ML061440632

CPSES - Retake Exam - 09/2005 - Public Forms

ML061440632
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	05/18/2006
From:	Gody A Operations Branch IV
To:	Stetka T Operations Branch IV
References
50-445/05-302, 50-446/05-302, ES-201, ES-401, ES-403-1 50-445/05-302, 50-446/05-302
Download: ML061440632 (8)

Text

May 18,2005 Note to:

Tom Stetka, Chief Examiner Operations Branch From:

Anthony Gody, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety

SUBJECT:

EXAMINATION ASSIGNMENT You have been assigned as Chief of the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station retake examination. The retake examination will consist of one reactor operator written examination which has been scheduled to be completed during the week of September 12, 2005. Thank you for contacting the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station to finalize the details of the examination. You are reminded that the RPS/IP system must be maintained to ensure that the examiner and numbers of candidates are accurate.

a, a,

Q c

n o I 3 t

3

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 initials Task Description Item a l b

• l c #

1.

W R

I T

T t

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropnate

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S 2 I and maior transients.

-~

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

4 1

3

3.

W I

T

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test($)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified I

t I

I,

v r

, I -

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer ()

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ES -40 1 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 I

I Initial I

and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions

5.

Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or e audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or 9

the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor

' The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

II""

I I

c/

I I

I ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-I

~

Quality Checklist Facility:(ewcnc&

f i s k Date of Exam: @qh&r Exam Level: R O ~ S R O ~ ~

Initials I

Item Description a

1.

2.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented U

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, 24% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

A, b

I c

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

In Q)

W r

'F!

r m

c 0

m 0

0.

In c

L 0

f 0

Q v) m c

n w

c 0

m 2

u I-9

+

W F

(I) u F

I-W I- (I)

LL LL LL 0

IY (D

d 0

0 In 0.

J a

cn W