ML063460475
| ML063460475 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/08/2006 |
| From: | Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Detroit Edison |
| Shared Package | |
| ML062420262 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341/06-302 50-341/06-302 | |
| Download: ML063460475 (6) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE FERMI RETAKE EXAMINATION - AUGUST 2006
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Fei (v\ \ &+ak Date of Examination: c! 16 2i.r)b Examinations Developed by: Facility / NRC (circle one)
Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l .a; C.2.a and b)
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l .d; C.2.e) 0x0
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
-120 4. Corporate notificationletter sent (C.2.d) PU ct,
~901 [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]
-75 6. Integratedexamination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l .I; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C. 1 .I; C.2.i; ES-202)
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204)
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are keyed to the examination date identifiedin the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[I Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examlnatlon I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of $/'(/*6 as of the date of my signature. I agree that Iwill not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and 4
I authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, Iam aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8h</Db. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist FOITTIES-401-6
~~
rfacility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam: 811112006 Exam Level: RO [XI SRO 0 Initial Item Description a 'b C'
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the faality. 4r
- 2. a. NRC WASare referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
Printed Name I Signature D
- a. Author 6/29/06
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) 6/29/06
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 7)17[Ob
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor ,1) .w Note: The faality reviewets initialdsignatureare not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
FS-403 - rW . . Form FS-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: FWM; z Date of Exam: q8lob Exam Level: R O Z S R O -
I Itern Description a p C
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Avo& w
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified IJA hln d A
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NamelSignature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5
If a fq&y r h
. .n n n it s w caution them that the outcome may change if the NRC does not accept all of the facillty licensees recommended changes to the examination answer key.
- 3. Evaluate and Review the Grading
- a. Evaluate the applicants performance on each examination question to identify any indications of a problem with the question or a deficiency in the applicants training program. A table that summarizes the applicants answers on each question, or a computerized item analysis (if the examinations were graded by machine) may be used to identify items with which the applicants had problems.
If it appears that a test question was faulty, determine whether the question should be deleted, the answer key should be changed, andlor the question should be revised before reuse. Then regrade the examinations as necessary.
If it appears that the training program was deficient, determine the need for remedial training and/or a program upgrade.
- b. After evaluating the examinations, review the grading in detail and complete Form ES-403-1, Examination Grading Quality Checklist.
- c. Forward the examination package (i.e., the master examination and answer key, justification for any examination changes, any item analysis that was performed, the applicants examination cover and answer sheets (the graded original and one clean copy), and Form ES-403-1) to the designated facility representative (if applicable) or to the NRCs chief examiner for review in accordance with ES-501.
E. AttachmentslForms Form ES-403-1, Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist ES-403, Page 4 of 5