ML061560557

Part 21 Report Submitted 3/31/06; Response to Request for Additional Information

ML061560557
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	05/25/2006
From:	Bandukwala R Flowserve Corp
To:	Omid Tabatabai Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
+sunsimjr=200606
Download: ML061560557 (203)

Text

FLOWSERVE May 25, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Attention: Omid Tabatabai, Reactor Systems Engineer

Subject:

PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3/31/06

Reference:

Request for Additional Information (copy attached)

This letter is provided in response to the attached request and the conference call from 5/18/06. The background information is intended to provide a better understanding of the reasoning behind the Flowserve responses that follow.

Background Information The reported valve is a replacement for valves originally supplied by the Anchor / Darling Valve Company (A/DV) in 1991. A/DV manufactured four 8" Tilting Disc Check (TDC) valves for Diablo Canyon. Two valves were supplied with an inspection port on the left side. Two valves were supplied with an inspection port on the right side. The inspection ports do not affect the valve operability.

The Anchor/Dading Tilting Disc Check (TDC) relies on a counterweight to position the disc for closure. The counterweight is integrally cast to the disc. The basic operation of the TDC is as follows:

• Flow in the direction of the flow arrow rotates the disc open.

• The weight of the counterweight rotates the disc towards the seat as the flow decreases.

• Flow in the direction opposite of the flow arrow drives the disc into the seat and provides the sealing force.

The four TDC's for Diablo Canyon were originally manufactured based on the standard A/DV design. Two valves (one of each inspection port configuration) shipped in January of 1991. The standard design is supplied for a horizontal pipeline application. At the time of the January shipment, the certified drawing (W9023267, Rev. A) included note 4, which read WVALVE TO BE INSTALLED IN HORIZONTAL RUN OF PIPE WITH BONNET ON TOP AND HINGE PINS HORIZONTAL." At a later date, A/DV was informed that the valves were to be installed in a vertical pipeline.

PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3/31=06 Flom-serve response to NRC request for additional kiformation Page I of 5

In a vertical application, the standard Anchor/Darling TDC design has the potential to stay open. When the valve opens fully, the center of gravity of the counterweight travels past the top-dead-center position. Therefore, the weight holds the valve open instead of driving it towards the seat. The typical modification is to alter the counterweight configuration and shift its center of gravity to prevent it from traveling beyond the point of top-dead center when the valve is fully opened.

In this case, two of the valves had already shipped and the remaining valves were nearing completion. The typical modification would have required either a new disc casting or extensive rework. Through discussions with the customer, the problem was resolved by welding an extension to the counterweight. When the disc is rotated fully open, the counterweight contacts the body at a point above the seat ring and acts as a travel stop. The welded extension prevented the counterweight center of gravity from traveling past top-dead-center by limiting the disc rotation. AIDV modified the 2 valves remaining at their facility. The 2 valves that had already shipped were modified in the field by the customer. Note 4 was revised to indicate that the discs were modified for a vertical application resulting in drawing W9023267, Rev. B.

The Anchor Darling Valve Company became Flowserve - Williamsport in 1997. By May of 2003, Flowserve had closed the Williamsport facility and moved all associated engineering and manufacturing activities to Flowserve - Raleigh.

PG&E purchase order 125492 was received by Flowserve - Raleigh in June of 2005. A replacement valve was ordered for the 2 valves that were originally supplied with a right hand inspection port. The purchase order required source inspection and included Source Inspection Plan No.: DEC033005. Section 2 of the source inspection plan included a requirement to verify that the disc is modified per detail C on drawing W9023267, Rev. B.

Flowserve drawing W9023267, Rev. B does not include a detail C. When Flowserve questioned the requirement, the customer provided a copy of the drawing. The supplied drawing included revisions that were performed by the customer. Detail C had been added by the customer and specifically details the dimensions of the counterweight extension presumably as modified at the site. Detail C requires an extension that is 1-3/8 inches long.

The Flowserve Applications Engineer processed the contract to provide exactly what the customer ordered. New casting drawings were generated to provide a disc with the specified dimensions. The engineer believed that valve operability with these dimensions had been confirmed by the customer.

PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3131/06 Flowserve response to NRC request for additional information Page 2 of 5

The responses listed below correlate directly to the attached information request.

A. Extent of Condition

1. The reported valve is a similar concept but a totally different design. The Flowserve -

Raleigh facility does not manufacture the NAF tilting check valve.

2. The reported valve is unique.

3. The typical modification for a vertical application shifts the counterweight center of gravity without limiting disc rotation. The 4 valves manufactured in 1991 were the only valves modified in this fashion. The reported valve is the only valve ever supplied with the new disc casting manufactured to the detail C dimensions.

4. Numerous Anchor Darling TDC's have been supplied to the nuclear industry, but the four valves supplied in 1991 to Diablo Canyon are the only ones that were modified for a vertical application in a manner similar to the one that was reported. They are SIN's EB539-1-1, EB539-1-2, EB539-3-1, and EB539-3-2.

B. Part 21 Reportability

5. PlOP 36-40-03-06 is attached for your review.

6. Upon receiving word of problems at the site, Flowserve initiated Complaint Report number 4376. As the complaint was evaluated, Flowserve determined that corrective action was necessary, which resulted in the issuance of Quality Program Corrective Action Plan (QPCAP) number 169. The QPCAP process requires a determination of whether or not a Part 21 evaluation is required. Since the valve is 'one-of-a-kind',

Flowserve determined that a formal evaluation was not necessary.

Flowserve representatives that were on-site at the utility indicated that the customer was in agreement with our position. Flowserve was surprised when a Part 21 was issued.

Based on the customer's position, Flowserve revisited the question of Part 21 reportability, initiated 10 CFR 21 File No. 22, and again concluded that this was not a reportable instance. Copies of QPCAP 169 and 10 CFR 21 File No. 22 are attached.

7. The incident associated with the Part 21 reported in August of 2001 is not related to this TDC. A swing check valve design is significantly different from a TDC. The issues regarding the 2001 report are significantly different as well.

PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3/31/06 Flowserve response to NRC request for additional Information Page 3 of 5

In February of 1993, BW/IP, in Los Angeles, CA, issued a Part 21 report on 47-150#

bolted bonnet swing check valves. The problem was limited to valves and spare part disc assemblies that were supplied by Borg Warner in 1977 or earlier. Subsequent to the initial report, BW/IP determined that the problem was not limited to 4" 150# swing checks with bolted bonnets but could exist on all Borg Warner 3" and 4" swing check designs supplied in 1977 or earlier. Whether or not this extension of the problem was officially reported is unknown.

The Borg Warner product line was moved to Flowserve - Williamsport in 1998. In May of 2001, a utility contacted Flowserve - Williamsport with the same problem on a 40-1500#

pressure seal swing check valve. Since Flowserve - Williamsport was not sure that the extension of the problem was ever reported, a follow-up report was issued in August of 2001.

A copy of OPER-1, the Flowserve - Williamsport procedure for determining Part 21 reportability, is attached for your review.

8. The issue originally identified in 1993 and again reported in 2001 was applicable to standard designs supplied by Borg Warner in 1977 and earlier. All 3" and 4" swing checks supplied throughout that period had the potential for this problem. The TDC supplied to Diablo Canyon differs in that it is the first and only one ever supplied with the new disc casting that resulted in bonnet interference.

C. Testing

9. Historically, the operability of the Anchor Darling Swing and Tilting Disc Check valves is dependent on whether or not the disc swings through the body without interference.

Excess material on the body casting can cause interference and prevent or hinder operability. The procedure allowed the functional test prior to bonnet installation so that areas of interference could be easily identified and corrected. Flowserve is not aware of any other check valves that did not function properly due to interference with the bonnet.

Swing and Tilting Disc Check valves are the only valves that were tested in this manner.

As corrective action, the procedure was revised to require operability verification after assembly is completed.

10. MS 7252 revisions 3 and 4 are attached for your review along with the test report for the reported valve. The valve was tested to revision 3. Section 6.4 was changed in revision 4 as part of the corrective action associated with this incident.

11. MS 7252 is the generic test procedure.

12. MS 7252 is the generic test procedure.

PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3131/06 Flowserve response to NRC request for additional Information Page 4 of 5

D. Design Chanae Control

13. PlOP 36-70-03-24 is attached for your review.

14. Since the disc dimensions were specified by the customer, the engineer presumed that they represented the valves as modified by the customer. For this reason, he processed the order as a customer specified requirement and did not recognize it as a design change. He did not layout the design with the new disc dimensions. He simply generated the new drawings based on the customer supplied data.

15. Even though the dimensions were supplied by the customer, the engineer should have recognized that this was a design change and followed the procedure with regard to design verification. The engineer involved in this incident was made aware of this error.

A training session with all Design Engineers, Applications Engineers, and Draftsman is scheduled for June of 2006.

Copies of the original purchase order and source inspection plan are enclosed along with the above referenced procedures and other documents. A list of all the attachments is also included. Flowserve does not have a copy of the licensee's root cause investigation report.

Please let us know, if anything else is needed.

If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (919) 831-3304.

Rafiq A. Bandukwalfa, Manager Quality Assurance Flowserve - Raleigh Operations 1900 S. Saunders St.

Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Tel: (919) 831-3304 E-mail: rbandukwala@fiowserve.com PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3131106 Flowserve response to NRC request for additional information Page 5 of 5

FLOWSERVE List of Attached Documents

1. NRC Request for Additional Information

2. PG&E purchase order 125492 with Source Inspection Plan No.: DEC033005

3. Design Specification 8179, Rev 2N

4. Flowserve drawing W9023267 Rev. B

5. Flowserve drawing W9023267 Rev. B with customer revisions including DETAIL C

6. Quality Program Corrective Action Plan (QPCAP) # 169 including Complaint Report 4376

7. 10 CFR 21 File No. - 22

8. Flowserve test procedure MS 7252 revision 3

9. Flowserve test procedure MS 7252 revision 4

10. Flowserve - Raleigh Part 21 notification procedure 36-40-03-06

11. Flowserve - Williamsport Part 21 evaluation procedure OPER-1

12. Flowserve - Raleigh design control procedure 36-70-03-24 PG&E - Diablo Canyon Part 21 Report submitted 3/31/06 Flowserve response to NRC request for additional Information

Request for Additional Information Part 21 On March 31, 2006 Pacific Gas & Electric notified the NRC of a defective component received from Flowserve, Flow Control Division, of Raleigh, North Carolina. The component is an 8-inch tilting disk check valve, vendor Assembly Drawing W9023267, that PG&E received for use in the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System.

During preoperational tests the valve failed to perform its intended safety function of closing, which could have resulted in the loss of one RHR pump, had itbeen installed. The notification included pictures of the valve, which appears to be similar to a NAF tilting check valve shown on the flowserve.com web site.

A. Fxtent of Condition

1. Is the defective valve reported by PG&E similar to the NAF tilting check valve?

2. Is the defective valve similar to any other valves offered by Flowserve?

3. Ifthe defective valve is unique, how does it differ from the valve(s) referenced in RAI #s 1, 2 above.

4. Provide a list of valves similar to the reported valve that Flowserve has supplied to nuclear utilities, including applicable procurement information such as procurement ID,date, and nuclear plant B. Part 21 Reportabllitv

5. Provide a copy of the Flowserve procedure for determining 10CFR21.21 reportability, in effect when the determination was made for the valve supplied to PG&E.

6. Provide the documented Flowserve evaluation that concluded that the defect was not reportable under 10CFR21.21.

7. A defective swing check valve was previously reported by Flowserve on August 23, 2001. The valve did not fully open during pre-operational testing due to excessive weld buildup between the disk and stud. Provide the same information for this valve as requested in RAI #s 5,6 above.

8. Provide a discussion as to why Flowserve concluded that the valve reported by PG&E on March 31, 2006 was not reportable as compared to the one Flowserve reported on August 23, 2001.

C. Testlno

9. The reported valve failed to open during pre-operational testing by PG&E. Reportedly, the valve failure was not detected by Flowserve because the valve was not fully assembled during functional testing.

Provide the basis for verifying valve functionality with a partially assembled valve. Is this practice typical for Flowserve valve functional verification testing?

10. Provide the test procedure(s) used for the Flowserve functional verification test. Provide the documentation for testing of the reported valve.

11. Provide the generic test procedure for valve functional verification testing.

12. Ifthis procedure differs from the testing procedure used for the reported valve, provide a discussion of the differences. Explain why other tested valves would not exhibit similar functional deficiencies.

D. Deslan Chanae Control

13. Provide the procedure(s) used for controlling design changes.

14. Provide the design change documents applicable to the reported valve.

15. Discuss why the inadequacy of the design changes for the reported valve were not discovered during the design change process.

S:ANRCRALPART 21.WPD

ýkQ5 545 4514 P. 1 Jun 02 05 11:02a r !rLE Diablo Canaon PURCHiASE ORDER N PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 01 TO :

FLOOWSER CO. BUYER: W. LEWIS ATTENTI  : TERESA CHRISTISON ( 805 ) 545 - 4890 1900 so H SAUNDERS STREET RALEIGH N 602 SUPPLIERS PHONE NUMBER:

( 919 ) 831 - 3207 X SHIP TO: DCPP RECEIVING - PISMO BEACH BILL TO: PG&E 800 PRICE CANYON ROAD PO BOX 7760 PISMO BEACH CA 93449 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7760 (800) 756-PAID PAYMENT TERMS: NET 30 DAYS SHIP VIA OR FOB TERMS FREIGHT TERMS: FREIGHT COLLECT THIS IS A NON-CONFIRMING ORDER SENT VIA FAX. NO HARD COPY WILL BE MAILED UNLESS REQUESTED.

CONTACT BILL LEWIS @ 805-545-4890 FOR SHIPPING INFO.

REFERENCE QUOTE 13615A FOR PRICE & DELIVERY.

ANY DEVIATION TO THE QUALITY OR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PURCHASE ORDER SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BUYER.

THE SUPPLIER SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH THE ORDER WITHOUT A CHANGE ORDER APPROVING THE DEVIATION.

TERMS & CONDITIONS DCPP GC-2 APPLY TO THIS ORDER.

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

RMS DISTRIBUTION: 1.SUPPLIER 2.MF449 3.PURCHASING 4.SOURCE INSP

2 805 545 4514 P.

Jun 02 05 11:02a E Diablo Canuon f PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 02 IOl QTY IUNITI PG&E CODE I DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICE U-1 1 EA 95 7402 VALVE 8" CHECK 600# SS BW ENDS FLOWSERVE # W9023267 ASME SECT III SUB SECT NC $56,746.0000 MFGR : FLOWSERVE CORP.

PART #: W9023267 101 1 MISC. CHARGE; SEE COMMENTS T $2,600.00 W/RH INSPECTION PORT AND SCH 408 BW ENDS REPLACEMENT FOR SERIAL NUMBERS EB539-3-1 AND EB539-3-2 VALVE TECHNICAL, QUALITY, DOCUMENTATION PER SPEC 8179 REV 2N, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AND A/D DRAWING W9023267.

SUB SECTION ND, 1989 EDITION.

REF: A/D DWG W9023267 FLOWSERVE TO SUBMIT LATEST REVISION OF THE ABOVE DRAWING TO PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

FOR INSTALLATION IN VERTICAL (FLOW-UP) APPLICATIONS INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT TAG NO. PER SECTION 2, PARAGRAPH 2.2.11.C OF SPEC 8179 DOES NOT APPLY.

$2600.00 MISC CHARGE ADDED FOR DESIGN & SEISMIC REPORT.

-. DELIVERY DATE: 12/27/05

- SCHEDULED SHIPPING INFO: 12/23/2005

- SHIPPING POINT: RALEIGH NC NOT A CONFIRMING ORDER.

ITEM 1 TO BE SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES:

1. 319 1 MARKING - TAGGING # 399 1 PACKAGING, HANDLING AND S

1. 400 3 DO NOT SUBSTITUTE # 405 1 P.O. REQUIREMENTS - CERT

1. 418 8 SOURCE INSPECTION - SPECI # 425 MARKING - SERIAL NUMBER I

1. 894 3 DOCUMENTATION - TECHNICAL # 1015 4 VALVE DOCUMENTATION SUBMI

1. 4000 5 10CFR21 REQUIREMENTS FOR # 4002 3 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT

1. 5000 2 COMMERCIAL TERMS # 6761 ASME III - SUBSECTION NC

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

3 805 545 4514 P.

Jun 02 05 11:03a &E Diablo Canuon PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 03 ITEM I TO BE SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES: (CONTINUED)

1. 10153 8 FLOWSERVE CORP RALEIGH, N CLAUSE DEFINITIONS FOLLOW FINAL LINE ITEM THE GOODS FURNISHED UNDER THIS PURCHASE ORDER ARE SUBJECT TO EXPEDITING BY THE BUYER OR THE BUYER'S DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. THE BUYER OR THE BUYER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH FREE ACCESS DURING WORKING HOURS TO THE SELLER'S PLANTS AND THOSE OF ITS SUB-SUPPLIERS FOR EXPEDITING PURPOSES. SELLER SHALL SUPPLY SCHEDULES, PROGRESS REPORTS AND UNPRICED COPIES OF THE SELLER' S PURCHASE ORDERS AS NECCESARY FOR THE BUYER'S USE IN EXPEDITING.

SELLER SHALL NOTIFY BUYER IN WRITING OF ANY ACTUAL OR ANTICIPATED DELAYS IMMEDIATELY UPON THEIR DISCOVERY.

SUCH NOTICE WILL INCLUDE ESTIMATED PERIOD OF DELAY, CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS BEING TAKEN, CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION 319 1 MARKING - TAGGING ITEM SHALL BE TAGGED OR MARKED FOR SHIPMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING:

1) PG&E PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER

2) PG&E PURCHASE ORDER ITEM NUMBER

3) SUPPLIER'S CATALOGUE, PART AND/OR DRAWING NUMBER

4) MATERIAL SPECIFICATION NUMBER AS APPROPRIATE WHEN THE ABOVE DESIGNATED MARKINGS ARE NOT POSSIBLE, PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO IDENTIFY THE ITEM BY SOME OTHER MEANS; WHICH SHALL BE COMMUNICATED TO THE BUYER PRIOR TO SHIPMENT.

399 1 PACKAGING, HANDLING AND SHIPPING SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:

1) INDIVIDUAL PACKAGING AND TAGGING OF THE ITEM (QUANTITIES OF THE SAME ITEM MAY BE PACKAGED TOGETHER).

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

4 11:03a PG&E Diablo Canuon 805 545 4514 p.

Jun 02 05 (

PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC.GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 04 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION

2) PACKAGING, HANDLING AND SHIPPING NECESSARY TO ASSURE THAT THE QUALITY OF THE ITEM IS NOT DEGRADED DURING TRANSIT.

3) ANY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REQUIRED FOR HANDLING OR PRESERVATION OF THE ITEM WHILE IN STORAGE.

400 3 DO NOT SUBSTITUTE THERE SHALL BE ABSOLUTELY NO SUBSTITUTIONS WITHOUT PRIOR PG&E BUYER APPROVAL. THE ITEM SUPPLIED MUST BE AS SPECIFIED BY THIS PURCHASE ORDER BY PART NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION.

PG&E RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SUBSTITUTE MATERIAL AND RETURN IT AT THE VENDOR'S EXPENSE.

SUBSTITUTIONS INCLUDE CHANGES TO THE FIT, SHAPE, SIZE, MATERIAL MAKE-UP, OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS, OR PART NUMBER.

405 1 P.O. REQUIREMENTS - CERT OF CONFORMANCE SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE STATING ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE PURCHASE ORDER HAS BEEN

.MET 418 8 SOURCE INSPECTION - SPECIAL TEST / GENERAL - NOTIFY NQS SUBJECT TO PG&E SOURCE INSPECTION DURING PRODUCTION AUTHORIZED PG&E SOURCE INSPECTORS SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO SUPPLIER'S AND SUBSUPPLIER'S WORK LOCATIONS.

PG&E INSPECTORS HAVE AUTHORITY TO STOP WORK AND CAN REFUSE RELEASE OF THE ITEM IF PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THOSE FOR DOCUMENTATION, ARE NOT MET BY THE SUPPLIER OR SUBSUPPLIER. SUPPLIER SHALL REQUIRE SUBSUPPLIERS PERFORMING WORK PURSUANT TO THIS PURCHASE ORDER TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CLAUSE.

BEFORE STARTING ANY WORK, SUPPLIER SHALL NOTIFY THE PG&E NUCLEAR QUALITY SERVICES (NQS) SECTION AND PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

1. PG&E PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER

2. FACTORY JOB IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

3. FACTORY ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER

4. FACTORY CONTACT NAME

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

5 02 05 11:03a FqLE Diablo Canuon U5 545 4514 p.

Jun PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 05 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION

5. PRODUCTION STARTING TIME PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO.

NUCLEAR QUALITY SERVICES P.O. BOX 56 AVILA BEACH, .CA 93424 (805) -545-6156 FAX: (805)-545-4514 THE SUPPLIER SHALL OBTAIN A WRITTEN RELEASE FROM THE SOURCE INSPECTOR PRIOR TO SHIPMENT. THE RELEASE SHALL ACCOMPANY THE MATERIAL BEING SHIPPED.

425 MARKING - SERIAL NUMBER IDENTIFICATION SUPPLIER SHALL TAG, MARK OR IDENTIFY ITEM BY SERIAL NUMBER 894 3 DOCUMENTATION - TECHNICAL INFORMATION IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT MATERIAL SUPPLIERS NOTIFY PG&E OF ALL CHANGES TO TECHNICAL INFORMATION PERTINENT TO THE DESIGN, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF THE COMPONENT. IF THE SUPPLIER KNOWS OF SUCH CHANGES, THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION IS TO BE SHIPPED WITH THE MATERIAL TO DIABLO CANYON. ADDITIONALLY, FOR SAFETY RELATED PURCHASES ONLY, A DUPLICATE SET OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHALL BE FORWARDED TO:

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO ATTN: LEAD: PROCURE PLANT MATERIALS 115/2 PO BOX 56 AVILA BEACH, CA 93424 EXAMPLES OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION ARE AS FOLLOWS:

A) UPDATES TO OPERATION, CALIBRATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS, INSTRUCTIONS OR SERVICE BULLETINS; B) REVISED TECHNICAL DATA, DESIGN OR OPERATIONAL LIMITS, AND IN-SERVICE OR BENCH TEST PROCEDURES; C) CHANGES TO REPLACEMENT PARTS LISTS, LUBRICANTS OR RECOMMENDED REPAIR/RECALIBRATION/REPLACEMENT INTERVALS; AND D) RESULTS OF SUPPLIER EVALUATION OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE,

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

Jun 02 05 11:03a rvILE Diablo Canuon 805 545 4514 p.6

(-(

PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 06 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS OR FAILURES, AND QUALIFICATION TESTS.

1015 4 VALVE DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTALS DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PER THE SPEC SHALL BE SENT DIRECTLY TO:

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC

.P.O. BOX 56 -OR-9 MILES NW OF AVILA BEACH (OTHER THAN U.S. MAIL)

AVILA BEACH, CA 93424 ATTN: BUYER (NOTED ON PO)

MAIL STOP 115/2 NOTE: OUTLINE DRAWINGS DO NOT NEED TO BE RESUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL IF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY PG&E. PO WILL MAKE REFERENCE TO THE APPLICABLE DRAWING NUMBER AND CURRENT REVISION APPROVED FOR FABRICATION BY PG&E.

4000 5 10CFR21 REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED ITEMS THE PROVISIONS OF 10CFR21 APPLY TO THIS ITEM. IF THE SUPPLIER PROVIDES ANY INFORMATION TO THE NRC REGARDING THIS ITEM, THE INFORMATION SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED, AT THE SAME TIME TO THE MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE, PG&E IN C/O THE PG&E PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR @ DCPP, PO BOX 56, AVILA BEACH, CA.

93424, MAILSTOP 115/2.

.THE SUPPLIER SHALL REPORT ALL NONCONFORMANCES WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RELIABILITY, PERFORMANCE OR INTER-CHANGEABILITY OF THIS ITEM. THIS REPORT SHALL INCLUDE THE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE NONCONFORMANCE DISPOSITIONS.

ALL DISPOSITIONS WHICH DO NOT RETURN THE ITEM TO THE CONDITION STATED IN PG&E APPROVED DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL BE APPROVED BY PG&E PRIOR TO THE SHIPMENT OF THE ITEM.

4002 3 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS - GENERAL ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REPRODUCIBLE AND IDENTIFY THE PURCHASED ITEM BY PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION NECESSARY TO UNIQUELY ASSOCIATE A DOCUMENT WITH THE ITEM TO WHICH IT APPLIES.

ELECTRONIC SUBMITTING OF DOCUMENTS IS PREFERABLE TO HARDCOPY.

SUBMITTAL MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY E-MAIL ATTACHMENT OR MAILED

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

Jun 02 05 11:04a Pn&E Diablo Canton 8_Q5 545 4514 p.7 PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS .andELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 07 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION 3-1/2" (1.44MB) DOS FLOPPY DISK OR OPTICAL DISC (CDROM).

MULTIPLE DRAWINGS MAY BE PLACED ON THE SAME DISK. SUPPLIER SHALL LABEL THE DISK TO INDICATE CONTENTS. SUPPLIER TO COORDINATE WITH THE PG&E BUYER.

THE ACCEPTABLE ELECTRONIC FORMATS FOR DRAWING IN ORDER OF PRIORITY ARE:

i. INTERGRAPH MICROSTATION VERSION 5 OR HIGHER (DGN, VECTOR)

2. AUTOCAD VERSION 11 OR HIGHER (DWG, VECTOR)

3. FILE FROM OTHER CAD PACKAGES MAY BE CONVERTED TO ANSI DXF FORMAT (VECTOR)

4. RASTER CONFORMING TO CCITT GROUP 4 (TIFF GROUP 4) IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE.

REQUIREMENTS OF.HARD COPY SUBMITTALS ARE AS FOLLOWS-.

EACH REPRODUCIBLE FURNISHED BY SUPPLIER SHALL BE MADE FROM A CLEAN ORIGINAL TRACING OF MICROFILM QUALITY. THE REPRODUCIBLE SHALL BE RIGHT READING PHOTOGRAPHIC MYLAR FOR DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL.

SUBMITTALS 11" X 17" OR SMALLER MAY BE ON 20-POUND WHITE BOND PAPER THAT CAN BE LEGIBLY REPRODUCED ON A COPYING MACHINE.

EVERY DETAIL AND FIGURE SHALL BE LEGIBLE WHEN REPRODUCED FROM A 35-MM MICROFILM COPY.

THE CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTANCE OF REPRODUCIBLE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

1) IMAGE - LINES AND LETTERING SHALL BE UNIFORM IN SHARPNESS AND DENSITY.

2) LETTERING - LETTERING SHALL BE DENSE WITH UNIFORM CHARACTERS THAT ARE OPEN, WELL ROUNDED AND UNCROWDED.

3) BACKGROUND DENSITY - BACKGROUND DENSITIES SHALL BE UNIFORM ACROSS THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT WITH GOOD LINE TO BACKGROUND CONTRAST. IF THE ORIGINAL TRACING WAS CREATED WITH PASTE-UP OR IMAGE TRANSFER MATERIAL THAT NEGATES PRODUCING A GOOD TRANSMITTED LIGHT REPRODUCTION, THE ORIGINAL TRACING SHALL BE PHOTOGRAPHED WITH REFLECTED LIGHT AND THE -'MYLAR CREATED FROM THE RESULTING NEGATIVE AFTER RETOUCHING.

5000 2 COMMERCIAL TERMS

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

Jun 02 05 11:04a r.PLE Diablo Canvon (q5 545 4514 p.8 PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 08 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION MATERIAL EXPECTATION CLAUSE:

SELLER WARRANTS THAT THE GOODS PROCURED ON THIS PURCHASE SHALL BE FREE FROM DEFECTS IN DESIGN AND SHALL CONFORM IN ALL RESPECTS TO THE TERMS OF THIS PURCHASE ORDER, AND SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ON THE ORDER, AND OF BEST QUALITY, IF NO QUALITY IS STATED. WHEN THIS DOES NOT OCCUR, GOODS WILL BE RETURNED TO THE SELLER AT THE SELLERS EXPENSE AND NEW MATERIAL RETURNED OR A CREDIT ISSUED. THIS DIRECTION WILL BE GIVEN TO THE SELLER BY THE BUYER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.

6761 ASME III - SUBSECTION NC REQUIREMENTS 1989 EDITION ITEM SHALL BE FABRICATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASME BOILER

& PRESSURE VESSEL CODE, SECTION III, SUBSECTION NC, 1989.

EDITION NO ADDENDA.

SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE TO THE ABOVE STATED REQUIREMENTS.

10153 8 FLOWSERVE CORP RALEIGH, MC OPERATIONS QSL ADDRESS A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM, IMPLEMENTED AT THE BELOW ADDRESS, HAS BEEN PREQUALIFIED BY PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC.

ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE DELIVERED FROM, AND ALL DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE TRACEABLE TO THIS ADDRESS. PG&E SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ENTER THE PREMISES OF THE SUPPLIER.

TO WITNESS INSPECTION/TEST ACTIVITIES AND/OR TO CONDUCT SURVEILLANCES OR QUALITY AUDITS. THIS RIGHT SHALL EXTEND TO ALL SUBSUPPLIERS AND SHALL BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE SUPPLIER.

FLOWSERVE CORP.

1900 SOUTH SAUNDERS STREET RALEIGH, NC 27602 ALL CHECK, GATE, GLOBE, VACUUM RELIEF, BALL AND BUTTERFLY VALVES AND SPARE PARTS FOR SAME SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLOWSERVE CORP RALEIGH OPERATIONS QA MANUAL REV 32, DATED 01/15/05.

NON-ASME SAFETY RELATED PARTS AND SAFETY-RELATED PNEUMATIC

• • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE **

Jun 02 05 11:04a n-'E Diablo Canvon 545 4514 (8-05 p.S PURCHASE ORDER PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE ISSUED P 0 NUMBER REV.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT P.O. Box 56 06/02/05 125492 Avila Beach, Ca 93424 PAGE 09 CLAUSE # REV# CLAUSE TITLE AND DEFINITION ACTUATORS, MOTOR OPERTORS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES AS PART OF VALVE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RALEIGH OPERATIONS QA'MANUAL REV 32, DATED 01/15/05 THE PROVISIONS OF ASME SECTION III, SUBSECTION NX-2610 PARAGRAPH (B) SHALL NOT BE UTILIZED FOR ASME SECTION III MATERIAL. ASME SUBSUPPLIERS SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM UTILIZING THE PROVISIONS OP NX2610 (B), UNLESS THE QUALITY OF SUCH MATERIAL IS VERIFIED BY THE SUPPLIER.

• • END OF PURCHASE ORDER **

Jun 02 05 11:05a GELE Diablo Canuon (05 545 4514 P. 10 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOURCE INSPECTION PLAN NO.: DEC033005 DESCRIPTION: Flowserve 8' Check Valve PROJECT: Diablo Canyon Units 1& 2 PC#'. 10570 INTERNAL ORDER# 2~G44029 (&oqs~ib MAT'L REQN. NO.:40242+- '*112-*-S

• P.O. NO.: BUYER: Bill Lewis (805) 545-4890 SUPPLIER: Flowserve Prepared by.: Date:

Approve by:

fi ovy-R.- Date: -a, -- 9 ,* ,--

Purpose:

. The purpose of the Inspection Plan is to systematically identify the Inspector's responsibilities and Inspection actions to assure that components are manufactured and tested in conformance with contract requirements.

Scope of Inspector's Responsibility: Perform Inspection In accordance with the attached checklist.

References:

PG&E Valve Specification 8179, Rev 2N A/D dwg W9023267 Special Instructions:

Any deviations from the attached inspection criteria shall be coordinated thru the preparer and/or buyer prior to releasing shipment. Note: Where the words "ifapplicable appear, the inspector may use "nWa'.

Any programmatic problems with regards to Flowserve's Quality Program noted during the inspection process shall be brought to the attention of Nuclear Quality Services, Mr Robert Carvel @ 1-805-545-3268

J-00E Diablo Canron p. 11 Jun 02 05 llz05a r- 5 545 4514 INSPECTION PLAN NO.: DEC033005 Page 2 of 4

1. Verify the following quality and documentation requirements for valve assemblies have been complied with prior to shipment.

a. Suppliers on Flowserve's Approved Vendor List have provided the items classified as ASME pressure retaining as identified on the PG&E approved drawing(s) with ASME Sect IIl and IOCFR21 invoked.

95-7402

b. CMTR's for above items meet the applicable material specs and are certified/marked in accordance with ASME Sect III; materials to be per the approved PG&E dig.

95-7402

c. Items classified as non-ASME safety related parts as Identified on the PG&E approved drawing(s) have been: (1) provided by suppliers on Flowserve's Approved Vendor Ust with IOCFR21 requirements invoked and/or (2) been dedicated by Flowserve (and/or a supplier on Flowserve's Approved Vendor List in accordance with Flowserve's commercial grade dedication program.

95-7402

2. Witness the following testing, dimensional checks and weighing activities prior to shipment

a. Dimensional verification as Indicated on the PG&E approved vendor drawing; body &bonnet wall thickness per Flowserve shop dwg.

95-7402

b. Hydrostatic shell per PG&E approved dwg 95-7402

a. Verify disc Is modified per detail C on Dwg. W9023267, Rev B 95-7402

12 Jun 02 05 11:05a RE Diablo Can,,on 605 S45 4514 P.

INSPECTION PLAN NO.: DEC033005 Page 3 of 4

d. Seat Leakage per PG&E approved dwg.

95-7402

e. Valve weight shall be within +/- 10% of the weight shown on the PG&E approved dwg. If weight exceeds this limit, Flowserve shall resubmit revised drawing showing the as-built weight.

95-7402

f. Verify all instruments, measuring devices and test equipment used Ina thru e above are currently calibrated.

