ML063630084
| ML063630084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/27/2006 |
| From: | Schwartz H - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY |
| Ngbea E S | |
| References | |
| 71FR62663 00014, PR-50, PR-72, PR-73, RIN 3150-AG63 | |
| Download: ML063630084 (2) | |
Text
1! SECY - #RIN3150-AG63 Paqe 111 I SECY - #RIN31 50-AG63 Paqe 1 II PR 50, 72 and 73 (71 FR62663)
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
<annandharry@verizon.net>
<SECY@nrc.gov>
Wed, Dec 27, 2006 10:32 PM
- RIN31 50-AG63 DOCKETED USNRC December 28, 2006 (11:48am)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND Ar) IMI Ir ATIMPQd QTAPP Dear Sir;
~'n I live within 35 miles of TMVI in SE Pennsylvania. I have lived in this area most of my life including 1979 when the accident occurred at TMI.I Those time were trying enough in this area.
Now with the current climate being what it is with the terrorist threat and all. I think that we should do everything in our power to avoid an attack of any kind at any nuclear power plant, especially TMI, since I live within such a close proximity to it. If this includes armed guards at the front gates then so be it. I was amazed that they were discontinued after 911 over a period of time. In my mind not to have armed guards is not only irresponsible but downright stupidity.
One can only guess that the reason for not having armed guards is probably to save money somewhere down the line to make the bottom line look better. This is without a doubt pennywise and pound foolish in my mind.
Without a doubt I wholeheartedly endorse the position that there should be armed guards at the entrances of all nuclear power plants. Not to do so just does not make any sense to me at all. If money has to found to do this. Then do it before something much more costly happens.
Harry Schwartz, Ann E. Schwartz Harry A. Schwartz annandharry@verizon.net Tim pI&e,ý&LI-4
I'l c:\\temp\\GW)00002.TMP Paqe 111 I c:\\temp\\GW}00002.TMP Page 1 II Mail Envelope Properties (45933AC2.7F0 : 1: 55280)
Subject:
Creation Date From:
Created By:
- RJN3 150-AG63 Wed, Dec 27, 2006 10:32 PM
<annandharrv@ verizon.net>
annandharrv@ verizon.net Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO 1 SECY (SECY)
Post Office TWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO 1 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE PM Mime. 822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Rep lyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 1281 Date & Time Wednesday, December 27, 2006 10:3 2 2542 None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is. not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled