|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML20161A1912020-06-0505 June 2020
Response to Request for Additional Information: Yankee Atomic Electric Company Temporary Exemption for Annual Physicals Requirement (COVID-19)
ML18347A3282018-12-12012 December 2018
E-Mail from M. Krick/Sses SSES ISFSI (Conversation Held on December 12, 2018)
ML16217A1682016-08-0404 August 2016
NRR E-mail Capture - Opportunity to Review and Comment on an NRC Information Collection (NRC Forms 366, 366A, and 366B, Licensee Event Report)
ML14029A6532014-01-29029 January 2014
2013 Annual Summary of the Green Mountain Power Special Nuclear Committee
ML13335A0022013-11-13013 November 2013
G20130211 - 11/13/13 E-mail from T.Judson to R.Guzman - Supplement #5 to 2.206 Petition Financial Qualifications Fitzpatrick/Vermont Yankee/Pilgrim
ML13205A2512013-07-22022 July 2013
G20130211 - 7/22/13 E-mail from J.Azulay to R.Guzman - Supplemental Information to 2.206 Petition Financial Qualifications Fitzpatrick/Vermont Yankee/Pilgrim
ML12009A0562012-01-0505 January 2012
Response from Matthew Flyntz to Lenny Flank Limited Appearance Statement Stating That the Meeting Is on Jan. 12, 2012 Not Jan. 17 Re Levy
ML1124905252011-08-25025 August 2011
August 25, 2011, E-mail from T. Matthews/Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Northeast Utilities and Nstar Merger Consents
ML1122700272011-08-0101 August 2011
E-mail Draft Third Request for Additional Information for Application for NRC Consent to Indirect License Transfer/Threshold Determination
ML0721502072007-07-30030 July 2007
E-Mail, Dated July 30, 2007, from Joe Bourassa, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, to John Hickman, NRC, Regarding H-3 and Nb-94 as Left Conditions in Soil
ML0716401422007-03-27027 March 2007
Yankee Nuclear Power Station E-Mail Response to Question Concerning Resident Farmer Well,
ML0708607412007-03-22022 March 2007
Yankee E-Mail, Dated 3/22/07, Responding to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Yankee Final Status Survey OOL-01-06
ML0708607402007-03-19019 March 2007
NRC E-Mail, Dated 3/19/07, Requesting Additional Information Regarding Yankee Final Status Survey OOL-01-06
ML0705906582007-02-12012 February 2007
Licensee Response, Dated February 12, 2007, to NRC Comments on Yankee Atomic Electric Company Final Status Survey Reports OOL-04, OOL-17, NOL-2, and SSS-01
ML0705906542007-02-0606 February 2007
NRC Comments, Dated February 6, 2007, on Yankee Atomic Electric Company Final Status Survey Reports OOL-04, OOL-17, NOL-2, and SSS-01
ML0707800332007-01-24024 January 2007
E-mail Transmitting Licensee Response, Dated 1/24/07, to NRC Questions on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08-03 Information
ML0707800322007-01-23023 January 2007
E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08
L-00-002, E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-082007-01-23023 January 2007
E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08
ML0703800252007-01-18018 January 2007
Yankee Response, Dated January 18, 2007, to NRC Questions on Final Status Surveys TBN-01, NOL-01, WST-01, AUX-01, and NSY-12
ML0703204572006-12-27027 December 2006
Licensee Response, Dated 12/27/2006, to NRC Comments on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, OOL-12 and OOL-14
ML0703204542006-12-20020 December 2006
NRC Comments, Dated 12/20/2006, on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, OOL-12 and OOL-14
ML0703204732006-12-12012 December 2006
Licensee Response, Dated 12/12/2006, to NRC Comments on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, NOL-03, NOL-06, OOL-10, OOL-11, and OOL-18
ML0703204602006-12-0707 December 2006
NRC Comments, Dated 12/07/2006, on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, NOL-03, NOL-06, OOL-10, OOL-11, and OOL-18
ML0634104152006-11-0303 November 2006
E-mail Dated November 3, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634104092006-10-0606 October 2006
E-mail Dated October 6, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634104042006-09-0505 September 2006
E-mail Dated September 5, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634103972006-06-14014 June 2006
E-mail Dated June 14, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0613202062006-02-15015 February 2006
E-mail from D. Croulet of Entergy to Various, Regarding Monitoring Well Status - February 15, 2006-0600
ML0603301312005-03-25025 March 2005
E-mail from C. Craig, NMSS, to D. D'Arrigo, Nirs, Subject: Info
ML0606204812004-11-15015 November 2004
E-mail from S. Collins of USNRC to P. Norry of USNRC, Regarding Commissioner Merrifield Periodic 11/15/04
ML0724200992003-11-20020 November 2003
E-Mail from Jon Block, Citizens Awareness Network, to John Hickman, NRC, Forwarding Letter Report Dated November 12, 2003, by Robert Ross, on Yankee Power Station Groundwater
ML0228306822002-09-11011 September 2002
Need Input for Plan Change - 50.54(p) or 50.90
2020-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
John Hickman - Response to March 19 RAIrge_ Fi-a'ge1_
From: "Alice Carson" <acarsonl967@comcast.net>
To: "'Thomas Youngblood"' <THY@ nrc.gov>, "'John Hickman"' <JBH @nrc.gov>
Date: 03/22/2007 4:48:35 PM
Subject:
Response to March 19 RAI Tom and John, Attached is Yankee's response to Tom's question from Monday. If you have further questions or wish to discuss, please give me a call.
