|
|---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22207A0312022-07-22022 July 2022
NRC-2022-000092 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed
LR-N22-0016, Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility2022-02-24024 February 2022
Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility
RS-20-140, Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements2020-10-30030 October 2020
Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements
ML19101A4052019-04-10010 April 2019
Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML18334A1232018-11-12012 November 2018
Revision 23 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, List of Current Pages
ML18334A1222018-11-12012 November 2018
Revision 23 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Table of Contents
ML18156A0142018-05-30030 May 2018
30-2018 Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML17097A2102017-04-0707 April 2017
List of Attendees for Annual Assessment Meeting for Salem, Hope Creek
ML16096A0412016-03-30030 March 2016
Attendance List for Salem_Hope Creek Aam March 30, 2016
ML16049A4582016-02-18018 February 2016
FOIA/PA-2016-0261 - Resp 1 - Final, Salem 2011 Annual Environmental Operating Report
ML13364A2832013-12-30030 December 2013
Announcement of 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Administration Dates-Letter Dated Dec 30, 2013
ML13176A3662013-06-21021 June 2013
Audit Proposed Questions
ML13176A3642013-06-21021 June 2013
Audit Proposed Questions
ML13143A3312013-06-0606 June 2013
Operating Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees with Mark 1 and Mark 2 Containments Addresses List - Enclosure 2
ML13059A2972013-02-26026 February 2013
SL-011725, Rev. 0, Salem, Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events, EA-12-049 Overall Integrated Plan Response.
ML13052A7942013-02-21021 February 2013
Complete Set of NRC Questions_2-21-13
ML12334A4512012-11-21021 November 2012
SL-2012-10795, Rev. 0, Sgs Flood Walkdown Report, 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 (Flood) Response.
ML12366A2972012-11-0808 November 2012
Bypass Testing Information
ML12290A1442012-10-0404 October 2012
EN-AA-602-0006, Revision 0, Cultural and Historic Resources
ML12138A0062012-05-15015 May 2012
Aam Attendance Sheet, May 15, 2012
LR-N12-0124, Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-022012-04-27027 April 2012
Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12129A3892012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12129A3902012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachments 1 Through Attachment 8, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012
Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status
ML1113601032011-05-10010 May 2011
2011 Salem/Hope Creek Annual Assessment Meeting Attendance List
ML1211703782011-01-0404 January 2011
Branch Evaluation, Plan & Recommendation, Allegation Number: RIV-2010-A-0202
ML1030004062010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: SAP685996
ML1030004052010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030004072010-10-22022 October 2010
Large Bore Pipe Detail Index List Psbp No. 132419, Aux Feedwater
ML1030003422010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030003412010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, with Handwritten Notes
ML1030003402010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, Draft
ML1030003392010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0 Salem Unit 2
ML1030003382010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Salem NRC Punchlist
ML1030003372010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Configuration Change #80101381 Rev 1
ML1030004092010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Label Request Form, Label 12AF155 S1 Aix
ML1030004022010-09-21021 September 2010
Document PSEG Notification 20462034 Basis AFW Discharge Line Design Pressure
ML1030104972010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: Operation Key Info, Buried Pipe Program Inspection Reports for 12 and 14 Aux Feedwater Lines
ML1030104962010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: 1R20 AF Buried Pipe Insp Results, Notification #20457262, Salem 1- Auxiliary Feedwater
ML1016002752010-06-17017 June 2010
List of Attendees for NRC Public Management No. Nm 10-019; Salem Nuclear Generating Station Discussion of Independent Spent Fuel Storage on 05/27/10
ML1030002042010-05-24024 May 2010
Document: Design Analysis Minor Revision, Subject: Qualification of Safety-Related Buried Commodities for Tornado Missile and Seismic Evaluation
ML1030004032010-05-0505 May 2010
Document: PSEG Notification 2041785
ML1029502392010-04-29029 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1034404482010-04-24024 April 2010
Document: Salem Unit 1 12/14 AF Piping Reroute, #80101382 Rev 2
ML1029804652010-04-23023 April 2010
RM Documentation No. SA-SURV-2010-001, Rev. 1, Risk Assessment of Missed Surveillance - Auxiliary Feedwater Discharge Line Underground Piping Pressure Testing.
