ML060600288
| ML060600288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/2003 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194, RI-2003-A-0110 | |
| Download: ML060600288 (2) | |
Text
f,
-,
I 1
. I g:\\alleg\\panel\\200301 10arb4.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2003-A-01 10 Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek ARB Date:
11/07/2003 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Acknowledged: Yes Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed:
Current Actions on Tech Issues and SCWE Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)? Issue will not be referred to licensee ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees:
Chair - Holian, Blouch Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Holody, Urban, Lannina, Barber DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
DRP to evaluate whether SCWE inspection should be conducted. Continue with the joint staff/Ol review currently ongoing.
Responsible Person:
Meyer/Barber Closure Documentation:
ECD:
12/5/03 Completed:
- 2)
Review survey results from the recent ECP SCWE surveys, Gallup Q12 survey and Winston and Strawn assessment o1 SCWE for the purpose of understanding the licensee's response to the alleger's issue brought to the licensee previously. NRC reviewers will provide an assessment of the adequacy of PSEG's SCWE reviews and the legitimacy of PSEG's conclusions.
Responsible Person: Meyer/Urban Closure Documentation:
ECD: 12/5/2003 Completed:
- 3)
DRP will continue to update the summary of technical issues on weekly basis considering information from additional information from interviews, information from review of transcripts of completed interviews, DRS review of TARP reports and NRB documentation.
Responsible Person:
Meyer Closure Documentation:
ECD:
Ongoing Completed:
- 4)
Repanel if indications of wrongdoing are identified.
Responsible Person:
Meyer/Barber Closure Documentation:
ECD:
Bi-Weekly Completed:
SAFElY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT:
SCWE Review PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
High If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
1t 2
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIC)NS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?__
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES,: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)