ML062210547
| ML062210547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/2004 |
| From: | Wiggins J NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Blough A, Neff E, Vito D, Elizabeth Wilson NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062210547 (1) | |
Text
LGlenn Meyer - Re: allegerconftic3/i 6M8 Pagei1 i From:
James Wiggins I To:
A. Randolph Blough; David Vito; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson Date:
3/9104 10:39AM
Subject:
Re: alleger contact 3/8 @ 6P Since we have it... its "capture-able" under FOIA. Don't know if we can withold It based on ongoing Investigations or allegations, given the way we got it. That would be Karl's call.
oa:
>>> Ernest Wilson 03/09104 09:44AM >>>
- Randy, From 01's perspective, the answer Is "no" to your question of should we be worried. Karl should weigh in legally but my understanding Is that neither the alleger nor Lochbaum were acting as NRC's agent on a mission to acquire the Synergy stuff for the NRC. I don't think Its a problem at all.
Emrie rf
>>> A. Randolph Blough 03/09/04 07:50AM >>>
Thanks.
Re: the USA debrief, I think you could tell her that we have talked to a reliable source who was there.
We will be reviewing the Synergy report onsite, so we will not be dependant on their leaked version. Karl
& 01: Should we be worried about how they got the report, sincxe they've now given It to us?
randy
>>> Eileen Neff 03/08/04 06:47PM >>>
The alleger called and asked what actions have been taken since her Information was reported Friday re USA's briefing. I explained that I had nothing I could add to Randy's conversations with her. She indicated she works on her 3/28 speech daily because it requires regular updates as Issues develop, but there should be no surprises to us. She still intends to give it to us in advance.
,r.
W'dvised that tomorrow D Lockbaum is sending Hub a letter describing his detailed analysis and comparison of the surveys conducted at PSEG (Synergy), Davis Besse, South Texas and Diablo Canyon.
His analysis shows that PSEG is worse than any. Further, Lockbaum has comments regarding the incompleteness of Ferland's response to the 1/28 letter. Tomorrow's letter is a collaboration between Lockbaum and herself, but she indicated the survey analysis is Lockbaum's.
Also, the actual Synergy survey and results are being sent (approx. 100-200 pages, and may have to be sent separately on disk). This letter Is being sent to the NRC only and the alleger pointed out their concern that PSEG would initiate a "witch hunt" If known that the survey/results were leaked. She and Lockbaum want the NRC to have time to prepare for the 3/18 meeting.
The alleger is forwarding additional information from another alleger thegarding te Maintenace issues w
? d about In late January-specifically thatr The reason provided was so ha UPC
(?) I'll provide this to Dave V. tomorrow.
Xt
- q. I L CC:
Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; Karl Farrar diuiazlon in this record was deleted A accordance with the. Freedom Of Informati01 Act exemptions l/
1