ML062020161
| ML062020161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/2004 |
| From: | Blough A Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| To: | Jarriel J NRC/OE |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062020161 (2) | |
Text
1ý1ý1 tp!
I.$"$ ý' I UQ...
r.~H I ii From:
A. Randolph Blough To:
Lisamarie Jarriel Date:
3/31/04 9:34AM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: Your advice, please.... March 28 speech - - alleger requests us..
yes&yes
(
ct_/
>>Lisamarie Jarrie (03/31/04 08:35AM>>
Once we have made the collective decision that this alleger is a "widely known alleger' on the issue discussed in the statement, I would agree we could make this correspondence publically available on ADAMS if requested. But, unless, I missed that discussion while in Canada this week, I didn't think we had yet reached that conclusion. Last we spoke, we were waiting to see the statement and learn more about the event where it was made. Was the event well attended? Was there media coverage? I'll follow-up with Dave V. and Carl M.
LLJ
>>> Brent Clayton 03/30/04 11:58AM>>>>
I agree with Randy's approach. If the Cl has sent us a copy of the speech and requested that we post it, I'd make it publically available in ADAMS. But I wouldn't post it on the NRC web page unless we had a venue already established (or we decide to establish one later) where this would be pertinent dialogue on the issue(s).
--Brent
>>> John Grobe i 01410:12AM >>>>
- Randy, We had one similar situation and we simply incorporated the alleger's correspondance into ADAMS and made it publically available. Brent Clayton in Region Ill or Lisamarie Jarriel in HQ/OE are your best points of contact. Handle this carefully because this is outside normal allegation practice, but it is permitted and has occurred. I would not recommend putting anything on a web site regarding an allegation.
If I can be any further assitance, please call or e-mail. Thanks.
Jack
>>> A. Randolph Blough 03/30/04 10:01AM >>>>
..to post it on the website.
Jack, we have a Salem/Hope Creek alleger who went public Sunday. she has requested that we 'post' her talk on the NRC website.
We are willing to put it into ADAMS, but would tend not to post it on our website. We might reconsider her request if we ever decide to create an NRC web page for NRC review of Salem/Hope Creek work environment. Then we could include NRC correspondenc and presentation slides, PSEG correspondence and slides, and, I guess maybe, public correspondence.
Have you experienced any analogous situations and what has been your posture? Who in HQ has helped advise?
thanks.
randy
C:\\TEMPýqV)PP9P1..TMP
[j~jWMP\\G1O00O.TMPPane Il Mail Envelope Properties (406AD6F8.204: 9: 34932)
Subject:
Re: Fwd: Your advice, please....March 28 speech - - alleger requests us Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
3/31/04 9:34AM A. Randolph Blough ARB@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFNDO LUJ (Lisamarie Jarriel)
Post Office owf4_po.OWFNDO Files MESSAGE Options Auto Delete:
Expiration Date:
Notify Recipients:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
To Be Delivered:
Status Tracking:
Action Delivered Opened Deleted Date & Time 03/31/04 09:35AM 03/31/04 11:56AMv 03/31/04 02:34PM Delivered 03/31/04 09:35AM Date & Time 03/31/04 09:34AM Route nrc.gov Size 3652 No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate All Information