ML1034404512010-04-23023 April 2010
Document: Ansys Input Files and Calculation Package Drafts
ML1030002032010-04-22022 April 2010
Document: Stress and Support Summary
ML1029804892010-04-22022 April 2010
Operability Evaluation with Tracked Changes
ML1029802612010-04-21021 April 2010
Notification 000020459689, Submitted by Edley Giles
ML1030002012010-04-20020 April 2010
Document: Ultrasonic Thickness Examination Record, Order #60084266, Procedure #OU-AA-335-004
2022-07-22
[Table view] |
Text
Jamie Benjamin notes/comments on th interview (01-15-04)
The following are my observations/questions of thr"..."terview held on 01-15-04.
E______________________ .. .. . .. . ON.(WHY; WYOXNOT, ETC.)
Will raise concerns and has done so before? YES feels he would raise safety Issues. The reason he would not raise a safety issue Is because he feels it may not do any good.. (I.e. pg7, pg38, 143)
Raises concerns for others? YES Same as above. Individuals feels they would raise concerns however the reason they would not would be because they feels nothing may be done with issues raised.
Believes others raise concerns without hesitation? YES & See Below NO Knows of someone who has experienced retaliation for YES & See Below raising concerns? NO Bins for Issues:
- 1 - PERCEIVED LACK OF FREEDOM TO RAISE SAFETY CONCERNS TO PSEG MANAGEMENT
- 2 - PRODUCTION OVER SAFETY ISSUES
- 3 - SCHEDULE PRESSURE ISSUES
- 4 - LABOR - MANAGEMENT ISSUES
- 5 - INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ISSUES OTHER UNSPECIFIED ISSUES/COMMENTS
- 1 - PERCEIVED LACK OF FREEDOM TO RAISE SAFETY CONCERNS TO PSEG MANAGEMENT 0 NONE
- 2 - PRODUCTION OVER SAFETY ISSUES
- (p. 24) "... he! Chas impressed me so far"
- (p. 25) "... in th years was run It until it breaks and somebody shuts you down ... [with
.. ([if]
it's broken, let's fix It... [I don't thlnkLINNI wanted to be [effective at fixing things.] It's cheaper to run. It' easy to run.
'Hey, IIl explain why it broke later'.. production over all else"
- (p. 101 & 102) A lot of cost pressures to keep the units operating contributes to the shift In safe operating philosophy away from one of "safety first" (p. 103 - 109) 0 w I st took put past the FSAR limits. Engineering given time to evaluate the Issue vice taking action (i.e S/D). ' erpretation of the correct action to take would have been to S/D the unit and search for the cause. Turnd out to be'a condenser leak (p. 113 & 114) Recent decision not reduce power to remove a reactor feed pump from service that had high vibration, as directed in the procedure, exemplifies management's emphasis of production over safety. The decision was made to allow engineering an opportunity to evaluate the condition prior to taking action in accordance with the procedure. (The plant would have had to go down to 95 % power to take the pump out and evaluate/fix It.)
(p. 127) "I've seen in the last year or two a [greater] emphasis on engineering evaluation ... I get the impression that they [managers] are driven In the direction that would maintain the plant running.
- 3 - SCHEDULE PRESSURE ISSUES 0 NONE
- 4 - LABOR - MANAGEMENT ISSUES
- (p. 164 - 168) Some SRO supervisors have expressed that"they need to keep [certain union people] in the union because they [the union guys] are people that do bring up concerns ... because [the supervisors] have to be careful of what they say ... [union members] are not Intimidated ... they [are protected from adverse consequences]." Management people who express concerns are viewed as not being "team players.'
.Information in this ord Wa InlacCOrda fce w., rec S d eetq Act, exI Wth "dc the Fr Page 1of 2 FOIA. emption.. "eedom of Informat,,,o
3amie Benjamin notes/comments on the interview (01-15-04) "-
- 5 - INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ISSUES 0 (p. 8 - 10) The situation with the CO leak in the Hope Creek'B' Diesel room "was handled very poorly ... we dropped one guy. He came out and threw up, fell down. And before the guy got to the hospital, they started running it again ... a couple of weeks later ... ran it again, one of the supervisors [observing the run locally, passed out driving home in his car and originally attributed it to the EDG] ... [then] later on ... [claimed that it] could have been ... working nights ...
blah, blah, blah."
- (p. 10 - 15) After they had two (one potential) industrial safety incidents they required workers to were SCUBA during runs. It was fixed for months. Length of time may have been based on production (72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO not met and S/D action statement)
- (p.15 - 18) Seems to have been many safety meetings, lots of discussion and precautions taking while the leak was active (i.e. scuba and CO monitoring during runs) 0 (p. 19) Did eventually fix It within a 36 hour4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> window (on-line)
OTHER UNSPECIFIED ISSUES/COMMENTS
