ML062210518

E-Mail from Wilson to Blough, Latest Phone Call to Salem/Hc SCWE Alleger

ML062210518
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/16/2004
From:	Elizabeth Wilson NRC/OI
To:	Barber S, Blough A, Farrar K, Marc Ferdas, Mel Gray, Brian Holian, Johnson G, Ray Lorson, Malone G, Meyer G, Miller H, Neff E, Dan Orr, Passarelli A, Diane Screnci, Neil Sheehan, Teator J, Vito D, Walker T, Wiggins J, Ted Wingfield NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194, RI-2003-A-0110
Download: ML062210518 (1)

Text

MAR-28-2005 er?: 48 INVESTIGATIONS 610 337 5131 P.02/04 From: Ernest Wilson 0 To; A. Randolph Slough; Anne Passarelli . Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer;, Hubert J. Miller;, James Wiggins; Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray;, Neil Sheehan; Raymond Lorson; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker Date: 4116/04 10:26AM

Subject:

Re: Latest Phone call to Salem/HC SCWE alleger (RI-2003-A-01 10)

Dave V.,

The Info that you provided her is consistent with what I told Lochbaum today and what Jeff T. told alleger two days ago. During my phone call this AM with him, Lochbaum again praised the efforts of the Region and 01.

Eriem

>>> David Vito 04116104 10:08AM >>>

The alleger had left a message with Randy yesterday to call her back. She Indicated that she had some "non-urgent" information for us. Randy asked me to call her back for him and I did so.

The Information she wanted to relay was that she was having a meeting with Commissioner Merrifield next week. I thanked her and mentioned that we Were already aware of the the forthcoming meeting based on a Dave Lochbaum contact with 01 yesterday.

She indicated that she was not very happy and I asked why. She said that she had gotten a status of O1's review of her discrimlantion case yesterday and her Interpretation of the information she received was that nothing had been done on her case. I told her that that wasn't necessarily true because a number of the people who need to be Interviewed for her discrimination case had already been Interviewed in the context of the SCWE Issues she raised. I told her that the 01 Investigator for her discrimination case (J. Teator) had access to all that has been done thus far in the SCWE area, so he is not starting from scratch. But I did acknowledge that he Is in the beginning stages of the investigation, Le., that the SCWE review is a good bit further along than the discrimination Investigation. She said that she felt she had been misted. I told her that I did not think we had ever done anything to mislead her about the timjng of the discrimination Investigation, and if she felt that was what we were doing, it was never our intentt(

)

I also spoke with her briefly about comments she had made in an e-mail she sent to Randy a couple of weeks ago about wanting to start a dialog with NRC on the general issue of SCWF_ I told her that SCWE has been a matter of discussion within the NRC on several occasions over the past decade, and is currently In another round of discussitons. I told her that I could e-mail her some info about what is currently going on and provide her with a contact at HQ. She said she would like the information, tersely thanked me, and ended the conversation.

CC: Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson laforaiUN In WhiS record Was deletd Ift accordance Wit~hj Freedom Of Iniomctkn ftL exemptions ~

FOIA-_14:11_2 ___