|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML20161A1912020-06-0505 June 2020
Response to Request for Additional Information: Yankee Atomic Electric Company Temporary Exemption for Annual Physicals Requirement (COVID-19)
ML18347A3282018-12-12012 December 2018
E-Mail from M. Krick/Sses SSES ISFSI (Conversation Held on December 12, 2018)
ML16217A1682016-08-0404 August 2016
NRR E-mail Capture - Opportunity to Review and Comment on an NRC Information Collection (NRC Forms 366, 366A, and 366B, Licensee Event Report)
ML14029A6532014-01-29029 January 2014
2013 Annual Summary of the Green Mountain Power Special Nuclear Committee
ML13335A0022013-11-13013 November 2013
G20130211 - 11/13/13 E-mail from T.Judson to R.Guzman - Supplement #5 to 2.206 Petition Financial Qualifications Fitzpatrick/Vermont Yankee/Pilgrim
ML13205A2512013-07-22022 July 2013
G20130211 - 7/22/13 E-mail from J.Azulay to R.Guzman - Supplemental Information to 2.206 Petition Financial Qualifications Fitzpatrick/Vermont Yankee/Pilgrim
ML12009A0562012-01-0505 January 2012
Response from Matthew Flyntz to Lenny Flank Limited Appearance Statement Stating That the Meeting Is on Jan. 12, 2012 Not Jan. 17 Re Levy
ML1124905252011-08-25025 August 2011
August 25, 2011, E-mail from T. Matthews/Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Northeast Utilities and Nstar Merger Consents
ML1122700272011-08-0101 August 2011
E-mail Draft Third Request for Additional Information for Application for NRC Consent to Indirect License Transfer/Threshold Determination
ML0721502072007-07-30030 July 2007
E-Mail, Dated July 30, 2007, from Joe Bourassa, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, to John Hickman, NRC, Regarding H-3 and Nb-94 as Left Conditions in Soil
ML0716401422007-03-27027 March 2007
Yankee Nuclear Power Station E-Mail Response to Question Concerning Resident Farmer Well,
ML0708607412007-03-22022 March 2007
Yankee E-Mail, Dated 3/22/07, Responding to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Yankee Final Status Survey OOL-01-06
ML0708607402007-03-19019 March 2007
NRC E-Mail, Dated 3/19/07, Requesting Additional Information Regarding Yankee Final Status Survey OOL-01-06
ML0705906582007-02-12012 February 2007
Licensee Response, Dated February 12, 2007, to NRC Comments on Yankee Atomic Electric Company Final Status Survey Reports OOL-04, OOL-17, NOL-2, and SSS-01
ML0705906542007-02-0606 February 2007
NRC Comments, Dated February 6, 2007, on Yankee Atomic Electric Company Final Status Survey Reports OOL-04, OOL-17, NOL-2, and SSS-01
ML0707800332007-01-24024 January 2007
E-mail Transmitting Licensee Response, Dated 1/24/07, to NRC Questions on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08-03 Information
ML0707800322007-01-23023 January 2007
E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08
L-00-002, E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-082007-01-23023 January 2007
E-Mail Transmitting NRC Questions, Dated 1/23/07, on Yankee Final Status Survey Report OOL-08
ML0703800252007-01-18018 January 2007
Yankee Response, Dated January 18, 2007, to NRC Questions on Final Status Surveys TBN-01, NOL-01, WST-01, AUX-01, and NSY-12
ML0703204572006-12-27027 December 2006
Licensee Response, Dated 12/27/2006, to NRC Comments on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, OOL-12 and OOL-14
ML0703204542006-12-20020 December 2006
NRC Comments, Dated 12/20/2006, on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, OOL-12 and OOL-14
ML0703204732006-12-12012 December 2006
Licensee Response, Dated 12/12/2006, to NRC Comments on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, NOL-03, NOL-06, OOL-10, OOL-11, and OOL-18
ML0703204602006-12-0707 December 2006
NRC Comments, Dated 12/07/2006, on Yankee Final Status Survey Reports, NOL-03, NOL-06, OOL-10, OOL-11, and OOL-18
ML0634104152006-11-0303 November 2006
E-mail Dated November 3, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634104092006-10-0606 October 2006
E-mail Dated October 6, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634104042006-09-0505 September 2006
E-mail Dated September 5, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0634103972006-06-14014 June 2006
E-mail Dated June 14, 2006, to Yankee Atomic Electric Company Forwarding Comments on Final Status Survey Reports
ML0613202062006-02-15015 February 2006
E-mail from D. Croulet of Entergy to Various, Regarding Monitoring Well Status - February 15, 2006-0600
ML0603301312005-03-25025 March 2005
E-mail from C. Craig, NMSS, to D. D'Arrigo, Nirs, Subject: Info
ML0606204812004-11-15015 November 2004
E-mail from S. Collins of USNRC to P. Norry of USNRC, Regarding Commissioner Merrifield Periodic 11/15/04
ML0724200992003-11-20020 November 2003
E-Mail from Jon Block, Citizens Awareness Network, to John Hickman, NRC, Forwarding Letter Report Dated November 12, 2003, by Robert Ross, on Yankee Power Station Groundwater
ML0228306822002-09-11011 September 2002
Need Input for Plan Change - 50.54(p) or 50.90
2020-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
I:Jofn HiCKman - Comments on I-SS Page 1 1 From: John Hickman To: Alice Carson Date: 10/06/2006 3:10:56 PM
Subject:
Comments on FSS Alice, Attached are some comments on FSSs and the draft technical report you provided on hot particles.
