-3 - 9.34E+2 Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 - 2.46E+2 - 1.51 E+6 Nb-97 3.75E+O 9.48E-1 3.46E-1 - 1.11 E+0 - 3.50E+3 Mo-99 - 1.07E+2 2.04E+1 - 2.43E+2 - 2.49E+2 Tc-99m 9.11E-3 2.58E-2 3.28E-1 - 3.91 E-1 1.26E-2 1.52E+1 Tc-101 9.37E-3 1.35E-2 1.32E-1 - 2.43E-1 6.90E-3 -

Ru-103 4.61 E+0 1.99E+0 - 1.76E+1 5.39E+2 Ru-105 3.84E-1 1.52E-1 - 4.96E+O 2.35E+2 Ru-106 6.86E+1 8.68E+O - 1.32E+2 4.44E+3 Rh-103m - -

Rh-106 -

1-12 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 1.2 Site Related Ingestion Dose Commitment Factors (mremrhr per ILCi/ml)

Nuclide Bone Liver T.Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI Ag-110rn 1.04E+0 9.62E-1 5.71 E-1 1.89E+O - 3.92E+2 Sb-124 9.48E+0 1.79E-1 3.76E+0 2.30E-2 - 7.38E+0 2.69E+2 Sb-125 6.06E+0 6.77E-2 1.44E+O 6.16E-3 - 4.67E+0 6.67E+1 Te-125m 2.57E+3 9.31 E+2 3.44E+2 7.73E+2 1.04E+4 - 1.03E+4 Te-127m 6.49E+3 2.32E+3 7.91E+2 1.66E+3 2.64E+4 - 2.18E+4 Te-127 1.05E+2 3.79E+1 2.28E+1 7.81E+1 4.29E+2 - 8.32E+3 Te-129m 1.10E+4 4.11E+3 1.74E+3 3.79E+3 4.60E+4 - 5.55E+4 Te-129 3.01E+1 1.13E+1 7.33E+0 2.31E+1 1.27E+2 - 2.27E+1 Te-131m 1.66E+3 8.11E+2 6.76E+2 1.28E+3 8.22E+3 - 8.05E+4 Te-131 1.89E+1 7.89E+O 5.96E+0 1.55E+1 8.27E+1 - 2.67E+0 Te-1 32 2.42E+3 1.56E+3 1.47E+3 1.73E+3 1.50E+4 - 7.39E+4 1-130 2.79E+1 8.23E+1 3.25E+1 6.97E+3 1.28E+2 - 7.08E+1 1-131 1.54E+2 2.20E+2 1.26E+2 7.20E+4 3.76E+2 - 5.79E+1 1-132 7.49E+0 2.OOE+1 7.01E+0 7.01E+2 3.19E+1 - 3.76E+O 1-133 5.24E+1 9.11E+1 2.78E+1 1.34E+4 1.59E+2 - 8.19E+1 1-134 3.91E+O 1.06E+1 3.80E+0 1.84E+2 1.69E+1 - 9.26E-3 1-135 1.63E+1 4.28E+1 1.58E+1 2.82E+3 6.86E+1 - 4.83E+1 Cs-134 2.98E+5 7.09E+5 5.79E+5 2.29E+5 7.61 E+4 1.24E+4 Cs-136 3.12E+4 1.23E+5 8.86E+4 6.85E+4 9.39E+3 1.40E+4 Cs-137 3.82E+5 5.22E+5 3.42E+5 1.77E+5 5.89E+4 1.01 E+4 Cs-138 2.64E+2 5.22E+2 2.59E+2 - 3.84E+2 3.79E+1 2.23E-3 Ba-139 1.02E+O 7.30E-4 3.00E-2 - 6.83E-4 4.14E-4 1.82E+0 Ba-140 2.15E+2 2.69E-1 1.41E+1 - 9.16E-2 1.54E-1 4.42E+2 Ba-141 4.98E-1 3.76E-4 1.68E-2 - 3.50E-4 2.13E-4 Ba-142 2.25E-1 2.31E-4 1.42E-2 - 1.95E-4 1.31 E-4 -

La-140 1.52E-1 7.67E-2 2.03E-2 - - - 5.63E+3 La-142 7.79E-3 3.54E-3 8.82E-4 - - 2.59E+1 Ce-141 3.17E-2 2.14E-2 2.43E-3 - 9.95E-3 - 8.19E+1 Ce-143 5.58E-3 4.13E+0 4.57E-4 - 1.82E-3 - 1.54E+2 Ce-144 1.65E+O 6.90E-1 8.87E-2 - 4.10E-1 - 5.58E+2 Pr-143 5.60E-1 2.25E-1 2.77E-2 - 1.30E-1 2.45E+3 Pr-144 1.83E-3 7.61E-4 9.31E-5 - 4.29E-4 - -

Nd-147 3.83E-1 4.42E-1 2.65E-2 2.59E-1 - 2.12E+3 W-187 2.96E+2 2.47E+2 8.65E+1 - 8.10E+4 Np-239 2.97E-2 2.92E-3 1.61E-3 9.10E-3 - 5.98E+-2 1-13 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 1.3 Bloaccumulatlon Factors(BFI)

(pCi/kg per pCVllter)*

Element Freshwater Fish H 9.OE-01 C 4.6E+03 Na 1.OE+02 P 3.OE+03 Cr 2.OE+02 Mn 4.OE+02 Fe 1.OE+02 Co 5.OE+01 Ni 1.OE+02 Cu 5.OE+01 Zn 2.OE+03 Br 4.2E+02 Rb 2.OE+03 Sr 3.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01 Zr 3.3E+00 Nb 3.OE+04 Mo 1.OE+01 Tc 1.5E+01 Ru 1.OE+01 Rh 1.OE+01 Ag 2.3E+00 Sb 1.OE+00 Te 4.OE+02 I 1.5E+01 Cs 2.OE+03 Ba 4.OE+00 La 2.5E+01 Ce 1.OE+00 Pr 2.5E+01 Nd 2.5E+01 W 1.2E+03 Np 1.OE+01 Values in this Table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus which is adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver and antimony which are taken from UCRL 50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.

1-14 REV. 10 12/14/2006

2.0 Gaseous Effluents 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Kewaunee for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, Criteria 60 and 64, are summarized as follows:

2.1.1 Waste Gas Holdup System The vent header gases are collected by the waste gas holdup system. Gases may be recycled to provide cover gas for the CVCS hold-up tanks or held in the waste gas tanks for decay prior to release. Waste gas decay tanks are batch released after sampling and analysis. The tanks are discharged via the Auxiliary Building vent. R-13 and/or R-14 provide noble gas monitoring and automatic isolation.

2.1.2 Condenser Evacuation System The air ejector discharge is monitored by R-15. Releases from this system are normally via the Auxiliary Building vent and are monitored by R-13 and/or R-14.

2.1.3 Containment Purge Containment purge and ventilation is via the containment stack for the 36-inch RBV system but via the auxiliary building stack for the 2-inch vent and mini-purge blower system. The stack radiation monitoring system consists of:

a noble gas activity monitor providing alarm and automatic termination of release (R-12 and R-21),

9 an iodine sampler, and 0 a particulate sampler.

Effluent flow rates are determined empirically as a function of fan operation (fan curves)?

Sampler flow rates-are determined by flow rate instrumentation.

2.1.4 Auxiliary Building Vent The Auxiliary Building vent receives discharges from the waste gas holdup system, condenser evacuation system, fuel storage area ventilation, Auxiliary Building radwaste processing area ventilation, 2-inch containment pressure relief purge/vent system, and Auxiliary Building general area. All effluents pass through the R- 13 and/or R-14 channels which contain:

_ a noble gas monitor, e an iodine sampler, and 0 a particulate sampler.

2-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

The noble gas monitor provides auto isolation of any waste gas decay tank release and diverts other releases through the special ventilation system. Effluent flow rates are determined by installed flow measurement equipment or as a function of fan operation (fan curves). Sampler flow rates are determined by flow rate instrumentation. -.

2.1.5 Containment Mini-Purge/Vent System Slight pressure buildup in containment is a recurring event resulting from normal operation of the plant. Prior to exceeding 2 psig in containment, this excess pressure is vented off. Air from containment is routed to the Auxiliary Building ventilation system, via the post-LOCA hydrogen recombiner piping and then out through the Auxiliary Building vent stack. The system is also designed to allow a continuous supply of fresh air to be introduced into containment via a mini-blower to purge gases. An alarm of the Auxiliary Building vent stack monitor (R-13 or R-14) or the containment building airborne radioactivity monitors (R-11, R-12) provides automatic isolation.

2.1.6 Steam Generator PORV Release With Primary-to-Secondary Leakage IF the plant is operating with Steam Generator leakage from the primary side to the secondary, THEN release of steam through the Steam Generator PORVs will constitute a radiological release. There are no monitors on this release path. so accurate data collection is important. The appropriate procedures provide directions for release permit preparations.

2.1.7 Non-rouline Discharge Locations Periodically. non-routine breaches are made in the Auxiliary and Containment buildings that mighi allow the release of the atmosphere, which contains some levels of radioactivity. These breaches include, but are not limited to, opening the Containment equipment hatch during outages, holes cut in walls or ceilings to allow for moving equipment in or out of the Radiologically Controlled Areas (RCAs). All efforts to maintain these areas at negative pressure will he made. IF negative pressure cannot be maintained (i.e., more exhaust than supply fan volume). THEN supply ventilation to the area must be secured. Criteria for determining if and when a release occurs firom these areas is provided in implementing procedures. As possible. the effects of these possible releases shall be evaluated before hand. Any actual releases shall be documened and included in the monthly. (juarterly and annual reports as appropriate.

A gaseous radioactive waste flow diagram with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls is presented as Figure 2.

2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor S etpoint Determination 2.2.1 Containment and Auxiliary Building Vent Monitor Per the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.2, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases does not exceed corresponding dose rate at the site boundary of 500 mrem/year to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin. Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., grab sample of the Containment vent or Auxiliary Building vent), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be established by the following calculational method:

2-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-d

FRACtb = [4.72E + 02x X/Q x VFx E (Ci x Ki)]> 500 (2.1)

FRAC.ki. = [4.72E + 02x XI/Qx VFx * (Ci x (L1 + 1. M))]+ 3000 (2.2) where:

FRACtb = fraction of the allowable release rate for the total body based on the identified radionuclide concentrations and the release flow rate FRACskin = fraction of the allowable release rate for skin based on the identified radionuclide concentrations and the release flow rate X/Q = annual average meteorological dispersion for direct exposure to noble gas at the controlling site boundary location (sec/m 3, from Table 2.3)

VF = ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (fW/min, from Table 2.3)

Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide "i" as determined by radioanalysis of grab sample (pCi/cm3)

= total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrem/yr per pCi/m 3, from Table 2.1)

= beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrem/yr per tCi/m3, from Table 2.1)

= gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrad/yr per g.Ci/m 3, from Table 2.1) 1.1 = mirem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 4.72E+02 = conversion factor (cm 3 /ft3 x min/sec) 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr) 3000 = skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr)

Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher value) as determined above, the alarm setpoint for the Containment and Auxiliary Building vent monitors at Kewaunee may be calculated:

SP = [*Z(CixSENi)-+ FRAC]+ bkg (2.3) where:.

SP = alarm setpoint cor'responding to the maximum allowable release rate (cpm) 2-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

SENi = the sensitivity value to which the monitor is calibrated for radionuclide "i" (cpm per jiCi/cm 3 ), use the default value from Table 2.2 if radionuclide specific sensitivities are not available bkg = background of the monitor (cpm) 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2.2. These values are based upon:

a) substitution of the maximum ventilation flow rate, b) substitution of a radionuclide distribution 3 comprised of 95% Xe-133, 2%

Xe-135, 1% Xe-133m, 1% Kr-88 and 1% Kr-85; and, c) application of an administrative multiplier of 0.5 to conservatively assure that any simultaneous releases do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate.

For this radionuclide distribution, the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate. The resulting conservative, default setpoints are presented in Table 2.2.

2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations - 10 CFR 20 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gases.

ODCM Specification 3.4.1.a limits the dose rate at the site boundary due to noble gas releases to < 500 mrem/yr to the total body, and < 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. In the event any gaseous releases from the station results in the alarm setpoints being exceeded, an evaluation of the unrestricted area dose rate resulting from the release may be performed using the following equations:

Dtb =x/Qx KixQiJ (2.4) and D., = X/Q x -:((Li + 1.1Mi)XQi, (2.5)

Adopted from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, Source Term Specifications, Table 6.

2-4 REV. 10 .-d 12/14/2006

where:

D Lb = total body dose rate (mrem/yr)

D, = skin dose rate (mrem/yr) x/Q = atmospheric dispersion for direct exposure to noble gas at the controlling site boundary (sec/m 3, from Table 2.3)

Q i = average release rate of radionuclide "i" over the release period under evaluation (pCi/sec)

Ki= total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrem/yr per jtCi/m 3 , from Table 2.1)

Li= beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrem/yr per IICi/m 3 , from Table 2.1)

Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrad/yr per giCi/m 3, from Table 2.1) 1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad)

Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2.3 may be used for evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.

2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates ODCM Specification 3.4.1.b limits the dose rate to < 1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period for continuous releases (e.g.,

nominally once per 7 days) and for batch releases on the time period over which any batch release is to occur. The following equation may be used for the dose rate evaluation:

D0 = Qx-(RxQ,) (2.6) where:

Do = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr) 2-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary for the inhalation pathway (sec/m 3, from Table 2.3)

Ri = dose parameter for radionuclide "i", (mrem/yr per gCi/m3 ) for the child inhalation pathway from Table 2.6 Qi = average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis frequency. for radionuclide i, 1-131, 1-133, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (tCi/sec)

By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for Do solving forQi, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (see Table 2.3) and the most limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation pathway, child thyroid - Ri = 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per gCi/m3 ) the allowable release rate for 1-131 is --

6.43 [tCi/sec. An added conservatism factor of 0.25 has been included in this calculation to account for any potential dose contribution from other radioactive particulate material.

For a 7-day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for 1-13 1, the

cumulative allowable release is 3.9 Ci. Therefore, as long as the 1-131 releases in any 7-day period do not exceed 3.9 Ci, no additional analyses are needed to verify compliance with the ODCM Specification 3.4.1.b limits on allowable release rate.

2.4 Gaseous Effluent Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 2.4.1 Unrestricted Area Dose - Noble Gases ODCM Specification 3.4.2 requires a periodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limits of(5 5 mrad, gamma-air and < 10 mrad, beta-air) and the calendar year limits (< 10 mrad, gamma-air and <20 mrad, beta-air). The following equations may be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses:

D 7 = 3.17E-08x xIQ x (Mix Q.) (2.7) and DA = 3.17E- 08 x X/Qx Z(Nix Qi) (2.8) where:

Dy = air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

Dp3 = air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad)

X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m 3, from Table 2.3) 2-6 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Qi = cumulative release of noble gas radionuclide "i" over the period of interest (WtCi)

Mi = air dose factor due to gamma emissions from noble gas radionuclide "i" 3

(mrad/yr per gCi/m from Table 2.1)

N, = air dose factor due to beta emissions from noble gas radionuclide "i" (mrad/yr per .tCi/m3 , Table 2.1) 3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec)

In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculational equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits, of ODCM Specification 3.4.2. (Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)

D, = 3 .1 7 E-0xX/QxMetrxZQi (2.9) 0.50 and Dp 3 .17 E-08 xX/QXNeff x-Qi (2.10) 0.50 where:

3 Mff = 5.3E+02 effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per ACi/m )

Neff = l.IE+03 effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per itCi/m3 )

0.50 = conservatism factor Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2.3, may be used for the evaluation of the gamma-air and beta-air doses.

2.4.2 Unrestricted Area Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates Per the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.4.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit (5 7.5 mrem) and calendar year limit (5 15 mrem) to any organ. The following equation may be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to releases of 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days:

DRop = 3.17E- 08x W xSFpx Z (RiXQi) (2.11) 2-7 REV. 10 12/14/2006

where:

Daop = dose or dose commitment for age group "a" to organ "o", including the total body, via pathway "p" from 1-131, 1-133, tritium and radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than eight days (mrem)

W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2.3 V/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via 3

other pathways (sec/m )

D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure 2

pathways (Urm )

Ri = dose factor for radionuclide "i", (mrem/yr per g.tCi/m 3 ) or (m 2 - mrem/yr per g.tCi/sec) from Table 2.4 through 2.15 for each age group "a" and the applicable pathway "p" as identified in Table 2.3. Values for Ri were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0133.

Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide "i" -- 1-131 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (9Ci).

SFp = seasonal correction factor to account for the fraction of the period that the applicable exposure pathway does exist.

1) For milk and vegetation exposure pathways:

of months in the period that grazing occurs total # of months in period

= 0.5 for annual calculations

2) For inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways: = 1.0 In lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131 and particulates) dose assessment as presented above, the following simplified dose calculational equation may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of ODCM Specification 3.4.3.

D~w = 3.17E-08x WxSFpx Ri,- 131 XzQi (2.12) where:

Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)

R-13 = 1-13 1 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway 2-8 REV. 10 _

12/14/2006

1 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass-cow-milk pathway controlling (in2 - mrem/yr per tCi/sec)

The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above-simplified calculational method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these pathways to the total thyroid dose, It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g.

Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground plane exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than either the vegetation or grass-cow-milk pathway. However, use of the 1-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclide has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the thyroid via the grass-cow-milk pathway.

The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Kewaunee as identified by the annual land-use census, see REMM Specification 2.2.2. Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2.3.

2.5 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ODCM Specification 3.4.4 requires that the Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System be used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge when projected doses exceed one-half the annual design objective rate in any calendar quarter, i.e., exceeding:

0.62 mrad/quarter, gamma air,

1.25 mrad/quarter, beta air, or

0.94 mrem/quarter, maximum organ.

The applicable gaseous release sources and processing systems are as delineated in Figure 2.

Dose projections are performed at least once per 31 days by the following equations:

Dip = Dyx(91 +-d) (2.13)

Dp, = Dpx(91+d) (2.14)

DMXp =Dxxx(91 +d) (2.15) where:

D-W = gamma air dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrad)

Dy = gamma air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.7) or (2.9) (mrad)

Dp = beta air dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrad) 2-9 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Dp* = beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.8) or (2.10) (mrad)

Dmaxp = maximum organ dose projection for current calendar quarter (mrem)

Dmax = maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.11) or (2.12) (mrem) d = number of days to date in current calendar quarter 91 = number of days in a calendar quarter 2.6 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards 40 CFR 190 For the purpose of implementing ODCM Specification 3.5 on the EPA environmental radiation protection standard and Technical Specification 6.9.b.2 on reporting requirements, dose calculations may be performed using the above equations with the substitution of average or actual meteorological '

parameters for the period of interest and actual applicable pathways. Any exposure attributable to on-site sources will be evaluated based on the results of the environmental monitoring program (TLD measurements) or by calculational methods. NUREG-0543 describes acceptable methods for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR Part 190 when radioactive effluents exceed the Appendix I portion of the specifications.

2.7 Incineration of Radioactively Contaminated Oil During plant operation, radioactively contaminated oils are generated from various pieces of equipment operating in the plant. The largest source of contaminated oil is the reactor coolant pump lubricating oil, which is periodically changed for preventive maintenance reasons. 10 CFR Part 20 allows licensees to incinerate radioactively contaminated oils on site provided that the total radioactive effluents from the facility conform to the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 1.

Radioactively contaminated oil, which is designated for incineration, will be collected in containers, which are uniquely serialized such that the contents can be identified and tracked.

Each container will be sampled and analyzed for radioactivity. The isotopic concentrations will be recorded for each container.

The heating boiler will be utilized to incinerate the radioactively contaminated oil collected on site. A gaseous radwaste effluent dose calculation, as prescribed in Section 2.3 of the ODCM, will be performed to insure that the limits established by ODCM Specifications 3.4.1, 3.4.2 and ""

3.4.3 "are not exceeded. Release of the activity is assumed to occur at the time the contaminated oil is transferred into the heating boiler fuel oil storage tank and will be accounted for using established plant procedures. This will be valid for an assumed release from the fuel oil storage tank vent, fill piping, or from the boiler exhaust stack. See Figure 3 for a description of the heating boiler fuel oil system.

2.8 Total Dose The purpose of this section is to describe the method used to calculate the cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents in accordance with KPS Technical Specifications 2-10 REV. 10 12/14/2006

for total dose. This method can also be used to demonstrate compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40CFR 190, "Environmental Standards for the Uranium Fuel Cycle".

Compliance with the KPS Technical Specification dose objectives for the maximum individual demonstrates compliance with the EPA limits to any member of the public, since the design dose objectives from 10CFR50, Appendix I are much lower than the 40CFR190 dose limits to the general public. With the calculated doses from the releases of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits outlined in ODCM Specifications 3.3.2, 3.4.2, and 3.4.3, a special analysis shall be performed. The purpose of this analysis is to demonstrate if the total dose to any member of the public (real individual) from all uranium fuel cycle sources (including direct radiation contributions from the reactor unit, from outside storage areas and from all real pathways) is limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem per year to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which is limited to 75 mrem per year.

If required, the total dose to a member of the public will be calculated for all significant effluent release points for all real pathways including direct radiation. Effluent releases from Point Beach Nuclear Plant must also be considered due to its proximity. Calculations will be based on the equations in Sections 1.4, 2.4.1, and 2.4.2, with the exception that usage factors and other site specific parameters may be modified using more realistic assumptions, where appropriate.

The direct radiation component from the facility can be determined using environmental TLD results. These results will be corrected for natural background and for actual occupancy time of any areas accessible to the general public at the location of maximum direct radiation. It is recognized that by including the results from the environmental TLDs into the sum of total dose component, the direct radiation dose may be overestimated. The TLD measurements may include the exposure from noble gases, ground plane deposition, and shoreline deposition, which have already been included in the summation of the significant dose pathways to the general public. However, this conservative method can be used, if required, as well as any other method for estimating the direct radiation dose from contained radioactive sources within the facility, The methodology used to incorporate the direct radiation component into total dose estimates will be outlined whenever total doses are reported.

Therefore, the total dose will be determined based on the most realistic site specific data and parameters to assess the real dose to any member of the public.

2-11 REV. 10 12/14/2006

toAtmosphere Auxiliary Figure 2 Building Vent Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Flow Diagram To Atmosphere toAtmosphere To turbine R-13 R-14 Containment Building Vdnt Monitors Containment Purge System Autolsolation 0.11H SMini-Purge Slower ' ""- . .

The shield building ventilation and special ventilation are ESF sy stems and are not part of the normal ef I uent processing system. They are included for completeness only. Cy lnder Operated c Sam pler/Monitor p Pref liter h HEPAFIlter

- The containment air sampler (R-1 1) and radiation monitor (R-12) can also be aligned as needed Damper

[' SamplePoint c Charcoal Filter forsampllngcontainmentvent.

2-12 REV. 10 12/14/2006 I L I 1.- 1,. t ( . I, 1, (, t -, ( - ( ý

r r i f I r ~ '( r r rr. I '( If If' Figure 3 Simplified Heating Boiler Fuel Oil Piping System roof 3" vnt cap wftf flame arrester

-- 3' M un 3'-rod &sample unit 7

Valve Rack L- -.----- J Heating Boiler Fuel Oil Storage Tank heating boiler 30.000 Gallons fuel oil pumps 2-13 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.1 Dose Factors for Noble Gases Total Body Skin Dose Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor K, Li M, NI (mrem/yr (mrem/yr (mrad/yr (mrad/yr Radionuclide per pCi/mr3 ) per pCi/mr3 ) per gCi/m 3) per gCi/m 3)

Kr-83m 7.56E-02 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85m 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04. 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.OIE+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27EE+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E3+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 -"a Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe- 138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 2-14 REV. 10

.12/14/2006

Table 2.2 Parameters for Gaseous Alarm Setpoint Determinations Parameter Actual Value Default Value* Units Comments fQ calculated 3.6E-06 sec/rn 3 Licensing technical specification

__Q__alculated 3.6E-06_seem value Containment -normal plus purge 33,000 3300cfMm modes oe VF fan curves 54,000 Auxiliary Building - normal operation Ci measured N/A _Ci/m3 nuclidemrem/yr per Values from Table 2.1 nuspclidec N/A i,Ci/m 3 Ki nuclide specific N/A tCi/m_3per Values from Table 2.1 mrem/yr nuclide mrem/yr per Values from Table 2.1 specific _________ _______

Mi nuclide N/A mrem/yr 3per Values from Table 2.1

__________ specific 9~Ci/M Sensitivity**

(SEN) 2.32E+07 Containment R-12 R-21 as determined 2.32E+07 cpm per Containment R-1 2.32E+07 giCi/cm 3 Auxiliary Building R-13 2.32E+07 Auxiliary Building R-14 background (bkg)

R-12 4.0E+02 R-12 4.OE+01 Nominal values only; actual R-21 as determined 6.OE+02 cpm values may be used in lieu of R- 13 9.OE+02 these reference values.

