ML061950580

01/2006 - Public Forms

ML061950580
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	11/02/2005
From:	Gody A Operations Branch IV
To:	Forbes J Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
50-313/06-301 50-313/06-301
Download: ML061950580 (8)

Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES Forms 201-1 and 501-1

=.-

-~-,

CHlEF: 1 Gary Johnston

,-I FACILITY: I? AN01 U1 zd DATE of WRllTEN EXAM: mf3e Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes 10f6/05 I Activity Schedule Agreement (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)

I L

I r

1016105 1016105 NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.4.c; C.2.e)

U t Facility Contact Briefed on Security & Other Reqs (C.2.c)

B 20110105 NfA Corporate Notification Letter (ES-201 AH-3) Sent (C.2.d)

Exam Ref. Material Due (if NRC authored) (C.l.d: C.3.c) -

I NfA Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l.d & e; C.3.d)

I011 7/05 Outlines Review & Feedback from NRC (c.2.h; C.3.e)

/ $

N1A On-Site Audit (10%) of License Apps (ES-202 C.2.e) 1212105 Final Appl. OKed &Waivers Sent to Applicants (C.2.g) 1212105 NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.Z.i;C.3.h) 1212105 Exam Aproval Letter (ES-201 Att-4) and List of Applicants (ES-201-4) Prepared (C.2.i) 2212105 I Proctor Rules ReviewwlFac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k)

~.

12/2/05 Exam Material to Exam Team (C.3.i)

I 12/9/05 Administer Written m m On-Site

) ppy 12121105 Facility Graded Exam & Comments Received 12124105 I NRC Written Exam Grading Completed M D J 11f5105-Examiners Document Exam Grades on ES Forms /lf/&

113106 NRC Chief Examiner Grading Review Completed [ilgj 114106 NRC BC Review Completed 1/9/06 RPSllP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued 1/9/06 1130106 Package Closed Out LicensefDenials Signed & Report Issued 3/9/06 Chief QA of ADAMS

ES-201 Examination Outline Qualitv Checklist Form ES-201-2

'atilt y:

Arkansas Nuclear One Unit One Date of Examination:

121912005 Item Task Descrlption t

1 a. Verify that he outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

W R

I T

T E

N

2.

S I

M

3.

W I

T

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

I c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

c the justifications for deselmed or rejected WA statements are appropriate.

c

~.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarim are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and scenarim will not be repeated over subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outlhe{s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES301-4 and described in Appendix D.

l

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetitlon from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no task are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the (5) The number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

form the form.

4.

n appropriate exam sections.

I a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the 1 b.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate

c.

d.

Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-speclfic prlorlties) are at teast 2.5.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

I Initials a

b

I I

NIA I I -

I I

NIA I I

NIA -

NIA NIA ---

MIA NIA -

NIA NIA -

NIA 1 NIA I ----

Date

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

m 4 ?e S

a.

Author

b.

Facility Reviewer r) lo -I 7- 0s

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

[,p7-65

d.

NRC Supervisor

/od 05 Note:

1. Independent NRC revie ES-201, Page 25 of 27

Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 ES -401 Facility: Arkansas Nuclear y____

One Unit One Date of Exam: #R#OO??

I I

5. Question duplication from the license screening laudit exam was controlled as Indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate

-- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed

-- the audit exam was coMpkkd before the ticense exam was started

-- the examinations were developed independently

-- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication X -- other (explain): No audit exam administered for this retake

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actuat ROISRO-onIy Bank & Modified 191 New (fl L

t Ro @ I RO the RO exam are written at the Initial b*

lea=-

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor ES-407, Page 29 of 33

ES403 Written Examination Grading Form ES403-2 Quality Checklist 4 0 uA;#

DateofExam: 1 )

Q 6 ExamLevel R SRO Facility: 4 f@.

I Y

I Initials

3.

Applicants scores checked for addition errors n

Printed NarnelSign?ure

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

Date 1-12-0 b

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

I -&-as

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

IIBT/ok

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

C 0

a P

m c

0

.- r c

0 a 0

hi P

0 0

c L

O 0

3 cn 8 W

0

% s LL U

U L

0 0 s 5;s

i Q1 Q

0 0

0

[r 0

VI m Y) m 5.;

' 0 3 2 "

LL L LL

m Y 2

N

-L P

I I I I I I I I I I I I