ML062540440

E-Mail from Miller to Blough, Discussion with RI-2003-A-0110 Alleger

ML062540440
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	12/01/2003
From:	Miller H NRC Region 1
To:	Barber S, Blough A, Farrar K, Marc Ferdas, Mel Gray, Brian Holian, Malone G, Meyer G, Neff E, Dan Orr, Teator J, Vito D, Walker T, Wiggins J, Elizabeth Wilson NRC Region 1
References
1-2003-A-0110, FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML062540440 (1)

Text

IDavid Vito - Re: Discussion w/Ri-2003-A-0 1U aileger From: Hubert J. Miller I C .5 To: A. Randolph Blough; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; George Malone; Glenn Meyer; James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Scott Barber; Tracy Walker Date: 12/1/03 12:28AM

Subject:

Re: Discussion w/RI-2003-A-01 10 alieger thanks for the thorough updates

>>> David Vito 11/25/03 03:17PM >>>>

- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -

- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -

I spoke with the alleger here at Region I for about an hour this afternoon. We went over the content of the acknowledgment letter. She made a number of clarifications to the issues stated in Enclosure I to the letter, but I don't think that the clarifications will affect our ongoing efforts. I told her that I would change the Enclosure per our~disc'ussion and e-mail her the changed version.

She asked for the status of our review, and I informed her that I couldn't provide her with an inteririM`

assessment at this time, but assured her that a concerted effort is in progress. She'asked if she could assume, based on the fact that we have not as yet take~n action that affects the operation of the plant, that the NRC has not found a significant problem with the work enviro'nment at Salem/HC yet. I1told her that we were still in an evaluation stage and that she couldn't necessarily assume that at this time.. We then had a discussion on NRC's position on SCWE, and possible actions that could be taken against licensees (I promised her that I would provide her with the publicly available reference information related to NRC's policy with regard to SCWE). At the end of the discussion, I reassured her~that we are continuing to pay close attention to Salem/HG, and that Salem/HG is aware of our increased oversight.

Regarding the review of her transcripts, she did not think (and I agreed with her) that whe would have sufficient time in the remainder of the afternoon to review all of the transcript documentation. She indicated that she would like to set up a day December when she could come in early and have all day to review the transcripts. I told her to call me back when she has a better idea what days she will be available in December.

CC: Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison: Sharon Johnson

.ntormation inthis record Was deleted inaccordance wiht eFreedom FOIA-to &fIfrm