Alice Carson 301-916-3995 CC: "'Joe Bourassa" <Bourassa@CYAPCO.com>, "'Gerard P. Van Noordennen"'
<VanNoordennen @CYAPCO.com>, <erickson @yankeerowe.com>, "'Greg Babineau"'
<Babineau @yankeerowe.com>
11,6:5 M-,ý\Gw,ý66060T.-Tff[5--- Pagef ",,I c:\temp\GW}OOO01.TMP P~6j~ 1 Mail Envelope Properties (4602EB91.80A:17 : 51210)
Subject:
Response to March 19 RAI Creation Date 03/22/2007 4:48:01 PM From: "Alice Carson" <acarsonl967@comcast.net>
Created By: acarson1967 @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO4.HQGWDOO1 JBH (John Hickman) nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 THY (Thomas Youngblood) yankeerowe.com Babineau CC ('Greg Babineau')
erickson CC CYAPCO.com VanNoordennen CC ('Gerard P. Van Noordennen')
Bourassa CC ('Joe Bourassa')
Post Office Route OWGWPOO4.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov yankeerowe.com CYAPCO.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 178 03/22/2007 4:48:01 PM Response to RAI dated 3-19.pdf 9963 Mime.822 15714 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard
c-\temp\GW}00001 .TMP,, Page~
Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled
RAI Regarding OOL-01-06 Email Youngblood to Carson dated March 19, 2007 Comment: I have a question about the sample data in survey unit OOL-01-06 that I did not "see" to ask about before. The survey unit has one sample at 2.68 SOF and the sampling was done on a 25-square meter systematic grid. Could you share the SOF data for each of the radionuclides of concern in this survey unit.
I ask because if the activity is predominantly Co-60, which has an area factor = 1.8 for the grid size, then have you exceeded the DCGL-EMC? I see that you used the WRS test for evaluating the entire data set, but did that address all the questions about sample number OOL-01-06-010-F- SD?
Yankee Response:
The table below provides the activity and the fraction of the DCGL for each of the four radionuclides used in the elevated measurement calculation:
Nuclide Activity (pCi/g) DCGL(pCi/g) Fraction of DCGLw Co-60 1.29 1.6 0.80 Cs-137 1.31 3.4 0.38 Sr-90 0.90 0.7 1.28 C-14 0.54 2.2 0.25 Total SOF 1 2.71 The differences in the SOF above and the SOF in the FSS report (2.68) can be attributed to the number of significant figures used in determining the SOF.
The equation used for calculating thef(DCGLEMc) is:
C, +/- C2 Cn DCGLý x (AreaFactor 1) DCGL2 x (AreaFactor2) DCGL, x (AreaFactor,)
Plugging in the values from the table above for the concentration and the 10 mrem/yr DCGLs and using the radionuclide-specific area factors for 25 n'? from LTP Appendix 6Q:
1.29 1.31 0.90 0.54
+ + + =0.57 1.6xl.8 3.4x 3.7 0.7x54 2.2x860 Other radionuclides were identified above the Critical Level but were below the MDA, therefore contributing very little to the overall fraction. As can be seen by the above values, Sr-90 was the predominant radionuclide.