ML062540277
| ML062540277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 10/06/2003 |
| From: | Wiggins J NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Vito D NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| 1-2003-A-0110, FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062540277 (2) | |
Text
FEE- 'ýViý-,Vit.'Y Re7_Uall from.. Sa. lem/H.C Alleg.er (RI-200-A-01 1 P)
From:
James Wiggins To:
David Vito Date:
10/6/03 3:36PM
Subject:
Re: Call from SalemIHC Alleger (RI-2003-A-0 110)
It's obvious that she intends to shop our acknowledgement letter around to a fairly broad audience so that's an additional incentive to be meticulous in its wording. Let's pay careful attention to the "boilerplate" sections to make sure they don't leave a misimpression - we might want,' to consider wrapping up the boilerplate and putting it in a separate attachment to the Itr and clearly label it in such a way that it's obvious it's a collection of standard paragraphs.
Jim P.S. - My guess is that the Lochbaumn reference may be related to his 2.206 petition on sump clogging. I would think he would have some motivation to guess Salem's position on the "list' of plants.
>>> David Vito 10/06/03 01:49PM >>>>
ALLEGATION INFORMATION - PLEASE TREAT SENSITIVELY - DO NOT DISCLOSE OF FORWARD The alleger just called. She wanted to let me know that she appreciatelthe all f1romn Hub on Fri a. She informed me that all parties had been served (her civil suit), except for'twolvsi~1
~Iapparently, there is more red tape involved in serving the suit out of state).
She asked if I had heard Hub say that we would not be referring the matter to PSEG. I told her that I did.
She then asked if she could k 'now how we are a pproaching the review. I told her that I couldn't give a lot of detail but noted that the review would obviously involve talking to.a number of people. I told her that Eileen Neff and others were making arrangements to begin the review and that I trusted their judgement on how to approach things. I reminded her that the fact that her civil suit is now on the public record will likely cause reaction from the licensee, and arranging discussions with people may become more difficult.
She stated that she understood.
She. asked if I knew that Hope Creek ni.c~pr1ed t~jiweekend (durin rig~versation, I learned that she had heard about the scram fromI JHIIJjI1 ith whom she had spoken). I told her that I was aware of the occurrence. She didn't have, any particular concern about it....just Wanted to know if we were on top of things.
She stated that she also had learned of another issue that she thought our technical guys mught want to keep an eye on. She referred to a NOED, but wasn't sure of the subject. Said it may have something to do with welds....or possibly with something Dave Lochbaum is pursuing with now. I told her I didn't have personal knolwedge of a current NOED working @ Salem or HC related to what she was talking about, but since I don't know everything that's happening at all the plants, it is possible that such a review is in progress. I told her I would ask about it.
I mentioned that our acknowledgment letter would be a bit later than usual because of the amount of review we were doing related to all of the documentation she provided. She indicated that the timing of that letter was not an issue for her. I thanked her for understanding, and reminded her that the letter would give her an opportunity to see how we have articulated her concerns. She asked if we could send the letter to her via e-mail, in addition to hard copy. I told her that we could do that.
CC:
Daniel Holody; Hubert Miller Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions FOIA-S C(9 LkJi
Dý'OlCi Vit(,f-Phairit call from Salem /HC Al!eger (RI-2030-A-01 1.0)
From:
Dav.id Vito To:
A. Randolph Blough; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins: Karl Farrar; Scott Barber; Tracy Walker Date:
10/23/03 3:36PM
Subject:
Phone call from Salem /HC Alieger (RI-2030-A-01 10)
SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION PROTECT ACCORDINGLY Afleger called this afternoon. Informed me that PSEG had requested a 30-day extension to provide their initial response to the court regarding her civil discrimination suit. The extension was granted by Morris County.
She also wanted to know if we had interviewe et, since her attorney has had difficulty contacting him. I told her that I believed we wer making fforts to contact him but I did not know if we were succcessful.
CC:
CC:
Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson