E-mail from A. Blough of NRC to Various, Regarding PSEG SCWE UpdatesML060660117 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Salem, Hope Creek |
---|
Issue date: |
05/11/2004 |
---|
From: |
Blough A NRC Region 1 |
---|
To: |
Barber S, Dan Collins, Marc Ferdas, Mel Gray, Holody D, Malone G, Dan Orr, Passarelli A, Ted Wingfield NRC Region 1 |
---|
References |
---|
FOIA/PA-2005-0194 |
Download: ML060660117 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24277A0812024-10-0303 October 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Atlantic Sturgeon Collected on 10/02/2024 ML24269A0362024-09-24024 September 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Kemps Ridley Sea Turtle Collected on 9/24/2024 ML24253A1942024-09-0909 September 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Eeeb RAI - Hope Creek Amendment to Revise TS to Change Surveillance Interval to Accommodate 24-Month Fuel Cycle ML24249A1362024-09-0404 September 2024 EN 57304 - Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Final Report - No Embedded Files. Notification of the Potential Existence of Defects Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 21 ML24248A0452024-09-0303 September 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Kemps Ridley Sea Turtle Collected on 9/3/2024 ML24240A2092024-08-27027 August 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Relief Request VR-04, SSW Rupture Disc Replacement ML24229A0422024-08-16016 August 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Salem 1 and 2 - Implement Optimized ZIRLO Fuel Rod Cladding ML24229A0432024-08-16016 August 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Salem 1 and 2 - Exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K to Allow the Use of Optimized ZIRLO Fuel Rod Cladding ML24227A5092024-08-14014 August 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Kemps Ridley Sea Turtle Collected on 8/13/2024 ML24228A1942024-08-14014 August 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form for a Live - Atlantic Sturgeon 8/14/2024 ML24197A1022024-07-15015 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise TS Lift Settings for Reactor Coolant System Safety Relief Valves ML24250A0562024-07-11011 July 2024 PSEG to NMFS, Regarding Processing of Fin Clips ML24219A2472024-07-0909 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Shortnose Sturgeon 7/9/2024 ML24163A1632024-06-11011 June 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise TS to Change Surveillance Interval to Accommodate 24-Month Fuel Cycle ML24123A0522024-05-0101 May 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - One Deceased Sturgeon 4/30/2024 ML24106A0542024-04-12012 April 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - One Alive Atlantic Sturgeon 4/12/2024 ML24101A2192024-04-0909 April 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Atlantic Sturgeon 4/8/24 ML24093A1222024-04-0101 April 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - One Atlantic Sturgeon 4/1/2024 ML24075A1862024-03-14014 March 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Biological Opinion Gar 2020-02842 - PSEG Salem and Hope Creek Generating Station Annual Incidental Take Report - 2023 ML24060A0492024-02-28028 February 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Exhb RAI for Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 Amendment to Modify Exclusion Area Boundary ML24030A8432024-01-30030 January 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 2023 PSEG Sturgeon Pit Tag Data ML24016A1612024-01-10010 January 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Forms - Two Atlantic Sturgeon 1/9/2024 ML24002A7222023-12-29029 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - 2023 Annual Report - Inspection of the Circulating Water Intake Structure (Cwis) Trash Rack Bars ML24002A7242023-12-28028 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Sturgeon 12/28/2023 ML23355A2732023-12-21021 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Response to Questions Associated with Supplement to Salem-Hope Creek Eab Reduction LAR ML24002A7252023-12-21021 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Shortnose Sturgeon 12/21/23 ML23346A0962023-12-0606 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Reminder - Final Report - Completion of Required Additional Protocol (AP) Information in Accordance with the U.S. - IAEA Treaty Obligations ML23311A0792023-11-0101 November 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Atlantic Sturgeon Collected on 10/31/2023 ML23277A0482023-10-0404 October 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - 10/4/2023 Email: Acceptance Review - Hope Creek and Salem 1 and 2 - LAR to Modify Exclusion Area Boundary ML23277A0732023-09-29029 September 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 9/29/2023 Email from PSEG: Supplement to Proposed Amendment to PSEG Master Decommissioning Trust Amendment ML23226A0702023-08-11011 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form for Sturgeon