95-7402

3. Review the final documentation package to insure it includes the following prior to valve shipment. Documentation per 8179, Rev 2N

a. CMTR's for pressure retaining items 95-7402

b. Manufacturers Certification of Compliance to the Purchase Order 95-7402

c. Code data report 95-7402

d. Weld records and post weld heat treat records for ASME pressure retaining Hems, if applicable 95-7402

e. NDE test results per ASME Sect Ill, if applicable 95-7402

Jun 02 05 11:05& u-'-LE Diablo Canvon 05 545 4514 p. 13 INSPECTION PLAN NO.: DEC033005 Page 4 of 4

f. Wall thickness records for body & bonnet 95-7402

g. Hydrostatic and seat leakage test reports 95-7402

h. Certificate of cleanliness 95-7402

4. Final Inspection and Preparation for packaging and shipping.

a. Verify valves are marked, stamped and tagged In accordance with ASME Sect III, Article NCA-8000.

95-7402

5. THE RELEASE FOR SHIPMENT FORM AND A COPY OF THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS TO BE FAXED TO: BILL LEWIS, 805-545-4514. PLEASE CALL AND ADVISE FAX IS COMING. A COPY OF THE RELEASE FOR SHIPMENT FORM SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED TO FLOWSERVE.

INSPECTION COMPLETE Signed:

Inspector Date

Jun 02 05 11:06a r-ILE Diablo Canuon P15 545 4514 p.14 ATTACHMENT B PURCHASE ORDER NO.

INSPECTION PLAN NO.

RELEASE FOR SHIPMENT TO: PREPARER: ( ) COMPLETE RELEASE Diablo Canyon Power Plant P.O. Box 56 ( ) PARTIAL RELEASE Avila Beach CA 93424 FAX: 805 545 4514 Procurement 805 545-3765 QC FROM: Vendor Quality Control The intention of this form is to provide DCPP with immediate notification of the status of the items inspected by Vendor Quality Control at a suppliers facility. The final record of acceptance of any source inspected item is based strictly on the associated source Inspection plan once it has been completed by the inspector. Please be advised that with regard to the equipment listed below, there may be additional inspections, test or dedication activities required to be performed at DCPP not included in the source inspection plan.

(} The Items described below have been inspected at the suppliers facility and have been released for shipment with no deviations .from the inspection plan.

(J The items described below have been inspected at the suppliers facility and have been released for shipment to DCPP. Any exceptions or deviations have been approved by the responsible organization and documented on the Action Request no. listed below.

Action Request no.

The preparer of the inspection plan will provide the Action Request no. to the inspector.

In addition to the Action Request no. the deviations will be documented in the associated Source Inception Report.

Jun 02 05 11:06a Fn&E Diablo Cantion 8,95 545 4514 p.15

() The items described below have been inspected at the suppfler's facility and have been released for shipment to DCPP. However, these items shall be placed on hold by the DCPP Receipt Inspection Section until the following shortages/deviations have been resolved:

PG&E Inspector Date Phone no.

FAX no.

THIS FORM AND THE INSPECTION PLAN CHECK LIST IS TO BE FAXED WITH EACH SHIPMENT TO THE PREPARER OF THE INSPECTION PLAN.

805 545 4514

• 1/

'L12-16-04; S:50AM;DCPP PROCUREMENT 8179, Rev. 2N Design Certification Page I of 1 DESIGN CERTIFCATION FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 DFSIGN CERTIFCATION I, the undersigned, being a registered Professional Engineer and competent in the applicable field of design and related nuclear power plant requirements relative to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Design Specification No. 8179, Revision No. 2N, certify that Design Specification No.

8179, Revision No. NL is correct and complete with respect to the Design and Service Conditions given therein and provides a complete basis for equipment fabrication in accordance with the 1989 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code, Section Hi, Subsection NCA, Article NCA-3250.

Design Specification No. 8179, Revision No. 2N being certified is:

Certified by Kersi J. Dalal P.E.

Registration No. M-16690 State CA Exp. Date 3Q31/2000 Qo j~j Signature A &L -

CD 42-9-2 Date/

Y.-SWP96*31D.DOC

Tzc1Z3 -' use)

,,^..

A  :, ,, : .~,1 acific Gas and Electric Company Diabl:o Canyon Power Plant E Z 91ý P.O. Box 56 Avila Beach CA 93424 *j L Oci] 732 '92 Octobieýt ,1996 TdofnJonson Anchor.Darling VaIM *,. 4C, "4941~0 342t WilIfiati rt PA 17101-0428 Subjeý.PG&E Valve Specification No. 8179 Rev. 21 T,om-, .

Pei oitt telephone conversation today-, enclosed is subJect v~1vessciication.

Shoulo-yoU eed any additional information please contact me at the.phone and fax nos.

fisted doW.'

Procurement Specialist Phone 805 545 4805 Fax 805 545 4514

7.

I-UNCONTROL COPYj SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 REV. 2N DISTRIBUTION W. R. McDowell 123.Mlssion/1542 DCPP 115M2 K J. Dalai DCPP 116/1 D. F. Lashkari DCPP 115M2 V. K. Juneja 245/1I4D K. D. Patel 245/811B L. Pulley 245/853D M. Schletz 245/830E E. P. Nelson DCPP 115/2 S. Allen DCPP 116/1 File No. 161.82 Note 1: This Specification Revision to be used for purchase of all new valves and spare parts for valves originally purchased to this Specification. For all new purchases, the requirements stated herein supplant previously issued commitments via RPEs. Any technical or Q.A. exceptions to this document, that are taken by the vendor, must be evaluated by Procurement Engineering via RPEs, prior to issue of the purchase order.

Y:DPSFT9%*31A.DOC

II0919)5 Page I of NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION CF3.EDI6 ATTACHMENT 8.1 TITLE: SPECIFICATION COVER SHEET PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SPECIFICATION COVER SHEET Specification No.: 8179

Title:

Design Specification for Nuclear Service Valves - Manual. Electric Motor and Pneumatic Operated Project: Diablo Canyon Power Plant. Units I & 2 Date :May 31. 1996 Department/ Group: Regulatory and Design Services I Piping Group Structure, System or Component: Nuclear Service Valves Type or Purpose of Specification: Furnishing and Delivery of Nuclear Service Valves Complying with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Section M, Classes 1. 2. and 3 No. of Sheets: Nuclear Safety Related; IOCFR21 Applies: yes X__no

/./,,q' '/&Y) .Graded PPE

/0 PRPRR SAu

__A__________________

-o "ý V AeL Quality: yes.X__.,no_

VERIFIER : 6/4911%

COORD SECT:

A COORD SECT:

SEISMIC APPROVAL: k________"______

4 &--5" //r(0 45 -1 ENVIRON. APPROVAL0 0 g -q-q LEAD DIR APPROVAL,..

0/

Enter the the registered egineer s full name and registration numter, or stamp, or seal and expiration date in this space.

RECORDS OF REVISIONS Revision Revised Verified Coord APPROVAL Number Daft Reasoas for Revision BY BY SQ BEQ REGIS RDG SDIt I RNGR f 2_4 liflnd0YA 17 _ _ pg.~_ _ W2_ _ _

PACIFIC CAS AND ELECTRIC COKPANY NUCLEAR SAN FRANCISCO6 CALIFORNIA DEPARTKENT OF ENGINEERING

• BLI-611 SPECIFICATION 10. 8179 REVISION NO. I Project File No. 161.82 Nuclear Safety-kelated: Yes X No__

Part 21 of Title 10 of the Code for Federal Regulations (IOCFR21)

Applies: Yes X No

• • (Refer Paragraph 5.5 on Sheet 2-1-16)

DESIGN SPECIFICATION FOR FURNISHING AND DELIVERINC iANUALLY9 ELECTRIC HOTOR AND PNEU*ATICALLY OPERATED STEEL VALVES COMPLYING WITH THE ASHE BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE SECTION III DIVISION 1, CLASSES 1. 2 AND 3 (PG&E DESIGN CLASS I)

FOR NUCLEAR SERVICE AT UNITS I AND 2t DIABLO CANYON SITE BIDDER SIGh HERE TO INDICATE Apý THIS HAS BEEN USED IN PREPARING PROPOSAL Firm C. A. Tidrick By- S. Auer DATE H. J. Jacobson

-t "*

K. L. Herman'

. R. Trealtr tý DATE: 'June 19t

/

PREPARED BY: D. F. Lashkari Q2129A/I

8179, Rev 2N Contents 1-1 CONTENTS NO. OF PAGES DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION 8179 I

ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE, SECTION M CRITERIA LOCATOR FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION 8179 DESIGN SPECIFICATION 8179 PAGE NO.

SECTION 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS i SECTION 2 - DESIGN 5 SECTION 3 - MATERIALS 13 SECTION 4 - VALVE ACTUATORS 17 SECTION 5- QUALITY ASSURANCE 26 SECTION 6 - WELDING 29 SECTION 7 -- NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAM]NATION, TESTS, WALL 33 THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS A*ND INSPECTION SECTION 8 - SHOP CLEANING AND PAI-N7ING 39 SECTION 9 - TAGGING AN.D SI-HIPMIENT PREPARATION 40 SECTION 10 - QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 42 SECTION II - REFERENCED CODES AND STANDARDS 44 ATTACHMENTS NO OF PAGES NO. 1 - VALVE DATA SHEETS (SAMPLES) 3 NO. 2 - ENVIRONMENTAIJSEISMIC QUALIFICATION FIGURES 5 NOTE:(I) Spec 8179, Rev 2N has been revised in its entirety.

(2) General Conditions will be provided in the Purchase Order

8179, Rev. 2N Design Certification Page I of I DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 DESIGN CERTFICATION I, the undersigned, being a registered Professional Engineer and competent in the applicable field of design and related nuclear power plant requirements relative to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Design Specification No. 8179, Revision No. 2N, certify that Design Specification No.

8179, Revision No. 2N, is correct and complete with respect to the Design and Service Conditions given therein and provides a complete basis for equipment fabrication in accordance with the 1989 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code, Section K, Subsection NCA, Article NCA-3250.

Design Specification No. 8179, Revision No. 2N being certified is:

Certified by Kersi J. Dalai I MJE.

Registration No. M-16690 State CA Exp. Date 3/31/2000 Signature 9.

Date 4,i f~-lV1l Y%*D3,P9% 31D.D0C

8 179, Rev 2N Criteria Locator Page I of I ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE, SECTION III CRITERIA LOCATOR FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 Valve Design Specification Criteria W Paragr9ph $)

1 Functions and Boundaries 1.1.1 & 2.1.7 2 Design Requirements 2.1 &2.2 3 Environmental Conditions 2.1.3 &Att. 2 Figures 1,2,3,4 4 Code Classifications 1.1.1(a) 5 Material Requirements including 3.1 & 3.1.3(b)

Impact Testing 6 Operability 2.1.5(c), 2.1.5(h),

4.1, 4.2 & 4.3 7 Effective Code Eddition and Addenda 2.1.1 & Design Certification

8179, Rev 2N SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS 1.1 GENERAL 1.1.1 Specification Coverage: This specification covers the design and procuremewn (furnishing and delivery) requirements for all sizes of manual, electric motor operated and pneumatically operated valves for nuclear service at PG&E's Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units I and 2.

(a) Valves to be supplied under this Specification, hereafter referred to as "valves" if manually operated, or "assemblies" if electric motor or pneumatically operated, shall comply with the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section RI, Division 1, Subsections NB, NC or ND (Class 1, 2, and 3 components, respectively), 1989 Edition, hereafter referred to as the "Code", and the requirements of this Specification. Other requirements or clarifications may be specified inthe specific Request for Bid or Purchase Order accompanying this specification in which case the requirements specified in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order shall prevail. (See specific Request for Bid or Purchase order for "Code Class" applicable to each valve).

(b) Valves and/or assemblies supplied under this Specification are commonly referred to as "PG&E Design Class r" equipment by the Buyer.

1.2 EXTENT OF WORK 1.2.1 Work Included:

(a) Furnishing and delivering valves and/or assemblies in accordance with the requirements of this Specification, Request for Bid or Purchase Order, and "Valve Data Sheets" if issued with either document (b) Each valve and/or assembly shall be supplied complete and ready for immediate installation and service at design conditions. Actuators and accessories shall be shop-mounted on the valves.

1.3 INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED AFTER AWARD 1.3.1 After award, Supplier shall complete and submit to PG&E the Drawings and Data Requirements for PG&E engineering review and approval, in accordance with the 8179, Rev 2N requirements of Paragraphs 1.3.2 through 1.3.5 of this Section. Supplier shall revise and resubmit the drawings incorporating PG&E"s comments as necessary.

1.3.2 The Supplier shall submit a certified (by Registered Professional Engineer) outline drawing (1-reproducible) including bill of materials and dimensions which shall, as a minimum, contain the following information:

(a) Separate weight of valve, actuator and accessories and total weight of valve or assembly. These weights shall be within +/- 10% tolerance for 2 1/2" and larger valves, and within +/- 15% tolerance for 2" and smaller valves from the actual weight ofthe item. The actual weight of the valve assembly (less shipping materials) shall be determined by weighing prior to shipment. When the valve and assembly weights exceed the above tolerance limits, the supplier's drawings shall specify actual weights at the time of valve shipment and shall be resubmitted to the Buyer.

(b) Location of the center of gravity with respecrto all three orthogonal axes shall be provided for the valvelactuator assembly and for each individual major item for which the weight is given (i.e. valve, actuator and accessories).

(c) Final pressure drop across valve at maximum flow rate and the valve fiul open Cv.

(d) Location of switches, position indicator, bypass piping, manual operator, and other equipment.

(e) Special in-line mounting and/or flange requirements. For instance, disc clearance requirements for butterfly valves mounted between flanges.

(f) Parts lists of valve, actuator and accessories, including material-identification, manufacturer's name and model number.

(g) Threaded fasteners including diameter, length, and quantity.

(h) Orientation of actuator relative to valve body, as requested by the Buyer (see Paragraph 2.1.6 and Paragraph 4.1.7).

(i) Welding end preparations.

(j) Valve Design/Service conditions, location, and functional status (e.g.

Active Valve).

8179, Rev 2N (k) Hydrostatic test and Seat Closure test pressure, duration and acceptance criteria/allowable leakage.

Q) Mfinimum wall thickness of valve.

(m) Nondestructive examination requirements (i.e. RT, UT, PT, MT).

(n) Nominal and net port size and port area.

(o) Valve disassembly clearance requirements for both opened/closed positions.

(p) Stroking or closure time from valve closed (0 percent) to open (100 percent) and from valve open (100 percent) to closed (0 percent) under maximum design conditions for electrically or pneumatically actuated valves.

(q) Identification of ASME Code parts and Non-ASME Safety Related parts.

(r) Packing and gasket sizes and materials.

(s) Reference to Purchase Order number, Specification 8179, Rev 2N, Diablo Canyon Site; Unit Number, and valve tag numbers (only if indicated on the Purchase Order).

(t) Installed location intended for valve as indicated or the Valve Data Sheet.

1.3.3 Valve, valve actuator, electric motor and accessories data sheets completed by the manufacturer (Attachment 1).

1.3.4 Schematics and wiring diagram of the power and/or control systems for actuators, and accessories including routing, terminal block locations and enclosures.

1.3.5 Tubing diagrams for pneumatic actuators and schematics and wiring diagrams of the electrical accessories.

1.3.6 In addition to the drawings and documents required in Paragraph 1.3.2 through 1.3.5, this Section, Supplier shall also submit after award I copy of the following information and documents unless otherwise specified, for PG&E review, approval and record.

8179, Rev 2N (a) Certified Design Report/Seismic Analysis, in accordance with Paragraph 2.1.5. Seismic Calculations may not be required for Manual Valves without extended topworks (i.e., gear box or actuator).

(b) Environmental qualification report for electrical components and environmentally qualified air operated valves (not required for manual valves), in accordance with Paragraph 2.1.3.

(c) Functional test procedure and method of analysis in accordance with Paragraph 7.2.4.

(d) Installation, operation and maintenance instruction manuals (2 copies).

(e) Valve characteristics curve when specified in the Purchase Order.

(f) Design calculations for the determination of the minimum required and maximum allowable thrusts for verification of torque switch settings of the motor operated valves and supply air for pneumatic operated valves (see Paragraphs 4.2.1((b) and 4.3.1((b)).

(g) Weak link analysis for electric motor and air operated valves that identifies the limiting component/parts, the calculated stress levels and margins compared to Code allowables, and whether component/part is limited by fracture or loss of function per the requirements of Paragraph 2.1.5().

(h) With the valve shipment, the Supplier shall furnish for each valve the quality assurance records of Paragraph 10.2, as applicable.

1.4 SUBMITTAL OF SUPPLIER'S DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS

1.4.1 General

One set of Supplier's drawings and documents (including instruction manuals) as requested in this Specification shall be mailed to the Buyer for review and approval, at the address given hereunder:

ATTENTION: Buyer (indicated in the Purchase Order)

Mail Stop 115/2 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Diablo Canyon Power Plant P.O. Box 56 Avila Beach, CA 93424 8179, Rev 2N SECTION 2 DESIGN 2.1 VALVE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 2.1.1 Additional Design Requirements: In addition to the ASME B&PV Code, Section MI requirements specified by Paragraph 1.1.1(a), valves shall comply with the requirements of the other Standards, Standard Practices, etc. referred to in this Specification and accompanying Request for Bide or Purchase Order (e.g.

ASME/ANSI, ANSI, MSS, ASTM, NEMA, etc.). The latest editions of these standards shall be used, except for ASME B&PV Code, Section UL in which case the 1989 Edition shall be used.

2.1.2 Design Conditions (Rating): Each valve shall be designed to satisfy the maximum design pressure, temperature, flow and operating pressure drop requirements given in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order. When these specific design conditions are not specified, each valve shall be designed to satisfy the standard "class rating" in accordance with ANSI B 16.34. Rating of electrically or pneumatically actuated 2" and smaller gate and globe valves shall not be less than ANSI B 16.34 Class 1500. All steel valves specified as ANSI Class 1500 rating may be furnished with an interpolated rating that is suitable for design conditions of 2485 psig at 650 F.

2.1.3 Operating (Service) and Environmental Conditions:

(a) Buyer may operate each valve or assemb1ly on a continuous or intermittent service basis at its given operating or design conditions. Each valve or assembly shall also be capable of withstanding the environmental conditions including the accident conditions referred to in Paragraph 2.1.3(c) hereunder. The intended installation location of each valve is indicated on the Valve Data Sheet.

(b) Each electric motor actuator and valve accessory designated as Class IE must be qualified to be functional during and after the accident condition stipulated in Paragraph 2.1.3(c) this Section, for its location specified by the Valve Data Sheet (see also Paragraph 4.1.4).

8179, Rev 2N (c) Environmental Qualification: Plant environmental conditions are as follows:

Outside Containment Inside Containment

• Normal Accident Normal Accident Condition Condition Condition Condition Temperature (F) 110 Att. 2- 120 Att. 2-Figure 1 Figure 3 Pressure (psia) 14.7 Att. 2 - (-)l.Oio Att. 2 -

Figure 2 1.2 psig Figure 4 Relative Humidity 20%-100% 100% 20%- 100% 100%

Spray Composition Boric Acid

& NAOH Solution PPM Boron 2500 PPM PH 8.5 - 10 Spray Duration 24 Hours Gamma Radiation 2x10'* 2.04x10s*. 5.44x10' 2.04x10 (Rads) (40 years) (T.I.D.) (40 years) (T.I.D.)

Beta Radiation 3.3x!0'

• For valves located in "Gas Decay Tank and CVCS Demineralizer" areas (when so indicated on the Valve Data Sheet), the gamma radiation is 4.2xi0e Rads (normal condition) and 4.95x10 Rads (accident condition).

2.1.4 Useful Life: Beginning with the year 1986, Units I and 2 of the Diablo Canyon Site have each an expected power generating life of more than 40 years. To minimize operating cost to the Buyer, Supplier shall furnish valves or assemblies which have a 40 year minimum useful life (excluding standard replacement type items such as packings, gaskets, lubrication, etc.) under the service conditions referred to in Paragraphs 2.1.2 and 2.1.3, this Section. The useful life of each 8179, Rev 2N valve or assembly to be supplied or the parts exempted from the 40 year useful life (i.e. elastomeric parts) shall otherwise be stated in Proposal by Supplier.

2.1.5 Seismic Qualification:

(a) Each valve shall be designed to operate, maintain its pressure retaining integrity and remain undamaged when subjected simultaneously to the combination of its normal operating loading (self weight, pressure, etc.)

and the seismic loading requirements given hereunder. Evidence ofvalve design and assembly seismic qualification shall be provided by Supplier to the Buyer's Engineer in accordance with the requirements of Paragraphs 2.1.5(b) through 2.1.5(i), this Section.

(b) Design Calculations for Valves: All valves with or without extended topworks shall be provided with calculations demonstrating compliance with the Code requirements ofNX-3510, NX-3520, NX-3530 and NX-3540, including the suitability for (1) design pressure - temperature rating, (2) minimum wall thickness of the valve body, and (3) adequacy of the valve body to withstand piping end loads meeting the Service Loading specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(c)(1) of this Section. Valves with extended topworks/structures also require seismic calculations. Seismic calculations are not required for manual valves without extended topworks. Extended topworkslstructures are defined to be a valve or assembly whose center of gravity is located more than one nominal diameter away from the pipe centerline.

(c) Seismic Calculation for Valve or Assembly: Each valve (with extended topworks) or assembly shall be demonstrated capable of withstanding the simultaneous application of the following loads:

(1) The normal operating loads, including pressure, required operating thrust/torque necessary to actuate the valve against the differential pressure, and the weight and inertial effects of the internal components and the valve's topworks (everything above the body).

The required operating torque/thrust shall include the hydrodynamic effects of the fluid during stroking of the valve.

(2) A horizontally applied inertial load equivalent to a double design earthquake acceleration of 6g's in the direction that will create the highest stresses in the valve pressure boundary.

.(3) A vertically applied inertial load equivalent to a double design earthquake acceleration of 6g's.

8 179, Rev 2N (d) Each assembly shall be assumed to be mounted in that orientation in which the loads in Paragraph 2.1.5(c), this Section, give rise to the highest stresses in the valve pressure boundary. Inertial loads shall be assumed to be applied at the center of gravity of the valve topworks and valve parts.

(e) The topworks of the valve assembly shall be designed to have a fundamental frequency of vibration greater than 100 Hz whenever possible.

However, in no case shall the first natural frequency be less than 33 Hz. In either case, the first natural frequency shall be reported to the Buyer. If this minimum requirement cannot be obtained the Buyer shall be notified in the bid documents.

(f) Valves with extended topworks and assemblies shall demonstrate compliance with the above requirements by tests and/or analysis. For all valves with extended topworks and assemblies, an analysis shall also be made to verify that the stresses in the valve pressure boundary are within the allowable stress limits specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(h), this Section. A weak link analysis based on the same service levels (load, temperature.

etc.) shall also be provided as part of the above analysis, or as a separate evaluation. The weak link analysis shall identify the limiting component, part or connection of the valve assembly and its available margin reative to the Code allowable stress, fracture, loss of function or loss of pressure retaining capability as applicable. Identification of potential critical conditions leading to significant reduction of the weak link margins and recommendations of how to prevent occurrence of those conditions shall be provided. Copies of the test data and/or analyses shall be submitted and approved by Buyer's Engineer prior to acceptance of these valves for shipment.

(g) Seismic Qualification Test for Actuator and Externally Mounted Accessory Designated as Class IE:

Each electric motor and pneumatic actuator and externally mounted accessory designated as Seismic/Class IE shall be qualified by a prototype test in accordance with IEEE-344 meeting the seismic loading specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(c), this Section. Mounting brackets for Class IE l switches or other electrical devices mounted to the actuator/valve shall be seismically qualified by test or calculation.

8179, Rev 2N (h) Allowable Stress Limits:

(1) Code Class I valves shall meet the stress limits specified in Code Subsubarticle NB-3520 for the service limit loading specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(h)(3), this Section. It shall be assumed that the stress in the piping at its points of connection to the valve body inlet and outlet connections is at the maximum value permitted by the Code for the connecting pipe at the design conditions specified on the Valve Data Sheet. The pipe loading combination on the valve ends shall be applied in the direction that will cause the maximum stress on the valve body.

(2) Code Class 2 and 3 valves shall meet the stress limits specified in Code Paragraphs NC-3522 and ND-3522, respectively, for the service limit loading specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(h)(3), this Section.

(3) Service limit loading is as follows:

Design and Loading Service Limit Combinations Level A PD+DW+NO+OL Level B PO+DW+NO+OL+DE Level C PO+DW+NO+OL Level D PO+DW+NO+OL+DDE PD - Design Pressure PO - Operating Pressure DE - Design Earthquake (50% of DDE)

DDE - Double Design Earthquake (mcludes Hosgri fault requirements). Loading as specified in Paragraph 2.1.5(c), this Section.

DW - Deadweight NO - Nozzle/Piping Loads OL - Operating Loads (includes maximum allowable valve actuator thrust) 8179, Rev2N (i) Supplier's Design/Seismic Analysis Report and Certificate of Compliance.

(I) In accordance with the Code requirements of Subsection NCA, NCA-335 1.1, Supplier shall prepare and furnish for Engineer's approval a "Design/Seismic Analysis Report" for each Code Class valve or assembly. The Design/Seismic Analysis Report for all valve sizes shall be certified and dated by a Registered Professional Engineer for each Code Class valve and assembly.

(2) Thermal transients necessary for veriying Code Class I valve adequacy for cyclic loading shall be in accordance with PG&E Vendor documents 663219-644 (2" and Smaller Manual Valves);

663219-646 (2-1/2I and Larger Motor Operated Valves) and 6962 15-1 (Solenoid Operated Globe and Throttle Valves). The valve locations with the applicable transients will be provided with the Purchase Order.

(3) The supplier shall not furnish Design/Seismic Analysis Reports for valves identical to those procured on previous Purchase Orders.

However, the supplier shall furnish certification by a Registered Professional Engineer certifying that the valves procured on the specific current Purchase Order (state the P.O. number) are identical to the valves furnished and qualified by existing Buyer approved Design/Seismic Analysis Report (identify Report by number, revision and date and Buyer's document control record number).

2.1.6 Installation

Each valve shall be designed, whenever possible, for installation in any position. Installation position restrictions shall be given by Bidder in Proposal and permanently indicated by the manufacturer on the valve body.

2.1.6 Flow Direction: Each valve shall be designed, whenever applicable, for bi-directional flow. Flow direction restrictions shall be given by Bidder in Proposal and be permanently indicated by the manufacturer on the valve body (i.e. cast-on arrow).

2.1.7 Boundaries

The valve boundary is defined to be the piping connection at the first circumferential welded joint or the face of the first flange in bolted connections.

8179, Rev 2N 2.2 GENERAL PHYSICAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 2.2.1 Dimensions and thickness: Whenever applicable, valve dimensions and tolerances, including wall thickness shall be in accordance with the requirements of ANSI B 16.34, Paragraph 6, unless otherwise specified.

2.2.2 Stem or Shaft Sealing: The Supplier upon completion of the hydrotest shall remove all packing material, clean and dry the stuffing box or packing containment area and shall provide the valve or assembly without ay packing. Packing will be installed at the site by PG&E.

2.2.3 Stuffing Box: When specified in the Valve Data Sheet, the valve shall have a stuffing box designed to accommodate a double set of packing rings separated by a lantern ring to provide an interspace leak-off chamber. The leak-off chamber shall include a provision for drain piping.

2.2.4 Stem or Shaft Leak-Off Piping: The leak-off chamber of each valve referred to in Paragraph 2.2.3, this Section, shall be equipped with a 1/2 inch nominal pipe size, seamless, schedule 160, 6 inch long nipple, one end welded to valve and the other closed with a welded cap. Pipe nipple and cap material shall be of the same "P-Number" as the valve material. See ASME Section IX, Article IV, QW-420 for "P-Numbers.

2.2.5 Valve Body Styles: Valve body styles and patterns (i.e. long, short, straight, wye, butt welding ends, flanged, wafer, etc.) shall be as specified in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order.

(a) Butt-welding end preparations of 2-1/2 inch nominal size and larger butt weld end valves shall comply with the requirements of ANSI B 16.25 for field welding without backing rings.

(b) Socket weld end dimensions for 2 inch nominal size and smaller socket weld end valves shall be in accordance with the Code and ANSI B 16.34.

(c) Flanges of flanged end valves shall comply with the requirements of ANSI B 16.34, Paragraphs 2.1 and 2.4. All flanged end valves shall be furnished with raised face flanges, unless otherwise specified in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order.

(d) Globe type control valves shall be cage type unless otherwise specified.

2.2.6 Large Valve Bonnets or Covers: As applicable, bonnets or covers of valves 2-1/2 inch nominal size and larger whose rating or standard "Class Rating" (see 8 179, Rev 2N Paragraph 2.1.2, this Section) is, or is higher than ANSIB 16.34 Class 600, shall be of the pressure seal (or breach lock) type. Bonnets and covers of valves of lesser rating shall be ofthe bolted onto body type.

2.2.7 Small Valve Bonnets or Covers: As applicable, bonnets or covers of valves 2 inch nominal size and smaller may be of either the bolted, welded, threaded and seal welded, or pressure seal (or breach lock) type. Bonnetless valves are also acceptable. Union type bonnets are not allowed.

2.2.8 Valves shall be provided with disc position indication when specified in the P.O.

2.2.9 Butterfly and Diaphragm valves shall be provided with an adjustable travel stop device to prevent disc over-travel. Disc position indication is also required.

2.2.10 Valve Manual Operators: Each valve to be supplied shall be equipped with a manual operator. The manual operator shall be either a handwheel, a wrench, or a tee handle. Manual operators requiring more than 80 pounds of coupled operating effort at rim ofhandwheel or ends of tee handle or 60 pounds of operating effort at end of wrench or handle to open or close the vale while operating under design conditions referred to in Paragraph 2.1.2, this Section, shall be replaced with a gear assisted or an impact/gear assisted manual operator activated with either a handwheel, a crank or a chain drive if specified.

2.2.11 Valve Nameplates and Stamping: Each valve shall bear its manufacturer's Code symbol markings stamped on a nameplate in accordance with the requirements of the Code,Section III, SubArticle NCA-8200. Manufacturer's valve data and identification markings shall be impressed stamped or etched on another nameplate in accordance with the requirements of ANSI B16.34. Nameplate material shall be stainless steel. Low stress stamping may be used for marking on low stress areas of the valves provided the minimum wall thickness is not encroached. The Nameplate method of attachment shall not impair the structural integrity or functioning of the valve. Manufacturer's data and identification shall include the following as a minimum:

(a) Items required in ANSI B 16.34 (b) PG&E Purchase Order number and Item number (c) Valve tag number only if required by the Purchase Order 8179, Rev 2N SECTION 3 MATERIALS 3.1 MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS 3.1.1 Pressure Retaining Materials:

(a) Pressure Retaining Items: Pressure retaining items shall be as defined in the Code.

(b) Materials for Pressure Retaining Items: Materials shall be in accordance with the Code requirements.

3.1.2 Non-Pressure Retaining Materials:

(a) Non-pressure retaining materials shall have an ASTM Specification, unless otherwise approved by the Buyer's Engineer to be a non-ASTM material (i.e. non-safety, non-pressure boundary parts such as a handwheel or nameplate). The material type for non-ASTM parts shall be identified on the submitted valve drawing (e.g. carbon steel, stainless steel, brass, etc.).

3.1.3 Special Material Requirements and Tests (a) Austenitic Stainless Steel: Ferrite content of castings shall be 5 percent minimum (NX-2433.2) as determined by comparison of ladle or check analysis with the Schaeffler or DeLong diagram. Ferrite percentage shall be reported in the "Certified Material Test Report". Austenitic stainless steel material shall be provided in the solution annealed heat treated condition. During valve manufacturing, austenitic stainless steel shall not be heated over 350 degrees F, except for welding, or unless it has received a full solution annealing at the material supplier's recommended temperature and holding period. The annealing shall be followed by quenching below 800 degrees F within 4 minutes after removal from the heat treating oven, or otherwise cooled at a rate shown to be sufficient for a casting of similar size and section thickness to p'iiI testing requirements of ASTM A262 practices A or E. At time of removal from heat treating oven, material must be within the recommended solution heat treating temperature range. These requirements shall not apply to Non-Code, Non-Safety Related parts.

8179, Rev 2N Alternatively, the seat rings of 2" and smaller globe valves and the backseats of 2" and smaller gate valves may be installed by vacuum furnace brazing at 1950-2000 F folgowed by water quenching. This heat treatment is intended to provide good corrosion resistance in the valve body.

Cooling by means other than water quenching is acceptable only--when the cooling rate is sufficiently rapid to prevent sensitization. This determination shall be made in compliance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.44 by subjecting the material to a suitable intergranular corrosion test.

The valve body parts shall pass either practice A or E of ASTM A262.

This practice is not applicable to type 630 stainless steel.

(b) Impact Tests for Carbon Steel: These tests shall be as required by the Code. Impact tests shall be performed at 30 F or lower temperature (Lowest Service Metal Temperature). Test results shall be provided in the "Certified Material Test Reports".

(c) Galling and Seizing of Stainless Steel: Provisions to preclude galling or seizing of austenitic stainless steel material surfaces shall be implemented (e.g. bearing and moving contact surfaces).

(d) Age Hardening Stainless Steel: Use of these materials shall be limited to type 630 of either ASTM A564/ASME SA564 (bar stock), ASTM A707 (forgings), or ASTM A747/ASME SA747 type Cb7Cu-1. The type 630 materials shall be solution heat treated at 1900 +/-25 F for one hour per inch of thickness, not less than 1/2 hour, followed by air, nitrogen or liquid cooling. The type Cb7Cu-I materials shall be solution heat treated at 1925

+/-50 F for 1/2 hour per inch of thickness, not less than 1/2 hour, followed by air, nitrogen or liquid cooling. Both grades shall be age hardened at 1100 +/- 25 "F for four hours minimum followed by air cooling.

