ML062550152

E-Mail from Vito to Salemhcscwe, Review of Transcripts

ML062550152
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	12/16/2003
From:	Vito D NRC Region 1
To:	- No Known Affiliation
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML062550152 (2)

Text

-

Jay: " I .o - l-wd:f Ieview

- " V-.

ot transcripts Page 1 I From: David Vito q-."'

To: SALEMHCSCWE Date: 12/16/03 7:41AM

Subject:

Fwd: Review of transcripts

- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -

- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -

See attached e-mail from Salem/HC SCWE alleger. She has requested that she be permitted to come in on Monday 12/22/03 to review her interview transcripts. I spoke with Ernie Wilson this morning and he indicated that he will accomodate that request (I will not be here next week). Her e-mail also contains some additional detail that should be considered as part of the review of her H&I concern.

Information in this record was deleted inaccordance with he Freedom of Information ft exemptions VC F0IA- ~I S 1 L

" I &0 V-J

From:

To: <DJV@nrc.gov>, <EXN1@nrc.gov>

Date: 12115/03 4:17PM

Subject:

Review of transcripts Dave and Eileen, I'm proposing Monday. Dec. 22 to come to your offices to review my transcripts and answer any additional questions.

Please let me know if this is suitable. I realize it will likely take most of the day.

Thank you, Kymn p.s. PSEG is attempting to have, - .  : removed i as Defendants. My attorney.an l be fighting this motion, especially given "HR" (which was cited in the U =lr taltome.a bein.res osible for my "accelerated departure") reports toAlso, technically, I was an employee of P E t PSEG Nuclear. In addition, my claim of further retalitory action once I wrote 10Mmlys cause to keep him as a Defendant.

p.p.s.. I realize just now that I don't think we ever spoke of the "work" I had planned in early April at Corporate Headquarters. As part of my search for other positions in the PSEG Enterprise, I had offered my services to IT who used to be at Nuclear) t do some work with him and his irect reports. I had had'one meeting already with"" t his office in Newark. Additional meetings with his managers hadb ern scheduled 7-10 days before my departure was "accelerated." Because I was denied access to other company locations'as of 3/28, these meetings had to be cancelled. Any chance of gaining a position or consulting work in the IT organization was lost.