Collected on 8/10/2023 ML23226A0732023-08-10010 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Submittal of Necropsy Reports Regarding Sea Turtles Collected on 06/12/2022 ML23201A0132023-07-20020 July 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Salem 1 and 2 - Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Containment Leak Rate Test Frequencies ML23172A0982023-06-21021 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Kemp'S Ridley Sea Turtle Collected on 06/20/2022 ML23164A2062023-06-13013 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report - Kemp'S Ridley Sea Turtle Collected on 06/12/2023 ML24250A0572023-06-0606 June 2023 PSEG to NMFS, Request for Sturgeon Fin Clip Analysis Facilities ML23163A0442023-06-0606 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Biological Opinion GAR-2020-02842; FIN Clip Analysis Facilities ML23153A1552023-06-0202 June 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Atlantic Sturgeon 6/1/2023 ML23151A6582023-05-31031 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Forms Sturgeon 5/30/2023 ML23137A2632023-05-17017 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Forms Sturgeon 5/16/2023 ML23135A0102023-05-11011 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report Sturgeon 5/11/2023 ML23129A7892023-05-0909 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise Trip and Standby Auto-Start Logic Associated with Safety Related HVAC Trains ML23136B2832023-05-0404 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Bottom Trawl Sampling - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Form - Atlantic Sturgeon 5/3/2023 ML23122A1982023-05-0202 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report and Data Collection Forms for Atlantic Sturgeon 5/1/2023 ML23122A1672023-05-0202 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek and Salem 1 and 2 - Revise TS to Delete TS Section 5.5 - Meteorological Tower Location ML23117A2722023-04-17017 April 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating STATION-INCIDENTAL Take of Atlantic Sturgeon Collected on 04/14/2023 ML23079A0032023-03-17017 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 - Evacuation Time Estimate Review ML23065A0452023-02-23023 February 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem & Hope Creek Generating STATIONS-ANNUAL Incidental Take REPORT-STATION & REMP ML23033A0302023-02-0808 February 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - Incidental Take Report Sturgeon 1/24/2023 ML23010A2882023-01-10010 January 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating STATION-INCIDENTAL Take of Atlantic Sturgeon Collected on 01/09/2023 2024-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
From: A. Randolph Blough go To: Anne Passarelli; Daniel Collins; Daniel Holody; Daniel Orr; George Malone; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield Date: 5/11/04 12:33PM
Subject:
Re: PSEG SCWE Updates thanks, marc.
they seem to be puffing some thought into these statements.
randy
>>> Marc Ferdas 05/07/04 09:02AM >>>
Please see below for two recent summaries on PSEG's efforts in the SCWE area. The first discusses the IAT and the second describes PSEG's efforts in addressing Synergy Results. I pointed out some of the important info in bold, for quick viewing.
Independent Team Delivers Recommendations for Improvement at PSEG Nuclear Report Prepared in Response to NRC Letter to Management Members of an independent team chartered by Chairman and CEO Jim Ferland have delivered their final report evaluating the environment at Salem/Hope Creek for raising and addressing safety issues. The team was formed in response to a letter received on January 28th 2004 from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and was led by Jim O'Hanlon, the former head of Dominion Power's generation business. Team members consisted of outside consultants with extensive nuclear regulatory and management experience.
They conducted an extensive review that included some 190 interviews of current and former employees at the station as well as at the Newark general office. As part of its work, team members examined numerous records. These included: survey results, NRC inspection reports, records of unresolved conflicts, management's operational decision-making, the Employee Concerns Program, management's effectiveness in detecting and preventing retaliation and chilling effect behavior, and the communication between Newark corporate management and PSEG Nuclear (corporate/site interface) and the effects of that communication on the work environment.
The bottom line: The results of the independent team are consistent with those of two major surveys recently conducted at the site and call for action to improve the work environment at Salem/Hope Creek. The findings of the team highlighted that employees at all levels contribute to a safety conscious work environment (SCWE) and that management must clearly express and continually reinforce its unwavering commitment to safety.