(e) Surface Finish: The finish of pressure boundary items and hardfaced or hardened surfaces of seats and discs shall be such as to permit satisfactory performance and interpretation of the nondestructive examination specified herein.

8179, Rev 2N (f) Hardfacing: Non-cobalt hardfacing materials (NiCr-A, B or C) in accordance with AWS/SFA 5.13 classification shall always be used in radioactive services. However, for motor operated valves/valve parts, the use of non-cobalt hardfacing requires specific acceptance from the Buyer's Engineer. If non-cobalt hardfacing materials are unavailable, stellite hardfacing materials (E or RCoCr-A, B or C) may be used only when approved by the Buyer's Engineer. Mlfitary Specifications M1L-P-NiCr-B-2; or MiL-P-CoCr-E-I or other alternate non-stellite hardfacing materials such as Norem, Deloro or Colmonoy shall be used when specified in the request for Bid or Purchase Order.

(g) Materials for Borated Water Service: These materials (including bolting),

shall be austenitic stainless steel, type 316 or stainless steel per Paragraph 3.1.3(d) this Section.

(h) Valve Material Selection for Pressure Retaining Items: As applicable, pressure retaining item materials shall be as follows:

(1) Carbon Steel:

a) Forged - ASME SA-105 b) Cast - ASME SA-216 Grade WCB c) Plate - ASME SA-515 Grade 70 (2) Stainless Steel:

a) Forged - ASME SA-182 Grade F304/F316 or F304/316L when specified.

b) Cast - ASME SA-351 Grade CF8/CFSM or CF3/CF3M when specified. SA-35 1 - CF8C is permitted for driscs only.

c) Plate - ASME SA-240 Grade 316 or 316L when specified.

(i) Valve Stem, Shaft Materials, and Body to Bonnet Bolting: Valve stem, shaft materials and body to bonnet bolting shall be as specified in Paragraph 3.1.3(d), this Section, or equivalent material approved by Buyer's Engineer on the Supplier's drawings. SAIA-193, Grade B7 bolting is acceptable for carbon steel applications but is not permitted for use on stainless steel valves. Austenitic stainless steel type 316 bolting material may be used in 8 179. Rev 2N lieu of SA/A-564 Gr 630, cond HI 100 material for body to bonnet bolting only when approved by the Buyer's Engineer.

(I) Other Materials:

(1) Materials other than those specified by this Specification (swch as aluminum-bronze, cast iron, bronze, etc.) shall be furnished as specified in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order. The materials furnished shall be of ASME or ASTM material specifications.

(2) Cast iron yokes shall not be used for valves.

(3) Non-metallic items of the valves shall be as specified on the Buyer's Valve Data Sheet. These are selected by the Buyer for the temperature and radiation conditions based on valve location. In cases where the material is not specified, the Supplier shall select and furnish the material based on the design and environmental conditions specified in this Specification and/or Request for Bid or Purchase Order, and is subject to approval by the Buyer's Engineer.

(4) Nitriding or plating of the valve disc is not permitted.

8179. Rev 2N SECTION 4 VALVE ACTUATORS 4.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 4.1.1 Each motor or air operated valve shall be supplied complete with a "mounted-on" actuator. Actuator shall be of the kind and motion specified (Electric motor or pneumatic, linear, or rotary) and its attributes and performance shall be in accordance with the specific requirements given in this Section and the documents referred to in this paragraph. Actuator shall be designed to fully open and shut the respective valve under the maximum differential pressure at the speed specified in the specific Valve Data Sheet. If the actuator or externally mounted accessory is required to be seismically and/or environmentally qualified it will be designated as Seismic or Class IE on the Valve Data Sheet and shall be qualified in compliance with IEEE-323, IEEE 344, IEEE-382 and 10CFR50.49 as noted in this Section.

The specific attributes and performance for the valve actuators not covered by the Specification requirements will be specified in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order or the Valve Data Sheet.

4.1.2 Useful Life: Refer to Paragraph 2.1.4 for useful life of actuators. Buyer requires that each actuator (and its accessories) to be capable to perform not less than 2000 open to close, to open cycles during its useful life, with a maintenance frequency of not less than two years.

4.1.3 Seismic Qualification: Each electric motor actuator, pneumatic actuator and externally mounted accessory designated as Seismic or Class IE shall be seismically qualified by a prototype test in accordance with IEEE-344. The qualification test shall satisfy the seismic loading specified in Paragraph 2. 1.5(c).

4.1.4 Environmental Qualification: Each electric motor actuator and externally mounted accessory designated as Class IE shall be environmentally qualified by a prototype test in accordance with I0CFR50.49 for use inside or outside containment, as specified in the Valve Data Sheet or purchase order. The qualification test shall satisfy the environmental conditions specified in Paragraph 2.1.3(c). Manually operated valves do not require environmental qualification.

(a) When specified by the Purchase Order, qualified conduit entrance seals shall be supplied for Class IE electrical equipment. If environmental qualification testing of Class IE electric equipment was performed %ith conduit entrances sealed, the manufacturer shall describe in his proposal 8179, Rev 2N the method of sealing used. Additionally, a qualified conduit sealing fitting shall be quoted in the proposal.

(b) The qualification documents/reports shall indicate the differences in materials or configuration between the test specimen and the supplied actuator. A written justification for such differences shall be furnished for Buyer's review and approval.

4.1.5 Identification

Each actuator shall have a permanent noncorrosive manufacturer's identification and mechanical/electrical data plate securely attached to an easily accessible external surface of the enclosure. The plate shall indicate, as applicable, the following as a minimum: actuator type, motor type, model, serial number, voltage, current, horsepower, safe working pressure, Buyer's Purchase Order Number and valve (tag) number.

4.1.6 Selection

Complete responsibility to select, procure, mount, warrant and certify each valve actuator and its accessories shall rest solely with the valve Supplier.

Valve Supplier shall warrant and certify that each actuator is suitable for its valve, service conditions and qualifications.

4.1.7 Mounting

Mounting of each actuator on the respective valve shall be performed by the valve Supplier in their own facilities, or at their option, following Buyer's inspection and approval, by others, in their facilities. Mounting costs shall be included in quoted price of each assembly. Buyer will furnish to supplier, at time of or after award, the mounting position of the valve and actuator.

4.1.8 Installation

Each actuator to be supplied shall be designed for indoor installation, to function properly mounted in any position and to satisfy the service or design condition specified on the Valve Data Sheet. Actuators required for outdoor installation will be specified so on the Valve Data Sheet.

4.2 ELECTRIC MOTOR ACTUATORS 4.2.1 Mechanical Requirements:

(a) Electric Motor Actuators shall always be Limitorque and shall be sized by the valve manufacturer subject to review by PG&E. Sizing is to be in accordance with the requirements of NRC Generic Letter 89-10. Safety.

related Limitorque actuators shall be environmentally qualified in accordance with UIC Test Reports 600456 dated 12/9/75 and/or B0003 dated 6/7/76. Each actuator and externally mounted accessories designated as Class IE (Ref Paragraph 4.1.1, this Section) shall be of the same design as the prototype test actuator used to provide the basis for the 8179, Rev 2N seismic and environmental qualifications. Each actuator to be supplied shall be of the self-contained unit type and incorporate in its physical design the following mechanical features:

(1) A manual override with handwheel designed to be declutched automaticilly from the drive train when the motor is energized.

Return to manual operation shall require operation of a manual clutch control device. The manual override shall permit full opening or closing of the respective valve in a reasonable time.

Operating rim effort at maximum required torque shall not exceed 80 pounds. Rotation shall be clockwise to close. Functioning of the override shall not be prevented by failure ofthe motor or motor drive train. The handwheel shall be at rest any time the motor rotates.

(2) A mounting bracket capable of withstanding without damage any force that the actuator can apply upon it (i.e., stall torque with torque and limit switches disconnected, including seismic stresses).

(3) A lost motion "hammer-blow" action effective on both motor and manual operating modes.

(4) An oil-bathed or grease lubricated reduction gear train complete with thrust bearings.

(5) A stem nut that is field removable to permit repairs or replacement without disassembling the gear train, removing the actuator from the valve, or disconnecting any electrical wiring.

(6) Each actuator shall be designed to provide torque and position limitation in both directions.

(b) The Supplier shall furnish design calculations for the motor operated valves that define (a) the minimum thrust/torque required to open and close the valve against the design/maximum differential pressure. The minimum thrust/torque required shall be shown to envelope any hydrodynamic fluid effects expected during the stroking of the valve. This minimum thrust shall be calculated without considering any effects from the electrical coasting, and (b) the maximum opening and closing thrust/torque which the valve is capable to endure without overstressing the valve's weakest component at 90% of the component material yield strength. The limiting component (s) shall be identified.

8179, Rev 2N (c) The mechanical components of each actuator, except external appurtenances (handwheel, clutch-control device, etc.), shall be housed in a noncorrosive weatherproof and watertight enclosure. Each actuator designated as Class IE shall be equipped with vent(s) and drain(s) if the actuator was environmentally qualified with them. See the requirements of Paragraph 4.2.2(a)(6), this Section, if a combination of mechanical-electrical enclosure is supplied.

(d) Each actuator shall be safe to maintenance personnel, presenting no danger of accidental release of spring loads or other forces.

(e) Each actuator shall have a stroking speed complying with the requirements of the respective Valve Data Sheet. If the stroking speed is not specified, therein, the minimum rate shall be 30 seconds per 90 degrees rotation for rotary actuation and 12 inches/minute (gate valve) or 4 inches/minute (globe valve) for linear actuation at maximum differential pressure across the disc.

4.2.2 Electrical and Accessory Requirements (a) Motor and Electrical Accessory Requirements: Each actuator shall be equipped with a 3-phase main electric motor drive, and a terminal compartment. (Note: In special applications identified by the Valve Data Sheet, a direct current (DC) main drive motor may be required) Electrical components and requirements shall be in accordance with the following:

(1) Motor: The motor shall be specifically designed for valve actuator service and shall be high torque, totally enclosed, with motor leads brought into the terminal compartment.

(A) The motor shall be of sufficient size to open or. close the valve as specified in the Valve Data Sheet under the maximum differential pressure when voltage to motor terminals is at inrush conditions. The motor duty rating shall be sufficient to allow service for the minimum length of time required without exceeding its temperature rating. The motor shall be prelubricated and bearings shall be of the antifliction type.

(B) Supplier shall specify motor currents at the specified voltage for each actuator corresponding to locked rotor, maximum seating torque and average running load.

8179, Rev 2N (2) Power: Power to each actuator will be a single source of 460 volts with + 10% variation, 3 phase, 60 hertz unless otherwise specified in the Valve Data Sheet (i.e. DC drive motor). The control system will operate on 90-132 volt, single phase, 60 hertz AC or 90-140 Volt DC.

(3) Switches: Each actuator shall be controlled during valve opening and closing operation by devices (switches) adjustable in the field, which limit travel, thrust or torque to prevent damage to the valve.

Switches for actuators designated as Class IE shall be qualified with the actuator (Ref Paragraphs 4.1.3 and 4.1.4, this Section).

Torque and position limit switches shall be as follows:

(A) Torque Switches: Each actuator shall be equipped with adjustable torque switches, as necessary, wired to shut off the motor in the event that excessive torque is generated in either the opening or closing of the valve.

(B) Position Limit Switches: Each actuator shall be equipped with geared limit switches for open and close direction that are adjustable through the full range of the valve stroke.

Switches shall be wired to shut off the actuator at the set valve position limits and to control indicator lights. When required by the Purchase Order, each actuator shall have an externally mounted position switch provided at both or one end of the valve travel. Each switch is to have 2 NO and 2 NC contacts. The additional position switches shall be securely mounted either on the actuator, the actuator support, or the valve and shall be qualified if the actuator has been designated as Class IE (Ref. Paragraphs 4.1.3 and 4.1.4, this Section).

(C) Minimum rating of switches shall be as follows:

AC: 10 amp noninductive, 5 amp inductive at 120 volts DC: 5 amp resistive, 1.0 amp inductive at 125 volts The voltage drop across contacts shall be less than 1/4 volt at rated current.

(D) Switch Adjustment: Switches referred to in Paragraph 4.2.2(aX3), this Section, shall be adjusted by valve 8179, Rev 2N manufacturer after actuator is mounted on the respective valve.

(4) Position Transmitters: When specified, position transmitters shall be of the two wire type with 4 to 20 ma DC output, into a' maximum load of not less than 1,000 ohms, operating from a 48 volt DC supply. Overall accuracy shall be one half of one percent.

Position transmitters for actuators designated as Class IE shall be qualified (Ref. Paragraphs 4.1.3 and 4.1.4, this Section).

(5) Terminal Compartment: Each actuator shall be provided with a separate terminal compartment. Power and control wiring will be brought out to terminal blocks in this compartment for field connection. Terminal block ratings shall be suitable for the voltage and current requirements of the valve circuitry stated in Paragraph 4.2.2(aX2), this Section and qualified with the actuator (Ref.

Paragraph 4.1.3 and 4.1.4, this Section). Not less than three conduit entries shall be provided.

(A) Control and power terminals shall be screw or stud type capable of accepting ring tongue crimp type terminals.

(B) Identical actuators shall have identical external terminal numbering and wiring diagrams.

(6) Housing: The electrical components of each actuator shall be housed in a noncorrosive weatherproof enclosure conforming to NEMA ICS 6-110, Type 4, as a minimum.

4.3 PNEUMATIC ACTUATORS 4.3.1 Mechanical Requirements:

(a) Each actuator designated as Seismic (Ref. Paragraph 4.1.1, this Section) shall be of the same design as the prototype test actuator used to provide the basis for the seismic qualification. Each actuator to be supplied shall be either a pneumatic single acting spring return diaphragm or a piston/cylinder type actuator, designed to be operated with clean, dry, oil free compressed air with maximum pressure of 100 psig. Piston/cylinder actuators shall be heavy duty types. Each actuator shall incorporate as applicable, in its physical design the following mechanical features:

8179, Rev 2N (1) A mounting bracket capable of withstanding without damage any force that the actuator can apply upon it.

(2) A fully closed weatherproof body with provisions made for venting, relieving of excessive pressure, lubrication of internals, and constant safety of personnel.

(3) A spring canister (for piston/cylinder type actuators) designed to fully enclose the return spring and allow its removal from actuator only when safe to personnel and equipment. Clearance between spring O.D. and canister wall I.D. shall not exceed W/2 inch throughout. Return spring shall be designed to assure a smooth, clatter-free operation. Piston/cylinder type actuators shall not be equipped with EPM, EPDM, or any other elastomeric "O-rings" or component which would swell in contact with oil or petroleum products.

(4) A shaft and shaft bearings designed and located to preclude bending of shaft.

(5) A provision to assure valve return to its required power failure position in the event of loss of air power.

(6) Provisions to prevent corrosion of internals (i.e. electroless nickel plating of all internal surfaces).

(7) A design safety factor of 4 to I for the pressure retaining components. If manufacturer's standard components do not satisfy this requirement, it shall be brought to the attention of the Buyer.

(8) A manual override that is capable of fully opening or closing its respective valve under maximum design conditions. The maximum torque required on handwheel rim to move the valve after seat clearing shall be 75 ft-lbs. Seating or unseating torque shall not exceed 150 ft-lbs. An impact type handwheel or a gear box shall be supplied if the torque requirement exceeds the latter.

(9) Actuators shall be equipped with travel stops to prevent valve or actuator overtravel.

(b) The Supplier shall furnish design calculations prepared to size the actuator to fully open, shut, and throttle its respective valve under the maximum design and service conditions given in the Valve Data Sheet. The minimum

-23 -

8179, Rev 2N thrust/torque required shall be shown to envelope any hydrodynamic fluid effects expected during the stroking of the valve. If tight shutoff is specified (ANSI/FCI 70-2-1991, Class IV or V) actuator shall provide a minimum seating force of 300 lbs per lineal inch of seat diameter in addition to pressure unbalance and friction forces.

(c) Each actuator shall have a stroking speed complying with the requirements of the respective Valve Data Sheet. If the stroking speed is not specified therein, its minimum rate shall be 30 seconds per 90" rotation for rotary actuation and 12 inches/minute (gate valve) or 4 inches/minute (globe valve) for linear actuation at maximum differential pressure across the disk.

(d) Rotary single acting piston/cylinder actuator torque requirements shal] be as follows:

(1) Pneumatic Stroke: Valve opening break-away torque (valve fully closed) shall not be less than 1.5 times the end torque (valve fully open) with a mid-travel position torque (valve half open) of not less than 70 percent of the end torque (valve filly open).

(2) Spring Return Stroke: Valve closing break-away torque (valve fully open) shall not be less than 1.5 times the end torque (valve fully closed) with a mid-travel position torque (valve half open) of not less than 70 percent of the end torque (valve filly closed).

(e) Linear single acting piston/cylinder actuator thrust requirements shall be as follows:

(1) Pneumatic Stroke: Valve opening break-away thrust (valve fully closed) shall not be less than 1.5 times the seating thrust, with air pressure at 80 psig.

(2) Spring Return Stroke: Valve closing break-away thrust (valve fully open) shall not be less than 1.5 times the seating thrust, with air pressure at 80 psig.

(f) Each actuator shall be safe to personnel, presenting no danger of accidental release of spring loads or other forces.

4.3.2 Electrical and Accessory Requirements:

(a) Each actuator shall be controlled during opening and closing operations by devices adjustable in the field, which limit travel speed, thrust, or torque.

8179, Rev 2N (b) When required by the Purchase Order, each actuator shall have externally mounted position switches provided at both or one end of the valve travel.

Refer to Paragraph 4.2.2(aX3), this Section for switch requirements.

(c) Unless otherwise indicated in the Valve Data Sheet, the electrical components of each actuator shall be housed in a noncorroding, weatherprooft and watertight enclosure conforming to NEMA ICS 6-110, Type 4, as a minimum.

(d) Control terminals shall be screw or stud type capable'of accepting ring tongue crimp type terminals.

(e) Identical actuators shall have identical terminal numbering, compressed air tubing diagrams and wiring diagrams.

(f) Solenoid valves shall be provided with the pneumatic actuators.

4.4 MATERIALS AND RESTRICTIONS 4.4.1 Unless otherwise specifed in Paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3, this Section, or in the Request for Bid or Purchase Order, actuator and accessory materials shall be per the manufacturer's requirements, subject to approval by Buyer's Engineer.

4.4.2 Threaded fasteners shall be made of 300 series stainless steel where practical.

Bolting for diaphragm actuators shall have a minimum tensile strength equal to SAE Grade 5. Where stainless steel fasteners are judged impractical, epoxy-painted alloy/carbon steel is acceptable. Cadmium plated fasteners are not allowed.

4.4.3 Aluminum materials are not allowed for use inside the containment.

8179, Rev 2N SECTION 5 QUALITY ASSURANCE 5.1 CLASSIFICATION OF PARTS:

5.1.1 General

The Supplier shall identify each material component or part of the valve and actuator that is an ASME Pressure Retaining Part or Non-ASME Safety Related Part. This identification shall be furnished on the Supplier's drawing for review and approval by the Buyer's Engineer. The approved drawing will be construed as acceptance and concurrence by the Buyer's Engineer of the quality classification. The Supplier shall conform to the qualify requirements specified in Paragraphs 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, this Section. The bids will be deemed unacceptable if the Supplier fails to conform with these requirements.

5.1.2 ASME Pressure Retaining Parts: The ASME pressure retaining parts of the valve shall be controlled by the Supplier's Quality Assurance Program approved by the Buyer to assure quality when supplying equipment or components in accordance with ASME B&PV Code, Section HI, Article NCA-4000 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B. The parts nomenclature used hereunder in Paragraphs 5.1.2(a),

5.1.3(a) and 5.1.4 may reflect those shown in Code Case N-62.

(a) ASME Pressure Retaining Parts: The ASME Pressure Retaining parts include but are not limited to the following for the valve types specified:

(1) GATE and GLOBE/CONTROL: Body, Bonnet, Gate/Disc/Wedge/Plug, Pressure Seal Gasket Retaining Ring, Body/Bonnet Bolting, Lifting Lug (if permanent attachment to pressure retaining part), Drain Nipple/Cap/Plug.

(2) CHECK: Body, Bonnet Cover/Cap, Bonnet Retainer, Disc, Pressure Seal Gasket Retaining Ring, Body/Bonnet Bolting, Lifting Lug (if permanent attachment to pressure retaining part), Drain Nipple/Cap/Plug, Equalizer Piping.

(3) BALL: Body, Bonnet/Cover End Piece, Ball, Bearing Plate and Bolting, Body/Bonnet/Cover Bolting. Vent Plug.

8179. Rev 2N (4) DIAPHRAGM: Body, Bonnet, Disk, Diaphragm (Code Case N-31), Vent Plug, Body/Bonnet Plate Bolting.

(5) BUTTERFLY: Body, Disc, Shaft Cover/Compression Plate &

Bolting Thrust Adjusting Screw.

5.1.3 Non-ASME Safety Related Parts: The safety related and critical materials, parts or components (non-pressure retaining items not covered by ASME Section III) essential to the function of the valve, shall be in compliance with the requirements of-Supplier's Quality Assurance Program for all activities affecting the quality of these items.

(a) Non-ASME, Safety Related Essential to Function Parts: The Non-ASME safety related essential to function parts include but are not limited to the following for the valve types specified.

(1) GATE AND GLOBE/CONTROL: Seat Ring, Backseat Ring, Disc Guide, Stem, Stem Collar/Clamp & Bolting, Disc/Stem Union, Yoke & Yoke/Bonnet Bolting Cage, Cage Spacer, Upper/aLower Wedge & Retainer (for double-disc gates - excluding pressure retaining wedge), Packing Gland Flange & Bolting/Hinge Pin.

Packing Leakoff Pipe/Cap/Plug, Spring, Diaphragm, Spline Bushing Yoke Nut (only for "Active" electric & air operated valves), Yoke Bushing (only for Globe Valves).

(2) CHECK: Seat Ring, Hinge Arm, Hinge Shaft/Pin, Hinge Support (Bracket) Hinge Pin Cover & Bolting, Hinge and Hinge Pin Bushings, Disc Guide, Disc Nut, Disc Nut Locking Pin, Spring, Counterweight, Soft Seat and Seat Ring Retaining Screw.

(3) BALL: Stem, Trunion, Seat/Sleeve, Seat Spring, Liner, Packing Gland Flange & Bolting.

(4) DIAPHRAGM: Sten'Spindle, Compressor and Compressor Pin, Stem Nut/Bushing (only for "Active" electric and air operated valves), Diaphragm Finger Plate.

(5) BUTTERFLY: Disc Shaft, Disc Pin, Seat, Seat Retainer &

Bolting, Body Liner, Packing Gland Flange/Retainer & Bolting.

8179. Rev2N (b) Actuators and Accessories: Each Actuator (such as electric motor, pneumatic, linear or rotary) and externally mounted accessories (such as pressure regulator air sets, position/torque switches, position transmitters, terminal compartments) designated as Class IE (seismidcally and environmentally qualified) shall be controlled by the Supplier's Quality Assurance Program approved by the Buyer and 10 CFR 50, Appendi B.

5.1.4 All Other Parts: The following parts not covered by Quality Requirements of Paragraphs 5.1.2(a), 5.1.3(a) and 5.1.3(b), this Section, do not require any such identification on the Supplier's drawings. These parts for the specified valve types are:

(a) GATE AND GLOBE/CONTROL: Packing Gland Ring (when gland flange is a two piece item), Yoke Nut/Sleeve/Bushing/Cap, Pressure Seal Gasket Spacer Ring, Pressure Seal Bonnet Retainer/Lifting Plate &

Bolting, Wedge Spring (for double disc gate), Packing Lantern Ring, HandwheelHandle, Bushing/Bearing, Secondary Locking Device (washer, pin, locknut, set-screw, key), Name/ID Plate & Screw, Pressure Seal and Other Gaskets, Packing, Grease Fitting, Position Indicator & Bolting.

(b) CHECK: Pressure Seal Cover Retainer/Lifting Plate & Bolting, Pressure Seal Gasket Spacer Rings, Bushing, Packing, Gasket, Washer, NameID Plate.

(c) BALL: Stop Collar, Grease Fitting, Bearing/Bushing, Seat Spring Retainer/Cover, Seat Insert, Seal, O-Ring, Gasket, Packing, Handle, Lockwasher, Stem Nut.

(d) DIAPHRAGM: Spacer Nut, Spacer, Handwheel, Bearing, Stem Nuts/Bushing, Gasket, O-Ring, Washer, Locknut.

(e) BUTTERFLY: Disc Pin Washer, Thrust Spacer & Adjustment Bolting, Packing Gland Ring (when gland flange is a two piece item),

Bearing/Bushing, Packing, Gasket, O-Ring.

5.1.5 APPLICABILITY OF IOCFR2 1: The requirements of I OCFR21 apply only to parts covered by Paragraphs 5.1.2(a), 5.1.3(a) and 5.1.3(b), this Section.

5.1.6 DETERMINATION OF OTHER PART CLASSIFICATIONS (FOR PARTS NOT COVERED IN THIS SECTION). If the above lists do not cover a specific part used in the Supplier valve design, then the Supplier will classify the part during the quotation process and obtain concurrence from Buyer's Engineer.

8179, Rev 2N SECTION 6 WELDING 6.1 GENERAL 6.1.1 Whenever required in the manufacturing of the valves to be supplied under this specification, welding and welding related items (i.e. processes, procedures, welder and procedure qualifications, heat treatment, etc.) shall be in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section IX.

6.1.2 Welding, welding filler metal handling and heat treatment procedures for all pressure retaining, hardfacing, repair and other critical welds are not required to be submitted to the Buyer's Engineer for approval prior to their implementation. The Supplier shall be completely responsible for performing welding in compliance with the requirements of the ASME Code and this specification.

6.2 WELDING PROCESSES 6.2.1 The following welding processes are acceptable to PG&E in the manufacturing of valves:

(a) Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW)

(b) Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW)

(c) Submerged Arc Welding (SAW)

(d) Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW)

(e) Flux Cored Arc Welding (FCAW)

(f) Oxy-Acetylene Welding (OAW) 6.3 WELDING ELECTRODES (FILLER METAL) 6.3.1 Low hydrogen type electrodes shall be used in the SNLANV process.

6.3.2 Electrode classifications E6012, E6013, E7014 and E7024 shall not be used in the welding of pressure retaining items. They may however be used in the fillet welding of non-pressure retaining items.

8179, Rev 2N 6.3.3 Electrodes shall conform to ASME SFA-5. 18, classifications E70S-2, E70S-3 or E70S-6 for GMAW.

6.3.4 Electrodes shag conform to ASME SFA-5.20, classifications E70T-I or E70T-5 for FCAW which shall be done with an external shielding gas.

6.3.5 Electrode deposit chemical composition and mechanical properties shall be within the limits specified for the materials to be joined.

6.3.6 The acceptable Delta Ferrite content limits of austenitic stainless steel welds shall be 5 percent as a minimum (NX-2433.2). These limits shall be managed through the control of the filler metal at procurement time, using the Schaeffier diagram to estimate the percentage of ferrite. The results of the delta ferrite determination shall be included in the Certified Material Test Reports of NX-2130 or NX-4.120.

6.4 MISCELLANEOUS WELDING REQUIREMENTS 6.4.1 The root pass of each fill penetration butt weld shall be performed by the GTAW process only, unless the reverse side of the weld is accessible for cleaning, repair, and examination to accomplish a sound, uniform and full penetration weld. Back welding may be required after grinding back side of root pass to accomplish a full penetration weld.

6.4.2 Permanent backing rings or strips are not allowed.

6.4.3 Filler metal layer thickness of SAW process welds shall not exceed the following dimensions.

(a) 1/2 inch, when welding carbon or low alloy steel items of 1-1/4 inch or more thickness.

(b) 3/8 inch, when welding carbon or low alloy steel items of less than 1-1/4 inch thickness.

(c) 1/4 inch, when welding austenitic stainless steel items regardless of thickness.

6.4.4 Alloy wire and neutral flux shall be used in SAW process of alloy and austenitic stainless steel.

6.4.5 Removable starting and stopping tabs shall be used in longitudinal SAW process.

6.4.6 Peening is not allowed.

8179, Rev 2N 6.4.7 Internal inert gas purging shall be used in the GTAW process of the root pass of austenitic stainless steel. Nitrogen shall not be used as a purging gas.

6.4.8 Each pass of a circumferential weld shall be fully completed around the joint before performing the next pass. Block welding technique is not allowed.

6.4.9 Heat shall not be applied to correct weld distortion and dimensional deviations of austenitic stainless steel.

6.4.10 OAW process for welding and hardfacing are not allowed on pressure retaining austenitic stainless steel, unless welded or hardfaced items are subsequently solution annealed.

6.5 HEAT TREATMENT OF WELDS AND WELDMENTS 6.5.1 Preheating Requirements: Preheating shall be in accordance with the Code and satisfy the following requirements:

(a) Carbon steel shall be preheated to 200 F minimum whenever the base material thickness exceeds 1-1/4 inch, or its carbon content exceeds 0.3 percent.

(b) Preheating and interpass temperature shall not exceed 350 F when welding or hardfacing pressure retaining austenitic stainless steel.

(c) Preheating requirements of Paragraphs 6.5.1(a) and 6.5.1(b), this Section, are applicable to flame and carbon-arc cutting, and tack welding but not to arc-air gouging.

(d) Preheating temperatures shall be measured using contact pyrometers or temperature indicating crayons which do not adversely affect the corrosion resistance of the material whenever used on stainless steel.

6.5.2 Postweld Heat Treatment: Postweld heat treatment shall be in accordance with the Code and satisfy the following requirements:

8179, Rev 2N (a) Postweld heat treatment temperatures shall be measured by attaching thermocouples directly to weldments or to metal heat sink items representing the largest section thickness of the weldment. When postweld heat treating is performed in batch type treatment, thermocouples shall be attached to weldments located in both top and bottom oven layers, or in the oven's hottest and coldest zones. Oven atmosphere temperature recordings are acceptable alternates. Records of calibration status shall be made available for review. The oven atmosphere temperature may be used to control metal temperature if based on a verification run showing a comparison between metal temperature obtained by thermocouples attached to the weldment(s) located in the hottest and coldest zones and the oven temperature. The temperature/time chart developed from this data may be used to control subsequent heat treating oven charges where the volume (tonnage) and/or maximum weldment thickness is equal to or is less than that of the verification run. A re-verification run shall be made approximately every 60 days or when a significant change has been made to the oven.

8179, Rev2N SECTION 7 NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION, TESTS, WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS AND INSPECTION 7.1 NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION 7.1.1 GENERAL (a) Valves to be supplied under this Specification shall be nondestructively examined in accordance with the requirements of the Code and the additional requirements of this Section.

(b) Supplier's nondestructive examination facilities shall be subject to inspection and approval by the Buyer. The typical nondestructive examinations required for the valves are descnrbed in Paragraphs 7.1.2 through 7.1.5, this Section.

(c) Procedures concerning the nondestructive examination and hydrostatic/seat leakage testing of the valves are not required to be submitted to the Buyer for approval prior to their implementation. However, the Supplier shall be completely responsible for compliance with the requirements of the Code and this Specification, and shall submit calculations and procedures as specified in Paragraph 1.3.6.

(d) As applicable, and in addition to the Code requirements, the following examinations shall be performed on the valves:

(1) Nuclear Class I and 2 valves manufactured to ANSI B 16.34 Special Class requirements shall be examined and repaired in accordance with ANSI B 16.34 requirements in accordance with the examination methods and acceptance standaids of NX-2500.

(2) For 4" and smaller Nuclear Class 1, 2, and 3 valves, hardfacing and base material adjacent to hardfaced areas shall be examined by the liquid penetrant method. The liquid penetrant examination shall be performed after machining and heat treatment.

7.1.2 Radiographic Examination (a) The radiographic examination procedures and acceptance standards shall satisfy the Code requirements.

8179, Rev 2N 7.1.3 Magnetic Particle Examination (a) In addition to the Code requirements the magnetic particle examination procedures and acceptance standards shall satisfy the following conditions:

(1) Magnetic particle examinations shall be made with the prod, coil or direct contact method using direct or rectified alternating current.

The yoke method may only be used in the supplementary surface examination of arc strikes and machined surfaces.

(2) "As Cast" surfaces may be examined by the wet.or dry method.

7.1.4 Liquid Penetrant Examination (a) In addition to the Code requirements the liquid penetrant examination procedures and acceptance standards shall satisfy the following conditions:

(1) Liquid penetrant examination of machined and welded surfaces shall be made with the solvent removable method or the water washable method.

(2) Liquid penetrant examination of cast and un-machined surfaces may be made with the water washable method or the post imulsification method.

(3) Materials used for liquid penetrant examination of austenitic stainless steel shall be of the low (200 ppm maximum) sulfur and halogen type, approved by the Buyer's Engineer.

7.1.5 Ultrasonic Examination (a) Ultrasonic examination procedures and acceptance standards shall be in accordance with the Code.

7.1.6 Examination Personnel Qualification (a) Material and valve nondestructive examinations shall be performed by personnel qualified in accordance with the requirements of the Code and SNT-TC-IA.

-34 -

8179, Rev 2N 7.2 TESTS 7.2.1 General (a) Valves to be supplied under this Specification shall be tested in accordance with the requirements of the Code and additionally with those of Paragraph 7.2.2, this Section.

(b) Actuators to be supplied under this specification (e.g. assemblies) shall be tested in accordance with the requirements of Paragraphs 7.2.3 and 7.2.4, this Section.

(c) Supplier shall perform tests in their own facilities as required by the Code and this Specification. Supplier's test facilities shall be subject to prior inspection and approval by the Buyer.

(d) Supplier shall repair or replace, at their own expense, any item directly or indirectly damaged by the tests.

