ML062150060
| ML062150060 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  (DPR-070, NPF-057) |
| Issue date: | 03/18/2005 |
| From: | Elizabeth Wilson NRC/OI |
| To: | Lisamarie Jarriel NRC/OE |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062150060 (3) | |
Text
,4ffrey.Teat'r -Re: Te LochbaurnRespponse...-
Page 11 From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
- Lisa, Ernest Wilson I KY Jarriel, Lisamarie 3/18/05 2:41PM Re: The Lochbaum Response
.,-li "A.)
in'accordance. *.;
L l
vd'*_",**a,:
i' acco."" "With, te Freedom of in Act, exemptions of
- 2. Information
a-to,`r----R-e-:'T' h-e-C-6...
c-h--b-a-u-m-- R'e'-s'-'p'------'--
e....... -TR-P 2
/
/>> Lisamarie Jarriel 03/18/05 10:48AM >>>
Thanks, I will clarify with Ellis about what goes into the letter, but I'd like to know a little more aboutithfe.,
timing of things to ensure we are prepared for the briefs at the end of the month as well. I know you did"',.,
Tquite a lot to get this issue thoroughly investigated and produce a great report. I think you should be very.,
happy with the efforts and results. I'd like to clearly indicate just how much you did, but I am sensitive to \\
not discussing anything your office thinks is sensitive. I think we are on the same page.
I've heard the NRC discussed with the alleger concentrating our initial efforts on the SCWE concerns raised, which meant a slight (4-month) delay in focusing on the discrimination issue. Can you verify that?
I've heard that while you were investigating the discrimination issue, the alleger brought additional information or clarifications to you a number of times requiring further review. Can you verify that that happened and how often?
I've heard that the case a id-way through the investigation delaying closure. Canypu
\\*.,I'v herd tat he ase gen*d ay trouh te inestgaton dlayng losue.
an*ou.j,'
I psiI II
iJ6ffte 'Teatoir. Re: The Lochbaun Respn
_F P
verify that?
That's it. Thanks Lisa J.
>>> Ernest Wilson 03/18/05 09:49AM >>>
Lisa,,.
2)
/
>>> Scott Barber 03/14/05 11:06AM >>>
Appended is a draft ft. e mlanfor two cases:. t H.
s n case Neither was substantiate We're soliciting feedback on additional Qs and As. We'd like to have a complete list by mid-day on March
- 16. Please provide any comments you may have by then.
CC:
Arrighi, Russell; Holody, Daniel; Montgomery, Cheryl; Teator, Jeffrey