R- 14 9.0E+02 Setpoint-* (SP) Default alarm setpoints; more R-12 calculated 2.2E+05 + bkg conservative values may be used R-21 calculated 2.2E+05 + bkg c as deemed appropriate and R-13 calculated 1.3E+05 + bkg pm desirable for ensuring regulatory R- 14 calculated 1.3E+05 + bkg compliance and for maintaining I_ I_ releases ALARA.

Refer to Calculation # C10690 for the default setpoint calculation.

- Conservatively based on Xe-133 sensitivity 2-15 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.3 Controlling Locations, Pathways and Atmospheric Dispersion for Dose Calculations Atmospheric Dispersion ODCM I/Q D/Q Specification Location Pathway(s) (sec/m 3) (,/M 2) 3.4. 1.a site boundary noble gases 36E06 N/A (1300 m, N) direct exposure 3.4.1.b site boundary inhalation 3.6E-06 N/A (1300 m, N) 3.4.2 site boundary gamma-air 3.6E-06 N/A (1300 m, N) beta-air residence/dairy inhalation, 3.4.3 (esilnedai) vegetation, milk and 5.6E-07 5.6E-09 (1 mile W) ground plane 2-16 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.4 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per gCi/m3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 Na-24 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 1.02E+4 P-32 1.32E+6 7.71 E+4 8.64E+4 5.01 E+4 Cr-51 - 5.95E+1 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.00E+2 Mn-54 3.96E+4 9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4. 6.30E+3 Mn-56 1.24E+0 1.30E+0 9.44E+3 2.02E+4 1.83E-1 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1.70E+4 - 7.21 E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 - 1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 6.92E+2 - 3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71 E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 - - 9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 1.15E+4 - - 5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 - - 1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Ni-65 1.54E+0 2.10E-1 - 5.60E+3 1.23E+4 9.12E-2 Cu-64 1.46E+O 4.62E+0 6.78E+3 4.90E+4 6.15E-1 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1.03E+5 - 6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Zn-69 3.38E-2 6.51 E-2 - 4.22E-2 9.20E+2 1.63E+1 4.52E-3 Br-82 -- - 1.04E+4 1.35E+4 Br-83 --- 2.32E+2 2.41 E+2 Br-84 - - 1.64E-3 3.13E+2 Br-85 -- - 1.28E+1 Rb-86 - 1.35E+5 - - 1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Rb-88 - 3.87E+2 - - 3.34E-9 1.93E+2 Rb-89 - 2.56E+2 - - - 1.70E+2 Sr-89 3.04E+5 - - 1.40E+6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 9.92E+7 - - 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.10E+6 Sr-91 6.19E+1 -- - 3.65E+4 1.91E+5 2.50E+0 Sr-92 6.74E+0 - -- 1.65E+4 4.30E+4 2.91 E-1 Y-90 2.09E+3 - 1.70E+5 5.06E+5 5.61 E+1 Y-91m 2.61E-1 -- - 1.92E+3 1.33E+0 1.02E-2 Y-91 4.62E+5 - 1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 Y-92 1.03E+1 - 1.57E+4 7.35E+4 3.02E-1 Y-93 9.44E+1 - 4.85E+4 4.22E+5 2.61 E+0 Zr-95 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 5.42E+4 1.77E+6 1.50E+5 2.33E+4 Zr-97 9.68E+1 1.96E+1 2.97E+1 7.87E+4 5.23E+5 9.04E+O Nb-95 1.41 E+4 7.82E+3 7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21 E+3 Nb-97 2.22E-1 5.62E-2 6.54E-2 2.40E+3 2.42E+2 2.05E-2 Mo-99 - 1.21E+2 - 2.91E+2 9.12E+4 2.48E+5 2.30E+1 Tc-99m 1.03E-3 2.91 E-3 4.42E-2 7.64E+2 4.16E+3 3.70E-2 Tc-101 4.1BE-5 6.02E-5 1.08E-3 3.99E+2 5.90E-4 2-17 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.4 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per RCiVm 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 1.53E+3 5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.10E+5 6.58E+2 Ru-105 7.90E-1 1.02E+0 1.10E+4 4.82E+4 3.11E-1 Ru-106 6.91 E+4 1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.12E+5 8.72E+3 Rh-103m -

Rh-106 -

Ag-110m 1.08E+4 1.00E+4 1.97E+4 4.63E+6 3.02E+5 5.94E+3 Sb-124 3.12E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 2.48E+6 4.06E+5 1.24E+4 Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 1.74E+6 1.01 E+5 1.26E+4 Te-125m 3.42E+3 1.58E+3 1.05E+3 1.24E+4 3.14E+5 7.06E+4 4.67E+2 Te-127m 1.26E+4 5.77E+3 3.29E+3 4.58E+4 9.60E+5 1 .;50E+5 1.57E+3 Te-127 1.40E+O 6.42E-1 1.06E+O 5.1OE+0 6.51E+3 5.74E+4 3.10E-1 Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 Te-129 4.98E-2 2.39E-2 3.90E-2 1.87E-1 1.94E+3 1.57E+2 1.24E-2 Te-131m 6.99E+1 4.36E+1 5.50E+1 3.09E+2 1.46E+5 5.56E+5 2.90E+1 Te-131 1.11E-2 5.95E-3 .9.36E-3 4.37E-2 1.39E+3 1.84E+1 3.59E-3 Te-132 2.60E+2 2.15E+2 1.90E+2 1.46E+3 2.88E+5 5.1OE+5 1.62E+2 1-130 4.58E+3 1.34E+4 1.14E+6 2.09E+4 - 7.69E+3 5.28E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1.19E+7 6.13E+4 - 6.28E+3 2.05E+4 1-132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 - 4.06E+2 1.16E+3 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 - 8.88E+3 4.52E+3 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 - 1.01 E+O 6.15E+2 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11E+4 - 5.25E+3 2.57E+3 Cs-134 3.73E+5 8.48E+5 - 2.87E+5 9.76E+4 1.04E+4 7.28E+5 Cs-136 3.90E+4 1.46E+5 - 8.56E+4 1.20E+4 1.17E+4 1.10E+5 Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21 E+5 - 2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Cs-138 3.31E+2 6.21E+2 - 4.80E+2 4.86E+1 1.86E-3 3.24E+2 Ba-139 9.36E-1 6.66E-4 - 6.22E-4 3.76E+3 8.96E+2 2.74E-2 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 - 1.67E+1 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 Ba-141 1.OOE-1 7.53E-5 7.OOE-5 1.94E+3 1.16E-7 3.36E-3 Ba-142 2.63E-2 2.70E-5 - 2.29E-5 1.19E+3 - 1.66E-3 La-140 3.44E+2 1.74E+2 - 1.36E+5 4.58E+5 4.58E+1 La-142 6.83E-1 3.1OE-1 - 6.33E+3 2.11E+3 7.72E-2 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 - 6.26E+3 3.62E+5 1.20E+5 1.53E+3 Ce-143 1.86E+2 1.38E+2 - 6.08E+1 7.98E+4 2.26E+5 1.53E+1 Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 - 8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 - 2.16E+3 2.81 E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 Pr-144 3.01E-2 1.25E-2 - 7.05E-3 1.02E+3 2.15E-8 1.53E-3 Nd-147 5.27E+3 6.10OE+3 - 3.56E+3 2.21E+5 1.73E+5 3.65E+2 W-187 8.48E+0 7.08E+O - 2.90E+4 1.55E+5 2.48E+0 Np-239 2.30E+2 2.26E+1 7.OOE+1 3.76E+4 1.19E+5 1.24E+1 2-18 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.5 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mrem/yr per gCi/m 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 *4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 Na-24 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 1.38E+4 P-32 1.89E+6 1.10E+5 9.28E+4 7.16E+4 Cr-51 - 7.50E+1 3.07E+1 2.10E+4 3.OOE+3 1.35E+2 Mn-54 5.11E+4 1.27E+4 1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8.40E+3 Mn-56 1.70E+0 1.79E+O 1.52E+4 5.74E+4 2.52E-1 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 - 1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 6.92E+2 - 5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 Co-58 22'07E+3 - 1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 1.51 E+4 - 8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Ni-63 5.80E+5 4.34E+4 - 3.07E+5 1.42E+4 1.98E+4 Ni-65 2.18E+0 2.93E-1 - - 9.36E+3 3.67E+4 1.27E-1 Cu-64 - 2.03E+0 - 6.41E+0 1.11E+4 6.14E+4 8.48E-1 Zn-65 3.86E+4 1.34E+5 - 8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Zn-69 4.83E-2 9.20E-2 - 6.02E-2 1.58E+3 2.85E+2 6.46E-3 Br-82 - - 1.82E+4 Br-83 - - - 3.44E+2 Br-84 . - - 4.33E+2 Br-85 - - - - 1.83E+1 Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - - 1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Rb-88 - 5.46E+2 - - 2.92E-5 2.72E+2 Rb-89 - 3.52E+2 - - 3.38E-7 2.33E+2 Sr-89 4.34E+5 2.42E+6 3.71 E+5 1.25E+4 Sr-90 1.08E+8 - - 1.65E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Sr-91 8.80E+1 - - 6.07E+4 2.59E+5 3.51 E+O Sr-92 9.52E+0 - - 2.74E+4 1.19E+5 4.06E-1 Y-90 2.98E+3 - - 2.93E+5 5.59E+5 8.OOE+1 Y-91 m 3.70E-1 - 3.20E+3 3.02E+1 1.42E-2 Y-91 6.61 E+5 - 2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 Y-92 1.47E+1 - 2.68E+4 1.65E+5 4.29E-1 Y-93 1.35E+2 - - 8.32E+4 5.79E+5 3.72E+O Zr-95 1.46E+5 4.58E+4 - 6.74E+4 2.69E+6 1.49E+5 3.15E+4 Zr-97 1.38E+2 2.72E+1 - 4.12E+1 1.30E+5 6.30E+5 1.26E+1 Nb-95 1.86E+4 1.03E+4 - 1.OOE+4 7.51 E+5 9.68E+4 5.66E+3 Nb-97 3.14E-1 7.78E-2 - 9.12E-2 3.93E+3 2.17E+3 2.84E-2 Mo-99 - 1.69E+2 - 4.11E+2 1.54E+5 2.69E+5 3.22E+1 Tc-99m 1.38E-3 3.86E-3 - 5.76E-2 1.15E+3 6.13E+3 4.99E-2 Tc-101 5.92E-5 8.40E-5 - 1.52E-3 6.67E+2 8.72E-7 8.24E-4 2-19 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.5 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mremlyr per gCi/m 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 2.10E+3 7.43E+3 7.83E+5 1.09E-:5 8.96E+2 Ru-105 1.12E+0 1.41 E+O 1.82E+4 9.04E+4 4.34E-1 Ru-106 9.84E+4 1.90E+5 1.61EE+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Rh-103m -

Rh-106 - - -

Ag-110m 1.38E+4 1.31E+4 2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E÷3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+1 2.74E+6 9.92E+4 1.72E+4 Te-125m 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 Te-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 Te-127 2.01E+0 9.12E-1 1.42E+0 7.28E+O 1.12E+4 8.08E+4 4.42E-1 Te-129m 1.39E+4 6.58E+3 4.58E+3 5.19E+4 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 2.25E+3 Te-129 7.10E-2 3.38E-2 5.18E-2 2.66E-1 3.30E+3 1.62E+3 1.76E-2 Te-131m 9.84E+1 6.01E+1 7.25E+1 4.39E+2 2.38E+5 6.21E+5 4.02E+1 Te-131 1.58E-2 8.32E-3 1.24E-2 6.18E-2 2.34E+3 1.51E+1 5.04E-3 Te-132 3.60E+2 2.90E+2 2.46E+2 1.95E+3 4.49E+5 4.63E+5 2.19E+2 1-130 6.24E+3 1.79E+4 1.49E+6 2.75E+4 - 9.12E+3 7.17E+3 1-131 3.54E+4 4.91 E+4 1.46E+7 8.40E+4 - 6.49E+3 2.64E+4 1-132 1.59E+3 4.38E+3 1.51 E+5 6.92E+3 - 1.27E+3 1.58E+3 1-133 1.22E+4 2.05E+4 2.92E+6 3.59E+4 - 1.03E+4 6.22E+3 1-134 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 - 2.04E+1 8.40E+2 1-135 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 - 6.95E+3 3.49E+3 Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 - 3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E+5 Cs-136 5.15E+4 1.94E+5 - 1.10E+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5 Cs-137 6.70E+5 8.48E+5 - 3.04E+5 1.21 E+5 8.48E+3 3.11E+5 Cs-138 4.66E+2 8.56E+2 - 6.62E+2 7.87E+1 2.70E-1 4.46E+2 Ba-139 1.34E+0 9.44E-4 - 8.88E-4 6.46E+3 6.45E+3 3.90E-2 Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 - 2.28E+1 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Ba-141 1.42E-1 1.06E-4 - 9.84E-5 3.29E+3 7.46E-4 4.74E-3 Ba-142 3.70E-2 3.70E-5 - 3.14E-5 1.91 E+3 2.27E-3 La-140 4.79E+2 2.36E+2 - 2.14E+5 4.87E+5 6.26E+1 La-142 9.60E-1 4.25E-1 - 1.02E+4 1.20E+4 1.06E-1 Ce-141 2.84E+4 1.90E+4 - 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 Ce-143 2.66E+2 1.94E+2 - 8.64E+1 1.30E+5 2.55E+5 2.16E+1 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 - 1.21 E+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 - 3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 Pr-144 4.30E-2 1.76E-2 - 1.01 E-2 1.75E+3 2.35E-4 2.18E-3 Nd-147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 - 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 W-187 1.20E+1 9.76E+0 - 4.74E+4 1.77E+5 3.43E+0 Np-239 3.38E+2 3.19E+1 - 1.00E+2 6.49E+4 1.32E+5 1.77E+1 2-20 REV. 10 12/1412006

Table 2.6 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per RCi/m 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 C-14 3.59E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 Na-24 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 1.61E+4 P-32 2.60E+6 1.14E+5 - - - 4.22E+4 9.88E+4 Cr-51 8.55E+1 2.43E+1 1.70E+4 1.08E+3 1.54E+2 Mn-54 4.29E+4 - 1.OOE+4 1.58E+6 2.29E+4 9.51 E+3 Mn-56 - 1.66E+0 - 1.67E+0 1.31 E+4 1.23E+5 3.12E-1 Fe-55 4.74E+4 2.52E+4 - - 1.11 E+5 2.87E+3 7.77E+3 Fe-59 2.07E+4 3.34E+4 - - 1.27E+6 7.07E+4 1.67E+4 Co-57 - 9.03E+2 - - 5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 - 1.77E+3 - - 1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.16E+3 Co-60 - 1.31 E+4 - 7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21 E+5 4.63E+4 2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4 Ni-65 2.99E+O 2.96E-1 8.18E+3 8.40E+4 1.64E-1 Cu-64 - 1.99E+O 6.03E+0 9.58E+3 3.67E+4 1.07E+0 Zn-65 4.26E+4 1.13E+5 7.14E+4 9.95E+5 1.63E+4 7.03E+4 Zn-69 6.70E-2 9.66E-2 5.85E-2 1.42E+3 1.02E+4 8.92E-3 Br-82 - - - 2.09E+4 Br-83 - - - - 4.74E+2 Br-84 - - - - - 5.48E+2 Br-85 - - - - - 2.53E+1 Rb-86 - 1.98E+5 - - 7.99E+3 1.14E+5 Rb-88 - 5.62E+2 - - 1.72E+1 3.66E+2 Rb-89 - 3.45E+2 - - 1.89E+0 2.90E+2 Sr-89 5.99E+5 - - 2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4 Sr-90 1.01 E+8 - - 1.48E+7 3.43E+5 6.44E+6 Sr-91 1.21 E+2 - - 5.33E+4 1.74E+5 4.59E+0 Sr-92 1.31 E+1 - - 2.40E+4 2.42E+5 5.25E-1 Y-90 4.11E+3 - - 2.62E+5 2.68E+5 1.11E+2 Y-91m 5.07E-1 - - - 2.81 E+3 1.72E+3 1.84E-2 Y-91 9.14E+5 - - - 2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 Y-92 2.04E+1 - - - 2.39E+4 2.39E+5 5.81 E-1 Y-93 1.86E+2 -- 7.44E+4 3.89E+5 5.11 E+0 Zr-95 1.90E+5 4.18E+4 - 5.96E+4 2.23E+6 6.11 E+4 3.70E+4o Zr-97 1.88E+2 2.72E+1 - 3.89E+1 1.13E+5 3.51E+5 1.60E+1 Nb-95 2.35E+4 9.18E+3 - 8.62E+3 6.14E+5 3.70E+4 6.55E+3 Nb-97 4.29E-1 7.70E-2 8.55E-2 3.42E+3 2.78E+4 3.60E-2 Mo-99 1.72E+2 3.92E+2 1.35E+5 1.27E+5 4.26E+1

- Tc-99m 1.78E-3 3.48E-3 5.07E-2 9.51 E+2 4.81 E+3 5.77E-2 Tc-101 8.10E-5 8.51E-5 1.45E-3 5.85E+2 1.63E+1 1.08E-3 2-21 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.6 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mremryr per gCVm 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 2.79E+3 7.03E+3 6.62E+5 4.48E+4 1.07E+3 Ru-105 1.53E+O - 1.34E+O 1.59E+4 9.95E+4 5.55E-1 Ru-106 1.36E+5 - 1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4 Rh-1 03m - - -

Rh-106 - -

Ag-110m 1.69E+4 1.14E+4 2.12E+4 5.48E+6 1.OOE+5 9.14E+3 Sb-124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 1.26E+2 - 3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.OOE+4 Sb-125 9.84E+4 7.59E+2 9.10E+1 - 2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4

Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9.14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 8.55E+3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3.

Te-127 2.77E+O 9.51E-1 1.96E+0 7.07E+O 1.OOE+4 5.62E+4 6.11E-1 Te-129m 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 5.03E+4 1.76E+6 1.82E+5 3.04E+3 Te-129 9.77E-2 3.50E-2 7.14E-2 2.57E-1 2.93E+3 2.55E+4 2.38E-2 Te-131 m 1.34E+2 5.92E+1 9.77E+1 4.OOE+2 2.06E+5 3.08E+5 5.07E+1 Te-131 2.17E-2 8.44E-3 1.70E-2 5.88E-2 2.05E+3 1.33E+3 6.59E-3 Te-132 4.81 E+2 2.72E+2 3.17E+2 1.77E+3 3.77E+5 1.38E+5 2.63E+2 1-130 8.18E+3 1.64E+4 1.85E+6 2.45E+4 - 5.11E+3 8.44E+3 1-131 4.81E+4 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4 - 2.84E+3 2.73E+4 1-132 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3 - 3.20E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 - 5.48E+3 7.70E+3 1-134 1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 - 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 - 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 Cs-134 6.51E+5 1.01 E+6 - 3.30E+5 1.21 E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 Cs-136 6.51E+4 1.71E+5 - 9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 1.16E+5 Cs-137 9.07E+5 8.25E+5 - 2.82E+5 1.04E+5 3.62E+3 1.28E+5 Cs-138 6.33E+2 8.40E+2 - 6.22E+2 6.81 E+1 2.70E+2 5.55E+2 Ba-139 1.84E+0 9.84E-4 - 8.62E-4 5.77E+3 5.77E+4 5.37E-2 Ba-140 7.40E+4 6.48E+1 - 2.11E+1 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 Ba-141 1.96E-1 1.09E-4 - 9.47E-5 2.92E+3 2.75E+2 6.36E-3 Ba-142 5.OOE-2 3.60E-5 - 2.91E-5 1.64E+3 2.74E+O 2.79E-3 La-140 6.44E+2 2.25E+2 - - 1.83E+5 2.26E+5 7.55E+1 La-142 1.30E+0 4.11E-1 - 8.70E+3 7.59E+4 1.29E-1 Ce-141 3.92E+4 1.95E+4 - 8.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+4 2.90E+3 Ce-143 3.66E+2 1.99E+2 - 8.36E+1 1.15E+5 1.27E+5 2.87E+1 Ce-144 6.77EE+6 2.12E+6 - 1.17E+6 1.20E+7 3.89E+5 3.61 E+5 Pr-143 1.85E+4 5.55E+3 - 3.OOE+3 4.33E+5 9.73E+4 9.14E+2 Pr-144 5.96E-2 1.85E-2 - 9.77E-3 1.57E+3 1.97E+2 3.OOE-3 Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 - 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 W-187 1.63E+1 9.66E+0 - - 4.11 E+4 9.1OE+4 4.33E+0 Np-239 4.66E+2 3.34E+1 - 9.73E+1 5.81 E+4 6.40E+4 2.35E+1 2-22 REV. 10 12/14/2006 '

Table 2.7 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per LiCVm 3 )

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 C-14 2.65E+4 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 Na-24 1.06E+4 1.06E+4 1.06E+4 '1.06E+4 1.06E+4 1.06E+4 1.06E+4 P-32 2.03E+6 1.12E+5 1.61E+4 7.74E+4 Cr-51 5.75E+1 1.32E+1 1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1 Mn-54 2.53E+4 - 4.98E+3 1.OOE+6 7.06E+3 4.98E+3 Mn-56 1.54E+O - 1,1OE+O 1.25E+4 7.17E+4 2.21E-1 Fe-55 1.97E+4 1.17E+4 - - 8.69E+4 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 - - 1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 6.51 t+2 - - 3.79E+5 4.86E+3 6.41 E+2 Co-58 1.22E+3 - - 7.77E+5 1.11E+4 1.82E+3 Co-60 8.02E+3 - - 4.51E+6 3.19E+4 1.18E+4 Ni-63 3.39E+5 2.04E+4 - 2.09E+5 2.42E+3 1.16E+4 Ni-65 2.39E+0 2.84E-1 - 8.12E+3 5.01 E+4 1.23E-1 Cu-64 1.88E+0 - 3.98E+O 9.30E+3 1.50E+4 7.74E-1 Zn-65 1.93E+4 6.26E+4 - 3.25E+4 6.47E+5 5.14E+4 3.11 E+4 Zn-69 5.39E-2 9.67E-2 - 4.02E-2 1.47E+3 1.32E+4 7.18E-3 Br-82 - - - - 1.33E+4 Br-83 - - - - - 3.81 E+2 Br-84 - - - - - 4.OOE+2 Br-85 - - - - - 2.04E+1 Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - - 3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Rb-88 - 5.57E+2 - - - 3.39E+2 2.87E+2 Rb-89 - 3.21 E+2 - - - 6.82E+1 2.06E+2 Sr-89 3.98E+5 - - - 2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 Sr-90 4.09E+7 - - - 1.12E+7 1.31 E+5 2.59E+6 Sr-91 9.56E+1 - - - 5.26E+4 7.34E+4 3.46E+0 Sr-92 1.05E+1 - - - 2.38E+4 1.40E+5 3.91E-1 Y-90 3.29E+3 - - 2.69E+5 1.04E+5 8.82E+1 Y-91m 4.07E-1 - - 2.79E+3 2.35E+3 1.39E-2 Y-91 5.88E+5 - - 2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 Y-92 1.64E+1 - - 2.45E+4 1.27E+5 4.61 E-1 Y-93 1.50E+2 - - - 7.64E+4 1.67E÷5 4.07E+0 Zr-95 1.15E+5 2.79E+4 - 3.11 E+4 1.75E+6 2.17E+4 2.03E+4 Zr-97 1.50E+2 2.56E+1 - 2.59E+1 1.10E+5 1.40E+5 1.17E+1 Nb-95 1.57E+4 6.43E+3 - 4.72E+3 4.79E+5 1.27E+4 3.78E+3 Nb-97 3.42E-1 7.29E-2 - 5.70E-2 3.32E+3 2.69E+4 2.63E-2 Mo-99 1.65E+2 - 2.65E+2 1.35E+5 4.87E+4 3.23E+1 Tc-99m 1.40E-3 2.88E-3 - 3.11 E-2 8.11 E+2 2.03E+3 3.72E-2 Tc-101 6.51 E-5 8.23E-5 - 9.79E-4 5.84E+2 8.44E+2 8.12E-4 2-23 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.7 R, Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per gCi/m 3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 2.02E+3 4.24E+3 5.52E+5 1.61 E+4 6.79E+2 Ru-105 1.22E+O 8.99E-1 1.57E+4 4.84E+4 4.10E-1 Ru-106 8.68E+4 - 1.07E+5 1.16E+7 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Rh-103m - - -

