ML062550226
| ML062550226 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/2003 |
| From: | Dan Orr NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Teator J NRC/OI |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062550226 (1) | |
Text
From:
Daniel Orr I To:
Jeffrey Teator Date:
12/23/03 9:53AM 1
Subject:
Re: Salem valves Issue-Absolutely agree, but if you need me to help out on this one, it will need to be after January 1. Thanks.
Dan
>>> Jeffrey Teator.12/23/03 09:49AM >>
Dan, i agree it is not a current technical/outstanding/safety issue - but it may be a potential wrongdoing issue. It may need further review by the tech staff to determine that. If that review shows indications of potential wrongdoing - it needs to be brought to an ARB. Jeff
>>> Daniel Orr 12123103 09:46AM >>
From my research of PSEG's work managment documents, I suspected this was the issue and agree that it Is not an issue today, it has been resolved. I do not believe we need any followup at this time.
Dan
>>> Jeffrey~ea-tor 12/23/03 09:21AM >>>
[
spoke to atgam today. he Is not working until Christmas - night shift (7pm-7am). he is also working nig1ht shift oni212/6. He Is available to talk by phone or in person on those dates, o.r as an alternative he is scheduled for.."admin" In the plant on 12129 and 12/30 - day shift.
To address the potential immediaby of the techincal issue - I asked him a few follow up questions and was told that:
- 1. the technical issue was resolved approx 2 years ago - when they redesigned the valves
- 2. the valves in questio~n are not. leaking
- 3. it is not a current safety issue of any sort.
His point with the issue was th at when it came up approx 2 years ago they could have handled it better.
I suggest that if you need additional technical Info to determine if the right thing was done - please do so in a private manner with him - ILe. not in public where other plant employees can hear your discussion.
We want future interviewees to feel they can be open with 'us - without their contemporaries or mgmt necessarily knowing what they have told us.
If, after talking tAW-1you get Indications that the right thing was not done - this Issue should be ~
panelled as a potential 55SW. Thanks, Jeff CC:
Scott Barber
.nformatiok in this record was deleted In accordance wit~tte Freedom Of Informa~tion Act, exeMptions