ML070390297

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Preliminary Work Product to Support February 13, 2006 Public Meeting - Rg 1.206 Section CIV.6 - LWA
ML070390297
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/08/2007
From: William Reckley
NRC/NRO/DNRL/NGIF
To:
References
DG-1145, RG-1.206
Download: ML070390297 (1)


Text

Preliminary Work Product to Support February 13, 2007, Pulbic Meeting C.IV.6. Limited Work Authorization and Site Redress Plan C.IV.6.1 Limited Work Authorization Significant changes to the NRC regulations related to limited work authorizations were being considered at the time this regulatory guide was prepared. Additional guidance related to limited work authorizations and their relationship to combined license applications and early site permits will be prepared for a future revision of this guide or another guidance document.

C.IV.6.2 Site Redress Plan l If an applicant for a COL wishes to be able to perform the activities at the site allowed by l 10 CFR 50.10(e) before issuance of the combined license, 10 CFR 52.80(d) requires that a site redress l plan must be included in the application. The site redress plan will achieve an environmentally stable and aesthetically acceptable site suitable for whatever non-nuclear uses may conform with local zoning laws.

The NRC recommends that applicants should model their site redress plans on the Midland site stabilization report that was submitted to the NRC on October 2, 1986. In general, the site redress plan should describe the scope of actions to be taken following the suspension of construction. It should include a description and status of the site and general site stabilization activities currently in progress (i.e., site drainage, excavation, grading, seeding, etc.), as well as a description and status of the major facilities of the site (i.e., power block area, access roads, laydown areas, cooling ponds, transmission corridor, etc.). The site redress plan should also discuss the final condition of each part of the major facilities (i.e., abandonment of buildings, removal of utilities, removal of debris, etc.). In addition, it should provide a justification as to why the activities outlined in the site stabilization report will achieve an environmentally stable and aesthetically acceptable condition.

If work is performed under a limited work authorization and the COL application is subsequently withdrawn by the applicant or denied by the NRC, the COL applicant must redress the site in accordance with the terms of the site redress plan. In addition, the requirements of 10 CFR 52.91(c) afford the COL applicant the ability to redress the site for alternative uses that were not considered at the time the original site redress plan was prepared.