ML053260305

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail from Vito to Mohrwinkel, Vermont Yankee Uprate
ML053260305
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/2004
From: Vito D
NRC Region 1
To: Cwalina G, Mohrwinkel C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0369
Download: ML053260305 (5)


Text

rage -i I riacy vvalKer - i-wa: vermont anee uprate rage *i 

From:

To:

Date:

Subject:

David Vito 1J\\

Carl Mohrwinkel; Gregory Cwalina Thu, Apr 1, 2004 11:33 AM Fwd: Vermont Yankee Uprate,,

Carl, VY Power Uprate is a licensing issue that is being handled by NRR. Greg is brokering items. I think things like this are going to the VY PM for public response.

CC:

Cliff Anderson; Diane Screnci; Donald Florek; Leanne Harrison; Lisamarie Jarriel; Sharon Johnson; Tracy Walker Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information

Act, exco

I C:kTEMP\\GW)00001.TMP Paae I I I-C:TM\\

IQ-IMPPaa I I Mail Envelope Properties (406C4442.3D5: 21: 34876)

Subject:

Fwd: Vermont Yankee Uprate Creation Date:

Thu, Apr 1, 2004 11:33 AM From:

David Vito Created By:

DJV@nrc.gov Recipients kpl-po.KPDO DPS CC (Diane Screnci)

TEW CC (Tracy Walker) nrc.gov kpl-po.KPDO CJA CC (Cliff Anderson)

DJFI CC (Donald Florek)

LMH1 CC (Leanne Harrison)

SLJ CC (Sharon Johnson) nrc.gov owf2_po.OWFNDO CAM (Carl Mohrvinkel)

GCC (Gregory Cwalina) nrc.gov owf4_po.0WFNDO LUJ CC (Lisamarie Jarriel)

Post Office Route kpl-po.KPLDO kpl-po.KP_DO nrc.gov owf2.po.0WFN.D0 nrc.gov owf4,po.OWFNLDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time Mail MESSAGE 730 Thursday, April 1, 2004 11:33 AM Options Expiration Date:

None Priority:

Standard Reply Requested:

No Return Notification:

None

I C

\\TFQMP\\GWW}qQ 1.TiP -v Page 2 Concealed

Subject:

No Security:

Standard

e i0*jVafb -'Ptd Xednrf Yarkb Ip

's

' s' From:

ALLEGATION To:

David Vito; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson Date:

Thu. Apr 1, 2004 11:25 AM

Subject:

Fwd: Vermont Yankee Uprate From the web-site. Not an allegation, but needs an answer via correspondence re: VY. thanks.

CC:

Lisamarie Jarriel

From:

iI=

To:

<allegation~nrc.gov>

Date:

Tue, Mar 30, 2004 11:28 AM

Subject:

Vermont Yankee Uprate I am writing to express my extreme concern with the planned uprate of the Vermont Yankee facility in southern Vermont. I am a resident oNaI nearby town though in a different state. Our town is in the evacuation zone in case of an emergency at the plant. I feel it to be a gross disregard for public safety to even consider granting Vermont Yankee with this uprate. The facts are:

04G

  • Vermont Yankee at best has a questionable safety history
  • The proposed uprate would be the highest ever granted by the NRC
  • Vermont Yankee's safety equipment is grandfathered so that even though there have been technological advances which could greatly improve safety, there is no plan or requirement to improve the facilities I feel particularly strongly about this matter because, as a resident in the evacuation area, problems with the plant might require me to pick up and leave a town that I love, possible for a time of numerous years.

The fact that this decision to uprate could occur without so much as an independent safety assessment terrifies me. I will be unable to attend the public meeting on the matter (3/31 in Vernon, VT), but I refuse to stay silent about this issue. I feel that a plant in Vermont has no right to put residents of Massachusetts (as well as its own) in jeopardy by uprating a facility that isn't even currently operating at 100%. Please do not grant this aging facility its requested uprate for the sake of safety of MY TOWN if no other reason.

Sincerely, Jared Libbb, I?