ML062540250
| ML062540250 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 09/05/2003 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 1-2003-A-0110, FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062540250 (2) | |
Text
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20030ll0arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek ARB Date: 9/5/03 Issue discussed: Original Allegation Branch Chief (AOC):-Meyer Acknowledged:
No Confidentiality Granted: No Former Manager, Culture Transformation, indicates there are significant problems with SCWE and licensee senior management focus on plant production over safety. Alleger claims discrimrination, in that, he r.ernpIoment wa's terminated after raising sa.fety conc tothi In addition,iifWLC~'
69111M11111111
-ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair -.Bloucih Branch Chief (AOC) -* Meyer SAC -_ Holody, Harrison 01 Rep. - Teator. Neff RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Lorson, M Gray. Orr. H Miller DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
Contact individual by phone, reiterate the DOL rights, and specifically inform the alleger he/she has 180 days from the date helshe received notice of intended action to file the DOL complaint. Also request any additional documents. alleger may have available to send now for regional review.
Responsible Person:
SAC Closure Documentation:
ECD:
9/5/03 Completed:_____
2)'
0f to open Case (1 -2003- __j.... (reg arding. discrimination). Repanel with 01 following interview of the alleger to determine any other issues for 01 to review.
Responsible Person:
Wilson Closure Documentation:
ECD:
TBD Complee:___
.3) 4)
Conduct a transcribed interview with alleger (by OI,.DRP, SAC) to obtain additional inform'ation on the issues the alleger has presented to us, and obtain. any additional issues-that the. alleger has. Attempt to get details regarding any other events that reflect a condition at the'plant that production takes precedence over safety issues.
0Cj)
Responsible Person: SAC: 01, DRP Closure Documentation:
ECD:
9/24/03 Completed:____
Acknowledgment 16tter -.with DOL rights as courtesy.
Responsible Person:
SAC Closure Documentation:
Review of interview transcript
.20 03 -0 4 5 Responsible Person: -_DRP. 01. SAC Closure Documentation:
ECD:
10/03/03 Completed:___
EXHjBIT ECD:
PAGE01/03YGES Completed:___
/
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
2
- 6)
Repanel after review of transcript interview with alleger to discuss approach to resolution of SOWE issues Responsible Person:
Meyer ECD:
TBD Closure Documentation:
________Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: SCWE, H&l and potential wrongdoing PRIORITY OF 01 -INVESTIGATION: High (H&l)
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is. not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discriminat ion case (DOL case in progress):
.ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wr'ongqdoingq matters (including discrimination issues) that are under Investigation by 01, DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and~regulatory requirement? 50.7 When did the potential violation occur? -3/2003 (Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
'Once date. of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date' to discuss enforcement statute of limitations. issues.
NOTES: (Include' other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential cienefic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, -Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)