Rh-106 - - -

Ag-11 Om 9.98E+3 7.22E+3 - 1.09E+4 3.67E+6 3.30E+4 5.OOE+3 Sb-124 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.01 E+2 - 2.65E+6 5.91 E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 6.23E+1 1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 Te-125m 4.76E+3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3 4.47E+5 1.29E+4 6.58E+2 Te-127m 1.67E+4 6.90E+3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31 E+6 2.73E+4 2.07E+3 Te-127 2.23E+O 9.53E-1 1.85E+O 4.86E+0 1.03EE+4 2.44E+4 4.89E-1 Te-129m 1.41EE+4 6.09E+3 5.47E+3 3.18BE+4 1.68E+6 6.90E+4 2.23E+3 Te-129 7.88E-2 3.47E-2 6.75E-2 1.75E-1 3.00E+3 2.63E+4 1.88E-2 Te-131m 1.07E+2 5.50E+1 8.93E+1 2.65E+2 1.99E+5 1.19E+5 3.63E+1 Te-131 1.74E-2 8.22E-3 1.58E-2 3.99E-2 2.06E+3 8.22E+3 5.OOE-3 Te-1 32 3.72E+2 2.37E+2 2.79E+2 1.03E+3 3.40E+5 4.41 E+4 1.76E+2 1-130 6.36E+3 1.39E+4 1.60E+6 1.53E+4 - 1.99E+3 5.57E+3 1-131 3.79E+4 4.44E+4 1.48E+7 5.18E+4 - 1.06E+3 1.96E+4 1-132 1.69E+3 3.54E+3 1.69E+5 3.95E+3 - 1.90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 - 2.16E+3 5.60E+3 1-134 9.21 E+2 1.88E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 - 1.29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 3.86E+3 7.60E+3 6.96E+5 8.47E+3 - 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-1 34 3.96E+5 7.03E+5 - 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 Cs-1 36 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 - 5.64E+4 1.18E+4 1.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.12E+5 - 1.72E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3 4.55E+4 Cs-138 5.05E+2 7.81E+2 - 4.1OE+2 6.54E+1 8.76E+2 3.98E+2 Ba-139 1.48E+0 9.84E-4 - 5.92E-4 5.95E+3 5.10E+4 4.30E-2 Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 - 1.34E+1 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 Ba-141 1.57E-1 1.08E-4 - 6.50E-5 2.97E+3 4.75E+3 4.97E-3 Ba-142 3.98E-2 3.30E-5 - 1.90E-5 1.55E+3 6.93E+2 1.96E-3 La-140 5.05E+2 2.OOE+2 - 1.68E+5 8.48E+4 5.15E+1 La-142 1.03E+0 3.77E-1 - 8.22E+3 5.95E+4 9.04E-2 Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 - 5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-143 2.93E+2 1.93E+2 - 5.64E+1 1.16E+5 4.97E+4 2.21 E+1 Ce-144 3.19E+6 1.21 E+6 - 5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 1.76E+5 Pr-143 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 - 1.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 6.99E+2 Pr-144 4.79E-2 1.85E-2 - 6.72E-3 1.61 E+3 4.28E+3 2.41 E-3 Nd-147 7.94E+3 8.13E+3 - 3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4 5.OOE+2 W-187 1.30E+1 9.02E+0 - - 3.96E+4 3.56E+4 3.12E+0 Np-239 3.71 E+2 3.32E+1 - 6.62E+1 5.95E+4 2.49E+4 1.88E+1 2-24 REV. 10

-- W 12/14/2006

Table 2.8 RI Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mremlyr per R+/-CiVm 3) for H-3 and C-14 (M2 x mremlyr gClisec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 - 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 C-14 8.97E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 Na-24 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 2.76E+5 P-32 1.40E+9 8.73E+7 -, 1.58E+8 5.42E+7 Cr-51 -- 2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-54 - 3.11 E+8 9.27E+7 9.54E+8 5.94E+7 Mn-56 - 1.61 E+1 2.04E+1 5.13E+2 2.85EE+0 Fe-55 2.09E+8 1.45E+8 8.06E+7 8.29E+7 3.37E+7 Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 - 1.17E+7 - 2.97E+8 1.95E+7 Co-58 - 3.09E+7 - 6.26E+8 6.92E+7 Co-60 - 1.67E+8 - 3.14E+9 3.69E+8 Ni-63 1.04E+10 7.21 E+8 - 1.50E+8 3.49E+8 Ni-65 6.15E+1 7.99E+0 - 2.03E+2 3.65E+0 Cu-64 - 9.27E+3 2.34E+4 - 7.90E+5 4.35E+3 Zn-65 3.17E+8 1.01 E+9 6.75E+8 - 6.36E+8 4.56E+8 Zn-69 8.75E-6 1.67E-5 1.09E-5 - 2.51E-6 1.16E-6 Br-82 -... 1.73E+6 1.51 E+6 Br-83 - 4.63E+O 3.21 E+0 Br-84 -- --

Br-85 -....

Rb-86 - 2.19E+8 - - 4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Rb-88 -- - -

Rb-89 -...

Sr-89 9.96E+9 - - - 1.60E+9 2.86E+8 Sr-90 6.05E+11 - - - 1.75E+10 1.48E+11 Sr-91 3.20E+5 - - - 1.52E+6 1.29E+4 Sr-92 4.27E+2 - 8.46E+3 1.85E+1 Y-90 1.33E+4 - 1.41 E+8 3.55E+2 Y-91m 5.83E-9 - - - 1.71E-8 Y-91 5.13E+6 .... 2.82E+9 1.37E+5 Y-92 9.01 E-1 - - - 1.58E+4 2.63E-2 Y-93 1.74E+2 - 5.52E+6 4.80E+O Zr-95 1.19E+6 3.81E+5 - 5.97E+5 - 1.21E+9 2.58E+5 Zr-97 3.33E+2 6.73E+1 - 1.02E+2 - 2.08E+7 3.08E+1 Nb-95 1.42E+5 7.91 E+4 - 7.81 E+4 - 4.80E+8 4.25E+4 Nb-97 2.90E-6 7.34E-7 - 8.56E-7 - 2.71 E-3 2.68E-7 Mo-99 6.25E+6 1.41EE+7 - 1.45E+7 1.19E+6 Tc-99m 3.06E+0 8.66E+O - 1.32E+2 4.24E+0 5.12E+3 1.10E+2 Tc-101 2-25 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.8 R, Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mremlyr per pCI/m 3 ) for H-3 and C-14 (m 2 x mremlyr pCisec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 4.80E+6 - 1.83E+7 - 5.61 E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-105 5.39E+1 - 6.96E+2 - 3.30E+4 2.13E+1 Ru-106 1.93E+8 - 3.72E+8 - 1.25E+10 2.44E+7 Rh-103m .... --

Rh-106 ....

Ag-110m 1.06E+7 9,76E+6 1.92E+7 - 3.98E+9 5.80E+6 Sb-124 1.04E+8 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 8.08E+7 2.95E+9 4.11E+7 Sb-125 1.36E+8 1.52E+6 1.39E+5 1.05E+8 1.50E+9 3.25E+7 Te-125m 9.66E+7 3.50E+7 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 3.86E+8 1.29E+7 Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+9 - 1.17E+9 4.26E+7 Te-127 5.76E+3 2.07E+3 4.27E+3 2.35E+4 - 4.54E+5 1.25E+3 Te-129m 2.55E+8 9.50E+7 8.75E+7 1.06E+9 - 1.28E+9 4.03E+7 Te-129 6.65E-4 2.50E-4 5.1OE-4 2.79E-3 - 5.02E-4 1.62E4 Te-131m 9.12E+5 4.46E+5 7.06E+5 4.52E+6 - 4.43E+7 3.72E+5 Te-131 .-..

Te-132 4.29E+6 2.77E+6 3.06E+6 2.67E+7 1.31 E+8 2.60E+6 1-130 3.96E+5 1.17E+6 9.90E+7 1.82E+6 - 1.01 E+6 4.61E+5 1-131 8.09E+7 1.16E+8 3.79E+10 1.98E+8 - 3.05E+7 6.63E+7 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 - 2.89E+1 5.38E+1 1-133 2.12E+6 3.69E+6 5.42E+8 6.44E+6 - 3.31 E+6 1.12E+6 1-134 1.06E-4 2.88E-4 5.OOE-3 4.59E-4 2.51E-7 1.03E-4 1-135 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 1.21E+5 3.94E+4 Cs-134 4.66E+9 1.11E+10 3.59E+9 1.19E+9 1.94E+8 9.07E+9 Cs-136 4.20E+7 1.66E+8 9.24E+7 1.27E+7 1,89E+7 1.19E+8 Cs-137 6.36E+9 8.70E+9 2.95E+9 9.81 E+8 1.68E+8 5.70E+9 Cs-138 - -

Ba-139 2.95E-2 2.10E-5 - 1.96E-5 1.19E-5 5.23E-2 8.64E-4 Ba-140 1.29E+8 1.62E+5 5.49E+4 9.25E+4 2.65E+8 8.43E+6 Ba-141 Ba-142 " -

La-140 1.97E+3 9.92E+2 - 7.28E+7 2.62E+2 La-142 1.40E-4 6.35E-5 - 4.64E-1 1.58E-5 Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 6.17E+4 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 Ce-143 1.OOE+3 7.42E+5 3.26E+2 2.77E+7 8.21E+1 Ce-144 3.29E+7 1.38E+7 8.16E+6 1.11E+10 1.77E+6 Pr-143 6.34E+4 2.54E+4 1.47E+4 2.78E+8 3.14E+3 Pr-144 - - -

Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 2.25E+4 - 1.85E+8 2.31 E+3 W-187 3.82E+4 3.19E+4 - 1.05E+7 1.12E+4 Np-239 1.42E+3 1.40E+2 4.37E+2 2.87E+7 7.72E+1 2-26 REV. 10 12/14/2006

VTable 2.9 II Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mremlyr per j+/-Ci/m 3 ) for H-3 and C-14 (m 2 x mrem/yr ILCI/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 Na-24 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 2.45E+5 P-32 1.61 E+9 9.96E+7 1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 Mn-54 4.52E+8 - 1.35E+8 9.27E+8 8.97E+7 Mn-56 1.45E+1 - 1.83E+1 9.54E+2 2.58E+0 Fe-55 3.25E+8 2.31 E+8 - 1.46E+8 9.98E+7 5.38E+7 Fe-59 1.81 E+8 4.22E+8 - - 1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 - 1.79E+7 - - 3.34E+8 3.00E+7 Co-58 4.38E+7 - - 6.04E+8 1.01 E+8 Co-60 2.49E+8 - - 3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1.61E+10 1.13E+9 - - 1.81E+8 5.45E+8 Ni-65 5.73E+1 7.32E+O - - 3.97E+2 3.33E+0 Cu-64 8.40E+3 - 2.12E+4 6.51E+5 3.95E+3 Zn-65 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 - 9.41 E+8 6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Zn-69 8.19E-6 1.56E-5 - 1.02E-5 2.88E-5 1.09E-6 Br-82 - - - 1.33E+6 Br-83 .... 3.01 E+O Br-84 -...

Br-85 -.....

Rb-86 - 2.73E+8 - - - 4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Rb-88 - - -

Rb-89 - - -

Sr-89 1.51 E+10 - -. 1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51E+1 1 - - 2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Sr-91 2.99E+5 - - 1.36E+6 1.19E+4 Sr-92 3.97E+2 - -. 1.01E+4 1.69E+1 Y-90 1.24E+4 - - 1.02E+8 3.34E+2 Y-91m 5.43E-9 - - 2.56E-7 -

Y-91 7.87E+6 - - 3.23E+9 2.11 E+5 Y-92 8.47E-1 - 2.32E+4 2.45E-2 Y-93 1.63E+2 - - 4.98E+6 4.47E+0 Zr-95 1.74E+6 .5.49E+5 - 8.07E+5 1.27E+9 3.78E+5 Zr-97 3.09E+2 6.11E+I1 - 9.26E+1 1.65E+7 2.81E+1 Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 - 1.03E+5 4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Nb-97 2.69E-6 6.67E-7 7.80E-7 - 1.59E-2 2.44E-7 Mo-99 5.74E+6 1.31E+7 1.03E+7 1.09E+6 Tc-99m 2.70E+0 7.54E+0 1.12E+2 4.19E+0 4.95E+3 9.77E+1 Tc-101 2-27 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.9 R, Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mrem/yr per j*CiIm 3 ) for H-3 and C-14 (M 2 x mremnyr gCi/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 6.87E+6 - 2.42E+7 - 5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-105 5.OOE+1 - 6.31 E+2 - 4.04E+4 1.94E+1 Ru-106 3.09E+8 - 5.97E+8 - 1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Rh-103m - - -

Rh-106 ....

Ag-110m 1.52E+7 1.44E+7 - 2.74E+7 - 4.04E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124 1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 - 1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 2.04E+5 - 1.88E+8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 - 4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m 5.51E+8 .1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 - 1.37E+9 6.56E+7 Te-127 5.43E+3 1.92E+3 3.74E+3 2.20E+4 - 4.19E+5 1.17E+3 Te-129m 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 1.54E+9 - 1.38E+9 5.81E+7 Te-129 6.22E-4 2.32E-4 4.45E-4 2.61E-3 - 3.40E-3 1.51E-4 Te-131m 8.44E+5 4.05E+5 6.09E+5 4.22E+6 - 3.25E+7 3.38E+5 Te-131 - -

Te-132 3.90E+6 2.47E+6 2.60E+6 2.37E+7 - 7.82E+7 2.32E+6 1-130 3.54E+5 1.02E+6 8.35E+7 1.58E+6 - 7.87E+5 4.09E+5 1-131 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+10 1.85E+8 - 2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 - 5.91 E+1 4.87E+1 1-133 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 - 2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01 E-4 - 3.35E-6 9.13E-5 1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.1OE+6 1.50E+5 - 1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 7.09E+9 1.67E+10 5.30E+9 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8 Cs-137 1.01E+10 1.35E+10 4.59E+9 1.78E+9 1.92E+8 4.69E+9 Cs-138 -

Ba-1 39 2.77E-2 1.95E-5 - 1.84E-5 1.34E-5 2.47E-1 8.08E-4 Ba-140 1.38E+8 1.69E+5 - 5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ba-141 -

Ba-142 La-140 1.80E+3 8.84E+2 - - 5.08E+7 2.35E+2 La-142 1.28E-4 5.69E-5 - - 1.73E+0 1.42E-5 Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 - 8.86E+4 - 5.38E+8 2.16E+4 Ce-i 43 9.37E+2 6.82E+5 - 3.06E+2 - 2.05E+7 7.62E+1 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 - 1.30E+7 - 1.33E+10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 - 1.65E+4 - 2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Pr-144 - - - -

Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 - 2.32E+4 1.42E+8 2.36E+3 W-187 3.55E+4 2.90E+4 - - 7.84E+6 1.02E+4 Np-239 1.38E+3 1.30E+2 4.09E+2 - 2.10E+7 7.24E+1 2-28 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.10 R, Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per gCI/m 3) for H-3 and C-14 (m 2 x mremlyr giCi/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 4.01 E+3 4.01 E+3 4.01 E+3 4.01 E+3 4.01 E+3 4.01 E+3 C-14 3.50E+6 7.01 E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01 E+5 Na-24 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 3.83E+5 P-32 3.37E+9 1.58E+8 - 9.30E+7 1.30E+8 Cr-51 - 6.54E+4 1.79E+4 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 Mn-54 6.61 E+8 - 1.85E+8 - 5.55E+8 1.76E+8 Mn-56 1.90E+1 - 2.29E+1 - 2.75E+3 4.28E+0 Fe-55 8.OOE+8 4.24E+8 - 2.40E+8 7.86E+7 1.31 E+8 Fe-59 4.01 E+8 6.49E+8 - 1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 2.99E+7 - - 2.45E+8 6.04E+7 Co-58 6.47E+7 - - - 3.77E+8 1.98E+8 Co-60 3.78E+8 - - - 2..10E+9 1.12E+9 Ni-63 3.95E+10 2.11E+9 - - - 1.42E+8 1.34E+9 Ni-65 1.05E+2 9.89E+0 - - - 1.21 E+3 5.77E+0 Cu-64 1.11 E+4 - 2.68E+4 - 5.20E+5 6.69E+3 Zn-65 8.12E+8 2.16E+9 1.36E+9 - 3.8OE+8 1.35E+9 Zn-69 1.51E-5 2.18E-5 1.32E-5 - 1.38E-3 2.02E-6 Br-82 - -- 2.04E+6 Br-83 - - - 5.55E+0 Br-84 - - -

Br-85 - - - -

Rb-86 - 4.52E+8 - 2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Rb-88 - - -

Rb-89 - - -

Sr-89 3.59E+10 - 1.39E+9 1.03E+9 Sr-90 1.24E+12 - 1.67E+10 3.15E+ 11 Sr-91 5.50E+5 -- 1.21 E+6 2.08E+4 Sr-92 7.28E+2 - 1.38E+4 2.92E+1 Y-90 2.30E+4 - 6.56E+7 6.17E+2 Y-91m 9.94E-9 - - 1.95E-5 -

Y-91 1.87E+7 - - 2.49E+9 5.01 E+5 Y-92 1.56E+0 - - 4.51 E+4 4.46E-2 Y-93 3.01 E+2 - - 4.48E+6 8.25E+0 Zr-95 3.90E+6 8.58E+5 - 1.23E+6 - 8.95E+8 7.64E+5 Zr-97 5.64E+2 8.15E+1 1.17E+2 - 1.23E+7 4.81E+1 Nb-95 4.1OE+5 1.59E+5 - 1.50E+5 - 2.95E+8 1.14E+5 Nb-97 4.90E-6 8.85E-7 - 9.82E-7 - 2.73E-1 4.13E-7 Mo-99 7.83E+6 - 1.67E+7 - 6.48E+6 1.94E+6 Tc-99m 4.65E+O 9.12E+0 - 1.33E+2 4.63E+0 5.19E+3 1.51E+2 Tc-101 - - -

2-29 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.10 R, Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mremlyr per jiCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (M 2 x mrem/yr +/-Cl/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 1.55E+7 - - 3.89E+7 3.99E+8 5.94E+6 Ru-105 9.17E+1 8.06E+2 5.98E+4 3.33E+1 Ru-106 7.45E+8 1.01E+9 1.16E+10 9.30E+7 Rh-103m ---

Rh-106 - -

Ag-110m 3.22E+7 2.17E+7 4.05E+7 2.58E+9 1.74E+7 Sb-124 3.52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 - 1.96E+8 2.20E+9 1.23E+8 Sb-125 4.99E+8 3.85E+6 4.62E+5 - 2.78E+8 1.19E+9 1.05E+8 Te-125m 3.51 E+8 9.50E+7 9.84E+7 - 3.38E+8 4.67E+7 Te-127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 - 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-127 1.00E+4 2.70E+3 6.93E+3 2.85E+4 - 3.91E+5 2.15E+3 Te-129m 8.54E+8 2.39E+8 2.75E+8 2.51 E+9 - 1.04E+9 1.33E+8 Te-129 1.15E-3 3.22E-4 8.22E-4 3.37E-3 - 7.17E-2 2.74E-4 Te-131m 1.54E+6 5.33E+5 1.10E+6 5.16E+6 2.16E+7 5.68E+5 Te-131 - -

Te-132 6.98E+6 3.09E+6 4.50E+6 2.87E+7 - 3.11 E+7 3.73E+6 1-130 6.21 E+5 1.26E+6 1.38E+8 1.88E+6 - 5.87E+5 6.47E+5 1-131 1.43E+8 1.44E+8 4.76E+10 2.36E+8 - 1.28E+7 8.18E+7 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 - 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 1-133 3.59E+6 4.44E+6 8.25E+8 7.40E+6 - 1.79E+6 1.68E+6 1-134 1.70E-4 3.16E-4 7.28E-3 4.84E-4 - 2.10E-4 1.46E-4 1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81 E+5 - 8.98E+4 5.57E+4 Cs-134 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 8.14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 1.18E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 Cs-138 -- - -

Ba-139 5.11E-2 2.73E-5 2.38E-5 1.61E-5 2.95E+0 1.48E-3 Ba-140 2.77E+8 2.43E+5 7.90E+4 1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 Ba-141 - - -

Ba-142 - - - -

La-140 3.23E+3 1.13E+3 - 3.15E+7 3.81 E+2 La-142 2.32E-4 7.40E-5 - - 1.47E+1 2.32E-5 Ce-1 41 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 - 1.43E+5 - 4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-143 1.73E+3 9.36E+5 - 3.93E+2 - 1.37E+7 1.36E+2 Ce-144 1.27E+8- 3.98E+7 - 2.21E+7 - 1.04E+10 6.78E+6 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 - 2.41E+4 - 1.60E+8 7.37E+3 Pr-144 -- - -

Nd-147 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 3.18E+4 - 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 W-187 6.47E+4 3.83E+4 - 5.38E+6 1.72E+4 Np-239 2.55E+3 1.83E+2 5.30E+2 - 1.36E+7 1.29E+2 2-30 REV. 10 12/14/2006

- Table 2.11 R, Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per ptCVm 3 ) for H-3 and C-14 (M 2 x mremlyr .Ci/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 - 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 3.63E+5 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 Na-24 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 2.54E+6 P-32 1.71E+10 1.06E+9 -- - 1.92E+9 6.60E+8 Cr-51 - 1.71 E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 Mn-54 8.40E+6 - 2.50E+6 2.57E+7 1.60E+6 Mn-56 - 4.23E-3 - 5.38E-3 1.35E-1 7.51 E-4 Fe-55 2.51 E+7 1.73E+7 - 9.67E+6 9.95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.OOE+7 - 1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 - 1.28E+6 -- - 3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 4.72E+6 -- - 9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 1.64E+7 -- - 3.08E+8 3.62E+7 Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 -- 9.73E+7 2.26E+8 Ni-65 3.70E-1 4.81 E-2 - 1.22E+O 2.19E-2 Cu-64 2.41 E+4 - 6.08E+4 - 2.05E+6 1.13E+4-Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 - 2.92E+9 - 2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Zn-69 - -

Br-82 - - 3.72E+7 3.25E+7 Br-83 - - 1.49E-1 1.03E-1 Br-84 -- -

Br-85 - - -

Rb-86 - 2.59E+9 - - 5.11E+8 1.21 E+9 Rb-88 -- -

Rb-89 -- -

Sr-89 1.45E+9 - - 2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 - - 1.35E+9 1.15E÷10 Sr-91 3.13E+4 - -- 1.49E+5 1.27E+3 Sr-92 4.89E-1 - - 9.68E+O 2.11 E-2 Y-90 7.07E1 -- - 7.50E+5 1.90E+O Y-91m - -

Y-91 8.60E+3 - - 4.73E+6 2.30E+2 Y-92 5.42E-5 - - 9.49E-1 1.58E-6 Y-93 2.33E-1 - 7.39E+3 6.43E-3 Zr-95 9.46E+2 3.03E+2 4.76E+2 - 9.62E+5 2.05E+2 Zr-97 4.26E-1 8.59E-2 1.30E-1 - 2.66E+4 3.93E-2 Nb-95 8.25E+4 4.59E+4 4.54E+4 2.79E+8 2.47E+4 Nb-97 - 5.47E-9 Mo-99 2.52E+7 5.72E+7 5.85E+7 4.80E+6 Tc-99m 3.25E+O 9.19E+O 1.40E+2 4.50E+O 5.44E+3 1.17E+2 Tc-101 - -

2-31 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.11 R, Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mremlyr per gtCVm 3 ) for H-3 and C-14 (m 2 x mrem/yr lClisec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 1.02E+3 3.89E+3 1.19E+5 4.39E+2 Ru-105 8.57E-4 1.11E-2 5.24E-1 3.38E-4 Ru-106 2.04E+4 3.94E+4 . 1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Rh-103m - -

Rh-106 - - -

Ag-110m 5.83E+7 5.39E+7 1.06E+8 2.20E+10 3.20E+7 Sb-124 2.57E+7 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 - 2.OOE+7 7.31E+8 1.02E+7 Sb-125 2.04E+7 2.28E+5 2.08E+4 - 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 4.86E+6 Te-125m 1.63E+7 5.90E+6 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 6.50E+7 2.18E+6 Te-127m 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 1.54E+8 5.58E+6 Te-127 6.72E+2 2.41EE+2 4.98E+2 2.74E+3 5.30E+4 1.45E+2 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 3.04E+8 9.57E+6 Te-129 -

Te-131m 3.61E+5 1.77E+5 2.80E+5 1.79E+6 1.75E+7 1.47E+5 Te-131 - -- -

Te-132 2.39E+6 1.55E+6 1.71E+6 1.49E+7 7.32E+7 1.45E+6 1-130 4.26E+5 1.26E+6 1.07E+8 1.96E+6 1.08E+6 4.96E+5 1-131 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+ 11 7.27E+8 - 1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 - 8.22E-2 1.53E-1 1-133 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+7 6.20E+6 2.10E+6 1-134 --

1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 - 4.10E+4 1.34E+4 Cs-134 5.65E+9 1.34E+10 4.35E+9 1.44E+9 2.35E+8 1.1OE+10 Cs-136 2.61E+8 1.03E+9 5.74E+8 7.87E+7 1.17E+8 7.42E+8 Cs-137 7.38E+9 1.01E+10 3.43E+9 1.14E+9 1.95E+8 6.61 E+9 Cs-138 - - -

Ba-139 4.70E-8 - - 8.34E-8 1.38E-9 Ba-140 2.69E+7 3.38E+4 1.15E+4 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.76E+6 Ba-141 - - -

Ba-142 - - -

La-140 4.49E+0 2.26E+0 - 1.66E+5 5.97E-1 La-142 - - 3.03E-8 -

Ce-141 4.84E+3 3.27E+3 - 1.52E+3 - 1.25E+7 3.71 E+2 Ce-143 4.19E+1 3.09E+4 - 1.36E+1 - 1.16E+6 3.42E+0 Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 - 8.87E+4 1.21 E+8 1.92E+4 Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 - 3.68E+1 6.96E+5 7.88E+0 Pr-144 -

Nd-147 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 6.37E+1 5.23E+5 6.52E+0 W-1 87 6.56E+3 5.48E+3 - 1.80E+6 1.92E+3 Np-239 3.66E+0 3.60E-1 - 1.12E+0 7.39E+4 1.98E-1 2-32 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.12 R1 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mrem/yr per igCVm 3) for H-3 and C-14 (M2 x mrem/yr Cli/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 Na-24 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 4.44E+6 P-32 3.15E+10 1.95E+9 - 2.65E+9 1.22E+9 Cr-51 2.78E+4 1.10E+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5.OOE+4 Mn-54 1.40E+7 - 4.17E+6 2.87E+7 2.78E+6 Mn-56 7.51 E-3 - 9.50E-3 - 4.94E-1 1.33E-3 Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 - 2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59 5.20E+7 1.21 E+8 - 3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 - 2.25E+6 - - 4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 7.95E+6 - 1.1OE+8 1.83E+7 Co-60 - 2.78E+7 - - 3.62E+8 6.26E+7 Ni-63 1.18E+10 8.35E+8 - - 1.33E+8 4.01 E+8 Ni-65 6.78E-1 8.66E-2 - 4.70E+0 3.94E-2 Cu-64 - 4.29E+4 - 1.09E+5 3.33E+6 2.02E+4 Zn-65 2.11 E+9 7.31 E+9 - 4.68E+9 3.1 OE+9 3.41 E+9 Zn-69 - - - -

Br-82 - - - 5.64E+7 Br-83 - - - 1.91 E-1 Br-84 Br-85 - - -

Rb-86 - 4.73E+9 - - 7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Rb-88 -- - -

Rb-89 - -.

Sr-89 2.67E+9 --- 3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90 6.61E+10 -- - 1.86E+9 1.63E+10 Sr-91 5.75E+4 -- - 2.61 E+5 2.29E+3 Sr-92 8.95E-1 - - - 2.28E+1 3.81 E-2 Y-90. 1.30E+2 - - - 1.07E+6 3.50E+0 Y-91m ....

Y-91 1.58E+4 - - - - 6.48E+6 4.24E+2 Y-92 1.OOE-4 .... 2.75E+O 2.90E-6 Y-93 4.30E-1 - - - 1.31E+4 1.18E-2 Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 7.67E+2 1.20E+6 3.59E+2 Zr-97 7.75E-1 1.53E-1 - 2.32E-1 4.15E+4 7.06E-2 Nb-95. 1.41 E+5 7.80E+4 7.57E+4 3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Nb-97 -- - 6.34E-8 -

Mo-99 4.56E+7 1.04E+8 - 8.16E+7 8.69E+6 Tc-99rn 5.64E+O 1.57E+1 2.34E+2 8.73E+0 1.03E+4 2.04E+2 Tc-101 ....

2-33 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.12 Ri Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - TEEN (mremlyr per iACIlm 3) for H-3 and C-14 (M 2 x mremlyr gCl/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 1.81 E+3 - 6.40E+3 - 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 Ru-105 1.57E-3 - - 1.97E-2 - 1.26E+O 6.08E-4 Ru-106 3.75E+4 - - 7.23E+4 - 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Rh-103m - -

Rh-106 -- -

Ag-110m 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 1.74E+8 - 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 4.01 E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125 3.65E+7 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 3.21 E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m 3.OOE+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 8.86E+7 4.02E+6 Te-127m 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2.01E+7 3.42E+8 - 2.10E+8 1.OOE+7 Te-127 1.24E+3 4.41 E+2 8.59E+2 5.04E+3 - 9.61 E+4 2.68E+2 Te-129m 1.11E+8 4.1OE+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 - 4.15E+8 1.75E+7 Te-129 - - 1.67E-9 - 2.18E-9 -

Te-131m 6.57E+5 3.15E+5 4.74E+5 3.29E+6 - 2.53E+7 2.63E+5 Te-131 .-..

Te-132 4.28E+6 2.71 E+6 2.86E+6 2.60E+7 8.58E+7 2.55E+6 1-130 7.49E+5 2.17E+6 1.77E+8 3.34E+6 1.67E+6 8.66E+5 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2.20E+11 1.30E+9 1.49E+8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+O 3.31E-1 2.72E-1 1-133 7.24E+6 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 9.30E+6 3.75E+6 1-134 ....

1-135 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 Cs-134 9.81 E+9 2.31 E+10 7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+10 6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 Cs-138 - - -

Ba-139 8.69E-8 7.75E-7 2.53E-9 Ba-140 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 2.02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 Ba-141 - - -

Ba-142 - - -

La-140 8.06E+0 3.96E+O - 2.27E+5 1.05E+0 La-142 2.23E-7 -

Ce-141 8.87E+3 5.92E+3 2.79E+3 - 1.69E+7 6.81 E+2 Ce-143 7.69E+1 5.60E+4 2.51E+1 - 1.68E+6 6.25E+O Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 1.63E+5 - 1.66E+8 3.54E+4 Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 6.77E+1 - 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Pr-144 - --

Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 1.16E+2 - 7.11E+5 1.18E+1 W-187 1.20E+4 9.78E+3 - 2.65E+6 3.43E+3 Np-239 6.99E+O 6.59E-1 2.07E+0 - 1.06E+5 3.66E-1 2-34 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.13 R, Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per i.CIIm3) for H-3 and C-1 4 (m2 x mremlyr igCi/sec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 1.65E+6 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 Na-24 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 9.23E+6 P-32 7.77E+10 3.64E+9 - 2.15E+9 3.OOE+9 Cr-51 5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41 E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 2.09E+7 - 5.87E+6 1.76E+7 5.58E+6 Mn-56 1.31E-2 - 1.58E-2 1.90E+O 2.95E-3 Fe-55 1.12E+8 5.93E+7 - 3.35E+7 1.10E+7 1.84E+7 Fe-59 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 - 5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71 E+7 Co-57 3.84E+6 -- - 3.14E+7 7.77E+6 Co-58 1.21 E+7 -- - 7.08E+7 3.72E+7 Co-60 4.32E+7 - - -. 2.39E+8 1.27E+8 Ni-63 2.96E+1 0 1.59E+9 - - - 1.07E+8 1.01 E+9 Ni-65 1.66E+0 1.56E-1 - - - 1.91E+1 9.11 E-2 Cu-64 7.55E+4 - 1.82E+5 - 3.54E+6 4.56E+4 Zn-65 4.13E+9 1.10E+10 - 6.94E+9 - 1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Zn-69 - - 2.14E-9 Br-82 - - 1.15E+8 Br-83 - - 4.69E-1 Br-84 -- -- -

Br-85 -- -

Rb-86 - 8.77E+9 - - 5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Rb-88 - - - -

Rb-89 - - - -

Sr-89 6.62E+9 - - 2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+11 - - - - 1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Sr-91 1.41 E+5 - - - - 3.12E+5 5.33E+3 Sr-92 2.19E+O - - - - 4.14E+1 8.76E-2 Y-90 3.22E+2 - - - 9.15E+5 8.61 E+O Y-91m - - --

Y-91 3.91 E+4 - 5.21 E+6 1.04E+3 Y-92 2.46E-4 - 7.1OE+O 7.03E-6 Y-93 1.06E+O - 1.57E+4 2.90E-2 Zr-95 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 - 1.21 E+3 8.81 E+5 7.52E+2 Zr-97 1.89E+O 2.72E-1 - 3.91E-1 4.13E+4 1.61E-1 Nb-95 3.18E+5 1.24E+5 - 1.16E+5 2.29E+8 8.84E+4 Nb-97 - - 1.45E-6 -

Mo-99 8.29E+7 - 1.77E+8 6.86E+7 2.05E+7 Tc-99m 1.29E+1 2.54E+1 - 3.68E+2 1.29E+1 1.44E+4 4.20E+2 Tc-101 2-35 REV. 10 12/14/2006

- Table 2.13 R, Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per jtCI/m 3) for H-3 and C-14 (m 2 x mremlyr giCVsec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 4.29E+3 - 1.08E+4 1.11E+5 1.65E+3 Ru-105 3.82E-3 - 3.36E-2 2.49E+0 1.39E-3 Ru-106 9.24E+4 - 1.25E+5 1.44E+6 - 1.15E+4 Rh-103m Rh-l106 - -

Ag-110m 2.09E+8 1.41E+8 - 2.63E+8 1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41 E+8 2.40E+5 6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb-125 8.70E+7 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7 Te-125m 7.38E+7 2.OOE+7 2.07E+7 7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 ..- 1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-127 3.06E+3 8.25E+2 2.12E+3 8.71 E+3 - 1.20E+5 6.56E+2 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61 E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 - 3.32E+8 4.23E+7 Te-129 - - 2.87E-9 - 6.12E-8 -

Te-131m 1.60E+6 5.53E+5 1.14E+6 5.35E+6 - 2.24E+7 5.89E+5 Te-131 .....

Te-1 32 1.02E+7 4.52E+6 6.58E+6 4.20E+7 - 4.55E+7 5.46E+6 1-130 1.75E+6 3.54E+6 3.90E+8 5.29E+6 - 1.66E+6 1.82E+6 1-131 1.30E+9 1.31EE+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 - 1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+O - 1.48E+O 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E+7 2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 - 8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 - - -

1-135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61 E+5 - 8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 Cs-134 2.26E+10 3.71E+10 1.15E+10 4.13E+9 2.OOE+8 7.83E+9 Cs-136 1.00E+9 2.76E+9 1.47E+9 2.19E+8 9.70E+7 1.79E+9 Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 1.01E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 Cs-138 - - -

Ba-139 2.14E-7 - - 1.23E-5 6.19E-9 Ba-140 1.17E+8 1.03E+5 3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 Ba-141 - -

Ba-142 - - - -

La-140 1.93E+1 6.74E+0 - - 1.88E+5 2.27E+0 La-142 - - 2.51 E-6 Ce-141 2.19E+4 1.09E+4 - 4.78E+3 - 1.36E+7 1.62E+3 Ce-143 1.89E+2 1.02E+5 - 4.29E+1 - 1.50E+6 1.48E+1 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 - 2.82E+5 - 1.33E+8 8.66E+4 Pr-143 7.23E+2 2.17E+2 - 1.17E+2 - 7.80E+5 3.59E+1 Pr-144 - - -

Nd-147 4.45E+2 3.60E+2 1.98E+2 - 5.71E+5 2.79E+1 W-1 87 2.91 E+4 1.72E+4 2.42E+6 7.73E+3 Np-239 1.72E+1 1.23E+0 3.57E+0 - 9.14E+4 8.68E-1 2-36 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.14 R1 Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors "INFANT

3) for H-3 and C-1 4 (M 2 x mrem/yr jiCi/sec) for others (mrem/yr per gCVim Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body H-3 - 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 C-14 3.23E+6 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 Na-24 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 1.61E+7 P-32 1.60E+11 9.42E+9 - 2.17E+9 6.21 E+9 Cr-51 1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71 E+6 1.61 E+5 Mn-54 - 3.89E+7 8.63E+6 1.43E+7 8.83E+6 Mn-56 - 3.21 E-2 2.76E-2 2.91 E+0 5.53E-3 Fe-55 1.35E+8 8.72E+7 4.27E+7 1.11 E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8 1.16E+8 1.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 - 8.95E+6 - 3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co-58 - 2.43E+7 - 6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 - 8.81 E+7 - 2.1 OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 3.49E+10 2.16E+9 - 1.07E+8 1.21 E+9 Ni-65 3,51E+0 3.97E-1 - 3.02E+1 1.81E-1 Cu-64 - 1.88E+5 3.17E+5 - 3.85E+6 8.69E+4 Zn-65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 9.23E+9 1.61E+10 8.78E+9 Zn-69 - - - - 7.36E-9 -

Br-82 - - - - 1.94E+8 Br-83 - - - - 9.95E-1 Br-84 - - - -

Br-85 - - -

Rb-86 - 2.22E+10 - 5.69E+8 1.10E+10 Rb-88 - - -

Rb-89 - - -

Sr-89 1.26E+10 - - - 2.59E+8 3.61 E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+11 - -- 1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Sr-91 2.94E+5 - -- 3.48E+5 1.06E+4 Sr-92 4.65E+0 - - 5.01 E+1 1.73E-1 Y-90 6.80E+2 -- - 9.39E+5 1.82E+1 Y-91m - -

Y-91 7.33E+4 - - 5.26E+6 1.95E+3 Y-92 5.22E-4 - 9.97E+O 1.47E-5 Y-93 2.25E+0 - 1.78E+4 6.13E-2 Zr-95 6.83E+3 1.66E+3 1.79E+3 - 8.28E+5 1.18E+3 Zr-97 3.99E+0 6.85E-1 6.91 E-1 - 4.37E+4 3.13E-1 Nb-95 5.93E+5 2.44E+5 1.75E+5 - 2.06E+8 1.41 E+5 Nb-97 - - 3.70E-6 Mo-99 2.12E+8 3.17E+8 - 6.98E+7 4.13E+7 Tc-99m 2.69E+1 5.55E+1 5.97E+2 2.90E+1 1.61E+4 7.15E+2 Tc-101 -

2-37 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.14 R, Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per p.Ci/m 3) for H-3 and C-1 4 (M 2 x mrerVyr pClisec) for others Nuclide Bone Liver Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI T.Body Ru-103 8.69E+3 - 1.81E+4 1.06E+5 2.91E+3 Ru-105 8.06E-3 - 5.92E-2 3.21 E+0 2.71 E-3 Ru-106 1.90E+5 - 2.25E+5 1.44E+6 2.38E+4 Rh-103m Rh-106 -

Ag-110m 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 4.03E+8 - 1.46E+10 1.86E+8 Sb-124 2.09E+8 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 1.31 E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 Sb-125 1.49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7 Te-125m 1.51 E+8 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 - 7.18E+7 2.04E+7 Te-127m 4.21E+8 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 - 1.70E+8 5.10E+7 Te-1 27 6.50E+3 2.18E+3 5.29E+3 1.59E+4 - 1.36E+5 1.40E+3 Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 - 3.34E+8 8.62E+7 Te-129 2.08E-9 - 1.75E-9 5.18E-9 - 1.66E-7 -

Te-131m 3.38E+6 1.36E+6 2.76E+6 9.35E+6 - 2.29E+7 1.12E+6 Te-131 - - -

Te-132 2.10E+7 1.04E+7 1.54E+7 6.51E+7 3.85E+7 9.72E+6 1-130 3.60E+6 7.92E+6 8.88E+8 8.70E+6 - 1.70E+6 3.18E+6 1-131 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 - 1.15E+8 1.41E+9 1-132 1.42E+O 2.89E+O 1.35E+2 3.22E+O - 2.34E+O 1.03E+0 1-133 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6.36E+7 - 9.16E+6 1.58E+7 1-134 - - 1.01E-9 - -

1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 - 8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9 Cs-137 5.15E+-10 6.02E+10 1.62E+10 6.55E+9 1.88E+8 4.27E+9 Cs-138 ....

Ba-139 4.55E-7 - 2.88E-5 1.32E-8 Ba-140 2.41 E+8 2.41E+5 5.73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+7 Ba-141 - -

Ba-142 - -

La-140 4.03E+1 1.59E+1 - 1.87E+5 4.09E+0 La-142 - - 5.21E-6 -

Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 - 8.15E+3 - 1.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-143 4.OOE+2 2.65E+5 7.72E+1 - 1.55E+6 3.02E+1 Ce-144 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 - 3.85E+5 - 1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E+3 5.59E+2 - 2.08E+2 - 7.89E+5 7.41 E+1 Pr-144 .-

Nd-1 47 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 - 3.49E+2 5.74E+5 5.55E+1 W-187 6.12E+4 4.26E+4 - - 2.50E+6 1.47E+4 Np-239 3.64E+1 3.25E+0 - 6.49E+0 9.40E+4 1.84E+0 2-38 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.15 R1 Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m 2 x mrem/yr per tCI/sec)

Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-1 4 Na-24 1.21 E+7 P-32 _

Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Mn-56 9.05E+5 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-57 4.37E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+10 Ni-63 Ni-65 2.97E+5 Cu-64 6.09E+5 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Zn-69 I Br-82 4.57E+7 Br-83 4.89E+3 Br-84 2.03E+5 Br-85 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Rb-88 3.29E+4 Rb-89 1.21 E+5 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 Sr-91 2.19E+6 Sr-92 7.77E+5 Y-90 4.48E+3 Y-91m 1.01 E+5 Y-91 1.08E+6 Y-92 1.80E+5 Y-93 1.85E+5 Zr-95 2.48E+8 Zr-97 2.94E+6 Nb-95 1.36E+8 Nb-97 2.28E+6 Mo-99 4.05E+6 Tc-99m 1.83E+5 Tc-101 2.04E+4 Ru-103 1.09E+8 2-39 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table 2.15 RI Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (M 2 x mremlyr per lgCi/sec)

Nuclide Any Organ Ru-105 6.36E+5 Ru-106 4.21 E+8 Rh-103m _

Rh-106 Ag-110m 3.47E+9 Sb-1 24 2.87E+9 Sb-125 6.49E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 Te-127 3.OOE+3 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 Te-129 2.60E+4 Te-131m 8.03E+6 Te-131 2.93E+4 Te-132 4.22E+6 1-130 5.53E+6 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6 Cs-134 6.75E+9 Cs-136 1.49E+8 Cs-137 1.04E+10 Cs-i 38 3.59E+5 Ba-139 1.06E+5 Ba-140 2.05E+7 Ba-141 4.18E+4 Ba-142 4.49E+4 La-140 1.91 E+7 La-142 7.36E+5 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-143 2.32E+6 Ce-144 .6.95E+7 Pr-143 Pr-144 1.83E+3 Nd-147 8.40E+6 W-187 2.36E+6 Np-239 1.71 E+6 2-40 REV. 10 12/14/2006

3/4 RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT SPECIFICATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS 3.0.1 Compliance with the specifications contained in the succeeding text is required during the conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet the specifications, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.

3.0.2 Noncompliance with a Specification shall exist when its requirements and associated ACTION requirements are not met within the specified time intervals. If the Specification is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the Action requirements is not required:

3.0.3 When a Specification is not met, except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, reporting pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3 will be initiated.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0.1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the conditions specified for individual Specifications unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.

4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified time interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval.

4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the specified time interval shall constitute a failure to meet the OPERABILITY requirements for a Specification. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual Specification. Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.

3-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

3/4.1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.1 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in Section 1.0 of the OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).

APPLICABILITY During release via the monitored pathway.

ACTION

a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above specification, without delay suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.1.

Exert best efforts to return the instruments to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.1.

BASIS Radioactive Liquid Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation - The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding ten (10) times the values of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. The operability and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the appropriate requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.

3-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

3/4.2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS 3.2 The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.2 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of ODCM Specification 3.4.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be deterrnined in accordance with the methodology in section 2.0 of the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY As shown in Table 3.2.

ACTION

a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above Specification, without delay suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.2.

Exert best efforts to return the instruments to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.2 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.2.

BASIS Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation - The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the dose rate limits of ODCM Specification 3.4.1. The operability and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the appropriate requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.

3-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

3/4.3 LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONCENTRATION SPECIFICATIONS 3.3.1 The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to ten times the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 104V Ci/ml total activity.

APPLICABILITY During release via the monitored pathway.

ACTION With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the concentration to within the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3;1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program of Table 4.3.

4.3.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of ODCM Specification 3.3. 1.

BASIS Concentration - This specification is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than ten times the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.1301 to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its concentration limit in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)

Publication 2.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually), Currie, L.A., "Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination - Application to Radiochemistry," Anal. Chem. 40, 586-93 (1968), and Hartwell, J.K., "Detection Limits for Radioanalytical Counting Techniques," Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Report ARH-SA-215 (June 1975).

3-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

DOSE SPECIFICATIONS 3.3.2 The dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited:

a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification (TS) 6.9.b.3, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM once per 31 days.

BASIS Dose - This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections lI.A, IH.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section UI.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.

3-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS 3.3.3 The liquid radwaste treatment system as described in the ODCM shall be used to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid wastes prior to their discharge when the projected doses, due to the liquid effluent, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS would exceed 0.18 mrem to the total body or 0.62 rnrem to any organ in a calendar quarter.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3 Doses due to liquid releases from the unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

BASIS Liquid Radwaste Treatment System - The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This specification implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.

3-6 REV. 10 12/14/2006 .

3/4.4 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE RATE SPECIFICATIONS 3.4.1 The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-13 1, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, without delay restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS -

4.4.1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

4.4.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.4.

3-7 REV. 10 12/14/2006

BASIS Dose Rate - This specification is provided to ensure that the dose rates at any time to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are less than or equal to 500 mrem/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. This also restricts releases, at all times, for the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr.

These dose rate limits provide additional assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will be maintained ALARA, and coupled with the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.4.2, ensure that the exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA, either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, will not exceed the annual average concentrations specified in Appendix B, Table 2, Column 1 of 10 CFR 20. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of that MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in gaseous waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually), Currie, L.A., "Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination - Application to Radiochemistry," Anal. Chem. 40, 586-93 (1968), and Hartwell, J.K., "Detection Limits for Radioanalytical Counting Techniques," Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Report ARH-SA-215 (June 1975).

3-8 REV. 10 12/14/2006

DOSE - NOBLE GASES SPECIFICATIONS 3.4.2 The air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in'lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM once per 31 days.

BASIS Dose - Noble Gases - This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix 1, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section IlI.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors,"

Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.

3-9 REV. 10 12/14/2006

DOSE - IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM SPECIFICATIONS 3.4.3 The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.3 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM once per 31 days.

BASIS Dose - Iodine-131, Iodine-133, Tritium, and Radionuclides in Particulate Form -

This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Conditions for Operation are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable."

3-10 REV. 10 12/14/2006

The ODCM calculational methods specified in the Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of.

Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate specifications for iodine-131, iodine- 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days are dependent upon the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy 'areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.

3-11 REV. 10 12/14/2006

GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS 3.4.4 The GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous --

effluent air doses due to gaseous effluent releases to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY would exceed 0.62 mrad for gamma radiation and 1.25 mrad for beta radiation in a calendar quarter. The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY would exceed 0.94 mrem to any organ in a calendar quarter.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Explanation of why gaseous radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.4 Doses due to gaseous releases from areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

3-12 REV. 10 12/14/2006

BASIS Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System - The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable."

This specification implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Sections II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

3-13 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-i 3/4.5 TOTAL DOSE SPECIFICATIONS 3.5 The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE -

PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem.

APPLICABILITY At all times.

ACTION

a. With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.2.a, 3.3.2.b, 3.4.2.a, 3.4.2.b, 3.4.3.a, or 3.4.3.b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor unit to determine whether the above limits have been exceeded. If such is the case in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to TS 6.9.b.3, a special report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This special report as defined in 10 CFR 20.2203, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the special report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.5.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with Surveillance Requirements 4.3.2, 4.4.2, and 4.4.3 in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

4.5.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor unit shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

This requirement is applicable only under conditions set forth in ODCM Specification 3.5.a. -

3-14 REV. 10 12/14/2006

BASIS Total Dose - This specification is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525. The specification requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant generated radioactive, effluents and direct radiation exceed 25 mrem to the totalbody or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem. It is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the reactor remains within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 limits. For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190.11 and 10 CFR 20.2203, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in ODCM Specifications 3.3.1 and 3.4.1. An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.

3-15 REV. 10 12/14/2006

314.6 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 3/4.6.1 Radioactive Effluent Release Report The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include the following:

a. A summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit following the format of Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974.

b. An annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing on magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability4 . This same report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during the previous calendar year. The assumptions used in making these assessment, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location shall be included in these reports. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed based on the calculational guidance, as presented in the ODCM.

c. An assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources, including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation, the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation.

d. A list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.

e. Any changes made during the reporting period to the ODCM.

4In lieu of submission with the annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, the licensee has the option of retaining this summary of required meteorological data on site in a tile that shall be provided to the NRC upon request.

3-16 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 3.1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION Minimum Instrument Channels Action Operable

1. Gross Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line (R-1 8) 1

b. Steam Generator Blowdown Effluent Line (R-19) 1 2

2. Gross Beta or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm But Not Providing Automatic Termination of Release

a. Service Water System Effluent Line (Component cooling, R-20) 1 3

b. Service Water System Effluent Line (Containment fan cooling, R-16) 1 3 Action I - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may continue provided that prior to initiating a release:

a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with Surveillance Requirement 4.3. 1.1 and

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

Action 2 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a lower limit of detection of i.OE-6 uCi/ml:

a. At least once per week with no indication of primary-to-secondary leakage; or

b. At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months with identified primary-to-secondary leakage (with secondary side activity > i .OE-05 uCi/ml)

Action 3 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a lower limit of detection of I .OE-6 uCi/ml. (Note: Failure to complete sampling and analysis prior to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after the monitor is declared O.O.S. is a violation of this specification).

3-17 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 3.2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION (Page 1 of 2)

Minimum Instrument Channels Applicability Action Operable

1. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

a. R-13 or R-14

- Waste Gas Holdup System (auto-isolation)

- Auxiliary Building Ventilation System 1 *

- Containment Purge 2" line 4 (auto-isolation) 5

b. R-12 or R-21 6

- Containment purge 36" duct (auto-isolation) 6

c. R-15

-Condenser Evacuation System 5

2. Radioiodine & Particulate Samplers

a. Containment Building Vent (R-21)

b. Auxiliary Building Vent (R-13 or 1

7 R-14) 1

7

3. Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Devices

a. Containment Building Vent Sampler (R-21)

b. Auxiliary Building Vent Sampler 1

8 (R-13 or R-14) 1

8

At all times

__0 3-18 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 3.2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION (Page 2 of 2)

TABLE NOTATIONS Action 4 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment provided that prior to initiating the release:

a. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

Action 5 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for gross activity within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Action 6 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately suspend PURGING of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

Action 7 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via the affected pathway may continue provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary-sampling equipment as required in Table 4.4.

Action 8 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

3-19 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.0 FREQUENCY NOTATION Notation Frequencys S Once per shift St Once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months D Once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months W Once per 7 days M Once per 31 days Q Once per 92 days SA Once per 184 days R Once per refueling cycle, not to exceed 18 months P Prior to each reactor startup if not done previous week PR Completed prior to each release NA Not applicable

-0

-- w 5A maximum extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval.

3-20 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS Channel Channel Source Channel Functional Instrument Check Check Calibration Test Gross Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarmn and Automatic Termination of Release

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line (R-! 8) D PR R Q

b. Steam Generator Blowdown Effluent D M R Q Line (R- 19)

2. Gross Beta or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm But Not Providing Automatic Termination of Release

a. Service Water System Effluent Line D M R Q (Component cooling, R-20)

b. Service Water System Effluent Line D M R Q (Containment fan cooling, R- 16) 3-21 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS Channel Modes In Which Channel Source Channel Functional Surveillance Instrument Check Check Calibration Test Required

1. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

a. R-13 or R-14 Waste Gas Holdup System PR PR R Q (auto-isolation)

Auxiliary Building Ventilation D M R Q System Containment Purge 2" line D M R Q (auto-isolation)

b. R-12 or R-21 Containment purge 36" duct D PR R Q (auto-isolation)

c. R-15 Condenser Evacuation System D M R Q

2. Radioiodine Particulate Samplers

a. Containment Building vent W NA NA NA (R-2 1)

b. Auxiliary Building vent (R-13 W NA NA NA or R- 14)

3. Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Devices

-W.

a. Containment Building vent D NA R Q sampler (R-2 1)

b. Auxiliary Building vent sampler D NA R Q (R-13 or R-14)

At all times other than when the line is valved out and tagged.

3-22 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.3 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Page 1 of 2 Minimum Lower Limit of Sampling Analysis Type of Activity Detection (LLD)*

Liquid Release Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (IQCi/ml)

PR PR Principal Gamma Ix 10-6 A. Batch Waste Release Tanksb Each Batch Each Batch Emittersc 1-131 1x10"6 PR M H-3 1x10" Each Batch Composited Gross Alpha 5x 10-7 PR Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10.'

Each Batch Compositee Fe-55 Ix 106 B. Continuous Releasese W W Principal Gamma (SG Blowdown) Grab Sample Grab Sample Emitters' 5x10" (TB Sumps) 1-131 IxlO"6 W M H-3 wxa0s Compositer Gross Alpha 5x I 07 Grab Sample W Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x I0"6 Compositef Fe-55 Ix 10-Grab Sam le 3-23 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-0 TABLE 4.3 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Page 2 of 2 Table Notations a The LLD is defined, for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

LLD 4.66

s, E

V

2.22 x 106

Y

expA~ t)

Where:

0 LLD is the a priori lower limit of detection as defined above, as gxCi per unit mass or volume, a sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, a E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, a V is the sample size in units of mass or volume,

2.22 x 106 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, 0 Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

?, is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and

At for plant effluents is the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting.

Typical values of E, V, Y and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a orio (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

b A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analysis, each batch shall be located, and then thoroughly mixed to ensure representative sampling.

c The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to TS 6.9.b.2.

d A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.

e A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume, e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.

f As a minimum, the monthly and quarterly composite samples shall be comprised of weekly grab samples.

g During periods of identified primary-to-secondary leakage (with the secondary activity > 1.01E-05 ptCi/ml),

grab samples are collecied daily and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

3-24 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.4 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Page 1 of 2 Lower Limit of Minimum Detection Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)_a Sampling Gaseous Release Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (TACi/mL)

A. Waste Gas Storage PR PR Principal Gamma lxl" Tank Each Tank Each Tank Emittersb Grab Sample PR PR Principal Gamma lx104 B. Containment PURGE Each Each Purge Emittersb PURGE Grab Sample C. Auxiliary Building and M M Principal Gamma Grab Emittersb I x 10-4 Containment Building Vent Sample W 1-131 3x10"'2 Continuousc Charcoal Sample W Principal Gamma 1x10"1 Continuousc Particulate Emitterb Sample (1-13 1, others)

M Gross Alpha 1xl0l" Continuous' Composite Particulate Sample Q SR-89, SR-90 1x l011 Continuous' Composite Patriculate Sample lxl0.6 Noble Gas Noble Gases Continuous' Monitor Gross Beta or Gamma 3-25 REV. 10 12/14/2006

TABLE 4.4 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Page 2 of 2

1. Table Notations a The LLD is defined, for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

4.66

s.

LLD =

E

V

2.22 x 106

Y* exp(-')

Where:

LLD is the a priori lower limit of detection as defined above, as AtCi per unit mass or volume, SSb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute,

E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration,

V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 0 2.22 x 106 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie,

Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, 0 X is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and

At for plant effluents is the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting.

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

b The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 for gaseous emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be -- d considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report Dursuant to TS 6.9.b.2.

C The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled flow stream flow rate shall be known (based on sampler and ventilation system flow measuring devices or periodic flow estimates) for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with ODCM Specifications 3.4.1, 3.4.2, and 3.4.3.

3-26 REV. 10 12/14/2006

APPENDIX A TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS - LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS A-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -

Liquid Effluent Releases To verify that the current approach to determining environmental doses using a simplified method has remained consistent since the previous analysis (performed using effluent data from 1981-1983), a similar evaluation was performed using the liquid effluent release data from 2000-2002. From the effluent data, the dose contribution of the radionuclide mixture can be obtained to provide a simplified method of determining compliance with the dose limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.2. For the radionuclide distribution of effluents from the Kewaunee Power I'w Station, the controlling organ is either the GI-LLI or the liver. The calculated GI-LLI dose is almost exclusively dictated by the Nb-95 releases; the liver dose is mostly a function of the Cs-134 and Fe-55 releases. The radionuclides, Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Sr-90, and Cs-137 contribute essentially all of the calculated total body dose. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table A-1. The individual nuclide doses used in the dose comparisons of Table A-i were calculated using the total curies released via batch and continuous releases as reported in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, weighted by the appropriate dose factors.

Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is negligible. From 2000-2002, the maximum tritium release from the Kewaunee Nuclear Plant to Lake Michigan was 270 curies.

The calculated total body dose from such a release is 1.36E-02 mrem/yr via the fish ingestion and drinking water pathways. This amounts to 0.07% of the design objective dose of 3 mrem/yr.

Furthermore, the release of tritium is a function of operating time and power level and is essentially unrelated to radwaste system operation.

For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculational process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculational process to the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculational method that is simplified while also being conservative.

While not present in the 2000-2002 liquid effluent releases, it still remains conservative to use the Cs-134 dose conversion factor (7.09E+05 mrem/hr per tCi/ml, liver) to evaluate the maximum organ dose. Only the reactor-generated radionuclide Nb-95 has a higher dose conversion factor (1.51E+06 mrem/hr per gCi/ml, GI-LLI). However, since Nb-95 releases are typically less than 5% of the total releases, it is conservative to use the Cs-134 factor. By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be routinely overestimated. For 2000, using this simplified conservative method (CW value of 2.00E+05 gpm) would overestimate the maximum organ dose as reported in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report by a factor of 234; for 2001, the conservatism is a factor of 109; and for 2002, a factor of 730. This comparison is shown in Table A-2.

A-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

For the total body calculation, the Cs-134 dose factor (5.79E+05 mrem/hr per iCi/ml, total body) is again used since it is higher than the identified dominant nuclides. For 2000, using this simplified conservative dose calculational method would overestimate the total body dose by a factor of 253; for 2001, the conservatism is a factor of 105;

, I and for 2002, a factor of 601.

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM Specification 3.3.2 the following simplified equations may be used:

Total Body DIb = L.6 7 E-O 2 x VOLAs-34BX X EC1 (A.1) cw where:

Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)

Ac,-134,TB = 5.79E+05, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Cs-134 (mrem/hr per.

RICi/mi)

VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal)

= total concentration of all radionuclides (ItCi/ml)

CW = average circulating water discharge rate during release period (gal/min) 1.67E-02 = conversion factor (hr/min)

Substituting the value for the Cs-134 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplifies to:

Dtb= 9.67E + 03x VOL x 14$Ci (A.2) xCW Maximum Organ 1.67E-02xVOLx Ac5. u. Lx EC (A.3)

CW where:

Dmax - maximum organ dose (mrem)

Acs-134,L = 7.09E+05, liver ingestion dose conversion factor for Cs-134 (mrem/hr per gCi/ml)

A-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Substituting the value for Acs.134.U.', the equation simplifies to:

Dinax = I.'8E+04xVOL X-Ci (A.4)

CW Only the total body dose need be evaluated by this simplified method since it represents the more limiting (compared with the maximum organ dose) for demonstrating compliance with ODCM Specification 3.3.2.

-J,

-- I A-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

f I r(r - (: ( ( r (I , f. I I? r , f, f, Table A-1 Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Drinking Water Pathways 2000 2001 2002 Radio. Release TB GI-LLI Liver Release TB GI-LLI Liver Release TB GI-LLI Liver nuclide (Ci) Dose Dose Dose (Ci) Dose Dose Dose (Ci) Dose Dose Dose Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac. Frac.

Fe-55 4.81E- 0.03 0.02 0.10 4.85E- 0.04 0.03 0.13 3.69E- 0.19 0.02 0.84 02 02 02 Co-58 8.07E- 0.01 0.03 *4.09E- 0.01 0.02 4.94E- 0.05 0.02 0.02 03 03 03 Fe-59 2.77E- * , , 2.44E- 1.65E- 0.01 0.02 04 04 04 Co-60 4.71E- 0.02 0.04 0.01 431E 0.02 0.05 0.01 2.07E- 0.06 0.02 0.03 03 03 03 Br-82 4.94E- 0.01 1.44E- NID 04 04 Sr-90 2.25E- 0.18 0.01 *2.50E- 0.25 0.01 *976E- 0.63 *

04 04 05 _

Nb-95 3.41E- , 0.89

2.39E-

0.86

2.45E- , 0.91

04 _04 04. _ 1 Cs-137 3.70E- 0.75 0.01 0.88 .74E- 0.68 0.01 0.85 3.04E- 0.05

0.08 04 04 06

Less than 0.01 N/D - not detected A-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table A-2 Adult Liver and Total Body Dose Assessment Dose Via the Simplified.Method Versus the Actual Calculated Dose 2000 2001 2002 Simplified Liver Dose (mRem)* 1.16E+00 9.87E-01 7.88E-01 Actual Liver Dose (mRem)** 4.97E-03 9.02E-03 1.08E-03 Simplified divided by Actual 234 109 730 Simplified Total Body Dose (mRem)

9.53E-01 8.09E-01 6.46E-01 Actual Total Body Dose (mRem)

- 3.77E-03 7.73E-03 1.07E-03 Simplified divided by Actual 253 105 601

Assuming 2.003E+05 gpm circulating water flow

- From the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report

-a A-6 REV. 10 12/14/2006

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS -

GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS B-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-. i APPENDIX B Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors -

Gaseous Radioactive Effluents Overview The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors, which are radionuclide specific. These effective factors, which can be based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity released to approximate the dose in the environment (i.e., instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analyses only a single multiplication (K.,f Miff or Neff) times the total quantity of radioactive material released would be needed). This approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculational technique.

Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:

Keff = Z (Kix fi) (B.1) where:

= the effective total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released

= the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide "i" released ft = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide "i" relative to the total noble gas activity (L+1.1M~ff =ZI(Li+l.lMi)xfiJ- (B.2) where:

(L +1. 1M)efr = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble gases released (1,+ 1. 1 M) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide "i" released Meff = E (Mixfi) (B.3) where:

Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released B-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide "i" released Neff = y (N xfi) (B.4) where:

Nrff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide "i" released Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Kewaunee have been maintained to such negligible quantities that the inherent variability in the data makes any meaningful evaluations difficult. For the years of 2000, 2001 and 2002, the total noble gas releases have been limited to 2.54E-04 Ci for 2000, i.37E-01 Ci for 2001, and 1.91E-02 Ci for 2002. Therefore, in order to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the primary coolant source term from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source Term Specifications," has been used as representing a typical distribution. The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table B- 1.

Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose calculational process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not significantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment.

For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of ODCM Specification 3.4.2, the following simplified equations may be used:

D- = 3 .17 E-08xX/QxM xff Qi (B.5) 0.50 Do= 3 .17 E - 08 x:XQ x Neff x Qi (B.6) 0.50 where:

Dy = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)

Dp = air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)

X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m 3)

B-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006"

MfTI = 5.3E+02, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per tCi/rm 3)

Nat = 1.1 E+03, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per pCi/m 3 )

ZQ = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (tCi) 3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec) 0.50 = conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculational equations simplify to:

Di=3.5E-05xX/QxzQi (B.7) and D,#=7.OE-05xxIQx-Qa (B.8)

The effective dose factors are used on a very limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable. Dose assessments using the detailed, radionuclide dependent calculation are performed at least annually for preparation of the Radioactive Effluent Reports. Comparisons can be performed at this time to assure that the use of the effective dose factors does not substantially underestimate actual doses.

-j B-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Table B-i Effective Dose Factors - Noble Gases Total Body Effective Skin Effective Dose Factor Dose Factor Kwf (L+I.1 M)n Radionuclide fi (mrem/yr per j+/-Ci/m 3) (mrem/yr per jgCi/m 3)

Noble Gases - Total Body and Skin Kr-85 0.01 -- 1.4E+01 Kr-88 0.01 1.5E+02 1.9E+02 Xe-133m 0.01 2.5E+00 1.4E+01 Xe-133 0.9 3.0E+02 6.6E+02 Xe-135 0.02 3.6E+01 7.9E+01 TOTAL 14.8E+02 9.6E+02 Noble Gases - Air Gamma Air Effective Beta Air Effective Dose Factor Dose Factor MKff Nfr Radionuclide fi (mrad/yr per gCiC/m 3) (mrad/yr per pCi/m 3)

Kr-85 0.01 -- 2.OE+01 Kr-88 0.01 1.5E+02 2.9E+01 Xe-133m 0.01 3.3E+00 1.5E+01 Xe-133 0.95 3.4E+02 1.OE+03 Xe- 135 0.02 3.8E+01 4.9E+01 TOTAL 5.3E+02 1.1EE+03 B-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-so APPENDIX C EVALUATION OF CONSERVATIVE, DEFAULT EFFECTIVE EC VALUE FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS

-J

-J C-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Appendix C Evaluation of Conservative, Default Effective EC Value for Liquid Effluents In accordance with the requirements of ODCM Specification 3.1 the radioactive liquid effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed 10 times the value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 for all radionuclides other than noble gases and a value of 2X10-4 VCi/ml for noble gases. The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual radionuclide distribution and corresponding EC values.

In order to limit the need for routinely having to reestablish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established. This default setpoint can be conservatively based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution of the liquid effluents from Kewaunee and the EC, value for this distribution.

The effective EC value for a radionuclide distribution can be calculated by the equation:

EC.= -- CC1 (C.I)

ECi where:

EC, = an effective EC value for a mixture of radionuclide (gCi/ml)

Ci = concentration of radionuclide "i" in the mixture ECi = the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 EC value for radionuclide "i" (RCi/ml)

Based on the above equation and the radionuclide distribution in the effluents for past years from Kewaunee, an EC, value can be determined. Effluent release data from 2000-2002 was used to generate the results presented in Table C-1. The most limiting effective EC (for gamma emitting radionuclides) was for the calendar year 2001, with a calculated value of 5.98E-06 pCi/ml. For conservatism in establishing the alarm setpoints, a default effective EC value of 1.OE-06 gCi/mnl was selected. The overall conservatism of this value is reaffirmed for future releases considering that 1.OE-06 pCi/ml is as or more restrictive than the individual EC values for the principal fission and activation products of Co-58, Co-60 and Cs-137. Overall, use of this effective EC value provides a factor of six (6) conservatism based on the 2000-2002 radionuclide distribution for gamma emitters.

C-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Being a non-gamma emitter, tritium is not detected by the effluent monitor. While tritium accounts for nearly all of the activity, it is not a significant contributor when determining the alarm setpoint for release rate evaluations. Examining releases over the years 2000-2002, the average, diluted H-3 contribution to its limiting concentration (i.e., fraction of concentration limit - 10 x EC) in liquid effluents was 0.004%. This contribution is not expected to change significantly over time, since the concentration of H-3 in effluents can be expected to remain fairly consistent in effluent releases regardless of fuel conditions, activation product releases, and waste processing.

Based on relative abundances, other non-gamma emitting radionuclides (Fe-55 and Sr-89/90) contributed up to 30% of the concentration limit (30% for CY 2001). It is reasonable to assume that the abundances of these non-gammas will remain the same relative to other fission and/or activation products under varying conditions.. Therefore, under conditions of elevated effluent radionuclide levels, the gamma-emitting radionuclides can be expected to be the main contributors to limiting conditions on liquid effluent concentrations, as established in Technical Specification 6.16.b. 1.B and ODCM Specifications 3.3.1. Note that including the non-gammas (excluding tritium) in the evaluation results in a higher effective EC value.

Therefore, under conditions of elevated effluent levels, the main contributor to the limiting conditions of the liquid effluent concentration would be the gamma-emitting radionuclides. The factor of six (6) conservatism in the effective EC determination (discussed above) provides adequate consideration for the contribution from non-gamma emitting radionuclides, and provides a conservative basis for establishing an alarm setpoint consistent with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.16.b. .B and ODCM Specifications 3.3.1.

-J

-I C-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

f If I rf I _ f f I Table C-i Calculation of Effective EC (ECe)

EC Ri 2000 , 2001 Ra2002 (tpCi/fml) Release Release Release

, (C,) , CiECi, Frac. (C) Ci/ECi, Frac. , (Ci) CiECi, Frac.

Na-24 5.OOE-05 1.03E-03 2.06E+-0I 4.89E-03 2.18E-04 4.35E+00 1.27E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 Cr-51 5.OOE-04 1.44E-03 2.89E+00 6.85E-04 8.26E-04 1.65E+00 4.83E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Mn-54 3.OOE-05 1.49E-04 4.97E+00 1.18E-03 3.30E-04 1.1OE+01 3.22E-03 6.41E-05 2.14E+00 9.83E-04 Fe-55 1.OOE-04 4.81E-02 4.81E+02 1.14E-01 4.85E-02 4.85E+02 1.42E-01 3.69E-02 3.69E+02 1.70E-01 Co-57 6.OOE-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.42E-05 4.03E-01 1.18E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 Co-58 2.OOE-05 8.07E-03 4.04E+02 9.59E-02 4.09E-03 2.05E+02 5.99E-02 4.94E-03 2.47E+02 1.14E-01 Fe-59 1.OOE-05 2.77E-04 2.77E+-01 6.57E-03 2.44E-04 2.44E+01 7.14E-03 1.65E-04 1.65E+01 7.61E-03 Co-60 3.OOE-06 4.71E-03 1.57E+03 3.73E-01 4.31E-03 1.44E+03 4.21E-01 2.07E-03 6.89E+02 3.17E-01 Br-82 4.OOE-05 4.94E-04 1.23E+01 2.93E-03 1.44E-04 3.59E+00 1.05E-03 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Sr-89 8.OOE-06 3.42E-04 4.27E+01 1.01E-02 2.59E-04 3.24E+01 9.48E-03 5.98E-04 7.48E+01 :3.44E-02 Sr-90 5.OOE-07 2.25E-04 4.50E+02 1.07E-01 2.50E-04 5.OOE+02 1.46E-01 9.76E-05 1.95E+02 8.98E-02 Zr-95 2.OOE-05 1.16E-04 5.79E+00 1.38E-03 7.18E-05 3.59E+00 1.05E-03 5.24E-05 2.62E+00 1.20E-03 Nb-95 3.OOE-05 3.41E-04 1.14E+01 2.70E-03 2.39E-04 7.95E+00 2.33E-03 2.45E-04 8.17E+00 3.76E-03 Ag-il0m 6.OOE-06 2.85E-03 4.74E+02 1.13E-01 1.63E-03 2.72E+02 7.97E-02 2.86E-03 4.76E+02 2.19E-01 Sn-113 3.OOE-05 9.65E-05 3.22E+00 7.64E-04 5.08E-05 1.69E+00 4.95E-04 7.06E-05 2.35E+00 1.08E-03 Sb-124 7.O0E-06 5.61E-04 8.O1E+01 1.90E-02 1.81E-04 2.59E+01 7.59E-03 4.34E-05 6.20E+00 2.85E-03 Sb-125 3.OOE-05 4.86E-03 1.62E+02 3.85E-02 1.02E-03 3.41E+01 9.99E-03 2.46E-03 8.18E+01 3.76E-02 1-132 1.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 7.75E-08 7.75E-04 2.27E-07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1-133 7.OOE-06 6.16E-04 8.80E+01 I 2.09E-02 6.32E-04 9.03E+01 2.65E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1-135 3.OOE-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.61E-05 1.54E+00 4.50E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs-137 1.OOE-06 3.70E-04 3.70E+02 8.78E-02 2.74E-04 2.74E+02 8.02E-02 3.04E-06 3.04E+00 1.40E-03 Total 7.46E-02 4.21E+03 1.OOE+00 6.34E-02 3.42E+03 1.OOE+00 5.06E-02 2.17E+03 1.OOE+00 on-Gamma Fraction _ __,_ 0.23 ,' ,' _ 0.30 ', ,

0.29 Gamma Fraction ,_,_0.77 0.70 , 0.71 ECe (laCi/mI, total) 1.77E-05 i 1.86E-05 2.33E-05 ECe (pCi/ml, gammas) 8.03E-06 i 5.98E-06, 8.44E-06 C-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Site N1a'ps

-d j3V -.0 PIP"41200

Appendix D Site Maps Plant drawing A-408, "Radiological Survey Site Map" depicts the site area by illustrating the site boundary and the restricted areas. Plant drawing A-449, "Plan of Plant Area, Fence, Lighting, and CCTV SupportStructure" shows the layout of the site buildings. Members of the public are restricted from access to all areas of the Owner Controlled Area (OCA).