Please forward to the appropriate people and we would like to discuss around Thursday of next week.
Thanks John
c:\temp\GWJ00001.TMP Page 1 I c:\temp\GWIOOOO1.TMP Paae 1 Mail Envelope Properties (4526AA40.E2B :12: 35218)
Subject:
Comments on FSS Creation Date 10/06/2006 3:10:56 PM From: John Hickman Created By: JBH@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time comcast.net Transferred 10/06/2006 3:11:17 PM acarsonl967 (Alice Carson)
Post Office Delivered Route comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 695 10/06/2006 3:10:56 PM Comments on AUS-02, BRT-02, NOL-04, OMB-06, OOL-05 & draft YA-REPT-00-019-06.wpd 7376 10/06/2006 3:08:42 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification:
Send Notification when Opened Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
lIJohn Hickrmnan C-6menýts on AUS-02, BRT-02, NOL-04, OMB-06, OOL-05 & draft YA-REPT-00-019-06.wpd ....- a--1Ig NRC Comments on YR Final Status Survey Reports A UX-02, BRT-02, NOL-04, OMB-06, OOL-05
& Draft Technical report YA-REPT-O0-018-06
- 1. AUX-02 YR is requested to walk the Health Physics reviewer through the ISOCS data to show how they determined the value for the samples AUX-0202-1 11-F-G used in Table 8 - Original &
Replicate ISOCS scan data.
- 2. BRT-02 BRT-02 has twelve (12) class 1 survey units of reinforced concrete structures. Measurements made & results provided were Table 6 & 7 - direct measurements & summary, SPA-3 scans and Table 8 - ISOCS scan summary.
Where are the results of the SPA-3 surveys for BRT-01-08 (electric duct tray), BRT-01-10, BRT-01-12 and BRT-01-13?
- 3. NOL-04 The NOL-04 survey unit was a soil area when surveyed, and Appendix A covers survey design &
indicates that soil samples, ISOCS assays, and gamma scans would be performed.
Table 2 - the scan investigation level is provided in units of dpm/100-cm 2 . The scans were done with ISOCS at 1-m with a 180-degree open collimation configuration. It would seems that a scan investigation level in units for soil of pCi/g would be appropriate? Appendix A refers to ISOCS measurements investigation level in units of pCi/g.
Table 6 - ISOCS Scan Summary - provides the scan results in "unity". Are the units for "Unity" in terms of sum of fractions or fraction of DCGLEMc?
Section 7.0 - Conclusion - indicates that none of the "direct measurements" exceed DCGLw.
Does this statement refer to the soil sample data or the ISOCS scan survey results. [Why does YR refer to soil sample results as direct measurements?]
- 5. OMB-06 OMB-06-01 is a class I survey unit (structural surface) requiring 100% scans and systematic fixed-point samples.
Table 3 provides a systematic data summary & Table 4 provides biased data. Where is the scan data for this survey unit?
Lqoht ig£ m2ano,1-Comments_*0n AUS-02, B RT02, NOoL-O4.MB-O6,0QL-OS.&flraftYA-REET-OO-O!9-O6.wpd _ e Also, where is the survey data for the class 2 survey unit - OMB-06-02? Appendix A covers survey design & generally discusses the survey results, but not in terms of pass/fail based on radiological units (pCi/g) or DCGLw.
- 6. OOL-15 OOL-15 is a class 3 survey unit (land area). Table 4 provides the results of the systematic soil samples. Attachment A - Figure 2 indicates that gamma scans were done for three (3) areas, but the survey results are not provided in the Section 5.4 - Survey Results.
- 7. YA-REPT-00-018 EstimatedDosesfrom Inhalation,Ingestion and Remote Exposure for Residual Particlesat Yankee Nuclear Power Station Following License Termination.
This report deals with the potential effective dose equivalent from inhalation & ingestion of a discrete particle, and the potential effective dose equivalent for remote exposure from a discrete particle remaining on the soil surface after the final status survey.
YR also indicates that the draft report YA-REPT-00-018-06 supplements the technical report YA-REPT-016-06 dated August 2006. Page 1 of the draft report indicates that YA-REPT-016-06 deals with potential skin doses from a particle in contact with the skin.
Actually, the August 2006 report provided the (potential) effective dose equivalent for a discrete particle located on the skin. YR has not provided the estimated dose or dose equivalent to skin from a 1.7 /ICi discrete particle located on the skin surface.