ML060670120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC & PSEG Meeting Salem and Hope Creek Presentation with Handwritten Notes
ML060670120
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/2004
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML060670120 (15)
v • d • e


Text

QQ4R

IQ\\

NRC & PSEG Meeting Salem and Hope Creek June 16, 2004 S.9 Nuclear Regulatory Comnmission - Region I King of Prussia, PA Agenda

  • NRC Presentation
  • NRC/PSEG Discussion
  • NRC/PSEG Meeting Conclusion
  • NRC Accepts Questions/Comments from Public all;,

1

Agenda - N]RC Presentation

  • 2003 Annual Assessment of Salem and Hope Creek Performance

>Review of Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)

>National Summary of Plant Performance

>Salem & Hope Creek Performance Results

  • Assessment of the 'Work Environment at Salem and Hope Creek, including organizational effectiveness of the Corrective Action Program and Work Management Process j

Agenda - PSEG Presentation

  • Response to Annual Assessment
  • Discussion of Work. Environment Reviews/Assessments and Organizational Effectiveness
  • Action Plan to Address Work Environment/

Organizational Effectiveness Issues and Ensure Plan Effectiveness 2

3

Significance, of Findings and Performance Indicators

  • Significance involves determining potential or actual safety consequences
  • Green - very low safety significance
  • White - low to moderate safety significance
  • Yellow-substantialsafetysignificance
  • Red - high safety significance National Summary for ROP in 2003 Performance indicator results (at end of CY 2003)

- Green 1825

- White 15

- Yellow 0

-Red 0

  • Total inspection findings (at the end of CY 2003)
  • Green 748
  • White 19
  • Yellow 2
  • Red 4

4

(

National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of ROP Cycle 4 Status at End of CY 2003 Licensee Response 75 Regulatory Response 22 Degraded Cornerstone 2

Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3

Unacceptable 0

Total 102*

  • Davis-Besse is in IMC 0350 process NRC Oversight of Salem & Hope Creek (January 1 - December 31, 2003)
  • Significant NRC inspection effort
  • Significant NRC inspector oversight
  • Significant NRC management oversight and attention 5

Inspection Program at Salem 1 & 2 (January 1 -December 31, 2003) 3250 Hours of Direct Inspection, plus 4730 hours0.0547 days <br />1.314 hours <br />0.00782 weeks <br />0.0018 months <br /> of additional inspection-related effort

>2 Resident Inspectors

> 11 Regional Specialist Inspections

>5 Team Inspections

> 2 Special Inspections

>1 Supplemental Inspection

  • 25 Green Findings and 1 White Salem 1 Performance Indicators Http://WVW.NRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process

=1 3~ mlb F:=~~~~

Re acmlr

_aet

_~~I

_s _

Pu

_*~h~b

(

6

Salem 1 - Inspection Results Htp:\\\\WWWNRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process Re l

F~PII1 Meg 'liORMcant kpedlou iludimp E3WKII 1_

Salem 2 Performance Indicators Htp://WWW.NRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process Li ftfteshdcbf

~-

7

Salem 2 - Inspection Results Htp:\\\\WWW.NRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process

[Eaftly neil ~

alhc A

n S

40_1 1_ _I-RZI_

l _ E --

NRC Assessment of Salem 1 & 2 (January 1 - December 31, 2003)

  • Preserved Public Health and Safety
  • At completion of 2003:

>Salem 1 - Regulatory Response Column

>Salem 2 - Licensee Response Column

  • Baseline inspection in 2003
  • 1 supplemental at Unit 1 (EDG turbocharger failure in September 2002 that resulted in a white finding during 2003)
  • Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue -Problem Identification and Resolution 8

Inspection Program at Hope Creek (January 1 - December 31, 2003)

  • 2410 Hours of Direct Inspection, plus 3310 hours0.0383 days <br />0.919 hours <br />0.00547 weeks <br />0.00126 months <br /> of additional inspection-related work

>2 Resident Inspectors

> 12 Regional Specialist Inspections

>2 Tearn Inspections

  • 19Green Findings Hope Creek Performance Indicators Http://WWW.NRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process 1>Fi1 A____