7.2.2 Valve Tests (a) Prior to testing, valves shall be thoroughly cleaned internally and externally, leaving them free of oil, grease, scale, rust, chips, organic matter and other potentially harmful or detrimental materials, debris, etc.

(b) Valve seat leakage (closure test) shall not exceed 2 cc/hr/inch of nominal valve size, or as specified on the Valve Data Sheet.

(c) Seat closure test duration shall not be less than 4 minutes.

(d) Seat closure test pressure for electrically or pneumatically actuated globe valves shall be made at a pressure equal to 110 percent of the operator differential pressure stated in the Valve Data Sheets. The seat closure test of all other power actuated and manual valves shall be performed at a test pressure equal to 110 percent of the body rating at 100'F.

(e) When the Valve Data Sheet specifies the valve to be a "Containment Isolation Valve", an additional seat leakage test using air at 50 psig shall be required. Pressure shall be applied in the same direction as that when the valve would be required to perform its safety function. Leakage shall not exceed 40 SCCM/inch of nominal valve size. Test duration shal not be less than 4 minutes.

8179, Rev 2N 7.2.3 Operational Tests (a) Following the testing of the respective valve, each manual valve shall be given an operational test consisting of three complete valve operating cycles (from fully open, to fMry closed, to fully open).

7.2.4 Functional Tests (a) Electric motor and pneumatically operated active valves require functional testing.

(b) Active valves will be designated on the Valve Data Sheets included with the Bid Request or Purchase Order accompanying this Specification.

(c) Operability of active valves, during a postulated dynamic occurrence, shall be verified by testing. Test data acquired for a qualified valve may be used to qualify valves of the same type that fall within the range of sizes permitted by Figure 5, Attachment 2, provided geometric similarity is maintained and supporting stress calculations are provided. If the qualified valve is larger than 36 inch nominal size, extrapolation may be made to valves whose nominal size does not vary more than 25 percent from that of the qualified valves. Testing required by this Section is considered to be

.supplement to any test/analysis used to qualify valves per Paragraph 2.1.5.

(d) Except when an alternative testing procedure has been approved in accordance with Paragraph 7.2.4(e), this Section, an active valve shall be tested as follows:

(1) Valve shall be placed in a suitable test stand. It shall be supported in a manner typical of the actual installation, With the topworks mounted as in normal plant operation.

(2) The valve shall be internally pressurized to the maximum operating differential pressure, as specified in the Valve Data Sheet. A static load shall be applied concurrently in accordance with Paragraphs 2.1.5(cX2) and 2.1.5(cX3).

(3) The valve shall be actuated using the proposed valve actuator plant minimum actuation supply as defined in the Valve Data Sheet.

Reference Paragraphs 4.2.2(a)(1) and 4.3. 1.

(4) Valve must cycle open to close to open within its required operating time limits if defined on the Valve Data Sheet or per 8 179. Rev 2N standard speed specified in Paragraphs 4.3. 1(c) for pneumatic actuators or 4.2.1(e) for motor actuators.

(5) Valve stroking shall commence from the identical position (i.e.

open or closed) as in the actual installation, and at least two full cycles shal be performed.

(e) I~f the Supplier proposes to demonstrate the operability of active valves by procedures different from those described in Paragraph 7.2.4(d), this Section, it shall submit to Buyer's Engineer for approval a detailed description of his proposed procedure.

(f) After completion of the valve functional test, the seat leakage test, as outlined in Paragraph 7.2.2, this Section, shall be repeated.

(g) Supplier shall submit its proposed functional testing procedure and method of analysis to Buyer's Engineer for approval (Re Paragraph 1.3.6).

(h) Valve stresses associated with the functional test shall be shown by calculations to be within the allowable stress limits specified in Paragraph

2. 1.5(h).

7.2.5 Test data and other required records shall be submitted prior to or along with the valve shipment in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 10.2.

7.2.6 Seismic and Environmental Tests (a) Refer to Paragraphs 2.1.3 and 2. 1.5 for seismic and environmental testing of actuator and externally mounted accessories designated as Class IE.

7.3 WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS 7.3.1 Measurements of body wall and neck thickness shall be performed by manufacturer on each valve to be supplied. Measurements shall be made in accordance iAith the requirements of the Code. As applicable, the following minimum measurements shall be taken:

(a) Scan the entire body wall thickness on body inlet and outlet, near the neck, the weld ends or end flanges and record the minimum measurement.

(b) Scan the body neck thickness at the thinnest configuration and record the minimum measurement.

8179, Rev 2N (c) Scan the bonnet wall or cover thickness at the thinnest configuration and record the minimum measurement.

(d) Scan the entire flange thickness of bonnet and body flanges and record the minimum measurement.

7.3.2 Unless coinciding with the measurement points specified in Paragraph 7.3. 1, this Section, thickness measurements shall also be taken at suspect locations (i.e.

indentations, voids, etc.) and at repaired areas.

7.4 IN~SPECTION 7.4.1 Valves and/or assemblies to be supplied under this Specification are subject to inspection and test witness by the Buyer's Inspector during and after manufacturing and prior to shipment. For specific cases, when approved by the Buyer's Engineer, the inspection and test witness may be waived by the Purchase Order. PG&E will notifyr supplier. of the tests that are required. to be witnessed by PG&E's Inspector.

7.4.2 Supplier shall notify' PG&E of testing and dimensional inspection being performed so that arrangements can be made to have Buyer's Inspector present to witness the test and examination. Whether or not Buyer's Inspector is present at time of testing/examination, the certificates of shop tests, examination and required documentation shall be furnished in accordance with the requirements of the Code and this Specification.

7.4.3 Buyer's Inspector-may request notification from Supplier for intermediate inspections of fabricated work. A final inspection will be made by Buyer's Inspector before each assembly is shipped and none shall be shipped from Supplier's shop without specific release by the Buyer's Inspector.

7.4.4 Electric actuator motors shall be subject to inspection and tests, to be witnessed at the motor manufacturer's facilities, unless waived by the Purchase Order. The same access and prior notification of tests referred to in Paragraph 7.4.3, this Section, shall be given for the actuator motors. Releases shall be subject to approval by the Buyer's Inspector.

8179, Rev 2N SECTION 8 SHOP CLEANING AND PAINTING 8.1 SHOP CLEANING 8.1.1 Cleaning procedures are not subject to approval by the Buyer's Engineer prior to their implementation.

8.1.2 Valves shall be thoroughly dried after testing and thoroughly cleaned internally and externally before shipping to remove oil, grease, scale, and foreign materials.

8.1.3 Cleaning agents and processes shall not injure finishes, surfaces, or metallurgical properties. Cleaning agents and rinses with demineralized water having more than I PPM of chlorides are not allowed for stainless steel parts. Brush cleaning of stainless steel shall be done with stainless steel brushes which have not been previously used on any other material.

8.2 SHOP PAINTING 8.2.1 The external surfaces of each ferritic steel valve shall be protected with a heat resistant inorganic zinc silicate primer coating applied in the shop in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations to a minimum dry film thickness of 0.003 inches.

(a) Surface preparation shall be in accordance with SSPC-SP-10.

(b) The following is an approved commercial reference for inorganic zinc silicate primer for external surfaces:

Carboline Protective Coatings: Carbo Zinc I1 Parkerizing (Zinc Phosphate Coating)

(c) Coating of butt weld end valves shall terminate 1/2 to 3/4 inch away from the weld end preparations.

(d) Weld end preparations shall be cleaned and coated with a corrosion inhibitor. Special Chemical Corporations Deoxaluminate is an approved commercial reference.

8.2.2 External surfaces of stainless steel valves shall not be prepared nor primer coated.

8 179, Rev 2N SECTION 9 TAGGING AND SHIPMENT PREPARATION 9.1 GENERAL 9.1.1 Tagging and shipment preparation of valves and/or assemblies to be fifrnished under this Specification are subject to review, inspection and shipping approval by the Buyer's Inspector, unless the inspection requirements are waived by the Purchase Order (Re Paragraph 7.4). Tagging and shipment procedure is not subject to approval by the Buyer's Engineer prior to implementation.

9.2 SHIPING 9.2.1 In addition to the requirements of the Code, each valve actuator and accessories shall be tagged before shipping with a stamped metal identification plate mechanically fastened by wire or adequately secured, bearing, as applicable, the following information. Low stress stamps may be used on low stress areas of the valve for heat, serial and RT location numbers.

(a) Valve or instrument number (tag number) only if required by the Purchase Order.

(b) Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Number (c) Valve manufacturer's name, nominal valve size, service and model number.

(d) Actuator and accessory manufacturer's name and model number.

(e) Buyer's Purchase Order.

9.3 SHIPMENT PREPARATION 9.3.1 Valves and/or assemblies shall be thoroughly protected against damage or corrosion during shipping and storage.

9.3.2 Valve openings shall be closed with protective resilient material caps tightly sealed with weatherproof pressure sensitive, chloride free, plastic tape to assure the integrity of the valves in handling, shipping, and storage (including butt weld ends, flange facings. etc.).

8179, Rev 2N 9.3.3 Air tubing and electrical openings of actuators shall be securely sealed and protected with resilient material plugs to guard against damage in handling, shipping, and storage.

9.3.4 To protect valves against moisture and corrosion damage during shipping and storage, a desiccant shall be placed in the body of each 2-1/2" and larger carbon steel valve and a metal tag externally attached to the valve shall indicate its type, quantity, trade name, normal effective life, and date the desiccant was placed in the valve. Desiccant shall be harmless to valves and/or assemblies. Valves 2" and smaller shall be packed/placed in plastic bags with a desiccant in such a way that the valve internals are protected and a metal tag as specified above shall be attached.

9.3.5 Valves and/or assemblies shall be individually shipped in sturdy containers (crazes or boxes) or under other types of protective coverings (lumber or metal structures) so as to preclude damage or contamination. Valves 2" and smaller may be shipped in a multi-valve container provided they are packed so as to preclude damage or contamination. Weatherproof exterior identification dearly indicating Diablo Canyon Site name, valve size and service of each assembly therein and Buyer's Purchase Order Number shall be attached to each container.

9.3.6 Each butterfly valve shall be shipped with its disc sufficiently open to avoid circumferential seat contact. Disc shall be blocked with resilient material harmless to valve.

9.3.7 Valves shall be shipped without any stem packing. Packing will be installed at the site by PG&E (Ref. Paragraph 2.2.2). Packing gla.nd flanges/bolting and the -alve stem shall be protected to preclude damage during shipment.

8179, Rev 2N SECTION 10 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 10.1 GENERAL 10.1.1 Each valve to be supplied under this Specification shall comply with the quality assurance record keeping requirements of the Code and of those referred to herein.

10.1.2 To substantiate compliance with the quality assurance required in each valve design, material procurement, manufacturing, examination, testing, etc., Supplier shall forward at time of shipping to Diablo Canyon Site the entire documentation (i.e. certificates, charts, test reports, data, etc.) requested in this Specification or implied herein.

10.2 REQUIRED RECORDS 10.2.1 Supplier shall provide for the pressure retaining items of each valve the following records, as a minimum:

(a) Code Data Report and Certificate of Compliance to this Specification.

(b) Certified material test reports (CMTR) for the valve pressure retaining material and welding electrodes. As applicable, each CMTR shall include impact test results and ferrite content of materials.

(c) Heat treatment temperature time charts. In special cases, where the charts do not reproduce legibly, a record of the data shall be provided with the charts. In lieu of the actual heat treatment temperature/time charts, the Supplier may instead provide a certified listing of the recorded data from the original heat treatment temperature/time charts. These heat treatment charts shall pertain to the Post Weld Heat Treatment performed subsequent to the weld repair work done at the Supplier's facilities and do not apply to the PWHT of forgings and castings required by the Material Specification.

(d) Fabrication and/or repair welding records. Records shall also include heat and/or lot number(s) of the welding electrodes used.

8 179, Rev 2N (e) Nondestructive examination records including radiographic films.

(f) Hydrostatic (shell pressure) test results.

(g) Seat leakage (closure) test results.

(h) Functional test results.

(i) Wall thickness measurement records.

(j) Certified motor test reports, as applicable.

8179, Rev 2N SECTION II REFERENCED CODES AND STANDARDS 11.1 The following is a listing of the codes, standards, and the references mentioned in this specification. The effective date of each referenced document shall match or be that in effect at the time of but not later than, the effective date of the 1989 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, except that for IEEE Standards, for which the date is specified in Paragraph 11.1.5, this Section. The use of NRC approved code editions and addenda by the supplier/manufacturer prior to or subsequent to 1989 edition shall be subject to prior approval by the Buyer.

11.1. 1 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section Il--Material Specifications, Part A, B and C Section Ifi-Subsection NCA-Generai Requirements for Divisions I and 2 Section III--Division I Subsection NB - Class I Components Subsection NC - Class 2 Components Subsection ND - Class 3 Components Section V--Nondestructive Examination Section IX--Welding and Brazing Qualifications 11.1.2 ANSI American National Standards Institute B 16.5 Steel Pipe Flanges, Flanged Valves and Fittings B16.10 Face to Face and End to End Dimensions of Ferrous Valves B 16.11 Standard for Forged Steel Fittings, Socket Welding and Thareaded B16.25 Standard for Butt-Welding Ends B 16.34 Standard for Steel Valves, Flanged and Butt-Welding Ends 11.1.3 ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials A262 Practice for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austeritic Stainless Steels A564 Specification for Hot-Rolled and Cold-Finished Age-Hardenirng Stainless Steel and Heat-Resisting Steel Bars and Shapes 8179. Rev 2N E94 Standard Practice for Radiographic Testing 11.1.4 AWS American Welding Society, Inc.

A5. 13 Specification for Solid Surfacing Welding Rods and Electrodes 11.1.5 IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 323-1974 Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations 344-1975 Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations 382-1980 Qualification of Safety-Related Actuators 11.1.6 NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association ICS6 Enclosures for Industrial Controls and Systems MGI Motors and Generators 11.1.7 SSPC Steel Structures Painting Council SP-10 Near-White Blast Cleaning 11.l.8 IOCFRSO Code of Federal Regulations

& I OCFR21 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 DATA SHEETS FURNISHING AND DELIVERING MANUALLY, ELECTRIC MOTOR AND PNEUMATICALLY OPERATED VALVES COMPLYING WITH THE ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE SECTION III, DIVISION 1, CLASS 1, 2 AND 3 (PG&E DESIGN CLASS 1)

FOR NUCLEAR SERVICE AT UNITS 1 AND 2, DIABLO CANYON SITE Y:%DfWJP96M3lH.DOC

MANUAL VALVE DATA SI JT 8179 VALVE DESCRIPTION VALVE NUMBER TYPE NOMINAL SIZE RATING _ ITEM NUMBER END CONNECTION COMMERCIAL REFERENCES PARTS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS BODY BONNET/COVER WEDGE/DISC SEAT STEM BALL/PLUG/DL'PHRAGM YOKE BONNET/COVER GASKET BUSHING(S)

PACKING/SEAL(S)

PIN(S)/SCREW(S)

SPRING(S)

OPERATOR I MANUAL TYPE(S) ONLY REMARKS I

1. Packing Leak-off piping connection required: Yes No.

2. Valve Location: Inside Containment Outside Containment REV.

3. Containment Isolation Valve: Yes No PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - DATA SHEET

VALVE ASSEMBLY DATA SHE'7 8179 Il ITEM NO Plant/Unit IEMM No.

Tag Record No. Shl. No.

Service File No. Spec. No.

Engineer P.O. No.

w5ij 7, Press FlOw r NOTES:

FLUID SIZING CONDITIONS 0 -Ii Units Min cap. Nor cap. Max cap. 1 Flow Rate__ ____

• Packing Leak-off 0o Inlet Pressure Outlet Pressure 7_ connection required:

Yesk N..__.N z

0 Temperature 2 0 Superheat 2 valve V Location:

Specific Gravity Inside Containment.-

w Req'd Cap Coeff Outside Containment UJ Rated Cap Coeff Shut Off Pressure 3,SActuator/Accessory to Recovery Coeff Designated Class 1E Oine Size Inlet Outlet (Ref Para. 4.1.3, 4.1.4)

Pipe Schedule Inlet Outlet Yes - No Noise Level (O5A) I < 05 1 Ii Manufacturer _4 . Active Valve Model __ _ __ _ (Ref Para. 7.2.4)

Type Size Yes No on [ 150 06000 1500 O ANSI CLASS RATING 0 300 Q 900 0 2500

[ Scrd F WNV 5.RFFiActuator/Accessory Designated Seismic CONNECTION TYPE OWafer [iB/W 0 Body Material Jlacking material (Ref Para 4.1.1. 4.1.3) i Ball -u Plug Yes._ No I E Disc .--.

< UShaft 0I-' 6. Containment Isolation Valve i Stem Yes No r- b0 Seat 0 Liner 0Seal []

-ICage C]3

- Bushing Size rPortBalanced Unbalanced Flow to: El Open ] Close Characteristics

• Equal % E:-Unear r' Open manufactrer IMOOel I *0 Tvye I. FOR MOTOR ACTUATED I.

Available Voltage I Pressure VALVES. THE "MOTOR Failure Mode tjl FO ) FC ;- As Is OPERATED VALVE DATA a: Handwheel Req'd 0 Yes 0 No SHEET', ATTACHED SHALL 0 ] 4-20 MA E 3-15 0PS ALSO BE PROVIDED 1-D Control Signal '10-50 mA C]

I- cc U

z0 Required? M- Yes El No Action [] Direct C. Reverse Characteristic Equal % [- Unear Z o7`pen 0 Accessories F-Bypass fiGauges Z Airset I C. I 1~

I.

Manufacturer IModel __No II Date -ale Revision BY IType Open Pos Close Pos -

r Contacts Reqd

,Cr_-

t(NO/NC-Normally open/dclosed) NO; N C; INO; ___:__

A I II W"

F"-.k -, I

[V. 7A, PV A LE 4 IN OF4~t Py p - Pf", IT-10NP~OR:M A? I ~ ~4 A~I1f"1NC £ N ~bi VALVE ECUIPMENT 1.0. I OPCRATIOR AIPUTACTUrfR IMOTOR PNUFACTUNIf 2 ScRVICU/SYSTIm r.P..O Typt s Slit SERIAL NUMBE 3 MANUFACTURER VENDOR SHOPOMER NO. POWERSUPPLY 4AC/D* VOLTSI 4 TYPE 6 Slit SERIAL gup4(ft MAEDESIGH RUNNING CLAIRENT -AHRS

........... I LOCKED ROTORCUNMinT, Aws 5 ANSI RATING 14ANO1HEELCrAft RATIO RPHIRNMEPLA.tTE 6 MODEL NUMSER UNIT GEAR RATIO DUTY RATING STEM TYPE "90 GEARBOX RATIO INSULATION CLASS S IREVOLVINO/NCN-REVOLVING I ....... _I .... ROTARV VALVES Y*.,i ,

DIRECTION OF FLOW DESIGN SPEED OF OPERAlION SEC OFRAMESIZE (OVERfUnaCR SEArl STEM DIAMER (AT PACKING' IN. LIMIT SNITCH TYPE Ii OR 4 ROIOR LOS MOTOR NAMEPLATE TORGUE (AT THREADS/ IN. DMTMATERIAL) S IO THREAD P,_ REoUIID INl REOIRI.D LBS FmNc

• OW Os. 00.DOCUmINrs, SI TI IM Sl MAX.*AL t ' '

STEM NUT MATERIAL IRISING $STM) IMA.ALLOVASLI IELE) LBS P Ib I0 II COOROIMATESI 12 ' STROKE LENGTH PECAINICAL IN. SETTING TORO* IMININUM REOUIRID FT-LBS VENOOR DRAWINGS f.VALVE N_..

___________________ STS wINOT WIN MAX.ALtOWAR r IMANUALI FT-LOS P.*..

. .*\NUMBER (OPERATOR)

TONTACrOR, 9M_0 StC V RLOTIO IMIA.ALLOWAOSLE MCLC) L-BiStLECTRICAL. LAYOUT DRAWING 13 S"AT PORT DIAMETER IN STALLED THRUST LBS ELECTRICAL ELEMENTARY 14 DIAGRAM IT F'LUID

___U UAS

_____1__ _____CATE LEFT THRUST AT T(,AOUE SW TRIP SET-UP LBS ELECTRICAL BREAKER DATA SHEET It BREAKER IDENTIFICATION_

MAN. FLOW RATE \COSING) STALLED TOROUt FT-LBS PHYSICAL LOCATION 109.0 ELCEW.I APRESSU4RI OPENINGO .. .. PSI MAX.TIOPRU AVAIL. AT "HI. StuIPLY irT'-LBS IMAXIm4L)I \CLO-sj"S INFG VOLT.A"_ IUM)ORVOLTACE CONOIIIONI __A _____,__C___.___TP__

SYSTEM I4AX.PRESS.OURIIO VLV OPER PSI MINIMUM CALC*L.ATED HANDHOWIL TORIUC rT-LBS Is MINIMUMISUPPLY MAL.TEr4. DURIIG VLV OMER *F NECESSARY TO TRIP SWITCH I, ANk.T7NRUST VALVE CAN WITHSTAND OPEN LOS ........... R ITRO$1 ft"IM IN NOTED DIRECTION CLOSED LOS HAX.NAOONEL TOOUE-OSIN PT-LB SOI MAX.TOGOUE VALVE CAN WITHSTAND OPEN ILL" S-LBS OPERATOCALCLATIONS IN NOTED DIRECTION CLOSEO iiKLS5 SPRING PACK NUMER PACKION CALCULATION* S ___

MUMBItROfr PACKING ATHOS 21 SYSTEM PREfSSURnwE vFOR PACKING TOUE SWITCH SETTING LIMITER PSI PLATE REOUIIEO IYES/'OE 22 PACKING CHAMBER DIAMETER IN

• AS-INSTALLED' TONGUE SWI'lC OPEN N/,,,/ -

.,__________.....SETTING CLOSED 23 PACKING GLAND STUO SIZE IN LIMIT SWITCH C ROTOR I (IN I. TRAVEL TERMINATED

._ ___. __ _ SITTING-% Of ROTOR 2 CLOSED A-CLOSC OIRECTIOC... (IO...ORRTSL$I 24 HIM rT-LBS DISC NOVEMENY- ROTOR 3 B-OEN DIRECTION 41TS OR LS)

OLAND HUI TI__ __ MAX .F.e -gDESIGN ROTOR 4 12. ENVIRONMENTAL OUk.IFICATION ASSENOLT __ *YSOI I

HIH LOS NlT SWITCH ,7 ROTOR I OPEN 25 MAX LOS SETTING-% Or ROTOR 2 CLOSED

3. UNIT IS LIMITED BY_ NOT TO EXCEED - 1...,....LBS DISC MOVEMENT- PROTOR3 26 ACTUAL L ROTO" 4 GREIASE CRESE YPE TYPE OEAR SWITCHEts LIMIT OX_

27 __ ,_,

I m Poo. PYIPIRYCr ...........

04LY m

-- I. - I- P --- I I-~ I l

• HITIllglll MOTOR OPERAATED VALVE MIEROWIII I

______-- ~~izizi DATA SHEET 0" LIST I I -. _________ I-I-1.--4 ---- I-I -~

CNKD T

l I T i i iI I -- H-I--t I- I I I lI l l i uul i i -~

SIP,

-.- ,-.TF PA-,SSN IISol 0Sk.

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FOR DESIGN SPECIFICATION NO. 8179 ENVIRONMENTAIJSEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND FUNCTIONAL TEST FIGURES FURNISHING AND DELIVERING MANUALLY, ELECTRIC MOTOR AND PNEUMATICALLY OPERATED VALVES COMPLYING WITH THE ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE SECTION mI, DIVISION 1, CLASS 1, 2 AND 3 (PG&E DESIGN CLASS 1)

FOR NUCLEAR SERVICE AT UNITS 1 AND 2, DIABLO CANYON SITE Y:l.TWI6U31H.IILOC

0 Cj 0

IL.

w lp.r AN 0j a.

0 to I-- a tyl TIME (MIN)

8179, Rev 2N OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE VS TIME RESPONSE (Note: Use Comp 9)

EXCERPT FROM DCM T-12, REV 1, FIG 4-24

8179, Rev 2N INSIDE CONTAINMENT TEMPERATURE VS TIME RESPONSE Peak. TezperatuM*m3 470, M.0 lit:: 1 _1 _i_

SETPOflNT(IS MSIA) cALsts I19 10.01 1 111 I III 100.104.10 1.00 I 100O.6I IlON I WV*W l*

I In a W'V*I*Fo

• iv OW0.8 EXCERPT FROM DCM T-20, APP A, REV 1,FIG A3.2-4

8179, Rev 2N SFIGURE 4 INSIDE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE VS TIME RESPONSE Peak: 46.6 psig at 133 sees.

PRESSURE (PSIG) 50 40 I

30 20 10 IE-02 I E-01 IE+O0 IE+01 I E+02 IE+03 IE+04 IE+05 IE+06 IE+O TIME (SECONDS)

EXCERPT FROM DCM T-20, APP A, REV 1,FIG A3.2-1

8179, Rev. 2N Page I of I FIGURE 5 Nominal Size of Qualified Valve (inches)

Qualification Extends to Valves of the following Nominal Size (Inches):

J12 3/4 1 1 -1T 2 1 4 161 10 12 3 14 16 It 20 22 24 26 21 30 36 1,2 XX I X 3/4 X X X I X I X X 1-I/2 x _ 5F3Fx

_X x X X 2 X X X 3 X X X 4 X XX 6 x xX I0 - - - - - x 16 16 XX x x X x x -

X x x X - - -

20 x x xX x xX 22 x x- xXx x x 24 - - x x x x x x X 26 -x - - x x x 2- - x x X x x 30 x 1 Ix x x x 36 .x x X 1/2 3/4 1 1 -1/2 2 3 t 10 12 1416 16 1It 20 22 24 26 22 30 36 Note: Test data acquired for a qualified valve may be used to qualify valves of the same type within the ranges noted above, provided geometric similarity is maintained and supported by stress analyses provided to the buyer.

y.DPST96"* I31LDOC

IO" RE(goW$ SHt M31Cl2 lmmL" n-ww

• .0. I=OUOC vqgSCCTu Pme WVALK Assoy & eLlcC1 =O QFMan 0Vom Cmw, P MTIPll?. UwI t I Cl. P.O.m. 71:1 I mu 02 SPEOFICATKIOU iDM,:6179 REV.I SAH0I~I

[."133-3 ANCHOR/DARUNG VALVE COMPANY 8"-600 WELD ENDS STAINLESS STEEL TILT DISC CHECK VALVE WITH RH INSPECTION PORT SHM I OF 2 c- of ACM I M 9-24-10 Oe§6 IiF -y A An. We RHM DATE 1-9.tt-234 s .

PXi ow I FA~f 1

• picarm 1~

MATERIAL !Tyl,. ý REIIOONS I V..

SPEC.'Ha. ADE1[DR V. I.

SHEET IsADO'D a e.0. NOTE.

SHEETWAOE NOITS I AND AC A 10. NOTW2$ AODDD0-60 -o -

VALVEWT.DTTAILAs ADDEO 2100 -r 7,7/. WIANON. PARTS LIST MAX* NOTE, S WASi SHEET2%PARTH4. 05St ADDEDI/2 DA. PART NO.

2we 4- 2161 ADDED5/S DIA. NOTE 3# 1SGOWAS2100. NOTE 4 HLD O WASVALVETO PE INSTALLED HI " I I" HORIZONTAL RUN Of PIPE WITHBONNETONTOP AND fl cV 1500 -+ HINGEPINs HORIZONTAL so"o 4 m0 -f IO I4) IO I O4 14 K) bo0 1000 W0 l000 000 3000 FLOW.OrW NOTES_

1. VALVEIS ASlE, CLASSI PER 100e ASE SEMCION N St,APPRONVALVEWEIGHT-400 LOS INCLUDING-Ii/j/iOaVan. PIPes AN CAP APPROX 0"00 VALVEALONE- 416 LBI

3. APPROXS, - 100 (FULL OPEN)

4. DIS FOR SIR C9530-3 MODII AT.AD FORiPtWALLATION IN V1RTICAL (FLOWUP)

MI PIPELpIN.DISCFOR S/N 999360 STIILAMY AT MOODIFIE ATJOSSITE S. ANCHOR/DARLING SERIALOHn$ 04304-,1. 0530-3-2 A.

A. DEOTES RECoIMEUND SPARCPARTS S. DENOTESPARTSCOVERDO NY '*"--PARTS-C. DENOTES PARTSCOVERD WY "IP*.Ar

7. MOOEL/fIWJWEc No., W90OUSV

8. oPCRATINOCONDfITONS:

ININ MAX(ACCHIDNT MAX(NORMAL)

FLOW(oPU) 1300 4o00 (NUNOUT)

TEMP (DES f) AwS. 2,0 310 PRESS(PSIA) 1WO 330 t0o I. VALVELOCATION, OUTSIDECONTAINMENT

30. VALVlSERVICEt DONATED WATER PACIFmI Sl

@A ELEOTRIC00.

PiASLO CANYONPOWERPLANT.UNITNO. I CUST. P.O. 4A.1 037311 O11(182 SPECIFICATION "Os lite REV. 3 ANONOR/NLW ILO. 19530-3 ANCHOR/DARUHO VALVE COMPANY I

a"-600 WELD ENDS STAINLESS STEEL TILT DISC CHECK VALVE WITH. RH INSPECTION PORT Sntof a of I

'iF910qý2 7 i

// 0.

k AA**JSV (TYF) lVALV SERIAL NJI4lR H T WI I - 539-3-1 ,I.31 o.ES 2.S0" DETAIL B DETAIL C %NELD PEFR Ws 4.7 RFV..,

2# - SAME m1GJIG DISC MODIFICATION UNIT-I DETAIL OF LUG ITEM r SECTION -

FLOW 9 C.C. INCLUDES INSPECTION PORT VALVE ASSEMBLY PACIFIC GAS itELECTRIC CO.

DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT. UNIT NOS I -

CUST. P.O. NO., 037211 ITEM 0O SPECIFICATION NO.: 3179 REV. I ANCI4OR/DARLING 3.0. EBSB3" estf Pwei. 6oot.47-716 Ir~ 7A 2' OR/DARLING VALVE 8"-600 WELD ENDS STAINLESS STEEL TILT DISC CHECK VALVE WITH RH INSPECTION PORT 13 IKERSI ,J. DALAL A .11f90-19 CERTIFIED VENDOR'S lESLIEWASRIIS4N"M

-L .. i~ ?511 4 ~A.MD1Bf4 IlD~f6mA0m6I477f31 I?551 wn s.o i RHM I mm. ""540

,-1 1 . .: vml *11 Loc--04 T4" I`= Ina cog coo

-1 . .... - ........... m. .,.,,.

1900 South Saunders Street FLOWSERVE P.O. Box 1961 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 No. 169 DATE: 3/16/06 SIZE & FIGURE NO.:

3.0 600 SC QUALITY PROBLEM PART I VALVE NAME: Swing Check Valve CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN PART IVALVE NUMBER: 04001011-3530 ~-01 I

TRACEABILITY NO.: AY777 REJECT TICKET NO.: N/A RESPONSIBLE DEPT.: Eng./QAIManf.

INITIATED BY: Eric Fletcher PROBLEM (to be comnileted bv OA or resoonsible Deoarlmentl Fr Not Required - Reject Ticket Attached The customer discovered that the disc was hanging up on the cover when installed due to a design error. Upon further inspection, undercut and splatter was found on the bypass to valve weld. They also found indications and porosity on the valve itself.

9 Part 21 evaluation required []Yes [f] No Department Manager i. Date:

a ' 1.u - (

ROOT CAUSE and PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION within 30 days, which is !4/I1/0e There was not enough operational space for the disc to function properly inside the valve due to a design error. Secondly, the undercut and splatter were overlooked by the welder and the inspector, along with the P.T. indication and porosity.

BY: Da te:

CORRECTIVE ACTION will be completed by_4L/3/& Ar (to be completed by responsible Depairtment):

The design and test procedure has since been changed (ref. attached procedure) to reflect the necessary changes. A repair plan has been submitted to repair the valve and indications. The responsible engineer, welder and inspector have been made aware of the discrepancies.

By-, Date:

REVIEW/TRAI SPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL (ff Applicable) . ( 4*

Name of ResporIe ndidual Sinature Date . Date:

CONFIRMATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN to be verified by QA within 15 days of completion date, which Is  :

C/

4&vj"ý'/e"A

~e~4~- 1 . .

CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEWED BY: ._________ Date: ally,10"_

Form / /

Form No. 36-A-171 (03/06) Manager, Quarty Assurance or Designee

FLOWSERVE PLANT NAME Diablo Canyon VALVE QUANTITY 1 CUSTOMER NAME Pacific Gas & Electric SIZE 8 - 600 Tilting Disc Check Valve CUSTOMER'S ADDRESS 80OPrice Canyon Rd.,

Prismo Beach, CA 93449 OUR COMPLAINT REPORT NO. 4376 FLANGE Butt Weld Ends NATURE OF COMPLAINT Valve will not fully open, disc hangs BM NO.,SERIALNO. 040010113530601 up on bonnet RECEMNG REPORT NO. DATE MFG. Shipped 1/30/06 CONDION RECEIVED o FULLY ASSEMBLED 0 OPEN POSITION 0 LESS OPERATOR

[o DISMANTLED 0 CLOSED POSITION o CLEANED 0 THROTTLED REMARKS DE IPTION OF DEFECT

[_1 FRACTURE 0 DESIGN [] LEAKAGE 0 WORKMANSHIP 0 OTHER REMARKS As shipped, the disc will not fully open. The disc contacts the bonnet prior to full rotation (at approximately 50% open).

