ML061860265
| ML061860265 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/2006 |
| From: | Sachatello R Entergy Corp |
| To: | Rice T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2006-0195 | |
| Download: ML061860265 (4) | |
Text
James No...le-.STATE.SPLI.SAMPLE.C.OR.INAT.ON.Pag 1
I James NaT!ý_- STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Page 11 From:
"Sachatello, Ronald " <rsach90@entergy.com>
To:
"'Timothy Rice"' <tbrice@gw.dec.state.ny.us>
Date:
3/31/06 3:06PM
Subject:
STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Tim:
Thanks for the clarification of the sample preservation protocol. I do not believe we were aware of that specification at the time of the sample collection and mailing process.
Possibly we can figure a way to expedite this, or preserve as necessary, to meet each customers needs. I know that Bill Axelson would be able to best coordinate this. Regretfully I am out next week and will not be able to push this issue up the line, so do not hesitate to e-mail Bill as required.
As a recent update, 10 minutes ago we obtained our first (initial) sample from MW-52, and took 4 additional low volume samples from various well heights in MW-42. We will be counting these in-house at IPEC for tritium and gamma and provide the results to you as soon as we get them. At earliest our results would be late Monday or Tuesday if it get it on the tritium run today (which is not assured).
Please let Bill know your sampling needs and required protocols so he can best make this happen on our end.
Have a nice weekend.
Ron Sachatello From: Timothy Rice [1]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:51 PM To: Sachatello, Ronald
Subject:
RE: FW: STATE SPLIT SAMPLES - Not Received by Lab No I was unaware of the direct delivery. Thank you for that.
Our problem is that we will be outside of our lab protocols for sample preservation at this point.
Tim
>>> "Sachatello, Ronald" <rsach90@entergy.com> 3/31/06 1:52:18 PM >>>
Mr. Rice:
I would assume the warehouse receiving these NRC and State samples at the same time treated them similarly, but I am not in this transportation loop. I know factually that the IPEC samples did not go out any faster than the State or NRC samples.
I do not know if you are aware of it, but three weeks ago Entergy had an employee directly drive the State samples, and hand delivered them directly to the State laboratory supervisor, to try to make this process as fast as possible. We shipped the corresponding NRC samples and IPEC samples using the US mail system.
Janies Noggle - STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Pag e 2 Jl James Noggle - STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Page 2f1 From: Timothy Rice [2]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:00 PM To: Sachatello, Ronald; Scholtens, William Cc: Croulet, Donald; Mayer, Don; Hinrichs, Gary; Lavera, Ron; Axelson, William L; rps02@ health.state.ny.us
Subject:
Re: FW: STATE SPLIT SAMPLES - Not Received by Lab Did the backup for outage receipts and delivery also delay the shipment of the NRC and Entergy samples for the same amount of time?
Tim Rice NYSDEC Env Radiation Specialist II 625 Broadway, 9th floor Albany, NY12233-7255 Phone (518)402-8574 fax, hard copy (518)402-8646
>>> "Sachatello, Ronald" <rsach9O@entergy.com> 3/31/06 12:44:12 PM >>>
Bill:
Can you respond to Mr. Rice and Mr.Snyder on the shipping information as requested below as soon as possible.
I know the warehouse shipping department must be backed up with all the outage receipts and deliveries.
Sample Information:
WELL MW-50 MW-50 MW-49 MW-49 SAMPLE POINT 42' DEPTH 67' DEPTH 25.5' DEPTH 42' DEPTH SAMPLE DATE 3//22/06 3/22/06 3/22/06 3/22/06 MW-42 49' DEPTH 3/23/06
James Noggle - STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Rage:34]
James Noggie-STATE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Page 3]
I MW-42 78' DEPTH MW-36 26' DEPTH MW-36 52' DEPTH MW-36 41' DEPTH Thanks Ron Sachatello 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 From: Lavera, Ron Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:27 PM To: Sachatello, Ronald
Subject:
FW: STATE SPLIT SAMPLES - Not Received by Lab
<mailto:RLaVera@ entergy.com> RLaVera@entergy.com 914-736-8433 914-736-8419 FAX Indian Point 3 Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Indian Point Energy Center 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 From: Timothy Rice [3]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:40 AM To: Croulet, Donald; Lavera, Ron; Axelson, William L Cc: rps02@health.state.ny.us
Subject:
STATE SPLIT SAMPLES - Not Received by Lab Hello Bill/Ron/Don, DOH just called asking if I could help track down the whereabouts of the samples that were recently shipped to Wadsworth Labs.
ggle-__§_T,ýýTE SPLIT SAMPLE COORDINATION Ja 1ýO
.. m.s....g.e.......S.LIT.
AMPLE C D I T I*ONP ge 4 !1 They have yet to arrive.
Can one/any of you provide the following information:
Identification, and date, of samples collected as splits.
Date and method of shipping.
Address and name of person they were shipped to.
And whether you can find out where the samples are at this time, and the anticipated delivery date and time.
Please e-mail this info to me and Robert Snyder (see cc for this message) as soon as possible.
Thank you, Tim Rice CC:
"Axelson, William Lm <WAxelso@entergy.com>, "Hinrichs, Gary H"
<ghinric@entergy.com>, "Mayer, Donald M" <DMayerl @entergy.com>, "Croulet, Donald K"
<dcroule@entergy.com>, "Scholtens, William" <wscholt@entergy.com>, "Lavera, Ronald"
<RLavera @ entergy.com>, "'jdn @ nrc.gov'" <jdn @ nrc.gov>, "'jrwl @ nrc.gov"' <jrwl @ nrc.gov>, "Bowman, Greg " <GBowm9O@cc--exsO3.prod.entergy.com>