I &

]~

A~~

P1o

,airmw dl_e 9

(

Hope Creek - Inspection Results Htp:\\\\WWW.NRC.GOV then click Nuclear Reactors/Reactor Oversight Process Mustignmic"amthpedon Ramp

~

wz-l Hope Creek - Assessment (January 1 - December 31, 2003)

  • Preserved Public Health and Safety
  • At Completion of 2003:

Hope Creek - Licensee Response Column

  • Baseline Inspection in 2003
  • May 10, 2004 White Issue Shifted HC to Regulatory Response Column
  • Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue -Problem Identification and Resolution

(

10

Overall Performance Assessment Using Reactor Oversight Process 2003

  • Performance Indicators and Inspection Results indicate Salem and HC have preserved adequate saiety margin Substantive cross-cutting issue continues to exist in area of Problem Identification &

Resolution AIr all Prior NRC Assessment Letters Identified substantive cross-cutting issue:

Problem Identification & Resolution

>Untimely and ineffective

>Longstanding problems uncorrected

>Poor implementation of maintenance

>Insufficient coordination & work control

>Equipment reliability weaknesses

>Deficient engineering evaluation of root causes l'

11

t%

Initiation of NRC's Special Review Based on:

  • NRC August 27, 2003 Mid-Cycle Assessment Letter
  • NRC Inspection Findings

>Baseline and Supplemental

  • Allegations NRC Request for PSEG Assessment Jan. 28, 2004 NRC letter to PSEG:
  • Based on ongoing NRC special review
  • Expressed concerns about work environment

>Raising concerns

>Addressing concerns

  • Request that PSEG conduct in-depth assessment
  • Prior surveys may form a part of PSEG assessment 12

NRC Request for PSEG Assessment NRC concerns related to work environment for:

  • Handling emergent issues and associated operational decision-making
  • Addressing potential safety issues These concerns included:
  • Openness of management to concerns and alternate views
  • Strength of communication
  • Effectiveness of corrective actions and feedback processes Concerns did not involve any serious safety violations (e.g. no Yellow or Red findings) i NRC Request for PSEG Assessment
  • NRC letter to PSEG 1/28/04

> Described potential work environment concerns and requested assessment e PSEG letter to NRC 2/27/04

> Provided interim assessment plans

  • Public meeting 3/18/04

> Discussed assessment plans

  • PSEG letter to NRC 5/21/04

> Described assessment results

  • NRC Public Meeting 6/16/04

> Discuss assessment results and action plan

'(

13

(s I

NRC: Next Steps (o

Finalize NRC Special Review )

  • Complete Evaluation of PSEG Assessments
  • Compare NRC & PSEIG Results
  • Receive/Evaluate PSEG Plans
  • Decide Additional Regulatory Actions and Follow-up NRC Representatives
  • H. Miller, Regional Admini'strator, Region I
  • A. Randolph Blough, Director, Division of Reactor Projects
  • D. Holody, Acting Branch Chief

>(610) 337-5312

  • E. Cobey, Incoming Branch Chief

>(610) 337-5171

  • D. Collins, Project Manager, NRR
  • D. Orr, Senior Resident Inspector, Salem
  • G. Malone, Resident Inspector, Salem
  • M. Gray, Senior Resident Inspector, Hope Creek
  • M. Ferdas, Resident Inspector, Hope Creek
  • N. Sheehan, Public Affairs Officer

>(610) 337-5331

  • L. Jarriel, Agency Allegation Advisor
  • J. Clifford, Section Chief, Nuclear Reactor Regulation 14

Reference Sources

  • Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) lhA'V)

Qg*k 4FV be movi edl p,(r

/ccoogr/okse Ino Kaf th li e lv24 tw

//i/,4 4

~ C

  • WrtIA J c_

'4 vf.

t4 VIOW.

1 oI i4 a

Hos

  • b f oisnf a hu4 of oiy C4,0'.A tovj~s a~

_M 0I AM ;Aw

. I,.4 L 4v.

,g ot bo,'I k{ v pe-h

./ w e,

do..

9w 4

j4 g D oe i V,

&.h

' d 4

8 r^4 Ot. v A.

  1. ~rs
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML060670120&oldid=5368541"