ML060660349
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ML060660349 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 02/07/2006 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML060660349 (1) | |
Text
UCS's Candidate Questions for PSEG at March 18th Meeting
- 1. NRC's assessment letters over the past two years reported concerns about the problem identification and resolution processes at Salem and Hope Creek.
- a. Does PSEG agree that its problem identification and resolution processes need improvement?
- b. If yes, what steps are planned by PSEG to address these concerns?
- c. If yes, what metrics will be used by PSEG to evaluate progress in the problem identification and resolution area?
- 2. The Synergy survey results indicate that several workers feel that PSEG is very good at identifying problems, but not as effective at fixing the real root cause.
- a. Does PSEG believe it has an adequate root cause evaluation process?
- b. If yes, why can't the company implement effective corrective actions?
- c. If no, what steps will be taken when to upgrade root cause evaluations?
- 3. The Synergy survey results suggest that the Employee Concerns Program is not working well.
- a. Is the Employee Concerns Program meeting PSEG's expectations?
- b. If not, what steps are planned to address the shortfalls?
- c. If not, what metrics will be used to evaluate progress in correcting the shortfalls?
- 4. The Synergy survey results indicate a mnis-communication at best and a breakdown in trust at worst between the work force and management.
- a. Does PSEG believe it has adequately communicated expectations to the work force and that the work force has adequately understood its message?
- b. If so, how does PSEG explain the Synergy survey results?
- c. If not, what steps are planned to address the management/work force disconnect?
- 5. PSEG's response on February 27, 2004, indicated that it believes recent management changes have produced positive results.
- a. How does PSEG explain the Synergy survey results reporting that a significant percentage of the work force believes that conditions are worse now than 12 to 18 months ago?
- b. What objective measures will PSEG use to demonstrate progress?
- 6. The Synergy survey results reveal that rrmany workers have witnessed several PSEG management changes and the roll-out of numerous improvement programs, leaving them somewhat skeptical as to whether initiatives are sincere and will be sustained.
- a. What steps are planned to move beyond new faces and new themes towards a real, lasting partnership at Salem and Hope Creek?
- b. What initial and continuing role will Nuclear Training play in establishing and retaining work force buy-in to the mission?