Figure D-1 presents the locations and elevations of radioactive effluent release points at the plant. The plant drawings referenced above are not included as part of the ODCM but can be found in the plant drawing system.

D-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

A = CONTAINMENT BUILDING VENT ELEVATION 775' B = AUXILARY BUILDING VENT ELEVATION 675' C = EFFLUENT LIOUID DISCHARGE ELEVATION 580' 4J D-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006 I- , L ( I I I (. I 12/14/2006 I I I. {

I L ( I

APPENDIX E On-site Disposal of Low-Level Radioactively Contaminated Waste Streams E-1 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Appendix E consists of hard copies of the following reference documents:

DESCRIPTION DATE DOCKET NUMBER Operating License DPR-43 Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant October 17, 1991 NRC-91-148 Disposal of Low Level Radioactive 50-305 Material Proposed Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste Sludge Onsite at the June 17, 1992 K92-119 Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (TAC No. 50-305 M75047)

Safety Evaluation For An Amendment To An Approved 10 CFR 20.302 Application September 14, 1994 K-94-195 For The Kewaunee Nuclear Plant (TAC 50-305 No. M89719)

Alternate Disposal Of Contaminated Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge In November 13, 1995 K-95-172 Accordance With 10 CFR 20.2002 (TAC 50,305 No. M93844)

Onsite Disposal Of Contaminated Sludge K-97-64 Pursuant To 10 CFR 20.2002 (TAC No. April 9, 1997 50-305 M9741 1)

I Adapted from N E-2 REV. 10 12/14/2006

WPSC (414 43. 133, ',

ARc 91-149 TELECOPIER 147141 435-5544 WiSCONSIN PUBUC SERVICE CORPDRATION 900

o,'t'* .Z.7ar-$ 30 1 Wo

¶ .ree,ýey W1 543C7.S"C2 bec - K M Barlow. MGE J N Morrison D2 A J Ruege D2 N E Boys, WPL J R Mueller D2 C A Sc.brok ICNP Larry Nielsen, ANFC C S Smoker KNP D S Nlepka KNP D R Berg KNP L A Nuthals D2 (NSRAC) C RSteihrdt D2 D A Bollom 06 R P Pulec D2 I I Wallace KNP k E Drahcim KNP I S Richmond D2 K H Weinhauer ICNP K H Evers 02 D J Ristau D2 S F Wozniak D2 M L Marchi KNP D JTRo2?on XNP

-0 KP PJ/,j-- QA Vault KNP D L Masarik KNP "r-n kLe.g /*AP October 17, 1991

'U.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATfN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 7 Gentlemen:

Docket 50-305 Operating License DPR-43 Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant Disposal of Lo.w Level Radioactive Material Refercnccs: 1) Letter from K.H.Evers to Document Control Desk dated September 12, 1989

2) Letter from M.J.Davis to K.H.Evers dated February 13, 1990

3) Letter from L.Sridharon (WDNR) to M.Vandenbusch dated June 13, 1991 In reference 1, pursuant to the regulation of 10 CFR 20.302, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC) requested authorization for the alternative disposal of very-low-level radioactive materials from the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant. In reference 2, the US NRC identified additional questions that needed to be addressed in order to complete their review.

Attachment I provides our response to the questions.

WPSC requested the State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to review the disposal options for the service water pretreatment lagoon sludges. In reference 3, the WDNR completed a review of the most appropriate on site disposal methods for the slightly contaminated service water pretreatment lagoon sludges. The two proposed methogds that the WDNR evaluated included in-situ capping of the sludge in the wastewater treatment lagoon and on site landspreading. In Attachment 1, Appendix A, WPSC evaluated the on site landspreading E-3 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 Page 2 application which is our preferred disposal method. WPSC does not intend to utilize the in-situ capping of the sludge in the lagoon at this time. However, in the letter the WDNR agreed that either disposal method was acceptable provided:

- if the material is to be left in the lagoon, it would be capped in accordance with Wisconsin State statutes.

- if the on site landspreading option is utilized, the material would be spread by either disking into the soil or by spiking into the ground.

WPSC will abide by the WDNR landspreading, requirements which include locational and performance standards. Should there be any additional questions please feel free to contact a member of my staff.

Sincerely, C. A. Schrock Manager - Nuclear Engineering DJM!jrns Attach.

cc -. US NRC - Region I((

Mr. Patrick Castleman, US NRC LIC\,DJM\N492 E-4 REV. 10 12/14/2006

ATTACHMENT 1 To Letter from K" H. Evers (WPSC) to Document Control Desk (NRC)

Dated October 17, 1991 E-5 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991. , Page 1 References I) .etter from K. H. Evers to Document Control Desk dated September I, 1989.

NRC Question #1 On page 4 of your submittal, the average input to the Sewage Treatment System is approximately 11,000 gallons per day. In the Final Environmental Statement, this system is to be operated below its design capacity of 9,000 gallons per day. Discuss this deviation from the design capacity, and provide information to justify the higher output for this system.

WPSC Response -

The original Sewage Treatment System installed at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) was replaced in 1986 with a higher capacity system. The original system was designed for an onsite work force of around 150 people.

It was a limited capacity aerobic treatment system which included the onsite lagoon for additional retention. Because of this limited capacity and more stringent conditions on system effluent to Lake Michigan, an aerobic digester system was installed, which has a higher capacity, and uses current technology.

The estimated input volume to the Sewage Treatment System used in the September 12, 1989 application was 11,000 gallons per day. This value was based on past operating data. The increase in influent from the original design basis included in the Final Environmental Statemegt is due mainly to an increase in the number of individuals and facilities (e.g., training and simulator building) located onsite. Design changes to the system were required to accommodate these new facilities.

E-6 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 2 The current volumes of sewage sludge were used as the basis for the potential dose analysis and corresponding radionuclide concentration limits. This increase has no significant effect on the dose modeling. (Refer to the response to NRC Question #2, below.)

NRC Question #2 Provide information regarding how the disposal plan assures that the annual dose to any exposed individual will be kept below 1 mrem per year.

WPSC Response The dose pathway modeling used for determining the radioactive material concentration limits was based on NRC modeling. The computer code IMPACTS-BRC was used as the basis for calculating the potential doses from the alternative disposal methods. This modeling includes reasonable conservative exposure pathway scenarios for the various disposal methods.

Administrative controls will be established to ensure that the actual disposal of any slightly contaminated materials from KNP'P are within the bounds of the evaluation. Samples from each of the waste streams will be collected and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy prior to release for disposal. A system lower limit of detection (LLD) of 5E-07 tCi/ml for the principal gamma emitting radionuclides will be required. This LLD ensures the identification of any contaminated materials at a fraction of the allowable concentration limits for the alternative disposal.

The results of these analyses will be used to ensure that any detectable levels of radioactive material arc within the limits for alternative disposal. Any materials with levels of radioactive material above the concentration limits E-7 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk' October 17, 1991 , Page 3 (and of plant origin) will be treated as a radioactive waste and appropriately controlled.

Records will be maintained to ensure that the cumulative disposal of any contaminated materials are maintained within the bounds of the evaluation. In addition to a comparison of the individual radionuclide concentration limits, a record of the total amount of radioactive material disposed of will be maintained. Cumulative totals will be maintained to ensure that the total activity does not exceed the quantity assumed in the derivation of the limits.

In developing the concentration limits presented in Table 1 of reference 1, it was assumed the total annual design basis volume of 27.000 0 would be contaminated at the derived limit. The dose commitment from each radionuclide was individually evaluated as if it were the only radioactive material present. To determine if a mixture of radionuclides meets the limit, the sum-of-the-fractions rule should be applied (i.e., the sum of each radionuclide's concentration divided by its limiting concentration must be less than one).

The concentration limits of Table I of reference I also have an implied total activity limit. This limit is determined by multiplying the individual radionuclide concentration limit by the total estimated waste volume of 27,000 ft3 . These total activity limits are presented in Table A of this response, for each radionuclide individually. For a mixture of radionuclides, a total annual activity limit may be determined by normalizing the concentrations so that the sum-of-the-fractions for the nmixturc equals one (1). These resultant adjusted concentrations may be multiplied by the 27.000 ft3 waste volume to determine the corresponding toal activity limit of the mixture.

E-8 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 Attachmcnt 1, Page 4 A Disposal Log will be maintained on a calendar year basis for all disposals of any very-low-level radioactive materials. The log will contain as a minimum the following information:

" Disposal location

" Description of waste

" Shipment/disposal date

Waste volume

Radionuclide concentrations (gamma emitters)

Year-to-date radionuclide activity

- Year-to-date waste volume In addition to the above Disposal Log, a record file will be kept for eah individual disposal. This rile will contain, as a minimum, the following information:

- Waste identification

- Sample gamma spectroscopy results

Identified radionuclide concentrations and total activity NRC Question #3 Revise Appendix B, Section A of your submittal, 'Radiation Exposure During Transport,* by adding the cumulative dose to the exposed population per reactor year for both the transportation worker and the general public (onlookers along route).

WPSC Response The potential exposure to the general public (onlookers along route) is modeled by the IMPACTS-BRC code. As addressed in NUREG/CR-3585, this modeling is based on an integration of the source strength, an assumed E-9 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 Attachment I, Page 5 population density along route and vehicular speed. For a conservative evaluation of the potential exposure to the general public from the transport of the KNPP waste, a population density of 610 persons/mi 2 was assumed. This value is conservative for the KNPP site area where the average population density is less than 53 persons/mi 2 . A transport distance of 45 miles was assumed. The IMPACTS-BRC modeling assumes five (5) tons of material are transported per shipment. For the assumed KNPP waste volume, this shipment weight translates into a total of 167 shipments per year. With a vehicular speed of 20 miles per hour, the resultant total population exposure time is 375 person-hours per year. At the concentration limits established for the alternative disposal, the potential onlooker doses during transport will be less than 0.01 person-rem.per year. For the modeling of the exposure to the transport worker, the IMPACTS-BRC model assumes two drivers per vehicle.

As presented in the September 12, 1989 submittal, the maximum dose to the driver is less than I mrem per year (<0.001 rem/yr). Therefore, the total collective dose to the transport workers will be twice the individual dose, i.e.,

less than 0.002 person-rem. Including the population dose of <0.01 person-rem per year, the total collective dose to both the transport workers and the population is less than 0.02 person-rem (0.002 person-rem + 0.01 person-rem

< 0.02 person-rem).

For the disposal of the existing 15,000 ft3 of contaminated sludges, the population dose due to the transportation of the waste is calculated to be 0.0002 person-remn. The estimated collective exposure to the transport worker is 0.00007 person-rem. The total collective dose due to transport of the waste is 0.00027 person-rem.

E-10 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 6 Additional Potential Disposal Method The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has requested Wisconsin Public Service to examine the feasibility of land application of the lagoon sludges in lieu of disposal in the Kewaunee County Landfill. Land application is also an option for the disposal of the sewage sludges. Therefore, WPS requests that the option for onsite disposal at the KNPP site by land application be included in the alternative disposal methods which was determined to be acceptable in our September 12, 1989 submittal.

The potential pathways of exposure as evaluated in the September 12, 1989 submittal conservatively bound any additional pathways of exposure that would result from onsite land sprading of the waste. Attachment A to this response provides an overview of the land spreading disposal method. Also, the pathways of exposure applicable to the onsite land application are evaluated; and a comparison to the controlling pathways and radionuclide concentrations as presented in the September 12, 1989 submittal are discussed. From a modeling standpoint, the two exposure scenarios, "Radiation Exposure During Transport" and "Radiation Exposure to Landfill Operator," appropriately characterize any potential exposure to workers involved with the land spreading of th6 waste. The other post-disposal exposure scenarios, "Intruder Scenario", "Intruder Well", and "Exposed Waste Scenario," as described in NUREG/CR-3585 (and as discussed in Appendix C of the submittal) reasonably bound any potential exposures from either ground waste migration or post-release from the Kewaunee site. In no case is there a higher potential for exposure from land application than the pathways and potential exposures that were used for the derivation of the limits for alternative disposal.

Therefore, no revisions are needed to the radionuclide concentration limits proposed in the September 12, 1989 submittal to include the option for disposal by onsite land spreading of the waste.

E-11 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 7 Table A Radionuclide Quantity Limits for Alternative Disposal Limiting Limiting Annual Nuclide Concentration Quantity (pCilml) (Ci)

H-3 9.65E-04 0.7382 C-14 4.55E-05 0.0348 Cr-51 3.13E-04 0.2394 Mn-54 1.14E-05 0.0087 Fe-55 1-003E-02 7.6500 Fe-59 7.90E-06 0.0060 Co-58 1. 16E-05 0.0089 Co-60 3.74E-06 0.0029 Ni-63 I .OOE-02 7.6500 Sr-90 3.45E-03 2.6393 Zr-95 6.28E-06 0.0048 Nb-95 1.23E-05 0.0094 Mo-99 6.73E-05 0.0515 Tc-99 2.70E-04 0.2066 1-129 2.50E-06 0.0019

[-131 2.68E-05 .0.0205 Cs- 134 6.16E-06 0.0047 Cs- 137 1.71E-05 0.0131 Ba-140 5.52E-05 0.0422 La- 140 4.17E-06 0.0032 Transuranics

.TRU (TI/, > 5 yrs) 8.91E-05 0.0682 Pu-241 2.85E-03 2.1803 Cm-242 I.OOE-02 7.6500 As.sumes annual quantity of KNPP wastes is 27,000 ft3 or 7.65 E8 mis.

E-12 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 8 Appendix A Evaluation of Onsite Land Application for Alternative Disposal of Very-Low-Level Contaminated Materials Overview Land spreading of lagoon sludges onsite at the Kewaunee.Nuclear Power Plant has been recommended by personnel from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as a desirable alternative to the use of the Kewaunee County Landfill for disposal. This method of disposal is also a recommended practice for disposing of sewage treatment facility sludges.

Therefore, WPS requests that this disposal method be included in the options available for the alternative disposal of very-low-level radioactively contaminated materials from KNPP.

Description of Disposal Method The disposal of KNPP sludges will be performed by beneficial land application to a dedicated disposal area located onsite at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant. Typical methods of land spreading will be employed. KNPP sludges will be loaded onto appropriate vehicles (e.g.,

tanker truck, sludge spreader, etc.) and applied to the dedicated disposal area. The dedicated disposal area will be periodically plowed to a depth of 6 inches.

Onsite disposal of water treatment and sewage sludges are allowed by EPA and State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with the criteria and limits for land spreading being specified by the potential use of the land. The two land use criteria are 1) Agricultural land that covers any lands upon which food crops are grown or animals are grazed for human consumption, and 2) NQn-Agricultural land that covers lands which do not represent ingestion pathways to nian. To be conservative, the Agricultural Land Application limits of sludge contaminants will be applied to the KNPP wastes even though the less restrictive Non-Agricultural Land Application sludge contamination limits are allowed. Therefore, no more than 50 metric tons of sludge per hectare will be applied to the dedicated disposal site. This limit will ensure that any land application will not exceed the bounds of the dose analysis as E-13 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 9 performed previously. In addition, other limitations as applied to land application by the State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources will be followed (e.g., control of runoff/erosion, proximity to wells/residences/surface water, etc.).

Applicable Pathways of Exposure The pathways of exposure applicable for land spreading are not appreciably different from the pathways evaluated for the disposal methods at the Kewaunee County Landfill or the Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District facilities. The major exposure pathways are discussed below:

Direct Exposure to Workers Any potential exposures to workers involved in the removal, transport and land spreading of the sludges are reasonably bound by the evaluation of the exposure to the transport worker in the September 12, 1989 submittal. The transport worker has been assumed to be exposed for 460 hours0.00532 days 0.128 hours 7.60582e-4 weeks 1.7503e-4 months per year at one (1) meter from unshielded waste. For the land spreading of these wastes, it is estimated that the total exposure time for the removal and disposal of the lagoon sludges will require no longer than a three week period per year (i.e.,

120 hours0.00139 days 0.0333 hours 1.984127e-4 weeks 4.566e-5 months ).

The potential exposure to a worker onsite after land spreading, has been estimated at no more that 100 hours0.00116 days 0.0278 hours 1.653439e-4 weeks 3.805e-5 months per year. Such an individual would be involved in land maintenance activities, such as plowing and mowing. As modeled in the September 12, 1989 submittal, an exposure of 2000 hours0.0231 days 0.556 hours 0.00331 weeks 7.61e-4 months per year to the landfill operator has been assumed. For this exposure, the KNPP materials are mixed with other landfill waste: a 1: 13 mixing of KNPP materials to other waste is assumed. This mixing is not significantly different from the type of mixing thai will occur in.the field with the sludges being E-14 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page 10 plowed into the soil to a depth of six (6) inches. With a land spreading of 50 metric tons per hectare per year, a mixing ratio of 1:30 will be achieved.

Therefore, the resultant dose to the exposed worker would be less than the I mrem per year dose to the transport worker as evaluated in the September 12, 1989 submittal.

Post Disposal Exposure - [ntruder Scenario The IMPACTS-BRC model, as applied to the disposal of the KNPP waste, assumes a loss of institutional controls 10 years after closure of the site (See Appendix B of the September 12, 1989 submittal). An individual is assumed to reside in a house built on 'the disposal area. This individual receives a direct exposure (from the uncovered waste), an inhalation exposure (from resuspension), and an ingestion exposure (from growing LA of his food crops). For modeling purposes, it is assumed that the waste is mixed at a ratio of 1: 13 with other soils during the resident's construction process.

The onsite land application of KNPP waste will be limited by the Agricultural Land Application sludge concentrations even though the less restrictive Non-Agricultural Land Application sludge concentrations are applicable since a "dedicated land disposal" sitc will be used (i.c., no crops will bc grown on the disposal site).

Therefore, provided the KNPP waste does not exceed the Non-Agricultural maximum sludge concentrations for heavy metal or organic chemicals, unlimited application of waste to the dedicated land disposal site is allowed. How*ever, to be conservative, the land application of KNPP wastes will be limited to 5 metric tons per hectare per year.

The intruder scenario as evaluated in the September 12, 1989 submittal conservatively bounds this exposure pathway for the on-site land spreading.

E-15 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Document Control Desk October 17, 1991 , Page I L Post Disposal - Intruder Well The intruder well pathway for onsite land disposal is essentially the same as the intruder well pathway as evaluated by the IMPACTS-BRC model. It is conservatively assumed that the well is located at the edge of the disposal site. As modeled, locating the well at the disposal site edge in "downstream flow" direction maximizes the calculated hypothetical dose. (Additional discussion of this modeling is presented in NUREG/CR-3585, Volume 2).

The potential dose for the intruder well scenario for the land spreading disposal would be less than 0.001 mrem per year. The modeling as presented in the September 12, 1989 submittal reasonably bounds any hypothetical well water exposure pathway.

In summary, the modeling of the exposure scenarios, as presented in the September 12, 1989 submittal, conservatively bounds the hypothetically exposures for the on-site land spreading. In no case is it likely that any individual, either on-site or off-site, will receive a dose in excess of 1 mrem per year from the disposal of the slightly contaminaled materials.

E-16 REV. 10 12/14/2006

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

WASHINGTON 0 C 2?6M June 17, 1992 Docket No. 50-305 Mr. C. A. Schrock Manager - Nuclear Engineering Wisconsin Public Service Corporation P. 0. Box 19002 GreenBay, Wisconsin 54037-9002

Dear Mr. Schrock:

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED DISPOSAL OF LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE SLUDGE ONSITE AT THE KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO. M75047)

By letters dated September 12, 1989. and October 17, 1991, you submitted a request pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 for the disposal of waste sludge onsite at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant. We have completed our review of the request and find your procedures, including documented commitments, to be acceptable.

This approval is granted provided that the enclosed safety evaluation is permanently incorporated into your Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM) as an Appendix, and that future modifications of these commitments are reported to the NRC.

Issuance of this safety evaluation completes all effort on TAC No. M75047.

Sincerely, Allen G. Hansen, Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects IIl/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosure:

See next page RNC LETTER DISTRIBUTION T A Hanson (MG&E) I P Ojieser D2 C A Schrock D2 J D Loock (OPL) M L Mauchi KNP C R Stinhudt D2 Larry Nit2l.en (ANFC) D L ML.arik KNP T J Webb KNP

L Belant (NSRAC) R P Pulec D2 (2) S F Wouiak D2 D ..A Bloin G6 D I Ristau D2 QA Viult KNP K II Evers KNP A J Ruege D2 E-17 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant cc:

David Baker. Esquire Fcley atid Lardner P.O. Box 2;93 Orlando. Flurida 32028 Glen Kunosh, Chairman Town of Carlton Route 1 Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54215 Mr. Harold Reckelberg, Chairman Kewaunee County Board Kewaunee County Courthouse Kewaunee. Wisconsin 54216 Chairman Public Service Commission of Wisconsin Hill Farms State Office Building Madison, Wisconsin 53702 Attorney General 114 East, State Capitol Madison, Wisconsin 53702 U.S. Nuc1par RIgulatory Commisslon Resident Inspectors Office Route 01, Box 999 Kewaý!ne, Wisconsin 54216 Regional Administrator - Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comnission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Mr. Robert S. Cullen Chief Engineer Wisconsin Public Service Comiission P.O. Box 7854 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 E-18 REV. 10 12/14/2006

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGi1O'N. D.C XM 4~

S*gI.ETA& U ELIt...i4E Of I[ or NUC, FALTOR REGULATIOII PFLAT!NG TO (5JJ.E DISPOSAL OF LOEWLEVEL RADIOACTIVELY tNTAMMINATCD AS1E SLUDGE AT TPF KEWAUNEE JJVQLEAR POWER PLANT WISCONSil4 PUBLIC. ERVICE CORPORATION WISCOnSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY hAIJ SDN GAS AND EtLEC IC COMPANY DOCKET NO, 5*0Q-_

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In reference 1, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (VPSC) requested approval pursuant to Section 20.302 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for the disposal of licensed material not previously considered in the Kewaunee Final Environmental Statement (FES) dated December 1972. Additional related material from the licensee, from the State of Wisconsin, and from the staff are conta!ned 4n references 2 through 5.

The WFSC request cantalns a detailed description of the licensed material (i.e., contam'irated sludge) subject to this 10 CFR 20.3C? request, based on radioactivity absorbed frnm liquid discharges of licensed material. The IS,COO cub!c feet of c~rntaminated sludge identified in the request contains a total radionuclide inventory of 0.17 mCi of Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60.

In its submittal, the licensee addres;ed specific information requested in accordance with 10 CFR Z0.302{a), provided a detailed description of the licensed material, thoroughly analyzud and evaluated the information pertinent to the effects on the environment nf the proposed disposal of licensed naterial, and cu.*itted to follow specific procedures to minimize the risk of unexpected exposures.

2.0 DESCRIPIION OQFj143!E During the normal operation of Kewaunee, the potential exists for in-plant process streams which are not normally radioactive to become contaminated with very low levels of radioactive materials. These waste streams are norully separated from the radioactive streams. However, due mainly to infrequent, minor svwtem leaks, and anticipated operational occurrences, the potential exists for these systems to become slightly contaminated. At Kewaunee, the steundary syStAM domireralizor resins, the service water pre-treatment system sludges, the make-up water system resins, and the sewage treatment plant sludges are waste streams that have the potential to become contarinated at very 1cw levels.

E-19 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-2 -

During the yearly testing of a batch of pre-treatment sludge, it was found that approximately 15,000 cubic feet of sludge had been contaminated with Cs-337 and Co-60.

3.0 PROPOSFO DISPOSAI MEI1hOD WPSC plans to dispose of the 15.OCO cubic feet of contaminated sludge onsite pursuant to 10 CFR 20.3CZ. The sludge Is currently contained In an onsite lagoon at the IKNPP sewage treatment facility. The disposal of the sludge wil" be by land application to an area located onsite at KNPP, as shown in Figure 1. rhe area will be periodically plowed to a depth of 6 inches.

Table I lists the principal nuclides identified In the sludge. The activity is based on measurements made in 1989. The radionuclide half-lives, which are dominated by 30-year Cs-137, meet the staff's 10 CFR 20.302 guidelines (reference 6), which apply to radlonuclides with half-lives less than 35 years.

Nucld Total Activity (WI) r.o-60 0.076 Cý 1-7 0.094 0.170 4.0 RADIOLOGICAL iMPACTS The licensee has evaluated the following potential exposure pathways to members of the general public from the radionuclides in the sludge: (1) external exposure caused by groundshine from the disposal site; (2) internal exposure from inhalation of re-suspended radionuclides: and (3) internal exposure from ingesting ground water. The staff has reviewed the licensee's calculational methods and assumptions and finds that they are consistent with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109, *Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix T." Revision 1, Ortoher 1977. The staff finds the assessment methotdolcgy acceptadrl.