REASON OR CAUSE FOR FAILURE The disc design was modified for vertical installation by extending the counter balance to reduce the disc rotation. The cast disc counterweight extension design was not checked with a valve assembly layout due to a previous shipment from Flowserve-Williamsport of a similar design with a weld build-up. After the custom called in the complaint, the new disc was added to a valve layout and confirmed the disc design error.

The valve was tested per MS7252 which requires the disc to be cycled fully open and closed to confirm freedom of movement This dld not identify the disc

/bonnet Interference as the test procedure allows the disc cycle to be completed without the bonnet Installed.

CONCLUSION Disc design error and test procedure error. When valve components design are modified, the new design should be checked against the valve layout. MS7252 should be revised to require the disc cycle test to be completed with the bonnet installed.

Flow Control Dtivloon 8W!? Vak=

FLOWSERVEY!

March 16,2006 PG&E, Diablo Canyon FAX 805-545-2614 Attention: Paul Grable

Subject:

Repairs to 8" 600 lilting Disc Check Valve, Revision to Referenced Letters

Reference:

1. Valve Assembly Drawing W9023267

2. Flowserve Letters 3113106,3114/06 and 3115106

3. Telecon 3114/06

4. Valve SIN AY777

5. Body Heat Number 05260-X55I

6. Flowserve SO 35306 Gentlemen:

The subject repairs to correct the disc operational space shall include the following:

1. Evaluate disc for full open to close rotation.

2. Remove bonnet

3. Add a 1/8" x 45* chamfer on the front of the disc counterweight to clear the bonnet (Do not disassemble disc from body.)

4. Polish the bonnet to cleanup disc contact marks (bonnet min. thickness Is 1.283').

5. Thoroughly clean valve and parts.

6. Reassemble bonnet to valve.

7. Confirm a minimum clearance of 0.010W between disc counterweight and bonnet for full disc rotation.

8. Grind the disc counterweight stop (tang) and body casting (approximately 1/8") to mate at the stop for a wider contact (I").

9. Blue check to verify contact.

The subject repairs to correct the disc closing when full open shall include the following:

1. Per the attached sketch remove material from the disc counterweight As this is a non-pressure boundary area of the disc'casting no NDE is required on the new surface.

2. After disc counterweight material removal, with the valve assembly In the 'vertical" orientation verify that the disc with not hang-up in the open position.

3. For added margin, the verification step 2 can be repeated with the valve oriented 3" off "vertical" with the disc oriented in the more adverse position than that of step 2.

4. If both steps 2 and 3 are completed successfully, the material removal is complete and acceptable. If not successful, remove additional disc counterweight material in the same general area as step I and repeat steps 2 and 3 until successfully completed.

Note - The sketch is a rough illustration that does not require exact compliance. The real acceptance is in the steps 2 and 3, disc operational verification.

The undercut in the inspection port weld repairs shall include the following:

1. Liquid Penetrant examine weld.

2. Weld up undercut area.

3. Polish weld

4. Liquid Penetrant examine weld.

Pone" US lc Rilelgh Ope m Tod Fiem 1-80225-989 Flw C0kd Wbm PO Box 1961 PhM 1-MM-425 low SaoBW sueet F=nz -919-D31-33 P.egh, Nc 276WW

Page 2 of 2 The casting porosity repairs shall Include the following:

1. Liquid Penetrant examine the porous area of the casting.

2. Grind area (ifnecessary) and weld porous area.

3. Polish weld.

4. Liquid Penetrant examine the porous area of the casting.

5. Do not exceed minimum casting finish standards.

This repair plan is to be implemented by DCPP personnel, under the direction provided by an on-site Flowserve service technician. Performance of the described repairs does not invalidate any nuclear quality (N-Stamp) certlfications or warranties associated with this valve.

The newly supplied disc includes a cast stop area on the counterweight This was added to the casting, in lieu of a weld build-up, since the last supply of this valve design. it is dimensionally different than the previous disc due to casting tolerances and final fit-up of the disc. The disc final fit-up, as addressed above, will assure proper valve function and final length of the disc counterweight stop.

Valve installation orientation shall be horizontal pipe to vertical pipe with the bonnet above the valve up to vertical. Based on the above disc operation adjustments (step 3), the valve can be Installed up to 3" beyond vertical, but the operational margin will be reduced.

If you have any questions on the above, please feel free to contact us.

FA Bensinger, PE Senior Product Manager RPww'e US e R*O', OWf=* ToeFMee S-W-225M698 Dvi RA"CDonfr0i PO BM 1961 Ph  : 1919-832-O36 1900 am* S=we= Skwe Fesinde 1419-83-S RPJWh NC 27=03 w~mmymm Page 2 of 2

.9 (1 -

27/6,/c' 6

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 6 of 12 6.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measure in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3 Seat Leakage Test 6.3.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic seat test by applying pressure behind the disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port. Valves with resilient seats shall be given a high and low pressure hydrostatic seat test 6.3.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the seat test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

6.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduate, standpipe or other such graduated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3.4 "Check valves" with a resilient seat shall also be given an air seat test using water displacement measurement or equivalent method (See para. 3.7) 6A Operational Test 6.4.1 The disc shall be manually repositioned from the close to the fully open positions then allowed to slowly close to assure free movement (non-binding) of the parts. The hinge shall be evaluated for proper body contact when the disc is in the full open position in the swing check valves only. For tilting disc check valves, the disc operational test shall confirm it fully opens without contacting the bonnet or body until it is fully open.

6.4.2 Proper body contact slow closure of the of the disc valve shall internal partson be documented with the the testdisc full open and non-binding report.

6.4.3 The disc operational test detailed in 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 may be performed at the start of the testing prior to bonnet installation on the valve. For tilting disc check valves, the final operational test shall be performed with the bonnet installed.

7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Hydrostatic Shell Test The valve being tested shall show no leakage resulting from the hydrostatic test. However, leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintfin system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.2 Backseat Test The valve shall show no leakage resulting from the backseat test. However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

FLOWSERVE 10 CFR 21 EVALUATION COMMITTEE 10 CFR 21 FILE NO.-22

SUMMARY

SHEETI This form is for internal use only. It will be used to summarize the main points of any investigation of internal reports for delivered nuclear facility components which may have a deviation from technical requirements that could potentially cause a nuclear safety hazard.

COMPONENT DESCRIPTION 8'- 600 Class - Tilting Disc Check Valve P/N 04001011-35306-01 Valve S/N AY777 Shipped 1/30/06 DELIVERED TO: (Customer, P. 0., Date) SALES ORDER DATA Pacific Gas & Electric Sales Order 35306 Item I Diablo Canyon Power Plant Rurchase Order 125492. Item I k'r.ZLWWI receipt 'inspecton scovereot H the disc did not open fully and tended to 'stick' open. The valve is iria vertical application and 11' M st~*omer has a modified disc counterweight to prevent overtravel. The valve was previously supplied by Flowserve - Williamsport with the modification obtained by weld build-up. With S/N AY777, the disc casting was revised to provide the modification. Casting tolerances resulted in excess material that caused interference with the Bonnet Two factors prevented Flowserve from identifying the problem. 1) The Engineer did not do a valve layout because it was based on an existing Williamsport design. 2) The test procedure allowed the disc operation to be verified prior wOIng*t~ijng mp- mnnnet CORRECTIVE ACTION (Action taken/ CUSTOMER NOTIFIED?

planned to The procedure does not require a° f N¶~ 4 ~ds 13 Yes but does require a layout, if there is a modification to the existing OE No design. The Engineer was trained accordingly. cu me iden"e% ke'n* j2/6Rt-nQo'fe '9 s4r on 3/8/06. Flowserve provided a repair plan to resolve the issue on Test procedure MS7252 was revised to require final operational 3/16/06. The modified disc casting resulted in the interference. Since testing with the Bonnet installed, this was the first time the disc casting was supplied, Flowserve originally concluded that a Part 21 evaluation was not necessary. The No other valves were ever supplied with this disc casting, which Is not customer must not have understood that this situation was Isolated representative of the standard TDC design. No further corrective and issued a Part 21 report on 3/31/06.

005a MuM OKWAgrecesisry. COMMITTEE CONCURRENCE WITH EVALUATION Could this deviation cause a Member Signature Date Agree Disagree substantial safety hazard as defined in 10 CFR 21?

The valve as supplied may not dose 9J Yes properly, ifit wedges at the Bonnet Manager, q.A.

L] No U Requires Customer Evaluation Is this deviation reportable by -___ ____-__

FLOWSERVE .to NRC under 10 CFR 21? /

03 Yes 91 No Manager, Sales The Issue Is only applicable to Valve S/N AY777. The corrective actions will prevent recurrence.

Form 36-Q-277

Flow Control Division Raleigh, North Carolina NMTHOD SPECIFICATION MS 7252 REVISION 3 EFFECTIVE 31&8005 SUPERSEDES 1/27/03 ORIGINAL DATE 1/27/03 PAGE lofl1 TITLE: HYDROSTATIC AND OPERATIONAL TESTING FOR GATE, GLOBE, AND CHECK VALVES.

'1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This specification provides a standard that will insure that hydrostatic testing is in aconrdance with the im*posed edition of the ASME Section MI or B16.34 code.

• Double Disc Gate (D), Parallel Slide Gate (PS) and Flex Wedge Gate (FW) Valves

" Globe (GB), Y-Globe (YGB) and Stop Check Globe (GB) Valves

" Piston Check (PC) and Swing Check (SC) Valves Note: Bellows Valves and valves 2" and smaller are not included in this specification.

2.0 EXHIBITS AND TABLES Table 1: ASME Section HI 1971 Edition up to and including Winter 1972 Addenda Table 2: ASME Section 1l11971 Edition, Summer 1973 Addenda Table 3: ASME Section HI 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda up to and including ASME Section MI 1977 Edition, Summer 1977 Addenda Table 4: ASME Section M 1977 Edition, Winter 1977 Addenda up to and including ASME Section MI 1989, 1989 Addenda, and B16.34 EXHIBIT 1: Hydrostaticdrraceabllty Report 3.0 GENERAL TEST REQUREMENTS 3.1 Demineralized water shall meet the requirements of MS 8260, L.R.

3.1.1 All valves- shall be flushed with demineralized water afker testing.

3.1.2 Water used for rinsing carbon steel valves shall contain a suitable rist inhibitor.

3.2 Testing shall be at the pressures and for the time durations specified on the test data tables (rables 14) for the applicable valve pressure class, material, and ASME Section II code year.

The acceptance criteria or allowable leakage is provided in Section 7. Non-standard tests requirements will be provided in the QAP.

32.1 Test requirements shall be in accordance with the applicable specifications and code requirements.

3.2.2 Valves that have actuators or closure members which'are subject to damage at rated pressures shall have differential pressures across the closure member limited to 110%

of the maximum specified differential pressure.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 2ofll 3.2.3 Unless noted, pressures are given in psig, durations in minutes, and allowable leakage in cc/hr.

Note: Operational testing of the valves should be performed at the pressures and for the fime durations specified in the QAP.

3.3 External surfaces of the valve body shall be cleaned and dried prior to the shell test.

3A Valve body, bonnet, disc, bodyibonnet bolting or other pressure boundary parts shall not be painted before the shell pressure test is completed. Re-test may be performed in the painted condition.

3.5 The valve shall be purged of air prior to conducting shell and seat tests with waler.

3.6 Time duration for testing the valve is defined as the time period after the valve is fully prepared and under the required test pressure.

3.7 Low pressure seat tests (less than 100 PSI1 air, water, nitfogen, etc.) shall be performed after the hydrostatic shell, valve disc closures and operational tests are complete.

3.8 The packing test may be performed concurrently with the hydrostatic shell providing the required test pressures are the same.

3.9 The valve closure test and seat leakage test may be combined when the test pressures are the 3.10 Bolt torque information shall be in accordance with TA-160 for Non-Pressure Boundary bolting and TA-108 for Pressure Boundary bolting. Torque requirements for gland and bonnet retainer (pressure seal valves) bolting shall be in accordance with the sales drawing or route card, as specified in the QAP.

3.11 All gauges used will be calibrated under the system described in the Flo*serve Quality Assurance Manual Gauge numbers and calibration date shall be recorded on the test report form.

3.12 Record data on the test report form.

4.0 PROCEDURE FOR GATE VALVES 4.1- Hydrostatic Shell Test'P 4.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test in the partially open position with the valve ends closed. Leakage through the stem packing is not cause for rejection.

4.1.2 Pressurize the valve body to the shell test pressure.

4.1.3 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and inspect the valve for leakage.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

5 The applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

...-.-.---. '-~.-...

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 3 of11 4.2 Valve Closure Test 4.2.1 The valve shall be given a closure test with the disc in the fully closed position and the test pressure applied as a differential pressure across the valve disc. The test pressure shall be applied successively an each side of the closed disc.

4.2.2 Maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.3 SeTest 4.3.1 The valve shall be given a seat leakage test by applying fluid pressure successively to each side of the closed disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port.

4.3.2 Maintain the seat test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.3.4 When required by the contract (as noted in the QAP), double disc gate valves shall be given an additional low pressure seat test at 50 psig per para. 4.3.1 to 4.3.3 (see para.

3.7) 4A Backseat Test 4A.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage test with the valve in the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland loosened.

4.4.2 Maintain the backseat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.4.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the speqified allowable (see Section 7).

4.5 Packine Test 4.5.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakage test with the backseat removed from contact, the packing drawn down and pressure applied below the packing.

4.5.2 Maintain the packing pressure for required duration and note any leakage. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.6 Opeational Test 4.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the full valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensre smooth operation and movement.

4.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive force.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 4 of 11 5.0 PROCEDURE FOR GLOBE VALVES 5.1 Hdrostatic Shell Test"4 5.1.1 The valve shall be ven a hyostatic shell test in the partially open position with te valve ends closed. Leakage through the stem packing is not cause for reqectiou.

5.1.2 Pressurize the valve body to the shell test pressum.

5.1.3 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and iimpect the valve for leakage.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of tewporwy seals installed for the purpose of conduction the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2 Tbhe applicable code year influences the duration ofthe hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration limes.

5.2 Valve Closure Test 5.2.1 The valve shall be given a closure test with the valve plug in the fidly closed position and differential test pressure applied in the normal flow direction across the valve plug.

5.2.2 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied upstream ofthe valve. Maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

5.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

5.3 See Leaag Tese 5.3.1 The valve shall be given a seat leakage test by applying pressure downstream ofthe plug, unless noted otherwise to measure leakage at the opposite port.

5.3.2 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied downstream of the plug. Maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and not any leakage.

5.3.3 Valves with actuators, mechanical, fluid or electrical, shall be limited to testing with the test pressure at 110% of the maximum specified differential pressure to avoid subjecting closure members to damage.

5.3.4 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such calibrated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section I For stop check globe valves make sure the stem is in the open position to ensure no loading interfeec during the seat test.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 5ofll 5.4 Backseat Test 5A.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage test with the valve in the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland loosened.

5.4.2 Maintain the backscat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified allowable.

5.4.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

5.5 Packing Test 5.5.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakage test with the backseat removed from contact, the packing drawn and pressure applied to the valve.

5.5.2 Maintain the pressure on packing for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified amount (see Section 7).

5.6 0C~~a 5.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the full valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensure smooth operation and movement.

5.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive force.

6.0 PROCEDURE FOR CHECK VALVES 6.1 HYdrosttic Shell Teice 6.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test with the valve ends closed and pressure applied in the flow open direction.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose ofconducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintan system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the'valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2 The applicable code year influences the duration ofthe hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

6.2 Valve Closure Test 6.2.1 The valve shall be given a disc closure test with the valve disc in the fully closed position and the test pressure applied behind the valve disc.

6.2.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 6of it 62.3 When present, leakage shall be measure in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3 Seat Leakage Test 6.3.1 The valve shal be given a hydrostatic seat test by applying pressure behind the disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port. Valves with resilient seats shall be given a high and low pressure hydrostatic seat test 6.3.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the seat test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

6.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduate, standpipe or other such graduated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3A "Check valves" with a resilient seat shall also be given an air seat test using water displacement measurement or equivalent method (See pera. 3.7) 6.4 Operational Test 6A.1 The disc shall be manually repositioned from the close to the fully open positions then allowed to slowly close to assure free movement (non-binding) ofthe pars. The hinge shall be evaluated for proper body contact when the disc is in the fMll open position in the swing check valves only.

6.4.2 Proper body contact of the valve internal parts with the disc full open and non-binding slow closure of the disc shall be documented on the test report.

6.4.3 The disc operational test detailed in 6.4.1 and 6A.2 may be performed at the start of the testing prior to bonnet isallation an the valve.

7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Hydrotatic Shell Test The valve being tested shall show no leakage resulting from the hydrostatic test. However, leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain q test pressur for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfes then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.2 Backseat Test The valve shall show no leakage resulting from the backseat test. However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.3 Packine Test The valve shall show no leakage resulting from the packing test. However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from tenmqrary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 7ofll 7.4 Closure and Seat Leakare Tests The allowable leakage resulting from the closure and seat leakage tests shall be no more than 10 cc/im/hr. When supplemental values are stated in the contract, this value shall be superseded by those stated in the QAP.

8.0 RECORDING OF TEST DATA 8.1 All test data shall be ecordled on Exlhbit I. Test Data Sheet fbrms shall be available through Q.A. documentation tedmician.

Prepared by:.

er, Manager Inside Sales & Application Engineering Date Approved by:. t3-15 Date Approved by:.

R. A. Baduki ,Assurance

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 8 ofI1 TABLE I HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS INACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111971 EDITION UP TO AND INCLUDING THE WINTER 1972 ADDENDA TABLE IA: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAIO5 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 15D 425 425 300 300 3DD 30D 300 1400 1100 750 750 750 750 Soo 2800 2175 1500 15D0 15DD 1500 M0 4175 3250 220D 2200 2200 2200 1500 6975 5400 36OO 3600 350 3MO Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE IB: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC9ISA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL 2 VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (213) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1400 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2800 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 4175 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6975 5400 3600 3536 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 1C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF8MISA479-316 STANDARD SEL VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) C2M3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1275 1100 750 750 750 750 500 2575 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3850 3250 2200 2200 22DO 220O 1500 6425 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 1D: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3MISA479416L STANDARD Si..*EL VALVE SEAT BACKSFAT PACKJNG PRESSURE CLASS (1) (213) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1075 775 760 750 750 750 600 2150 1550 1500 1600 1500 1500 90o 200 2325 2200 2200 2200 2200 1600 5350 3850 3600 3600 3600 3800 Duraion (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5. 5 5 Note 1: Accordk-g to the rernced code above lie test duration requirement is a ninimum of 10 minutes or 15 miates per inch of Me design min wall (see QAP for specifi duraon).

Note 2: The Wt pressure for the hydrstatic sheA test Is dependent on whether the valve Isa class 1.2 or 3.

The classes are denoted by ().

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 9ofIl TABLE 2 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASME SECTION 1111973 EDITION WITH THE 1973 SUMMER ADDENDA TABLE 2A: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBlSAIO5 STANDARD SKELW= VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PAClONG PRESSURE CLASS. (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2B: LOWALLOY CARBON STEEL SA2174wC91SA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL? VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACI]NG PRESSURE CLASS (1) (213) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 30O 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 5400 3600 3600 3600 3800 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFSMISA479-316 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2C3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2D: STAINLESS STEEL ,A351-CF3M/SA479-316L _

STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (03) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1000 775 750 750 750 750 600 2000 1550 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3000 2325 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 3850 3600 3600 3600 3800 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: Acooronfg) tohe referenced code above fhe test duraton requirement is a minimum o 10 minutes or 15 minutes peWinch of ie design mrin wall (see QAP fri speciic duration).

Note 2: The test ressure fbr bhe hydrostatc shell test Is dependent on whether lte valve is a class 1.2 cr &

The classes ore denoted by (.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE 10ofl TABLE 3 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS INACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111973 EDITION, WINTER 1973 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCLUDING ASME SECTION I111977, SUMMER 1977 ADDENDA TABLE 3A: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISA105 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CL06UFZE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3B: LOWALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC9ISA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE I50 425 275 300 300 300 300 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 3750 3600 3=00 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFSMMSA479-316 STANDARD SHELLO VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300 30O 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3D: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3WSA479-316L STANDARD SHELW. VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 3W0 300 300 1000 670 750 750 750 600 2000 1336 1500 1500 1500 900 3M00 2005 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 33 3600 3600 36M0 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: According to the referenced code above the lest ducwaon requirement is a minimumn of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per inch of te design min wall (see QCAP for specific dunaon).

Note 2: Notice fiat the hydfsta3ic lest pressure is no longer dependent Luo= the nuclear class of fte valve.

MS 7252 REVISION 3 PAGE IIofli TABLE 4 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS INACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111977 EDITION, WINTER 1977 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCWDING ASME SECTION 1111989, WITH THE 1989 ADDENDA AND B16.34.

TABLE 4A: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCB/SAI05 STANDARD VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS SHELL CLOSURE LEAKAGE SACKSEAT PAC 150 450 315 315 315 315 300 1125 625 25 625 825 600 2225 1650 1650 1650 1650 go9 3350 2450 2450 2450 2450 1500. 5575 4075 4075 4075 4075 Duration (minutes) (Se. note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC91SA182 F22 STANDARD VALVE SEAT "

PRESSURE CLASS SHELL CL REBACKSEAT PACKING 150 4W0 320 32 M2 32 300 1125 825 825 25, 2 600 2250 1650 1650 1650 1650 900 3375 2475 2475 2475 2475 1500 525 4125 4125 4125 4125 Dura-on(rninutes) See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF8M/SA479-316 STANDARD VALVE SEAT P PRESSURE CLASS SHELL CLOSURE A GE ACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 310 310 310 310 300 1100 800 800 800 800 600 2175 1600 1600 1600 1600 900 3250 2400 2400 2400 2400 1500 5400 3975 3975 3975 3975

-Duration m(nutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5s TABLE 40: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3M/SA479416L STANDARD VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS SHELL CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACING 150 350 310 310 310 310 300 900 800o 6 800 600 600 1s80 1600 1600 1600 Is60 9oo 2700 2400 2400 2400 2400 1500 450O 3975 3975 3975 3975 Duration(minutes) (See note ) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: if tie appicable Code year is cariarn the Stmner Addenda of 1981 lien the test duraon requirement Is a minimum of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per inch of fle design main w4L If*fe apprl:cble code is dt ausow of 1981 Addenda or later then the tes%duraton is a minimum of 10 minutes (see QAP for specific duration).

MS 7252 Revision 3 F LOANSEREVEN' I , , Sales Order . Line Item EXHIBIT 1: TRACEABILITY/ HYDRO REPORT TEST GAGE PSI ALLOWABLE OPERATION NO. CALIB. (MPa) MIN. LEAKAGE HYDRO TEST MS/REV B8akSeat IiIII Shell VALVE DESC. Seat CUSTOMER VALVE ACTUAL TESTER CUSTOMER SERIAL NO. BODY BONNETCOVER STEM DISK LEAKAGE NO. DATE INSPECTOR FLOWSERVE INSPECTOR: CUSTOMER INSPECTOR:

Form 36-"-814 Rev. 2 (01/2005) Date Date

Flow Control Division Raleigh, North Carolina FLOWSERVE METHOD SPECIFICATION MS 7252 REVISION 4 EFFECTIVE 3/15/2006 SUPERSEDES 1/27/03 ORIGINAL DATE 1/27/03 PAGE I of 12 TITLE: HYDROSTATIC AND OPERATIONAL TESTING FOR GATE, GLOBE, AND CHECK VALVES.

1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This specification provides a standard that will insure that hydrostatic testing is in accordance with the imposed edition of the ASME Section IH or B16.34 code.

0 Double Disc Gate (DD), Parallel Slide Gate (PS) and Flex Wedge Gate (FW) Valves

• Globe (GB), Y-Globe (YGB) and Stop Check Globe (GB) Valves

• Piston Check (PC) and Swing Check (SC) Valves Note: Bellows Valves and valves T' and smaller are not included in this specification.

2.0 EXHIBITS AND TABLES Table 1: ASME Section 111 1971 Edition up to and including Winter 1972 Addenda Table 2: ASME Section III 1971 Edition, Summer 1973 Addenda Table 3: ASME Section 1111971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda up to and including ASME Section 1I 1977 Edition, Summer 1977 Addenda Table 4: ASME Section 1111977 Edition, Winter 1977 Addenda up to and including ASME Section III 1998 Edition, 2000 addenda and B16.34 - 1988. U LRJ EXHIBIT 1: HydrostatictTraceability Report 3.0 GENERAL TEST REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Demineralized water shall meet the requirements of MS 8260, L.R.

3.1.1 All valves shall be flushed with demineralized water after testing.

3.1.2 Water used for rinsing carbon steel valves shall contain a suitable rust inhibitor.

3.2 Testing shall be at the pressures and for the time durations specified on the test data tables (Tables 1-4) for the applicable valve pressure class, material, and ASME Section EIlcode year.

The acceptance criteria or allowable leakage is provided in Section 7. Non-standard tests requirements will be provided in the QAP.

3.2.1 Test requirements shall be in accordance with the applicable specifications and code requirements.

3.2.2 Valves that have actuators or closure members which are subject to damage at rated pressures shall have differential pressures across the closure member limited to 110%

of the maximum specified differential pressure.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 2of 12 3.2.3 Unless noted, pressures are given in psig. durations in minutes, and allowable leakage in c/hr.

Note: Operational testing of the valves should be performed at the pressures and for the time duradons specified in the .QAP.

3.3 External surfaces of the valve body shall be cleaned and dried prior to the shell test.

3.4 Valve body, bonnet, disc, body/bonnet bolting or other pressure boundary parts shall not be painted before the slelj pressure test is completed. Re-test may be performed in the painted condition.

3.5 The valve shall be purged of air prior to conducting shell and seat tests with water.

3.6 Time duration for testing the valve is defined as the time period after the valve is fully prepared and under the required test pressure.

3.7 Low pressure seat tests (less than 100 PSIG air, water, nitrogen, etc.) shall be performed after the hydrostatic shell, valve disc closures and operational tests are complete.

3.8 The packing test may be performed concurrently with the hydrostatic shell providing the required test pressures are the same.

3.9 The valve closure test and seat leakage test may be combined when the test pressures are the same.

3.10 Bolt torque information shall be in accordance with TA-160 for Non-Pressure Boundary bolting and TA-108 for Pressure Boundary bolting. Torque requirements for gland and bonnet retainer (pressure seal valves) bolting shall be in accordance with the sales drawing or route cird, as specified in the QAP.

3.11 All gauges used will be cahibrated under the system described in the Flowserve Quality Assurance Manual. Gauge numbers and calibration date shall be recorded on the test report form.

3.12 Record data on the test report form.

4.0 PROCEDUIRE FOR GATE VALVES 4.1 Hydrostatic Shell TestgH 4.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test in the partially open position with the valve ends close& Leakage through the stem packing is not cause for rejection.

4.1.2 Pressurize the valve body to the shell test pressure.

4.1.3 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and inspect the valve for leakage.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

The applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 3 of 12 4.2 Valve Closure Test 4.2.1 The valve shall be given a closure test with the disc In the fully closed position and the test pressure applied as a diffential pressure across the valve disc. The test pressure shall be applied successively on each side of the closed disc.

4.2.2 Maintain the closure test pressure"for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.3 StILes 4.3.1 The valve shall be given a seat leakage test by applying fluid pressure successively to each side of the closed disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port.

4:3.2 Maintain the seat test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.3.4 When required by the contract (as noted in the QAP), double disb gate valves shall be given an additional low pressure seat test at 50 psig per part. 4.3.1 to 4.3.3 (see para.

3.7) 4.4 Backseat Ts 4.4.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage test with the valve in the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland loosened.

4.4.2 Maintain the backseat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.4-3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.5 Packin Test 4.5.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakage test with the backseat removed from conta, the packing drawn down and pressure applied below the packing.

4.5.2 Maintain the packing pressure for required duration and note any leakage. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.6 ational Test 4.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the full valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensure smooth operation and movement.

4.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive force. The differential pressure hal be the F pressure class, i.e. 150,300 etc. unless stated otherwise in the QAP. I !H .

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 4 of 12 5.0 POCEDURE FOR GLIDBE VALVES 5,1 Hydrostatic Shell TeP 5.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test in ft partially open position with the valve ends closed. Leakage through the sten packing is not cause for rejection.

5.1.2 Pressurize the valve body to the shell test pressure.

5.1.3 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and inspect the valve for leakage.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage oftemporary seals installed for the purpose of conduction the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2 The applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

5.2 Valve Closure Test 5.2.1 The valve shall be given a closure test with the valve plug in the fully closed position and differmntial test pressure applied in the normal flow direction across the valve plug.

5.2.2 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied upstream of the valve. Maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

5.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

5.3 Seat Le ge Test 5.3.1 The valve khall be given a seat kakage test by applying pressure downstream of the plug, unless noted oterwise to measure leakage at the opposite port.

5.32 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied downstream of the plug. Maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and not any leakage.

5.3.3 Valves with actuators, mechanical, fluid or electrical, shall be limited to testing with the test pressure at 110% of the maximum specified differential pressure to avoid subjecting closure members to damage.

5.3.4 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such calibated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

'For stop check globe valves make sure the stem is in the open position to ensure no loading interference during the seat test.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 5 of 12 5.4.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage test with the valve in the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland loosened.

5.42 Maintain the backseat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified allowable,.

5A.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allow-able (see Section 7).

5.5 Packine Test 5.5.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakage test with the backseat removed from contact, the packing drawn and pressure applied to the valve.

5.5.2 Maintain the pressure on packing for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified amount (see Section 1).

5.6 Operational Test 5.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the fall valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensure smooth operation and movement.

5.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive.force. The dif*erntial pressure shall be the pressure class, i.e. 150,300 etc., unless stated otherwise in the QAP.

6.0 PROCEDURE FOR CMECK VALVES 6.1 Hydrostatic Shell Test*

6.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shCU test with the valve ends closed and pressure applied in the flow open direction.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

t The applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

62 Valve Closure Test 6.2.1 The valve shall be given a disc closure test with the valve disc in the fully closed position and the tes pressure applied behind the valve disc.

6.2.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 6of12 6.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measure in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (m Section 7).

63 Seat Leakage Test 6.3.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic seat test by applying pressure behind the disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port. Valves with resilient seats shall be given a high and low pressure hydrostatic seat test.

6.3.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the seat test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

6.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduate, standpipe or other such graduated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3.4 "Check valves" with a resilient seat shall also be given an air seat test using water displacement measurement or equivalent method (See para. 3.7) 6.4 Operational Test 6.4.1' The disc shall be manually repositioned from the close to the Tally open positions then allowed to slo.wly close to assu free movement (non-binding) of the parts, The hinge shall be evaluated for proper body contact when the disc is In the fall open position in the swing check valves only. For tilting disc check valves, the disc operational test shall confirm it fully opens without contacting the bonnet or body until it is fifuly Open.

6.4.2 Proper body contact ofthe valve internal parts with The disc full open and non-binding slow closure of the disc shall be documented on the test report.

6.4.3 The disc operational test detailed in 6.4.1 and 6.42 may be performed at the start of the testing prior to bonnet installation on the valve. For tilting disc check valves, the final operational test shall be performed with the bonnet installed.

7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Hvdroac Shell The valve being tested shall show no leakage resulting from the hydrostatic test. However, leakage oftemporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage fr-om temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.2 Backsat Ts The valve shall show no leakage resulting from the backseat test However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 7 of 12 73 Pac~dnwTs The valve shall show no leakage resulting fmm the packing test However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. Ifleakage from temporary seals is masdng the valve sfaces then it must be directed way so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.4 Closure and Seat Ikae Tests The allowable leakage resulting from the closure and seat leikage tests shall be no more da 10 ccam/hr. When supplemeatal values awe stated in the oontract, this value shall be superseded by those stated in the QAP.

8.0 RECORDING OF TEST DATA 8.1 All test data shall be recorded on Exhibit I. Test Data Sheet forms shall be available through Q.A_. documentation technician.

Prepared by:.

Diter F. A- Bensinger, Senior Produtt Manager Approved by: Date J. P.Tu nag E Approved by:. Date ssurance

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 8 oQf12 TABLE I HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111971 EDITION UP TO AND INCLUDING THE WINTER 1972 ADDENDA TABLE 1A. CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAIO5 STANDARD SHELLW VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2M3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1400 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2800 2175 1600 1500 1500 150o 900 4175 325D 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6975 6400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE IB: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WCS/SA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL" VALVE SEAT SACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1400 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2800 2175 1500 1500 1500 1600 900 4175 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6975 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE IC: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFSMISA47B-316 STANDARD SHEL. VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2M3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1275 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2575 2176 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3850 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 150 6425 6400 360 36 3600 3600 Duraton (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE ID: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3MMSA470-316L StANDARD SHL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKJNG PRESSURE CLASS (1) (CM3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1075 775 750 750 750 750 600 2150 1550 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3200 2325 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6350 3850 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: Aoordag to the refereaed code above the telst duration requirment is a minimum of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per inch of the desir min walg (see QAP for Specific duration).

Note 2: The test pressure for the hydrostatic shell test is dependent on whether the valve Is a class 1, 2 or 3.

The classes are denoted by ().

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE - 9 of 12 TABLE,2 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASME SECTION III 1973 EDITION WITH THE 1973 SUMMER ADDENDA TABLE 2A' CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAIO5 STANDARD SHELL? VALVE SEAT (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1600 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 562 5400 36Do 3W60 60 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WCSISA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL? VALVE SEAT (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 760 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900W 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 5400 3600 360O 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2C: STAINLESS STEEL SA361-CF8M/SA479-316 STANDARD SHELL' VALVE SEAT (1) (2M3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS 160 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 760 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200. .2200".

1500 5625 540o 3600 3600 36M0 3600 Durabon (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5" 5 TABLE 2D1 STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3MISA479-316L STANDARD SHEL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (20) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 160 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1000 775 750 750 750 750 600 2000 1560 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3000. 2326 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 3850 3600 3600 3800 36=0 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1; According to the referenced code above the test duration requirement Is a rrdnknrum of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per Inch of the design min wall (see QAP for peific duration).

