ML060660310

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from D. Vito of USNRC to Salemhcscwe, Regarding SCWE Matter
ML060660310
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/2003
From: Vito D
NRC Region 1
To:
Public Service Enterprise Group
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML060660310 (1)


Text

-. 40-I Daniel Holody - Fwd: Please deliver to Mr. Hub Miller Page 1 DailHld w:Pes eie oM.HbMle ae1 From:

David Vito 7h To:

SALEMHCSCWE Date:

12/12/03 1:33PM

Subject:

Fwd: Please deliver to Mr. Hub Miller

- SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION -

- PROTECT ACCORDINGLY -

Hub, et.al.

Please see the attached letter from Dr. H. She just called and asked that I deliver this to you promptly.

Briefly, she met yesterday w/D. Lochbaum, Billie! Garde, Jim Riccio, and others to discuss her situation and interaction with the agency on the SCWE matter. While she continued to express her confidence in our efforts, it would also appear that she does not want to wait much longer for the NRC to issue a finding and/or initiate some type of interaction with, or finding against, the licensee. I am surmising this by her implied deadline in the letter, i.e. " I will be back in touch with you a month from now. In the meantime, I trust that important decisions will be made and announced."

She also mentions in the letter the recent PSEG response to her state court discrimiantion complaint.

This document was received and distributed by the Allegation Office yesterday to approriate staff for review and discussion at the next periodic ARB for the allegation (scheduled for Thursday 12/18/03). As we discussed during the 01 prioritization meeting yesterday, she is very intersted in how we take PSEG to task with regard to issues they deny in the response to the court complaint that we may identify in our review as not being as clearly deniable or totally incorrect.

Also, for thought and future consideration, based on her contacts yesterday, and the information we received a few days ago about the potential interaction with 60 Minutes, we may reach a point in the very near future where will need to declare her as a "widely known alleger," as it would appear that it will be come more and more difficult to protect her identity as more people are made aware of her association with this matter. If you would like me to start pursuing this at this time, I can inform Lisa Ja rriel about the current circumstances and get her take on it.

!4 -

\\