ML060610645
| ML060610645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2004 |
| From: | Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Clifford J, Dan Collins, Kim T, Geoffrey Miller NRC/EDO, NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML060610645 (1) | |
Text
-
.I R
I Daniel Holody - Re: Fwd: UCS recommendations tor.alem / Hope GreeK Page 1 I 1.
From:
Herbert Berkow To:
Daniel Collins; Glenn Miller; James Clifford; Tae Kim Date:
6/10/04 2:00PM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: UCS recommendations for Salem / Hope Creek Jim: Donna Skay needs to set up the PRB meeting if we have one. It would also be useful to get copies of the UCS letter to Jack, Donna, and me ASAP. Thanks, Herb Alp
>>> James Clifford 06/10/04 01:54PM >>>
TJ, Thanks - we will make sure we include Jack in the PRB meeting!
Jim
>>> T.J. Kim (Tae Kim) 06/10/04 01 :52PM >>>
Jim/Dan-I'd recommend that you involve Jack Goldberg of OGC in the PRB meeting. This morning, I spoke briefly with Steve Burns and Jack Goldberg regarding the subject letter from UCS. They advised against treating this letter as a 2.206 petition. I can fill you in on the details on Monday morning.
TJ
>>> A. Randolph Blough 06/10/04 09:51AM >>>
having PRB make that collective determination is a good idea and i believe jim clifford is arranging that.
>>> Daniel Collins 06/09/04 06:54PM >>>
I think we need to take a very close look at whether or not this should be treated as a 2.206 petition.
Even though Mr. Lochbaum explicitly states that UCS doesn't view the letter as 2.206 petition, the letter contains the necessary elements of a 2.206. It requests specific action be taken against the licensee (i.e.
Shutdown Order - or - an Order to demonstrate tangible improvement within 6 months) and it sets forth an argument that constitutes the basis for that request.
We might want to send it through a PRB to get the "expert" eyes on it and, if nothing else, capture our rationale for not treating at a 2.206 in the PRB's meeting minutes.
I1
>>> A. Randolph Blough 06/09/2004 9:33:04 AM >>>
this is a surprise; although we were expecting comments from UCS, including recommendation of an order to fix SCWE,, we did not expect the primary recommendation to be for a S/D order.
I don't know if UCS will make a public statement on this. They, for the most part, have not made this is highly public issue.
will update you as we get more.
randy CC:
A. Randolph Blough; Cornelius Holden; Daniel Holody; Jack Goldberg eA@