Note 2: The test pressure for the hydrostatic shell test Is dependent on whether the valve is a cls 1. 2 o 3.

The classes are denoted by ().

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 10of12 TABLE 3 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111973 EDITION, WINTER 1973 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCLUDING ASME SECTION 1111977, SUMMER 1977 ADDENDA TABLE 3A: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAO05 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT WKSEAT PACIONG PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1126 760 760 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3376 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 6625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WCfllSA182 F22 STANDARD SHELC VALVE SEAT dACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 276 30, 300 300 300 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 6625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duraton (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFBMISA479-316 STANDARD SmwL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300" 300 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500" 5625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5-TABLE 3D: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3M/SA479-316L STANDARD sHEI.. VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE BCEAT PACKING 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1000 670 750 750 750 600 2000 1336 1500 1500 1500 g00 3000 2005 2200 2200 2200 1500 82 3345 300 36D0 3500 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: According to the referenced code above the test duration requirement I a minimum of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per Inch of the design rain wagl (see CAP for specific duration).

Note 2: Notice that the hydrostatic tes pressure is no longer dependent upon the nuclear class of the valve.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE I1 of 12 TABLE 4 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1I 1977 EDITION, WINTER 1977 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCLUDING ASME SECTION 1111998, WITH THE 2000 ADDENDA AND B16.34 - 1998. IF4 TABLE 4Ak CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAIO5 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 450 315 315 315 315 300 1125 825 825 825 825 600 2225 1650 1650 1650 1650 900 3350 2450 2450 2450 2450 1500 5575 4075 405 4075 4075 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC91SA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 450 320 320 320D320 300 1125 825 825 825 825 600 2250 1850 1650 1650 1650 900 3375 2475 2475 2475 2475 1500 5625 4125 4125 4125 4125 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4C: STAINLESS STEEL SA3SI-CFSMISA479-316 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 310 310 310 310 300 1100 800 800 800 800 600 2175 1600 1600 1600 1600 g0o 3250 2400 2400 2400 2400 1500 5400 3975 3975 3975 3975 Duration (minutes) (See.note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 410:. STAINLESS STEEL SA3M1-CF3MISA47L-316L STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT BACKEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 35D 310 310 310 310 300 900 800 800 800 800 600 1800 1600 1 1600 1600 1600 900 2700 2400 2400 2400 2400 1500 4500 3975 3975 3975 3975 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: If the applicable Code year is earlier than the Sumn~er Addenda of 1981 then the test duration requirement Is a minimum of 10 mnrrtes or 15 minutes per inch of the design min wagl. Ifthe apldicable code Isthe summer of 1981 Addenda or later then the test duration Is a minknum of 10 minutes (see QAP for specific duration)+

"Ites I~uf FLOW "Mi7m 71s~

go.BIT 1: TIA oBLRmY a O REPO1'r+

-+ -: -...- -

HNMO1TE$MrM "-ft ~ ~ *..n-vnvzvna

-...- .. .. _L 1.

-- VALVP -- - .1 1 q I ., I -- - --" oil 0 saw I m vRtAfo. I nIwm t Ar"WPJ4 CUMMIR LIM I DfAR

~ehLmu +~

I

- I. - J.- -~ J.- I

.. . . . . .* . ,:}r, ilh- "

, 1  ; rn.- 4 -_

1'i t .1 1 lo -. -f. 1 m ,

iill

..... . . . 4 I, ,

~4 rn-rn 4 I

. . .. . . .. LJI I

• llll _ ... .. . , 1 . . . .i* ..,, . -.. ... . . . .I. .

_.. t t. u F- 4 -

F T I I F +-4-"---- +

, i ,, 1. 1 - 1 wN m i Ias !New" 0-on ! -

-1w- I J... a- ... - I ~rn 44.4.