Table 2 lists the d~e~s calculated by the licensee for the maximally exposed

-iember of the public based on a total activity of 0.170 mnCi disposed of in the current yedr, as well as the cumulative impact of similar disposals during subsequent years. For any repetitive disposals, the licensee must reapply to the NRC when a particular disposal would exceed the following boundary conditions: (1) the annual disposal must be less than a total activity of 0.2 mCi; (2) the whole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual must be less than 0.1 mremlyear; and (3) the disposal must be at the same site as described in Figure 1.

E-20 REV. 10 12/14/2006

1AM-L2 ihole Body Dose Recalvod by Maximally Exposed Individual Pathway (mrem/yearl Groundshi ne 0.034 Inhalat ion 0.008 Groundwater Ingest ;on 0.007 TOTAL 0 .049 As shown in Table 2. the annual dose is expected to be on the order of 0.1 mrem or less. Such a dose is a small fraction of the 300 mrem received annually by members of the general public from sources of natural background radiation.

The guidelines used by the NRC staff fcr onsite disposal of licensed material are presented in Table 3, along with the staff's evaluation of how each guideline has been satisfied.

The licensee's procedures and commitments as documented in the submittal are acceptable. provided that they are permanently Incorporated into the licensee's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) as an Appendix, and that future mooifications be reported to NRC Ir.accordance with the applicable O0CM change protocol.

Based on the above findings, the staff finds the licensee's proposal to dispose of the low level radioactive waste sludge onsite in the manner described in the P-SC letter dated September 12, 1989, to be acceptable. The State of Wisconsin has also approved these procedures (reference 5).

E-21 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-,I 20.302 Guideline for Oslte Oisg9_a] Staff's EtýLaluaJ.*A

1. The radioactive material should 1. Due to the nature of the -d be disposed of in a manner that it disposed material, recycling to the is unlikely that the material would general public is not considered be recycled. likely.

2. Doses to the total body and any 2. This guideline is addressed in body organ of a maximally exposed lable 2.

Individual (a member of the general public or a non-occupationally exposed worker) from the probable pathways of exposure to the disposed material should be less than I mrem/year.

3. Doses to the total body and any 3. Because the material will be body organ of an inadvertent land-spread, the staff considers the intruder-from the probable pathways maximally exposed individual of eAposure should be lens than scenario to also address the S mrem/year. intruder scenario.

4. Doses to the total body and any 4. Even if recycling were to occur body organ of an individual froi! after release from regulatory -. d assumed recycling of the disposed control, the dose to the maximally material at the time the disposal exposed member of the public is not site is released from regulatory expected to exceed I mres/year, control from all likely pathways of based on the exposure scenarios exposure should be less than I irem. considered in this analysis.

-d E-22 REV. 10 12/14/2006

(1) WPSC letter from K. H. Evers to NRC Document Control Desk, September 12, 1989.

(Z) Memorandum from L. J. Cunningham, DREP, to J, N. Hannon, "Request For Additional Information," December 11, 1989.

(3) NFC letter from M. J. Davis to K. H. Evers of WPSC dated February 13, 1990.

(4) WPSC letter from K. H. Evers to NRC Document Control Desk, October 17, 1991.

(5) Letter from L. Sridharon of the State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to M. Vandenbusch of WPSC. dated June 13, 1991.

(6) E. F. Branagan Jr. and F. J. Congel. 'Disposal of Contaminated Radioactive Wastes from Nuclear Power Plants.' presented at the Health Physics Society's midyear Syrposlum, on Health Physics Considerations in Decontamination/Decomrnissloning, Knoxville, TN, February 1986 (CONF-860203).

Principal Contributor: J. Minns Date: ,lune 17, 1992 E-23 REV. 10 12/14/2006

-_4 Figure I Kowaunee Nuclear Power Plant Site Area Map

%.d

._.=

E-24 REV. 10 12/14/2006

K-94-195 9/21/94 UNITED STATES

0r NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION q7t ~ (41 WASHINGTON, O.C. XW6-00M St-ptesmbezL 14, 1994 Mr. C. A. Schrock Manager - Nuclear Engineering Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Post Office Box 19002 Green Bay, VI 54307-9002

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION FOR AN AMENDfENT TO Ai APPROVED 10 CFR 20.30Z APPLICATION FOR THE KEiWAUNEE NUCLEAR PLANT (TAC NO. M89719)

Dear Mr. Schrock:

By letter dated June 23, 1994, as supplemented June 29, 1994, you requested approval to use another onsite area for the disposal of contaminated waste sludge In addition to the location approved by the NRC on June 17, 1992. The staff has completed Its review of your request and finds that your proposal meets the radiological boundary conditions approved in the June 17. 1992, Safety Evaluation, and is therefore acceptable. The staff also finds that your proposal is in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2002 which replaced 20.302 on January 1, 1994.

This approval Is granted provided that the enclosed Safety Evaluation is permanently Incorporated into your Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (00CM) as an Appendix, and that future codifications of these commitments are reported to the NRC.

Sincerely.

Richard J. Laufer, Acting Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects Ill/lV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-305

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation Cc w/enclosure:

see next page T A Hlanwog (M(M~k) C A mwpe X30 M WSdz (WPL) CS Smok XD3P

)d L Usm- MC C R Stbhmu*t D2 LUny Njacu (ANMC D L mb* MC D A BoSom G6 CA steniky EN?"

D E Cola XNP J N MoiUsm DI T J Webb D*P L A Nucha (N3R.AC) S F Wo6iak D2 KH hEve XNP A P Pdw D2 (2)

I P Oaeulr KNP QA VmU KNP C A Sduock V2 E-25 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant cc:

Foley & Lardner Attention: Mr. Bradley 0. Jackson One South Pinckney Street P. 0. Box 1497 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-1497 Chairman Town of Carlton Route 1 Kewaunee. Wisconsin 5416 Mr. Harold Reckelberg. Chairman Kewaunee County Board Kewaunee County Courthouse Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54216 Chairmars Public Service Comuission of Wisconsin Hill Farms State Office Building Madlson, Wisconsin 5370?

Attorney General 114 East, State Capitol Madison, Wisconsin 53702 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Resident Inspectors Office Route 11,Box 999 Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54216 Regional Administrator - Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4531 Mr. Robert S. Cullen Chief Engineer Wisconsin Public Service Commission P. 0. Box 7854 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 E-26 REV. 10 12/14/2006

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 2056C6-l SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE oFFICE Of NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIOE RELATING TO ONSITE DISPOSAL OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED WASTE SLUDGE AT THE KEWAUNEE HUCLEAR POWER PLMAT WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION glISCONSIN POWER AND LICHT ýCoNpAy DOCKET NO. 50-305 1.0 IN 'RODUQTION 8y letter dated June 23, 1914, and as supplemented on June 29, 1994, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (the licensee) requested approval to use another onsite area for the disposal of contaminated waste sludge in addition to the location approved by the HRC on June 17, 1992.

2.0 EVALUATION A Safety Evaluation (SE) dated June 17. 1992, approved the licensee's request pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 for the disposal of 15,000 cubic feet of contaminated waste sludge by land application at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) at a specific onsite location. The SE imposed the following boundary conditions:

I. The annual disposal must be less than a total activity of 0.2 *Ci.

2. The wiole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed Individual must be less than 0.1 mrem/year.

3. The disposal must be the same site.

The site designated in the SE was an unused area adjacent to the onsite lagoon at the KNPP sewage treatment facility. In 1993, approximately 7500 cubic feet of the original 15,000 cubic feet of contaminated sludge was spread on that location. The licensee has now proposed to dispose of the remaining contaminated sludge at another onsite location northwest of the plant (see Attachuent). ThIlicensee has coamitted that the new disposal. loeation will meet all the radiological boundary conditions contained In the SE for the 10 CFR 20.302 application approved en June 17, 1992. Additionally, the licensee has stated that this additional disposal site will meet all applicable Wisconsin Department of Ratural Resources (WDNR) application requirements (i.e., sludge application rate and frequency of spreading rate),

in addition to WlNR landspreading requirements regarding location and performance standards that were required at the original disposal site.

E-27 REV. 10 12/14/2006

3.0 CONCLUSION

/

The staff finods the licensee's proposal to dispose of the low-level radioactive waste sludge in the additional onsite location to be within the radiological boundary conditions approved in the June 17, 1992, SE and Is therefore acceptable. The staff also finds that your proposal Is in accordance with 10 CFR 20.2002 which replaced 20.302 on January 1, 1994.

As stated In the URC's June 17, 1*92, approval of the licensee's 10 CFR 20.302 application, the licensee is required to permanently Incorporate this modification into the Offslte Dose Calculation Manual as an Appendix, and that future modificatlon of this comitment be reported to the NRC:

Principal Contributor: S. Xlementowicz Date: September 14, 1994

Attachment:

IKNPP Site Area Map E-28 REV. 10 12/14/2006

i ( I I I r r i (

t , f al REV. 10 E-29 12/14/2006,

~f'oC..

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINOTON. D.C. 288-M Mr.Lh1. 1tarchi

'Manager - Nuclear Business Group, Visconsin Public Service Corporation Post Office Box 19002 Green Bay, V1 54307-9002

SUBJECT:

ALTERNATE DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED SE*AE TREAT14ENi PLANT SLUDGE IN ACCORMDCE WMITh 10 CFR 20.2002 (TAC NO. M93844)

Dear Hr,

Marchi:

By letter dated October 17, 1995, as supplemented on November 3, 1995, you requested approval for the onuite disposal of contialnated sevage treatment sludge In accordance with 10 CFR 20.2002. This request was siihlar to a previous disposal request that was approved by the NRC on June 17, 1299.

The staff has copleted its review of your request and finds that your proposal meets the radiological boundary conditions approved in the June 17, 1992, Safety Evaluation, ard Is therefore acceptable.

This approval Is granteo provided t"at the enclosed safety evaluation is permanently Incorporated Into you Offstte Dose Calculation Manual (OOCM) as an Appendix, and that future modifications of these coimmtaents are reported to the HRC.

Sincerely, Richard J. Lau or, ProJect Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects 111/1V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-305

Enclosure:

Safety EvaluatioA cc: See next page N2LC-to WPSC Lama 61 sITImuror4 T A Hwano (MO&E) K H Eym XY C SSznokcu KfP 1 W Scitm (WPL) M L M&I= D2 C R S,.nhw* ]D2 Lany NIlus (ANPC) I X Jubin (0SRAC) CA Szerntz XKNP(ic)

DA Bofn G6 R P Puloc XH? (7) Wozmbk D2 D E Day DI C A Schirk KWP BYDonmick K"P (Com)

E-30 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Mr. H. L. Marchi Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant cc:

Foley I Lardner Attention: Mr. Bradley D. Jackson One South Pinckney Street P. 0. Box 1497 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-1497 Chal rman Town of Carlton Route I Kewaunee, Wisconsin S4216 Hr. Harold Reckelberg, Chairiman Kewaunee County Board Kewaunee County Courthouse Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54Z16 Chairman Public Service Comisslon of Wisconsin Hill Farms State Office Building HMdison, t1sconsin 5370Z.

Attorney Genveral 114 East, State Capitol Madison, Wisconsin 53702 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comisston Resident Inspectors Office Route #1, Box 999 Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54216 Regional Administrator - Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4531 Mr. Robert S. Cullen Chief Engineer Wisconsin Public Service Commission P. 0. Box 1854 Madison, Wisconsin 53707 E-31 REV. 10 12/14/2006

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SAFETY EVALUATION. BY. ]ME OFFICE OF NUCLEAR RE-ACTOR EGIJ.AITO RELATING TO OHSIT! DISPOSAL OF LOU-LEVEL RIDTOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED SEWAGE TREATMENT SLLJGE AT THE KEOMAJHEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT -.

WI$C0NSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION WISCONSIN POWER AMD LIGHT COKmma MADISON GM AND ELECTRIC CMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-305 By letter dated October 17, 1995, 0$ supp leiite4 on Novegber 3, 1995, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (tealceisae) requested approval for the onsite disposal of contaminated sewage sludge similar to a previous disposal "

request that was approved by the KRC on Jun. 17. 1992.

2.0 RACKGROUA!

In a letter dated September 12, 1989, the license, requested authorization for the alternate disposal of very-low-level radioactive material. In a Safety Evaluation (SE) dated June 17, 1992, the NIC approved th* licensee's request pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 (new 10 CFR 20.2002) for the disposal of 15,000 cubic feet of contaminated vaste sludge by land application at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) location. The SE imposed the following boundary condi tions:

1. The annual disposal must be less than a total activity of 0.2 xCi.

2. The whole body dose to the hypothetical anximally exposed Individual must be less than 0.1 mreu/yeur.

3. The disposal must be at the same site.

The licensee completed the disposal of the contaminated waste sludge discussed in the SE dated June 17, 192. The licensee is nov requesting authorization to dispose of additional contaminated waste sludge within the boundary conditions of the previously approved disposal.

3.0 EVALUATION The licensee has proposed to dispose of approximately 6000 gallons (800 cubic feet) of sewage sludge similar to the material approved for disposal in the SE dated June 17, 1992. The principal radionuclides identified in the waste sludge and their activity based on measurements inMay 1995 are: Co-58, E-32 REV. 10 12/14/2006

0.0009 UCI; Co-60, 0.0008 mCi; and Cr-5I, 0.0006 mCi. The total combined activity is 0.0023 mCi. This activity Is veil below the boundary value of 0.2 sCi. Additionally. Cr-SI with it short half-life (27.7 day) will have undergone significant decay froa its initial value of 0.0006 Ei.

The licensee has comitted that the new disposal vill meet all the radiological boundary conditions, on a cuaulative basis, contained In the SE for the 10 CFR 20.302 application approved on June 17, 1992. Additionally, the licensee has stated that all applicable permits for this disposal have been obtained from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

4.0 CONCLUSIO The staff finds the licensee's proposal to dispose of the low-level radioactive waste sludge pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002, on the licensee's site (see Attachment), is within the radiological boundary conditions approved In the June 17, 1992, SER and is therefore acceptable.

The licensee is required to permanently incorporate this modification into the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual as an Appendix, and to ensure that future modifications of these coaittents are reported to the NRC.

Principal Contributor: S. Klementowicz Date: Hovernber 13, 1995

Attachment:

KNPP Site Area Map E-33 REV. 10 12/14/2006

4oIt

'U E-34 REV. 10 li !i t. ......... 1. LI I 12/14/2006

i

- ~,* arG(,

C- 1.,~

0 A UNfTED STATES

,?ecNa/.Y-IY-y 7, 0 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

r WASHINTON. O.C. =W&-=O1 April 9, 1997 Mr. M. L. Marchi Manager - Nuclear Business Group Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Post Office Box 19002 Green Bay, WI 54307-9002

SUBJECT:

ONSITE DISPOSAL Of CONTAMINATED SLUDGE PURSUANT 10 10 CFR 20.2002 (TAC NO. M97411)

Dear Mr. Marchl:

By letter dated December 20, 1996. you requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review the applicability of a 10 CFR 20.203 (now 20.2002) application approved on June 17, 1992, for additional disposals of a similar nature.

The staff has completed its review of your request and agrees with your determination that the 10 CFR 20.203 application for onsite disposal of sludge contaminated with licensed radioactive material, which was approved on June 17, 1992, contains bounding conditions that are applicable for additional onsite disposals of a similar nature. A copy of the Safety Evaluation Is enclosed.

Sincerely, Richard J. Lafifer, Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects lllllV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-305

Enclosure:

5Sfety Evaluation cc: See next page T A lHamo (McR&E) K H EV*Mlqp M W Seitz (ML) M L HL-vU D2 C s $ka*rNP HO Curca (SC-) C R &afim D2 78-C KI4P (NSRAC)

D A Bolom 06 R P NbcKNI ()

D F Dy D! S F Woa~k D2 C A ScJrk K"NF BJWEmckWPRRmcb.*ke XKP E-35 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Mr. M. L. Marchi Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant cc:

Foley & Lardner Attention: Mr. Bradley 0. Jackson One South Pinckney Street P. 0. Box 1497 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-1497 Cha irman Town of Carlton Route I Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54216 Vr. Harold Reckelberg, Chairman Kewaunee County Board Kewaunee County Courthouse Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54216 Chairman Wisconsin Public Service Commission 610 N. Whitney Way Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2729 Attorney General 114 East, State Capitol Madison, Wisconsin 53702 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office Route 11.Box 999 Kewaunee, Wisconsin 54Z16 Regional Administrator - Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenvllle Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4531 Mr. Robert S. Cullen Chief Engineer Wisconsin Public Service Conmission 610 N. Whitney Way Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2829 E-36 REV. 10 12/14/2006

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WA8"HING#ON. D.C. MOS-SAUI.EEVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF KXICLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATING TO ONSITE DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED SLUDGE AT THE KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATJON WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY MADISON GAS ANO ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-305 1.0 INTROQUCTION By letter dated Oecember 10, 1996, WIisconsfn Public Service Corporation (the licensee) requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review its determination that HRC approval, pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002, for the onsite disposal of contaminated sludge at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) is not required, provided such disposals are conducted within the limits and bounding conditions approved by the NRC In its June 17, 1992, Safety Evaluation (SE).

2.0 BACKGROUND

In a letter dated September 12, 1989, the licensee requested authorization for the alternate disposal of sludge contaminated with licensed radioactive material. In an SE dated June 17, 1992, the NRC approved the licensee's request pursuant to 10 CFR 20.302 (new 10 CFR 20.2002) for the disposal of 15,000 cubic feet of contaminated waste sludge by land application at the KNPP location. The SE imposed boundary conditions as follows:

1. The annual disposal must be less than a total activity of 0.2 mCi:

2. The whole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual must be less than 0.1 mrem/year; and

3. The disposal must be at the same site.

The SE also stated that for any repetitive disposals, the licensee must reapply to the NRC when a particular disposal would exceed the boundary conditions.

3.0 EVLUAI The licensee has determined that NRC approval for future onsite disposals of sludge contaminated with licensed radioactive material Is not required provided the disposals comply with the limits and conditions of the SE issued on June 17, 1992. The licensee has also developed a sludge sampling and analysis procedure that implements the guidance contained in NRC Information E-37 REV. 10 12/14/2006

Notice 88-2.2. Specifically, the licensee's procedure will require the analysis of sludge samples using a detection system design and operating characteristics that yield a lower limit of detection for Co-58, Co-60O Cs-134, and Cs-137 consistent with measurements of environmental samples. The licensee has provided a site map (attached) that specifies the acceptable onsite disposal areas for the contaminated sludge.

4.0 CONCLUSION

The staff agrees with the licensee's determination that additional onsite disposals of contaminated sludge, which are conducted wit.hin the bounding limits and conditions contained in the June 17, 1992. SE and within the areas specified in the attached site map, do not require specific NRC approval.

The licensee should permanently incorporate this Safety Evaluation Into the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual as an Appendix.

Principal Contributor: S. Klementowtcz Date: April 9, 1997

Attachment:

KNPP Site Map E-38 REV. 10 12/14/2006

t E-39 REV. 10 12/14/2006

REMM / ODCM REVISION DOCUMENTATION FORM This is a change to the (circle one): REMM Current Revision Number: 9 New Revision Number: 10 Initiated by: Richard Adams Date: 10/15/2006 t-Track Items included in this revision: CA 26592, PCR 23369, PCR 14906 Describe Change Describe Reason Table 1.1: Changed the default alarm setpoints for Based upon the linear calibration range of the both R-1 8 and R-I 9 to 5.OOE+05. Ntrv -.-P-'s w"t radiation monitors in accordance with CAP 37265 Wre-,*/eVL 4.A .*q

,* , and DCR 26981.

Added Step 2.1.6 to describe releases of RAM With such leaks, use of the PORVs would through the PORVs when there are primary to constitute a relase that needs to be quantified for secondary leaks. dose consideration.

Added Step 2.1.7 to describe releases of RAM Airbone RAM exists in Containment and the through non-routine openings in Containment or the Auxiliary Building. With breaches in either to Auxiliary Building. non-RCA areas, the potential exists for releases.

Quantifying such releases is necessary. This change allows for such quantification if a release does occur.

Step 2.4.2: Changed reference from "ODCM The ODCM reference does not exist.

Specification 3.6.2" to "REMM Specification 2.2.2".

AW P_ POW rDeGAQ- CIe~t. 11, &2

%%.%~w %rA%4A-%r b w Rtie. A4we &0cqW&Y' A~smtAcT k.o Cavwewt-As ýmovv 4&c ~ ~o ii& DEC 14 2M~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Form NAD-05.13-1 Rev. H Date: OCT 4 2006 Page 6 of 7 INFORMATION USE

REMM / ODCM REVISION DOCUMENTATION FORM Attach Appropriate 50.59 Documentation.

[ 50.59 Applicability Review documentation.

Attach .I

[ additional supporting 50.59 documents, as applicable.

Attach

]50.59 Pre-Screening [] N/A I

5 0 .5 9 S c re en in g I N/A

-

50.59 Evaluation N/A Prepared by: % tIt J.V*sAt

(~ t Date: lol t'*\ IU,- I (Print I Sign)

Reviewed by:

Technical Review: fQ'ke. Per nsd f lq ýDate: 72 *od (Print / Sibn)

Form NAD-05.13-1 Rev. H Date: OCT 4 2006 Page 7 of 7 INFORMATION USE

50.59 APPLICABILITY REVIEW (Is the activity excluded from 50.59 review?)

I. Document/Activity number: ODCM Rev. I I

2. Brief description of proposed activity (what is being changed and why):

Add PORV releases as possible release path for gaseous effluents whenthere is a primary to secondary release.

Does the proposed activity involve or change any of the following documents or processes? Check YES or NO for EACH applicability review 3.

item. Explain in comments if necessary. [Ref. 50.59 Resource Manual, Section 4]

NOTE: If you are unsure ifa document or process may be affected, contact the process'owner.

Yes No Document or Applicable V I Process Regulation Contact/Action a 0 0 Technical Specifications or Operating License IOCFR50.92 Process change per NAD-05.14.

Contact Licensing.

Adentify NRC letter in comments below. Process b 0 0 Activit/change previously approvedby NRC 10CFR50.90 In change.

license amendment or NRC SER Contact Licensing for assistance.

c Activity/change covered by an existng approved IIFR50 Appendix B Identify screening or evaluation in comments below.

___[] IOCFR50.59 review, screening, or evalualon. Process change.

Dominion Quality Assurance Program Description 10CFKo.54(a Contact QA.

(DOM-QA-I ) Refer to NO-AA-! 01.

e 0 0 Emergency Plan IOCFR50.54(q) Contact EP.

Refer to FP-R-EP-02.

f 0 0 Security Plan IOCFR%0.54(p) Contact Security.

Refer to FP-S-SPE-01.

g 0 0 IST Plan I OCFR50.55a(f) Contact IST process owner.

Refer to NAD-01.24.

h 0 0 IS[ Plan I OCFR50.55a(g) Contact 1SI process owner.

Refer to NADs 01.03, 01.05, and 05. 11.

i 0 0 ECCS Acceptance Criteria I OCFR50.46 Contact Licensing.

USAR or any document incorporated by reference -

j 0 0 Check YES only if change is editorial (see I OCFR50.71 Process USAR change per NEP-0s.02.

Attachment A). Contact USAR process owner for assistace.

Commitment - Commitment changes associated k 0 0 with a response to Generic Letters and Bulletins, or I OCFR5O Appendix B Contact Licensing.

if described in the USAR require a pre-screening. Refer to NAD-05.25.

Maintenance activity or new/revised maintenance 1 0 procedure - Check YES only if clearly maintenance 10CFR50.65 Evaluate under Maintenance Rule.

S [ and equipment will be restored to its as-designed Refer to NAD-08.20 and NAD-08.21.

condition within 90 days (see Attachment C).

New/revised administrative or managerial directive/procedure (e.g., NAD, GNP, Fleet m 0 0 Procedure) or a change controlled document to any procedure or other (e.g., plant drawing) which is I OCFR50 Appendix B Process procedureidocuman revision.

clearly editorial/administrative. See Attachments A and B.

4. Conclusion. Check one of the following:

[3 All documents/processes listed above are checked NO. IOCFR50.59 applies to the proposed activity. A 50.59 pre-screening shall be performed.

I] One or more of the documents/processes listed above are checked YES, AND controls all aspects of the proposed activity. IOCFR5O.59 does NOT apply. Process the change under the applicable program/process/procedure.

One or more of the documents/processes listed above are checked YES, however, some portion of the proposed activity isnot controlled by any of the above processes. IOCFR50.59 applies to that portion. A 50.59 pre-screening shall be performed.

5. Comments:

m - editorial change for wrong reference noted in step 2.4.2. However, additional changes were made that are not editorial, therefore a pre-screening is needed.

