ML062540434

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail from Vito to Blough, Discussion with RI-2003-A-0110 Alleger
ML062540434
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  
Issue date: 11/25/2003
From: Vito D
NRC Region 1
To: Barber S, Blough A, Farrar K, Marc Ferdas, Mel Gray, Brian Holian, Malone G, Meyer G, Miller H, Neff E, Dan Orr, Teator J, Walker T, Wiggins J, Elizabeth Wilson
NRC Region 1
References
1-2003-A-0110, FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML062540434 (1)


Text

Dane1~ldi-1i~csE i66iW/- 2 003-AQ bIer From:

David Vito

\\,

To:

A. Randolph Blough; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; George Malone; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar, Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Scott Barber; Tracy Walker Date:

11/25/03 3:17PM

Subject:

Discussion w/RI-2003-A-0110 alleger

- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -

- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -

I spoke with the alleger here at Region I for about an hour this afternoon. We went over the content of the acknowledgment letter. She made a number of clarfictipps to the issues stated in Enclosure I to'-,he letter, but I don't think that the clarifica ions will affect our ongoing efforts. I told her that I would cha,'ge the Enclosure per our discussion and e-mail her the changed version.

7c-She asked for the status of our review, and I informed her that I couldn't provide her with an interim assessment at this time, but assured her that a concerted effort is in progress. She asked if she could assume, based on the fact that we have not as yet taken action that affects the operation of the plant, that the NRC has not found a significant problem with the work environment at SalemfHC yet. I told her that we were still inan evaluation stage and that she couldn't necessarily assume that at this time. We then had a discussion on NRC's position on SCWE, and possible actions that could be taken against licensees (I promised her that I would provide her with the publicly available reference information related to NRC's policy with regard to SCWE). At the end of the discussion, I reassured her that we are continuing to pay close attention to Salem/HC, and that Salem/HC is aware of our increased oversight.

Regarding the review of her transcripts, she did not think (and I agreed with her) that whe would have sufficient time in the remainder of the afternoon to review all of the transcript documentation. She indicated that she would like to set up a day December when she could come in early and have all day to review the transcripts. I told her to call me back when she has a better idea what days she will be available in December.

CC:

Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson RI ~

Information In this record was deMlt in accordance with the Freedom of Informtioin Act, exemptions.