II . I

~~~~-9~19 - - I- - *I*ii4ii 4i

~1*

- I

- I m.rn-q.*~ ~w*~

- ~

I rn

- ..pp.4.

. ... . .. . . . . .. I I M,& I - 1 RFVmsmEmv. CUBRI*41PWO ita m... UAJ~*dt 3 I ~O'~7~ I'~ I WT*~ JVdEIAflUI Ufl~

m

Flow Control Division Raleigh, North Carolina FLOWSERVE METHOD SPECIFICATION MS 7252 REVISION 4 EFFECTIVE 3/15/2006 SUPERSEDES 1/27/03 ORIGINAL DATE 1M27/03 PAGE I of 12 TITLE: HYDROSTATIC AND OPERATIONAL TESTING FOR GATE, GLOBE, AND CHECK VALVES.

1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This specification provides a standard that will insure that hydrostatic testing is in accordance with the imposed edition of the ASME Section III or B1634 code.

• Double Disc Gate (DD), Parallel Slide Gate (PS) and Flex Wedge Gate (FW) Valves

• Globe (GB), Y-Globe (YGB) and Stop Check Globe (GB) Valves

• Piston Check (PC) and Swing Check (SC) Valves Note: Bellows Valves and valves 2" and smaller are not included in this specification.

2.0 EXHIBITS AND TABLES Table I- ASME Section 11 1971 Edition up to and including Winter 1972 Addenda Table 2: ASME Section III 1971 Edition, Summer 1973 Addenda Table 3: ASME Section 1I 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda up to and including ASME Section III 1977 Edition, Summer 1977 Addenda Table 4: ASME Section 1111977 Edition, Winter 1977 Addenda up to and including ASME Section M]

1998 Edition, 2000 addenda and B 16.34 - 1988. 0IE "]

EXHIBIT 1: Hydrostatic/Traceability Report 3.0 GENERAL TEST REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Demineralized water shall meet the requirements of MS 8260, LR.

3.1.1 All valves shall be flushed with demineralized water after testing.

3.1.2 Water used for rinsing carbon steel valves shall contain a suitable rust inhibitor.

3.2 Testing shall be at the pressures and for the time durations specified on the test data tables (Tables 1-4) for the applicable valve pressure class, material, and ASME Section El1 code year.

The acceptance criteria or allowable leakage is provided in Section 7. Non-standard tests requirements will be provided in the QAP.

3.2.1 Test requirements shall be in accordance with the applicable specifications and code requirements.

32.2 Valves that have actuators or closure members which are subject to damage at rated pressures shall have differential pressures across the closure member limited to 110%

of the maximum specified differential pressure.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 2 of 12 32.3 Unless note4, pressre amrgiven in psig, dur-ations in minutes, mnd allowable leakage inccOIr.

• Note: Opmatonal testing of the valves should be performed at the pressures and for the *me durations specified in the.QAP.

3.3 External surfaces ofthe valve body shall be cleaned and dried prior to the shell tesL 3.4 Valve body, bonnet, disc, body/bonnet bolting or oher pressure boundary parts shall not be painted before the shell pressure test is completed. Re-test may be performed in the painted condition.

3.5 The valve shall be purged of air prior to conducting shell and seat test; with water.

3.6 Time duration for testing the valve is defined as the time period after the valve is fully prepared and under the required test pressure.

3.7 Low pressure seat tests (less than 100 PSIG air, water, nitrogen, etc.) shall be performed after the hydrostatic shell, valve disc closures and operational tests are complete.

3.8 The packing test may be performed cown reutly with the hydrostatic shell providing the required tea pressures ar the same.

3.9 The valve closure test and seat leakage test may be combined when the test pressures are the same.

3.10 Bolt torque information shall be in accordance with TA-160 for Non-Pressure Boundary bolting and TA-108 for Pressure Boundary bolting. Torque requirements for gland and bonnet retainer (pressure seal valves) bolting shall be in accordance with the sales drawing or route card, as specified in the QAP.

3.11 All gauges used will be cahlbrated znder the system described in the Flowserve Quality Assurance Manual. Gauge numbers and calibration date shall be recorded on the test report form.

3.12. Record data on the test report forrm.

4.0 FROCMM)UIE FOR GATE VALVES 4.1 Hydrostatic Shell Ttst 4.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test in the partially open position with the valve ends close&. Leakage through the stem packing is not cause for rejection.

4.1.2 Pressurize the valve body to the shell test pressure.

4.1.3 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and inspect the valve for leakage.

'Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conduaft the test Is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for te required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2 7he applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 3 of 12 4.2 Valve Closure Test 4.2.1 ThIe valve shall be given a closure test with the disc In the fully closed position and the test pressure applied as a dffentia pressure acr the valve disc. The tea press=

shali be aPPi successively on each side of the closed disc, 4.2.2 aintain the closure test pressur* for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.2.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.3 SetTe 4.3.1 The valve shall be given a seat leakage test by applying fluid pressure successively to each side of the closed disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port 4:3.2 Maintain the seat test pressure for The required duration and note any leakage.

4.3.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Secon 7).

4.3.4 When required by the contrct (as noted in the QAP), double disc gale valves shall be given an additional low pressure seat test at 50 psig per pars. 4.3.1 to 4.3.3 (see pars.

3.7) 4.4 BackseatI 4.4.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage lest with the valve in the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland loosened.

4.4.2 Maintain the backseat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

4.4.3 When present, leakage shall be measured In a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.5 PackiTes 45.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakage test with the backseat removed from contact, the packing drawn down and pressure applied below the packing 4.5.2 MaNtain the packing pressre for required duration and note any leakage- Leakage must be less than .e specified allowable (see Section 7).

4.6 QpaI~ona*

4.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the fWll valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensure smooth operation and movement.

4.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive force. The differntial pressure shall be the ]

pressure class, i.e. 150, 300 etc unless stated otherwise in the QAP. I El

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 4 of 12 5.0 PROCEDURE FOR GLOBE VALVES 5.1 Hydrostatic Shell Tesp1 5.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test In the.partially open position with the valve ends closed. Leakage through the stem pcidng is not cam fr rejection.

5.1.2 Pressurize toe val body to thde shell test presue.

5.13 Maintain the shell test pressure for required duration and inspect the valve for leakag&

'Under The test conditions the valve shall sbow no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conduction the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking valve srfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2 The applicable code year influences the duration ofthe hydrostatic test, please see QAP for specific duration times.

5.2 Valve ClosureTes 5.2.1 The valve shall be given a cloure test with the valve plug in the fully closed position and differential test pressure applied in the normal flow direction across the valve plug.

5.2.2 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied upsreamn of the valve. Maintain the closure te pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

52.3 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated measure Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

5.3 Seat L&&-=~ Test' 5.3.1 The valve shall be given a seat leakag test by applying pressure downstream of the plug. unless noted olherwLse to measure leakage at the opposite port 5.3.2 Valve is closed and test pressure is applied downstream ofthe plug. Maintain the closure test pressr for the required duration and not any leakage.

5.3.3 Valves with actuator mechanical, fluid or electrical, shall be lin'ted to testing with the test pressure at 110% ofthe maximum specified differential pressure to avoid subjecting closure members to damage.

5.3.4 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such cahlbrated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

'For stop check globe valves make sure the stem is in the open position to ensure no loading inted ce during the seat test.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 5 of 12 5.4 Bksei et 5.4.1 The valve shall be given a backseat leakage test with the valve In the backseated position, pressure applied to the body with the packing gland ioosed.

5.4.2 Maintain the backseat pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified allowable.

5.43 When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other such graduated meaure. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

5.5 Picking Tes 5.5.1 The valve shall be given a packing leakag tes with the backseat removed from contact, the packing drawn and p&ssure applied to the valve.

5.5.2 Maintain the pressure on packing for the required duration and note any leakage.

Leakage must be less then the specified amount (see Section 7).

5.6 Operational Test 5.6.1 The valve shall be operated through the full valve stroke (opened and closed) to ensure smooth operation and movement.

5.6.2 Open and close valve against the specified differential pressure. The valve should operate without requiring excessive force. The differential pressure shall be the pressure class, iLe. 150,300 etc-., unless stated otherwise in the QAP.I

[E 6.0 PROCEDUIE FOR CHECK VALVES 6.1 Hydrostatic Shell Test 1, 6.1.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic shell test with the valve ends closed and pres=e applied in the flow open direction.

1 Under the test conditions the valve shall show no leakage, however leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required tire. If leakage from temporary seals is masking dte valve surfaces then It must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

2

'The applicable code year influences the duration of the hydrostatic test, please see QAP for speific duration times.

6.2 Valve Closure Ts 6.2.1 Tbe valve shall be given a disc closure test with the valve disc in the fully closed position and the test pressure applied behind the valve disc.

6.2.2 With the valve in the closed position apply and maintain the closure test pressure for the required duration and note any leakage.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 6 of 12 6.2-3 When present, leakage shall be measure In a graduated cylinder, standpipe or other vach graduated measure. Leakage must be less thn the specifed allowable (see Section 7).

63 seat Leakage Test 63.1 The valve shall be given a hydrostatic seat test by applying pressure b6e the disc and measuring leakage from the opposite port. Valves with resilient seats shall be given a high and low pressure hydrostatic seat test.

6.3.2 With the valve In the closed position apply and maintain the seat test pressure for the requiid duration and note any leakage.

6.3.3. When present, leakage shall be measured in a graduate, standpipe or other such graduated device. Leakage must be less than the specified allowable (see Section 7).

6.3.4 "Check valves" with a resilient seat shall also be given an air seat test using water displacement measurement or equivalent method (See pars. 3.7) 6.4 Q ionTlest 6.4.1' The disc shall be manualy repositioned from the close to the folly open positions then allowed to slowly close to assure fee movement (non-binding) of the pars. The hinge shaM be evaluated for proper body contact when the disc is In the fl open position in the swing check valves only. For tilting disc check valves, the disc operational test shall confirm it fully opens without contacting the bonnet or body until it is fully op 6.4.2 Proper body contact of tbe valve internal parts with the disc full open and non-binding slow closure of the disc shall be documented on the test report.

6.4.3 The disc operational test detailed in 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 may be performed at the start of the testing prior to bonnet installation on the valve. For tilting disc check valves, the final operational test shall be performed with the bonnet installed.

7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Hv~odoatc Shell Ts The valve being tested shall show no leakage resulting from the hydrostatic test. However, leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the tet is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system test pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking ihe valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

7.2 Backseat Test The valve shall show no leakage resulting from the backseat test However leakage of temporary seals installed for the purpose of conducting the test is permitted unless the leakage exceeds the capacity to maintain system telt pressure for the required time. If leakage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces then it must be directed away so as to avoid masking leaks from the valve.

MS 7252 PEVISION 4 PAGE 7 of 12 73 Pa*kn* Test The valve sh show no lealkae resulting frmo the pawcn tes. However leakage of tTmporary seals Installed for the purpos of condzwft the test is permitted unless the leakage eed the capacity to maintai system test pressure for the requred timehIflcaage from temporary seals is masking the valve surfaces tn it must be direct away so as to avoid masIing leaks from tie valve.

7.4 Closure and Seat Lak T The allowable leakage resulting from the closure and seat leakage tusshall be no more ta 10 cc'mir. When supplemental values are stated in the cont*a, this value shall be superseded by those stated In the QAP.

8.0 RECORDING OF TEST DATA 8.1 All tesg data shall be recorded on Exhibit L Test Data Shae forms shall be available through Q.A. documentation tchnican.

Prepared by. E.A &e*gr, Iea#r &

F.A- Bensinger, Senior Pro 'utManaiger 7 Date Approved by*.

Date Approved by:

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE $ Qf 12 TABLE .

HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WVTH ASME SECTION 1111971 EDITION UP TO AND INCLUDING THE WINTER 1972 ADDENDA TABLE 1A. CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAID5 STANDARD SNEW VALVE SEAT EACKSEAT PACKING PRESSUJRE CLASS (1) (21) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1400 1100 750 760 750 750 600 2800 2175 1600 . 1500 1500 1600 900 4175 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6975 5400 3600 3800 36o 3600 Duraton (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 1 TABLE IB: LOW AtLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WCSlSA182 F22 STANDARD SHELLO VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2C) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 425 300 300S 300 300 300 1400 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2800 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 o00 4175 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6976 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE IC: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF8M/SA479-316 STANDARD SHELI! VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (213) CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1275 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2575 2175 1600 1500 1500 1500 900 3850 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6425 6400 3600 3600 300 36o0 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE ID: STAINLESS STEEL$SA351-CF3M/SA479-316L StANDARD SI-EL. VALVE SEAT BACIMEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2C3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1075 775 750 750 750 750 600 2150 1550 1500 1500 11500 1500 900 3200 2325 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 6350 3850 3600 3600 3800 3600 Duration (minutss) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: Acoordlng to the referenced code above the test duration requirement fs a minimum of 10 minutes or 15 minutes per Inch of the design min wall (see OAP for specific duraion).

Note 2:. The test pram" for the hydrostatic shell test Is dependent on whether the valve Is a class 1, 2 or 3.

The classes are denoted by ().

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 9 of 12 TABLE 2 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASME SECTION 1111073 EDITION WITH THE 1973 SUMMER ADDENDA TABLE 2A: CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISAIS0 STANDARD SHELL. VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2/3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 56M5 5400 360 350M 3600 3680 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 6 TABLE 2B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC9!SA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (2)3) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 30O 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1500 1600 1500 1500 900 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 5400 3600 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFBS/A479-316 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (1) (243) CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 425 300 300 300 300 300 1125 1100 750 750 750 750 600 2250 2175 1600 1500 1500 1500 0oo 3375 3250 2200 2200 2200. 2200..

'1500 5825 540 3600 3800 3800 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 2D: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3M/SA479-316L STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS (,) = CLOSURE LEAKAGE 160 425 425 300 300. 300 300 300 1000 776 750 750 750 750 600 2D00 1550 1500 1500 1500 1500 g00 3000. 2325 2200 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 3850 36D0 3600 3680 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: Aocording to the referenced code above the test duration requirement Is a minimum of 10 minutes or 15 miutes per Inch of the design min wall (se GAP for apecfric duration).

Note 2: The test pressure for the hydrostatic shell test Is dependent on whether the valve Is a class 1. 2 or 3.

The classes are denoted by ().

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 10 of 12 TABLE 3 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111973 EDITION, WINTER 1973 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCLUDING ASME SECTION 1111977, SUMMER 1977 ADDENDA TABLE 3A: CARBON STEEL SA2t6-WCBJSA105 STANDARD SHELL! VALVE BEAT SACKSEXT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGEI 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1125 760 760 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 5825 3750 3600 3600 3800 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WC9/SA182 F22 STANDARD SHELL. VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLAWS

• CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1125 750 750 760 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1600 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500 5625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 3C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFBNISA479-316 S"ANDARD PR.ESSURE CLASS. SHELL! V CLOSURE S LEAKAGE BCSA BACKSEAT AKN PACKING 150 425 275 300 300 300' 300 1125 750 750 750 750 600 2250 1500 1500 1500 1500 900 3375 2250 2200 2200 2200 1500" 5625 3750 3600 3600 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 6 5.

TABLE 3D: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CF3MISA479-316L STANDARD $me VALVE SEAT BACKSEAT PACKING PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE 150 425 275 300 300 300 300 1000 670 750 750 750 800 2000 1336 1500 1500 1500 900 3000 2005 2200 2200 2200 1500 5025 3345 3800 36D0 3600 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: According to the referenced code above the West duration requirement Isa minnmum of 10 mInutes or 15 minutes per Inch of the design rmin wall (see QAP for specfic duration),

Note 2: NoticAl that the hydrostatic test pressure Is no longer dependent upon the nuclear class of the vahve.

MS 7252 REVISION 4 PAGE 11 of 12 TABLE 4 HYDROSTATIC TEST PRESSURES AND DURATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME SECTION 1111977 EDITION, WINTER 1977 ADDENDA UP TO AND INCLUDING ASME SECTION 1111998, WITH THE 2000 ADDENDA AND B16.34 -1998. I FE4 TABLE 4A. CARBON STEEL SA216-WCBISA106 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT. PACKING 150 450 315 315 315 315 300 1125 825 825 825 825 600 2225 1550 1550 1850 1650 9o0 3350 2450 2450 2450 2450 1600 &575 4075 475 4o76 4075 Dur tion (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4B: LOW ALLOY CARBON STEEL SA217-WCSISAI82 F22 STANDARD SHELL VALVE . SEAT PRESSURECLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 450 320 320 320 320 300 1125 825 82u 825 825 600 2250 1650 1650 160 1650 go0 3375 2475 2476 2475 2475 1500 5625 4125 4125 4125 4125 Duration"(minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 6 5 TABLE 4C: STAINLESS STEEL SA351-CFSMISA479-316 STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE BACKSEAT PACKING 150 425 310 310 310 310 300 1100 D0 800 800 800o 600 2175 1600 1600 100 1600 900 3250 2400 2400 2400 2400 1500 5400 . 3975 3975 3975 3975 Duration (minuLes) (Seep note 1) 3 5 5 5 TABLE 4D: STAINLESS STEEL SA361-CF3M/SA479-316L STANDARD SHELL VALVE SEAT ....

PRESSURE CLASS CLOSURE LEAKAGE ACKSEAT PACKING 150 350 310 310 310 310 300 go0o 800 800 800 800 600 1800 1600 1600 1600 1600 900 2700 24D0 2400 2400 2400 1500 4500 3975 3975 3975 3975 Duration (minutes) (See note 1) 3 5 5 5 Note 1: If the applicable Code year Is earier than the Summer Addenda of 1981 then the test dumrlon requirement Is a mininum of 10 minutes or 15 minute per Inch otthe designmin %%fl. Iffthe appkable ode Is the sumrner of 1981 Addenda or later then the test duration Isa minimum of 10 minutes (see OAP for speff'ic durtlon)+

ll-w.lloiýW-0-P *8t ino fl"n Lrf~

EX~J01T 1: TAQE IL~1Y~HYD~O ~EPO1~

HVtALCMO!W ft-ROO0414MM2 ~IuffMRR4P!OT~____________ 1__Oita _

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12/77 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of 6 PURPOSE:

To describe the method which assures compliance to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Rules and Regulations contained in Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 (10CFR21) for reporting of potential problems involving delivered valves, actuator control systems, and/or parts.

EXHIBITS:

I. Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 II. Notice to Employees on "N"Stamp Orders II1. Safety Deviation Report (Form No. 36-Q-276)

IV. 10CFR21 Eval. Committee Summary Sheet (Form No. 36-Q-277)

V. Flow Chart DEFINITIONS:

Basic Component - A plant structure, system, component, or part thereof necessary to assure 1) the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, 2) the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain a safe shut down condition, or 3) the capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential off-site exposures.

Deviation - A departure from the technical requirement included in a purchase order. A deviation exists when a basic component is delivered to a purchaser for use in a facility, and the basic components on the basis of evaluation, could create a substantial safety hazard.

Substantial Safety Hazard - A loss of safety function to the extent that there is a major reduction in the degree of protection provided to public health and safety.

GENERAL:

A.ý This procedure provides means for identifying, analyzing, and reporting to NRC, any newly discovered potential problems involving delivered valves, actuator control systems, and/or parts which are intended for critical applications, where the potential problems might prevent proper valve function or otherwise cause a safety hazard to the nuclear system, or to the general public. This will be accomplished by:

1. Posting informative data at Flowserve and office locations regarding the need for knowledgeable people at all levels to brng suspected problems or deviations to the attention of responsible Flowserve management personnel.

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAG DEPARMENT MANAG N-Form 36-?AE-7B. Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12f77 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE 0 Page 2 of 6

2. Identification of responsible persons to investigate all matters relating to this procedure and 1 OCFR21, in order to decide for each evaluated case whether or not the matter is "reportablen.

3. Documenting "reportable" cases according to the rules of IOCFR21 and promptly informing the Flowserve General Manager.

4. Informing the NRC according to 10CFR21 and informing other concerned parties, as directed by the General Manager of Flowserve - Raleigh.

5. Identifying which components are safety-related and specifying the need to comply to 10CFR21 on appropriate purchase orders and requisitions, where applicable.

6. Creating propedy organized files of all pertinent documents, including the transactions of the special investigative/reporting team formed to comply to this procedure.

B. The General Manager of Flowserve - Raleigh is responsible for assigning and informing appropriate persons under his management of conformance requirements to this procedure and is responsible for their conformance thereto.

C. At Flowserve the following data will be permanently posted at sites that are customarily seen by persons involved in work on nuclear products:

1. A Notice which informs all employees that it is their duty to discuss with their supervisor any suspected defect or deficiency in items covered by this procedure and to report the subject in writing to the person named in the Notice.

2. Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. (Exhibit I)

D. Copies of 10CFR21 are available in the Quality Assurance Department for review by interested individuals.

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-iB, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12112f77, Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 3of 6 PROCEDURE:

1.0 Department Responsibilities 1.1 The Manager, Inside Sales and Marketing shall:

1.1.1 Notify in writing, the Manager, Engineering and the Manager, Quality Assurance, when conformance to requirements of 10CFR21 are invoked on inquiries and customer orders.

1.1.2 Provide suitable file information for each actual order to the Manager, Quality Assurance for all pertinent matters involving IOCFR21 compliance for the reference of the 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee.

1.1.3 For all assemblies which require conformance to 10CFR21, mark each Bill of Material, or supply information when requested for incorporation into other applicable documents (e.g., Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)), to positively Identify all parts that have critical function in terms of the definitions in 10CFR21 Section 21.3.

-1.2 The Manager, Engineering shall:

1.2.1 For all assemblies which require conformance to 10CFR21, mark each Bill of Material, or supply information when requested for incorporation into other applicable documents (e.g., Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)), to positively identify all parts that have critical function in terms of the definitions in IOCFR21 Section 21.3.

1.2.2 Serve as member of the 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee.

1.3 Manufacturing Operations (Purchasing) personnel shall:

1.3.1 State in their purchase orders for critical components (as identified in the QAP) that conformance with 10CFR21 is required.

1.3.2 If problems of material procurement justify, Purchasing personnel will initiate action to obtain exemptions under Section 21.7 of 10CFR21.

1.4 The Manager, Quality Assurance shall:

1.4.1 Post "Notice, Employees on Nuclear Orders" (Exhibit II)identifying himself as the person to be notified in writing of any possible problem or noncompliance.

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER

'orm 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Effective Date 12/12/77 Raleigh, NC IRevision Date 8/25104 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 4 of 6 1.4.2 Create record files for all transactions and documents involving conformance to 10CFR21 in compliance with Section 21.5 of 10CFR21.

1.4.3 Serve as Chairman of the 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee.

1.4.4 Report evaluation to the General Manager when required.

2.0 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee 2.1 The 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee shall consist of:

2.1.1 Manager, Quality Assurance (Chairman) 2.1.2 Manager, Engineering 2.1.3 Manager, Sales & Marketing 2.2 The 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee shall:

2.2.1 Review all Safety Deviation Reports (Exhibit Ill) and/or supplier requests for evaluation of a deviation.

2.2.2 Conferon every notification of a suspected error, deviation, or other nonconformance of items for which title has been transferred to the customer which might be reportable under Section 21.21 of 10)CFR21.

2.2.3 Determine if the internal reported deviation and/or the supplier request for evaluation is a defect. When applicable, request customer assistance in the evaluations. This shall be through the Sales and Marketing Department 2.2.4 Evaluate internal and supplier deviations to determine whether they constitute defects (i.e., deviation) which would create a substantial safety hazard, and are reportable to the NRC in accordance with 10CFR21.

2.2.5 Determine whether a defect has been reported under other NRC regulations (i.e., the Technical Specifications of a Reactor Operating Ucense) and therefore is exempt from 10CFR21.

2.2.6 Determine whether the supplier, Flowserve, or the customer should report the defect to the NRC.

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER_ DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. V/04

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12/77 Revision Date 8/25104 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 5 of 6 2.2.7 Document all conversations and all transactions of the Evaluation Committee using the 10CFR21 Evaluation Committee Summary Sheet (Exhibit IV)as the file folder summary sheet.

2.2.8 When it is the unanimous opinion of the Evaluation Committee that a case is reportable, have the Manager, Quality Assurance (the Committee Chairman) notify the General Manager of Flowserve.

2.2.9 The Chairman shall prepare a written report for transmittal to the NRC by the General Manager which shall include but need not be limited to the following information:

a) Name and address of the individual or individuals informing the Commission.

b) Identification of the basic component supplied within the United States which is believed to be deficient or defective.

c) Identification of the firm supplying the basic component which is believed to be deficient or defective.

d)-. Nature of the defect or failure to comply and the safety hazard which is created or could be created by such defect or failure to comply.

e) The date on which the information regarding the deficiency or detect was transmitted to the General Manager.

f) In the case of a basic component suspected of being deficient or defective, the number and location of all such components in use at, supplied for, or being supplied for one or more facilities or activities subject to the regulations of 10CFR21.

g) The corrective action which has been, is being, or will be taken; the name of the individual or organization responsible for the action; and the length of time that has been or will be taken to complete the action.

h) Any advice related to the deficiency or defect that has been, is being, or will be given to purchasers or licensees.

3.0 Notification 3.1 Evaluation of each Safety Deviation Report to determine if there is a reportable defect or failure to comply shall be completed within sixty (60) days of discovery of the deviation.

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12/77 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE METHODS FOR REPORTING TO NRC DEFECTS CREATING PLANT INTERNAL SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 6 of 6 3.2 If the evaluation noted in 3.1 above cannot be completed within the sixty (60) day period, an interim report shall be prepared and submitted to the NRC via the General Manager of Flowserve. The report is to identify the deviation/fallure to comply being evaluated and should state when the evaluation is expected to be completed. This interim report is to be submitted to the NRC, in writing, within sixty (60) days of discovery of the deviation.

3.3 The General Manager of Flowserve shall be notified as soon as is practicable, and in all cases within five (5) working days after completion of the evaluation and determining that a defect or a failure to comply situation exists.

3.4 Ifa Safety Deviation Notice contains information which cannot be evaluated capably by Flowserve personnel and it is determined that it is better to refer it to the customer for evaluation, then the customer must be notified of the potential problem within five (5) working days of that determination.

3.5 Notification to the NRC by the General Manager of Flowserve (paragraph 2.2.9 above) shall be made once the determination that a defect or failure to comply exists which poses a substantial safety hazard. This initial notification shall be made either by FAX or by phone within two (2) days following receipt of this information by the General Manager. (Phone and FAX numbers are listed in 10CFR21.) Verification that Faxes have been received should be made by calling NRC.

3.6 Written notification to the NRC of defects shall be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of the information that such defects exists by the General Manager.

4.0 Records 4.1 Records of all evaluations of defects/failures to comply shall be retained for five (5) years after the evaluations have been completed.

4.2 Records of all correspondence related to the notification of purchasers of basic components of defects/failures to comply for a period of five (5) years after the notification.

4.3 Records of the purchasers of basic components shall be retained for a period of ten (10) years after delivery of the basic component(s).

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT I Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/1277 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE SECTION 206 OF THE ENERGY REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1974 PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I EU o CL mw- ic an' boum~ia at of W& mmdii.

mi 4pt~

a =U tatb,WIN&* datag ipuaatm aflm *=AIM "aw w~~ a Mani basot w51~i~ m p tmý Aa~ ga mauoua m"L ffsa d~a 6!boai eWgg e~xTw UUUVU

.bn inw*atrwsm wm

.ataq h1oamb~ m e m a~etasfr VLfwmm =~da~d parn"I wawaw used"mtda a~ab

• .. I IJ . I = =

APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8&M4

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT II Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Effective Date 12112177 Raleigh, NC Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES ON "N" STAMP ORDERS PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 1 PERMAMENTNOTlcE Ti Gc brkmeq*d by SeWm 2W of .L.W43hmVWritd I br Sec. 206. (a) ft vW Any cto, orm;s*nse olhada*m const.

-,t lhichesmed

%waft. oru,~ 4wlffp" wm&awrnxmb tyorschfy aemr mgtse s ed pInwrU io 3mAkmcEnm AdorS1954, wuA , m prmab h dAct. who oicis caomdonettr Ioman* achhc cyoroyaorbyc (1) blsbkcomplywIkhtlAiomineAct1G54r wmeoded cr ar ppai~e rn* mg&a5o% wder, orkei*e ofIto Caombs alrUtom ustarAW saay luwds, ar (2) cwe* anI 1*0 Wich coull a-*, mbtarbl SAMY hazard as-deftwd by ahaia *ruao regijaflo ~fck to Canmissor mso Midk naffya y Caun ind usCch ih&rbJ ory. d

=,h dsee w*=wi.uhperman & 0=4dpe ,a CIiM-h Cwmwsn has bean adequi*uy Wkamed d dmctord*lum a (b) Aryw uonrw whokAnolyaid emucbj*ay bk b l le nuaw reqhu by ubchsew (a)it tst soc~Om "h be actv b~4c poralty In am ow.t ual bi#amrwt amoua odedbySecdon 2S4 df I Abuic unw Act or 194. wnzuexida

() The mq7Wei orts" on shlmS be pImrnbunypoWd on Iu pombas dw ftc3 kawod crco -Vise rogiaud puiact b oi Abioc Ener*gA of 1Ws4, ms umende&

(d) The Comson11 utaortdodbe nd*uCh masoae Ikspecwons wad aU*er wfwcet ecO*Wm ss hmeeded I*bsum c*mr*rx eOftt ryo khiotw7ay ddeds ardefdfcats i how aidbem pwavsfuynpwed. aona ya wwvnio. wa1 up Ywr ta4ts ad " sWardelvm em tm R. A. NUKWLA., EXT. #M RONes aid A mad TWe 10. Code o Federa Reilions, Pot 21 (10CFR 21)

You can cone 10 CFR21 and our when pucefueole t mais byc*i*una:

CARAITY ASSURANC DEPARTMENT APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT III Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12112177 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE SAFETY DEVIATION REPORT (FORM NO. 36-Q-276)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I FLOWSERVE TYPICAL

&AFETYDEVATIOI REPRT W~ MANA5M QtJAUYASURNCE I sm mpftk OWhI beIm is a potiia "km at"d acmO ms an dOI~mW wdvststrawrs.and axWd possIAIyrwaa adsubnflT sfel wd.

The cvricfkbn edsts as kjAn--:

000 (No=6-ted10Wtg) e 101. Radd~k Kit 27M~ %"M SwAiSawda~dsftee PO.S. Uec K.C.273 219432-=S APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT IV Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12/77 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE 10CFR21 EVA. COMMITTEE

SUMMARY

SHEET (FORM NO. 36-Q-277)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 1 I ROWPIPA nua ft is foe I=="a" -4 f1.twlatb w"d 1W ammal se msin S~

aints y NY.a wVmt1= fm um& .

sotZZPS=. W =valves, Wd=

10 CM21 APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-TB, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT V Procedure No. 36-40-03-06 Raleigh, NC Effective Date 12/12/77 Revision Date 8/25/04 TITLE FLOW CHART PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I 1Z= aaw ma == AW is=I TB ~ j ~~611L~ te I btept~s et S.-~ I m~ -

m APPROVALS: GENERAL MANAGER DEPARMENT MANAGER Form 36-ME-7B, Rev. 8/04

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD PROCEDURE sm No.

Williamsport, Pennsylvania INSTRUCTION Page 1of 6 Designation Prepared By - Date Distnibuion Key Revision Operations JRS 5Y70 See Below T Subject Approved By -Date Review Date Efafeive Date Notification and Resolution of Abnormal Occurrences Report WAB 5178 7/2004 7/2002 1.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of this instruction is to provide for the timely notification, evaluation and resolution of all abnormal occurrences relating to Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facility.

2.0 SCOPE This instruction covers all abnormal occurrences pertaining to Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facility equipment, (hardware and software) constructed for the nuclear industry which has been delivered to the plant site.

3.0 POLICY AUTHORIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE Policy authorization originates with the General Manager of Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facility.

Reviewed - No Chianoe 5175 WAB PRiewed - No Chanue 10/93 WGK Reviewed Para 6.5: Added 6.6 1r WAB L Revised Pam, 6.2 66.1.FormOPER-1 12M95WGK Reviewýd-No Chance 67 WAR It Revid Fm heading; Paras. 1.0, -0, 3.0, 5.2, 6.1,6.2 DISTRIBUTION A. General Peision In nsiderAmonf 1DCFR21 178 WGK 6.5, 6.7.1,6.7.2, Forms OPER-1-1 and OPER-1-2 B. General Revision. ANPaoes 5/78 S N. Revised Paras. 5.1.6.6 andOPER-1-1 4197 Human Resources C. Revised Al Paoes 12/78 WGK P. Revised TieIDGervera Manager, Up4datd les, Pars.

D. Revised Paras. 5.4, 5.5,5.6,6.2, 6.3,6.8.6.9,6.10,6.11, 6.5. 6.6. 6.6.1. and 6-8 9/s WGK Paragraph 6.2 o 61. 1361.3 Reviewed - No Chanoe W/9 WGK 880 WGK R. vise Form heading IDFlowser 101200 GWi(

S. Revised 6.2; Ronitered and mvised 6.8 tb 6.9; E. Revised Pam. 4.0,6.1, 6.3, 6.7; Added Form Added new 6.8 712001 GM(

OPER-1-2 2181 W T. Revised Pa-as. 6.1 and 6.5 TK 7M2004 GWK Reviewed- No Man=e 2/82 JRS F. Revised Paa 4.0 and 6.14 V82 WQK Reviewed - No Chffe 2/83 WGK Q- Revised Pras. 5.6. 6.3. 6.5 12/84 WOK H, Revised Par 6.12 Carerted lles 12/85 WGK I. Revised Para, 6.3- Sales Mar, 1/87 WGK K. Revised Paras. 5.1 It 5.5, C1, 6.1,6.13; DSeletd LL.C 5.6 6.2. 6.5.6.9 nu 6.12 10/90W WGK

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD SPI No.

OPER-1 Williamsport, Pennsylvania PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION Page Rev.

2 T 4.0 MAJOR FORMS All abnormal occurrences shall bewritten up and reported on Form OPER-1 attached.

All abnormal occurrences shall be evaluated and documented on Form OPER-1 -2.

Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

5.0 RESPONSIBILITY 5.1 The General Manager is responsible for assuring that all facility personnel provide whatever assistance is necessary to resolve the problem.

5.2 The Contract Administration Manager is responsible for providing assistance in determining the extent of Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facilitys contractual obligations and for reporting any potential substantial safety hazard that comes to his attention.

5.3 The Quality Assurance Manager is responsible for providing any inspection or materials documentation pertaining to the problem and for reporting any potential substantial safety hazard that comes to his attention.

5.4 The Field Service Engineers are responsible for gathering all the necessary information to assist in reporting and evaluating potential substantial safety hazards reported to or discovered by them.

5.5 The Technical Director and Engineering Manager are responsible for evaluating the problem and formulating a recommended solution. They are also responsible for reporting any potential substantial safety hazard that may come to their attention. The Technical Director is also responsible for evaluating or causing to be evaluated each and every abnormal occurrence to determine if it could create a "substantial safety hazard". In addition, if it is determined that the abnormal occurrence could create a "substantial safety hazard", the Technical Director is responsible for preparing a formal notification to the NRC.

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD OPER-1 Williamsport, Pennsylvania PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION Pae.

3 T 6.0 PROCEDURE 6.1 Information pertaining to an abnormal occurrence shall be documented on Form OPER-1.

It is recognized that when the initial indication of a possible abnormal occurrence is received from a utility, specific data, facts and information may be difficult to obtain. However, without this information it may not be possible to determine that a deviation, defect or failure to comply actually exists. The notified person must use judgement on when information is adequate to issue a useful OPER-1-1. It should be issued as soon as possible but always within sixty (60) days of initial notification by the customer.

In addition to a report of trouble from the plant site, the utility, the AE or the NSS supplier, an abnormal occurrence may be identified as a result of information generated within Flowserve Corporation. Any employee possessing such information shall immediately transmit it to the Quality Assurance Manager (See CGS-5) or prepare a Form OPER-1.

6.2 Copies of completed Form OPER-1 shall be distributed as soon as possible to the following personnel:

General Manager Director Sales and Marketing Technical Manager Controller Manufacturing Manager Field Service Manager Engineering Manager Purchasing Manager Contracts Manager Quality Assurance Manager Regional Managers 6.3 Forms OPER-1 are to be numbered as follows:

EXAMPLE: W 1 (1) (2) (3)

1. The facility producing the valve (W - Williamsport).

2. The last two digits of the year in which the report was received.

3. A number controlled and assigned to each report starting with 1 and continuing sequentially for the remainder of the year. A new sequence starting with 1 shall be initiated in each succeeding year.

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD SPI No.

OPER-1 Williamsport, Pennsylvania PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION Page Pew.

4 T 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.4 In addition to the specific information needed to complete Form OPER-1 the person notified should attempt to obtain as much supplementary information as possible - such as actual operating pressure, temperature, flow, valve orientation, system in which valve is installed, purpose of the valve in the system, frequency of past operation, number of times valve has been disassembled, etc.

6.5 Upon notification of the existence of an abnormal occurrence, the Technical Director shall initiate an investigation to determine if the occurrence could create a "substantial safety hazard." All employees are directed to provide the Technical Director with whatever assistance he requests in his investigation and to regard such requests as top priority.

Ifthe evaluation concludes that a substantial safety hazard exists, the Technical Manager must notify the NRC of the problem and identify what products may be impacted and where they may be installed.

This notification shall be completed within sixty (60) days of determination that a substantial safety hazard exists. If the investigation cannot be completed within sixty (60) days the Technical Director shall prepare an interim report describing the abnormal occurrence that may be a substantial safety hazard and submit it to the NRC. This interim report shall identify when the evaluation is expected to be completed.

If the determination is positive, the Technical Director shall notify the General Manager or another responsible officer of Flowserve Corporation - VVilliamsport facility, and prepare the NRC notification.

Each abnormal occurrence report shall be evaluated and documented on Form OPER-1-2.

For each AOR that requires NRC notification the evaluation report will be distributed per paragraph 6.2. Also, for those cases in which Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facility cannot determine the safety implications the customer will be notified and advised that we have not reported under 10CFR21. This action will be noted on OPER-1-2 and distribution will be per paragraph 6.2.

The OPER-1-2 forms shall be attached to the OPER-1 forms and maintained by Tech Staff.

6.6 The Technical Director, upon determination that an abnormal occurrence may create a "substantial safety hazard" shall prepare a formal notification, obtain the concurrence of the General Manager and submit it to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission within two (2) days by FAX or telephone. Written notification shall follow within thirty (30) days.

6.6.1 The notification to the Document Control Desk, USNRC shall include, but not be limited to, the following information:

6.6.1.1 Name and address of the individual or individuals informing the Commission.

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD MNo. OE-Williamsport, Pennsylvania PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION Page Rev.

5 T 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.6.1.2 Identification of the facility, the activity, or the basic component supplied for such facility or such activity within the United States which fails to comply or contains a defect.

6.6.1.3 Identification of the firm constructing the facility or supplying the basic component which fails to comply or contains a defect.

6.6.1.4 Nature of the defect or failure to comply and the safety hazard which is created or could be created by such defect or failure to comply.

6.6.1.5 The date on which the information of such defect or failure to comply was obtained.

6.6.1.6 Inthe case of a basic component which contains a defect or fails to comply, the number and location of all such components in use at, supplied for, or being supplied for one or more facilities or activties subject to the regulations in this part.

6.6.1.7 The corrective action which has been, is being or will be taken; the name of the individual or organization responsible for the action; and the length of time that has been or will be taken to complete the action.

6.6.1.8 Any advice related to the defect or failure to comply about the facility, activity, or basic component that has been, is being, or will be given to purchasers or licensees.

6.7 The following guidelines shall be adhered to in any discussions concerning a field problem:

6.7.1 Only those personnel as directed by the General Manager, shall convey the Company position to personnel outside Flowserve Corporation - Williamsport facility.

6.7.2 No hypothesis shall be presented to anyone outside Flowserve Corporation -

Williamsport facility until a position has been established by Flowserve Corporation -

Williamsport facility management.

6.7.3 No commitment shall be made concerning field service personnel, parts, or liability, without the concurrence of the General Manager.

6.7.4 Personnel are specifically cautioned against making statements that can be construed to indicate knowledge of similar problems at other sites.

FLOWSERVE CORP. STANDARD No. OP!

OPER-1 Williamsport, Pennsylvania PROCEDURE INSTRUCTION page Rev.

6 T 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.8 Records shall be prepared and maintained as described below.

6.8.1 Reports of abnormal occurrences, from OPER-1-1, reports of evaluations, form OPER-1-2 and all supporting records and documentation shall be maintained for five (5) years after the date of OPER-1 -2.

6.8.2 Copies of correspondence to purchasers of the affected basic component shall be maintained for five (5) years after the date of OPER-1 -2.

6.8.3 Records of purchases of basic components shall be maintained for ten (10) years after delivery.

6.8.4 The Technical Manager is responsible for maintenance of the records described in 6.8.1 and 6.8.2. The Contracts Manager is responsible for maintenance of records described in 6.8.3 (ref. SS-7).

6.9 Copies of this instruction, along with Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 and IOCFR Part 21 shall be posted in a conspicuous position in the facilities.

ABW-O1-NOTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION NUMBER OF ABNORMAL OCCURRENCES DATE NAME (CALLER) POSITION COMPANY TELEPHONE NUMBER & AREA CODE PLANT SITE WHERE INSTALLED UTILITY VALVE TYPE SIZxE RATING ORIGINAL PURCHASER ORIGINAL ORDER NUMBER AND DATE ORDER NUMBER VALVE SERIAL NUMBER VALVE SERVICE DELIVERED INSTALLED PLANT CRITICAL FIRST TIME PLANT COMMERCIAL OPERATION ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE COMMENTS BY SIGNATURE -

Form OPER-1-1, Rev. N

ABNORMAL OCCURRENCE REPORT DISPOSITION AOR NUMBER DATE Evaluation of AOR Disposition By:

Action to be taken:

Form SPI-OPER-1-2, Rev. M

NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE ENERGY REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1974 SECTION 206 - Noncompliance SEC. 206 (a) ANY INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR OR RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF A FIRM CONSTRUCTING, OWNING OPERATING, OR SUPPLYING THE COMPONENTS OF ANY FACILITY OR ACTIVITY WH-ICH IS LICENSED OR OTHERWISE REGULATED PURSUANT TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954 AS AMENDED, OR PURSUANT TO THIS ACT WHO OBTAINS INFORMATION REASONABLY INDICATING THAT SUCH FACILITY OR ACTIVITY OR BASIC COMPONENTS SUPPLIED TO SUCH FACILITY OR ACTIVITY.

(1) FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED, OR ANY APPLICABLE RULE, REGULATION, ORDER OR LICENSE OF THE COMMISSION RELATING TO SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARDS OR (2) CONTAINS A DEFECT WHICH WOULD CREATE A SUBSTANTIAL SAFETY HAZARD, AS DEFINED BY REBULATIONS WHICH THE COMMISSION SHALL PROMULGATE, SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE COMMISSION OF SUCH FAILURE TO COMPLY, OR OF SUCH DEFECT, UNLESS SUCH PERSON HAS ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE THAT THE COMMISSION HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY INFORMED OF SUCH DEFECT OR FAILURE TO COMPLY.

(b) ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY AND CONSCIOUSLY FAILS TO PROVIDE THE NOTICE REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (a) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A CIVIL PENALTY IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT PROVIDED BY SECTION 234 OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED.

(c) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE PROMINENTLY POSTED ON THE PREMISES OF ANY FACILITY LICENSED OR OTHERWISE REGULATED PURSUANT TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED.

(d) THE COMMISSION IS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT SUCH REASONABLE INSPECTIONS AND OTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES AS NEEDED TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.

NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE Royited August 1g1

Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Effective Date: 10-06-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Disfon TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL lPI=RATIfhI1.P* l*%! Il FIR P~n4 1 nf 7;*

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this procedure is to provide a set of guidelines for conducting design activities in a planned, controlled and orderly manner. It describes the processing of various types of orders through the Engineering Department and the various design control measures required to ensure complete and adequate designs. This procedure addresses both high specification and commercial type design activities.

REFERENCES:

1. ANSI N45.2 Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants.

2. Appendix B to IOCFR50 Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants.

3. AEC Regulatory Standard Review Plan Section 17.1

4. Quality Assurance Manual, Flowserve Corp. - Flow Control Division

5. ISO 9001, Quality Systems, Model for quality assurance in design development, production, installation and servicing.

EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT TITLE Reference Paragraphs I Sales Order Control (SOC) Sheet (Form 36-N-13) 2.2 II SOFTRAK 5.6, 5.7 III Sales Drafting Work Order 5.1 IV Detail Drafting Work Order 5.2 V Nuclear Design Interface Control Checklist 6.3, 6.17 VI Nuclear Design Control Checklist for [N) valve 6.2 orders VII Nuclear Design Control Checklist for (NPT) 6.2 parts orders VIII Nuclear Design Verification Checklist 6.3, 7.3 IX Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) 4.5.1 Rev.

X Bill of Materials (B/M) 5.2 23 XI Design Review Board Meeting Report 7.7.2 XII Design Report Review Confirmation Form 6.8.2, 6.11 XIII Engineering QAP Input Form for N Valve Orders 4.5.2 (Form 36-E-92)

XIV Engineering QAP Input Form for NPT Parts Orders 4.5.2 (Form 36-E-89)

XV NQA-1 Design Verification Checklist 6.3, 7.5 A '

(000r'- 17 APPROVALS: &ec: <6 M~5doer. Enaineerino

Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Effective Date: 10-06-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE- Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATINfl PROCUDURE Ms.- U EXHIBIT TITLE Reference Paragraphs XVI Certification of Design For NPT Orders (Form 6.2, 6.6 36-E-93)

XVII Professional Engineer Certification Sheet (Form 6.8.1 36-E-94)

XVIII Review of Nuclear Design Specification and 6.5, 7.2.1 Rev.

Order Requirements 23 XIX Design Report Reconciliation Form 6.9.4, 10.3.2 XX Part Number/Material Change Advisement Form 4.9.1 XXI Sales Order Routing Sequence 2.3 XXII Design Plan Checklist for Sales Orders 3.1.1 XXIII Design Plan Checklist for Development Projects 3.1.1 XXIV Typical Report Documentation 6.10 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS:

AE Application Engineer ANI Authorized Nuclear Inspector ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers B/M Bill of Materials CAD Computer Aided Drafting/Design CODE ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code DRB Design Review Board ECN Engineering Change Notice (N) Valve sales order traceability code indicating requirement for Code compliance and N stamp.

N Stamp The ASME Code Stamp for valves made to Section III requirements.

NDE Non Destructive Examination (NPT) Parts sales order traceability code indicating requirement for Code compliance and NPT stamp.

NPT Stamp The ASME Code Stamp for parts made to Section III requirements.

PIOP Plant Internal Operating Procedure PNCA Part Number/Material Change Advisement Form.

P.O. Purchase Order PP Stamp The ASME Code Stamp for valve and/or pipe weldments made to Section I requirements.

QA Quality Assurance QAP Quality Assurance Plan (S) Sales order traceability code indicating a standard order with no special requirements and not requiring a QAP S.O. Sales Order SOC Sales Order Control SOFTRAK A computerized system for tracking S.O. software action items SOI Standard Operating Instruction (T) Sales order traceability code indicating a requirement for traceability at the part purchasing and/or processing level.

00041Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE 141000 Revision Date: ID-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROClIJDnRE Page 3 of 2-5 T4 A valve figure number suffix indicating that the valve conforms to all requirements of the Code except for application of the N Stamp.

T5 A valve figure number suffix indicating that the valve is Nuclear Safety Related and 10CFR21 is invoked, but ASME Section III construction is not required.

U Stamp The ASME Code Stamp for actuators made to Section VIII requirements (X) Sales order traceability code indicating a special requirement affecting assembly, test and/or shipping (Xl) Sales order traceability code used only for Cast Steel valves indicating special requirement for tagging, certifications, customer inspection, etc. for which a QAP is not required.

0"* Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE 'W*"IM0 Effective Dae: 10-08-76 R evi sio n D ate: 10-12 ..0 4 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCU1DURE Page 4 of 2q 1.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 The responsibility for the design of the product, including the Rev. selection of-materials, the implementation of design control 23 measures, and the development of the bill of materials lies with the Manager, Engineering.

1.2 Individuals specified herein are delegated the authority to review and approve design documents as designees of the Manager, Engineering.

1.3 Engineering shall be responsible for orders and inquiries as follows:

1. Valve sizes - pressure classes for which basic design layouts and calculations have not been prepared

2. New product lines requiring research, development and/or design work

3. Most cost reduction and product improvement projects.

4. P-P stamp valves

5. Main Steam and Feedwater Isolation valves for nuclear service

6. Motor operated valves (MOVs) for critical nuclear services

7. Elbow Down Valves

8. A-Actuator designs

9. Failure Analysis (weak-link) customer reports

10. Class 4500 cast steel valves 1.4 In addition, sales orders requiring eight hours or more of shop drafting should normally be sent to Engineering. Orders should not be split, unless necessary, between Engineering and Marketing to avoid inefficiencies and miscommunications.

1.5 Marketing shall be responsible for inquiries and orders not identified in 1.3 and 1.4. Appropriate approvals of layouts, ECN's and other design control procedures as described here-in must be maintained.

0"W4 Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE *'1U00 Dat:

Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUDURE Page 5 of 25 1.6 The assigned Engineer or AE has the technical responsibility for the life of a salbs order. This includes monitoring all engineering Rev. requirements, hardware and software that are required to accomplish 23 timely shipment. It is his/her responsibility to identify problems and provide timely and appropriate resolutions.

2.0 SALES ORDER ROUTING 2.1 Upon receipt of a customer order, Marketing shall classify the order by type within one of the following categories: Nuclear (N or NPT),

Traceable (T), Traceable (X), Traceable (XI), or Standard (S). A detailed description of order classification is described in Plant Internal Operating Procedure (PIOP) 36-40-13.

2.2 Marketing shall forward all orders that require Engineering review per paragraph 1.3 and 1.4 to Engineering via the Sales Order Control Sheet (SOC). For orders outside the scope of 1.3 and 1.4, the SOC shall be forwarded to the responsible AE for processing. The SOC shall consist of the Sales Order Control Sheet (Exhibit I), and any Rev. other information needed, such as customer specifications, quotes, 23 correspondence, etc. The SOC shall request the type of work required such as Bills of Material (B/M), Sales Drawings, Technical review, etc. A duplicate SOC will be forwarded to the QA Planner for review as applicable.

2.3 Engineering SOC's will be forwarded to Engineering for processing.

For new orders the Engineering Supervisor shall establish an engineering file folder by sales order number and color code as described in SOI 70-12. A routing (Exhibit XXI) shall be shown on the front of the folder designating the Engineering assignments and sequencing for the order.

2.4 Orders and related SOC's for standard category (S) valves or parts not requiring design planning per paragraph 3.0 can be processed by the Engineering Supervisor.

2.5 SOC's for existing traceable (X), (T), (N) and (NPT) orders will be forwarded to the assigned Engineer or AE for appropriate disposition.

~Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE

• Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dslon TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL I OPFRATING PROCUDURE Page 6 8f Ps 3.0 DESIGN PLANNING 3.1 As defined in 3.1.1 or 3.1.2, orders regardless of category or engineering projects requiring a major design effort shall have a design plan prepared by the Manager, Engineering or his- designee.

Nuclear orders also require the appropriate nuclear checklists. A design plan is required for:

3.1.1 New products that are to be developed and introduced into production (Exhibit XXIII).

3.1.2 Sales orders involving significant engineering content such as design modifications, stress analyses or project specific requirements (Exhibit XXII).

Standard application engineering activities, e.g., material changes, product modifications or accessories required to meet minor requirements for an order are exempt from design plans. Sales orders for parts are normally exempt from design planning.

3.2 The plan shall be prepared at the beginning of the project and shall identify those segments required to successfully complete the project.

3.3 The design plan is documented on one of two design plan checklists.

3.3.1 Design Plan Checklist for Sales Orders (Exhibit XXII) 3.3.2 Design Plan Checklist for Development Projects (Exhibit XXIII).

3.4 The personnel to be assigned to the project shall be named along with their assignments. All personnel must be technically qualified and have adequate resources to perform their task(s).

3.5 Design plans shall be kept current and updated as necessary as the design evolves, or as project requirements change.

3.6 Project schedules shall be developed for major design projects and development projects which identify each major task, the individual assigned the task, and with important milestones noted. Schedules will be updated monthly.

~Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Effectve Date. 10408-76

• e Residon Date: 10-12-04 Flow Coftrol Division TITLE: Design Contol PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUDURE Page 7 of 25 3.7 The plan shall include all design control activities required to implement the project, as identified in the relevant sections of this PIOP. Examples for sales orders include customer specification review, design input development, design report preparation, layout and sales drawing development and design verification. Each Plan will be tailored to the project requirements and may or may not include all the items in this example.

3.8 In the initial stages of a project that involves new product development, a product specification objective (PSO) shall be Rev. prepared that defines the goals to be achieved. The PSO will be 23 prepared by Engineering and requires relevant input from Marketing, Operations and Quality Assurance to assure that new designs satisfy all corporate objectives.

3.9 New product development projects shall have a product specification design (PSD) prepared that contains the basic design rules for the product line. The PSD will be developed following successful completion of the concept/prototype evaluation phases and serve as a guide for the creation of design layouts and detail drawings.

4.0 PROCESSING OF ORDERS 4.1 The assigned Engineer or AE shall be responsible for thoroughly reviewing the customer's order and specifications in a timely manner to ensure all applicable design inputs are identified and Rev. documented. The selected inputs shall be approved and controlled by 23 the Manager, Engineering or his designee. Any changes to the approved design inputs, including the reason for the changes, shall be processed in the same manner as the initial review. The Engineer or AE shall determine the need for calculations, reports, pre-drafting review, etc. They shall also ensure that all design inputs have been correctly translated into the applicable design documents.

4.1.1 In addition to the requirements of this section,"U" allstamp Nuclear (N & NPT) orders and traceable (T) orders with actuators, "PP" stamp welds, T4 or T5 suffix valves must also be subjected to the requirements of Section 6.0.

0"4,Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE 'W6*4 00 0 E Revision a 1 Da te: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPFRATING PROCUDURE Pagei B of 25 4.2 If an order requires a new design or modification to an existing design, a design layout may be required. Design layouts shall be completed by or under the supervision of a responsible designee competent in the design requirements of all applicable codes and standards. He/she shall have available and use of all applicable documented information such as the PS/D, SDP and Engineering Standards Manual, and shall apply sound engineering design practices.

4.2.1 A set of engineering design calculations shall be developed in support of the design layout when required by applicable codes and/or deemed necessary by the assigned designee. Such calculations shall analytically justify the particular design.

Calculations of all pressure containing components shall be done to show the design is safe.

4.3 Layouts for orders of the types listed in paragraph 4.1.1 shall be subjected to a formal design review per the requirements of section 7.0 of this procedure. An informal design review may be called at the discretion of the Manager, Engineering or his designee for the review and approval of layouts for orders other than those covered in paragraph 4.1.1. Informal design review meetings shall consist of individuals deemed appropriate by the responsible party. Meeting reports shall not be required for informal design reviews.

4.4 A pre-drafting design review shall be held if deemed necessary to communicate the full intent of the design to the Drafting or B/M groups. It is also for the purpose of obtaining Drafting and B/M group input into the design. The meeting will consist of the responsible designee assigned to the order, the Engineering Supervisor, a B/M representative, an Operations representative, and the Product Drafter, if assigned. Formal meeting reports shall not be required.

~Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE V*%

• M 8 0 R e vison D ate 1 0-1 2 -0 4 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPFRATIN ,PROCUDURF Pge 9 of2 4.5 Traceable Orders 4.5.1 While Traceable orders are being reviewed by the Engineer or AE, a similar process is taking place concurrently by the QA Planner for the development of the Quality.Assurance Plan (QAP) (Exhibit IX), as described in PIOP 36-40-07.

4.5.2 The assigned Engineer or AE must review the order for the required engineering information to be incorporated into the QAP and submit this information to the QA Planner.

Engineering input for (N) valve orders shall be on the QAP input form shown in Exhibit XIII. Input for (NPT) parts orders shall be on the QAP input form shown in Exhibit XIV.

Input for other traceable orders may be on other forms as appropriate.

4.6 A copy of the QAP input, any special B/M and Drafting instructions or other pertinent information shall be inserted into the order folder. The folder shall then be forwarded to the next station indicated on its routing.

Rev.

23 4.7 Upon completion of the QAP, it must be approved by the Manager, QA or his designee and by the Manager, Engineering or his designee. In the case of orders processed in Marketing, the AE must approve the QAP after it is approved by QA. When possible, the QAP should be reviewed and approved by the Engineer or AE who made the original QAP input.

4.8 If the order includes an actuator purchased from an outside agency, an Actuator Specification Sheet shall be prepared by the Engineering or AE group. The Specification Sheet shall be checked and approved by a qualified individual other than the preparer. Actuator Specification Sheets shall be issued and controlled in accordance with PIOP 36-70-06. The responsible Engineer or AE shall be notified if there are any changes in the specified actuator that would impact drafting work and B/M's.

4.9 An effective interface with the customer is essential in order to convey and receive meaningful information. The primary means of communication concerning the valve design is the sales drawings.

These drawings are prepared for an individual customer to convey interface information, such as weight, outline dimensions, flow characteristics, quantities of parts, types of material, NDE, pressure ratings, electrical connections, etc.

4.9.1 If parts supplied for a parts order differ from the customer P.O. in either part number or material, a Part Number/Material Change Advisement form (Exhibit XX) or equivalent will be completed by the assigned Engineer or AE. This information shall be submitted by Marketing to the customer.

00"*1Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE MW00 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE~Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPFRATING PROCUDURE Page 1Oof 25 4.9.2 Other documents such as design calculations, Design Reports, seismic calculations, test procedures, and method specifications are also submitted when required by the customer order or specification.

4.10 Customer approvals of documents shall be maintained in the Order Files. Obtaining the customer approvals shall be the responsibility of the Sales & Marketing Group.

5.0 BILLS OF MATERIAL AND DRAWINGS Upon receipt of the SOC folder, the Engineering Supervisor, AE or Rev..

23 1 5.1 designee shall schedule B/M's and drawings. They shall also prepare, as applicable, the Sales Drafting work orders (Exhibit III).

5.2 For orders sent to Engineering, the assigned B/M writer shall begin to generate a Bill of Materials (Exhibit X), and shall prepare detail drawing work orders (Exhibit IV) as necessary. A description of the B/M development and issue process is contained in PIOP 36 10.

5.2.1 In cases of new designs, the B/M is dependent on the release of the design layout which is the basic drawing from which all of the product detail drawings and the B/M are derived. For orders where delivery requirements do not allow completion of all layouts and drawings before placing long lead time raw materials on order, a partial B/M may be issued. In this case, the Engineer shall work closely with the Engineering Supervisor to ensure that the proper requirements are specified by the partial B/M.

5.2.2 B/M's for traceable orders will not normally be issued in partial or final form until the QAP has been issued. For short lead time orders a partial B/M can be generated based on the Engineering QAP input prior to QAP issue. In such cases care must be exercised to assure that the finalEB/H is complete and per the QAP.

5.3 Standard and X traceable B/M's shall be reviewed and approved by an individual other than who originally prepared the B/M. Bills written in Marketing shall also be approved by either the Engineering Supervisor or the Product Design Manager.

5.4 B/M's for traceable MT), (N), and (NPT).orders and B/M's for new designs or extensive modification to existing designs shall be approved by the Manager, Engineering or his designee and the QA Planner who developed the QAP. The B/M shall be initialed and dated by each individual prior to issue.

0Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE '40 Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Contml Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPIRATING PROCUDIRE Page 1I of 25 5.5 Once the design layout has been approved (see para. 7.8), the product detail and assembly drawings are generated. The product detail drawings are the basic production shop drawings required to manufacture the various valve parts.

5.5.1 Upon receipt of a Product Detail Work Order, the Engineering Supervisor assigns the task to a Drafter. Upon completion of the detail drawings, they are checked, approved and issued.

5.6 Upon completion of the B/M, either in final or partial form, the B/M Editor shall input the information into SOFTRAK (Exhibit II).

5.7 Upon completion of the assembly drawings and/or weld end details, a transmittal form shall be prepared for the drawings. The submittal packages shall then be submitted to the customer and a submittal entry made in SOFTRAK (Exhibit II).

5.8 New drawings having the appropriate approval signatures shall be issued by the Engineering print room in accordance with PIOP 36-70-06. All drawings shall be stored and controlled by the print room personnel. Procurement of drawings is described in SOI 70-15.

Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control DMsion TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING

...... mmm* ..........PROCt1DUREmiI WEE U rC2',J;:*

Ul JLf-.

r-*;J 6.0 SPECIAL PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR AND HIGH SPEC TRACEABLE ORDERS 6.1 The requirements of this section must be applied as appropriate to all Nuclear (N & NPT), and all traceable (T) orders for "U" stamp actuators, "PP" stamp welds, and T4 or T5 suffix valves. It does not apply to other (T) orders.

6.2 Except for the provisions contained in 6.3, 6.5 and 6.6, the Manager, Engineering or responsible designee shall establish a Rev, nuclear design control checklist for each sales order line item for (N) valves (Exhibit VI). For NPT parts orders a design control checklist (Exhibit VII) shall be generated for valves larger than size 4 unless the following is applicable:

6.2.1 The part is a direct replacement 6.2.2 The only change is the Code Edition/Addenda or a material change that requires no modification of the design.

If the criteria listed in 6.2.1 or 6.2.2 applies, a Certification of Design for NPT Orders (Exhibit XVI) shall be completed and attached to the order folder.

6.3 A design control checklist (Exhibits V through VIII and XV) shall be established, as required, for (N) or (NPT) line items for valves size 4 and smaller if one or more of the following conditions exist:

a) A new valve design layout is required.

b) New design calculations are required.

c) NQA-1 is invoked and the valve design has not been verified.

d) Interface between outside consulting services is required.

If none of the above applies refer to paragraphs 6.5 and 6.6.

6.4 The nuclear design control checklist shall be completed by the individuals denoted. The appropriate individual shall circle "Y" for (yes, completed), "N/A" for not applicable, and "A" for action required. When items are checked "A" requiring an action to be completed, the "Y" for yes shall also be circled at the completion of all work required to satisfy the requirement. At the end of the order, the checklist for each valve/part line item shall be reviewed and all items must have a "Y" or "N/A" circled. The checklist shall be attached to the engineering file folder inside cover by metal tabs or staples.

0"441Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVEUM qV44 0 Ec Re D:

V isio n D a t e:1 0-1 2-0 4 Flow Control DMsron

'TTLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUDURE Page 13 of 25 6.5 Valve orders size 4 and smaller which do not require a checklist per paragraph 6.3 shall have a Nuclear Design Specification Review Sheet (Exhibit XVIII) completed and attached to the order folder.

6.6 Parts orders for size 4 and smaller valves that are outside the scope of paragraph 6.3 shall have a Certification of Design for NPT Orders (Exhibit XVI) completed and attached to the order folder.

6.7 Code Design Reports 6.7.1 Design reports must be prepared in accordance with the Code of reference specified in the customer's P.O. or Certified Design Specification. Design reports shall be prepared when specified in the customer P.O. or as follows.

6.7.2 For Code of Reference prior to Summer 1978 Addenda:

Rev. a) All Class 1 valves require design reports.

23 b) Certification (BE Seal) per paragraph 6.8 for design reports is required, and submittal to the customer per paragraph 6.8.2.

6.7.3 For Code of Reference Summer 1978 Addenda upto but not including the Winter 1982 Addenda:

a) All Class 1, 2 and 3 valves require design reports.

b) Certification (PE Seal), per paragraph 6.8, is required for Class 1 reports and Class 2 and 3 reports when designed to service loadings greater than design loadings.

c) Customer submittal and review per paragraphs 6.8 and 6.11 is required prior to stamping for all Class 1 reports, and Class 2 and 3 when designed to service loadings greater than design loadings.

~Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE NW00 E o:

Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control DMsion TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL I OPERATING PROCUOURF Page 14 of 25 6.7.4 For Code of Reference Summer 1982 Addenda upto the present:

a) All Class 1, 2 and 3 valves require design reports.

b) Certification (PE Seal) and Customer submittal, Rev. per paragraph 6.8, is required for Class 1 reports 23 and Class 2 and 3 reports when designed to service loadings greater than design loadings.

c) Customer submittal and review per paragraph 6.11 is required for all reports prior to stamping.

6.8 Certified Design Reports shall be prepared as follows:

6.8.1 When a Certified Design Report is required, the report shall be prepared under the direction of a Registered Professional Engineer other than the one who certified the Design Specification. Upon completion, it shall be checked by a qualified individual under the direction of the Registered Professional Engineer. The Registered Professional Engineer shall seal and certify the certification sheet (Exhibit XVII) upon satisfactory review and approval. The Registered Professional Engineer shall be qualified to certify Design Reports in accordance with SOI 70-23.

6.8.2 Certified Design Reports shall be submitted to the customer, along with a Design Report Review Certification Form (Exhibit XII). The customer shall review the report for compliance with the applicable Design Specification per the Code. After review, the customer is to complete the certification form, or a substitute form of his, which is then returned to Flowserve and filed with the original Certified Design Report. It must be made available to the ANI prior to stamping the valve.

Ow",Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Nfteo Dat:

Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPFRATINQ PROCUDURF Pa;ga 1 ef nf 6.9 Design Reports must meet the requirements listed below:

6.9.1 Be reviewed by someone other than the originator, and signed by the originator, the reviewer, and the approver.

6.9.2 Must reference the applicable Bill of Material number including the issue date and, except as permitted in paragraph Rev. 6.9.6, the applicable Sales/Assembly Drawing number including 23 the revision level that were used in the preparation of the report.

6.9.3 Must reference the applicable layout number and revision level that was used in the preparation of the report.

6.9.4 If required by 10.3, a Design Report Reconciliation Form (Exhibit XIX) shall be attached to the inside back cover of the file copy 6.9.5 Must have all pages numbered consecutively.

6.9.6 If the design report does not reference the Sales/Assembly Drawing number and revision level, the Sales/Assembly Drawing must reference the Design Report number and revision level.

6.9.7 When Design Report results are based on computer calculations for which verification reports are required per SOI 70-38, the Design Report shall identify the computer (make, model and serial number) used to perform the calculations. The calculations shall have been performed by the same computer used to perform the verification problems. Reference to the verification document shall be provided in the Report, along with the bases (or reference thereto) supporting application of the computer program to the specific physical problem, per SOI70-38.

6.9.8 Regardless of the Code of Reference, if the requirements of paragraph 6.10 are met, the issue date of the Bill of Material Rev. and the Sales/Assembly Drawing revision level are not 23 required. If the Design Report number is referenced on the Sales/Assembly Drawing (paragraph 6.9.6), the'Design Report revision level is not required.

00**1.Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE

• e Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Divison TITLE. Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCGDURE Page 16 of 25 6.10 Design Reports where the code of reference is Summer 1978 and later, in addition to 6.9, require the following: (Typical example is shown in Exhibit XXIV.)

6.10.1 Include an objective of the report.

6.10.2 Identify the design inputs including but not limited to the design specification number and revision, the design conditions, and code and addenda of reference.

6.10.3 Identify the design source)s) e.g., the customer purchase order number.

6.10.4 Include the results of any literature searches or other background information.

6.10.5 List all assumptions, if any, and indicate any that must be verified as the design proceeds.

6.10.6 List the machining drawing numbers and revisions of all pressure retaining components used during fabrication as well as their RMC numbers and ASME/ASTM specification numbers.

6.11 When customer submittal of Code design reports is required, a Design Report Confirmation Form (Exhibit XII) shall be included. The confirmation form, or its equivalent, is to be returned to Flowserve and filed with the Design Report. It must be made available to the ANI prior to stamping the valve.

6.12 The Engineer shall review the order for the applicability of federal laws 10CFR21 and 10CFR5O. The Engineer shall identify any parts affected and include this information in the QAP input for incorporation into the QAP. A detailed description of this process is provided in SOI 70-14.

6.12.1 Individuals who have knowledge of any potential problems in nuclear valves or parts that have been shipped from this plant which could constitute a safety hazard as defined shall prepare a safety deviation report (form 36-Q-276). This form shall be submitted to the Manager, Quality Assurance for review. A detailed description of this process is provided in PIOP 36-40-03. A copy of this form and all pertinent correspondence concerning its resolution shall be maintained in Engineering file 35-04.

6.13 Product detail drawings must be approved by the individual responsible for the original design, and the Manager, Engineering, Engineering Supervisor or their designees.

OwotlPoeueNo.367032 FLOWSERVE Effective Date: 10-08-76 Nft-wý Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUDURE Pnge 17 of 2-6.14 Sales/Assembly drawings for (S), (X), and (T) orders must be approved by the Engineering Supervisor or AE.

6.15 Sales/Assembly drawings for (N), (NPT), (U), (PP), (T4) and (T5) orders must be signed by the responsible Engineer, Product Design Supervisor, Manager, Engineering and Manager, Quality Assurance.

Rev.

23 Previously approved Sales/Assembly drawings that have been transferred to Raleigh Design Control from a facility which had an approved ASME QA Program and a Valid ASHE N-Stamp Authorization are exempt from the above requirements. If resubmittal of these drawings-is required, then the above requirements shall be met.

6.16 All Engineering procedures, specifications, Stress Reports and check lists which pertain to items intended for Code compliance shall be available for review by the ANI.

6.17 If an order requires interface with an outside design organization, such as outside consulting firms or vendors supplying complex parts, the interface control requirements of section 9.0 of this procedure shall be met, and the interface control checklist (Exhibit V) shall be attached to the order folder and completed.

7.0 DESIGN VERIFICATION 7.1 Design verification is the process of demonstrating that a finished valve design satisfies the customer design requirements. Design Verification is accomplished through Design Reviews, review of design documents prior to release to the customer, use of alternate design calculations or by the performance of a suitable testing program.

omf* Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE q % S, W0 0

• EfcieDt:1-87 R ev i sion Date -1 0 -1 2-04 Row Control D*vsion TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL I OPERATING PROCUDURE Page 18 of 25 7.2 Nuclear Valve & Parts Design Verification Designs shall be verified for each application regardless of the degree of standardization or similarity of previously proven designs.

7.2-.1 Valve Orders The assigned Engineer shall review the design, and as a minimum for valve orders intended for Nuclear Code compliance, the Certified Design Specification shall be reviewed to ensure that the specifications meet all the applicable design requirements of the ASME Code,Section III, Division 1. The cover page of each Design Specification shall be signed and dated by the assigned Project Engineer, or a Nuclear Design Specification Review Sheet (Exhibit XVIII) completed and attached to the order folder, indicating such review has been completed. The Certified Design Specification must contain the following items:

a) Functions and boundaries of items covered.

b) Design requirements, including overpressure protection c) Environmental conditions, including radiation d) Code Class (1, 2 or 3) e) Material requirements, including impact tests f) Operation requirements (when applicable) g) Code Edition and Addenda (W'77 or later) h) Code Cases (if applicable) 7.2.2 Parts Orders Review of nuclear parts (NPT) orders shall include verification that the customer's Certified Design Specification and the Code Edition and Addenda referenced in the purchase order are identical to those for the original valve order. If not, all differences must be resolved either by obtaining a revision to the P.O. or by determining that they are acceptable.

0"%"Procedure No. 36-70-.03-24 FLOWSERVE IN44 00 0 Revision D ate: 10-12 -0 4

Flow Control DMsfon TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL. I OPERATING PROCUDURE Page 19 of 29 7.2.3 In addition, the material intended for use in the parts order Rev. shall be compared to the original material for the valve 23 order. Any differences shall be evaluated by the Manager, Engineering or his designee to determine material acceptability for both the application and the customer.

7.3 Formal Design Verification If any one of the criteria given in paragraphs 7.3.1 - 7.3.5 below apply to an (N) valve or (NPT) parts order, a formal design verification is required, all requirements of section 7.0 of this procedure must be applied to the order, and the design verification checklist (Exhibit VIII) must be attached to the order folder and completed.

7.3.1 A new design or revised design layout is required or an existing layout is utilized which has not previously been subjected to a formal review. (A previously reviewed valve must have had a Design Review conducted by a DRB, meeting minutes filed, and all the requirements of this PIOP satisfied.)

7.3.2 A revision to a previously reviewed layout is required due to changes in the design of pressure boundary parts or critical to function parts.

7.3.3 A Code Edition, Addenda or Class is specified which differs from those covered by the original design review and require a Rev. modification in the design.

23 7.3.4 The materials utilized for pressure boundary parts (including the stem for Class I valves larger than size 4) differ from those covered by the original design review and require a modification in the design.

7.3.5 Materials are utilized for critical (essential to function) parts which have inferior chemistry or mechanical properties to those covered by the original review.

7.4 If a formal design verification is not required in accordance with the criteria of section 7.3, this will be documented on the check list or on the certification forms required by paragraph 6.2, 6.5 or Rev. 6.6.

14

o l% Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE

• Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPFRATING PROCUDURE page 20 nf 25 7.5 When NQA-1 design verification is required by Code Edition, or specifically invoked by the purchase order, the Manager, Engineering or his designee shall assign design verification to an Engineer other than the one who performed the original design. This design verification shall be complete and thorough, and as a minimum documented to the extent delineated in the checklist for NQA-1 design verification (Exhibit XV). The checklist shall be attached to the order folder and completed.

7.6 Engineering calculations, equipment purchase specifications, instruction manuals, computer input and related documents as described in SOI 70-10-shall be checked by a qualified individual other than the preparer. The documents shall be assigned a specific control number and shall be subject to revision control as described in Section 9.0 of this procedure.

7.6.1 Calculations shall be prepared, checked and approved as described in SOI 70-10. All reports shall be well organized and detailed as to purpose, assumptions made, methods of analysis, design inputs, references and units, so that a qualified person can review, understand and verify results without recourse to the originator.

7.6.2 Nuclear (N) orders shall have, as a minimum, a set of minimum wall calculations of the body. Code design reports are required per 6.7. Orders with "U" stamp actuators and orders with "PP" stamp valve/pipe weldments shall have a set a minimum wall calculations.

7.6.3 Additionally, for valves larger than 4", a stress analysis of all pressure retaining parts shall be made verifying that these parts are within Code allowable stress limits. The stem shall also be analyzed for Class 1 nuclear valves larger than size 4, or if required by the customer P.O. or design specification.

7.6.4 Calculations other than those required by the Code should be made at the discretion of the Manager, Engineering or his designee. Such calculations shall meet the checking and approval requirements of SOI 70-10.

Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE q M Effecive Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dsion TITLE Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUIDURE Page 21 of 25 7.7 The design layout'review can be used as an effective design control measure to ensure the adequacy of a particular design. The design layout review for nuclear, high spec traceable orders and new valve design of all categories, shall be conducted by a Design Review Board (DRB). Other categories do not require DRB.

7.7.1 The Design Review Board (DRB) shall consist of a chairman, an administrator and reviewer. The Chairman shall be the Manager, Engineering or his designee. The Chairman shall be responsible for conducting the design layout review and assuring that definitive conclusions are reached or action items assigned. The reviewers shall consist of the Manager, Engineering, Manager, Quality Assurance, Manager, Operations or their respective designees, and any other members deemed necessary by the Chairman. The Engineer or AE responsible for the design shall present the overall design concept and answer any questions posed by the DRB.

7.7.2 The DRB Chairman shall appoint a DRB Administrator who shall be an Engineer other than the person who conceived the original design. The Administrator shall set up the meeting and document the meeting minutes in the DRB report (Exhibit XI) at the direction of the DRB Chairman. Subsequent DRB meetings shall be called if required until the members of the DRB are satisfied with the adequacy of the design. The meeting reports shall be distributed to all individuals on the DRB and to the Engineer or AE responsible for the design. The original of the meeting report shall be filed under the valve type and layout number per SOI 70-11.

7.8 Design layouts shall be signed by the individual who made the drawings, the Engineering Design Manager and/or the Engineer responsible for the design, and the Manager, Engineering.

7.8.1 For N, NPT and T4 orders, in addition the Manager, Quality Assurance shall sign the layout, or his designee.

7.9 In those cases where the adequacy of a design is to be verified by test, the Engineer responsible shall develop a test plan. The results of the test shall be summarized in a formal report and assigned a control number. These reports shall be checked by another Engineer and approved by the Manager, Engineering or his designee.

7.10 If the design process and verification procedures themselves are the cause for any design revisions, then these procedures shall be reviewed and revised as necessary.

• " Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE

• Revision Dat:

Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATINGF PROCUUEPag 2 of 25 8.0 DESIGN VALIDATION 8.1 Design validation is the process of demonstrating that a finished valve assembly operates as designed, and is normally performed on completed valve assemblies by testing. Examples of Design Validation include hydrostatic testing and functional testing at actual field conditions where practical.

8.2 Design Validation is typically accomplished by any of the following:

8.2.1 Testing to the appropriate standards as those established by organizations such as ASME, MSS or ANSI.

8.2.2 Testing in accordance with Method Specifications written to validate operation of other valve features.

8.2.3 Actual in service monitoring of product performance shall be addressed by the Complaint Report System.

9.0 DESIGN INTERFACE CONTROL 9.1 The design control center for all valve designs is the Raleigh Engineering Department. Interface design organizations are those such as consulting firms and vendors.

9.2 Except for the provisions contained in 9.3, when layouts and design calculations are transferred to Raleigh design control, the designs shall be subjected to a formal design verification per the requirements of section 7.0 of this procedure.

9.2.1 Layouts shall be assigned a Raleigh control drawing number if the original number does not comply with Raleigh policy.

Calculation documents shall be kept on file in the Raleigh Engineering Department.

9.2.2 All layouts and documents shall be approved in accordance with this procedure prior to use.

Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE q% Ao o o Ec R e vis ion D ate : 1 0 04 Flow Control Dision TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUOURE Page 23 of 25 9.3 "N" or "NPT" orders involving an existing design from a facility which had an approved ASME QA program and held a valid ASME stamp authorization may be processed and shipped from the Raleigh facility without the need for a Layout, Design Review or Design Verification providing the following restrictions and requirements are met.

a) A final B/M must have been released under the original system or a new B/M must be issued that duplicates the requirements of the original B/M.

b) A copy of the B/M and all applicable engineering documents must be available for review and use.

c) A QAP shall be developed, reviewed and approved as outlined in.

section 4.0 of this procedure. It shall be used to identify and control the special requirements necessary for compliance with customer and Code requirements.

d) Approval of the QAP shall document that the proper reviews have been made and that the design is acceptable.

9.4 Outside consulting firms that prepare reports, analyses and studies for Flowserve which effect the valve design shall be controlled by the implementation of suitable design control measures. These measures shall be invoked through the use of engineering specifications which clearly define the job requirements. These specifications shall be checked, approved and a control number assigned per SOI 70-10. Documents, reports, studies, etc., done by outside consulting firms shall be reviewed and approved prior to acceptance by the Manager, Engineering or his designee.

9.5 Vendors which supply components that effect the overall valve design and performance shall be controlled by the implementation of suitable design control measures. These measures shall be invoked through the use of engineering specifications which clearly define the job requirements. A control number shall be assigned to each specification. Vendor's documents shall be reviewed and approved, prior to acceptance of the equipment design, by the*Manager, Engineering and Manager, Quality Assurance or his designee, when applicable.

000041" Procedure No. 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE INISOV0 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division MTLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCUnURE Page 24 of 25 10.0 ENGINEERING DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL 10.1 It is the intent of this procedure that design changes be reviewed and approved by the individuals who performed the original design, review and approval.

10.2 In the event that it is not practical for the original individuals to perform the required review and approval of revisions, other responsible individuals may be designated by the Manager, Engineering provided the individuals have access to pertinent background information, have demonstrated competence in the specific design area of interest, and have adequate understanding of the requirements and intent of the original design.

10.3 Revision of design layouts, product detail drawings, bills of material and sales drawings shall be controlled by ECN's in accordance with PIOP 36-70-02. In cases where the sales drawing is affected by the ECN, the Engineer or AE shall receive a copy of the approved ECN immediately following its approval and shall then issue a sales drawing work order documenting the changes required.

10.3.1 All ECN's issued for "N" or "NPT" order documents (N or NPT is checked in the code stamp block) must be reviewed for impact on the Design Report (if applicable). This review will be documented by the Engineer's checking the appropriate block on the ECN: "Yes" should be checked if the ECN is for a part covered in the Design Report. If the part is not covered in the Design Report, or if there is no Design Report, "No" should be checked. The Engineer will then sign the Design Report Section as verification of the review.

10.3.2 If "Yes" is checked, then an entry must be made on the Design Report Reconciliation Form (Exhibit XIX), which is to be attached to the Design Report. The Design Report shall be revised and resubmitted when the reconciliation indicates such revision is required.

10.4 Revision of B/M's shall be in accordance with PIOP's 36-70-02 and 36-70-04.

10.5 Revisions to other engineering design documents shall be made in accordance with SOI 70-10. Certified Design Report revisions shall be approved by a Registered Professional Engineer. A detailed description of the revision process is described in SOI 70-10.

10.6 Revisions to QAP's shall be in accordance with PIOP 36-40-07.

~Proceure No. 36-70-.03-24 FLOWSERVE

• e Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Disaon TITLE: Design Control PLANT INTERNAL I OPERATING PROCIj IURE Page 25 of 25 11.0 RETENTION AND DISPOSITION OF ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS 11.1 Control of the retention and disposition of engineering documents is necessary in. order to maintain an accurate history of a particular valve design. Control measures shall be implemented for the proper collection, filing, storing, maintaining and disposing of engineering documents.

11.2 The retention and disposition of the engineering sales order file documents shall be as described in SOI 70-12.

11.3 The retention and disposition of other engineering design documents shall be as described in SOI 70-11.

11.4 Transfer of engineering records to storage facilities shall be in accordance with PIOP's 36-30-05, 36-30-06 and 36-40-16.

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. I Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dnnsion TITLE: SALES ORDER CONTROL (SOC) SHEET (FORM 36-N-13)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I

Order . . ;.,

Sft: Cullomet po#lU, CUST 4: Cultomel N.Mne m priOB9 T78D 10211iib40 1' ý'

m Ie oz 0

• .JCUSTQMERASSDWIG i~'~4j

~~ ~'jUOMITTED FOR REC~ORD. .

030 to il

O "% Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE q='v lunw'o e EXHIBIT NO. III Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision D ate: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Sales Drafting Work Order PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I aap. aa=

grZ.

Pra

-- 411 MOM~v*

Nov ~A ~~

ISAT~ PF J_

4L.-t..M ~. ¶L¶~-

,SS =r sat

.64 40" 3L4. - - __ ____ ____ __ 4 U-1 -6 AAIM 11109

-. ~ V- V ~ ~ ~ lq ..

talli.

WMM-r L 5-..

PIT-

.YQ-4t_________

A ~~v4Tw 4.0 Wrid W.-~ IW -

FLOWSERVE MMow Cont Divsimon PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of DRAWt~eGRK ~DE~ST

- M.- . -

lm ~

w*. w--.z 7-~

7

-4 Z W-I-

z -or -

.1z

. p 1

~~44~~t~~?1  ?~~ 11~'¶-

f~ 4T - -k4~

ri4,

~~4~

I ý0k 0-t L.

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. V Effecli*v Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TTLE: Nuclear Design Interface Control Checklist PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I Mc iEAR INTSFACES I.:

" *' i , . ,. : . , . ,. . ... . .... ..

LI IUAR .;t~a~L VW'l R Oh ESGMV AaA~ I4As MAWROvAVO52w amI YO=2 wMkIFJC3CAFEDm~ =Ti 1)wEatO ug

• .4. HAVE b.2o*. *g*.o C1REV.A Em, kA~ 3*aAo5OV1(~~MA ~ Y-HI DWM]ANOM A'~lEI MVtMSAW* WMOO~

lTJI4 m~u,:t wm~tIq WhOAUI MANAPIVPSY*r

i*W

___Wm,. CHLVwowUIYW TN!~ .. a

• D-- n v*A**t MMA ;R- Yl WA ,Al m3" .. .. " " .

MO.. W

... - - f'G Tic1 V=i. ratWVr . R w* . - rr rsuwinwn U* 5w -

£~rcs~~

FL ERW EEXHIBIT NO. VI Effective Date: 10-08-76 Flow Control Divsion TITLE: Nuclear Design Control Checklist for (N) valve orders PLANT INTERNAL ________________________

OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of 2 A). OE S0CPOt.

IN' W=1(A 72A M-6-A- *WRML YWA

-"JIM

- ~fA

