ML062210532
| ML062210532 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 04/20/2004 |
| From: | Miller H NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Barber S, Blough A, Farrar K, Marc Ferdas, Mel Gray, Brian Holian, Johnson G, Ray Lorson, Malone G, Meyer G, Neff E, Dan Orr, Passarelli A, Diane Screnci, Neil Sheehan, Teator J, Vito D, Walker T, Wiggins J, Elizabeth Wilson, Ted Wingfield NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194, RI-2003-A-0110 | |
| Download: ML062210532 (1) | |
Text
e:
Phone call to Salem/HC S 1P)
~Jeffrey Teator - Re: Latest Phone call to Salem/HC ~
Paael ~%
From:
Hubert J. Miller To:
A. Randolph Blough; Anne Passarelli; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; Ernest Wilson; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer, James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Neil Sheehan; Raymond Lorson; Scott Barber;,
Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker Date:
Tue, Apr 20, 2004 12:38 AM
Subject:
Re: Latest Phone call to Salem/HC SCWE alleger (RI-2003-A-0110)
I-
'>>> David Vito 04/16/04 10:08AM >>>
The alleger had left a message with Randy yesterday to call her back. She indicated that she had some "non-urgent" information for us. Randy asked me to call her back for him and I did so.
The information she wanted to relay was that she was having a meeting with Commissioner Merrifield next week. I thanked her and mentioned that we were already aware of the the forthcoming meeting based on a Dave Lochbaum contact with 01 yesterday.
She indicated that she was not very happy and I asked why. She said that she had gotten a status of Ol's review of her discrimiantion case yesterday and her interpretation of the information she received was that nothing had been done on her case. I told her that that wasn't necessarily true because a number of the people who need to be interviewed for her discrimination case had already been interviewed in the context of the SCWE issues she raised. I told her that the 01 investigator for her discrimination case (J. Teator) had access to all that has been done thus far in the SCWE area, so he is not starting from scratch. But I did acknowledge that he is in the beginning stages of the investigation, i.e., that the SCWE review is a good bit further along than the discrimination investigation. She said that she felt she had been misled. I told her that I did not think we had ever done anything to mislead-her about the timing of the discrimination investiaationn qnd if she felt that was what we were doina, it was never our intent S
I also spoke with her briefly about comments she had made in an e-mail she sent to Randy a couple of weeks ago about wanting to start a dialog with NRC on the general issue of SCWE. I told her that SCWE has been a matter of discussion within the NRC on several occasions over the past decade, and is currently in another round of discussions. I told her that I could e-mail her some info about what is currently going on and provide her with a contact at HQ. She said she would like the information, tersely thanked me, and ended the conversation.
CC:
Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson Inforinatii In this record wgs in accordance with the Freed o, 11 Act, exemptions-FOLA. -