ML062680268
| ML062680268 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 08/18/2005 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Berson B, Michael Kunowski, Louden P NRC/RGN-III |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2006-0113, RIII-2005-A-0062 | |
| Download: ML062680268 (2) | |
Text
.~--i-iuu
~riI t
ceacl)Page i
T i4,
From:
Allegations Allegations Region III To:
Berson, Bruce; Kunowskl, Michael; Louden, Patrick
,Date:
Thu, Aug 18, 2005 10:10 AM
Subject:
Re: RIII-2005-A-0062 (Point Beach)
- Bruce, The Cl called me today (8/18/05). DOL's letter did not have any explanation of why they did not accept.
The CI informed me that he received (this month) a letter dated 7/7/05 from L4MC reversing the Cl's site access denial.. However, the Cl is still concerned that he lost approximat Interim.
The CI did not write the condition report, nnfirnv tn renort anvthino that ones wromn Cl renorted the dronoed wri Paul
>>> Allegations Allegations Region III 07/22105 11:51 AM 3>
At the July 18. 2005 ARB it was agreed that EICS (pelke) and technical staff (Kunowski) will call the Cl to obtain the Information due July 21, 2005. Mike and I tried to call the Cl and the CI was not home. The CI subsequently called me on 7/22/05. We were to ascertain from the CI whether the Cl felt access was denied because they raised a safety issue* (NRC jurisdiction), or whether access was denied for an Insignificant mistake (DOL Issue).
The Cl stated that DOL did not accept the Cl's concern.
The Cl stated that it is the policy to report any Issue they identify at the plant.
The access denial letter from the licensee stated that access was denied because the Cl failed to secure a tool with a lanyard causing a potential significant safety event.
Intormation in this record was deleted in accordance Vwith the edom of IntorrntloOt
.Ac, ex~emk+o.
+
__toeachl.,
ag CC:
Heller, James