"The team's candid feedback and recommendations will help us improve our overall safety focus," said Ferland. "The report tells us that although we have always had a corporate ethic that favors safety over production, that message may not be coming through as loud and clear as we would like. Let there be no mistake about it - safety will always be first in this company." Frank Cassidy, president of PSEG Power, said that in order to reinforce the priority of safety, the Power Behaviors will be modified to place safety at the top of the list for all employees as part of a "next steps" plan. "For our nuclear operations, these behavior standards will be used as a benchmark to track our specific efforts to improve the work environment at Salem/Hope Creek and to measure our progress going forward," said Cassidy. "We need to make it crystal clear - to everyone in the organization - that a commitment to safety isthe most important expectation we have."
"The work that lies ahead," said Cassidy, "will be a challenge to all of us." He noted that Roy Anderson, president and CNO of PSEG Nuclear and senior vice president Chris Bakken have the bulk of the Cf
-w responsibility on their shoulders to help effect change at the country's second largest nuclear installation. "The program we intend to implement will take everyone's best effort" he said, "but I pledge my own direct involvement and I know that Roy, Chris and I have very specific results we want to achieve."
Bakken said an action plan isbeing prepared that will integrate the results of the team's recommendations along with the results of the Synergy and USA Assessment surveys. He also noted that senior management at Nuclear will be meeting on May 10 and 11 to address these issues and to develop a plan to address the findings that will be presented to the NRC at a public meeting in June. Prior to that public meeting, the company will file all three reports - the extensive executive summary of the Synergy Survey, the USA Assessment Survey and the final report of the Independent Assessment Team -with the NRC and will present its action plan to all Nuclear employees as well.
"Inaddition to the Independent Assessment Team's Report, we have a renewed commitment from PSEG's senior management and the Nuclear Committee of the Board of Directors to make significant improvements in the way we manage and operate at Salem/Hope Creek," said Roy Anderson. "The entire senior management team understands this message and recognizes that our actions must match our words. "We must ensure that employees feel free to raise concerns, that we address concerns promptly and that we will not tolerate retaliation of any kind,"
Anderson said. "We will also be enhancing our Employee Concerns Program so that it remains an effective resource for employees.
We are fortunate to have Mike Brothers -- with his experience in safety conscious work environment improvements at Millstone and several other commercial and DOE nuclear facilities - to lead our SCWE effort. I have every confidence we will succeed."
Synergy Phase IIWork Culture Improvement Team The second phase of our work culture improvement process occurred recently over the three-day period of April 20 through 22. There a cross-sectional group of employees, both union and mast associates, met and reviewed the Problem Statements and recommendations from the original Synergy Phase I teams.
During this time, the team also reviewed the original data from the Synergy Culture survey to see if there were any recommendations that had not been addressed during Phase I. A couple of items of concern that were not completely covered in Phase I were added to the discussion.
After reviewing all the recommendations, the team felt the issues fell into three distinct, yet interrelated categories: People, Process, and Plant.
The Phase II team developed several prioritized recommendations that will have a positive Impact upon People, Process, and the Plant (Facilities and Physical Plant), in both the short and long term. These recommendations, when implemented by involved employees, will make a definite successful difference in the way we do things. These findings and recommendations were rolled out to the Senior Executive Team on Thursday April 28 and include the formation of Employee Teams:
A cross-discipline team of employees from both Salem and Hope Creek Stations is being established to work on improving the facilities, where we do our work, so that we are not an outlier from the industry and will be more effective in our work and comfortable in our environment. This team will help oversee the improvements to our shops, plants and cafeteria.
Several other teams will be created to develop a 'Picture of Excellence' and then implement
Daniel oroay- Re: PSEG SCW Updates P'ge 3 recommendations and improvements for both the CAP and Work Management processes to help realize that CAP and Work Management are not separate but interrelated processes. Here we need to establish alignment /accountability, effectively follow the process requirements, and utilize performance measures that accurately reflect implementation.
A final team will be created to make recommendations on improving our working relationships, communications and general work culture. These teams will help to ensure that the areas cof concern identified during Phase I and Phase 11will be addressed to improve our People, Process, and Plant.
CC: Brian Holian; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins; Richard Crlenjak; Wayne Lanning