6. Print name followed by signature. Attach completed form to document/activity/change package.

Prepared (print/sign) by: Richard W.Adams I Date: 10/14/06 Reviewed by:

(print/sign)

P1 .e.

af / Date: d/&-46 Form GNP-04.04.01-1 Rev. J Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 15 of 16 INFORMATION USE

50.59 PRE-SCREENING (Is a 50.59 screening required?)

1. Document/Activity number: ODCM Rev 1

2. Brief description of proposed activity (what is being changed and why):

Add SIG PORV (when there are primary to secondary leaks) and additional release points from CTM1T and Aux. Bldg. as possible release paths for gaseous effluents

3. Does the proposed activity involve or change any of the following documents or processes? Explain in Comments if necessary.

Check YES or NO for EACH Oire-screening item. [Ref. NMC 50.59 Resource Manual, Section 5.11 NOTE: If you are unsure if a document or process may be affected, contact the process owner.

NOTE: An asterisk (*) indicates that the document is incorporated by reference in the USAR or is implicitly considered part of the USAR.

NOTE: Check NO if activity/change is considered editorial, administrative, or maintenance as defined in Attachments A, B, and C. Explain in Comments if necessary.

No v' Document/FProcess Directive/

Yes Procedure a [J Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) NEP-05.02 b El 0 Technical Specifications Bases or Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) NAD-0. 14, NAD-03.25 c 0 0D

Commitments made in response to NRC Generic Letters and Bulletins, and those described in the USAR NAD-05.25 d [] 0]

Environmental Qualifcation (EQ) Plan NAD-01.0g e

Regulatory Guide 1.97 (RG 1.97) Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Plan NAD-05.22 f CO 0

Fire Plan NAD-01.02 9g El 0

Appendix R Design Description NAD-01.02 h [] 0

Fire Protection Program Analysis (FPPA) NAD-Ol.02 i 0

Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) NAD-05.13 j Dl 0

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Manual (REMM) NAD-OS. 13 k El 0

Station Blackout Design Description I fl [

Control Room Habitability Study m El 0 Plant Drawing Changes/Discrepancies NAD-05.01 n CalculationslEvaluations/Analyses/Computer Software. Check YES only if: 1) It affects a method of evaluation Various El 0] described in the USAR, or 2) It independently (Le., not part of a modification) affects the licensing or design basis.

o El 0 Permanent Plant Physical Changes - All require a screening. NAD-04.03 p I] 0 Temporary Plant Physical 90 days at power Changes (TCRs) - Check No only if installed for maintenance AND in effect for less than conditions.

NAD-04.03 q El 0 QA Typing Determinations - Check YES only if reduction in classification, or affects design function as described in USAR.

NAD-01.01 r El 0 Setpoint or Acceptance Criteria - Check YES only if change affects plant monitoring, performance, or operation. Various s [] [ Plant Proceduses/Revisions - Check YES only if the change directly or indirectly involves operating, controlling or NAD-03.0!

configuring an SSC differently than descri"ed or credited in USAR.

t 13 0 Engineering Specifications. Check YES only if a design function or design requirement may be affected. NAD.05.03 u El o Operations Night Orders or Operator Work Arounds - Check YES only if SSCs are operated or configured differently than described in USAR.

NAD-12.08 v Temporary plant alterations (e.g.,jumpers, scaffolding, shielding, barriers). Check YES only if installed (or in effect) NAD-08. 14, El . for maintenance for longer than 90 days at power conditions. GMP-! 27, HP-04.002, FPP-08.09 w El 0 Temporary plant alterations - Check YES only if not associated with maintenance.

x El 0 Corrective/Compensatory Actions - Check YES only if degraded/non-conforming plant condition accepted "as-is" or GNP-I 1.08.03 Hcompensatory action taken.

4. Conclusion. Check one of the following:

El All of the documents or processes listed above are checked NO. A 50.59 screening is NOI required. Process change in accordance with the applicable program/process/procedure.

0] One or more of the documents or processes listed above are checked YES. A 50.59 screening shall be performed.

5. Comments:

This change involves adding the description of a release path for gaseous radioactive material, i.e., through the PORV's, which were previously not included.

6. Print name followed by signature. Either the preparer or review al e 30.59 aueni qualified. Attach completed form to document/activity/change package.

Prepared by: Richard W. Adams./ Date: 12/6/6 (print/sign)lDae: Z'7-_.,

Reviewed by: Mike Bemsdorf Date: IZ/7-- _

(print/sign)

Form GNP-04.04.01-2 Rev. J Date: AUG 3 2006 " Page 16 of 16 INFORMATION USE

IOCFR50.59 SCREENING Page i of 5 DocumenVActivity Nnvmhr-r ODCM Revision I I SCRN# 06-090-00 PART I: Describe the Proposed Activity and Search the KPS USAR (Refer to 50.59 Resource Manual Section 5.3.1) 1.1. Describe the proposed activity, and scope of the activity covered by this screening. Appropriate descriptive materials may be attached.

This revision of the ODCM adds the PORVs as a described release path when there are primary to secondary leaks. It would be inherent that with primary to secondary leaks that if the PORVs were operated that the steam released would contain radioactive material, thus constituting a release. This revision also adds nonroutine breaches in CTMT and the Auxilliary Buidlings as possible release points for which releases may need to be accounted for in the dose calculations.

1.2. Search the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) includingthose documents incorporated by reference. Describe relevant function(s), performance requirements, and methods of evaluation of the affected SSCs, and where this information is described in the USAR. In general, any USAR information potentially affected by the activity should be identified (consider both support functions and indirect afects). It is acceptable to attach and highlight applicable portions of the USAR.

Reviewed USAR Sections 1.3.3, Nuclear and Radiation Controls, 1.3.9, Plant Effluents, 2.8, Environmental Radioactivity Program, 11. 1 Waste Disposal System, and 11.2 RadiationProtection. These sections ofthe USAR in totaldescribe various aspects of the waste disposal systems and controls necessary for release of radioactive material in a gaseous state. The descriptions are very specific to material in a gaseous state (i.e., noble gases), as compared to materials transported in air (e.g.,

particulate matter and iodine vapors.) However, the vapors and particulate are addressed in discussions that the releases need to meet the dose and dose rate criteria set forth in the ODCM. Section 11.1.4 specificallystates "A record is maintained ofthe radioactive MATERIAL contained in all releases." <caps added showing the intent to include all RAM, not just gaseous materials>

1.3. Does the activity involve a change tothe Technical Specifications?

(Changes to the Technical Specifications require a License Amendment request.)

0 Yes ED No Form GNP-04.04.02-1 Rev. F Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 15 of 21 INFORMATION USE

10CFR50.59 SCREENING Page 2 of5 SCRN# 06-090-00 PART II: Determine if the Activity Involves a Desirn Function (Refer to NMC 50.59 Resource Manual Section 5.3.2)

Compare the proposed activity to the relevant portions of the USAR and answer the following questions:

YES NO QUESTION 1 E0 0 Does the proposed activity involve Safety Analyses or an SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses?

2. 0 0 Does the proposed activity involve SSCs that support SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses?

Does the proposed activity involve SSCs whose failure could initiatea transient (e.g., reactor trip, loss of 3 F' feedwater, etc) or accident?

4. c . Does the proposed activity involve SSCs whose failure could impact SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses?

Does the proposed activity involve USAR-described SSCs or procedural controls that perform functions

5. 0 I] that are required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with, regulations, license conditions, orders, or Technical Specifications?

6. 0 0 Does the activity involve a method of evaluation described in the USAR?

7. F' 0 Is the activity a test or experiment? (i.e., a nonpassive activity which gathers data)

8. 0 0 Does the activityexceed or potentiallyaffect a design basis limit for a fission product barrier (DBLFPB)? If this question is answered YES, this activity requires a IOCFR50.59 Evaluation.

Ifthe answer to all of these questions is NO, answer PART III as Not Applicable, and proceed to PART IV. A IOCFR50.59 evaluationis not required.

If any of the above questions are checkedYES, identify the specific design function, method otvaluation, or DBLFPB involved:

See Attachment 1.

Form GNP-04.04.02-1 Rev. F Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 16 of 21 INFORMATION USE

10CFR50.59 SCREENING Page 3 of 5 SCRN# 06-090-00 -

PART III: Determine Whether the Activity Involves Adhverse Effects (Refer to NMC 50.59 Resource Manual Section 5.3.3)

If all the questions in Part II were answered NO, then Part III is:

Q Not Applicable Answer the following questions to determine if the activity has an adverse effect on a design function. AnyYES answer means that a IOCFR50.59 Evaluation is required, except where noted in Question 111.3.

IL 1. Changes to the Facility or Procedures YES NO QUESTION

a. E] 0 Does the activity adversely affect the design function(s) identified in Part II?

b. El 0D Does the activity introduce an accident of a different type than previously described in the USAR? (see RM Section 6.2.5)

c. El 0 Does the activity introduce new type of malfunction directly or indirectly affecting an SSC having a design function identified in Part IH? (See definition in GNP14.04.02, Section 3.0)

d. El 0 Does the activity adverselyaffect the method of performing or controllingthe design function(s) identified in --

Part I1?

If any answer is YES, a I0CFR50.59 Evaluation is required. For each answer given, describe the basis for the conclusion (attach additional discussion, as necessary):

See Attachment 2 M.2. Changes to a Method of Evalu ation If the activity does not involve a method of evaluation, these questions are:

Not Applicable YES NO QUESTION El El Does the activity use a revised or different method of evaluation for performing safety analyses than that described in the USAR?

El El Does the activity use a revised or different method of evaluation for evaluating SSCs credited in safety analyses than that described in the USAR?

If either answer is YES, a IOCFR50.59 Evaluation is required. For each answer given, describe the basis for the conclusion (attach additional discussion, as necessary):

Form GNP-04.04.02-1 Rev. F Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 17 of 21 INFORMATION USE

10CFR50.59 SCREENING Page 4 of 5 SCRN# 06-090-00 I11.3. Tests or Experiments If the activity is not a test or experiment, the questions in l1.3.a and l1I.3.b are:

ED Not Applicable

a. Answer these two questions first:

YES NO QUESTION O] 0 Is the proposed test or experiment bounded by other tests or experiments that are described in the USAR?

El E] Are the SSCs affected by the proposed testor experiment isolated from the facility?

If the answer to both questions isNO, continue to III.3.b. For each answer given, describe the basisfor the conclusion (attach additional discussion, as necessary):

b. Answer these additional questions only for tests or experiments which do not meet the criteria given above. [fthe answer to either question in I1.3.a isYES, then these three questions are:

E0 Not Applicable YES NO QUESTION 0 E0 Does the activityuse or control an SSC in a mannerthat is outside the reference bounds ofthe design bases as described in the USAR?

0 E] Does the activityuse or control an SSC in a manner that is inconsistent with the analyses or descriptions in the USAR?

E-!, El Does the activityplace the facilityin a conditionnot previously evaluated or that could affect the capability of an SSC to perform its intencbd functions?

If any answer in Ili.3.b is YES, a I0CFR50.59 Evaluation is required. For each answer given, describe the basis for the conclusion (attach additional discussion, as necessary):

Form GNP-04.04.02-1 Rev. F Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 18 of 21 INFORMATION USE

10CFR50.59 SCREENING Page 5 ofs5 SCRN# 06-090-00 PART IV: Conclusion (Refer to NMC 50.59 Resource Manual Section 5.3.4)

Check all that apply:

1. A IOCFR50.59 Evaluation is El required, OR ED NOT required

2. A change to the USAR and/or any document incorporated by reference is El required (Process change in accordance with applicable plant program/process/procedure.),

OR 0 NOT required Additional comments:

Print name followedby signature. The preparer and reviewer shall be 50.59 screening or evaluation qualified. The completed screening is part of the document/activity/change package. Provide a copy of 50.59 screening to the 50.59 Process Owner/Progam Coordinator.

Prepared By: Richard W. Adams / Date: 10/21/06 (print/sign)

Reviewed By: / Date:

(print/sign)

Form GNP-04.04.02-1 Rev. F Date: AUG 3 2006 Page 19 of 21 INFORMATION USE

SCRN # 06-090-00 Attachment I

1. Does the proposed activity involve Safety Analyses or an SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses? No. The activity described does not involve any plant equipment, and therefore no SSC(s), nor does it involve any safety analysis. It does involve ensuring all potential releases of airborne radioactive material are accounted for in releases from the plant.

2. Does the proposed activity involve SSCs that support SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses? No. The activity described does not involve any plant equipment, and therefore no SSC(s) that support SSC(s) are involved.

3. Does the proposed activity involve SSCs whose failure could initiate a transient (e.g., reactor trip, loss of feedwater, etc) or accident? No. The activity described does not involve any plant equipment, and therefore no SSC(s) whose failure could initiate a transient or accident are involved.

4. Does the proposed activity involve SSCs whose failure could impact SSC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses? No. The activity described does not involve any plant equipment, and therefore no SSC(s) whose failure could impact S SC(s) credited in the Safety Analyses.

5. Does the proposed activity involve USAR-described SSCs or procedural controls that perform functions that are required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with, regulations, license conditions, orders, or Technical Specifications? Yes. The USAR describes that procedural controls for release of radioactive materials is controlled by the ODCM. This change describes additional routes through which accounting for radioactive material release needs to be accounted for. The change does not change the methods used, just adds to the situations for which the methods are to be applied.

6. Does the activity involve a method of evaluation described in the USAR? No.

The USAR describes that methods used for determining the dose and dose rate to members of the public are described in the ODCM. This is not being changed due to this change. The ODCM will still provide the necessary guidance for determining dose to the public.

7. Is the activity a test or experiment? (i.e., a non-passive activity which gathers data) No. This is not a test or experiment.

8. Does the activity exceed or potentially affect a design basis limit for a fission product barrier (DBLFPB)? No. There are not fission product barriers included in any activities addressed by the ODCM or radioactive material releases. Therefore, not DBLFPB's are exceeded or potentially affected.

Page 1 of I

SCRN # 06-090-00 Attachment 2

1. Does the activity adversely affect the design function(s) identified in Part II?

No. There are no design functions identified in Part II, therefore, this activity does not adversely affect any design function.

2. Does the activity introduce an accident of a different type than previously described in the USAR? No. No accidents are introduced, as this change does not involve changes to the plant or controls for the~plant.

3. Does the activity introduce new type of malfunction directly or indirectly affecting an SSC having a design function identified in Part II? No. No malfunctions directly or indirectly affecting an SSC having a design function are introduced based on the addition of additional scenarios, which the ODCM effluent accountability methods should be applied.

4. Does the activity adversely affect the method of performing or controlling the design function(s) identified in Part II? No. The change does not adversely affect the method used for calculating dose to the public from radiological releases from the plant.

Page 1 of I

Appendix C Kewaunee Power Station 2001-2005 Revised Gas Doses

Table 2.4 Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2001 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Ist Qtr. 1st Qtr. 1st Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

% of Specification 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.O00E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00

% of Specification O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.110E-05 1.1101E-05 O.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 1.480E-04 1.480E-04 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00, Actual Dose (mRads) O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 0.000E+00 0.0

% of Specification 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.OOOE+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (m.Rads) O.OOOE+00 O.O00E+O0 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 0.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.844E-05 1.844E-05 O.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 2.459E-04 2.459E-04 Page C2 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2001 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.024E-05 2.180E-05 1.560E-06 7.7

% of Specification 4.048E-04 4.360E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.OOOE+0 1 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.328E-05 2.626E-05 2.980E-06 12.8

% of Specification 2.328E-04 2.626E-04

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 9.161E-05 9.163E-05 2.230E-08 0.0

% of Specification 1.221E-03 1.222E-03 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.379E-07 1.829E-07 4.500E-08 32.6

% of Specification 2.758E-06 3.658E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.103E-07 5.443E-07 1.340E-07 32.7

% of Specification 4.103E-06 5.443E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 5.632E-04 5.632E-04 4.240E-09 0.0

% of Specification 7.509E-03 7.509E-03 Page C3 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2001 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Annual Annual Annual Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.0001E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.038E-05 2.198E-05 1.605E-06 7.9

% of Specification 2.0388E-04 2.198E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification"(mRads) 2.OOOE+01 2.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.369E-05 2.680E-05 3.114E-06 13.1

% of Specification 1.185E-04 1.340E-04

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 1.500E+01 1.500E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 6.844E-04 6.844E-04 2.654E-08 0.0

% of Specification 4.562E-03 4.563E-03 Liver Page C4of C16

Table 2.4 Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2002 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 1st Qtr. I st Qtr. 1st Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.573E-07 2.304E-07 7.31 OE-08 46.5

% of Specification 3.146E-06 4.608E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 3.909E-07 5.669E-07 1.760E-07 45.0

% of Specification 3.909E-06 5.669E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.420E-05 1.420E-05 2.240E- 10 0.0

% of Specification 1.893E-04 1.893E-04 Difference 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr.

Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.576E-07 3.354E-07 7.780E-08 30.2

% of Specification 5.152E-06 6.708E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.0003E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 7.448E-07 9.698E-07 2.250E-07 30.2

% of Specification 7.448E-06 9.698E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.016E-05 2.016E-05 4.450E-09 0.0

% of Specification 2.688E-04 2.689E-04 Page C5 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2002 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Difference 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr.

Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.000E+00 5.000E+O0 Actual Dose (mRads) 3.552E-06 3.575E-06 2.270E-08 0.6

% of Specification 7.104E-05 7.149E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.0003E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.913E-06 2.980E-06 6.720E-08 2.3

% of Specification 2.913E-05 2.980E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.558E-05 1.558E-05 7.480E-10 0.0

% of Specification 2.077E-04 2.077E-04 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.053E-06 1.080E-06 2.730E-08 2.6

% of Specification 2.106E-05 2.161E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 7.623E-07 7.899E-07 2.760E-08 3.6

% of Specification 7.623E-06 7.899E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (raRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (niRads) 1.004E-08 1.187E-08 1.830E-09 18.2

% of Specification 1.339E-07 1.583E-07 Page C6 of C16

. Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2002 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Annual Annual Annual Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.0001E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 5.020E-06 5.221E-06 2.009E-07 4.0

% of Specification 5.020E-05 5.221E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 2.000E+01 2.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.811E-06 5.307E-06 4.958E-07 10.3

% of Specification 2.406E-05 2.653E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 1.500E+01 1.500E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.995E-05 4.996E-05 7.252E-09 0.0

% of Specification 3.330E-04 3.330E-04 Liver Page C7 of C16

Table 2.4 Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2003 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 1st Qtr. Ist Qtr.. 1st Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.025E-06 1.025E-06 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 2.05.E-05 2.050E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (rnRads) 2.716E-06 2.716E-06 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification ' 2.716E-05 2.716E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.936E-05 1.936E-05 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 2.581E-04 2.581E-04 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 9.057E-06 9.276E-06 2.190E-07 2.4

% of Specification 1.811E-04 1.855E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (raRads) 1.245E-05 1.268E-05 2.270E-07 1.8

%-of Specification 1.245E-04 1.268E-04

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.13 1E-04 2.132E-04 8.070E-08 0.0

% of Specification 2.841E-03 2.842E-03 Page C8 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2003 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.371E-07 1.555E-07 1.840E-08 13.4

% of Specification 2.742E-06 3.11OE-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.O00E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.077E-07 4.626E-07 5.490E-08 13.5

% of Specification 4.077E-06 4.626E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.953E-05 2.953E-05 1.670E-09 0.0

% of Specification 3.937E-04 3.938E-04 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+O0 0.0

% of Specification O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.645E-05 1.645E-05 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 2.193E-04 2.193E-04 Page C9 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2003 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Difference Annual Annual Annual Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.OOOE+01 1.OOOE+0l Actual Dose (mRads) 1.022E-05 1.046E-05 2.374E-07 2.3

% of Specification 1.022E-04 1.046E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 2.OOOE+O0 2.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.557E-05 1.586E-05 2.819E-07 1.8

% of Specification 7.787E-05 7.928E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 1.500E+01 1.500E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.785E-04 2.786E-04 8.237E-08 0.0

% of Specification 1.857E-03 1.857E-03 Liver Page CIO of C16

Table 2.4 Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2004 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 1st Qtr. I st Qtr. I st Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.459E-06 2.471E-06 1.190E-08 0.5

% of Specification 4.918E-05 4.942E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.21 OE-06 1.244E-06 3.445E-08 2.8

% of Specification 1.21 OE-05 1.244E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 5 .025E-05 5.026E-05 1.010E-08 0.0

% of Specification 6.700E-04 6.701E-04 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.0003E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 7.957E-08 1.115E-07 3.190E-08 40.1

% of Specification 1.591E-06 2.229E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.354E-07 3.293E-07 9.390E-08 39.9

% of Specification 2.354E-06 3.293E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.507E-05 1.508E-05 6.240E-09 0.0

% of Specification 2.009E-04 2.010E-04 Page ClI of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2004 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.905E-07 2.289E-07 3.840E-08 20.2

% of Specification 3.8 1OE-06 4.578E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.OOOE+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 5.545E-07 6.655E-07 1.110E-07 20.0

% of Specification 5.545E-06 6.655E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.352E-05 2.352E-05 1.680E-09 0.0

% of Specification 3.136E-04 3.136E-04 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.148E-05 1.174E-05 2.630E-07 2.3

% of Specification 2.296E-04 2.349E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.270E-05 1.348E-05 7.790E-07 6.1

% of Specification 1.270E-04 1.348E-04

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 3.632E-04 3.632E-04 2.820E-09 0.0

% of Specification 4.843E-03 4.843E-03 Page C12 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2004 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Difference Annual Annual Annual Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.421E-05 1.455E-05 3.452E-07 2.4

% of Specification 1.421 E-04 1.455E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 2.OOOE+01 2.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.470E-05 1.572E-05 1.01 8E-06 6.9

% of Specification 7.350E-05 7.859E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 1.500E+01 1.500E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.520E-04 4.521E-04 2.084E-08 0.0

% of Specification 3.014E-03 3.014E-03 Liver Page C13 of C16

Table 2.4 Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2005 Dose From Gaseous Effluents 1st Qtr. lst Qtr. I st Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.218E-07 2.770E-07 5.520E-08 24.9

% of Specification 4.436E-06 5.540E-06

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 6.597E-07 8.247E-07 1.650E-07 25.0

% of Specification 6.597E-06 8.247E-06

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.617E-04 1.617E-04 6.380E-10 0.0

% of Specification 2.156E-03 2.156E-03 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) O.OOOE+00 O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 0.000E+00 0.OOOE+00

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.0003E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 0.000E+00 O.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00 0.0

% of Specification 0.OOOE+00 0.OOOE+00

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.268E-04 1.268E-04 1.720E-08 0.0

% of Specification 1.691E-03 1.691E-03 Page C14 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2005 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Difference 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 3rd Qtr.

Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.OOOE+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 4.890E-06 5.562E-06 6.720E-07 13.7

% of Specification 9.780E-05 1.112E-04

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 3.776E-06 4.115E-06 3.390E-07 9.0

% of Specification 3.776E-05 4.115E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 6.559E-05 6.559E-05 2.290E-09 0.0

% of Specification 8.745E-04 8.746E-04 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. 4th Qtr. Difference Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 5.0003E+00 5.OOOE+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 1.024E-06 1.125E-06 1.01OE-07 9.9

% of Specification 2.048E-05 2.250E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 1.0003E+01 1.0003E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.957E-06 3.256E-06 2.99013-07 10.1

% of Specification 2.957E-05 3.256E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 7.500E+00 7.500E+00 Actual Dose (mRads) 2.849E-04 2.849E-04 9.31 OE-09 0.0

% of Specification 3.799E-03 3.799E-03 Page C15 of C16

Table 2.4 (cont.)

Revised Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 2005 Dose From Gaseous Effluents Difference Annual Annual Annual Original Corrected Additional (increase)

1. Gamma Whole Body Specification (mRads) 1.000E+01 1.000E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 6.136E-06 6.964E-06 8.282E-07 13.5

% of Specification 6.136E-05 6.964E-05

2. Beta-Skin Specification (mRads) 2.000E+01 2.OOOE+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 7.393E-06 8.196E-06 8.030E-07 10.9

% of Specification 3.696E-05 4.098E-05

3. Ingestion Pathway-Organ Specification (mRads) 1.500E+01 1.500E+01 Actual Dose (mRads) 6.391E-04 6.391E-04 2.944E-08 0.0

% of Specification 4.261E-03 4.261E-03 Liver Page C16 of C16

(This page intentionally left blank.)

ML071220274

Text

SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Dear Mr. Schrock:

SUBJECT:

Enclosure:

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. Schrock:

Enclosure:

3.0 CONCLUSION

Attachment:

SUBJECT:

Dear Hr,

Enclosure:

Attachment:

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. Marchl:

Enclosure:

2.0 BACKGROUND

4.0 CONCLUSION

Attachment:

Navigation menu

Search