~~~'~~ e .k~ a o i

........ t n Jam.~ !0= WWMMMA

~ - -) -' YVI A 0A, A.

LS* .. *J.MI owF V WL A V. A.:I At4' WA: X W ...

I S' R! ~ 4A WSWI~ ~ A ~ Wi ~ -

AIWP~.

464 -Aid r. -

• 4,

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. Vi Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dision TITLE: Nuclear Design Control Checidist for (N) valve orders PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 2 of 2

,ju&i~sieu ~ vM~VEom~IS

-' ~ -lift 4=:. A= EATMAETrOKOF VTIDatd

• V Fbl- am~~'~o~

tv P. CV-

%44 pm~bDAM MHL~PTLrmPo h' Y *A AL itI~MISI0za . VA0M9V15SY1SOS?

V W* AL&

'3Avs~sT 'ZALM mm~wPo

• A" PAbrEID

-- ~~ ~~~~f ~i7-D~ W~1-O3 0hr..YW RM MM,7.I A Cm~

I i-wA~V I M. NXF k 1VfA~~W~*

xT3Ef OE AW Y.

AC 1A 12Wý tS5" M '

FAV AMpT T~1 2O~e~yi

• *qbProcedure No.: 36..70-03-24 FLOWSERVE Nf o EXHIBIT NO. VII Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Nuclear Design Control Checklist for (NPT) parts orders PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 2 j:6wt SG~ ~*~ H0UTSOt RTPRS I4 u... .... J ...... o *i .

LIS :C= AmSS V~w A.

~U.2 ~~M~~fUKZ CA W0~#~@~ A.

-. ~~m~f Vww IC56 AR~1E8 UW t~ ~ A rI~ %.O 24~~A VASVM  : SM*,-GaAI~~dO

.tst MM& VM ~ I~

• AMCW0 L-M -W MWWA WW C= CZ .- w , $4nV W06 A&

-u E~x CCU iiA 4

• ~ ~ ~sJ I!~-* ~ ~ i~M.~)ii*

MW ii os~

WITe ~ -TA L*.t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~44

~ ~!~~ ~ ~ l~ w M.u!~*OA'BOIf~t~S

-' Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. VII Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Nuclear Design Control Checklist for (NPT) parts orders PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 2 of 2 1UWAS IL K~S-c~ ~7 Pft OfA QfýMA1IACM -0 9.' ~~~~~~

Aivisii~o ~nA ~--M A~~

aWJob *DVO= m-a (K BN Y-lI T tX!& LSTf~ 6.SAO'5 OL!WWAA

• -A

...... P: -m~m~~m~I oJss$

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. \111I Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Nuclear Design Verification Checklist PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I LEAR D~1GN V R~&T1~~4 cOL~H~ICI4T t*

W-CSCFF.

M.=- MU V 7.7.2 ~sN - 4 ~ ~ wb ~4 TIMUVA 7.7. ITffGU~Nm~U~

T! D7)~~fl~I~~UT! M C ~O*w~r MA2 V A:

-V IVA A ro.f!0 %o L _ __ _ _ _ . . -

_W.AnA.oM.A. It. !

Z.,rs

FLOWSERVE EXIIN.I___ cie ae 1-87 Flow Control Division TrLtE: Qualfty Assurance Plan (QAP)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I

-7.7 17 ~ E BY: CM3 If10 cSm.ER VM TELATWI-ICmf TN~L# ECRI

~AMO -1.-478 Rair.. 0 Kda~ik..Y m

M) M.!-S11t bndr M~t.'

it18t -0 2 S p 4

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. X Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Bill of Materials (B/M)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I PA PVFV 4~ if"u sagz".t l ft" I

- E.E ........ .. . . .. .-.. .... ;. -: .~. . . . . . .

• ~~~~~. ~ T3 t iiv I3I~VO ........ -. ------

1...238."

.x~ Q=1l 0 4= taOxf t.WDOM3 Ih XSSILW-72 I * ý 6Siammya Wisir CWSMUi Wi 1'"00O ft 502M A-3072421 3=-x I ~ ~ J.

~a~l422~Ja~axm.~-2.

~ ~

fli) x£

&AWNrna~

.300 1,000M-0

~S -I~ a=-;@tn.s 0.1.M W-;-M I  ;

sime*t 4p 41) 24.404 W

• Natl. 0.1 caffit3 mb4).:

velt4 ms*

A=

&MumTrz S'.&,

Procedure No.: 36-70-.03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. Al "Effiective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dvsion "i'JTLE: Design Review Board Meeting Report PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I FLOWSERVE GOMM"EM DoikhRW FL~

=2i 9,)15A3 TAR WPA A ADJOMR REPORTED WZYE. T.Ggalmztb mtsmp. 8. Lamms R.A SanddbAma & C.Maon- E T Graham tAYWftNO, KK44Q-*MRWVD O'CRDERI4O EAD 1..Z-~

FLXVSERVE M.,3

-.0P"NPýWWRCATMO CPWES4W0B7 Re~v2 pfpSUREýA:CAS 3.00 WiAR -ýrr W tote icrephiM-le Aopvs~

ftenwaothdahmI

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XIl Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Report Review Confirmation Form PLANT INTERNAL Page I of I OPERATING PROCEDURE WEiG R.E TEE DCMNTT Valve :zez41ortfPrxere V*ve id li~ 645B89 12 ReUM408 OVS Oltff6MOPOW4ER-GE? R&I1ON lif.fet-Ddowesrls.~~k. ~e~

bsdIC60 ~Wkbe~sgn apio wt 6

.(fls*=~nei*.W= be comet ed andit~u:e t EWai avsiirt ales~

ft COSOPSOM 5o 1,1 tr;Mtmmtýmpbtlýttt~~a In

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. )(111 Effective Date:" 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dision TITLE: Engineering QAP Input Form for Valve Orders (Form 36-E-92)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I

~NGU~JEERM QfNPCJ-T:VALVES

. - _. = mm w, .- ' , ."

rgn SR O:.: No-. : . F3...:____._____

Newba Code ______ _______ae rwn__________

Atiat od~ye. CO Cs CDm ~~_______

Dtui TySpe-. dP.i ,Rev. . ,

.".-,s ..'.....

R L : Rer.... Cet.

. . v- .b ..St. R-.g.f.. .

~ fFev.  : Rr~ ce. lk O E.'L L s .-W:

sure:Retaining ats _ _ _Clca as _ _ _

sume RPC Mi.1*.tom hcaPrtNn IO Com

ttMO WnWL 06i0IJ PjWmipRc o L MrJIA1ERIARFACZNGIATEPJAL. IF OTHERThANSTEUJMT21:.

Av6~cobki Mathod Saec~ca~ons

- U a~. Ncr. D8~c~i~I!o~ _____________________________

-I _____

38-E42~(1OfO~

Foam 35-E-W Form r(1QM*

.R~AppIcabIe:.

PWAAPPficab1&-1.:UY(* U LI Yes U ?4Q NO; I

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XIV Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Engineering QAP Input Form for Parts Orders (Form 36-E-89)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I JENGINEERhINGýOAPINPU-T: 7PARTS _____

New.

Codeký440BiM Saldexseswn_________

PC.sm 0-eod - -.. - -Cc I- kw  % - - - -=

Sm 16j#bW- .1 i-ooz,(igl-~e;- F e--- 4rpi--

M

. 'A______ -V - .

F.Orrn.0&-EýW#W ý IMCA AVAJCAMEý

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE, IN ,2 0 EXHIBIT NO. XV Effective R evision Date: 10-08-76 Date: I D-12-04 Flow Control Division TM'TE: NQA-1 Design Verification Checklist PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I

. .. .. " , .. Y..

wk*,A

-SEW

- 1,111a*

to- 0-- ui - A.

V . -'t.

_ _ .h, .-. ...

t-...  : *ft/ . : ." .i:, J'.

77QA. 7.7 x

-- t..mA,,.- A 5~~*-.** -. a...

A' -" ---

Li '

Procedure No.: 36-70-0.3-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XVI Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Diviion TITLE: Certification of Design for NPT Orders (Form 36-E-93)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I CERTIFICATION OF DESIGN FOR NPT ORDERS WITH NO DESIGN CHANGES FROM ORIGINAL ORDER Sales Order: Layout No.____ ____

Code Addenda: (Original) Sales Dwg. No. _

(New) Original S.O. No.

S.O. Line Item Description The above parts are a duplicate designs of the parts furnished on the original order. The materials selected are equal to or better than originally supplied.

The difference in Code/Addendas (if any) does not affect the design. If Class 1 and addenda is different, the design report has been modified. Because the parts are virtual duplicates of the original order, a formal Design Review Meeting is not required.

Project Engineer:

File: S.O. File FORM 36-E-93 Rev. 2

FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XVII Effective Date: 10-08-76 Flow Contro DivIslon PLANT INTERNAL__________________________

Page I of I OPERATING PROCEDURE T.FLWMMRVE

. .o

FLOWSERVE _____O V1 Efciv ae 1-87 Flow Control Dvslon PLANINTENALRequirements OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of I A ýM

~I3~AN*~0 CA

owýProcedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOW SERVE '44%1,0 EXHIBIT NO. XIX Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Conftrol DMvion TITLE: Design Report Reconciliation Form PLANT INTERNAL I OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 1 Re i:~ ,. . _r -. :...-.

• - *.. . "" "" . .. -. . . . :, *, -'.- . " -o

- i-.! . ~

.~ -- =..

U j.*.. t, 4L=-j'- . c- ,,,1= n . e o = .-- . . . ..

L *:  :  ; -, -.., * + - - ' . . " .

______ ______ ______lap.-

_____ __ n D~~~~ca~w ~ ~.0~? 7P* Z e z 3-"---_ _ _ _ _

~P~C~i~Af V,1L OV b L~~fep~ ~ t e

~~yAipc MLya loopiz_______________ _________

Do" this -o -

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO., XX Effective Date: 10-W-76 Revislon Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control DivIsion TITLE: Part Number/Material Change Advisement Form (PNCA)

PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I pJnw~ &Mb 7AL R&No. .x N .W-Off Dt aw

.wsM jiAd:

PARTNUMBE#MVtr G1--'~S~mr CUStoertam adAdiis

-Ce~~rtolop f 1W.

WJ-&4teta And ~ f Mreos04cn 0.0 O Enginr Pr~~~ct~ mAdnm3isritor Date Dl

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XXI Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Dvsion "1T"E:Sales Order Routing Sequence PLANT INTERNAL Page I of I OPERATING PROCEDURE r,

....... S ZOOM=-

• s'.-o 1, 3~, - .. - -

Oe__

] -

D~u

£ngLzke~ ~C~AZQ~

lie.x. ___

I I____

• E*1e~

4 _______ - _________ ________ I Me-iei~ ...

I, I

~

D*1.e4ed.

&* IuSLiml - I-

_-~

. .~

lilLY

~.c~aL Ote*r~ ...

C .

4~*.~-.

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XXII Effective Date: 10-08-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Plan Checklist for Sales Orders PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 1 of I

- -n~ V i.-R~1I~r ~ - - -

~s.4

- S1Z1. ~ ~ !VU mt .A

- -r M -PAA

• V V'it

i. =24.

t = a *~M5a Jh~iwtw EIWO

~rn~r~a ~ r V&

.4 43

.- ýWt~.

~ r- gA-

- "M b*tV i4 6- s ploub~i t, L ~ b i~L~ ~fk *I~I1114I

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XXIII Effective Date: 10-12-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Plan Checklist for Development Projects PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page I of 2

~SIGW ~TA)# O~C 1T~A~! -~

M0.ct ~eur, r. n ~ z Vi On p.

- Pag~

l~aot.IMVe.

1incaec= Efaw x 9/waw dinr~Pojo ~dd

~c~r~e &-Tft 9~az Mofisg P5. .es.rb g. r T I,

de*bte W 77tr b~qdJ6-**t

~o~ect RVg:

bo- -.4 Ar 6;-sSn c~in~ i~

-0 V-ir 0:2dx~ tneSrgDsg sr~ A

~o~5ot - rzfA ?hý.

m Pro)cedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XXIU 'Effective Date- 10-12-76 Revision Date: 10-12-04 Flow Control Division TITLE: Design Plan Checklist for Development Projects PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE Page 2 of 2 Oamp2.ete for ~1 ~ave1Qpm~zt p~ject~ tequir

~ags2~2 COD~+/-E+/-P~or*Cr tests antd w 'ro3evt ~ngr. 1 kr/A).

~Ve~pme2t tivierwa reo --an

-.P$6 -tt1-az ci ~Lneerfr~ VP Z kr/A.- A esea~ch X~2?..

re~eat~ Z~r. ~ kr/A A

~ff 4.0t -2i brep-eir toeciia reor o

2. Ram.. of eowi x& et M-Vxlf/A a-'

Procedure No.: 36-70-03-24 FLOWSERVE EXHIBIT NO. XXIV Effective Date: 10-08-76 Flow Control Division Revision Date: 10-12-04 TMTE: Typical Report Documentation PLANT INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURE