Text

E-Mail to Vito, PSEG
	ML062550053
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	10/28/2003
From:	; - No Known Affiliation
To:	Vito D; NRC Region 1
References
	FOIA/PA-2005-0194
	Download: ML062550053 (5)
	v • d • e

David Vit9 - tKe: P _ Page 1]

'I '

A

.V From:

To: <DJV@nrc.gov>

Date: 10/28/03 9:41AM

Subject:

Re: PSEG Dave, I appreciate your timely response.

I have briefly read the extensive letter and will get back to you with specific comments. Overall, it is on target. There are a few factual matters for me to correct/clarify.

I remain confident in the NRC's attention to concerns I have raised.

Thank you, Kymn In a message dated 10/28/2003 8:42:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, DJV@nrc.gov writes:

Kymn, I received this and your other e-mails from over the weekend. I have provided your comments about the OSHA recordables and the comment in the e-mail about the rollout of the "standdown "meeting to the people who are taking part in the SCWE review.

I have provided appropriate technical staff with the information about the recent Notification written on SORC member training. Please understand that we don't normally'process such items through the NRC Allegation Process, as the resident inspectors are made aware of recently submitted Notifications on a routine basis. It is our expectation that conditions potentially adverse to quality be identified, documented, and processed via an established corrective action program, which appears to be what has been done in this instance. If the individual who provided you the information feels or knows that this matter will not be addressed appropriately within the CAP, we would consider such an assertion as an allegation, and process it accordingly. As indicated in your e-mail, the individual may speak with me or the redidenis, if that have such a concern.

Per your request, an electronic version of our acknowledgment letter which was sent to you via Certified Mail, is attached. This represents our understanding of the concerns you provided. It's rather extensive, so please contact me with any questions.

Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions .. [-_,_"_

FOIA- IC, L4,

ivDav- itQ - Part.001 Page 1 Dave, I appreciate your timely response. I have briefly read the extensive letter and will get back to you with specific comments. Overall, it is on target. There are a few factual matters for me to correct/clarify. I remain confident in the NRC's attention to concerns I have raised.

Thank you, Kymn In a message dated 10/28/2003 8:42:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, DJV@nrc.gov writes: Kymn, I received this and your other e-mails from over the weekend. I have provided your comments about the OSHA recordables and the comment in the e-mail about the rollout of the "standdown "meeting to the people who are taking part in the SCWE review.

I have provided appropriate technical staff with the information about the recent Notificationwritten on SORC member training. Please understand that we don't normally process such items through the NRC Allegation Process, as the resident inspectors are made aware of recently submitted Notifications on a routine basis. It is our expectation that conditions potentially adverse to quality be identified, documented, and processed via an established corrective action program; which appears to be what has been done in this instance. If the individual who provided you the information feels or knows that this matter will not be addressed appropriately within the CAP, we would consider such an assertion as an allegation, and process it accordingly. As indicated in your e-mail, the individual may speak with me or the redidents, if that have such a concern.

Per your request, an electronic version of our acknowledgment letter which was sent to you via Certified Mail, is attached. This represents our Understanding of the concerns you provided. It's rather extensive, so please contact me with any questions.

David Vitq.-.Mime.822 . ..... Page 1 .1 Received: from igate.nrc.gov by nrcgwia.nrc.gov; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:40:40 -0500 Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com (imo-m03.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.6])

by smtp-gateway ESMTPce id h9SEZI6n015578 for <DJV r Tue.28 Oct 2003 09:35:48 -0500 (EST)

'jReceived: from

-byimo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail out v36 r1.1.) id f.a4.3e8364c5 (3866)

From:'.c'IJ ov>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:40:28 -0500 (EST)

From:I Message-lD: <a4.3e8364c5.2ccfd9dc@aol.com>

Date: Tue. 28 Oct 2003 09:40:28 EST

Subject:

Re: PSEG To: DJV@nrc.gov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-------------------1067352028" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5003 1067352028 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave, I appreciate your timely response.

I have briefly read the extensive letter and will get back to you with specific comments. Overall, it is on target. There are a few factual matters for me to correct/clarify.

I remain confident in the NRC's attention to concerns I have raised..

Thank you.

Kymn In a message dated 10/28/2003 8:42:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, DJV@nrc.gov wiites:

Kymn, I received this and your other e-mails from over the weekend. I have provided your comments about the OSHA recordables and the comment in the e-mail about the rollout of the "standdown" meeting to the people who are taking part in the SCWE review.

I have provided appropriate technical staff with the information about the recent Notification written on SORC member training. Please understand that we don't normally process such items through the NRC Allegation Process, as the resident inspectors are made aware of recently submitted Notifications on a routine basis. It is our expectation that conditions potentially adverse to quality be identified, documented, and processed via an established corrective action program, which appears to be what has been done in this instance. If the individual who provided you the information feels or knows that this matter will not be addressed appropriately within the CAP, we would consider such an

L 0avid-Vit0

- Mime.822 'Page2; assertion as an allegation, and process it accordingly. As indicated in your e-mail, the individual may speak with me or the redidents, ifthat have such a concern.

Per your request, an electronic version of our acknowledgment letter which was sent to you via Certified Mail, is attached. This represents our understanding of the concerns you provided. It's rather extensive, so please contact me with any questions.

1067352028 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff

Dave,

<DMV>I appreciate your timely response.<IDIV>

l have briefly read the extensive letter and will get back to you with specific comments. Overall, it is on target. There are a few fac tual matters for me to correct/clarify.

&nbsp:

l remain confident in the NRC's attention to concerns I have raise d.<IDIV>

<lDIV>

Thank you,

Kymn<IDIV>

<lDIV>

<IDIV>

ln a message dated 10/28/2003 8:42:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, DJV@nrc

.gov writes:<IDIV>

<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"5Kymn,

l received this and your other e-mails from over the weekend. I have provided your comments about the 0 SHA recordables and the comment in the e-mail about the rollout of the "stan ddown " meeting to the people who are taking part in the SCWE review.

I have provided appropriate technical staff with the information abo ut the recent Notification written on SORC member training.&nbsp: Please und erstand that we don't normally process such items through the NRC Allegation Process, as the resident inspectors are made aware of recently submitted No tifications on a routine basis. It is our expectation that conditions potentially adverse to quality be identified, documented, and processed via an established corrective action program, which appears to be what has been done in this instance. Ifthe individual whoprovided you the informat

ion feels or knows that this matter will not be addressed appropriately with in the CAP, we would consider such an assertion as an allegation, and proces s it accordingly. As indicated in your e-mail, the individual may spea k with me or the redidents, ifthat have such a concern.

Per y

I David Vitso - Mirne.822 Page 31 our request, an electronic version of our acknowledgment letter which was se nt to you via Certified Mail, is attached. This represents our underst anding of the concerns you provided. It's rather extensive, so p lease contact me with any questions.<IDIV>

</BODY><IHTML>

1067352028--

ML062550053

Text

Subject:

Subject:

Navigation menu

Search